by Theodore C. Loder, III
Institute for the Study of
Earth, Oceans and Space
University of New Hampshire
Durham, NH 03824
from
TheDisclosureProject Website
Published
by the American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics, Inc. with permission. Presented at the
40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno
NV. Paper number AIAA-2002-1131. |
Abstract
This paper reviews the development of antigravity research in the US
and notes how research activity seemed to disappear by the mid
1950s. It then addresses recently reported scientific findings and
witness testimonies - that show us that this research and technology
is alive and well and very advanced. The revelations of findings in
this area will alter dramatically our 20th century view of physics
and technology and must be considered in planning for both energy
and transportation needs in the 21st century.
Historical Background
Townsend Brown’s
Technology of Electrogravitics [1]
In the mid 1920’s Townsend Brown [2]
discovered that electric charge and gravitational mass are coupled.
He found that when he charged a capacitor to a high voltage, it had
a tendency to move toward its positive pole. This became known as
the Biefeld-Brown effect. His findings were opposed by conventional
minded physicists of his time.
The Pearl Harbor Demonstration.
Around 1953, Brown conducted a
demonstration for military top brass. He flew a pair of 3-foot
diameter discs around a 50-foot course tethered to a central pole.
Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading
edge, they attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The
subject was thereafter classified.
Project Winterhaven.
Brown submitted a proposal to
the Pentagon for
the development of a Mach 3 disc shaped electrogravitic fighter
craft. Drawings of its basic design are shown in one of his patents.
They are essentially large-scale versions of his tethered test
discs.
Review of
Issues From the 1950s
Once Brown’s findings became well known, some scientists began to
openly speak about the flying technology of UFOs, which had been
observed extensively since the 1940s. None other than Professor
Hermann Oberth, considered by some to be one of the fathers of the
space age, who later worked in the US with
Wernher von Braun, the
Army Ballistic Missile Agency and NASA, stated the following in
1954:[3]
“It is my thesis that flying saucers
are real and that they are space ships from another solar
system.” Perhaps of more interest to our present discussion on
propulsion, he then stated that: “They are flying by the means
of artificial fields of gravity… They produce high-tension
electric charges in order to push the air out of their paths, so
it does not start glowing, and strong magnetic fields to
influence the ionized air at higher altitudes. First, this would
explain their luminosity… Secondly, it would explain the
noiselessness of UFO flight…” We now know that he was
fundamentally correct in his assessment.
In 1956, a British research company,
Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. published a classified report
on Electrogravitics Systems examining various aspects of gravity
control. They summarized the pioneering work of Townsend Brown and
then described the use of electrogravitic thrust as follows:
“The essence of electrogravitics
thrust is the use of a very strong positive charge on one side
of the vehicle and a negative on the other. The core of the
motor is a condenser and the ability of the condenser to hold
its charge (the K-number) is the yardstick of performance. With
air as 1, current dielectrical materials can yield 6 and use of
barium aluminate can raise this considerably, barium titanium
oxide (a baked ceramic) can offer 6,000 and there is a promise
of 30,000, which would be sufficient for supersonic speed.”[4]
In one of their conclusions, based on
Brown’s work, they suggested that:
“Electrostatic energy sufficient to
produce a Mach 3 fighter is possible with megavolt energies and
a k of over 10,000.”[5]
In spite of Brown’s solid research, they
later stated that,
“One of the difficulties in 1954 and
1955 was to get aviation to take electrogravitics seriously. The
name alone was enough to put people off.”[6]
It seems that is as true today as it was
in the 1950s.
A report by another British company, Gravity Rand, Ltd. in 1956,
agrees with this assessment and states:
“To assert electrogravitics is
nonsense is as unreal as to say it is practically extant.
Management should be careful of men in their employ with a
closed mind or even partially closed mind on the subject.” [7]
However, a trade press magazine, The
Aviation Report, made a numerous references to antigravity projects
and listed many of the companies pursuing research in this area.
Quotes from The Aviation Report listed in the Aviation Studies
(International) Ltd. report[8]
are suggestive of what was going on behind the scenes.
In 1954 they predicted that:
“… progress has been slow. But
indications are now that the Pentagon is ready to sponsor a
range of devices to help further knowledge.”...
“Tentative
targets now being set anticipate that the first disk should be
complete before 1960 and it would take the whole of the ‘sixties
to develop it properly, even though some combat things might be
available ten years from now.”
