by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
August 3, 1996
from
Cassiopaea Website
This session started off with a simple
question about
the Hale-Bopp comet, but led to some startling
information...
Q: (L) This is kind of an
off-the-wall question that just popped into my head. Did we ever
ask anything about Hale-Bopp?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is Hale-Bopp going to turn planet Earth into a
super-conductor? [As I had been told by a source on the
internet.]
A: No.
Q: (L) Is Hale-Bopp the herald of the transition into 4th
density? [Another rumor I had heard.]
A: No.
Q: (L) Is Hale-Bopp going to do anything other than pass by with
a nice night-time show?
A: No.
Q: (T) Is all the brouhaha over Hale-Bopp a smoke screen?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, what is it then?
A: Hale-Bopp: Flopp!
Q: (T) Oh! The Kahoutek of the nineties! (J) The cosmic OJ
Simpson trial! Something to keep us busy...
A: Since you have broached the subject: are you familiar with
the "twin Sun" theory?
Q: (L) No. What is it? (T) Referring to our sun and the
possibility of Jupiter being a sun in the making?
A: No.
Q: (T) Okay, what is the twin sun theory?
A: Theory that the sun is really a double star.
Q: (L) Well, if it is a double star, how come we don't see the
other one? Where is the other one and why don't we see it? (T) I
don't think I have ever heard of that, have you? (F) It seems
vaguely familiar for some reason. (L) Is this factual, correct?
A: Wait a moment...
Q: (T) They are bringing in their twin sun expert... (L) No
doubt! [planchette spins numerous times.]
A: Now, where were we?
Q: (L) We were talking about the twin sun phenomenon...
A: Theory.
Q: (T) Which is that Sol is one part of a twin system?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is this theory correct?
A: Not yet, you are "jumping the gun."
Q: (T) Okay. You brought this up. You indicated that, yes, our
sun is one part of a dual system...
A: Yes...
Q: (T) ...and that there is another star, another sun here...
A: Yes...
Q: (L) Can we see it? (T) Can we see it at this point in time?
A: Can you?
Q: (L) No. Not that I am aware of. Is the reason we cannot see
it because it is always on the other side of the sun from us?
That it orbits in such a way that we can never see it?
A: Orbits, yes, assuming it is there, however, we did not
confirm that, now did we?
Q: (T) Is Sol two stars combined?
A: No. What is "dark" matter, and what are
dark stars?
Q: (L) Are dark stars something like black holes?
A: No.
Q: (T) Dark matter, that I have read about, is what the
astronomical community calls all the loose stuff floating around
out in the cosmos that must exist because of the equations, but
they can't see it.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Would dark stars be part of this?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So there is dark matter and dark stars?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) The dark matter they cannot see because it is dark.
A: Yes. How about "Brown stars?"
Q: (T) Okay, Brown stars I have heard of. There is yellow, red,
blue, green... Okay, our star burns as a yellow star because of
the matter it is composed of - hydrogen, etc.
A: Close.
Q: (T) Other stars burn different colors in the visible spectrum
because of the make-up of the star...
A: Yes, but not "brown" ones. How easy is it to see brown
against a black background?
Q: (T) Not easy at all! That is why they can't see the dark
matter...
A: That is why scientists dubbed it "brown."
Q: (L) How does brown star connect to twin sun theory?
A: Guess!
Q: (T) Okay. Let's talk about this. For some reason we have to
work through this to maintain free will. (L) Is this star small
enough that it is orbiting with the planets?
A: No, we are leading you to something, if you will be patient.
Q: (L) Okay, lead on... we want to know about this. (T) They
just asked if we understood what a brown star was.
A: Do you?
Q: (L) What is the significance of the brown star?
A: Dark star.
Q: (L) It is a dark star... okay...
A: If it is there.
Q: (L) Well, will you put me out of my misery and tell me? (T)
Wait, a dark star is dark because it doesn't give off light. It
is still a star, and acts like a star...
A: Yes. And if it has an elliptical orbit... would it, maybe,
like, "come and go?"
