by
John Gribbin
Astronomy Centre, University
of Sussex,
Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QJ
from
AstroSciences Website
The discovery of evidence for life on
Earth more than 3850 million years ago
(1) naturally encourages a
revival of speculation about the possibility that life did not
originate on Earth, but was carried to the planet in the form of
microorganisms such as bacteria, either by natural processes or
deliberate seeding of the Galaxy by intelligent beings.
This idea, known as panspermia, has a
long history
(2,
3), but it is curious that in recent decades
astronomers have tended to dismiss the possibility of panspermia on
the grounds that microorganisms could not survive the damage caused
by ultraviolet radiation and cosmic rays on their journey out of a
planetary system like the Solar System
(4) while some biologists
(5)
have argued that it is impossible for life to have emerged from
simple molecules in the limited time available (now seen to be
substantially less than 1000 million years) since the Earth formed.
This has led Crick, in particular, to
argue that the seeds of life were indeed carried to Earth (and
presumably other planets) protected inside automated space-probes, a
process he calls directed panspermia
(6).
Recently, however, Wesson and his colleagues
(7,
8,
9,
10) have pointed
out a way in which biological material could escape from a planet
like the Earth orbiting a star like the Sun by natural processes,
and survive with its DNA more or less intact. The problem is that
although microorganisms could escape from the Earth today, their
biological molecules would quickly be destroyed by radiation in the
near-Earth environment.
Bacteria shielded inside fine grains of
material such as carbon could survive in the interplanetary
environment near Earth, but would then be too heavy for the
radiation pressure of the Sun today to eject them from the Solar
System. The solution is to argue that suitably shielded microorganisms can be ejected from a planetary system like ours when
the star is in its red giant phase.
This makes it possible for natural mechanisms to seed the Galaxy
with viable life forms, and even if the biological material is
damaged on its journey, as these authors point out, even the arrival
of fragments of DNA and RNA on Earth some 4000 million years ago
would have given a kick start to the processes by which life
originated here.
The remaining puzzle about this process is how the grains of
life-bearing dust get down to Earth. In their eagerness to suggest
how microorganisms could have escaped from a planetary system, few
of the proponents of natural panspermia seem to have worried unduly
about how the life-bearing grains get back down to a planetary
surface. But the work of Wesson and his colleagues naturally leads
one to surmise that the immediate fate of the microorganisms ejected
from a planetary system during the red giant phase will be to mingle
with the other material ejected from the star, forming part of the
material of interstellar space and becoming part of an interstellar
molecular cloud.
When a new planetary system forms from
such a cloud, it is likely that the accretion processes in the circumstellar disc produce very large numbers of
cometary bodies,
which preserve intact the material of the cloud. Although the
processes of accretion of a planet like the Earth generate heat
which would destroy any microorganisms present (and which may well
have driven of all the primordial volatiles), it is likely that as the
planet cools it will be bombarded by comets containing large
amounts of primordial material (and water) down to the surface (for
a review, see
11). If this material includes
dormant bacteria, or
even fragments of DNA, life will be able to get a grip on the planet
as soon as its surface cools, as seems to have happened on Earth.
The possibility that comets may have brought the seeds of life to
Earth in this way has been discussed by, for example, McKay
(12);
but those earlier suggestions required that the organic material was
ejected from Earth-like planets inside rocky debris as a result if
meteoritic impacts. It is difficult to see how material in this form
could have become a general feature of the interstellar medium, or,
indeed, how it would get in to comets. What I propose here, in the
light of the work of Wesson and his colleagues, is that organic
material is not only a natural and widely dispersed component of the
interstellar medium, but will inevitably be incorporated into the
material from which new planets form.
The immediate difficulty faced by this hypothesis is explaining why
life did not get a grip on Venus or Mars, as well, but that is a
difficulty shared by all variations on the panspermia theme. Unlike
those other variations on the theme, though, this one is testable.
It would be feasible to obtain material from a long-period comet,
which has never previously entered the inner Solar System, and
analyze this material for traces of DNA. If the hypothesis is
correct, there should be biological material very similar to that of
life on Earth in these comets
Bibliography
(1) Holland, H. D., 1997, Science,
275, 38.
(2) Arrhenius, S., 1908, Worlds in the Making, Harper & Row, New
York.
(3) Shklovskii, I. S. and Sagan, C., 1966, Intelligent Life in
the Universe, Holden-Day, San Francisco.
(4) Chyba, C. and Sagan, C., 1988, Nature, 355, 125.
(5) Crick, F. H. C. and Orgel, L. E., 1973, Icarus, 19, 341.
(6) Crick, F. H. C., 1982, Life Itself, Macdonald London.
(7) Wesson, P. S., Secker, J., and Lepock, J. R., 1997.
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bioastronomy,
IAU Colloquium No. 161, p539, Editrice Compositori, Bologna.
(8) Secker, J., Wesson, P. S., and Lepock, J., 1996, Journal of
the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 90, 17.
(9) Secker, J., Lepock, J., and Wesson, P., 1994, Astrophysics
and Space Science, 219, 1.
(10) Wesson, P. S., 1990, Quarterly Journal of the Royal
Astronomical Society, 31, 161.
(11) Gribbin, J., in press, Stardust, Viking, London.
(12) McKay, C., 1996, Mercury, 25(6), 15.
|