(Aviation Report 12 October 1954)[9]
During this time period many of the
major defense and technology companies were cited as either having
research projects or activities in this new field. For example:
“Companies studying the implications of
gravitics are said, in a new
statement, to include Glenn Martin, Convair, Sperry-Rand, and
Sikorsky, Bell, Lear Inc. and Clark Electronics. Other companies who
have previously evinced interest include Lockheed, Douglas and
Hiller.”
(Aviation Report 9 December 1955)[10]
Others of these reports mention: AT&T, General Electric, as well as
Curtiss-Wright, Boeing and North American as having groups studying
electrogravitics.
During the same time period, the Gravity Rand report notes that:
“Already companies are specializing in evolution of particular
components of an electogravitics disk.” [11]
However, in the area of predictions, the
Aviation Report stated the
following based on an extrapolation of technology development:
“Thus this century will be divided
into two parts – almost to the day. The first half belonged to
the Wright Brothers who foresaw nearly all the basic issues in
which gravity was the bitter foe. In part of the second half,
gravity will be the great provider. Electrical energy, rather
irrelevant for propulsion in the first half becomes a kind of
catalyst to motion in the second half of the century.”
(Aviation
Report 7 September 1954).[12]
Looking back it is easy to say that they
missed the mark. Did they really miss it by a half a century?
Reading through these reports it is quite obvious that there was
much interest in antigravity among a number of very high profile
companies, as well as in the Department of Defense. What happened to
this interest and why was it all downplayed during the following
four plus decades?
After all, T. Brown had shown that there is a
demonstrable connection between high voltage fields and gravity. Why
has it taken until the 1990s for more than just a few scientists to
look at these results and publish on them in the open literature? A
review of recent statements by former military personnel and
civilians connected to covert projects begins to shed light on
research activity in these areas over the last half century. And it
appears that there had been significant breakthroughs during this
time period, well shielded from both the scientific and public eye.
Recent
Scientific Developments
In this section we consider developments in the antigravity field
since the late 1980s and why the confluence of scientific findings
and the testimony of witnesses associated with the military and
covert groups indicates that a gravity solution with technological
implications has been found.
Although general relativity has not been able to explain Brown’s
electrogravitic observations, or any other antigravity phenomenon,
the recent physics methodology of quantum electrodynamics (QED),
appears to offer the theoretical framework to explain
electrogravitic coupling. Recent papers by members of the Institute
for Advanced Study Alpha Foundation - Institute of
Physics, 11 Rutafa Street, Building H - Budapest, H-1165, Hungary - are putting a solid theoretical
foundation onto the antigravity effects within the theory of
electrodynamics and include papers by Evans[13]
and Anastasozki et al.[14]
Earlier in a breakthrough paper in 1994, Alcubierre showed that
superluminal space travel is, in principle, physically possible and
will not violate the tenants of the theory of relativity[15].
Puthoff [16] later
analyzed these findings in light of the present SETI (Search for
Extraterrestrial Intelligence) paradigms that insist that we could
not be visited by extraterrestrial civilizations because of the
speed-of-light limitations dictated by the general relativity
theory. He suggests that super-luminal travel is indeed possible.
This leads to reduced-time interstellar travel and the possibility
of extraterrestrial visitation, which our limited under-standing of
physics and scientific arrogance has “forbidden” in some sectors for
most of the 20th century.
The second aspect of these physics findings deals with
the zero
point or vacuum state energy shown by the Casimir effect, which
predicts that two metal plates close together attract each other due
to imbalance in the quantum fluctuations. The implications of this
zero point or vacuum state energy are tremendous and are described
in several papers by Puthoff[17]
starting during the late 1980s. A detailed bibliography on this and
similar topics is available on the WWWeb.[18]
Bearden [19]
and colleagues have also written extensively on the theoretical
physics of
zero point energy and additionally have described various
technological means of extracting this energy (for example see the
recent paper by Anastasozki et al.[20]).
A theoretical book on zero point energy by Bearden will soon be
available.[21] There
is significant evidence that scientists since Tesla have known about
this energy, but that its existence and potential use has been
discouraged and indeed suppressed over the past half century or
more. [22]
The coupling of the electrogravitic phenomena observations and the
zero point energy findings are leading to a new understanding of
both the nature of matter and of gravity. This is just now being
discussed in scientific journals (though some evidence suggests that
it has been understood for decades within the black project covert
community). The question that is being addressed is: what keeps the
universe running? Or more specifically, where do electrons get their
energy to keep spinning around atoms? As electrons change state they
absorb or release energy, and where does it come from? The
simplistic answer is that it is coming from the vacuum state.