Q: (T) What science, astronomy, has described as double stars,
are two stars that are close together with some sort of
interactive orbit. But that is not necessarily the only way two
stars can exist.
A: Close. As you perceive from your vantage point. But how would
you like to embark on a bicycle trip between them?
Q: (L) So the ones that we are aware of and see can be so far
apart that there can be a lot between... (T) So our astronomers
have not recognized this possibility?
A: Yes they have.
Q: (T) They know, but don't talk about it. So, we may have, in
this theory, a dark star orbiting...
A: And what would happen if you did?
Q: (L) Well...
A: And it, like, comes and goes?
Q: (T) Like every 3600 years?
A: Maybe.
Q: (T) And maybe this dark star also has some planets orbiting
it?
A: Ok, change of direction: Oort cloud and comet cluster and
sun
twin occasionally passing through the former like a bowling ball
through pins.
Q: (L) How does the dark star passing through the Oort cloud
relate to the comet cluster?
A: Cause and effect.
Q: (L) So, the comet cluster is caused by the dark star smashing
through the Oort cloud? (T) Well, not necessarily smashing, but
passing close enough for its gravity to change things... (L) But
they said "like a bowling ball through pins." (T) The gravity of
that star would cause the comets to be flung in all directions.
(J) Is the earth like a pin? A bowling pin? (L) No, that's the
Oort Cloud.
A: Now, think of how your Biblical prophecies speak of
a very
terrifying period, followed by an apparent renewal of normalcy,
followed by the "End."
Q: (T) We learned about a "comet cluster" very early on. Now you
are going beyond that and giving us a reason as to why this
comet cluster...
A: Laura, please clarify exactly what the prophecies say.
Q: (L) Well, in the prophecies it is said: "If those days were
not shortened, would no flesh be saved. But, for the elects'
sake, will those days be shortened." Now, can you tell me what
this means?
A: Not yet.
Q: (T) Where are we? We have a dark star flinging comets like
bowling pins...
A: Your Biblical prophecies speak of a period of terror and
chaos followed by calm, and then, unexpectedly, amidst seeming
overwhelming peace and renewal and prosperity, the end. What
would happen if the brown star that is the sun's twin were to
get close enough to be illuminated by the sun?
Q: (T) Well, if it were close enough to be illuminated, the
obvious result is that it would be SEEN. People would panic...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Governments would fall...
A: And terror and chaos. And when it departs again?
Q: (L) Everything will seem to be fine! But, they won't realize
that the Oort cloud has been hit! Oh, sugar!
A: And then what?
Q: (L) It is not the Oort cloud or the comets that is going to
cause all this terror and carrying on, it is going to be
the
seeing of the illuminated brown star, which will go away, and
then no one will see what is coming! And this IS talked about in
both the Bible and
Nostradamus - but it was incomprehensible
before! Okay, how long will it take the comets to get from the
Oort cloud to here?
A: Let us just say that the cluster travels much faster than the
usual cometary itinerary.
Q: (T) And this is because they are traveling in the wake of a
large sun sized gravity well...
A: And we have spoken of the comet cluster before, and we have
told you that this time, it rides the Wave.
Q: (L) Is the wave the energy from this brown star?
A: No.
Q: (L) The Wave is the Wave. (T) So, the dark star is going to
come through the Oort cloud, and it doesn't have to get too
close. Any star that gets that close is TOO close. (L) Are they
being "kicked" and then they get on the wave that is already on
the move?
A: Yes. This time. You have had the comet cluster before in
antiquity, but the wave was last here aeons ago.
Q: (L) Is this wave a gravity wave?
A: Interrelated.
Q: (L) Okay, now... (T) Well, the wave is a form of energy. (L)
Yes, they once told us that it was "hyper-kinetic sensate."
A: Realm border, this is your quantum factor, Laura, so plug it
into "Noah" accordingly, and check out the results.
Q: (L) Does this brown or dark star have planetary bodies of its
own, other than sharing planets with Sol?
A: No.
Q: (T) Okay. No correlation to Sitchin and his "planet Nibiru."
