| 
			 
 
 
  
			by Philip Coppens 
			This article originally appeared in
			 
			Fortean Times 151, October 2001 
			from
			
			PhilipCoppens Website
 
				
					
						| 
						According 
						to geological evidence, the Age of Dinosaurs and the 
						Age 
						of Man are separated by roughly 60 million years. That 
						has not deterred the dream-spinners of Hollywood from 
						supposing that dinosaurs survived into the present (The 
						Lost World), or that they can be genetically recreated 
						(Jurassic Park). Other movies in this genre have played 
						with the idea that, somehow, man and the dinosaurs may 
						have co-existed.  |  
			Our story has several possible beginnings, but we’ll start on 13 May 
			1966 in Ica, the capital town of a small Peruvian coastal province, 
			some 186 miles (300 km) south of the capital Lima. It was the 42nd 
			birthday of a local physician, Dr Javier Cabrera Darquea and his old 
			friend, photographer Felix Llosa Romero, had presented him with a 
			seemingly innocent gift – a curiously marked stone.
 
 Dr Cabrera – who had a long-standing interest in the prehistory of 
			the region – examined the design on the stone and identified it as a 
			species of fish that had become extinct millions of years ago. News 
			of his excitement reached the ears of Carlos and Pablo Soldi, 
			brothers and well-known collectors of pre-Inca artifacts. They 
			showed Cabrera thousands of similarly-marked stones found in the 
			nearby Ocucaje region and told him that they had repeatedly failed 
			to interest archeologists in investigating the area. Cabrera bought 
			341 stones from them for the equivalent of UK£30.
 
 Cabrera’s private museum includes a collection of stones belonging 
			to his father – Bolivia Cabrera, a Spanish aristocrat – gathered 
			from the fields of the family plantation in the late 1930s. They 
			resembled his new acquisitions and soon he found another supplier – 
			a farmer named Basilo Uschuya – and bought many thousands more from 
			him. By the late 1970s, Cabrera estimates, he had over 11,000 of 
			these anomalous engraved stones.
 
 The stones vary in size from pebbles to hefty boulders and have a 
			dark patina into which the designs are incised. They bear an 
			astonishing variety of images (including some showing bestiality 
			which have been described as “pornographic”) and Cabrera has 
			arranged his collection into groups, including star maps, maps of 
			unidentified lands, scenes of complex surgery, men using telescopes 
			to observe stars and comets, and what seem to be humans in flying 
			machines. Here, too, are depictions that challenge the accepted view 
			of the history of life on Earth.
 
			  
			They show people interacting with 
			extinct animals; hunting and domesticating a variety of dinosaurs, 
			in particular the brontosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex, stegosaurs and 
			flying pterodactyls. According to connoisseurs, the real gem of the 
			dinosaur series is a scene in which men use hand-axes to kill a 
			dinosaur.  
			  
			What impresses, they say, is that the hunters seem to 
			display a knowledge of the animal’s anatomy in chopping at a 
			critical nerve centre in the dinosaur’s spine that would inflict a 
			quick and sudden death. 
			 
			Cabrera’s medical career was 
			distinguished – he’d retired as professor and head of the Department 
			of Medicine at the University of Lima – so it is natural that, at 
			first, he kept quiet about his ‘dinosaur stones’, preferring to draw 
			attention to those that displayed advanced scientific knowledge, 
			such as the astronomical and medical images.  
			  
			The ‘surgery stones’ 
			imply – if you believe Cabrera’s supporters – that the makers 
			possessed an advanced knowledge of medicine millions of years before 
			the earliest modern civilization, for here, in gory detail, are 
			scenes of heart, liver and kidney transplants, a cesarean-section, 
			brain operation, sophisticated equipment, acupuncture and genetic 
			engineering. In short, this highly controversial ‘library in stone’ 
			is an archeological anomaly – a prime example of what the fortean 
			pioneer Ivan Sanderson called ‘oops-art’ or out-of-place 
			artifacts.
 In the late 1960s – after he had bought thousands of the engraved 
			stones from the farmer Basilo Uschuya – Cabrera tirelessly promoted 
			his ‘discovery’, telling anyone who would listen about his 
			speculations… and it soon came to the attention of revisionists like 
			Erich von Däniken and Robert Charroux. Predictably, the 
			Ica 
			artifacts shot up the hit parade of the ‘ancient astronaut’ school, 
			which enthusiastically embraces any discovery that can be used to 
			suggest that a highly-developed ancient culture existed where none 
			was supposed to; and the more bizarre or anomalous the discovery, 
			the more likely it was, in their view, to have extraterrestrial 
			origins.
 