Puthoff [23]
describes the process as follows:
“I discovered that you can consider
the electron as continually radiating away its energy as
predicted by classical theory, but SIMULTANEOUSLY ABSORBING a
COMPENSATING AMOUNT of energy from the ever-present sea of
zero-point energy in which the atom is immersed. An equilibrium
between these two processes leads to the correct values for the
parameters that define the lowest energy, or ground-state orbit
(see "Why atoms don’t collapse," NEW SCIENTIST, July 1987). Thus
there is a DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM in which the zero-point energy
stabilizes the electron in a set ground-state orbit. It seems
that the very stability of matter itself appears to depend on an
underlying sea of electromagnetic zero-point energy.”
Furthermore, it appears that it is the
spinning of electrons that provides inertia and mass to atoms. These
theories, linking electron spin, zero point energy, mass, and
inertia have been presented in a number of recent papers, such as
those by Haisch[24]
and colleagues and provide us with a possible explanation of the Biefield-Brown effect. It appears that an intense voltage field
creates an electromagnetic barrier that blocks the atomic structure
of an atom from interacting with the zero point field. This slows
down the electrons, reducing their gyroscopic effect, and thus
reducing atomic mass and inertia, making them easier to move around.
Evidence of Extensive Antigravity
Technology
The B-2 Advanced
Technology Bomber
In 1993,
LaViolette wrote a paper[25]
discussing the B-2 bomber and speculating on its probable
antigravity propulsion system, based on a solid understanding of
electrogravitics,[26]
the aircraft’s design and the materials used in its manufacture. It
appears that the craft is using a sophisticated form of the
antigravity principles first described by T. Brown. Support for this
thesis came from the Aviation Week and Space Technology (March 9,
1992), which reported that the B-2 bomber electrostatically charges
its leading edge and its exhaust stream.
Their information had come from a small
group of former
black project research scientists and engineers
suggesting the B-2 utilizes antigravity technology. This information
was supported by Bob Oechsler, an ex-NASA mission specialist who had
publicly made a similar claim in 1990. These findings support the
contention that there have been major developments in the area of
antigravity propulsion which are presently being applied in advanced
aircraft.
LaViolette later states the obvious that,
“the commercial airline
industry could dramatically benefit with this technology which would
not only substantially increase the miles per gallon fuel efficiency
of jet airliners, but would also permit high-speed flight that would
dramatically cut flight time.”[27]
The Disclosure
Project Witnesses
On May 9, 2001 a private organization, “The Disclosure Project”[28]
held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington DC.
They presented nearly two dozen witnesses including retired Army,
Navy and Air Force personnel, a top FAA official, members of various
intelligence organizations including the CIA and NRO, and industry
personnel, all of whom who had witnessed UFO events or had inside
knowledge of government or industrial activities in this area.
They also produced a briefing document[29]
for members of the press and Congress and a book[30]
which includes the testimony of nearly 70 such witnesses from a pool
of hundreds. Although they all spoke of the reality of the UFO
phenomena, many also spoke of covert projects dealing with
antigravity, zero point energy technologies and development of alien
reproduction vehicles (ARVs) by US
black project and covert
interests. The following excerpted quotes from these witnesses
support the above contentions.
Dan Morris[31] is a
retired Air Force career Master Sergeant who was involved in the
extraterrestrial projects for many years. After leaving the Air
Force, he was recruited into the super-secret National
Reconnaissance Organization (NRO), during which time he worked
specifically on extraterrestrial-connected operations. He had a
cosmic top-secret clearance (38 levels above top secret) which, he
states, no U.S. president, to his knowledge, has ever held.
“UFOs are both extraterrestrial and
man made. Well, the guys that were doing the UFOs, they weren’t
sleeping, and Townsend Brown was one of our guys who was almost
up with the Germans. So we had a problem. We had to keep
Townsend Brown - what he was doing on anti-gravity
electromagnetic propulsion secret.”
He then describes a type of zero point
energy device.
“Well, if you have one of these
units that’s about sixteen inches long and about eight inches
high and about ten inches wide, then you don’t need to plug into
the local electric company. These devices burn nothing. No
pollution. It never wears out, because there are no moving
parts. What moves are electrons, in the gravity field, in the
electronic field, and they turn in opposite directions, okay?”