(L) If the wave is the quantum factor for the transition of the
Solar System, what is the factor for the transition of an atom?
A: Electrons emit what?
Q: (L) Photons... (T) An electrical charge of some kind. (L) I
thought that an electron didn't have any parts... that it is an
elementary particle...
A: Right...
Q: (L) What the heck does an electron emit? Is gravity emitted
by an electron?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What...
A: Electromagnetically.
Q: (L) What is it that causes a quantum transition? A collecting
and dispersing of gravity. What is it about an atom that causes
it to collect or disperse?
A: How does the electron fit into the equation of the "atom?"
Q: (L) Well, it orbits the nucleus... (T) Planets orbit the Sun.
(L) The energy that an electron collects, or any other part of
an atom collects, that causes a quantum transition, comes to it
from outside of it? A wave?
A: How many electrons orbit the nucleus?
Q: (L) It depends on the atom. The number of electrons determine
what an atom is an atom of... the number of particles it has
orbiting...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And they orbit in specific shells...
A: Yes... And how does the sun relate to this macro-dynamically?
Q: (L) Okay, something from the nucleus of the atom acts upon
the electrons to cause a transition?
A: How many electrons orbit the nucleus?
Q: (L) Of the sun? Are you asking how many electrons orbit the
nucleus of the Sun? Different atoms have different numbers...
A: Of any atom?
Q: (L) Okay, it varies.
A: From what to what?
Q: (L) From one to somewhere in the nineties or hundreds...
A: And what determines the number?
Q: (T) Well, what determines the number?
A: Is it the composition of the nucleus?
Q: (L) Yeah. That's right. We forgot. What causes or determines
the number of protons or whatever in the nucleus?
A: What composition would cause the orbiting of one electron?
Q: (L) One proton?
A: Now, think macro-dynamically.
Q: (L) Well, you once said that the sun is a window, or
transition point to another density. Are you saying that the
nucleus of an atom is also a window?
A: What we are saying is the sun is a proton and its twin is an
electron!
Q: (L) Well, I am still trying to get at... the wave causes
transitions in the macro-cosmic atom, what causes the
microcosmic atom... what causes a quantum jump? What accumulates
in an atom that causes it to transition?
A: Completion of Grand Cycle.
Q: (J) It just is. (L) No, no...
A: And who says that the Sun's twin appears every 3600 years?
Q: (L) Okay, we have the 3600 year comet cluster cycle, the Sun
twin is another cycle altogether, and then we have the wave,
which is a Grand Cycle. So, we have three things causing a
transition in nature?
A: Like "biorhythms."
Q: (T) And we have a triple bad day coming up! Or a good day,
depending on which way you look at it.
A: Bad day if you are John C. Rockefeller, good day if you are
Mahatma Gandhi.
Q: (L) So, does something like a three cycle event also occur in
sub-atomic transitions, like the biorhythm?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, there are three factors to be considered... or more
than three?
A: Either, or.
Q: (L) Can it be a random, arbitrary number of events?
A: If you wish.
Q: (L) Is it partly the observer that adds one of the factors?
Consciousness?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So, we see three separate cycles coming together here...
A: Everything reflects macrodynamically and microdynamically. We
suggest you absorb for now; and, fear not! For it is not
imminent! Good Night.
Just recently we came back to the
subject:
July 4, 1998
Q: (A) I am trying to write down
some things about a cosmology, and I have some questions mainly
about the coming events. First there was the story of the sun's
companion brown star which is apparently approaching the solar
system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its
orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it
will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it
come?
A: Flat eliptical.
Q: (A) But how close will it come?
A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting
orbit of locator of witness.
Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth... (A) Solar
system... (L) Yes, but which part of the solar system? We have
nine planets... which one? (A) I understand that this brown star
will enter the Oort cloud... (L) I think they said it just
brushes against it and the gravity disturbs it...
A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has
done this on its way "in."
Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?
A: Has passed through.
Q: (A) So, it will not approach...
A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at
distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000
miles.
