|
chapter 14
The underlying theme of all you have read is the manipulation of the human mind. You cannot control billions of people with tanks in the streets and soldiers at the door. You can only do it by divide and rule - and by programming the mass consciousness (public opinion) into believing that what you want to do is a good idea or the only option.
Achieve that and people will be knocking on your door demanding that you put cameras in their streets and give more guns and power to the police. Problem-reaction-solution. And what better way to induce more crime than to create a society of ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ dependent on welfare payments and then start dismantling the welfare state? You give people a choice of going without basic needs or of taking someone else’s money and property. And when they do the latter, the victims of the crime and the mass of people who see the reports of the crime demand that “something must be done”. All aspects of society are being used to promote this mental coup d’etat.
The ‘education’ system is not there to inform children and young people, it is there to indoctrinate them; the same with the media and advertising. The tax exempt foundations coordinate the Elite’s ‘education’ policy in the United States schools and universities, and in the United Kingdom this is done, in part, by a secret clique known as the All Souls Group. This meets three times a year at (most appropriately) Rhodes House at Oxford University. Such education policies are designed to turn out clones of the system and world government supporters, although the overwhelming majority of people in the teaching profession will not realize this.
The document says that:
The Bilderberg Group first met in 1954. It is likely that the methods laid out in the document will be inspired by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London and its interconnecting offshoots. Here is a flavour of the content:
That doesn’t describe today’s world, does it? All the main aspects of the coup d’etat are there and we can see this strategy at work every day. When a government is planning to introduce legislation against a target group as part of the plan to enforce conformity and remove freedoms, the process of softening up public opinion against that target group begins months, sometimes years, before there is even a hint of new laws.
The idea is to turn public opinion against the target group through propaganda and engineered events. When the legislation is finally presented, the potential opposition is already either greatly reduced or destroyed altogether. Take the example of the Criminal Justice Bill introduced by the British government in 1994. It was a dreadful piece of work and a tremendous strike against basic freedoms, but it sailed through Parliament with virtually all party support.
One of its many targets were the ‘travellers’, the groups of people who live in mobile homes of many kinds and move between various places throughout the year. They have been dubbed ‘New Age’ travellers by the media. The travellers are not perfect - who is? - but it will be enlightening to look at how they were treated. In the year to eighteen months before the Criminal Justice Bill was announced, you could hardly open a newspaper or watch the TV news without seeing a story which suggested that travellers were a ‘problem’ in need of a ‘solution’.
Police were stopping and harassing the traveller convoys as they moved from site to site; councils were refusing to allow them to cross their borders; conflicts were breaking out between travellers and police as the anger and frustration mounted. All was captured and broadcast on the main television news bulletins. Agents provocateur connected to British Intelligence were in there stirring things up just as the cameras were on the spot, in the way such agencies operate all over the world.
Eighty per cent of people cannot be wrong, can they? Oh yes they can, if they have given their minds away. The other role of opinion polls is to check if the propaganda against a target group is working. Once the opinion polls say that a sufficient majority now believe the target group is a problem and “something must be done”, the legislation (the solution) is taken out of the file and put before Parliament.
This approach has another advantage in
that the potential political opposition, what little there is, fears
the electoral consequences of opposing laws to ‘solve’ a ‘problem’
about which the public has now been programmed to believe that
“something must be done”. Therefore highly controversial legislation
like the Criminal Justice Bill (which removes basic freedoms) goes
through Parliament and into law virtually on the nod. Once this Bill
was making its way into law, suddenly all the “travellers are a problem” stories disappeared and at the time of this
writing, have never reappeared. They will only return when even more
harsh legislation against them is being planned. Until then, public
opinion will go on being softened up to accept legislation against
other target groups on the Elite’s hit list and the public will go
on reacting like robots in exactly the way required. Unless we
choose to take control of our own minds. Organizations like the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (and their brothers and sisters in the United States such as the Stanford Research Institute, and the Rand Corporation) research into how people will react, individually and collectively, to events, changes, and ‘buzz words’. It was Tavistock, according to research that I’ve read,1 which devised the policy of ‘future shocks’, the means by which the collective human mind is bombarded with so many changes, events, and contradicting information that it overloads, switches off, and becomes subservient. This is happening all over the world today, most obviously in the United States and Japan, where the population is being given one event after the other to fill them with fear and insecurity. The aim is to destabilize Japanese society and break its resistance to fundamental change.
The CIA and British Intelligence were experimenting with the effects of the drug LSD in the 1950s, before it was unleashed on the market and destroyed any possibility of substantial positive change emerging from that time. In 1953, the CIA commandeered the entire supply of LSD from the Swiss manufacturers, Sandoz (which was owned by S.G. Warburg of London).
Later they did the same with Eli Lilly when it began to produce LSD in the United States. People were so doped and duped that they thought LSD was a weapon of ‘freedom’. Some still do. I’m not sure the CIA and British Intelligence had that in mind, somehow.
We hear from time to time of ‘revelations’ about intelligence agencies, but how many are real revelations and how many are systematically leaked to divert people from what is really going on? An example: publish a book by a ‘spy’ who names certain people as foreign agents. Hype it up through your controlled media and get the government to vehemently oppose it, so adding to its credibility. Persuade people to accept that the names revealed by the ‘whistle-blower’ are correct and those who were really involved are in the clear. If you want to introduce controversial legislation or a government is being forced to reveal unpleasant information about itself, then under the rules of diversion, this should be done on a day you know another major story is going to break. This lessens the space and prominence given to what you say because of the massive media coverage of the other big story.
