by Philip Coppens
This article originally appeared in
Fortean Times 151, October 2001
from
PhilipCoppens Website
According
to geological evidence, the Age of Dinosaurs and the
Age
of Man are separated by roughly 60 million years. That
has not deterred the dream-spinners of Hollywood from
supposing that dinosaurs survived into the present (The
Lost World), or that they can be genetically recreated
(Jurassic Park). Other movies in this genre have played
with the idea that, somehow, man and the dinosaurs may
have co-existed. |
Our story has several possible beginnings, but we’ll start on 13 May
1966 in Ica, the capital town of a small Peruvian coastal province,
some 186 miles (300 km) south of the capital Lima. It was the 42nd
birthday of a local physician, Dr Javier Cabrera Darquea and his old
friend, photographer Felix Llosa Romero, had presented him with a
seemingly innocent gift – a curiously marked stone.
Dr Cabrera – who had a long-standing interest in the prehistory of
the region – examined the design on the stone and identified it as a
species of fish that had become extinct millions of years ago. News
of his excitement reached the ears of Carlos and Pablo Soldi,
brothers and well-known collectors of pre-Inca artifacts. They
showed Cabrera thousands of similarly-marked stones found in the
nearby Ocucaje region and told him that they had repeatedly failed
to interest archeologists in investigating the area. Cabrera bought
341 stones from them for the equivalent of UK£30.
Cabrera’s private museum includes a collection of stones belonging
to his father – Bolivia Cabrera, a Spanish aristocrat – gathered
from the fields of the family plantation in the late 1930s. They
resembled his new acquisitions and soon he found another supplier –
a farmer named Basilo Uschuya – and bought many thousands more from
him. By the late 1970s, Cabrera estimates, he had over 11,000 of
these anomalous engraved stones.
The stones vary in size from pebbles to hefty boulders and have a
dark patina into which the designs are incised. They bear an
astonishing variety of images (including some showing bestiality
which have been described as “pornographic”) and Cabrera has
arranged his collection into groups, including star maps, maps of
unidentified lands, scenes of complex surgery, men using telescopes
to observe stars and comets, and what seem to be humans in flying
machines. Here, too, are depictions that challenge the accepted view
of the history of life on Earth.
They show people interacting with
extinct animals; hunting and domesticating a variety of dinosaurs,
in particular the brontosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex, stegosaurs and
flying pterodactyls. According to connoisseurs, the real gem of the
dinosaur series is a scene in which men use hand-axes to kill a
dinosaur.
What impresses, they say, is that the hunters seem to
display a knowledge of the animal’s anatomy in chopping at a
critical nerve centre in the dinosaur’s spine that would inflict a
quick and sudden death.
Cabrera’s medical career was
distinguished – he’d retired as professor and head of the Department
of Medicine at the University of Lima – so it is natural that, at
first, he kept quiet about his ‘dinosaur stones’, preferring to draw
attention to those that displayed advanced scientific knowledge,
such as the astronomical and medical images.
The ‘surgery stones’
imply – if you believe Cabrera’s supporters – that the makers
possessed an advanced knowledge of medicine millions of years before
the earliest modern civilization, for here, in gory detail, are
scenes of heart, liver and kidney transplants, a cesarean-section,
brain operation, sophisticated equipment, acupuncture and genetic
engineering. In short, this highly controversial ‘library in stone’
is an archeological anomaly – a prime example of what the fortean
pioneer Ivan Sanderson called ‘oops-art’ or out-of-place
artifacts.
In the late 1960s – after he had bought thousands of the engraved
stones from the farmer Basilo Uschuya – Cabrera tirelessly promoted
his ‘discovery’, telling anyone who would listen about his
speculations… and it soon came to the attention of revisionists like
Erich von Däniken and Robert Charroux. Predictably, the
Ica
artifacts shot up the hit parade of the ‘ancient astronaut’ school,
which enthusiastically embraces any discovery that can be used to
suggest that a highly-developed ancient culture existed where none
was supposed to; and the more bizarre or anomalous the discovery,
the more likely it was, in their view, to have extraterrestrial
origins.
