from AccPC Website

recovered through WayBackMachine Website

 

Reprinted From a Newsletter on the Internet Published by "Intrigue" around Thanksgiving of 1997.

NOTE: The following publication was retreived from a newsletter published about American Computer Company, and does not neccessarily represent the opinions of ACC. It is published here for the sake of complete disclosure.


American Computer Company (http://www.american-computer.com) has been persistent: I understand that they have fired off a lawsuit (four weeks ago) with the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force, and have obtained a Court Order against the Air Force Engineering Installations and IT Divisions that may eventually compel them to release both,

a) the documents they failed to about Project Blue Book and the Roswell UFO

b) the actual debris from Roswell and an unclaimed craft that was found by the Air Force in the vicinity of Corona California in July of 1947

The craft is not "classified", Jack told me it has been dubbed "experimental military air craft" - so that it ordinarily would not be available to the public and all documents about it subject to perpetual classification. I understand that the Air Force has until the second week in January to respond and is bound irrevocably by the Order of Protection, being monitored by the Department of Justice and the US Marshall Service.

 

The lawsuit is based on "fraudulent representation of property of the United States Government" and includes writs of Habeas Corpus demanding production of documents, things and corpses, connected with the Roswell matter. ACC says it may be pending for several years, given the immediate effort by the Air Force to slow the fast track of the lawsuit, and to quell production.

ACC has also cornered President Clinton, sending one of their lobbyists to meet with him: they got him to release a statement that he has a "personal interest" in UFO-ology and wants the ultimate facts surrounding any military dossiers and Alien Hardware in the US Government's possession released to the public (but admitting that despite the fact that he is the CIC, he may not have the ability to cause the release, due to the problem with ultra-classified materials from the past, he has not yet been able to get the DoD to brief him on the project allegedly assigned to the Roswell craft, or so he said).

ACC has approached both Colin Powell and Norman Schwartzkopf about the possibility of organizing a Pro Bono Observation Team to enter and examine the alleged storage facility housing the craft. It is my understanding that the Judge Advocate General of the Army and Air Force has issued a ruling ordering a protective order on the facility, barring removal of any materials from it by the NSA and by the DoD, or any agent thereof.

ACC has asked Gen'l (ret.) Alexander Haig to join the PBOT, apparently Al Haig was one of the sources of the ACC story (although I have not confirmed this) and may be the consultant, the identity of whom Jack has been protecting.

 

(Note that Haig is working on Defense Communications based on high altitude Blimps, and that they have adopted the name of the Air Force's secret extra-terrestrial flyby monitoring system: Skystation, which is referred to in the FAX sent to ACC's technical support desk, but HAIG is not the source of that document - ACC has confirmed it came from Langley Air Force Base, and was sent them not so by accident, after the posting of their story on the Internet).

ACC has also met with estate management trustees for Walter Brittain about some documents that were in his estate when he passed away which despite his published writings, were dispositive about his having been convinced by his superiors at Bell Labs to put his name on phony patent disclosures surrounding the AT&T Transistor. I understand that the lawyers who Brittain had originally hired for his estate had passed copies to ACC for examination.

 

I understand that a document (designed to protect them from AT&T) signed by Brittain, Shockley and Bardeen may be being sought, in that it was filed with their lawyer as a means by which to convince AT&T that,

"if anything should happen to us, then our lawyers will release this letter to the public, the press and the government".

ACC has indicated they will not be adding new information to their website until almost New Years, and have asked me to serve as a "go between", limiting my postings to those who have sent me their email addresses, and to Francisco Lopez's List Serve. I believe however that they are still taking calls, but keeping their heads down and also having a very busy holiday sale season on their PCs.

 

Shulman told me he didn't want the Public coming to his website and buying PCs for the holidays as a result of any earth shattering news posted there about Roswell, so he has locked the Roswell story-well (but many of us are trying to convince him to change his mind, there are about 50 pages of things ACC does NOT want me to release in my letters to you that have my mind boggled.)

ACC has also indicated that while it has received numerous offers about books and movies concerning its story, it has withheld any agreement to the many offerers, and is working mainly on the effort to get the UFO and documents (and bodies?) produced by the Air Force for public inspection... I applaud them. I heard that they have put a lawyer between them and the many requests coming from companies, from ghost writers, from screenplay writers and many others and aren't committing to anything.

Here is an email that ACC responded to, forwarded to me from a South American journalist.