And if the authorities didn’t know what was going to occur, why were ‘VIPs’ warned not to take that flight after their seats had been booked? Among them were Pik Botha, the South African minister, and others accompanying him, including the head of BOSS, the South African intelligence agency (which has close ties with the CIA and Mossad). They cancelled their reservations on Flight 103 shortly before departure after a tip-off from intelligence sources.3 Pik Botha told the British businessman, Tiny Rowlands, that these sources were the kind that “couldn’t be dismissed”.4
Libya has been used as a diversion for years. Colonel Gaddafi was portrayed as the monster of monsters, until it became more useful to give that title to George Bush’s old friend, Saddam Hussein. The bombing of Tripoli by US planes flying from British bases in 1986 was part of this. Dozens of Libyan civilians, including children, were murdered by the Americans (with British support) in retaliation for “Libyan terrorism” at a disco in West Berlin, for which, again, there was no evidence, as later conceded by German investigators. I know nothing about Gaddafi for sure, but I have heard suggestions that he’s hated by the US.
There is another view that this “hatred” is a front for CIA terrorist training based in Libya, which, it is said, has honed the skills of the IRA, the Red Brigades, and other terrorist groups. It’s hard to tell, but here I am looking only at the strange connections surrounding the Lockerbie bomb. The man who wrote the paper for Ronald Reagan which proposed a campaign to destroy the Gaddafi regime with lies and disinformation was (by his own admission) the CIA operative, Vincent Cannistraro. He worked for three years on the campaign with Oliver North and this led to the bombing of Tripoli. Who was the man appointed to head the CIA ‘investigation’ into Lockerbie which decided that two Libyans were responsible? It couldn’t be? Yes it could.
The United States and the Elite use the create-a-monster technique all the time to divert attention from the fact that they are installing and pulling the strings of far more extreme regimes throughout the world. There was no talk of monsters and terrorism in 1988 when the USS Vincennes fired a missile ‘by accident’ to shoot down an Iranian passenger jet with 290 on board.5 The Vincennes was in the Persian Gulf to support Saddam Hussein, then America’s friend and ally in the Iraqi war with Iran.
The commander of the ship was ‘severely punished’: he was awarded the Legion of Merit Award by George Bush for “exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding service” and for the “calm and professional atmosphere” under his command during the period the jet was destroyed.6 The stepping-stones strategy is another diversion. The Elite know the goal they are aiming for and the stepping-stones required to manipulate public opinion towards that end. But if they are going to persuade people to accept those stepping stones, each one must be presented in isolation. If once they are seen by the general public as links in a chain leading towards a global centralized tyranny, obviously the game is up.
If you want barcoded human beings linked to a central computer, you must first get them to accept credit and identity cards. You can be even more subtle by announcing first of all that the identity cards will not be compulsory, as Michael Howard did at the Conservative Party Conference in 1994. Shouts of dismay from the audience who want them to be compulsory make you look positively moderate in comparison, and initial opposition from the civil liberties groups is diluted because the government says, “But they are not compulsory; people have the choice”.
Of course, the plan is to make them compulsory and then go on to barcoding, but the stepping-stones diversionary approach demands that this be done in distinct stages, so that people in general don’t realize what is going on. These tactics are used at all levels of society. If you want to develop an area of unspoilt, isolated land, and you announce plans to build a housing estate or industrial complex, it would attract enormous opposition. Instead, the first stage is to propose a road to allow people greater ‘access’ to the area. Once this has been achieved a few buildings begin to appear, then more and more, until you have built, in stages, what you intended all along.
This is one reason why the information in this book and others like it is so important. Once you know the ultimate aims, the stepping-stones towards them become so easy to see.
Thus, the real controllers can stay in the shadows, unreported and unidentified. There are exceptions when you meet a very bright journalist who can see behind the facades. They know they are imprisoned within a media structure which severely limits what they can say and do. But they take every opportunity to get across as much information as they can. I have met a few of those people and they are a joy to talk to. If only that were true of the rest.
Most journalists on local and regional papers and local radio are either time-servers, who are programmed to turn out the same old establishment line without question while thinking their years in the profession make them streetwise, or they are youngsters fresh out of university who have no experience of the world and the manipulation that goes on. There are, I stress, exceptions, but I am speaking generally here. I don’t say this out of condemnation, but as this mindset stands between the events in the world and the way the information about them is communicated to the public, it is important that we know the nature of the filters and the filtering that goes on.
The headline referred to the reporter’s contention that what I said that night about the nature of the New World Order was not new because George Bush had used the same words years before! If that was an isolated example of the thought processes which provide our news, it wouldn’t be a problem. But it isn’t. I could fill another book with stories of my experiences with people bravely claiming to be journalists who have asked questions and written articles that would make a two-year-old look like the peak of maturity.
At the national and international level, the number of journalists knowingly manipulating the human mind is far greater than the local and regional media, but it is still a relative few. The rest just conform to the traditional structure and approach and allow themselves to be manipulated to manipulate their audience. I worked in the BBC Television national newsroom for years and everyone around me appeared to be extremely genuine. Most of them were very nice people who loved their children and would not wish to leave them to face a centralized global dictatorship. But every day they turn out stories which feed their millions of viewers the line the Elite want them to see and hear.
