18 - Bricks in the Wall

LET me offer you a definition of the word education as expressed in schools and universities across the world: To teach, instruct, and imbue with a doctrine, idea or opinion.

The Oxford English Dictionary would not agree because that it is the definition it gives for the word ‘indoctrinate’. But, to me, that is a perfect description of humanity’s version of education. Our children are not educated. They are indoctrinated - ‘imbued with a doctrine, idea, or opinion.

This is essential to the process of conditioning that we are subjected to throughout our lives. Education for the young is a wonderful concept if education is what it really is. But the system largely controls what children are taught, how they are taught, and what it wishes them to believe. What better way to condition your population than to have control of what young people are taught through their formative years? And from what we have seen of the system in all its glory, do you think this control is going to be used for the good of the children or the good of the system? Education, at least in its Western mode, is there to turn out system fodder.

It fills young and potentially creative minds with streams of boring, irrelevant and often inaccurate information; with complex mathematical equations most people will never use; and with a view of history that puts the State in the best possible light.

A Texan lady told me how she was taught history.

First, a long time was spent making the class feel good about being Texan. They were not only the best people in America, they were the best in the world. Once that was established, the genocide of the Indians by the white settlers was glossed over and rushed through in a ridiculously short time. You would have thought, she said, that only in the 20th century did American history really start.

What you would call ‘education’ is part of the Brotherhood war on the young:

“We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into the liberty of the person, but principally into education and training as being the corner-stones of a free existence. We have fooled, bemused, and corrupted the youth of the Goyim by rearing them in principals and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated.”

(Illuminati Protocol 10).

I have been saddened on my many visits to universities to see young people in their teens who do not have a thought in their head that someone else has not put there. They stand before you after only 17 or 18 years on the planet and are already mindlessly parroting the system’s propaganda. Another robot reporting for duty.

I was amazed to be told in all seriousness by a student at the prestigious Cambridge University that if you don’t eat meat you die! The fact that I was standing in front of her fit and well after many years as a vegetarian had no effect on her conviction that refusing to eat dead animals was the equivalent of suicide.

You can understand how indoctrination can take hold so quickly. The further you progress within the education system the more opportunity there is to control your thinking. Some of the most enlightened people I have met left school as early as they could and had not been to university. Enlightenment comes by expanding your consciousness and accessing higher levels of knowledge. Most conventional education closes minds and focuses them on this physical world alone. The campaigner, Michael Roll, makes this point in his booklet The Suppression of Knowledge.

He was referring here to those in high places within the system, but the principles apply to everyone and everything, be it religion, science, or economics:

“If a baby from birth is told by loving parents that 2 + 2 = 3; and later at Sunday school, kindergarten, preparatory school, public school, and university this young mind is again told by apparently clever and often highly respected teachers that 2 + 2 = 3; and if this same teaching comes through the mass media, backed by the weight of law, is it any wonder that many people, often in very responsible positions, seriously believe that 2 + 2 = 3 ?”

The system is geared to the setting and passing of examinations. This immediately creates ‘successes’ (those with the ability to absorb and remember mostly irrelevant and inaccurate information) and ‘failures’ (those who do not have that ability or are too bored to use it). The ‘successes’ go on to university to absorb yet more irrelevant and inaccurate information and the ‘failures’ go off to look for jobs that are more likely to be given to the ‘successes.’ What a way to start your life, be you a success or failure.

I was a failure under that definition. I was bored stiff at school. I could not see how most of the tidal wave of information I was being forced to listen to day after day could have any relevance to my future life. I also had the underlying feeling that most of what I was being told was baloney anyway. I was talked at by the teachers and rarely consulted for my view or asked to express creativity.

I never passed an exam and I left school at the first opportunity to become a professional soccer player. All my education in its true sense has happened since. I enjoyed school for the sport and my friends. I liked most of the teachers, too, because they were very nice people. But the lessons and examinations were something I had to endure in order to play soccer and be with my mates.

I can see why the system loves examinations. They are an excellent way of making children and young people absorb the system’s view. There is little margin for personal opinion. If you are going to pass you must tell the status quo what it wants to hear. Who sets the questions in exams? The status quo. Who decides what the answers must be if you are going to pass? The status quo.

Whatever is the conventional wisdom of the day provides the criteria under which you pass or fail. A few centuries ago you would have failed your exam if you had said the Earth was round!

Like all aspects of the system, education is in desperate trouble. Its role is to produce robots to fill the jobs the system requires them to do and to condition out of young people any idea of rebellion against the status quo. The system does not evolve to encompass the gifts and creativity of people; people have to be conditioned and prepared to fit the system. People blindly accept that while take-make-and-throw-away could employ the robots. Most accepted that you went to school to be prepared for work and then you worked in a trade until you retired or died.

But now that is no longer happening in the same way. Millions of young people can see no prospect of a job at the end of the line. Even the ‘successes’, the university graduates, are struggling to find employment. A feeling of ‘what’s the point?’ is growing. Truancy is mostly caused through boredom and a lack of self worth and involvement at school. Everyone, but everyone, has latent creativity and gifts they have come to offer the world. Human education is only seriously interested in the gifts that fit the system and that leaves out a terrific number of alienated people.