ACC's replies are under REPLY
 


Subject: NOT SO QUIET ON THE ACC FRONT.
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 00:24:03 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
X-MS-Embedded-Report:

FROM A LETTER REPLY ISSUED NOVEMBER 14, 1997:
To: acsa@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Report about ACC and Roswell
Date: Friday, October 31, 1997 8:20 AM

To the Mr. President of American Computer Company

Dear Sir,
My name is Jeferson Martinho, I am journalist, Brazilian, and I publish an electronic magazine in the Internet called "Vigilia", in which we treat the theme 'Ufology'. This is a magazine with no financial interest, looking for scientific and objectifies approach.

There is some time we are accompanying the facts exposed in the site of ACC and the unfoldings of those facts in the ambit of the ufology research.

However, after that whole time, some subjects were not totally illustrious for us. We would like to publish the history--and we took advantage of this message to request your authorization for this--and we came here to ask your collaboration, through the Internet, to elucidate some points, in case it is possible.
 


REPLY: We see no reason to believe any person who writes us is, in fact, the person he or she claims to be. Notwithstanding that fact, we are answering your email. WE wish to invite your readers to the newly updated http //american-computer.com, click on the "Roswell UFO - here's a story that rocked our world" link on the main page, read, and respond on the Opinion Form. All opinions submitted are carefully considered. It is really time we heard more from the International Community.

 

1. Why did ACC decide to place the history in its site? Which the contact point --beyond, sure, the computers-- of ACC with the past of the transistor?

REPLY: We were outraged by much of the story, and felt the Public had a right to consider it, without our claiming it to be true or false. It's the Public's right to decide if it is, in whole or in part, or if the party who related it to us, was portraying a fiction. The story is too fundamentally profound to be ignored out of hand.
 


2. ACC was, already for several times, accused of using the page on Roswell to promote spam. How does the company reject those accusations?

REPLY: Exactly how does one "promote spam" with a website? Spam is defined as the "unsolicited mailing of an email item to a third party". We do neither. We did, however, become the object of hate mail and lots of SPAM direct at shutting us down during the course of the past few months.

 

We have been publicly critical of Scott McNealy, the head of a competitor: Sun Microsystems, Inc., for advocating the SPAMMING of Bill Gates, the head of Microsoft, as was related in the New York Times, last week. That should tell you what our opinion of SPAM is.


3. An exhibition with a fantastic content still demands tests more fantastic. Do these tests exist? Which are they?

REPLY: We do not understand the specific question. Please be more specific.
 


4. The messages in the Internet revealed the occurrence of an invasion to ACC soon after the publication of the material. Did that invasion really exist?

REPLY: presumably you are referring to the "break-in" at ACC's offices. Yes, the break in took place, the front glass door was shattered and had to be replaced, and we found things missing and new things added among an inventory we took. Yes, the US Air Force OSI came to our offices, and examined the scene, then filed an entirely incorrect report with the offices of the Public Information Officer.

 

Both events are a matter of public record with the Air Force (although the report, discovered by a member of the public, is at once both incorrect AND incomplete, for reasons we are sure relate to National Security) and with the local Police Department (which aside from mentioning names and companies, is typically vague for a local police investigation - also do perhaps to the presently unsolved crime the break-in constitutes). Yet, the OSI report does not mention the break-in, and the Police Report does not mention the OSI investigation.

 

5. The same messages that talked about the invasion said that CIA had been at the building of ACC. Who did call CIA? What did happen in the chats among the employees of ACC, or you, and the agents of CIA?

REPLY: The CIA was not ever alleged to be at the building. We contacted the CIA by phone seeking their assistance to identify the unusual "Satellite" referred to in the mysterious FAX sent to our office the week before the break-in, which has been concluded to have been some kind of ruse intended to get our attention.

 

6. Which the size of ACC? Does the company cross financial difficulties?

REPLY: ACC is the spin-off of another company, but was founded in 1970. It is presently owned by Bell North America Corporation. I am not at liberty to tell you how we ended up being owned by BellNAC at this time, as the merger is still in progress. The company has experienced some expenses it didn't expect to, financially, from the cost of pursuing the ongoing investigation of the Roswell related matters, due to the 10,000 emails per day, the large number of interviews, and so on.

 

We have had one major client cancel its contracts with us because it simply doesn't believe in what we have done re the Roswell story. However, on the whole, our sales are up for the year, due to the massive drop in our system pricing since May. Today, a Pentium 200 worth $2500 at the beginning for the year, is selling for under $789. Technology marches on.
 


7. Is the placement of the history in the site of ACC a marketing play for promote the visitation to the site?

REPLY: We wish there were some benefit to us for having promoted the story with our website. If anything, our handling of the matter may have contributed to our image as being a "people oriented" business. The thousands of people who came to our website simply visited the pages relating to Roswell, and then left. How did that benefit us? It didn't. Did it benefit the public?

