|
by
Neil Freer
from
SapiensRising Website
Addressed To:
-
Glenna C. Burmer, M.D., Ph.D
-
Eric Drexler, Ph.D
-
Ralph Merkle, Ph.D
-
Douglas B. Kell, Ph.D
-
Craig Venter, Ph.D
-
National Center For Genetic Resources
-
The Institute For Neural Cryobiology
-
Alcor Life Extension Foundation
Overview
Geneticists, generally trained within some form of evolutionary
paradigm, assume it as the underlying context within which they
search and interpret. This paper, written by a generalist for
scientists, is submitted as a brief to inform the reader of an
archaeological paradigm, developed over a century and a half, which
renders outmoded, corrects and subsumes both the Darwinian
evolutionary and creationist models, as related to human history,
and provides an expanded, fresh perspective on DNA research.
The most fundamental, critical obstacle blocking interpretive and
explanatory progress in the sciences – as well as our educational,
political and social processes -- is our lack of a consensual
definition of what a generic human being is, what it is to be
generically human. Theological, philosophical, scientific and new
age definitions rattle around in a criteria vacuum. The
creationist-evolutionist conflict is a single, classic example of
how effectively we have been Babel-factored into ineffective
argument without closure for decades.
The thesis of the Sumerian scholar,
Zecharia Sitchin (1976),
provides a robust paradigm which affords the resolution of this,
objectively astounding, enervating and divisive problem at the heart
of western culture. It frees the discussions of the science, ethics,
and philosophy involved from the recycled contexts, criteria and
syllogistic gambits which have stultified the western intellect for
so long. Its startling anthropological ramifications provide, not
only a generic definition of what a human is but, through a
recovered and restored history of our bicameral genome’s initiation
and evolution, no less than a key to the decipherment and
interpretation of the human genome itself. Correlated with the
current data from the
genome projects,
general genetics,
cloning,
and related areas it, further, furnishes vital clues to an
explanation of the anomalous fact of our presenting with four
thousand plus and counting genetic diseases, a possible reason for
so-called “junk” genes, and indicators as to why we should possibly
expect to find certain suppressed genes. A potentially vital and
startling contribution to human history by the science of genetics,
as a spin off of the current ongoing genome research, is suggested.
Part 1:
A synopsis of Sitchin’s archaeological thesis
Part 2: The evidential proof of Sitchin’s thesis
Part 3: The ramifications of that thesis; major objections answered
Part 4: The genetic implications and clues afforded
Selected Reading
Return to Temas/Genetica
Return to Neil Freer
Zecharia Sitchin is one of two hundred Sumerian and Semitic scholars
on the planet who can read a clay tablet like you and I can read
this text. He published his first work, The Twelfth Planet, in 1976
and, subsequently, another six volumes of the Earth Chronicle
Series. From his knowledge of Sumerian, the Semitic and other
ancient languages and his research on the same archaeological and
Biblical data and materials studied by all archaeologists, acquired
over the last one hundred and fifty years, he put forth a radical
thesis: the transcultural “gods” known to all the ancient cultures
(Sumerian: Anunnaki, meaning “those who came down from the heavens”)
were not mythological but real flesh and blood humanoid aliens, very
much like humans, who had come here from the tenth planet in our
solar system, Planet X in the popular press, called
Nibiru by the
Sumerians, colonizing Earth some 432,000 years ago. They
subsequently genetically engineered our species, 200,000 years ago,
originally as slave animals to work in their gold mines, by crossing
their own genes with those of Homo Erectus. We became subservient
partners with them and, eventually, they phased off the planet
leaving our species on our own.
Before one rejects this thesis out of hand, it is well to understand
that it is backed up by highly coherent, well researched, well
developed archaeological data, documents, history and some two
million items of recovered artifacts. A key factor is our having
reached a level of technological advancement which allows us to
understand high science and technologies present in the past which,
until only very recently, could only seem fantastic – particularly
genetic engineering. As is the case with scientists in general,
archaeologists can adjust to internal and incidental shifts in their
consensual context but, when the paradigm itself is threatened with
replacement, there inevitably occurs a great deal of very
unscientific chest drumming and incisor display. Obviously, the
obstacle here is the word “alien”. Consider that the cardinal reason
why the alien topic has been considered the fringe “belief” of
unbalanced personalities for so long has been the relentless
promotion of that idea by the government for half a century. The
Brookings Institution (think tank) study (early ‘50’s, commissioned
by the government) concluded that,
'revelation of the
alien presence
would cause serious disruption in the fundamentalist religions and
society and recommended against.'