Within this perversion of the word education are a number of enlightened teachers and, to a lesser extent in my experience, university lecturers. They do the best they can to lessen the indoctrination. There are schools which try to tap the full potential of their students. But, like the doctors, nurses, politicians, journalists, economists and scientists who are opening their consciousness to greater understanding, teachers and lecturers are subject to severe limitations of action by the structure and control they have to endure.

As the demise of take-make-and-throwaway quickens we are hearing government ministers talking of a ‘return to basics’ in all things. This is their way of finding some illusion of security in a mythical 1950s utopia in which everyone had their place and everyone knew what it was. This back to basics policy when applied to education, puts an emphasis on ‘talking at’ teaching, an expansion of tests and exams and, to quote one Education Secretary, a return to teaching a fear of God. Give me strength.

I see a very different approach surfacing as consciousness expands its understanding of life. Like everything I have discussed in this book, the transition period for education will be one of opposites. The status quo and those who support it will try to hold back change by returning to ‘basics’ as they call them. They will wish to make education even more rigid and impose more dogma as a reaction to changes that will eventually sweep it away. Against that will be a growing demand from awakening people for education to replace indoctrination.

There are things we all need to learn in our early years, like how to count, write, and communicate. We also require a summary of the ideas that claim to explain what is happening around us. But, like history, these need to be presented as ideas, opinions and views, not facts, unless they can she shown to be so.

You only have to read government papers which are released thirty years after events to see how the state re-writes history every day - look at the information in this book! Secret Illuminati documents which have come to light say that they have rewritten some history, perhaps to suit its own ends.

To present all but the outlines of history as fact is to mislead. Children in the United States were brought up to believe the Indians were backward savages. When those children grew up, many treated the Indians appallingly from that indoctrinated perspective.

British children are taught by law in the schools that the Christian story is historical fact, not a story that Christians choose to believe. I was never told at school about Constantine’s Council of Nicaea, the Jesus-style savior figures of the pre-Christians, or the ‘crusade’ against the Cathars. Nor are my children.

Every Christmas, pupils in primary schools perform nativity plays. That’s fine if the story of the Nativity is portrayed as art, the acting-out of a Christian belief. But it isn’t. It’s mostly presented to the children as history.

I am looking forward to an education which teaches written and verbal communication, the mathematics we will need in our everyday lives, and the information that will help young people to have a wide understanding of the world. They need to be given access to all views and to be encouraged to have their own opinions.

In the teaching of religion, for example, the course would include explanations of what all religions believe and why. There would be no imposition of one Christian, Muslim, or Jewish dogma.

Explanations of karma, reincarnation, and Earth energies would be added to the curriculum along with the principles of astrology and alternative forms of healing to allow children and students the opportunity to have access to all views, not only those which the status quo wants us to believe.

Education of the future will encourage self-reliance. The basic skills people need to live without dependence on the system will be at the heart of this. How to grow food, cook, build a house, repair and maintain a home and its contents and the other skills necessary to be independent. This gives young people choices throughout their lives.

The education system of today is teaching more and more about less and less. It is producing people who are dependent on earning money from one specialized skill to pay for all the other things they need. This is the opposite of independence. And look at the consequences when that skill is no longer required by take-make-and- throwaway. But making people dependent serves the system magnificently.

The main motivation of the new education will be to identify and encourage the gifts the student has brought into incarnation. The students themselves will decide this. Ask young people what they most enjoy and you will invariably be looking at their natural potential. We reveal our gifts in our enthusiasms and interests. Many young people who are less than ‘successful’ at school will be doing some marvelous things in their spare time when they are in control of what they can and cannot do.

I have known people who were regarded as failures at maths at school but who can work out the odds and pay-outs for a horse race at lightning speed. This is possible because the maths involved - in this case when applied to horse racing - has become part of their enthusiasm. You may not agree with horse racing or betting, but that’s another subject. The point I am making is that, if you encourage people’s enthusiasms and use those as a basis for teaching other skills, you are going to be very much more successful than if you only talk at them from the front of the class or tell them to read text books.

The new education will not concentrate on the skills demanded by throughput. There will be greater opportunities to develop gifts in the arts, crafts and sport. With everyone’s gifts encouraged, there will be no ‘failures’. Youngsters will not be leaving school thinking they have failed because the examination results say so.

Once the base and diversity of knowledge has been taught, the opportunities will be there to specialize and develop to a level of excellence whatever the student has decided he or she wishes to do. But this will happen with the wide range of skills and understanding underpinning that specialization and the choices they offer, always available.

Respect and love for the Earth and all life will be encouraged throughout the new education. From an early age, children will spend time, as part of their curriculum, working in the community with old people, the infirm and those in need for whatever reason. Loving and caring for each other will be the guiding principles of education.

Professional teachers won’t be the only vehicles for educating the young. In every community there are thousands of people with skills and knowledge which would benefit students. But, instead of using that wealth of knowledge, the system relies on teachers and lecturers alone to give insights into subjects for which they often have no practical experience. There needs to be a better balance between the teachers’ classroom skills and the practical experience of others in the community.