Riding in the slipstream of von Däniken’s Chariots of the Gods? – a
world-wide best- seller in 1969 – a spate of similar books emerged
in the early 1970s, almost all of them including the Ica enigma.
Most claimed it was clear, if puzzling, evidence of an advanced
civilization from a time before the dinosaurs perished 65 million
years ago. More recently, Creationists – who place biblical ‘truth’
above Darwinian theory – have used the Ica stones to substantiate
their beliefs that the ‘behemoth’ of the Book of Job is, in fact, a
dinosaur. 1 Rejecting the mooted antiquity of the stones, they
believe the stones show, instead, that dinosaurs survived into
relatively modern times, co-existing with early man, and offer proof
of the Genesis account of the Creation some six millennia ago.
According to the reigning scientific opinion, a span of some 60
million years separates the living dinosaurs from our earliest human
ancestors. This huge gap in time, supported by geological evidence
and modern dating methods, makes the idea of the co-existence of
dinosaurs and man hard to entertain scientifically. In addition, the
theoretical consequences of accepting the validity of the Ica stones
are equally difficult. For example, if humans existed that far back,
how did they survive the several global cataclysms that contributed
to the demise of the dinosaurs and huge percentages of other extant
life-forms? If dinosaurs lived into the Modern Era, why did they
suddenly disappear? 2
Then, it seems, the bubble burst. A BBC TV documentary was severely
critical of the Ica stones, drawing the attention of the Peruvian
press and resulting in the arrest of Uschuya by the local
authorities. Interrogated, he soon admitted he had carved the stones
himself; he wanted to bilk the tourists and claimed he never thought
it would get out of hand on such a large scale. After his release,
Uschuya continued to make and sell stones, presumably with official
knowledge.
The Ica stones were a hoax and officially a branch of the tourist
industry. It was over… or was it? When dealing with controversies of
this sort, nothing is ever simple. Believers in the antiquity of the
stones claimed that the farmer admitted to the hoax for a very
simple reason: if the stones were genuine, he had been selling
government possessions. Peruvian law dictates that archeological
discoveries should be turned over to the government and he faced
prison if found guilty. By admitting it was a simple hoax, the
farmer was let off the hook… and was able to provide his family with
an income. When von Däniken visited the farmer in 1973, Uschuya
confirmed to him that he had faked the stones; but later on, in an
interview with the German journalist Andreas Fischer, Uschuya
claimed the opposite. They were genuine, he insisted, and he
admitted to a hoax to avoid imprisonment.
It is sometimes alleged against Cabrera that he colluded in the
making of fakes and must have profited from them but there is no
evidence of that. In any case, Cabrera’s original motive, to
preserve the stones, is clear from the record. Along with the Soldi
brothers, he tried to attract the attention of a top-level
archeological investigation into what he believed was a genuine
pre-Incan mystery. The Soldis’ interest began in 1961 when,
according to Herman Buse, the Ica River flooded and,
“uncovered in
the Ocucaje region a large number of engraved stones which ever
since have been an object of commerce for the huaqueros who found
them.” 3
Also interested in the objects was an architect,
Santiago Agurto
Calvo, then rector of the Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria, who
bought many and, in 1966, began excavating pre-Inca tombs around
Ocucaje. In an article that year, he described the designs as
“Unidentifiable things, insects,
fish, birds, cats, fabulous creatures and human beings [..] in
elaborate and fantastic compositions.” 4
In 1968, Calvo donated a great number of
engraved stones to the Ica museum but failed to have the province’s
cultural department declare the Ocucaje region a special preserve to
prevent the illegal removal of ancient objects.
The
earliest Peruvian artifacts seem to date back to around 20,000 years
ago, and discoveries of engraved stones in the Ica region go back to
Spanish records of the mid-15th century. The curator of the Ica
museum accepted Calvo’s collection at first as examples of pre-Inca
burial art, but they were withdrawn from open display in 1970, when
Cabrera’s ideas gained international notoriety. When Cabrera visited
the museum to compare his artifacts with Calvo’s, the curator said
he withdrew them because he now believed the huaqueros (grave-
robbers) had made them.
