Though now it is declared as an impact crater, from 1823 when J. E. Alexander pointed out the crater, for almost a century and half the exact type of its origin was a debatable issue. Initially it was thought to be a volcanic crater. In fact the famous geologist G.K. Gilbert in 1896 showed its similarity with the Meteor crater (Barringer crater), Arizona.
He had proposed two hypotheses for origin of the Meteor crater: volcanic and meteorite, and was looking for the evidence so that he can come to an answer. Based on negative results of his primary tests he rejected meteorite origin and declared the Meteor crater to be a volcanic one. Later on in the first decade of the 20th century impact origin of the Meteor crater was proved to be meteorite beyond doubt.
But Daniel Moreau
Barringer, the mining engineer who studied the crater passionately
until his death, had to fight hard for almost 27 years to prove his
point. He lost his fortune and perhaps invited his death also in this
process. Before his death, he saw his theory of impact origin
being vindicated but could not locate the meteorite after spending a
fortune on digging for it. The presence of iron meteorite was confirmed
by physical and chemical analysis after his death.
There were a few studies after but none suggested an impact origin. In 1952 C.A.Cotton in his monographic work entitled as Volcanoes as landscaped forms doubted volcanic origin because of lack of recent volcanic process in Indian sub-continent and thus preferred meteoritic origin for Lonar crater. So a debate started : Is Lonar crater an astrobleme or a geobleme ?
Astrobleme is a scar on Earth created by a non-terrestrial entity while geobleme is a geological structure formed by the terrestrial process on the Earth itself. In 1961 N C Nandy and V B Deo made a thorough survey of the crater site.
They suggested that a crypto-volcanic explosion must be responsible for crater-formation. Usually volcanic explosions are associated with extrusion of lava that is, the molten interior of the Earth and also with the presence of pyroclastic material. On rare occasions there can be a violent explosion caused by steam accumulated under the ground without effusion of lava or formation of pyroclastic material.
Since these two indicators were absent from the Lonar site crypto-volcanic process was suggested for its origin. Also the crater is situated on the Deccan plateau which is famous for its volcanic origin. Thus one might at first relate similar process for the crater. Nandy and Deo also suggested that the crater be formed shortly after the Cretaceous period that is, 60 million years ago. In 1964 Eugene C Lafond conducted a field survey at Lonar and along with Robert S Dietz suggested that the crater must have been an impact crater and originated some 50 thousand years ago. What was the basis for this suggestion ?
First of all they found that the crater is highly circular in diameter and has a characteristic depth-to diameter ratio of an impact crater. The crater has a raised rim, about 20 m above the surrounding. This was another factor pointing towards the impact origin. The surrounding rock dips away from the crater edge at inclinations of 14-27 degrees, one more feature of impact craters. Along with such morphological parameters shock metamorphosis in the rock also tell how the crater is formed.
To look at the rocks drilling into the crater was done. In the drilling done by Nandy and Deo breccia was found. Breccia is another feature of shocked rocks found in impact craters. Thus all these factors were pointing towards impact origin of Lonar crater. Lafond and Dietz also looked at the erosion of the crater site. Longer a site exposed to eroding entities such as wind, water, and temperature, more it erodes or degrades and exposes underlying layers of soil. A geologist can look at these features and estimate age of the site.
Lonar crater has been exposed to the eroding entities. It has a fresh water stream running in that erodes the walls, puts sediments onto the crater floor. Based on the erosion study and sediment accumulated in the crater Lafond and Dietz suggested that crater to be quite young. And it must be formed some 50,000 years ago or at the most in late Pliocene that is, 1.8 million years ago.
The idea of impact origin then became even stronger when V K Nayak of Centre for Advanced Study in Geology, University of Saugar, Madhya Pradesh, India found glassy objects at the crater site. He found glassy objects varying from 1 mm to 5 cm that can be formed by melting and fusion of rock during an impact. In the drilled out material he found breccia with shocked features, broken and twisted plagioclase, feldspars, strongly oxidized basalt.
All these are the features of shock metamorphosis associated with the rock that receives an hypervelocity impact. In 1973, based on the work done by K. Fredriksson of Smithsonian Institute, Washington DC, D.J. Milton of US Geological Survey, California in collaboration with A Dube and M S Balasundaram of Geological Survey of India impact origin of Lonar crater was established.
They discovered breccia with shatter cones and material containing maskelynite. Maskelynite formation requires very high pressure almost 4 times the average atmospheric pressure on the Earth. And this is created only during hypervelocity impact. No volcanic process can form maskelynite. Thus impact origin of Lonar crater was proved. Three other researchers, D Lal, D MacDougall, and L Wilkeing, estimated the age of the crater to be less than 50,000 years using a fission-track dating method.
Then, in 1996, based on properties of impact glasses found at the crater site D Sengupta estimated age of Lonar crater to be about 52,000 years. Further more Fredriksson et al found that geological material of Lonar crater is very similar to the samples of rock brought from impact basins created on basalt surface of the Moon.
This factor and uniqueness of Lonar crater being the only impact crater on the Earth in basalt rock make it an important structure for study of craters in the solar system. This is the prime reason for conserving the crater, which seem to have been neglected by our community in spite of the unique features of the crater.
This ejecta blanket is spread over about 1350m away from the crater rim and slopes away by 2-6°. The uppermost region of ejecta contains the deposits that were melted due to the impact. Ejecta of any crater is an important factor. The way in which ejecta is spread tells about angle of impact. Spreading pattern for ejecta talks about degree of fluidization of the rock, volatile components of the rock. This pattern also depends on the planet gravity and presence or absence of atmosphere.
Thus if we know how these
parameters effect spreading of ejecta then we can conclude about the
conditions of impact on that particular planet. And the best place to
know these parameters is our earth itself. However, hardly a few craters
on the earth are studied well with reference to this point. Lonar
crater has surprisingly well-preserved ejecta. Thus this ejecta
should be studied further and then it should be conserved also. Crater
floor is almost flat and harbours a shallow saline lake.