It is time for the teaching profession to rebel and refuse to serve this system of indoctrination any longer. They are just being used by those in control to feed the children in their care the information the system wants them to hear and believe. Come on teachers and teachers’ unions.

Refuse to be used as system fodder programmed to turn out more fodder to replace you. Stop cooperating, Say No. The same applies to parents. Insist on real education. Stop cooperating with the programming of your children. The circle must be broken.

During the transition period, I expect more people to take their children out of the state system. They will either teach them at home or get together in groups to form their own schools. These will not be giant comprehensives. They will be much smaller and more personal. A typical one could be composed of just a few families getting together.

Far less of a student’s day will be spent sitting and being talked at; far more in doing and talking themselves. The move away from formal state education will increase through this decade and across the millennium. Economic collapse will add further to the demise of the present education system. Further in the future, the whole concept of education will be unrecognizable when compared to what we have today or even to the new approach to learning which I have been promoting.

We need to appreciate that going through the state education indoctrination machine and coming out with examination passes and letters after your name does not, in itself, make you intelligent, wise or inspired. It can actually suppress all three. While I was writing this chapter I saw a ‘highly-qualified’ scientist giving a television lecture about the new frontiers of science.

At the end he posed a number of questions which he said science will need to answer about the mysteries of life. People without his paper qualifications have been answering those questions since before he was born, but the system has not listened. In the next twenty years, it will be shown, even to the satisfaction of mainstream thinking, that the themes in this book and others about life and Creation are correct.

The media could have printed these answers years ago, but they ignored them because I and people like me do not have letters after our name or have our explanations pored over in scientific journals. Nor are we supporters of the status quo. The education system of today doesn’t just indoctrinate the population during their time at school and university. It decides throughout our lives who we should listen to and who we should not, especially when science is involved.

Yet, if you can access higher levels of consciousness, you can bring into this world understandings and knowledge that are light years ahead of human science, the bulk of which is only interested in the physical world. Coming into incarnation now through many of our babies are aspects of universal consciousness of considerable evolution.

With the frequencies rising, they are able to tune consciously much earlier in their lives to frequency levels that were denied to us. We have had to work to stay with the rising frequencies while babies today can come in at the highest levels available to this planet.

They will be manifesting their higher knowledge and understanding of who they are and what they are doing here much earlier than we could. This doesn’t mean they are necessarily more evolved than many others on Earth today. It means they can connect earlier in their lives with the higher frequencies the planet is moving into. I have heard many people say that babies today are different. Well this is why.

This phenomenon alone will ensure that education will become a two-way process, as it should always have been anyway. We will tell the children what we know, or think we know, and they will tell us what they know. Encouraging them to connect with their highest potential will be the most important gift we can give to them and the world. The education of the future will be designed to bring out all the skills and knowledge that we possess and to help to lead us along the life path we have chosen before incarnation.

Today we indoctrinate for the system. Tomorrow we will educate for life.
 

Back to Contents

19 - Exploitation of the Spirit

THEY’RE after your mind. If they can control the way you think and feel they can control your behavior and hijack your individuality. They can take you over.

‘They’ can take many forms:

• entities on other frequencies

• religions

• elements of the New Age

• technology of mind-control under the guidance of those groups outside of governmental and democratic control who seek to rule the world

In this chapter I am looking at some of the ways ‘they’ exploit the spirit and the minds of the human race, how we can stop it happening and how ‘they’ are likely to react to the challenge of the changing consciousness that threatens their ambitions so fundamentally.

It is important to know what is going on because the mind controllers in all their forms will be trying even harder today to prevent the sort of changes I have outlined in the second half of the book.

Religions like Christianity, Islam, Judaism and so many others have only survived this long by fear, indoctrination and imposition. Without these, they would have been long gone. In their extreme forms they amount to nothing less than spiritual fascism.  

Their fear, guilt and prejudice have been indoctrinated through the generations over thousands of years and they have made a fundamental contribution to the division and pain on the Earth today. How ironic that those who proclaim the Jewish religion and condemn Islam could well have experienced Islamic lives in the past and vice-versa. It’s the same with Protestants and Catholics, those two expressions of the Christian creed which have often been in conflict. Whenever I see Ian Paisley, the vehement Protestant spokesman in Northern Ireland, a voice in my mind says, ‘He was a pope!’.

While the major religions speak of a world of spirit, they have been created by and motivated by the misunderstandings in the world of matter under the guidance of highly negative and imbalanced aspects of the Luciferic consciousness working on the minds of those involved - not all of them, but enough.

The religions have sought material and political power and that has been their driving force.

They have wished to control and deny free expression. The Inquisitions, the torture and the mass murder of non-believers are evidence of that. Any creed which has to indoctrinate, frighten and impose itself through violence and genocide has no respect for human life and freedom of thought and expression, nor for the very values it is supposed to proclaim. If they are so confident that what they say is true and credible, why do they feel the need to impose it and suppress alternative explanations? The answer to that is that, without imposition, it would not be here today.

We now have endless factions of Christianity, Mormons, Methodists, Baptists and more far right mind-controlling sects springing up to take advantage of humanity’s spiritual emptiness and lack of meaning, particularly among the young. ‘Give us your money, do as we say and we’ll give you all the answers because we are the representatives of God.