Despite Uschuya’s damning admission, Cabrera continued to feed the
“cult of the dinosaur stones” – he called them ‘gliptoliths’ – and
became their biggest promoter. He put his collection on display in
his house. Shelves line every wall, organized by subject: the races
of the planet, ancient animals, lost continents, etc. Arguing for
their genuine origins cast Cabrera into the camp of the von Dänikenites; this is both comical and ironic as
von Däniken himself
has written that he believes the stones are most likely fakes.
Cabrera devoted more and more time to deciphering the images and
came to astonishing conclusions “in strange and difficult
circumstances”.
Cabrera considered that his hypothetical ancient people – Gliptolithic Man – had larger brains than ours (even though no
skeletal remains exist) and were therefore more intelligent than us.
These humans supposedly used a form of concentrated psychic energy
with which they were able to influence celestial events, and record
on their stones, the approach of a great comet. Further, he believed
that some of the ‘machines’ depicted look like spacecraft and
probably travelled through space “without consuming fuel.” Other
designs echoed the great images laid out on the plains of Nazca –
so, he concluded that Nazca really was an ancient spaceport.
Now, Cabrera ascends into a realm all his own, leaving behind his
puzzled and more conventional colleagues for the increasing
isolation of his contemplation among the strange stones. He believes
he has come to know what they are saying.
“I can only deduce,” he writes,
“that the men who carved these stones co-existed with these
animals. This means, of course, that man is at least 405 million
years old.”
According to him, Gliptolithic Man came
to Earth to genetically engineer the ancestors of the human race and
left Earth before the impact of the Great Comet 65 million years
ago, leaving their intellectual legacy on indestructible stones.
Cabrera theorized that they took off from the Nazca plains – their
craft fired from electromagnetic launchers – to travel to a planet
in
the Pleiades. Some of the stones, he says, show the hemispheres
of that distant planet as well as other places in the Universe where
life existed… which would imply a fair bit of space traffic prior to
the catastrophe.
Cabrera’s reading of the stones has little support; especially as
the engraved images lend themselves to other, less dramatic,
interpretations and there is not enough corroborating detail to
substantiate any of them. For example, even if we assume they are
genuine and millions of years old, they do not necessarily contain
the type of information Cabrera maintains; the heart and brain
transplants could just as well be mutilations or acts of
cannibalism; and the “flying machines” resemble birds more than
high-tech craft. The American archeologist-publisher David Hatcher
Childress said, half in jest, that the scene showing ancients using
telescopes could equally show them playing a game of prehistoric
tennis. 5
On 25 February 1996, NBC TV showed a documentary titled The
Mysterious Origins of Man. It marshaled evidence seeming to support
the idea that there have been civilizations far older than the
earliest accepted ones and that the eras of man and the dinosaurs
overlapped. Neil Steede – an independent archeologist and director
of the Early Sites Research Society – was one of its researchers
who, in 1995, travelled throughout Southern America, gathering
material for the programme. He investigated the Ica stones first
hand, but thought they should not be included in the original
documentary because they did not add any scientific weight to the
debate.
In 1997, the documentary’s producer, Bill Cote, decided to cash in
on two controversial items dropped from the original broadcast. The
segment concerning the Ica stones was called Jurassic Art and was
marketed for cable television and the video sales market. The
production centered on Steede’s research as he was the latest
archeologist to investigate the collection. When Steede met
Basilo
Uschuya, the farmer confirmed that he had engraved the stones from
drawings that Cabrera had brought to him. Why? “Making these stones
is easier than farming the land.” Uschuya stated that Cabrera had
about 5000 ‘genuine’ stones – ie. stones that Uschuya himself had
not made – and that he had not fabricated all of the others,
contrary to what he had previously stated. We have no clues as to
who else might be making these stones.
Cabrera explained Uschuya’s implication by admitting that a large
number of stones had indeed been copied, but they were only for sale
to tourists. There is of course little harm in creating replicas; a
position most museums will be happy to agree with. Doubters will
argue that Cabrera only confessed to his part in these forged stones
when faced with his accomplice’s statement – so how can we rely on
any of his other statements? We also wonder whether Cabrera had
asked anyone else to fabricate stones. Cabrera continues to maintain
that his stones are genuine and that there is still a hoard of
genuine stones, whose secret location is guarded by Uschuya and
others.
