Introduction to the Mechanism of Holographic
Control
Source: Beyond
Duality
What do we mean by holographic control? We need a system which not
only gives rise to motion, such as of a particle, object, or any natural entity,
but one which must intrinsically keep track of the entity's change of position.
The purpose of the control system is its ability to accurately identify, via
reference and context, the precise location of the entity and 'know' instantly
its new position when any change is accomplished by means of the system. The
entity in question could be a finger or limb in coordination of physical
movements (the holographic computer system manifests within the kinesthetic
sense--see later articles), or a particle in the case of an advanced physics
theory which requires that even a random particle's position is known from a
higher perspective (though not it would seem in the well-known chaos phenomenon
(of chaos theory). Such entity control would extend to all bodies in the
universe: planets, stars, galaxies, etc. Why is the control holographic? Here,
we only need answer that it is infinitely superior to any other system and is a
natural manifestation of all the universe's computer principles, for example,
the kinesthetic sense, referred to above, is also the memory.
Why is it a superior system? Let us give a simple answer to this
question with an analogy. Consider a scale of control: systems ranging from very
poor control, to perfect control. At the bottom of this scale we could place the
activity of striking a ball with a bat. There is a little control over the
ball's direction and position at the moment of impact with the bat. No more
control can be exercised after impact and there is no access to the ball's
whereabouts, that is, no direct reference (except of course by projection from
its initial conditions at the moment of impact).
Let us now move up this scale of increasing control. We could tie
a piece of string to the ball, or object. As we pull on the string we move the
object. We are in virtually continuous but indirect contact with the object. It
is clearly still a very poor method. The string connects the object to a
reference system, but it is flexible. Let us make it rigid as we ascend the
scale of increasing control.
Consider a thin rigid rod connected to the object. This definitely
provides us with greater control. The object's motion and position is easily
predictable as the other end of the rod is moved about. We now have an
efficiency commensurate with the coordinate axes method in our mathematics. A
location in the plane of X and Y can be referenced accurately by means of the
axes, X and Y, that is, in two dimensions. This can easily by extended to three
dimensions by adding a Z axis. However, it doesn't matter how many dimensions we
add we do not have a system which is highly directionally versatile and it is
deficient in what we can call contiguity of reference and also context. It works
only under the special axes conditions specified. The system is highly
preferential. A strong failing in the tests of truth in physics. What we are
stating here will become clearer as we move on now to the top of this scale of
increasing control.
At this level we have the universe's holographic control method.
Let us go back to the demonstration of the object and the rigid rod. We now
imagine an infinite number of such rods (if the rod was infinitely thin)
connected all around the object such that the rods merge and form a solid sphere
encompassing the object.
We can now envisage that if we were somehow in contact with the
total surface of this sphere, because of its rigidity and its complete
circumferential contiguity in all directions, we would also be effectively in
'contact' with the object at the centre.
As an application at this point we could imagine the whole solar
system enveloped by this sphere, and the object is, say, our planet Earth,
embedded a distance from the centre where the sun is located. If we imagine
spinning this rigid sphere we can recognise the great stability of the planet
Earth in its orbit. The implication is that each element making up the volume of
the solar system is contributing towards the motion, accuracy and predictability
of the planet.
Compare this with the Newtonian system of the balance of a
centrifugal force and a gravitational force holding the planet in a 'stable'
orbit. If this were the only mechanism the whole universe would fall apart in
seconds. But what about Einstein's relativity you might ask? Einstein's
geometrical interpretation of gravity and his space curvature are in fact direct
properties of the holographic machinery. Relativity unfortunately does not have
an understanding of the mechanism behind Einstein's space topology.
Let us return to the object embedded within the rigid sphere. We
now replace the rigid spherical envelope with infinitely superimposed quantum
fields. At this stage, if one doesn't have any conception of superimposed
quantum fields, one can merely imagine these as electromagnetic, electrical, or
energy fields. These fields are just as effective in producing complete
rigidity. There are no discontinuities or interstitial emptiness in this
configuration.
At this point, the idea is to appreciate that the whole volume of
this 'sphere' is contributing towards the motion and identification of the
entity's location. It may appear that for this particular volume of energy field
there could not be any further connections to the object, since it is surrounded
by them completely. However, this is not the case. The holographic control is
higher dimensional. This means the energy sphere extends in time. This extension
though is spatial, that is, all at once. The diameter of the spatial 3D energy
sphere must be imagined as having a diameter in time--it is 4D. What does this
mean? It means that future positions of the object within this span in time are
all contributing to the object's motion in present time. There is a holistic
relationship between all parts, in both space and time, of this particular span.
For instance, the degree of this span (unification or integration), in the
subject of learning patterns, involved in physical skills, is the precise
measure of the ability achieved (skill, technique, coordination).
We might see that a system which utilises the space all around an
object and also the space in time, forms the basis for maximum control of, and
access to, the object. In fact a 4D system is absolutely essential. A 3D
configuration can have no true control since it can't 'predict' the immediate
future by sensing it now, and therefore doesn't know where to go (we are talking
about self-contained instantaneous quantum mechanisms).
Now the intelligent reader may say this is all very well but all
you have done is transferred the same problem we began with to another level,
that is, from the object to the new surface--we have apparently gone from how to
control the object to controlling the enveloping spherical fields!
Firstly, we have yet to handle this 'outer' surface of these
fields as to where they go or fit into the scheme. Secondly, we have achieved
something already. We have connected the idea of controlling a surface to
controlling a volume. The above argument implies that the surface of the object
is not absolute but relative; that the energies of the object extend externally
and also internally. For a spherical object, picture infinite concentric spheres
(touching) extending outward and inward. (The reader may by all means use the
model of the tesseract--a cube inside another cube with the corners
connected--if it helps.) As we shall see later this is the essential energy
framework of the atom and in fact all natural entities.
The subject of nature's computer system is an immense one, and as
the reader can see we have only touched the surface of one particular facet,
holographic control, with barely a reference to holographic properties. This
will be elaborated upon in proceeding articles.
by Noel Huntley, Ph.D.
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/Holocontrol.htm