If you don’t do what we say, you will be rejected by Jesus and go into the fires of hell.’ That sums up the basic message of so many sick and misguided groups which prey on the minds of those seeking meaning in this crazy world. Exploitation of the spirit is a growth industry.

For nearly two thousand years Christianity had a free hand to force its creed upon the population of; particularly, the Western world. British people were forced to go to church by law and even today Christianity is given free air time quite outrageously day after day by the BBC and others to broadcast its propaganda. The Christian view is taught, again by law, in the schools. The Church of England is part of the institution of State. Prime Ministers are involved in the selection of bishops and the monarch is crowned as ‘Defender of the Faith’.

Most people have forgotten that the church became part of the state in the first place only because Henry VIII wanted a divorce and the Pope refused to allow it. As we have seen, Henry’s decision to ignore the Pope and the determination of his daughter, Elizabeth I, to become supreme head of a Protestant Church of England led to Church and State becoming linked at all levels.

To this day, bishops are given automatic places in the House of Lords and most of the clergy are often reluctant or frightened to speak out strongly against governments who abuse the values for which the Church claims to stand. There are exceptions to this, but the general rule remains.

Christianity and other religions have instigated, supported or watched without challenge, some of the most horrendous atrocities against humanity and the Earth. Roman Catholicism, that most arrogant of dictatorships controlled by the Brotherhood and the notorious P2 Lodge of Freemasons. still tries to force people to behave in ways it deems acceptable.

Yet, despite all its imposition, privileges and advantages, the Christian Church is crumbling before our eyes. Attendances continue to fall and churches to close because the money is no longer there to pay the bills. The Church of England has been financed mostly from its land holdings and inherited wealth.

The largest part of this land, and therefore the Church’s wealth, came into its possession through force of various kinds, violent or psychological. In some cases, landowners who went off to fight for God (Christian power and influence) in the Crusades were persuaded by the Church to sign over all their land and property in the event of their death. Giving all that to the Church would ensure a place in Heaven. Purely by coincidence it would also ensure that the Church became richer.

They could always come up with a biblical passage to support them:

“And everyone that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father or mother, or wife or children, or lands for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.”

But falling attendances and ill-fated property speculation from the late 1980s have dramatically reduced the wealth of the Church of England, and others are also, or will soon be, in similar trouble. Around three-quarters of a billion pounds have been wiped off the Church of England’s assets and that is only what they have publicly admitted to. Parish churches have been told they will now have to raise more of their money for themselves because the central fund cannot afford to continue with donations at the level they have been in the past. Even the ability of the Church to pay pensions to its clergy has been questioned.

Alongside this blow to its finances has come the public questioning of its dogma. I have said before that part of the plan for the transformation has been for some of the volunteers to incarnate with the task of becoming part of the bastions of mind-control, like the Church, the media, the monarchy, and science.

They would not remember this yet but they are being activated at the right time to undermine these organizations from within. A wonderful example of this, I believe, is the former Bishop of Durham, David Jenkins. He has attracted fierce criticism from fanatics for questioning the Christian version of the Virgin Birth, much of the Christmas story, the Second Coming and the existence of a place called Hell to which sinners are supposed to be condemned for all eternity.

Like most people who stand up and speak out with courage he was only articulating what others believe but are too frightened say. It speaks much for the feeble foundations of Christianity that those who attack the Bishop say he is questioning the whole basis on which the Christian religion stands or falls.

If a creed depends on events that supposedly happened two thousand years ago, as reported in a book written by who knows who and who knows when, in who knows what circumstances, it doesn’t say much for the creed, does it? But the Bishop has had the courage to keep on speaking out and, slowly, others within the Protestant and Catholic churches are beginning to do the same.

The realization is beginning to dawn that ancient texts have to be read symbolically, not literally, most of the time, and that you cannot use them as an infallible record of truth. Such people have a long way to move before they encompass the sort of themes included in this book but they are already questioning the dogmatic view of the Church. We will see more people breaking ranks and saying what they have long believed - that the dogma of the Christian creed is simply not credible.

You only have to read some Christian literature to realize that:

“If you ignore him (Jesus) and reject him now, at the Day Of Judgment when we must all stand before him he will ignore and reject you. ‘I do not know you, depart from me’.” (This is the ‘loving’ Jesus and the Prince of Peace? )

“...after death there is no more opportunity to turn to Christ. It will be too late.” (This is clearly bad news for the babies who die after a few minutes or the little children who have not had the opportunity to know what Jesus is demanding of them. And what about the children in parts of the world who do not even know of Jesus?)

“The good news of the Gospel is that Jesus, the perfect substitute, made the ultimate once and for all payment on our behalf It cost Him His lift. As a result God gives the free gift of salvation to those who believe in His Son.”

(The publication from which this quote is taken included a chapter attacking alternative thought called ‘The Fine Art Of Baloney Detection’! ).

Throughout the Christian Church there are many thousands of people, like the Quakers, who have been attracted by the laudable values attributed to Jesus in the Gospels. They have suffered the dogma but lived the values. They have used the Church to work for the good of the community. Indeed, there are some magnificent human beings working within Christianity and other religions.