Also, journalists are there to report events. If you can engineer significant events, the journalists will report them. You don’t have to control every journalist to do this; the event will be reported anyway. Most of the time, the background information and explanation of that event will come from official sources. Watch a television news bulletin today if you can, and see where the words the reporter is speaking are overwhelmingly coming from: official sources. So without even manipulating a single journalist, your engineered event, be it a “terrorist bomb” or “economic problem”, is both reported and explained in the way you want.
In BBC Television’s review of 1995, the so called “heavyweight” news presenter, John Humphreys, parroted the government line on Oklahoma and named McVeigh and the militias as the “enemy within” even before there had been a trial! And they call themselves ‘journalists’. It’s unbelievable.
We were told whom he had met that day, and, on one occasion, how he had swum across a river to show his people he was alive and well after the Gulf War. Now we know from a defector from Iraq that it was not the real Saddam, but his stand-in look-alike. The media is being conned day by day and it then cons its audience. Ask 99% of journalists about the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Elite in general, and they will look at you in bewilderment. They won’t even have heard of them, let alone know what their role is.
These networks are supposed to be in ‘competition’ and it is this very ‘competition’ that is part of the ‘independence’ which ensures we enjoy unbiased news. That’s the theory, anyway. The Exposure research came from the work of the American New World Order investigator, Eustace Mullins. From what I read, Eustace and I would have very little in common on most things, but either the people he names were controlling the networks at the time of the article, or they were not.
The following is provable fact: NBC is a subsidiary of RCA, a media conglomerate which appears regularly on the career details of a number of people named throughout this book. Among the NBC directors named in the Mullins article were: John Brademas (CFR, TC, Bil), a director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Peter G. Peterson (CFR), former head of Kuhn, Loeb, and Co (Rothschild), and a former Secretary of Commerce; Robert Cizik, chairman of RCA and of First City Bancorp, which was identified in Congressional testimony as a Rothschild bank; Thomas O. Paine, president of Northrup Co (the big defence contractor) and director of the (Elite-controlled) Institute of Strategic Studies in London; Donald Smiley, a director of two Morgan Companies, Metropolitan Life and US Steel; Thornton Bradshaw, chairman of RCA, director of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Atlantic Richfield Oil, and the Aspen Institute of Humanistic Studies (both of the latter headed by ‘environmentalist’ and elite Bilderberger, Robert O. Anderson).
Clearly the NBC board has considerable Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan influence.
Again, we see the same Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan line-up on the board of the ABC network which, we are told, is independent of NBC. The ABC company was taken over by Cities Communications, whose most prominent director is Robert Roosa (CFR, Bil), senior partner of Brown Brothers Harriman, which has close ties with the Bank of England. Roosa and David Rockefeller are credited with selecting Paul Volcker to chair the Federal Reserve Board.
The CBS board included: William S. Paley (Comm 300), the chairman (for whom Prescott Bush personally organised the money to buy the company); Harold Brown (CFR), executive director of the Trilateral Commission, and former Secretary of the Air Force and Defence; Roswell Gilpatric (CFR, Bil), from the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Cravath, Swaine, and Moore, and former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Henry B. Schnacht, director of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), the Council on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution, and Committee for Economic Development; Michel C. Bergerac, chairman of Revlon, and director of Manufacturers Hanover Bank (Rothschild); James D. Wolfensohn (CFR, TC, Bil), former head of J. Henry Schroder Bank, who has close links with the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, (in 1995, Bill Clinton successfully nominated him to head the World Bank); Franklin A. Thomas (CFR), head of the Ford Foundation; Newton D. Minow (CFR), director of the Rand Corporation and, among many others, the Ditchley Foundation, which is closely linked with the Tavistock Institute in London and the Bilderberg Group.
People connected with research into how the public mind reacts to events and information are on the board of a United States television network? What? Again with CBS, we are looking at the same names at the helm, and all three networks are closely interlocked with the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. How can it possibly be claimed that the three television networks in America, through which the overwhelming majority of Americans get their news, are independent?
They are controlled or strongly influenced by the same people! Look at the potential for recruiting only those producers, journalists, and editors who support your views and aims, and for sacking those who challenge your interference in what is and isn’t shown. Look at the potential for selling a common line on events and news stories to ensure the American people have no other explanations than those you want them to believe. In July 1995, ABC was merged with the Walt Disney empire and the giant Westinghouse Electric made its move to buy CBS. Two months later, Turner Broadcasting, the company behind CNN Television, announced plans to merge with Time Warner.
The deal was struck between the Time Warner chairman, Gerald M. Levin (TC) and Ted Turner (Comm 300), a leading supporter of the new global order. We have seen the history of Time Warner in Chapter 12. The concentration of power gathers pace. The same familiar Elite control the three television networks and America’s main newspapers, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times. This is without even mentioning all the other media outlets and international news agencies (like Reuters) which the Elite control and the agencies run by the major newspapers which feed a common line to the smaller papers via the wire machines and syndicated columnists. The mind manipulation possibilities this offers are just incredible.
Scores of leading US journalists and editors are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission and they are covertly working to that party line in their selection, dissection and presentation of news and information. Typical was a ‘report’ by the famous CBS News anchorman, Walter Cronkite, into the wealth and power of the Rockefellers. He closed by saying that if any family had to have as much power and money as the Rockefellers, it was a good thing it was the Rockefellers.7 Violin, anyone? I am grateful for the research into UK media ownership in the early 1990s by Colonel Barry Turner, which he published in 1992 as a paper entitled “Control of the Communications Media and Conditioning of the Public Mind”. Much of the following information about names and newspapers is thanks to his painstaking work. The leading ‘quality’ newspaper in the UK is the Daily Telegraph.