But extra-solar system aliens are
not our focus here.
The Anunnaki, as depicted in hundreds of carvings, reliefs,
drawings, and descriptions in the recovered documents, are quite
like us, male and female, generally taller and huskier than humans
in those times, from within our solar system, at home in our
atmosphere, radically different than the alien types allegedly from
other solar systems. If we are half Anunnaki, that should not be so
surprising. At the time they were on the planet, they apparently
possessed only ballistic rocketry for interplanetary travel, no
anti-gravitic technology yet developed.
Objections To This Thesis
Those trained in the sciences, accustomed to carefully crafted
protocols and rigorous proof will, no doubt, question this paradigm
in several ways.
Quite reasonably, it may be asked why the Sitchin paradigm has not
been embraced by the geneticists’ academic counterparts in
archaeology, anthropology, and paleontology if the evidence is as
voluminous and robust as claimed. It may also be asked, Why has this
not been the known and taught history of our kind through all the
millennium, why should there have been suppression and perversion of
this knowledge? These questions are best answered in historical
context and perspective.
There was literally no such thing as the discipline known as
Archaeology in Western culture until the 1800’s. The
Roman Church controlled and determined the view of the past. The scholastic
world, dominated by the Church, followed docilely. Not until paleontological findings of millions of years forced that view to be
reevaluated and Schliemann, a wealthy German merchant, refusing to
believe that the ancient cities and peoples were legend, dug up
several stages of the city of Troy, was a window into the past
opened and the mythic view questioned. Scientific Archaeology, as we
know it, came into existence only when academics reluctantly had to
acknowledge the past being dug up and collected by amateurs in the
Middle East. Archaeologists promptly came to be mistrusted and hated
by the religious institutions who feared revelations that would
contradict their teachings and the history of the Old Testament.
Most in the scientific world are familiar with the scientist,
Galileo, having to capitulate to the Inquisition to save his own
life, dying while under house arrest for holding to a heliocentric
view of the solar system, claiming to see planets through his
telescope. Fewer are aware of the fact that the monk, Giordano Bruno,
was burnt at the stake in Rome, through the solicitousness of the
Roman Church, only thirty six years before the founding of Harvard
University, for holding to the Copernican view and claiming that
there had to be other planets and other civilizations in the cosmos.
No one in America, literally, had a Doctorate, at the time of the
founding of Harvard University, in 1636 by John Harvard. Increase
Mather, a president of Harvard, as a Dissenter, was ineligible for a
Doctorate from any English university because all of them were
controlled by the Church. Fourteen years after the founding of
Harvard, Bishop James Uusher published his “Annales Vertis et Novi
Testamenti” dating the beginning of the world at 4004 B.C. One could
be condemned as a heretic for contraverting this doctrine by decree
of the Church in 1654 and the stricture was not removed until 1952
(!) by Pope Pius XII. The arithmetical wonder of this fact is that
was only 48 years ago. Consider that almost everything written in
this paper would have been branded as “heresy” and who knows how
DNA research would have been branded only a short time ago.
As late as 1906, the Egyptian Exploration Fund, whose charter stated
it was set up to promote archaeologists whose work would reinforce
the Old and New Testament, refused to publish the discovery of an
Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mount Horeb in the
Sinai by Sir
Flinders Petrie, the most distinguished in his field at the time.
When he published privately they pulled his funding, had the book
expunged from the publisher’s records and the British Library
never
cataloged the work --- on one of the most important discoveries in archaeology. (Sir Laurence Gardner:
Bloodline Of The Holy Grail,
Genesis Of the Grail Kings )
The mythic interpretation has been promulgated by religions because
to recognize the Anunnaki as real would be to open the door to a
radical reinterpretation of the entire phenomenon of religion and
put into question the real identity of the very deity at center of
their belief system. To relegate all the Anunnaki “gods” and their
deeds --- except Enlil/Jehovah/Yahweh, the God of the
Judeo-Christian religions, who was sublimated out of that category
--- to fictional, mythic, unreal status was supremely effective to
this end. It is through this millenniums-old tradition of
suppression, mythization and manipulative control that the
character, content and interpretation in the academic arena has been
set and remains, largely, even to this day. Very few are going to
make a rubber burning one-eighty over their Ph.D. thesis in
Mythology.