These are people who would have found other ways to express their decency if the Church had never existed. They are prisoners of the dogma within the Church structure but not within their own consciousness. When that structure is no more, and that time is not far away, these Church people will be freed to live and promote the values of caring, sharing, love and tolerance without being forced to insist that everything in the Bible is true and the word of God.

Such values have been devalued by the dogma which anyone with a mind they can genuinely call their own knows to be invention and not even inspired invention at that.

The rising frequencies will be affecting open minded, valueed, Church people in the same way that they are awakening others. As we have seen with the Bishop of Durham, the awakening to their role in this life will be so powerful that they will not be able to stop themselves from speaking out, no matter what the short-term consequences for them might be. Tensions will grow between this awakening consciousness within the Church and the closed minds who will seek security in the face of these changes by the promotion of dogma in its most extreme forms.

The demise of the economic system will bring the political right to the surface and the religious right will rise in the wake of the Church’s collapse. Both will fail as the transition proceeds, but they could cause considerable pain and disruption in the short term. There are likely to be witch-hunts by the extremists against those within the religions who disagree with them.

I see in all the religions the rejection of dogma by sensible, open-minded Muslims, Jews, Christians and others in the light of the changing consciousness. They will start to think for themselves and demand freedom of thought and expression. Summon your courage, thinkers within the Church, and speak out.

The religious robots also need to rebel. The extremes will react against this challenge, creating potential for conflict. Mind-controlled fanatics who will be befuddled even more by the rising vibrations could resort to violence and inquisition in an attempt to impose their will. There will be attempts to portray the upheavals of the transition, including the weather and geological events, as God’s reprisals against a human race which does not behave as he says, (i.e. what the religious dogmatists say).

This will succeed with a few people and there will be a temporary turning to these religions by those who fear what is happening but don’t wish to take responsibility for their own thoughts and actions. I believe that the Brotherhood and the scientists of the underground bases, may use their Walt Disney technology to project illusions of great religious miracles to suggest that the Second Coming is upon us and that people must repent (for repent, read ‘do as they say’).

The Brotherhood will be at the same time be using the Church and destroying it when the moment arrives to introduce its own “Messiah” or “World king”, whatever form that is supposed to take. Having manipulated the Vatican for its own ends, it will bring down the Roman Catholic Church.

It is vital that people do not buy their ludicious, but sinister, alternative:

“We shall not overtly lay a finger on existing churches, but we shall fight against them by criticism calculated to produce schism... only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of the Christian religion. As for the other religions, we will have still less difficulty in dealing with them.”

(Illuminati Protocol 17).

Religion is under challenge on two fronts, the Brotherhood and the changing consciousness, and the way we react to its devise is going to decide which one will hold sway in the collective human mind.

The greatest potential for trouble is from those countries where religious fascist regimes are already in control. To the people of such countries I would offer again these words: ‘100,000 Englishmen cannot control 300 million Indians if those Indians will not cooperate’.

Sadly, after a lifetime, often many lifetimes, of severe indoctrination, many of those in countries controlled by the religious right have layers of conditioning to remove before they will challenge that control in large enough numbers. As always in looking ahead, exactly what will happen is impossible to say because that will depend on how many open up to the new frequencies and how humanity as a whole reacts to events.

Christianity is already well aware of the consequences for its influence and existence being posed by the new consciousness. Its reaction to this has been painfully predictable. It is turning to the weapons it always uses in times of trouble - fear and misrepresentation. Nothing encapsulates this approach and what we are likely to see from the dogma-supporters in the near future better than a book called New Age versus the Gospel: Christianity’s Greatest Challenge.

It was put through my letter box by a local Christian offering to ‘save’ me from my misguided ways. He did this with the best of intentions I am sure but all the book achieved was to confirm to me (a) the pathetic nature of dogmatic Christianity and (b) the way in which that dogma reacts to alternative thought.

This is some of the blurb on the book cover:

“Suddenly it is chic to be ‘spiritual’.” (Implication: you can only be spiritual if you are a Christian).

“But the roots of today’s ‘Spirituality’ are in Paganism, and not Christianity.” (A breathtaking statement when Christianity is recycled Paganism!)

“...(The New Age).. a heady mix of Hinduism, Buddhism, and the hard core occult represents the greatest threat to Christianity in the history of the faith.” (The term ‘hard core occult’ is designed to frighten people. Occult is another word, like Paganism, that Christianity has assassinated. Originally it meant ‘hidden’. To investigate occult mysteries is to say you are investigating hidden mysteries. The word occult has been changed to imply devil worship. No single body has promoted the cause of extreme negativity more than Christianity through the centuries, except the Brotherhood. And the greatest threat to Christianity is, and has always been, itself.)

“Christians need to know where New Age is coming from and how to counter its claims.” (misrepresent them.)

“New Age Versus the Gospel analyses the menace, comes to grips with the Gospel and points to the Powerfor revival.” (The rise of evangelical dogmatists to condemn awakening peoples as evil followers of the Devil and to condemn other members of their own creed who disagree with them as not real Christians).

I have already been rebuked ‘in the name of the Lord’ by Christian evangelists and been dubbed ‘the anti-Christ’ and it was no surprise that a whole chapter was devoted to me in that book. I had to read the account about me a couple of times to confirm I wasn’t dreaming. It was hysterical.