This is owned through the Hollinger Group by the Canadian, Conrad Black. The group owns more than 200 newspapers and magazines in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Israel, and the group started life as a front company set up by the British intelligence as I explained earlier. Conrad Black is a member of the elite Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group, a Trilateralist, and a member of the Institute for Strategic Studies.
The senior international advisors to the Hollinger Group are Henry Kissinger (CFR, TC, Bil, RIIA, Comm 300) and Lord Carrington (TC, RIIA, Bil, Comm 300). Some members of the Hollinger International Supervisory Board are Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, TC, Bil); Giovanni Agnelli (Bil, Black Nobility, Comm 300); David Brinkley (CFR), news commentator with ABC News; Paul Volker (CFR, TC, Bil), the chairman of the 362 .. .and the truth shall set you fra Federal Reserve Board responsible for Reaganomics and Thatcherism; Lord Rothschild, chairman of Rothschild Holdings; and Lord Hanson, chairman of Hanson plc. On the board of The Daily Telegraph is Evelyn de Rothschild, chairman of the N.M. Rothschild merchant bank. N.M. Rothschild are merchant bankers to the Hollinger Group to complete the cosy relationship.
Murdoch owns newspapers, magazines, and television networks that are estimated to have a potential audience of three billion people. That is without his interests in the film industry. He is now linking in with a global telephone and communications network, MCI, and has made a bid for parts of the vast Berlusconi media empire in Italy. According to The European newspaper he is also planning to substantially increase his media interests across Europe.8 In a feature in The Spotlight newspaper headed: “What is Murdoch Up To And Who Is Backing Him?” the writer Dan McMahan linked the rise of this media mogul to names like Harry Oppenheimer (South Africa, Anglo-American, De Beers), Armand Hammer (Occidental Petroleum), the Bronfman family (who are close to the Hollinger Group and the Anti-Defamation League), and the Rothschilds.9
It is not the front men we need to look at so much as who is behind them pulling their strings. It is they who make the money available and manipulate the politicians to allow great media takeovers and cartels to emerge. With unbelievable hypocrisy, Conrad Black’s Daily Telegraph said of Murdoch’s domain: “This is a huge and potentially dangerous concentration of media power...”10 And the Telegraph owner’s empire is not?
The least radical newspaper in Britain is the one claimed to be most radical: The Guardian, the tome of the mindset I call the Robot Radicals. The founding editor of The Guardian’s ‘rival’, The Independent, was Andreas Whittam Smith. He was a member of the Trilateral Commission during his years at the top of that newspaper. The political ‘choice’ is an illusion and so is the media ‘choice’. Indeed the two are indivisible. When I started to have more and more success in making this suppressed information available to the public, the campaign to discredit me was stepped up. I was delighted in a way, because it proved I am twitching a few nerve ends among those who wish to control the human mind.
The Jewish Chronicle, which parrots words like freedom and truth, began to write outrageous misrepresentations of what I am saying and doing. I was having conversations with the press officer of the Board of Deputies of British Jews - a lovely woman - who was speaking to one David Icke, while she was reading about a very different David Icke in the Jewish Chronicle. Understandably she was confused. I wasn’t because what was happening was so predictable. The sight of a paper like the Chronicle posturing its morality while lying through its teeth is not a pretty one.
In the article were the (barely) one-dimensional clichés about ‘disciples’ and other childish nonsense, but nowhere was there a mention of the Bilderberg Group and its RIIA, CFR, TC network which I had spent much of the evening talking about.
But what is it the Illuminati Protocols say?
And most journalists, probably including Mr Brown, will not have a clue about how they are being used. Someone wrote to me who had read The Robots’ Rebellion and was a daily reader of The Guardian because he thought it had the integrity that others lacked.
He was stunned to read Brown’s article, which he said was a gross misrepresentation of what I am saying and doing. “I thought I could trust The Guardian” he said. You can’t. You can’t trust any of them. It was the same with a ‘journalist’ called Rosemary Carpenter on the Daily Express. She was given access to the information revealed in this book and yet she dismissed it without any checking or research. Mind blowing.
From where do the public get their information about political parties at election time? The controlled media. If the media will not support you, or are vehemently against you, it is virtually impossible to be elected. If you are a politician looking to win or stay in power, you have to listen to what the media is demanding. If you don’t, they will turn against you and even reveal some unpleasant information which they have long known about, but have kept under wraps while you were playing their game. When Rupert Murdoch began to make positive statements about the British Labour leader Tony Blair (Bil) following the ‘untimely’ and sudden death of his predecessor, John Smith, this was considered highly significant for Blair’s chances of becoming prime minister. The sad thing is that it was significant.
Sir Zelman Cowan, another former chairman of the old complaints body, the Press Council, was involved in 1991 with the takeover of the Australian Fairfax Group by Conrad Black’s Hollinger Group. Lord Armstrong, the former head of the Civil Service and cabinet secretary (who went on to become a director of N.M. Rothschild) also joined the board of Carlton Television, which broadcasts to London and the ‘Independent’ television network in the UK. I could go on and on across the UK media, revealing the interconnections between certain names and companies.