Certainly, as the story would never have seen the light of day in the first place, if we had not publicized it. Do we deserve a Nobel Peace Prize, as some have suggested: We do not think so, not for this. It still is our hope that we get to the bottom of this, rather than that the story end here, with the DoD having admitted to irregularities in their story, and with the NASA Astronauts insisting ACC's story is true. There is no reason to believe that we will be able to convince anyone anything, unless we can definitively announce that we have found the remains of the Roswell UFO.
 


8. Did ACC try to review the data that it obtained for confirmation for specialists and exempted researchers?

REPLY: In our opinion, there are NO researchers in the UFO Investigations Field presently equipped to cope with the enormity of this story, it is way to big for any one small group of researchers to deal with, particularly the parts involving, allegedly, Bell Laboratories and the cultural history of the Bell System.

 

We presented the story on our Web site, partly in hopes of finding the Investigation Community open to doing exactly what you have asked, but the results were not as we anticipated: to date, aside from skeptics, NONE OF WHOSE ALLEGATIONS have succeeded in refuting the story, the representatives of Bell, Motorola and the IEEE, who failed to provide any real evidence that refutes the Transistor aspects, and the representatives of the estates of Earl Lilienfield, Jack Morton, and the various parties from learned research facilities, who have done nothing but confirm most of the allegations, the answer is: where do you believe we should TURN next?


9. Do you believe in flying saucers and extraterrestrial life?

REPLY: The term "flying saucer" is a misnomer referring to "alien spacecraft", presumably. ACC can neither confirm, nor deny the existence of either. However, employees of the company are a lot less skeptical today, than they were when the story first surfaced on our website in July. We are engaging in a point by point recreation of exactly what happened during the past 5 months at this time, to see if we missed anything.

 

It is difficult to tell what we believe, right now, because in the course of recreating things, we followed a lead that has convinced us we know exactly where the remains of the so-called UFO from Roswell are. We are also intent upon pointing out to the public that the term UFO was invented by a dilemma expert, who noted that a UFO could never be "identified", because then it would be an IFO. We believe the Roswell UFO, is, in reality, an IFO.

IT's identity will have to be proven, before we will further publicize it. Furthermore: we have isolated about three distinct teams of personnel of the National Security Agency who have been laying down a steady stream of false Information in the ET Investigation Community for the past 25 years, since the days the Starpoint investigation surfaced in the midst of the Bell System, after Jack Morton was murdered.

 

They are almost single handedly responsible for maintaining a cloud of disinformation about the Roswell matter intended to hide what COULD HAVE BEEN one or more technology transfer programs involving an other-worldly species that contacted the United States Government in 1945, 1947, 1952, 1955, 1963 and later. We believe that if this lead bears fruit, there will also be a completely different explanation for events which led up to the end of World War II than has ever been contemplated before.

 

The species in question are euphemistically referred to by the NSA and DoD as the "Time Skippers", and while, assuming they are real, and we are not being fed a line of disinformation by snitches we have employed, they are not exactly Time Travellers, they are capable of travelling great expanses of space, in violation of the laws of Time - in extremely short periods of time, but are still bound by a law of the natural universe that prevents them from arriving anywhere "before they started".

 

They simply skip the time interval, supposedly, that it would take to travel tens of thousands of Light Years between stellar systems. They use a technology that reduces the mass of their craft to Zero, so as to defeat the laws of space/time. Or so the story goes... We have every reason to believe that this story is true, and preambles the Roswell Crash by several years, leading up to the crash and beyond.
 


10. Do you believe that the transistor was created starting from the extraterrestrial interference?

REPLY: See prior question.
 



Just ten questions that will contribute a lot here to the understanding of the readers of Vigília in Brazil. At once, we thanked your valuable collaboration and good will, certain of we could count with brief answer.


Our more cordial greetings,

REPLY: We hope your readers find the above information useful. We are right now between a rock and a hard place in verifying all of the information about the Time Skippers' race and point of origination, or even whether the entire thing is not just some kind of NSA ruse to further ruin our effort to reveal the Truth about Roswell.

 

If what we have alleged above is true, it involves matters even more earthshaking than the original story about the Transistor: it would imply that History is being molded by our interactions with a Race capable of traveling back and forth between our Solar System and their own, in only a few months, and who possess an enormous intellectual capacity, one about 3 times that of our own, and a much more well developed "telephathic" or "empathic" ability, or both.

 

And, the lead we are following implies that our two races are genetically related in some way. We are hopeful that this lead, however slim the possibility that it is true, pans out, or at least helps us to further evidence Disinformation plots by Intelligence Agencies, hiding some sinister secret about Alien matters they simply do not want us to find out about.