 Riding in the slipstream of von Däniken’s Chariots of the Gods? – a 
			world-wide best- seller in 1969 – a spate of similar books emerged 
			in the early 1970s, almost all of them including the Ica enigma. 
			Most claimed it was clear, if puzzling, evidence of an advanced 
			civilization from a time before the dinosaurs perished 65 million 
			years ago. More recently, Creationists – who place biblical ‘truth’ 
			above Darwinian theory – have used the Ica stones to substantiate 
			their beliefs that the ‘behemoth’ of the Book of Job is, in fact, a 
			dinosaur. 1 Rejecting the mooted antiquity of the stones, they 
			believe the stones show, instead, that dinosaurs survived into 
			relatively modern times, co-existing with early man, and offer proof 
			of the Genesis account of the Creation some six millennia ago.
 
 According to the reigning scientific opinion, a span of some 60 
			million years separates the living dinosaurs from our earliest human 
			ancestors. This huge gap in time, supported by geological evidence 
			and modern dating methods, makes the idea of the co-existence of 
			dinosaurs and man hard to entertain scientifically. In addition, the 
			theoretical consequences of accepting the validity of the Ica stones 
			are equally difficult. For example, if humans existed that far back, 
			how did they survive the several global cataclysms that contributed 
			to the demise of the dinosaurs and huge percentages of other extant 
			life-forms? If dinosaurs lived into the Modern Era, why did they 
			suddenly disappear? 2
 
 Then, it seems, the bubble burst. A BBC TV documentary was severely 
			critical of the Ica stones, drawing the attention of the Peruvian 
			press and resulting in the arrest of Uschuya by the local 
			authorities. Interrogated, he soon admitted he had carved the stones 
			himself; he wanted to bilk the tourists and claimed he never thought 
			it would get out of hand on such a large scale. After his release, 
			Uschuya continued to make and sell stones, presumably with official 
			knowledge.
 
 The Ica stones were a hoax and officially a branch of the tourist 
			industry. It was over… or was it? When dealing with controversies of 
			this sort, nothing is ever simple. Believers in the antiquity of the 
			stones claimed that the farmer admitted to the hoax for a very 
			simple reason: if the stones were genuine, he had been selling 
			government possessions. Peruvian law dictates that archeological 
			discoveries should be turned over to the government and he faced 
			prison if found guilty. By admitting it was a simple hoax, the 
			farmer was let off the hook… and was able to provide his family with 
			an income. When von Däniken visited the farmer in 1973, Uschuya 
			confirmed to him that he had faked the stones; but later on, in an 
			interview with the German journalist Andreas Fischer, Uschuya 
			claimed the opposite. They were genuine, he insisted, and he 
			admitted to a hoax to avoid imprisonment.
 
 It is sometimes alleged against Cabrera that he colluded in the 
			making of fakes and must have profited from them but there is no 
			evidence of that. In any case, Cabrera’s original motive, to 
			preserve the stones, is clear from the record. Along with the Soldi 
			brothers, he tried to attract the attention of a top-level 
			archeological investigation into what he believed was a genuine 
			pre-Incan mystery. The Soldis’ interest began in 1961 when, 
			according to Herman Buse, the Ica River flooded and,
 
				
				“uncovered in 
			the Ocucaje region a large number of engraved stones which ever 
			since have been an object of commerce for the huaqueros who found 
			them.” 3 
			Also interested in the objects was an architect, 
			Santiago Agurto 
			Calvo, then rector of the Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria, who 
			bought many and, in 1966, began excavating pre-Inca tombs around 
			Ocucaje. In an article that year, he described the designs as  
				
				“Unidentifiable things, insects, 
				fish, birds, cats, fabulous creatures and human beings [..] in 
				elaborate and fantastic compositions.” 4  
			In 1968, Calvo donated a great number of 
			engraved stones to the Ica museum but failed to have the province’s 
			cultural department declare the Ocucaje region a special preserve to 
			prevent the illegal removal of ancient objects.
 
  The 
			earliest Peruvian artifacts seem to date back to around 20,000 years 
			ago, and discoveries of engraved stones in the Ica region go back to 
			Spanish records of the mid-15th century. The curator of the Ica 
			museum accepted Calvo’s collection at first as examples of pre-Inca 
			burial art, but they were withdrawn from open display in 1970, when 
			Cabrera’s ideas gained international notoriety. When Cabrera visited 
			the museum to compare his artifacts with Calvo’s, the curator said 
			he withdrew them because he now believed the huaqueros (grave- 
			robbers) had made them. 
 Despite Uschuya’s damning admission, Cabrera continued to feed the 
			“cult of the dinosaur stones” – he called them ‘gliptoliths’ – and 
			became their biggest promoter. He put his collection on display in 
			his house. Shelves line every wall, organized by subject: the races 
			of the planet, ancient animals, lost continents, etc. Arguing for 
			their genuine origins cast Cabrera into the camp of the von Dänikenites; this is both comical and ironic as 
			von Däniken himself 
			has written that he believes the stones are most likely fakes. 
			Cabrera devoted more and more time to deciphering the images and 
			came to astonishing conclusions “in strange and difficult 
			circumstances”.
 