Q: (L) Well, 510 billion miles gives us some time! (A) Yes, but
what I want to know... this Oort cloud is around the solar
system, so this brown star, once it has passed through... (L) It
must already be in the solar system? (A) No, it could have
passed through and may not come closer. Is it coming closer or
not? Is it coming closer all the time?
A: Solar system, in concert with "mother star," is revolving
around companion star, a "brown" star.
Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is
much...
A: Less.
Q: (A) Less?
A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat,
eliptical orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system are
breached by passage of brown companion, thus explaining
anomalies recently discovered regarding outer planets and their
moons.
Q: (A) But I understand that the distance between the sun and
this brown star is changing with time. Eliptical orbit means
there is perihelion and aphelion. I want to know what will be,
or what was, or what is the closest distance between this brown
star and the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even
approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or more?
A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly
corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun.
Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that is
going to happen?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years?
A: 0 to 14.
Q: (A) Okay, that's it. I have some idea about this. Now, I
understand that, either by chance or by accident, two things are
going to happen at essentially the same time. That is the
passing of this brown star, and this comet cluster. These are
two different things?
A: Yes. Different, but related.
Q: (L) Is there a comet cluster that was knocked into some kind
of orbit of its own, that continues to orbit...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And in addition to that comet cluster, there are also
additional comets that are going to get whacked into the solar
system by the passing of this brown star?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) I understand that the main disaster is going to come from
this comet cluster...
A: Disasters involve cycles in the human experiential cycle
which corresponds to the passage of comet cluster.
Q: (A) I understand that this comet cluster is cyclic and comes
every 3600 years. I want to know something about the shape of
this comet cluster. I can hardly imagine...
A: Shape is variable. Effect depends on closeness of passage.
Q: (L) So, it could be spread out... (A) We were asking at some
point where it will be coming from. The answer was that we were
supposed to look at a spirograph.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, spirograph suggests that these comets will not come
from one direction, but from many directions at once. Is this
correct?
A: Very good!!!
Q: (A) Okay, they will come from many directions...
A: But, initial visibility presents as single, solid body.
Q: (A) Do we know what is the distance to this body at present?
A: Suggest you keep your eyes open!
Q: (A) I am keeping my eyes open.
A: Did you catch the significance of the answer regarding time
table of cluster and brown star? Human cycle mirrors cycle of
catastrophe. Earth benefits in form of periodic cleansing. Time
to start paying attention to the signs. They are escalating.
They can even be "felt" by you and others, if you pay attention.
Q: (L) We have certainly been paying attention to the signs!
A: How so?
Q: (L) Well, the weather is completely bizarre. The fires, the
heat...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) I notice that the tides are awfully high all the time
with no ostensible explanation...
A: And low, too.
Q: (L) Yes. I have noticed that particularly. (F) I have too.
Not too long ago I noticed that the tides were so incredibly low
for this time of year. (L) And also the signs in people - these
kids killing their parents, all these people going berserk - you
know...
A: Spike.
Q: (L) What do you mean spike?
A: On a graph...
Q: (L) Just spikes, not the biggie...
A: Spikes are big.
Q: (L) Well, from what you are saying about this - I mean how
are we supposed to do all these things you say we are supposed
to do? I mean, we won't have time!
A: Who says?
Q: (L) That is kind of what it is sounding like. Unless our
lives and experiences escalate in concert with all these other
events... (A) I have a last question which I have prepared. So,
we have these two physical disasters or events, the coming brown
star and the comet cluster, but we have been told that this time
it is going to be different because this time it is accompanied
by a plane convergence.
A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration.
Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field
alteration, it's supposed to be related to realms crossing or
passing. A realm border.
A: Realm. What is root of "realm?"
Q: (L) Reality.
A: Yes. How does the magnetic field "plug in?" We want to stay
on this general subject matter through this session, for your
sake.
Q: (L) Okay, in terms of these signs, these things going on on
the planet, these fires and so forth - you never said anything
about all these fires in Florida. You said Arizona was going to
burn, but you never said Florida was going to burn...
A: We did not say it would not.