Rest assured, however, there is really nothing to worry about. As the then Home Secretary, Douglas Hurd, said in The Financial Times on January 19th 1989: “Broadcasting will not be run by tycoons.” Phew, that’s a relief! I rather prefer the opinion on the true state of affairs within the media of John Swinton, a journalist on the New York Times, who is reported to have told his staff at his retirement dinner:
But here again, we come back to the same theme. The media is our creation. It reflects the collective mind of humanity and if it did not, it could not survive and prosper as it does. We can debate which came first, the collective mind’s attitudes or the programming of those attitudes, but if you read the average tabloid newspaper and then spend an hour in the average bar, you will see that the thought patterns of the paper and the people are largely the same.
Vast numbers of people think and act like a tabloid newspaper. They have allowed themselves to become tabloid thinkers with tabloid minds. We now have tabloid radio and tabloid television, too, which follows from the success of the tabloid newspapers. They all want it short, incredibly superficial, and with each item full of either mockery, condemnation, instant judgments, the official line, and/or defense of the status quo. Oh yes, and if you can get lots of tits and bums in there at every opportunity, so much the better, because women are only here to lust after. Have I just described the content of a tabloid newspaper or the content of a conversation you will hear in almost any bar when ‘the lads’ get together? Both. And that’s the point.
Those thought patterns in the collective mind created the reality we call the media. Tabloid newspapers reflect, and program, the thoughts of great tracts of humanity in an ever-downward spiral. The more our thoughts are programmed, the more open we become to even more severe programming. The media won’t change until the collective mind changes and that will result only from changes in individual thinking. We create our own reality and the media is no different. Whatever dominates the thought patterns of the collective mind will be the physical reality.
The members of the human race in general want someone else to do their thinking for them, and they have allowed their minds to close to the point where they do not want to discuss anything that isn’t superficial or full of mockery and instant judgements of others. Hence the media we have today. We have thought that into existence, too. When we change, it will change.
This background bombardment of our subconscious with a common ‘party line’ of information plays a major part in the way the conscious and subconscious sees itself and the world. As a result, we are allowing the sum total of the media to program our thought patterns and create our reality. I learned so much about this process when I was the focus of unbelievable national ridicule in the early 1990s. Most of what the media said about me was 100% the opposite of what I was saying and writing, but the people overwhelmingly believed what the media told them and I was ridiculed by millions for things I wasn’t saying and didn’t believe. This is happening to other people every day.
The mass hypnosis has also turned millions into spectators of the world, rather than participants. We allow others to do, while we observe and sit in the stand, watching the few play the game which decides the future of the human race...our human race. This is symbolized by sport and the endless television soaps in which we are spectators of the manufactured lives of overwhelmingly cardboard, one-dimensional characters. We often live their lives instead of our own. I love sport and there are soaps that I enjoy, too, but the danger comes when that is all we have in our lives.
As one of the Illuminati Protocols said in the 1800s:
We think of hypnotism only in terms of a single person lying down on a couch and listening to the words of a hypnotist speaking softly into the ear. Or we may think of the stage hypnotist who has a group of people doing silly things in front of a guffawing audience. Some even demand that this should be banned because it is dangerous.
These are obvious forms of hypnosis. But we don’t realize that we are subtly being hypnotized and encouraged to do and think silly things every day of our lives. Instead of lying on the couch listening to the soft words of the hypnotist, we sit in the chair listening to newsreaders, film stars, advertising voice overs, and sundry presenters. The messages pound our conscious and subconscious mind and we are programmed to think the way the controllers who own the media, the banks, the drug companies, the armament companies, the oil companies, ad infinitum, want us to think. Is there anyone left reading this book who still believes that the idea of a global conspiracy with the tiny few controlling the vast majority is a fantasy, and impossible? Surely not.
Dr Key revealed the existence of the Tachistoscope, a film projector with a high speed shutter which flashes messages every five seconds for 1/3000th of a second. These messages could not be seen by the naked eye, but were absorbed by the subconscious. The message would then filter down from the subconscious to the conscious level as a thought, desire, or opinion, which the person believes is their own. Years ago, a flash-frame picture of a Coca-Cola bottle used to be inserted into a cinema film just before the interval. The audience couldn’t see it, but their subconscious could. Sales of Coca-Cola during cinema intervals went up significantly.
Thefts from the stores were reduced. In 1986, a more advanced security system emerged which broadcast its messages under piped music. A computer ensured that the sound of the message went up and down with the loudness of the music. These subliminal messages have been shown to work. So what else are they being used for? Some years ago there was a furore in France when the picture of Francois Mitterand was seen to flash into view on the opening titles to the news. This was when Mitterand was running for president. It was a mistake by the TV company, for sure. But what kind of mistake? An error in putting the flash picture in the titles at all, or a mistake in leaving it in for too long, so that the conscious and as well as the subconscious saw it?
The potential for subliminal messages to affect the outcome of elections and to direct the thinking of the mass population is simply fantastic. If they can make more people buy bottles of Coca-Cola with these techniques, why can’t they make more people vote for the party and the candidate they want? They can. Of course they can. And given what you have read up to now, do you think they would use that potential to manipulate the public mind or would they refuse to do that because it was undemocratic? Once the technology and the knowledge is available, there is nothing that can’t be communicated to the subconscious through this technique of mass hypnosis.
These subliminal messages are coming out of the television set without even the television station knowing it is happening. The messages can tell people how to vote, who they should love and who they should hate, what they should buy, and what they should think. Say you want to start a riot. Send out subliminal messages to the area for a while, and then produce one or two agents provocateur and an event to focus anger. In no time you will have the people, already primed subliminally, going absolutely crazy. Then you say you need more power for the police and the military to ‘solve’ this ‘problem’. The television has become the greatest tool of mind manipulation and it starts with children only a few years old.