“Dr. B.”[32]
(name withheld since he still works in this area) is a scientist
and engineer who has worked on top-secret projects almost all
his life. Over the years he has directly worked on or had
involvement with such projects involving anti-gravity, chemical
warfare, secure telemetry and communications, extremely
high-energy space based laser systems, and electromagnetic pulse
technology.
“Anti-gravity. As a matter of fact, I used to go out to the
Hughes in Malibu. They had a big think tank up there. Big
anti-gravity projects; I used to talk to them out there. I’d
give them ideas, because they bought all my equipment. But the
American public will never, never hear about that.” . . .
“This flying disc has a little
plutonium reactor in it, which creates electricity, which drives
these anti-gravity plates. We also have the next level of
propulsion, it is called virtual field, which are called
hydrodynamic waves…”
Captain Bill Uhouse[33]
served 10 years in the Marine Corps as a fighter pilot, and four
years with the Air Force at Wright-Patterson AFB as a civilian doing
flight-testing of exotic experimental aircraft. Later, for the next
30 years, he worked for defense contractors as an engineer of
antigravity propulsion systems: on flight simulators for exotic
aircraft - and on actual flying discs.
“I don’t think any flying disc
simulators went into operation until the early 1960s - around
1962 or 1963. The reason why I am saying this is because the
simulator wasn’t actually functional until around 1958. The
simulator that they used was for the extraterrestrial craft they
had, which is a 30-meter one that crashed in Kingman, Arizona,
back in 1953 or 1952.”
“We operated it with six large capacitors that were charged with
a million volts each, so there were six million volts in those
capacitors.” . . .
“There weren’t any windows. The only
way we had any visibility at all was done with cameras or
video-type devices.” . . .
“Over the last 40 years or so, not
counting the simulators - I’m talking about actual craft - there
are probably two or three-dozen, and various sizes that we
built.”
“A.H.”[34]
formally of Boeing Aerospace, is a person who has gained
significant information from inside the UFO extraterrestrial
groups within our government, military, and civilian companies.
He has friends at the NSA, CIA, NASA, JPL, ONI, NRO, Area 51,
the Air Force, Northrup, Boeing, and others.
“Most of the craft operate on antigravity and electrogravitic
propulsion. We are just about at the conclusion state right now
regarding antigravity. I would give it maybe about 15 years and
we will have cars that will levitate using this type of
technology. We’re doing it up
at Area 51 right now. That’s some
of the stuff that my buddy worked on up at Area 51 with Northrup,
who lives now in Pahrump, Nevada. We’re flying anti-gravity
vehicles up there and in Utah right now…”
Lieutenant Colonel Williams[35]
entered the Air Force in 1964 and became a rescue helicopter pilot
in Vietnam. He has an electrical engineering degree and was in
charge of all the construction projects for the Military Air
Command. During his time in the military he knew that there was a
facility inside of Norton Air Force Base in California that no one
was to know about.
“There was one facility at Norton
Air Force Base that was close hold - not even the wing commander
there could know what was going on. During that time period it
was always rumored by the pilots that that was a cover for in
fact the location of one UFO craft.”
Note that all he knew was of the rumor,
however, it is confirmed by the next testimony, which also confirms
some of the comments made by Captain Uhouse.
Mark McCandlish[36]
is an accomplished aerospace illustrator and has worked for many of
the top aerospace corporations in the United States. A colleague,
with whom he studied, has been inside a facility at Norton Air Force
Base, where he witnessed alien reproduction vehicles, or ARVs, that
were fully operational and hovering. He states that the US not only
has operational antigravity propulsion devices, but we have had them
for many, many years, and they have been developed through the
study, in part, of extraterrestrial vehicles over the past fifty
years.
A close friend, Brad Sorensen, told him of visiting The Big Hangar,
during an air show at Norton Air Force Base on November 12, 1988 and
how he had seen flying saucers in this hangar.
“There were three flying saucers
floating off the floor—no cables suspended from the ceiling
holding them up, no landing gear underneath—just floating,
hovering above the floor. He said that the smallest was somewhat
bell-shaped. They were all identical in shape and proportion,
except that there were three different sizes. They had little
exhibits with a videotape running, showing the smallest of the
three vehicles sitting out in the desert, presumably over a dry
lakebed, some place like Area 51. It showed this vehicle making
three little quick, hopping motions; then [it] accelerated
straight up and out of sight, completely disappearing from view
in just a couple of seconds—no sound, no sonic boom—nothing.”