Q: (L) I know. But, it is really oppressive. I have read a
couple of signs in the last day or so that we are going to have
a change in the weather, a break, is my little method of
predicting...
A: Reverse extreme?!?
Q: (L) Oh! Floods again! Well, I guess floods are better than
fires... but, maybe not!
A: Italy and Greece are burning too.
Q: (L) Yes, we noticed that in the paper today. Is there a
relationship between Italy and Greece and where we are on the
planet? Some kind of psychic link?
A: Just same current malady.
Q: (L) Okay, you just said we are going to have a reversal in
our weather. Are there any other conditions that we should be
aware of at the present time?
A: Point is to watch, look, listen.
Q: (L) When we are watching, looking and listening, is there
some particular thing we are supposed to be watching for that is
to give us a clue about something?
A: All.
Q: (L) Is there something we are supposed to do at some point
when we perceive a particular clue or event at some point?
A: What would you suggest?
Q: (L) I don't know that I would suggest anything except to keep
a low profile and keep on working until we figure out the
answer. It is like a race against time. We have to figure out
the answer because, obviously, you are not going to tell us
because such a violation of learning directive would cause soul
weakness...
A: No. No race needed.
Q: (L) Well, I sometimes feel completely inadequate for all of
this.
A: Stop thinking 3rd density!
Q: (L) Well, I don't want to just live in LaLa land and say, 'oh
yes, I'm watching. I see the signs! I'm looking! I'm listening!
And then count them off on my fingers and say: but I'm not going
to
think about it because that's 3rd density!' See what I am saying
here?
A: No, because you are still thinking 3rd density. Better to
have a "front row seat," and enjoy!
Q: (L) But I feel like I am not supposed to be enjoying myself
so much! I feel guilty!
A: Why not?
Q: (L) Well! I'm supposed to be DOING something!
A: You are.
Q: (A) When you watch, look and listen, you are getting some
signals, and these signals cause a certain pattern of thinking
which were not yet able to emerge, but now, after you receive
certain signals, you start to think in a different way. So, you
cannot now think in a different way, but when you learn this and
this has happened, then you start to think in a different
pattern. So, you cannot now do things, but you always have to be
ready to change your thinking at any moment when you understand
more, when you see more, when you notice more, when you put
things together which are not yet together. Then, there may be a
big change of perspective, a total change. And this we have to
keep our minds and thinking patterns open and ready to change,
and work and put the puzzle and mosaic together. And, this is
all that counts. It is this work that we are now doing that
counts, not some future big thing: oh! Now we go on a ship! No,
it is only doing our best, and what is it? Our best? It will
change. I believe so. That is the idea. So, everything depends
on this.
A: Yes. You see, my dear, you cannot anticipate that which is
not anticipatable.
Q: (L) Well, swell. Okay, you want to stay on this subject, so
let us move another step.
A: We are glad you noticed this birth of the spike.
Q: (L) Is that a clue? Is this one of those obscure remarks?
Yes, I noticed, the kids killing their parents, all the shooting
going on, the weather... is this connected in some way to some
other event?
A: 27 days of record heat out of 30, oh my oh my! Suggest you
awaken your internet pals, as they are too busy chasing
"goblins" to notice.
Q: (L) So, I should have something to say about this?
A: In Florida now, where to next? How about a shattering
subduction quake in Pacific Northwest of U.S.? We estimate 10.4
on the Richter scale. We have warned of Ranier. Imagine a 150
meter high tsunami in Puget Sound...
Q: (L) Does this subduction quake have anything to do with that
UFO that buried itself in the Pacific that I was told about by a
correspondent?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (L) The information I got on that was that it was about 600
mile north and east of Hawaii. A couple of submersibles were
sent down and disappeared or were destroyed or didn't come
back... it is supposedly giving off a lot of energy. Any
comment?
A: No.
Q: (L) Should I follow that direction?
A: All directions lead to lessons.
Q: (L) Now, you have mentioned this earthquake. I know that you
don't usually give predictions, why have you done so now?
A: We do not give time tables.