Some researchers believe children are especially susceptible to this form of programming. Most people watch the television as if mesmerized by the screen. Conversation is destroyed. Instead of talking to people, we are talked at by the television set. Our lives are conditioned by the themes and indoctrination pouring from the screen. We are told what is right and wrong, good and bad, success and failure, in and out. It is our resident hypnotist in the corner of the room. Many people fall asleep in front of the television because their minds are bombarded to the point of overload by the incessant flow of opinions and information.
What does a hypnotist do before he or she begins b make those subconscious suggestions? They put their clients into a state of relaxation, a dozy half-sleep, because that is when the conscious mind is quiet and the subconscious can be most effectively accessed. What better way, therefore, to program television viewers with subliminal messages than to have them half asleep in the chair. In fact, people could even be put into that state by the subliminal messages coming from the set. And what is the real effect of the computer games and virtual reality technology that turns some children into zombies?
Virtual reality is a good name because the whole system is designed to encourage the human race to accept a virtual reality and call it life. Dr Wilson Bryan Key, the investigator of these matters, said that subliminal technology can so affect many people that they can be programmed to start eating and drinking too much, change their sexual habits, and embark on an almost endless list of other manifestations of extreme behaviour. The subconscious is programmed with thought patterns and it creates that physical reality. These techniques are becoming more sophisticated and developed all the time.
Susan Bryce highlighted one development in her article in Exposure magazine in the June/July 1993 issue:
The technology has been developed to send out messages as microwaves and extremely low frequency waves (ELFs) which can speak to the mass subconscious and cause physical illness. It is important to appreciate that the knowledge held secretly about the human mind and body is far more advanced than anything we are allowed to see in the public arena.
Again, it is part of the “need to know” policy. If someone has knowledge and technology which most people do not realize exists, the potential for manipulation is enormous. The esoteric knowledge passed through the secret society network across the years has been a major factor in the creation of this two-speed science. The public is told about a limited and intentionally flawed science which goes back to Darwin and others, while the far more advanced version remains hidden. The mind-spirit, the eternal part of us, is a series of interconnecting and interacting magnetic energy fields.
These react with other magnetic energy fields and this is why people who live under electricity power lines are more prone to certain illnesses. The electromagnetic field thrown out by the power lines imbalances the magnetic mind-spirit of the people living nearby. This imbalance is passed through the multiple levels of our being to the physical body where it manifests as cancer or some other dis-ease. It can also directly affect cellular functioning to create physical illness.
Therefore, if the manipulators can broadcast waves at certain frequencies, they can imbalance our cellular and non-physical magnetic levels and cause physical, mental, and emotional illness. Former FBI agent, Ted Gunderson, has said that magnetic radioactive discs have long been used covertly as cancer-inducing “silent killers” to remove unwanted politicians and others. These can cause cancers which grow at astonishing speeds. Experiments on the effects of ELF waves and chemical warfare substances are routinely carried out on unsuspecting populations around the world. We hear about these things on the news with reports of a “strange and unexplained plague/disease” which has broken out over a small area of a country. I am told that an area of New Mexico is plagued by a “hum” that no-one can explain, which causes headaches and illness in susceptible individuals.
Experiments have shown that if people are subjected to these waves for little more than a minute, they begin to react as the messages tell them to. In their minds, these messages appear to be their own thoughts, when in reality they are tuning into wavelengths broadcast from outside of their psyche. In such a situation, these people are fully-paid-up robots. Two such techniques are called Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control and Electronic Dissolution of Memory.
Researchers say that these can remotely induce an hypnotic trance, deliver suggestions, and erase all memory of both the instructions and whatever it is the person has done in response to those instructions. What a tool if you want to assassinate a ‘troublemaker’; create some terrible event to discredit a group or person; abduct someone and blame it on ‘aliens’; or produce a problem-reaction-solution situation.
In 1975, the journalist James Moore claimed to have secured a 350-page manual on the subject from CIA sources. Part of that document said:
It makes you wonder about some of the messages being received by mediums and channellers. Psychically sensitive people are consciously tuning into other wavelengths of reality. It is possible, indeed probable, that some are tuning into wavelengths broadcast from technology on this planet. In the world of secret science, they know it is possible for channellers to communicate with other wavelengths of reality. They know how it is done and they use mediums/channellers in their experiments.
According to the books on the mind control and advanced science establishment at Montauk13 in the USA in the 1970s, the Elite scientists were able to produce the image on a computer screen of what their psychic was thinking. They later broadcast his thought waves from a transmitter at the base and found that people in the area had been affected in their own minds by the thoughts being broadcast. The manipulators know also that more and more people are listening to what channellers say. What a great opportunity to use this process to further manipulate.
Once again, our protection is to think for ourselves and accept no information on face value without thinking hard about it and checking the facts as best you can. That includes what you read in this book.
MKUItra began in the 1950s under the Canada-based Scottish psychiatrist, Doctor Ewen Cameron, who became a close friend of CIA chief Allen Dulles after Cameron served as the Canadian/United States psychiatrist at the Nuremberg War Trials. Cameron was one of the psychiatrists who examined the man who claimed to be Rudolf Hess. That was an appropriate appointment because what Cameron did to his ‘patients’ under the CIA’s MKUItra programme mirrored some of what the Nazis did to their victims, too.