“Well, this craft was what they
called the Alien Reproduction Vehicle; it was also nicknamed
the
Flux Liner. This antigravity propulsion system—this flying
saucer—was one of three that were in this hangar at Norton Air
Force Base. [Its] synthetic vision system [used] the same kind
of technology as the gun slaving system they have in the Apache
helicopter: if [the pilot] wants to look behind him, he can pick
a view in that direction, and the cameras slew in pairs.
[The pilot] has a little screen in
front of his helmet, and it gives him an alternating view. He
[also] has a little set of glasses that he wears—in fact, you
can actually buy a 3-D viewing system for your video camera now
that does this same thing—so when he looks around, he has a
perfect 3-D view of the outside, but no windows. So, why do they
have no windows? Well, it’s probably because the voltages that
we’re talking about [being] used in this system were probably
something between, say, half a million and a million volts of
electricity.”
Brad Sorensen stated that at the
ARV
display, “a three star general said that these vehicles were
capable of doing light speed or better.”
All of these witness testimonies do not
prove the existence of a successful US covert program in antigravity
technologies. Only the demonstration of such craft coupled with the
accompanying government and technical specification documents would
‘prove’ this. However, these testimonies coupled with information
from other substantial sources such as Nick Cook’s new book
mentioned below, strongly supports this contention.
The Hunt for
Zero Point
[37]
Although this very recent book (August, 2001) is not yet available
in the US, it contains some of the strongest evidence yet for major
efforts and success in the field of antigravity technology. The
author, who for the past 15 years has been the Aviation
Editor and Aerospace Consultant for Jane’s Defense Weekly, spent the
last 10 years collecting information for the book. This included
archival research on
Nazi Germany’s antigravity technology and
interviews with top officials at NASA, the Pentagon and secret
defense installations.
He shows that America has cracked the
gravity code and classified the information at the highest security
levels. Because antigravity and its allied
zero point energy
technologies potentially offer the world a future of unlimited,
non-polluting energy it has been suppressed because of the “huge
economic threat”. His findings support those reported by many of the
Disclosure Project witnesses cited above.
Antigravity
Technology Demonstrations
Although T. Brown reported many of his findings nearly a half
century ago, other experimenters have just recently begun to
reproduce his work and report it in the open literature and on the WWWeb. For example,
Davenport[38]
published the results of his work in 1995 supporting the findings of
T. Brown. More recently,
Transdimensional Technologies
[39]]
in the USA and
J. Naudin
labs [40]
in France have posted on the WWWeb: diagrams, web videos, and
data on their versions of antigravity “Lifters” based on an
extension of Brown’s work. It is a sad commentary on this whole area
of research to see that public science is requiring us to
demonstrate principles that were demonstrated nearly fifty years
ago.
There have also been a number of other demonstrations of
“antigravity” phenomena by researchers throughout the world. This
includes the work of Brazilian physics professor,
Fran De Aquino,
and such devices as:
-
the Searl Electrogravity
Disc
-
the Podkletnov Gravity
Shield and Project Greenglow
-
the Zinsser Kineto-baric
Field Propulsion
-
the Woodward Field Thrust
Experiments on Piezoelectrics
All of these are described in more
detail by Greer and Loder.[41]
Implications of This
Research
• Antigravity and zero point energy
research and their applications are finally being addressed by
some of the open scientific community. This means there will
have to be a rewriting of textbooks in this area so our new
generation of students can apply this “new knowledge.” Its
application will lead to major breakthroughs in transportation
technologies both earthside and in outer space. The implications
are that we have the potential for human exploration of our
solar system and beyond, if we have the will, within our
lifetimes. It also means that the majority of 20th century space
technology will be obsolete and in fact may already be so.
• The zero point or vacuum state energy source is seen as a
totally non-polluting energy source, which has the potential to
replace all the fossil fuels on this planet. It also will
provide the energy needed for long range space flights. This
means that fuel cells and solar cells in common use today for
space flight energy applications will only be needed until we
transition to these new energy technologies.