Q: (L) Anything else other than a tsunami in Puget Sound and a
big subduction quake... 10.4 on the Richter scale is almost
inconceivable.
A: Ranier... caldera.
Q: (L) What about the caldera?
A: Expect one.
Q: (L) Other than floods, anything else for Florida upcoming?
A: All areas experience accelerating "freak weather patterns."
Q: (L) Okay, all of these freaky weather patterns and bizarre
things going on on the planet, how does it relate to the comet
cluster and the brown star? Is it related?
A: Human experiential cycle intersects.
Q: (L) Any specific physical manifestation of either this brown
star or this comet cluster or this realm border, that is related
to these events on the planet?
A: Approach of wave stimulates precursor activity which in turn
causes effects which in turn stimulates further "heating up" of
activity...
Q: (L) I thought it was curious that you used the term 'birth of
the spike.' Is there something or someone that was born at that
particular time?
A: No. Spike is as on a graph...
Q: (L) Okay, is there anyway we could graph this ourselves, and
if so, what types of events would we include to create the
background data?
A: "El Niño, La Niña," etc...
Q: (L) Is this El Niño thing connected to sunspot cycles?
A: No.
Q: (L) It has its own cycle. I don't think it has been tracked
for long enough to get...
A: Global warming, a part of the human experiential cycle.
Q: (L) I read where
Edgar Cayce said that a slight increase in
global temperature would make hurricanes something like 5 times
stronger... given a baseline temperature. Does this mean we are
going to have stronger and more frequent hurricanes?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will they hit land more frequently, or just spin out in
the ocean?
A: Either, or. You may do as you wish, just keep one eye and one
ear tuned to current events. And, very important, log dreams.
Arkadiusz too!
Q: (L) Is there going to be some communication to us through our
dreams?
A: Visions.
Q: (L) Where will these visions originate from?
A: Ether.
Q: (L) Now, when you were talking about the weather changing
from one extreme to another, were you talking in a past sense or
future sense?
A: Both.
Q: (L) Okay, point taken. None. Is there anything else that we
should ask that we haven't asked, any subject...
A: To be continued... Good Night.
We continued...
July 11, 1998
Q: (A) I want to continue questions
from the previous session. First, about this companion star:
where is it now; which part of the zodiac?
A: Libra Constellation.
Q: (A) Where is the periodic comet cluster?
A: Not visible. It approaches in "scatter pattern," indicating
that one or two of the members may have already made the
circuit.
Q: (A) We have been told that it will look like one solid object
at first.
A: Yes, but not necessarily only one grouping. Will show up
first in the region of the Magellanic Clouds.
Q: (A) So, we have the idea. Next question concerning this
companion star; we were told that its mass is less than the sun,
can we have a figure on how much less?
A: 56 percent of the mass of the sun.
Q: (A) Okay, if this is really so, then when it really starts to
approach the solar system, and they rotate in tandem, it means
that the sun will really start to feel its gravity, and because
of this, the solar system will start to move with respect to
other stars, so all the constellations will shift, is this
correct?
A: More like a slight "wobble" effect.
Q: (L) Will that be perceptible to us here on the Earth?
A: Only through measurements.
Q: (T) There have been a lot of reports of late regarding major
solar activity, solar flares, solar winds, etc. The surface of
the sun has a whole lot going on. The last I heard, one of the
two satellites observing the sun, one of them is gone. Is this
an effect from the sun itself, or is this an effect of the
approaching brown dwarf?
A: The sun.
Q: (T) As
the brown dwarf approaches, will it intensify the
solar flare activity?
A: The effect on the physical orientation of the sun from the
periodic passage of its companion is to flatten the sphere
slightly. This returns to its original spherical shape with the
retreat.
Q: (L) Is this flattening of the sphere of the sun going to have
any noticeable effects in terms of enhanced, accelerated, or
magnified radiation from the sun?
A: No.
Q: (T) Solar flares or anything like that?
A: No.
Q: (T) So there is not going to be any appreciable effect on the
planet from this as far as the sun goes?
