| 
			
 
 
  by Nicanor Perias, Health & Safety
 
			This article first appeared in Third 
			World Resurgence magazine 
			from
			
			NewAge Website 
			recovered through
			
			WayBackMachine Website 
			  
			Biotechnology’s benefits continue to be 
			heavily advertised. Its risks are too little discussed. Yet, unknown 
			to many, the dangers of genetic engineering have already surfaced. 
			Here are some comments on the kinds of problems that have arisen, 
			showing that the results of bio-engineering are unpredictable and 
			often dangerous.
 US scientists have transplanted the entire AIDS virus genome into 
			laboratory mice. In February 1990, scientists reported the potential 
			creation of a "SUPERAIDS’ virus as the AIDS virus combined with 
			native retroviruses in the mice. One scientist stated that the new 
			virus might be capable of airborne transmission.
 
 L-tryptophan is a natural product sold for decades at health food 
			stores to treat insomnia and depression. It was always safe for 
			consumption. However, a Japanese firm began to genetically engineer 
			the product. When it reached the market, dozens died and hundreds 
			were made seriously ill by consuming the genetically altered version 
			of L-tryptophan.
 
 Insulin is the first commercial product of genetic engineering. 
			However, some British users of the genetically engineered Insulin 
			have collapsed unconscious. No fewer than 500 diabetics filed a 
			class action suit against Eli Lilly.
 
 Thousands of children in the United States today use human growth 
			hormone produced through biotechnology. However, children are 
			unnecessarily exposing themselves to serious health problems. The 
			growth hormone may not only be expensive and ineffective, children 
			may be predisposing themselves to ill health. The use of 
			biotech-derived human growth hormone is linked with leukaemia and 
			melanoma.
 
 Bovine growth hormone (BGH) produced through biotechnology can 
			increase the milk yields of cows by 5 to 20%. Yet the European 
			Economic Community and the United States recently imposed a 7 1/2 
			year moratorium on BGH. Policy-makers were worried that the 
			large-scale use of BGH would wipe out small farms and restructure 
			the dairy industry. BGH use has also resulted in the increased 
			incidence of mastitis in cows.
 
 US government scientists engineered human growth genes into 
			permanent genetic code of pigs - hoping to create a ’super pig’ far 
			larger than normal. Instead of becoming larger, a pig was born 
			arthritic, bow-legged, and cross-eyed. Each year tens of thousands 
			of transgenic animals are being created, many engineered to contain 
			human genes.
 
 Carp, catfish, trout and salmon have been engineered with a number 
			of genes from humans, cattle and rats to increase their growth and 
			reproduction. If released into the environment the novel mutant fish 
			could mate with native species, polluting the gene pool of native 
			species quickly and permanently.
 
 Wishtar Institute of Pennsylvania could not get a permit to test its 
			biotech-created pseudo-rabies vaccine in the United States. Instead, 
			unknown to both the US and Argentinean government, it tested its 
			vaccine in Argentina. The biotech vaccine resulted in ill health in 
			animals and also infected some of the personnel involved in the 
			experiment. The Argentinean government closed down the experiment.
 
 This incomplete list of unpredictable, negative impacts of 
			biotechnology clearly shows that proponents of biotechnology cannot 
			assure the safety of their products. The potential for large damages 
			is one reason why in the United States the insurance companies, 
			which are normally the best gauge of technology risk, have refused 
			to grant insurance cover for biotech related activities. 
			Biotechnology is not going to be a new panacea that will confer 
			untold blessings to humanity. Given its current track record, 
			biotechnology can potentially be a nightmare.
 
 
 
 
			
 Genetically Engineered Food
 A Serious Health Risk
 
			Genetically Engineered 
			Foods containing genes derived from animals, fish, insect and 
			bacteria are soon to appear in the shops. The genetic changes now 
			being made to our food are completely different to those resulting 
			from traditional methods of breeding. Yet the sale of these foods is 
			to be permitted without proper assessment of the risks and without 
			adequately informing the public even though many scientists say that 
			genetically modified foods could cause serious damage to health and 
			the environment.
 
				
				What is genetic engineering?
 Genes are the blueprints for every part of an organism. Genetic 
				engineering is the process of modifying this information, 
				particularly by artificially transferring the genes specific to 
				one type of organism into another.
 
 Why do it?
 