Cabrera claims he was shown a cave in
which the cache of stones had remained hidden for millions of years.
This cave was revealed, he says, after a severe rainstorm washed
open a new area near the Ica river. (This may or may not be the
event referred to by Herman Buse in 1965.) Cabrera remains
tight-lipped on who took him to the cave and as no maps or pictures
of it exist we have only Cabrera’s word for it. Cabrera has stated
that he hopes it will not be found. Even Erich von Däniken, who
describes Cabrera as a “warm friend”, was denied the privilege.
Steede, who offered to be blindfolded throughout the journey to the
cave, was also rebuffed and now believes the cave never existed.
Surely, you ask, couldn’t the matter be settled once and for all by
dating the stones? Unfortunately, though some testing was done, the
results remain inconclusive. Cabrera himself sent stones to the
Universities of Lima (Peru) and Bonn (Germany) and to NASA scientist
(and ancient astronaut buff) Joseph Blum. At Bonn, a Professor Frenchen apparently confirmed that the stones were andesite (an
extremely hard volcanic rock composed mostly of silica) and that the
oxidized patina on their surface indicated “significant” age.
In 1967, Cabrera asked friend Eric Wolf, a mining engineer, to
arrange an analysis and published the results in his book. The
stones were indeed andesite, worn smooth in ancient rivers.
“I have
not found any notable or irregular wear on the edges of the
incisions,” Wolf notes, concluding: “These etchings were executed
not long before they were deposited in graves or other places where
they were discovered.” 6
Cabrera adds, specifically, that “the
coating of natural oxidation covers the incisions as well.” This
would suggest the stones were indeed ancient. However, this has to
be balanced by the first-hand observation by Neil Steede that, even
though the stones he examined did have this patina, there was no
patina in the grooves. This suggests that while the stones were
certainly very old, the carvings were clearly of far more recent
origin.
While some investigators claim that they were refused permission to
see the Calco collection in the Museum of Ica stash, Neil Steede was
granted access. He concluded that these “definitely genuine” stones
show a finer workmanship and have less deep cuts than Cabrera’s
stones. This is a clear indication of a more highly skilled
manufacturer than Cabrera’s artisan. Furthermore, they are
restricted to depicting conventional humans and existing animals,
not extinct animals; nor do they include any examples of the more
exotic motifs of the Cabrera stones.
In the same year that the Mysterious Origins of Man documentary
aired, the German cable channel Kabel 1 broadcast its own
investigation.7 The team had filmed secretly as
Cabrera took them
into one of his ‘secret’ rooms. Here, instead of incised stones,
were astonishing clay sculptures: small dinosaurs crawling out of an
egg, kangaroos, people with odd-shaped heads and other similar
themes. The team decided to confront Basilo Uschuya with this new
footage. He claimed to have made these sculptures as well, for what
in his opinion was a minimum salary, and showed the team such a
sculpture, which seemed indistinguishable from those in Cabrera’s
secret room.
The story became stranger when, that same year, Erich von Däniken
launched the German version of his book Arrival of the Gods, in
which he reported on his 1996 trip to Peru… and said that Cabrera
had allowed him to visit and photograph the figurines! Von Däniken
stated that he was first shown these clay figures during his visit
in 1983. The point is that, unlike the stones, these clay figurines
can be tested. Von Däniken sent one to the University of Zurich for
carbon-dating and they reported that the figurine was modern. His
fellow researcher, Johannes Fiebag, sent two other samples to the
University of Weimar who, likewise, concluded that the samples were
“relatively young” and still contained water. Conclusion: these
figurines were not “a hundred thousand” years old, as Cabrera
claimed; they could have been made 20 years ago.
It is quite possible for the engraved stones, if authentic, to have
a simple anthropological origin. An alternative explanation – not
considered by Cabrera or others – is that the engravings are votive
renderings by the tribe’s shaman; after all, the dream-flight of the
shaman is, in many cultures, linked to the flight of birds. Could
not a shaman have picked up a dinosaur bone (which can be found
easily in the area), entered a trance, connected with the bone’s
previous owner and seen the dinosaur age in a vision?