 Cabrera considered that his hypothetical ancient people – Gliptolithic Man – had larger brains than ours (even though no 
			skeletal remains exist) and were therefore more intelligent than us. 
			These humans supposedly used a form of concentrated psychic energy 
			with which they were able to influence celestial events, and record 
			on their stones, the approach of a great comet. Further, he believed 
			that some of the ‘machines’ depicted look like spacecraft and 
			probably travelled through space “without consuming fuel.” Other 
			designs echoed the great images laid out on the plains of Nazca – 
			so, he concluded that Nazca really was an ancient spaceport.
 
 Now, Cabrera ascends into a realm all his own, leaving behind his 
			puzzled and more conventional colleagues for the increasing 
			isolation of his contemplation among the strange stones. He believes 
			he has come to know what they are saying.
 
				
				“I can only deduce,” he writes, 
				“that the men who carved these stones co-existed with these 
				animals. This means, of course, that man is at least 405 million 
				years old.”  
			According to him, Gliptolithic Man came 
			to Earth to genetically engineer the ancestors of the human race and 
			left Earth before the impact of the Great Comet 65 million years 
			ago, leaving their intellectual legacy on indestructible stones. 
			Cabrera theorized that they took off from the Nazca plains – their 
			craft fired from electromagnetic launchers – to travel to a planet 
			in 
			the Pleiades. Some of the stones, he says, show the hemispheres 
			of that distant planet as well as other places in the Universe where 
			life existed… which would imply a fair bit of space traffic prior to 
			the catastrophe.
 Cabrera’s reading of the stones has little support; especially as 
			the engraved images lend themselves to other, less dramatic, 
			interpretations and there is not enough corroborating detail to 
			substantiate any of them. For example, even if we assume they are 
			genuine and millions of years old, they do not necessarily contain 
			the type of information Cabrera maintains; the heart and brain 
			transplants could just as well be mutilations or acts of 
			cannibalism; and the “flying machines” resemble birds more than 
			high-tech craft. The American archeologist-publisher David Hatcher 
			Childress said, half in jest, that the scene showing ancients using 
			telescopes could equally show them playing a game of prehistoric 
			tennis. 5
 
 On 25 February 1996, NBC TV showed a documentary titled The 
			Mysterious Origins of Man. It marshaled evidence seeming to support 
			the idea that there have been civilizations far older than the 
			earliest accepted ones and that the eras of man and the dinosaurs 
			overlapped. Neil Steede – an independent archeologist and director 
			of the Early Sites Research Society – was one of its researchers 
			who, in 1995, travelled throughout Southern America, gathering 
			material for the programme. He investigated the Ica stones first 
			hand, but thought they should not be included in the original
			documentary because they did not add any scientific weight to the 
			debate.
 
 In 1997, the documentary’s producer, Bill Cote, decided to cash in 
			on two controversial items dropped from the original broadcast. The 
			segment concerning the Ica stones was called Jurassic Art and was 
			marketed for cable television and the video sales market. The 
			production centered on Steede’s research as he was the latest 
			archeologist to investigate the collection. When Steede met 
			Basilo 
			Uschuya, the farmer confirmed that he had engraved the stones from 
			drawings that Cabrera had brought to him. Why? “Making these stones 
			is easier than farming the land.” Uschuya stated that Cabrera had 
			about 5000 ‘genuine’ stones – ie. stones that Uschuya himself had 
			not made – and that he had not fabricated all of the others, 
			contrary to what he had previously stated. We have no clues as to 
			who else might be making these stones.
 
 Cabrera explained Uschuya’s implication by admitting that a large 
			number of stones had indeed been copied, but they were only for sale 
			to tourists. There is of course little harm in creating replicas; a 
			position most museums will be happy to agree with. Doubters will 
			argue that Cabrera only confessed to his part in these forged stones 
			when faced with his accomplice’s statement – so how can we rely on 
			any of his other statements? We also wonder whether Cabrera had 
			asked anyone else to fabricate stones. Cabrera continues to maintain 
			that his stones are genuine and that there is still a hoard of 
			genuine stones, whose secret location is guarded by Uschuya and 
			others.
 