 Scientists want to transfer desirable qualities form one 
				organism to another, for example, to make a crop resistant to a 
				herbicide or to enhance flavour in foods.
 
 Is it necessary?
 
 At first sight it may seem appealing. However, close examination 
				of the issues gives a different picture. We should by now be 
				alert to the dangers of interfering with nature. We already have 
				to feed the world’s population economically without the risks 
				posed by genetic engineering. Commercial and political motives 
				are taking precedence with little regard to the possible 
				dangers.
 
 What are the dangers?
 
 Those identified so far include:
 
					
					
					New toxins and allergens in 
					foods 
					
					Other damaging effects on health 
					caused by unnatural foods 
					
					Increased use of chemicals on 
					crops resulting in increased contamination of our water 
					supply and food 
					
					The creation of herbicide 
					resistant weeds 
					
					The spread of disease across 
					species barriers 
					
					Loss of bio-diversity in crops
					
					
					The disturbance of ecological 
					balance 
					
					The artificially induced 
					characteristics and inevitable imperfections will be passed 
					to all subsequent generations and to other related and 
					unrelated organisms. They can never be recalled or 
					contained. The consequences of this are incalculable. 
					 
				What is the position now?
 Genetically modified foods available, or about to appear, in UK 
				shops and here include tomatoes, yeast, corn and soya beans 
				(which is used in many processed foods such as bread, pasta, 
				confectionery, ice cream, pies, biscuits, margarine, meat 
				products and vegetarian meat substitutes). Genetically modified 
				organisms are also used to produce cheeses and grape seed oil. 
				But this is just the beginning. In a few years it may be almost 
				impossible to find natural food.
 
 The food industry and government appear to be complacent. They 
				assume that these new foods are not substantially different to 
				existing food and pose no special risks. But this assumption is 
				wrong and dangerous. The radical changes being made by 
				biotechnologists could not happen in nature, and have already 
				caused toxic side-effects. Currently a minimal degree of safety 
				testing is required for some foods, and none at all for others. 
				In no case is testing required on the long term impact on 
				health.
 
 Most genetically modified foods will not be labelled. Under 
				present regulations manufacturers are already introducing 
				genetically modified ingredients into some processed foods, 
				without informing consumers. The government is ignoring the 
				wishes of the public. A survey by the Consumers Association 
				found that 93% of consumers want clear labelling of all such 
				foods.
 
 We must act before it is too late!
 
 Genetically engineered foods are being introduced without regard 
				for health, yet many damaging effects will be irreversible.
 
 What is needed!
 
 It is quite clear even from existing research that a ban on 
				genetically engineered foods and a moratorium on the release of 
				all genetically modified organisms is essential to protect 
				health. In the meantime, labelling should be required for all 
				foods which contain any genetically modified ingredients, even 
				if it is only one, or where genetically modified organisms have 
				been used in the production of the food.
 
 Full disclosure labelling will allow consumers to choose what 
				they eat. It will also help scientists trace the source of 
				health problems arising from these foods.
 
 What you can do.
 
 Write to your MP and your supermarkets, the press and consumer 
				groups, expressing your concern and enclosing this article.
 
 Write to The Food Liaison Officer of the Australian & New 
				Zealand Food Authority, PO Box 7186, ACT 2610.
 
 Sign our petition. Make copies of this sheet for friends, 
				family, colleagues, students, trade unions, clubs and societies. 
				Alert everyone to the dangers.
 
 Genetic Engineering poses the greatest danger of any technology 
				yet introduced.
 
 Safety testing will never be adequate because organisms once 
				introduced can never be recalled from the environment and their 
				effects will spread without limit. If action is not taken now, 
				virtually everyone in the world will soon be eating genetically 
				engineered foods and will be at risk.
 
 For further information and solutions read:
 
					
					’Genetic Engineering: The 
					Hazards. Vedic Engineering: The Solutions’ by John Fagan 
					PhD - an award winning geneticist who returned his 
					government grants and began new research in Maharishi’s 
					Vedic Science. To order phone (02) 9977 5066. 
				Campaign to ban genetically 
				engineered food: 
					
					To support this campaign, or for 
					bulk orders of this article in leaflet form, please contact:
 The Natural Law Party
 68 Wood Street, Manly, NSW 2096
 Ph: (02) 9977 5066
 Fax: (02) 9977 0204
 
			  |