The writer said that I had claimed on a television programme to be a ‘New Age priest’. I am more likely to call myself Nellie The Elephant than that. As you will see, I have great reservations about some areas of what is termed New Age, although not for the reasons expressed in that book. What is more, the whole idea of priests is abhorrent to me.

Stand by for more of such insults to the intelligence as the Christian dogmatists cling on to their sinking ship and thrash out at all who are heading for the lifeboats.

The foreword to the book was written by a cleric from All Souls Church, Langham Place, London. This is opposite the headquarters of BBC Radio and it is from All Souls that much free Christian propaganda is broadcast to the nation by the ‘independent’ BBC.

The author of the foreword has a real problem with the idea that all is One and all is God. Christianity is obsessed with portraying God as an outside force which is not part of us. Humans cannot find answers from within, the book informs us, we have to be ‘rescued’ and that can only happen if we ‘find’ Jesus. Only by accepting that Jesus had to suffer horribly on the cross, in order for his father to agree to forgive the sins of the rest of us, can we be ‘saved’, apparently.

He says that,

"from beginning to end, the New Age Movement expresses a preoccupation, even an infatuation, with self. It puts self in the place of God and even declares that we ARE God.”

Dogmatic Christianity is based on division and lack of self-worth a division between different parts of Creation and the belief that we are born sinners. Love of self is seen as arrogant, selfish and offensive to God. In fact, it is the lack of self love and, through that, love for others which is at the heart of humanity’s malaise. We cannot love, forgive and respect others until we can love, forgive and respect ourselves.

This link between love for self and love for others is highlighted in my book Heal The World. People who are aggressive in their behavior towards others are people who hate themselves. Their hatred of self is projected outwards in an apparent hatred of the world. Yet, I was banned from speaking at the Central Hall in Westminster, London, because I am saying love yourself; love the world.

I had wanted to hire the hall for a talk. I rang them and learned that the date I wanted was available. All was going well. Then, after the details had been agreed, the lady asked for my name. When I told her, there was a silence. After a few seconds she recovered her voice but her attitude had changed. The hall was run by the Methodist Church, she told me. I would have to write in and outline what I would be saying before permission to hire the hall would be granted.

So much for freedom of speech, I thought. I wrote to them but they asked for more details. I wrote again to inform them that, in part, I would be saying that we need to love, forgive and respect ourselves if we are do the same for others. I was not surprised that the Methodist trustees of the Central Hall replied that I would not be allowed to speak there. But I was rather taken aback by the reason they gave for this ban.

Part of their letter said:

“....The doctrines of the evangelical faith which Methodism has held from the beginning and still holds, are based upon the Divine revelation recorded in the Holy Scriptures. The Methodist Church acknowledges this revelation as the supreme rule of faith and practice..”

In other words, I take it, they believe that the Bible, despite all its contradictions, incitements to violence, and (according to research in the 19th Century) 36,191 translation errors in the King James version alone, is one hundred per cent accurate and infallible.

The letter continued:

“Central to the evangelical Christian doctrine is the belief that to love God is the first commandment, and that implicit trust in Him is the path to salvation. It is our feeling that the promotion of a world-view which is based on ‘self-love’ would be contrary to the Christian Gospel which Methodism seeks to expound.”

What have we come to? Someone is barred from speaking because a view which involves loving, respecting and forgiving yourself and others is ‘contrary to the Christian Gospel...’. Well, if that is the case, there is something seriously wrong with the Gospels or the interpretation of them. No wonder the Church is dying on its feet when people hear this proclaimed from the pulpits; nor is it surprising that Christianity has sought and fought to crush other views that threaten to expose its gigantic confidence trick on the minds of humanity.

In the face of the new consciousness, this centuries-old prison of the mind has no chance of surviving, no matter how it presents the beliefs of those who are putting a different view. In his criticism of the New Age, the cleric from All Souls gives us an excellent insight into the misunderstandings and desperation of Christianity.

He says in his introduction:

“To New Agers ‘transformation’ has nothing to do with people’s morality or behavior. It refers rather to the transformation of their consciousness, the discovery and development of their own potential.”

He says that as a criticism? And what will a transformation of consciousness do if not change the way people think and behave?

Christianity lives in a dream world in which one generation indoctrinates the next. It speaks of Divine Will and revelation when, in reality, its dogma was decided by a Roman Emperor, sundry bishops and misguided popes who sought economic and political power above spiritual insight. Its beliefs and ceremonies have their origin in the Pagan beliefs they so despise. Nothing will be affected more by the transformation, all over the planet, than Christianity and its like.

Open-minded true scientists are going to be inspired to confirm that all consciousness is eternal, that Creation is made up of frequencies and that everything is the same energy in different states of being. All is One. This and other discoveries and exposures will hasten the end of Christianity.

We will see real science (not the system-serving variety) and spirituality (not religion) speaking the same language. In fact, they already are.

The new spirituality will have no rules and regulations. It will respect the right of all to believe what they think is correct. Its only challenge will be to those who wish to force others, through subtle and less subtle means, to believe what they want them to believe.

