by Philip Coppens
from
PhilipCoppens Website
Are the Indian remains of
Mohenjo Daro and Harappa, their sudden
abandonment and the apparent discovery of an ancient site with a
layer of radioactive ash the best available evidence for the
possibility that our ancient ancestors possessed a highly advanced
technology – which might have included atomic warfare? |
Did an ancient advanced
civilization exist on Earth? The question is
very intriguing and the search for “evidence” to support a positive
answer has intrigued Mankind for many decades – if not centuries.
Many possibilities have been put forward, from outright statements
that
Atlantis was a high tech civilization, to the possibility that
the
Nazca lines might be a prehistoric airport.
Rather than an accumulation of various items of evidence that is
then subjected to the possibility that it might be either alien or
advanced, it is more scientific – and perhaps better- to focus on
the quest for the “best evidence”: a single piece of evidence that
in itself is the best example to support a conclusion. In the search
for an advanced ancient civilization, what would be this “best
evidence”?
One possible item that would classify as “best evidence” exists
within the Indus River Valley, where towns such as Harappa and
Mohenjo Daro flourished in 3000 BC. The question is why these cities
were abandoned. And one answer that has been put forward is that the
ancient cities might have been irradiated by an atomic blast. If
true, it would be impossible to ignore the conclusion that ancient
civilization possessed high technology.
The ruins of Harappa
The story begins when a
layer of radioactive ash was found in
Rajasthan, India. It covered a three-square mile area, ten miles
west of Jodhpur. The research occurred after a very high rate of
birth defects and cancer was discovered in the area. The levels of
radiation registered so high on investigators’ gauges that the
Indian government cordoned off the region. Scientists then
apparently unearthed an ancient city where they found evidence of an
atomic blast dating back thousands of years: from 8,000 to 12,000
years.
The blast was said to have destroyed most of the buildings
and probably a half-million people.
Archeologist Francis Taylor stated that etchings in some nearby
temples he translated suggested that they prayed to be spared from
the great light that was coming to lay ruin to the city.
“It’s so
mind-boggling to imagine that some civilization had nuclear
technology before we did. The radioactive ash adds credibility to
the ancient Indian records that describe atomic warfare.”
When
excavations of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro reached the street level,
they discovered skeletons scattered about the cities, many holding
hands and sprawling in the streets as if some instant, horrible doom
had taken place. People were just lying, unburied, in the streets of
the city. And these skeletons are thousands of years old, even by
traditional archaeological standards. What could cause such a thing?
Why did the bodies not decay or get eaten by wild animals?
Furthermore, there is no apparent cause of a physically violent
death. A. Gorbovsky, in Riddles of Ancient History, reported the
discovery of at least one human skeleton in this area with a level
of radioactivity approximately 50 times greater than it should have
been due to natural radiation. Furthermore, thousands of fused lumps,
christened “black stones”, have been found at Mohenjo-Daro. These
appear to be fragments of clay vessels that melted together in
extreme heat.
Another curious sign of an ancient nuclear war in India is a giant
crater near Bombay. The nearly circular 2,154-metre-diameter Lonar
crater (left image), located 400
kilometers northeast of Bombay and aged at less
than 50,000 years old, could be related to nuclear warfare of
antiquity. No trace of any meteoric material, etc., has been found
at the site or in the vicinity, and this is the world’s only known
“impact” crater in basalt. Indications of great shock (from a
pressure exceeding 600,000 atmospheres) and intense, abrupt heat (indicated
by basalt glass spherules) can be ascertained from the site.
With the apparent discovery of this radiated area, parallels were
quick drawn to the Mahabharata, the Indian epic. It reads:
... (it was) a single projectile Charged with all the power of the Universe. An incandescent column of smoke and flame As bright as the thousand suns Rose in all its
splendor...
...it was an unknown weapon, An iron thunderbolt, A gigantic messenger of death, Which reduced to ashes The entire race of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas.
...The corpses were so burned As to be unrecognizable. The hair and nails fell out; Pottery broke without apparent cause, And the birds turned white.
After a few hours All foodstuffs were infected... ....to escape from this fire The soldiers threw themselves in streams
To wash themselves and their equipment.
Whereas the story of the Mahabharata is
indirect evidence, the other
discoveries in India pose serious problems for those trying to deny
the possibility that this might indeed be evidence of ancient atomic
warfare. Whereas believing in the existence of Atlantis or a highly
advanced civilization that might not have left any trace is one
thing, to suggest that our ancestors might have wiped themselves out
along the same lines we almost did, but only fifty years ago, is a
major paradigm shift. Some skeptics thus stated:
“I am sick and
tired of hearing this, and I cannot find any debunks of this either.
Anyone who can debunk this, or is this really true?”
That is indeed
the question… and an important one. The stakes are high, as one
would expect when facing with the best evidence.
Lonar crater
(click above image to
enlarge)
So, let us discover what might be the best evidence. The first
question is whether a Francis Taylor existed. There is a Francis
Taylor, an American museum director, who died in 1957. He was not an
archaeologist. There is a “Francisco Taylor”, but he is not the
above quoted Francis Taylor.
Not a good start. Skeptics have also wondered whether the ancient
atomic warfare is not a modern invention, to deflect attention from
a serious – modern – atomic contamination. In 1998, it was reported
that an Indian power stations had some major problems. One had an
incident in which 2000 workers became exposed to excess radiation,
300 of which had to be hospitalized.
Surendra Gadekar also investigated the conditions of villagers at
Rawatbhatta in Rajasthan and discovered gross radiation-related
deformities. We note that Rawatbhatta is in the same region as the
discovery of the “ancient warfare” site. But Gadekar did not find
evidence of ancient warfare, but evidence of modern negligence: wood
that had been used in the power plant, had then “somehow” made his
way into society, where it was subsequently used as wood for a fire.
This in itself was a minor incident, but could there have been more
serious incidents, whereby it was decided to deflect attention from
the present to the ancient past?
We thus find that there no newspapers carried the story of the
discovery. The Indian archaeological authorities are not aware of
the story. And there is a government laboratory in Jodhpur,
Rajasthan. Might something have gone wrong in the latter?
The nuclear facility at Rawatbhatta
With the above objections, the case for the best evidence has become
more controversial than a clean-cut case. But in a case such as an
ancient high tech civilization, this should not come as a surprise.
Rome was not built in one day, and arguing for or against the case
of an ancient highly advanced civilization will not take any less
time.
There should also not be a rush to judgment: the case for ancient
warfare in India is currently better than any contradictory
evidence. The bodies of Harappa and Mohenjo Daro remain a mystery,
whether or not the other radioactive site turns out to be modern or
ancient. The anomalous crater adds power to the possibility.
Finally, the fact that all these enigmas are within one general
region (as opposed to scattered across the world) adds further
weight to the case… but then this should be expected if we might
consider this case to be the best evidence.
The problem of the “best evidence” is often that it sounds too good
to be true. That is either because it is, or because it is indeed
the “best evidence”. And only careful analysis of the evidence will
reveal what it is…
|