It seems increasingly likely that the Ica stones have been
fabricated, but it is difficult to believe that they are all –
estimates run to 50,000 pieces – made by one poor, uneducated
farmer. No independent study has been made, if only to separate any
possibly authentic artifacts from the fakes. Nor do we know to what
extent Cabrera’s interpretations have been based on any of the
fakes. The one researcher who has known Cabrera the longest,
Erich
von Däniken, has repeatedly stated that some stones are definitely
fakes. He has also cast doubt on the origins of the entire
collection. In the end, perhaps von Däniken understands Cabrera’s
motive best. He is convinced Cabrera tells stories:
“And stories is
the right word, for they do not fit in with any scientific scheme of
things. The old man uses engravings which he must know are fake to
substantiate his beliefs. Why? Has he become so enamoured of his own
theories that he thinks imitations will back them up?”
8
Cabrera’s interest in medicine and
archeology might have made him
susceptible to an ingenious fraud, but if so he is not the one who
has profited from it. Or perhaps he has fooled himself, seeing
evidence of his wishful thinking everywhere. In 1966, the media were
rife with the theme of men and dinosaurs interacting, especially in
the movie One Million Year BC (1966). Was Cabrera inspired by this?
Or was he inspired by the so-called ‘Acambaro figurines’, named
after their place of origin in Mexico where, in 1925, Waldemar
Julsrud, a Danish storekeeper, found hundreds of clay figurines of
dinosaurs which – like their Ica counterparts some 40 years later –
are cavorting with men? 9 Clearly, more research must be done to
settle the doubts about the Ica stones.
Now 77 years old, Cabrera remains the sole custodian of the enigma
and seems to enjoy the position. Without giving anything away, he
still offers a jovial welcome to visitors to the Museo Cabrera – his
own Jurassic Library. It is, he is convinced, “the most important
legacy of our time.”
In
1977, two producers for BBC TV travelled to Peru to film a number of
stories for a programme called ‘Pathways to the Gods’, in the
Chronicle series. Tony Morrison and Ray Sutcliffe, who
specialize in
film reportage from South America, were chiefly interested in
ancient trackways and the Nazca lines, but included the mystery of
the Ica stones. Morrison – who has visited Peru on a regular basis
since 1961 – went on to write the book Pathways to the Gods (1978).
He was told by local informants that, despite the esteem with which
Cabrera was originally regarded, his ‘crazy’ ideas had isolated him
and created some bad feeling in the community Sutcliffe told FT that
they had located and filmed Basilo Uschuya, the only forger of the
stones ever identified.
Uschuya’s homestead stood out from those
surrounding it as the only one with a TV mast and an electricity
generator. Far from being an illiterate peasant, Sutcliffe said
Uschuya was intelligent, proud of his achievement and had “a great
sense of humour.” He proved it to the TV crew by taking a fresh
stone about an inch a half long – its patina the result of being
baked in cow dung and massaged with boot polish – powered up his
dentist’s drill and carved an ‘ancient’ legend of ‘BBC TV’. Today,
the stone sits on Sutcliffe’s desk as one of the most unusual
paperweights in the world.
Note: since this article was written, Dr. Javier Cabrera
has passed away.
NOTES
1. See, for example, Ankerberg
Theological Institute
2. According to some, of course, they didn’t all disappear.
Cryptozoological books often argue for the possible survival of
dinosaurs in remote parts of Africa or elsewhere. And,
everyone’s favourite lake-monster, Nessie, has also been
identified (partly in jest) as a remnant of a Jurassic species.
3. Herman Buse, Introduccion al Peru (1965).
4. Santiago Agurto Calvo, ‘Las piedras mágicas de Ocucaje’ in El
Comercio (supplement) 11 Dec 1966.
5. David Hatcher Childress, Lost Cities and Ancient Mysteries of
South America (1990), p50.
6. Cabrera, The Message of the Engraved Stones of Ica, pp40-41.
7. Kabel 1, 7 August 1997.
8. Erich von Däniken, Arrival of the Gods (Element Books, 1998),
p64. Von Däniken claims he broke an arm off one of the figurines
for dating, adding “May Cabrera and the ancient gods of Peru
forgive me!”
9. A study of the Acambaro figurines is being prepared for a
future FT.
|