Under the supervision of people like the Dulles brothers and other members of the US Elite establishment, many of the Nazi mind control experts and leading scientists were secretly removed from Germany, as the Allies closed in. They were taken to the United States to continue their work into mind control and what we would call flying saucers, anti-gravity technology. Some estimate that as many as 10,000 active Nazis escaped, leaving the farce of the Nuremberg War Trials to deal out ‘justice’ to those who had often been guilty of far less terrible crimes than the ones the Americans had helped to escape. Yes, the Nazis carried out horrible experiments on people, including children. Of that I have no doubt. But does anyone really think that is not continuing in the underground establishments in America and elsewhere today?
The Nazi mentality did not end in 1945. It just changed locations and, literally, went underground. The CIA was formed out of the wartime OSS, the Office of Strategic Services. This formation of the new Central Intelligence Agency was done under the supervision of British Intelligence, which had centuries of accumulated experience in covert operations. Many of the key personnel in the CIA were Nazis who had served under Hitler.
One, Reinhard Gehlen of the SS, was employed by Allen Dulles to set up the CIA network in Europe after the war. I say ‘employed’. In fact Gehlen has said that it was more like a partnership between the CIA (headed by the Hitler supporting Allen Dulles) and the worldwide Nazi network. Gehlen said that the collaboration with Dulles was a “gentlemen’s agreement” which,
The ‘verbal agreement’ wouldn’t have anything to do with the danger of written evidence seeping out and blowing the story, I suppose. Writer and researcher, Noam Chomsky, says that Gehlen set up a secret US-Nazi army, which extended its operations to Latin America (where it supported the Nazi-type regimes imposed on the people by the United States). The CIA was formed by Nazis, for Nazis, to promote the Nazi mentality. British Intelligence was a major instigator because it too is a Nazi organization at its core, and so is the deeply corrupt international ‘police’ operation known as Interpol, which has been headed by known Nazis.
The CIA, under Allen Dulles, funded psychiatrist Ewen Cameron from the early 1950s, as documents released in 1977 under the US Freedom of Information Act have confirmed. Most of the documents were destroyed or not released, but there were enough to offer just a glimpse of the nightmare that was MKUltra. The project included the use of drugs (like LSD) and grotesque mind manipulation techniques known as ‘depatterning’ and ‘psychic driving’. The CIA admitted supporting research into human mind and behaviour control at 150 institutions and these included hospitals, prisons, drug companies, and 44 universities. At least 185 scientists were involved. Like the Nazis’ experiments, the targets were largely those considered lesser human beings’ such as prostitutes, foreigners, people with non-white skins, and drug addicts.
Thousands of prisoners were also forced to take part, and hospital and mental patients were used without their consent as experiment-fodder for these crazy people. Let no-one tell me this is not still happening today all over the world, including the UK. Soldiers in the US forces were used, too. Thousands were given LSD in the 1970s while being told they were testing gas masks and other protective gear. This puts in a new light the severe damage to the health of soldiers given vaccinations during the Gulf War, who are now demanding compensation.
The CIA funded Ewen Cameron through an organization called the Society for Human Ecology, yet another CIA front, which was connected to Cornell University in New York. Cameron and Dulles wanted to develop forms of drugs, electronic stimulation, and hypnosis which would remove a person’s natural personality and replace it with an ‘improved one’. Another major aim was to preprogram people to carry out assassinations which could then be written off as the work of some Tone nutter’. This goal was quite quickly achieved.
In 1969, the CIA psychologist, Jose Delgado, published his book, Physical Control Of The Mind: Toward A Psychocivilised Society. He wrote:
Speaking in 1966, Delgado said that his experiments,
Which is precisely what happened to the killers of people like John Lennon,17 the would-be assassin of President Reagan, and, almost certainly, the assassin of King Faisal of Saudi Arabia, who was shot dead in 1975.
The King, who routinely had free copies of the Protocols distributed to foreign tourists, was murdered by a relative who travelled from America to do it. This technique is also used to program people who run into streets or restaurants shooting in all directions, and to carry out the most awful crimes which add to the fear and the “something must be done” mentality. This demands - and gets - harsher laws and sentences, a more armed police force, and cameras in the streets. By the way, Lennon’s assassin, Mark Chapman, was “mentally assessed” by Bernard Diamond, the same psychiatrist who “assessed” Sirhan Sirhan, the patsy in the Bobby Kennedy murder. Just a coincidence! LSD was widely used in the Cameron experiments.
It creates confusion, a key aspect of mind control. One of the early victims was Frank Olsen, a chemist specializing in airborne disease. He was given LSD while suffering from “depression and paranoia” and two weeks later threw himself to his death from the window of a New York hotel. The CIA funded a series of ‘safe houses’ for experimentation in San Francisco and New York. Here MKUltra operatives observed through two-way mirrors how the clients of CIA-hired prostitutes responded after being secretly given LSD. At Ewen Cameron’s headquarters, the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal, Canada, he ‘treated’ unsuspecting people for a variety of mental problems and systematically dismantled their personalities in MKUltra experiments.
In the Observer magazine of October 16th 1994, writer Elizabeth Nickson told the stories of many of Cameron’s victims, including her own mother. One patient, a woman from Vancouver, was suffering from post-natal depression and fatigue. She was kept in a drug-induced sleep for 86 days by Cameron and when he was finished with her, she had lost all memory of her life, including the ability to read and write. She even needed toilet training. As a result of this pressure on her family, she lost her husband and six children.
