The Zhengjian Book Series
Editorial Team
Published: April, 2003
from
PureInsight Website
Oklo: Ancient African
Nuclear Reactor
The
remnants of nuclear reactors nearly two billion years old were
found in the 1970s in Africa. These reactors are thought to have occurred
naturally. No natural reactors exist today, since the relative density of
fissile uranium has now decayed below that needed for a sustainable
reaction. Pictured above is Fossil Reactor 15, located in Oklo, Gabon.
Uranium oxide remains are visible as the yellowish rock. Oklo by-products
are being used today to study the stability of the fundamental constants
over cosmological time-scales and to develop more effective means for
disposing of human-manufactured nuclear waste.
In
1972, a French company imported some uranium ore from Oklo in
the Gabon Republic in Africa. Surprisingly the uranium concentration in the
ore was as low as spent uranium fuel from a nuclear reactor.
The finding led
scientists to believe that the uranium had already been used for energy
production. This discovery shocked the world and attracted scientists from
many countries to go to Oklo for further investigation.
The results showed that the
uranium mine was an ancient nuclear reactor. The ancient
reactor consisted of five hundred tons of utilized uranium ore
in six different areas. Its output power was estimated to be approximately
one hundred kilowatts.
The reactor was perfectly preserved and its layout
was very rational. It is estimated that the reactor had been in operation
for around 500,000 years. Furthermore, nuclear wastes produced in this
reactor had not spread all over the surrounding areas. Instead, they were
confined within the separate sections. From the perspective of modern
nuclear technology, this ancient reactor used very advanced
techniques.
According to geological dating, the Oklo uranium mine was
formed about 2 billion years ago. Shortly after formation, the nuclear
reactor commenced operation. The research results made scientists seriously
consider the possibility of a prehistoric civilization. Such a
nuclear reactor could be a product of a civilization from long ago, although
scientists have proposed completely natural mechanisms by which the chain
reactions could have taken place.
Human beings have only made use of nuclear power for a couple of decades.
This discovery raised the intriguing possibility that a
technologically more advanced civilization existed two billion years
ago and it had advanced knowledge of nuclear fission. But if this assumption
were correct, one would ask why such an advanced civilization did not
perpetuate its own existence. Instead, it disappeared for unknown reasons,
leaving only ancient relics. How should we view such a discovery? A large
unaccounted-for time gap exists between two billion years ago and our
present historical human civilization. What could have happened during that
time?
If we neglect relics of prehistoric civilization, there is no
way we can broaden the scope of our present knowledge. We will neither know
what caused prehistoric civilizations to degenerate, or how they finally
came to disappear. Moreover, we should carefully examine whether our current
method of scientific development is following the same disastrous road. This
is surely a subject worthy of serious consideration.
|