• Based on an analysis of trends in antigravity research over
the last half-century and the information provided by numerous
witnesses, it appears that there is both good and bad news. The
good news is that it appears that we (at least covert projects)
have already developed the theories of antigravity, and
additionally have developed working spacecraft based on these
principles. The bad news is that these technologies have been
developed for at least several decades, at the public’s expense
and that human kind has been deprived of these technologies,
while continuing to waste energy using less efficient and
pollution enhancing technologies.
Supporting this contention is the
following quote from Ben Rich, former head of the Lockheed Skunkworks. Just prior to his death, he stated to a small group
after a lecture that:
“We already have the means to travel
among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black
projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to
benefit humanity…”
He further went on to say that,
‘anything you can imagine we already know how to do.’ Strong words
from a knowledgeable deep insider and words that support what a
number of the witnesses stated as well.
• As the reality of this knowledge
begins to be understood, there will be an outcry among space
scientists not on the inside for release of these technologies
to allow all of us to explore space. There will be major changes
in the way that NASA does its business, though predicting these
changes is difficult.
• Not only has space exploration in the public sector suffered,
but our planet’s environment has suffered as well. Thus as this
knowledge begins to sink in there will be an outcry among all
concerned citizens on this planet for release of these
technologies to allow all of us to reduce and ultimately
eliminate global warming and environmental pollution that so
threatens our way of life. These technologies will not only
affect space travel technologies, but will also have a profound
effect on transportation and energy production on the earth’s
surface.
• In conclusion, we might consider the observation made by
Halton Arp [42]:
“We are certainly not at the end
of science. Most probably we are just at the beginning!”
Acknowledgements
I thank the following people for many discussions while preparing
and writing this paper including:
References Cited
[1] Quoted from: LaViolette, P. A.
2000. Moving Beyond the First Law and Advanced Field Propulsion
Technologies. In T. Loder (ed.), “Outside-the-Box” Technologies,
Their Critical Role Concerning Environ-mental Trends, and the
Unnecessary Energy Crisis. Report prepared for The U.S. Senate
Environment and Public Works Comm.
www.senate.gov/~epw/loder.htm.
[2] Brown, T. T. 1929. How I control gravity. Science and
Information Magazine, Aug. 1929. Reprinted in Psychic Observer
37 (1): 66-67.
[3] Oberth, Hermann: “Flying Saucers Come from a Distant World,”
The American Weekly, October 24, 1954.
[4] Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electro-gravitics
Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic
counterbary and barycentric control. p. 14. In Valone, T. (ed.),
1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion
methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.
[5] Ibid. p. 27.
[6] Ibid. p. 19.
[7] Gravity Rand Ltd. 1956. The Gravitics Situation. p. 54. In
Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a
new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute,
Washington, DC 20005.
[8] Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electrogravitics
Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic
counterbary and barycentric control. p. 11. In Valone, T. (ed.),
1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion
methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.
[9] Ibid. p. 34.
[10] Ibid p. 41.
[11] Gravity Rand Ltd. 1956. The Gravitics Situation. p. 47. In
Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a
new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute,
Washington, DC 20005.
[12] Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956.
Electrogravitics Systems: An examination of electrostatic
motion, dynamic counterbary and barycentric control. p. 32. In
Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a
new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute,
Washington, DC 20005.
[13] Evans, M. W. 2002. The link between the Sachs and O(3)
theories of electrodynamics. In Evans, M.W. (ed.), Modern
Nonlinear Physics, Pun 2. 2nd ed., Advances in Chemical Physics
19:469-494.
[14] Anastasovski, P.K., T.E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W.T.
Coffey, L.B. Crowell, G.J. Evans, M.W. Evans, R. Flower, A.
Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. Mészáros, P.R. Molnár, S. Roy, and
J.-P. Vigier. (In Press). Anti gravity effects in the Sachs
theory of electrodynamics Foundations of Physics Letters.
[15] Alcubierre, M. 1994. The Warp Drive: Hyper-fast travel
within general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11,
L73.
[16] Puthoff, H. E. 1996. SETI, The Velocity-of-Light
Limitation, and the Alcubierre Warp Drive: An Integrating
Overview, Physics Essays 9:156.
[17] Puthoff, H. 1989. Gravity as a Zero-Point Fluctuation
Force." Phys. Rev A., 39(5):2333-2342.
Puthoff, H. 1989. Source of Electromagnetic Zero-Point Energy."
Phys. Rev A, 40(9):4597-4862.
[18]
www motionsciences.com
Joe Firmage
[19] See the Tom Bearden web site for an extensive listing and
copies of his papers at: www.cheniere.org.