A: The sun's gravity increases, thus inhibiting flares.
Q: (T) Inhibiting flares is good. (L) Not necessarily. Solar
minimums have been periods of ice ages. (T) One of the recent
crop circles this year shows what the crop circle interpreters
say is an image of the sun with a large solar flare coming off
of it. It is supposed to be a warning to us that the surface of
the sun has become unstable...
A: All events intersect.
Q: (A) Okay, I would like to ask what kind of effects other than
just gravity we should expect from the close passage of this
star? Any particular electro-magnetic, gamma radiation, or what
to look for? In which part of the spectrum?
A: Radiation emits from those cosmic bodies which radiate.
Q: (L) Are you saying that the brown star does not radiate?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) If it doesn't radiate, what does it do?
A: Its radioactive field is severely limited as the "fire" went
out long ago. It does not give off light.
Q: (J) It's a brown star. (T) One or two steps away from being a
collapsing black hole. (L) Well, that's friendly, especially
after watching "Event Horizon" last night!
A: No. Black holes only form from 1st magnitude stars.
Q: (A) We have been told that there is going to be a change of
the magnetic field of the earth. Does this mean that the
magnetic pole will shift?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) About this shift of the poles, is it going to be
a
complete pole reversal?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) What is going to happen inside Earth that could cause
this magnetic pole reversal?
A: Is caused by disturbances in the mineral content of the
substrata rock, brought on by the interaction of Earth with
outside forces.
Q: (L) What specific outside forces?
A: Those already discussed.
Q: (L) What is going to be the specific mechanism of this
disturbance? Can you describe for us the steps by which this
pole reversal will take place?
A: Pole reversal is cyclical anyway, these events merely serve
as trigger mechanism.
Q: (L) Let me ask it this way: is there a charge that builds up
in the mineral substrata that requires discharge, or that
becomes excited to the point that it discharges and then
reverses? Is this what we are talking about in terms of the
mechanism?
A: Examine what is needed to magnetize metal. Ask Arkadiusz.
Q: (A) What is needed to magnetize metal. One has to align the
spins of the atoms which means one has to strike the metal, or
one has to bring a magnetic field close. (T) Strike as in
annealing... heating and striking metal or rock which causes the
crystalline structure to decompose so that the metal becomes
pliable. Then, each time it is hit, it reforms until it cools
again. (L) Is this what we are talking about here?
A: Close.
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align.
But, where is it going to come from?
A: Guess.
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (T) Now, this is just a thought: where would an external
magnetic field strong enough to do something like that come
from? On the earth, if you supercharge the ionosphere, you
create an extremely intense magnetic field. That's what the
ionosphere basically is. That is what the HAARP group of
programs is about. That is what Tesla was into - the ionosphere
- cause there is a large charge there. (L) Is the HAARP project
involved here?
A: No.
Q: (T) They are monkeying around with that stuff. (L) Do the
people in charge of the HAARP project know about all of this and
are they constructing this HAARP array to utilize this energy in
some way?
A: Those who know are at foundation.
Q: (T) To protect us?
A:
HAARP is for mind control. It is hoped it can be successful
in 4th density too!
Q: (L) Well, if these people are aware that this sort of thing
is getting ready to happen... never mind. (A) We have been told
that this magnetic disturbance is closely related to this realm
border crossing, and you asked us the question 'what is the root
of realm' and it is reality. Now, realm has an m at the end.
Does this have something to do with magnetic?
A: Realm border is when the reality shifts for all.
Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic
field disturbance? What is the connection?
A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into
the magnetic state of your environment.
Q: (L) Okay, you said before that the magnetic field is going to
reverse...
A: Magnetic poles reverse.
Q: (L) Okay, what is the magnetic field going to do. It is going
to change in some way. Is it going to increase, decrease... is
this to a degree - something other than direction -
amplification? (T) Will anything change in the strength of the
field?
A: Let us illustrate. Now: Earth. [A circle is drawn with
radiating spikes all around fairly close to the surface.] Earth
after: [A circle is drawn with double radiating spikes with
those in polar regions considerably longer than the others.]