My problem with Christianity and other dogmatic religions is not with their right to believe what they wish, but with the way they have tried to impose their beliefs through fear, violence and support from the State. Had that not been the case, this chapter would not have needed to be written, for the Christian religion would no longer be with us.

During the transformation, people will be guided together, naturally, as higher selves reconnect powerfully with our physical personalities. It will be a free spirituality in which we can link with the Source and the higher levels when we are alone at home, with a few friends, or in vast groups.

The choice will be ours and one will be no more valid than the other. With so many churches built on energy points, I believe many could be used by spiritual groups as Christianity continues to fold and the churches close. They could be used for energy-channeling and healing, rather than for the obsession with events which took place two thousand years ago. They will be places of love and joy where the gift of life can be celebrated with others.

They will not be places of fear and guilt which emphasize ‘sin’ at the expense of people loving themselves. With science and spirituality working as one, we will be visiting and interacting with other loving civilizations in the Universe and moving across frequencies. This will give a fantastic understanding of life and Creation compared with what we have now. Our spirituality will evolve rapidly as a result, if we are open to it.

There are dangers on this road, however, even for those who accept the themes of this book. You can believe in reincarnation without serving others. You can speak of peace and love without really meaning it at the core of your being. It is easy for love and peace to become the spiritual equivalent of ‘have a nice day’.

All that glitters is not gold and all that speaks of love and peace is not loving and peaceful. I have had several experiences, some very extreme, which have shown me this. So much of what is termed ‘New Age’ is merely the Old Age in disguise. It is, too often, the old thought patterns and reactions at work under a different cloak, that’s all.

The New Age is a vast tapestry of people and beliefs and should not be seen as a movement or entity which thinks and believes the same. I refuse to call myself ‘New Age’ because, like tens of millions of others, I am an aspect of consciousness awakening to my true self and that does not require titles or all-encompassing ‘movements’. It requires me to follow my own intuition at all times.

Within the New Age field, there is substantial exploitation and there are many who complicate simple themes. The more complicated you can make it appear, the more people will be dependent on others to decide what is best and to sell them endless paraphernalia - rebirthing tanks, counseling, karma sessions and goodness knows what else.

The idea is to free people from spiritual dependency and dependency of all kinds - not to create a new dependency on a guru, teacher, channeler or piece of equipment. That is not to say that some of these New Age services are not helpful when enlightened people are involved, they certainly are.

But too much is irrelevant and emotionally-dangerous exploitation. It can hold back your awakening and, in areas like karmic counseling, can, possibly, make you feel really bad about yourself if the counselor tells you of unpleasant things he or she claims you were responsible for in past lives. It is the same with many channelers. Much channeled information is claptrap and needs to be treated with great caution.

There is a woman I met briefly with Yeva who now sends me a stream of strange letters claiming the most outrageous things. She is quite obviously in a state of considerable confusion and in need of some enlightened help yet, on her business cards, she describes herself as a past life and present life counselor. Be careful.

The Brotherhood have infiltrated New Age and UFO groups and negative extra-terrestrials could have been using channelers for thousands of years. Remember, they know this consciousness shift is planned and they want to stop it because they know the consequences of it for them. What better way than to feed a load of trash through channelers and ‘gurus’ to those who are being affected by that shift?

I read in one American New Age magazine some channeling, purporting to come from extra-terrestrials, that was calling for a world government. I have reservations, too, about some of the communications which allegedly come from ‘Ascended Masters’. Whenever I hear that term, I feel really bad about it. I have had bad vibes about some of the groups who have promoted this idea of ‘Masters’, not least the ‘I am’ cult in the United States.

The Masters, according to New Age belief; are part of something called the Great White Brotherhood who are said to be guiding humanity and the Earth through this time of change. But are they? Someone is, for sure, but can it be the entities who are said to be Masters? I’m not yet convinced, you know.

It could be that it is the hierarchal tone of Ascended Masters that makes me feel less than positive about it and maybe the blind worship of these entities is not something they wish to happen. But, even if the ideas of Masters is correct, is every channeled entity who claims to be from that consciousness stream really telling the truth?

The answer to the latter is definitely No, because negative ETs and the Luciferic consciousness use some channelers tuning to the lower frequencies as a means to manipulate.

Claiming to be from what is so widely accepted to be a positive consciousness stream like the Masters in an excellent way of doing it. I have no doubt that consciousness of a very high evolution is trying to guide us, and so are streams of positive, loving ETs from other Universal civilizations, but we always have to be selective and wary about who is on the other end of the line. Being spiritual is vital to the transformation but being streetwise is equally so.

Once again, the key is to follow our intuition, to listen to channeling while being very selective. It is what we feel is right within our hearts that matters and that doesn’t need the name of some Master of other to give it legitimacy. It has no name. It just is.

A danger I see is that parts of the New Age could become nothing more than another religion. The signs are already there. We have the gurus, the teachers, and the ‘living gods on Earth’.

We see ‘disciples’ giving over their responsibility to think and act to these people in the same way that Christians do to the Bible and Jesus, and Muslims do to the Koran and Mohammed. I have met people who have been diverted from the journey to enlightenment by becoming obsessed with Indian gurus. I have seen how they have turned their homes into shrines to them. I am not saying that we should not listen to the views of the guru figures, but no more so than anyone else.