			  
			Cabrera claims he was shown a cave in 
			which the cache of stones had remained hidden for millions of years. 
			This cave was revealed, he says, after a severe rainstorm washed 
			open a new area near the Ica river. (This may or may not be the 
			event referred to by Herman Buse in 1965.) Cabrera remains 
			tight-lipped on who took him to the cave and as no maps or pictures 
			of it exist we have only Cabrera’s word for it. Cabrera has stated 
			that he hopes it will not be found. Even Erich von Däniken, who 
			describes Cabrera as a “warm friend”, was denied the privilege.
			Steede, who offered to be blindfolded throughout the journey to the 
			cave, was also rebuffed and now believes the cave never existed.
 Surely, you ask, couldn’t the matter be settled once and for all by 
			dating the stones? Unfortunately, though some testing was done, the 
			results remain inconclusive. Cabrera himself sent stones to the 
			Universities of Lima (Peru) and Bonn (Germany) and to NASA scientist 
			(and ancient astronaut buff) Joseph Blum. At Bonn, a Professor Frenchen apparently confirmed that the stones were andesite (an 
			extremely hard volcanic rock composed mostly of silica) and that the 
			oxidized patina on their surface indicated “significant” age.
 
 In 1967, Cabrera asked friend Eric Wolf, a mining engineer, to 
			arrange an analysis and published the results in his book. The 
			stones were indeed andesite, worn smooth in ancient rivers.
 
				
				“I have 
			not found any notable or irregular wear on the edges of the 
			incisions,” Wolf notes, concluding: “These etchings were executed 
			not long before they were deposited in graves or other places where 
			they were discovered.” 6 
				 
			Cabrera adds, specifically, that “the 
			coating of natural oxidation covers the incisions as well.” This 
			would suggest the stones were indeed ancient. However, this has to 
			be balanced by the first-hand observation by Neil Steede that, even 
			though the stones he examined did have this patina, there was no 
			patina in the grooves. This suggests that while the stones were 
			certainly very old, the carvings were clearly of far more recent 
			origin. 
			While some investigators claim that they were refused permission to 
			see the Calco collection in the Museum of Ica stash, Neil Steede was 
			granted access. He concluded that these “definitely genuine” stones 
			show a finer workmanship and have less deep cuts than Cabrera’s 
			stones. This is a clear indication of a more highly skilled 
			manufacturer than Cabrera’s artisan. Furthermore, they are 
			restricted to depicting conventional humans and existing animals, 
			not extinct animals; nor do they include any examples of the more 
			exotic motifs of the Cabrera stones.
 
 In the same year that the Mysterious Origins of Man documentary 
			aired, the German cable channel Kabel 1 broadcast its own 
			investigation.7 The team had filmed secretly as 
			Cabrera took them 
			into one of his ‘secret’ rooms. Here, instead of incised stones, 
			were astonishing clay sculptures: small dinosaurs crawling out of an 
			egg, kangaroos, people with odd-shaped heads and other similar 
			themes. The team decided to confront Basilo Uschuya with this new 
			footage. He claimed to have made these sculptures as well, for what 
			in his opinion was a minimum salary, and showed the team such a 
			sculpture, which seemed indistinguishable from those in Cabrera’s 
			secret room.
 
 The story became stranger when, that same year, Erich von Däniken 
			launched the German version of his book Arrival of the Gods, in 
			which he reported on his 1996 trip to Peru… and said that Cabrera 
			had allowed him to visit and photograph the figurines! Von Däniken 
			stated that he was first shown these clay figures during his visit 
			in 1983. The point is that, unlike the stones, these clay figurines 
			can be tested. Von Däniken sent one to the University of Zurich for 
			carbon-dating and they reported that the figurine was modern. His 
			fellow researcher, Johannes Fiebag, sent two other samples to the 
			University of Weimar who, likewise, concluded that the samples were 
			“relatively young” and still contained water. Conclusion: these 
			figurines were not “a hundred thousand” years old, as Cabrera 
			claimed; they could have been made 20 years ago.
 
 It is quite possible for the engraved stones, if authentic, to have 
			a simple anthropological origin. An alternative explanation – not 
			considered by Cabrera or others – is that the engravings are votive 
			renderings by the tribe’s shaman; after all, the dream-flight of the 
			shaman is, in many cultures, linked to the flight of birds. Could 
			not a shaman have picked up a dinosaur bone (which can be found 
			easily in the area), entered a trance, connected with the bone’s 
			previous owner and seen the dinosaur age in a vision?
 