Q: (T) So, it is the same, except it is larger?
A: Close.
Q: (T) Are you indicating that the magnetic field will be
stronger?
A: Broader and larger.
Q: (L) What is the cross in the middle?
A: Geodirectional grid reference. You incorrectly added circle
on side. Lines of magnetic field alignment should be shown as
longer at poles. "Crosshairs" in illustration are for
directional reference only.
Q: (T) Does this mean it will be stronger also?
A: Larger and broader.
Q: (A) People work near strong magnets much stronger than the
Earth's magnetic field, yet nothing happens to them that we can
see.
A: Not true. Body chemistry is altered. Is not long term or
permanent exposure.
Q: (L) So, apparently long term and permanent exposure can make
a big difference. (A) Now, you say that this brown star and the comet cluster
are coming into our solar system at the same time, and you have
said that they are different events, but that they are related.
Now, what is the relation, if not just the point in time, the
deeper relation between these two phenomena?
A: Picture biorythm graph.
Q: (A) What is the period of pole shift?
A: 100,000 years, roughly.
Q: (A) Now, about the relation between the phenomenon of
physical disasters that are going to happen and psychic changes
related to the realm border. What is cause and what is effect?
A: One precedes the other.
Q: (L) Okay, so disasters happen and then the reality changes in
psychic terms?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Is the approach of the realm border, is the change in the
magnetic field... does the reversal of the poles and the
broadening of the magnetic field, is that going to be before the
realm border crossing?
A: Intersection.
Q: (L) So, in practical terms, it may be that, what we observe
will be a series of cataclysms, disasters, the 'cleansing' of
the Earth...
A: This has already begun.
Q: (L) So, it is already happening. It will accelerate and
intensify. And what we will observe is all of these things
happening. And, as a result of the intersecting of these various
energies, this realm border, this reality change, this change in
the magnetics because of the interaction with the comet cluster,
the sun's companion, the realm border, and so forth, it will
then have an effect upon the people left on the planet who will
then change in some way as a result of this, is that correct?
A: Your Bible says that there will be many wonders on the Earth
and in the Heavens in the last days.
Q: (L) Okay, this period of time after this realm border, is
this period a preliminary to the total end of the Earth and all
life on it?
A: No.
Q: (L) After all of this change, those people who continue to be
on the Earth will be in a new environment, and it will be almost
like having to grow gills to live in water, and some people will
have the ability and some will not. Is that it? It will be more
gradual in terms of individual physical structures and psychic
structures?
A: No.
Q: (L) It will be a sudden, total change? Like flipping a switch
and everything is going to be different?
A: The key is awareness.
Q: (L) Are there going to be people...
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You didn't let me finish asking my question!
A: But we knew it!
Q: (L) In other words, there are going to be people who are
simply not going to see what is happening?
A: Lost lambs beying in the knight.
Q: (T) They are not getting it. They are lost sheep. That really
describes it. (L) Why did you give that funny twist on the
spelling?
A: Why not?
Q: (T) Now, didn't they tell us that when the transition occurs,
those who are moving to 4th density will move, and those who
aren't, won't. And that it is not a physical move. That we
really would not notice a difference when we shifted because
it's all right here. And, those who are going to shift will
shift right where they stand, and they won't really notice a
change, and the perception is not the issue, it is the awareness
of the shift, because we will still be physical... am I heading
anywhere in the right direction?
A: Variability of physicality.
Q: (L) Does this have anything to do with
changing of DNA via
awareness?
A: Both ways.
Q: (T) So, we will notice that we can control much more than we
could before in terms of our environment and physical structure,
but we will still be doing a lot of things we have always done.
(L) Now, just this last week, on Thursday, we had two
earthquakes, one in the Aleutians and one in the Azores. Is this
related to this coming subduction quake?
A: No.
Q: (T) Is there some major Earth change going to happen some
time around the end of this month or the beginning of next
month?
A: Okay, that is all folks! Good Night...
Q: (L) But I was just getting started! Good Night!
|