What I challenge is the unquestioning worship of them. This is another expression of humanity’s collective desire to pass on their responsibility to others for the way they think and act. This is precisely what the Brotherhood wants. All over the New Age arena are cozy little niches where people can become trapped and cease to evolve their understanding.

Some have a certain belief about karma and they stick with it, no matter what other information comes to light; some channel the same non-physical entities all their lives instead of expanding their consciousness to access higher and higher levels of information and knowledge; others mix only with those who agree with them and avoid the sometimes-unpleasant and painful necessity of taking their knowledge to skeptical audiences who have as much right to hear it as everyone else.

I understand why some people find a nice little spot on the path and pitch their tent. There have been many times in the past when I have wished to step off the road and take a rest for a while from the frustration and aggravation of speaking to closed minds.

But, if we are to speed the emergence of the new consciousness and free humanity from the prison of indoctrination as smoothly as possible, we must continually work to expand our own understanding and to pass on what we believe for others to accept or reject. No-one said it would be easy and turning the New Age into another religion or giving our responsibility to guru figures will hold back the spiritual revolution.

Respect and love are the foundations of the new thinking -the worship of others is not, I would suggest. That’s the old way recycled.

But the positive contribution of what is termed the New Age movement and which I term the Spiritual Renaissance far outweighs the negative. I have met thousands of wonderful, loving, non-judgmental human beings who are doing a superb job in helping people to awaken. No-one wants to stop the exploitation of the new consciousness more than they do and, whenever I talk in these terms at meetings, the audience invariably shows its enthusiastic support for this view.

What I am saying is, be careful.

Just because someone claims to be a channeler, astrologer, karmic counselor or healer does not mean that they are proficient in those skills. Not even the well-known ones, necessarily. Look for those who are recommended and respected by others in their field or by previous clients. More than anything, our own intuition should be our guide.

I believe we could see three clearly identifiable groups during the transition. There will be those who reject the rising frequencies and who, as the years pass, will be easy to recognize. There will be those who move so far and stop when they find a comfortable niche. And there will be others, the few probably, who go on searching, seeking and challenging, no matter what the personal consequences in the short term.

The further you walk along the road the lonelier it can become, as others stop through weariness, material gain or fear. With every step, you are tuning to a higher wavelength which evolves your understanding and behavior. From the perspective of those who have chosen to stop back down the road you may appear extreme and strange. If you keep walking and seeking, you will be ridiculed and increasingly condemned by the first group of padlocked minds.

But I feel the second group, many of which will be within what is termed the New Age Movement, will also be less than supportive of those on the front of the snow plough who will be questioning many of the themes on which some New Age niches depend. The road to enlightenment is never-ending. Just as we are leaving dogmatic religion behind, so we will eventually do the same with many elements of current New Age dogma.

The third example of the exploitation of the spirit and the mind is the Brotherhood with the behavior-controlling technology I talked about in an earlier chapter. We are getting help with this from the higher levels who are taking steps to block it as the transformation proceeds. The more who ask for this to be done, the better. Mass forms of mind control can only affect us if we allow ourselves to delink from the frequency of love to which our heart chakras are tuned. If we think love and live love we can resist it.

Another crucial way our minds are attacked is the programming by the messages which are projected at us through the media and our general lives every day. We should not underestimate their power to exploit our minds and spirits. An Illuminati document called “Silent Weapons of Quiet Wars” was published in Beyond A Pale Horse. The document was found in 1986 in an IBM copier bought at a second hand sale. It was dated 1979.

It encapsulates all that I have been saying in this book:

“Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and gaining control of the public is to keep them undisciplined and ignorant of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.

“This is achieved by:

1. disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design and economics, and discouraging technical creativity.

2. engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence and their indulgence in emotional and physical activities by:

   1. unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media - especially the TV and newspapers.
       

   2. giving them what they desire - in excess - “junk food for thought” - and depriving them of what they really need.
       

   3. Re-writing history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant creation, thus being able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly fabricated outside priorities.
      These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social automation technology. The general rule is that there is profit in confusion; the more confusion, the more profit. Therefore the best approach is to create problems and then offer the solutions.

    

   “In Summary: Media: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, and captivated by matters of no real importance. Schools: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law, and real history.
   
   Entertainment: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level. Work: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm with the other animals.”

Recognise all that?

Of course you do. It is the world we live in and it is exactly what the Illuminati have sought to create. If we are going to repel this form of spiritual and mental exploitation we must start to think for ourselves; to get involved and to get informed about what is really going on; to make sure our children are informed and realize how they are being manipulated; to get off our knees and start to use our minds to their full potential; to reject the pressure to accept the drip, drip, drip of trivia designed to deaden our consciousness.

The best way to challenge the negative is with joy, laughter, peace and knowledge. The negative does not understand love and peace. And never underestimate your own potential and the power of your own psyche. You own it. It belongs to no-one else, not a church, guru, ascended master, piece of technology or ET.

You are connected through your higher self to all Creation.

Tap into that and no-one, but no-one, can exploit your spirit.
 

Back to Contents