 It seems increasingly likely that the Ica stones have been 
			fabricated, but it is difficult to believe that they are all – 
			estimates run to 50,000 pieces – made by one poor, uneducated 
			farmer. No independent study has been made, if only to separate any 
			possibly authentic artifacts from the fakes. Nor do we know to what 
			extent Cabrera’s interpretations have been based on any of the 
			fakes. The one researcher who has known Cabrera the longest, 
			Erich 
			von Däniken, has repeatedly stated that some stones are definitely 
			fakes. He has also cast doubt on the origins of the entire 
			collection. In the end, perhaps von Däniken understands Cabrera’s 
			motive best. He is convinced Cabrera tells stories:
 
				
				“And stories is 
			the right word, for they do not fit in with any scientific scheme of 
			things. The old man uses engravings which he must know are fake to 
			substantiate his beliefs. Why? Has he become so enamoured of his own 
			theories that he thinks imitations will back them up?” 
				8 
			Cabrera’s interest in medicine and 
			archeology might have made him 
			susceptible to an ingenious fraud, but if so he is not the one who 
			has profited from it. Or perhaps he has fooled himself, seeing 
			evidence of his wishful thinking everywhere. In 1966, the media were 
			rife with the theme of men and dinosaurs interacting, especially in 
			the movie One Million Year BC (1966). Was Cabrera inspired by this? 
			Or was he inspired by the so-called ‘Acambaro figurines’, named 
			after their place of origin in Mexico where, in 1925, Waldemar 
			Julsrud, a Danish storekeeper, found hundreds of clay figurines of 
			dinosaurs which – like their Ica counterparts some 40 years later – 
			are cavorting with men? 9 Clearly, more research must be done to 
			settle the doubts about the Ica stones.
 Now 77 years old, Cabrera remains the sole custodian of the enigma 
			and seems to enjoy the position. Without giving anything away, he 
			still offers a jovial welcome to visitors to the Museo Cabrera – his 
			own Jurassic Library. It is, he is convinced, “the most important 
			legacy of our time.”
 
 
  In 
			1977, two producers for BBC TV travelled to Peru to film a number of 
			stories for a programme called ‘Pathways to the Gods’, in the 
			Chronicle series. Tony Morrison and Ray Sutcliffe, who 
			specialize in 
			film reportage from South America, were chiefly interested in 
			ancient trackways and the Nazca lines, but included the mystery of 
			the Ica stones. Morrison – who has visited Peru on a regular basis 
			since 1961 – went on to write the book Pathways to the Gods (1978). 
			He was told by local informants that, despite the esteem with which 
			Cabrera was originally regarded, his ‘crazy’ ideas had isolated him 
			and created some bad feeling in the community Sutcliffe told FT that 
			they had located and filmed Basilo Uschuya, the only forger of the 
			stones ever identified. 
			  
			Uschuya’s homestead stood out from those 
			surrounding it as the only one with a TV mast and an electricity 
			generator. Far from being an illiterate peasant, Sutcliffe said
			Uschuya was intelligent, proud of his achievement and had “a great 
			sense of humour.” He proved it to the TV crew by taking a fresh 
			stone about an inch a half long – its patina the result of being 
			baked in cow dung and massaged with boot polish – powered up his 
			dentist’s drill and carved an ‘ancient’ legend of ‘BBC TV’. Today, 
			the stone sits on Sutcliffe’s desk as one of the most unusual 
			paperweights in the world.
 Note: since this article was written, Dr. Javier Cabrera 
			has passed away.
 
 
			NOTES
 
				
				1. See, for example, Ankerberg 
				Theological Institute2. According to some, of course, they didn’t all disappear. 
				Cryptozoological books often argue for the possible survival of 
				dinosaurs in remote parts of Africa or elsewhere. And, 
				everyone’s favourite lake-monster, Nessie, has also been 
				identified (partly in jest) as a remnant of a Jurassic species.
 3. Herman Buse, Introduccion al Peru (1965).
 4. Santiago Agurto Calvo, ‘Las piedras mágicas de Ocucaje’ in El 
				Comercio (supplement) 11 Dec 1966.
 5. David Hatcher Childress, Lost Cities and Ancient Mysteries of 
				South America (1990), p50.
 6. Cabrera, The Message of the Engraved Stones of Ica, pp40-41.
 7. Kabel 1, 7 August 1997.
 8. Erich von Däniken, Arrival of the Gods (Element Books, 1998), 
				p64. Von Däniken claims he broke an arm off one of the figurines 
				for dating, adding “May Cabrera and the ancient gods of Peru 
				forgive me!”
 9. A study of the Acambaro figurines is being prepared for a 
				future FT.
 
			  |