[20] Anastasovski, P.K., T.E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W.T.
Coffey, L.B. Crowell, G.J. Evans, M.W. Evans, R. Flower, A.
Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. Mészáros, P.R. Molnár, J.K. Moscicki,
S. Roy, and J.P. Vigier. 2001. Explanation of the motionless
electromagnetic generator with 0(3) Electrodynamics. Foundations
of Physics Letters, 14(1):87-93.
[21] Bearden, T. 2002. Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and
Principles. World Scientific (In Press).
[22] Valone, T. 2000. The Right Time to Develop Future Energy
Technologies. in T. Loder (ed.). “Outside-the-Box” Technologies,
Their Critical Role Concerning Environmental Trends, and the
Unnecessary Energy Crisis. Report prepared for The U.S. Senate
Environment and Public Works Comm.
www.senate.gov/~epw/loder.htm.
[23] Puthoff, H. 1990. Everything for Nothing. New Scientist, 28
July 1990, pp. 52-55.
[24] Haisch, B., Rueda, A. and Puthoff, H. 1994. Beyond E =mc2
; A First Glimpse of a Postmodern Physics, in which Mass,
Inertia and Gravity Arise from Underlying Electromagnetic
Processes. The Sciences, 34:26.
Haisch, B., Rueda, A., and Puthoff, H. 1997. Physics of the
Zero-Point Field: Implications for Inertia, Gravitation and
Mass. Speculations in Science and Technology, 20:99.
Haisch, B. and Rueda, A. 1998. An Electromagnetic Basis for
Inertia and Gravitation: What Are the Implications for 21st
Century Physics and Technology? in El-Genk, M. S. (ed.), Space
Technology and Applications International Forum-1998, DOE
CNF-980103, CP420, p. 1443.
Haisch, B. and Rueda, A. 1999. The Zero-Point Field and the NASA
Challenge to Create the Space Drive. Proc. NASA Breakthrough
Propulsion Physics Workshop, NASA/CP-1999-208694, p. 55.
[25] LaViolette, P. 1993. The U.S. Antigravity Squadron. p.
82-101. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems:
Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research
Institute, Washington, DC 20005.p.82-101.
[26] LaViolette, P. A. 1992. Electrogravitics: Back to the
future. Electric Spacecraft, Issue 4, pp. 23-28.
LaViolette, P. A. 1993. A theory of electrogravitics. Electric
Spacecraft, Issue 8, pp. 33-36
[27] LaViolette, P. A. 2000. Moving Beyond the First Law and
Advanced Field Propulsion Technologies. in T. Loder (ed.).
“Outside-the-Box” Technologies, Their Critical Role Concerning
Environmental Trends, and the Unnecessary Energy Crisis. Report
prepared for The U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Comm.
www.senate.gov/~epw/loder.htm.
[28] Information available at:
www.disclosureproject.org.
[29] Greer, S.M. and T.C. Loder III. 2001. Disclosure Project
Briefing Document, 492 pp. Available on CD from: The Disclosure
Project, P.O. Box 2365, Charlottesville, VA 22902. Also
available from:
www.disclosureproject.org.
[30]
Greer, S. M. 2001. Disclosure:
Military and government
witnesses reveal the greatest secrets in modern history.
Crossing Point, Inc. Crozet, VA, 573 pp.
[31] Ibid. pp. 357-366.
[32] Ibid. pp. 262-270.
[33] Ibid. pp. 384-387.
[34] Ibid. pp. 391-403.
[35] Ibid. pp. 388-389.
[36] Ibid. pp. 497-510.
[37] Cook, N. 2001.
The Hunt for Zero Point.
[38] Deavenport, L. 1995. “T.T. Brown Experiment replicated.
Electric Spacecraft Journal. Issue 16. Oct. 1995. (Reprinted in:
Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electro-gravitics Systems: Reports on a
new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute,
Washington, DC 20005)
[39] Transdimensional Technologies, 906-E Bob Wallace, Ave.,
Huntsville, AL 35801.
[40]
http://jnaudin.free.fr
[41] Greer, S.M. and T.C. Loder III. 2001. Disclosure Project
Briefing Document, 492 pp. Available on CD from: The Disclosure
Project, P.O. Box 2365, Charlottesville, VA 22902. Also
available from:
www.disclosureproject.org.
[42] Arp, H. 1998. Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic
Science. Montreal, Aperion. (p. 249).
|