This was the same Ewen Cameron who was feted by his fellow psychiatrists and made president of the string of leading psychiatric bodies, including the World Psychiatric Association. The president and directors of the MKUltra project included the president of the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Centre and the head of the Smithsonian Institute. This was the establishment top brass, not some mad professor working alone.
Psychic driving, the input of the ‘new’ personality, often followed electro-therapy, the destruction of the natural personality. This was called the “depatterning” process. Cameron used a technique called the Page-Russell shock treatment, named after the two British doctors who developed it. The victims would be given an initial electric shock, followed by five to nine smaller ones, two or three times a day for up to thirty days. Hospital workers at the time have reported that the screaming echoed around the hospital.
The ‘patients’ would try to escape from this horror. Once this depatterning was completed and the victim thoroughly confused, a helmet would be clamped on their heads and negative messages would be repeated into the victim’s mind for maybe twenty hours a day. These messages would repeat phrases like “My mother hates me, my husband hates me, I am a failure”, and so on, using recordings of the victim’s own voice. Cameron would also wire their legs and give them an electric shock after the completion of each message.
With the old personality now destroyed, the process would be used to build a new one in Cameron’s image. And this, lest we forget, was funded by the CIA with taxpayers’ money at the behest of Allen Dulles, the man who, with others, controlled the Nuremberg War Trials that sentenced scores of lower-ranked Nazis to death for doing far less than he and Cameron were doing. All of this continues in a much more advanced way today. I have been told of mind control research of a similar kind in some UK universities and if you know more, please tell me.
Most people have no idea how easy the law makes it for you to be imprisoned in a mental institution. It really is so easy. A friend of mine who was going through a traumatic spiritual awakening (he was seeing the world for what it really is) was pressured by his family to agree to attend a private mental hospital. He chose to go for their sake. But when he decided to leave the hospital after chatting with the doctors, he was forcibly stopped. He was also forced to take drugs. What the staff of that hospital were doing was perfectly legal.
Once you agree to have treatment at such a place, you lose all your rights to leave if the staff decide that you should not. As the doctors at that level of the profession largely have no idea about the nature of the psyche, despite being called ‘psychiatrists’, they can imprison you and force you to take drugs to ‘treat’ quite natural phenomena. If we are not vigilant, the excuse of ‘mental illness’ will be used to intern those who say they can communicate with other frequencies [’schizophrenia’] and those who claim there is a global conspiracy [’paranoia’]. Someone like me who talks about both becomes a ‘paranoid schizophrenic’, which is exactly how they imprisoned dissenters in the psychiatric hospitals of the Soviet Union.
This is not helped by the admission of Richard Helms, the CIA chief at the time of Watergate, that he destroyed most of the MKUltra documents in 1973. What we are looking at here is the sharp end of the policy to turn the human race from unique and free-thinking expressions of creation into a herd of sheep and robots. It is a combination of technology, engineered events, and control of both politics and (crucially) the media. Behind it is the familiar roll call. The document Silent Weapons For A Quiet War reveals the input of the Rockefeller Foundation in funding research through Harvard University into the potential for computers to control human thinking.
The aim is to have physical money replaced entirely by credit card electronic money, and then to replace credit cards and identity cards with a microchip just under the skin. Intel Corporation was awarded a five-year contract in 1994, to develop just such a device at its Rio Rancho, New Mexico, facility. This chip would be linked to a global computer using the excuse that all financial transactions had to be registered at the new world central bank. The computer would know everything there is to know about us at all times and would be able to send messages the other way, from the computer to us, feeding us messages and programming our consciousnesses. Robots would be exactly the word.
As Senator Sam J.Ervin, the head of a Senate subcommittee on behaviour modification, said in 1973:
Throughout the Silent Weapons document and the Elite philosophy in general, we see the desire to do exactly that. We see the theme of the chosen elite controlling the ‘stupid herd’ in all areas of our lives. It starts with the children in the schools and the young people in the universities. Get ‘em young and you have got them for good. I never cease to wonder when I speak at universities how the majority of students are already programmed to think like clones of the system by the age of seventeen and eighteen.
Their inability to think for themselves is quite stunning, with very honourable exceptions. Silent Weapons For A Quiet War emphasizes to its own agents the importance of controlling what children and young people are told. The teachers are trained to think in a certain way and to believe that the information they are communicating is true. Even if they doubt it, the authorities insist that it is taught anyway. “If you don’t like it Mr or Mrs Teacher, get out and we will replace you with someone who will do as they are told.”
As the rock group, Pink Floyd, say in their well-known song, children are programmed by the education system to be “Just another brick in the wall”. But how much debate goes on about these matters? Teachers, parents, the teaching unions, and the politicians go on endlessly about the funding of schools and the shortage of school books. Where is the concern about what is actually taught in the schools and what is written in those books? And yet there is no other subject on Earth that is more important than the programming of the human mind. From that all else comes.
The Silent Weapons document describes the mind-controlling technique brilliantly. It says of the Quiet War:
In others words, divide and rule, and introduce your global dictatorship via the stepping-stones approach and few will realize what is really going on until it is too late. In fact, many will even laugh at or condemn those who point out what is happening. Well the readers of this book, and many others like it, do know what is really going on. And if we are truly committed to a better world and to freedom of thought and expression, the information is impossible to ignore.
The work we all have to do to break the hold the programmers have on so many human minds is considerable, but it is perfectly achievable - and will be achieved - if we are prepared to get involved. There is nothing more powerful than a human mind determined to think and act for itself. Such a phenomenon is a manipulator’s nightmare and, like everyone on this planet, you have that power. You only have to use it.
|