In Archaeology,
Anthropology, and Paleontology, tenure
tetanus prevents most from “going first” to admit they have been
wrong in a turn as significant and profoundly revolutionary, perhaps
even more so, than the Darwinian shock. Collegiate colitis is all
too frequent just from contemplating having to contradict oneself in
front of students. Peer pressure finishes off all but the isolated
courageous academic or scientist here and there. Thomas Kuhn (The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions) is proven correct again. If you
want that Ph.D. diploma you will repeat what you know you are
supposed to believe and say. If you want that job, that funding...
The reason becomes apparent why the academic arena has attempted to
ignore this forbidden archaeology and anthropology, and why a few
more ruthless of the academic power elite have tried to get Sitchin
quick and nasty ad hominem just outside the fact forum.
To this day, Anglican clergy still sit on the boards of English
universities. In America, the Constitution is only a negative
restraint on religious authoritarian domination. Our schools of
higher “learning” still parade the trappings of the medieval
university on ceremonial occasions and, unfortunately, all too often
still in their limitation of discussion to approved subjects. That
the influence of religion on science is still virulent is manifest
in the deference shown by politicians to religionists in decisions
in matters of genetic research.
The ordinary scientist, although perhaps open and cognizant of the
serious scientific objections that have been raised against classic
Darwinian theory, is reluctant to question or reassess the
evolutionary paradigm because of the erroneous fear that creationism
would be the only alternative. In effect, the acceptance of the new
paradigm is more difficult because it supersedes and corrects both
the creationist and the Darwinian models. The
Creationists were only
half wrong and the Evolutionists only half right: there was a
creation event but it was a genetic engineering process; there is an
evolutionary process but it was not linear from the time the
lightning hit the mud to us as the pinnacle of creation. It was
interrupted in our regard by the Anunnaki for their own practical
purposes. We shall be compelled to introduce an additional category:
a genetically synthesized species.( And, if a voice out there is
heard to say "Well, thank God for Darwin regardless of how imperfect
his work was.." many of us will still not catch the irony in that
statement....)
In our time, the position of the genetic specialist can become quite
personally disconcerting. Having been trained as an undergraduate to
uncritically accept some variation on the Darwinian evolutionary
theme, tending to look to fellow scientists, particularly the
archaeologists, biologists, and anthropologists for answers to the
“big” questions, conditioned, if only subliminally, by religio-cultural
tradition, the geneticist finds it difficult enough to decipher the
genome much less consider a radically revolutionary paradigm forcing
a complete rethinking of the planet. The purpose of this paper is to
respectfully facilitate just that process for the geneticist because
the new paradigm contains vital clues and vectors directly related
to the geneticist’s quest.
The Demise of the Mythological Explanation of the Gods
Those still holding the mythological interpretation are in an
unenviable position. They find themselves having to hold that the
same citizens of the first civilizations who, they claim, invented
-- or hallucinated -- the gods through their primitive imaginings
and naive proto-scientific projections of personality on the great
forces of nature were the same primitives who somehow could build
the stupendous
Giza pyramid; somehow quarry, cut and move into place
the one thousand ton stones of the
Baalbek “temple” (rocket
platform) which even our modern technology cannot begin to lift;
somehow know the great precessional cycle of the heavens, the
existence of all ten of the planets of our solar system and how our
solar system was formed (Enuma Elish document).
The physical locations of the ancient legends as mythic has been
gradually disproven beginning with the work of Schliemann and
completed with the re-discovery of all the ancient cities and
centers on all continents.
The events involving the “gods” of ancient times and the technology
attributed to them, previously considered as myth and naive legend,
have been gradually proven to be real, beginning with the discovery
of documents from the most ancient cities and reinforced with the
discovery of the great library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh and the
gradual accumulation of some two million pieces of artifact and
document confirming those events in great detail. The discovery of
ooparts, (high tech tools, toys, artifacts, and technology along
with documentation of advanced scientific knowledge ostensibly out
of place in time) along with astronomical knowledge of the entire
solar system beyond our current level has reinforced the negation of
the mythic interpretation.
The interpretation of the “gods”, the Anunnaki themselves, as
mythic, unreal beings (academic mythologists) and Jungian archetypes
(Joseph Campbell) and the relegation of them to schizophrenic
hallucination (Julian Jaynes) has been gradually disproven beginning
with the acknowledgment of the reality of the events attributed to
them; the discounting of the arguments for their unreality due to
the seeming fantastic deeds attributed to them by the development of
our technology (rockets, lasers, radio communication, genetic
engineering, atomic and particle beam weapons) that duplicate those
feats. This interpretation has been implemented further by the
exploration and questions posed early by the German school, pioneers
like von Daniken and then completed by the comprehensive and
brilliant demonstrations of
Sitchin and
Sir Laurence Gardner, the
English historian and genealogist.
Now that we have begun by walking on the moon and exploring the
solar system and have probes going starward, the possibility of an alien civilization coming here
is taken for granted and one coming
here from inside our solar system trivial, rather than unreal myth.
“Mythinformation”, after two hundred years of failure, although
still hiding behind tenure in the university, is a dead issue.
The Essence of the Sitchin Paradigm
Working from the same archaeological discoveries, artifacts, and
recovered records as archaeologists and linguists have for two
hundred years, Sitchin propounds – proves, in the opinion of this
author --that the Anunnaki (Sumerian: “those who came down from the
heavens”; Old testament Hebrew, Anakeim, Nefilim, Elohim;
Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar
system, splashed down in the Persian gulf area around 432,000 years
ago, colonized the planet, with the purpose of obtaining large
quantities of gold. Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered documents
tell us, their lower echelon miners rebelled against the conditions
in the mines and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a
creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist and
Ninhursag their chief medical officer, after getting no satisfactory
results splicing animal and Homo Erectus genes, merged their
Anunnaki genes with that of Homo Erectus and produced us,
Homo
Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species, for their purposes as
slaves. Because we were a hybrid we could not procreate. The demand
for us as workers became greater and we were genetically manipulated
to reproduce.
Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were expelled from
the Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading over the planet.
Having become a stable genetic stock and developing more
precociously than, perhaps, the Anunnaki had anticipated, the
Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as sexual partners and
children were born of these unions. This was unacceptable to the
majority of the Anunnaki high council and it was decided to
wipe out
the human population through a flood that was predictable when
Nibiru, the tenth in our solar system and the Anunnaki home planet,
came through the inner solar system again (around 12,500 years ago)
on one of its periodic 3600 year returns. Some humans were saved by
the action of the Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to
the humans he had originally genetically created. For thousands of
years we were their slaves, their workers, their servants, their
soldiers in their political battles among themselves. The Anunnaki
used us in the construction of their palaces (we retroproject the
religious notion of temple on these now), their cities, their mining
and refining complexes and their astronomical installations on all
the continents. They expanded from Mesopotamia to
Egypt to India to
South and Central America and the stamp of their presence can be
found in the farthest reaches of the planet.
Around 6000 years ago they, probably realizing that they were going
to phase off the planet, began to gradually bring humans to
independence. Sumer, a human civilization, amazing in its “sudden”
and mature and highly advanced character was set up under their
tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human kings were inaugurated as
go-betweens, foremen of the human populations answering to the
Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically enhanced with more
Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a tradition of “servants of
the people” was initiated (Gardner). These designated humans were
taught technology, mathematics, astronomy, advanced crafts and the
ways of advanced civilized society (in schools, called now “mystery
schools” but there was no mystery about them). Gardner has brought
to light the fact that there exists a robust, highly documented,
genealogical, genetic history carrying all the way back to the
Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of Christianity,
which is only now coming forward, no longer gun-shy of the
Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the bloodline, is the one
branded “heretical” and murderously persecuted by
the Roman Church.
There were no Dark Ages for this tradition, only for those whom the
Church wanted to keep in the dark about the real nature of human
history and destroy the bloodline, a direct threat to the power of
the Bishops.
The Anunnaki became somewhat more remote from humans. By
around 1250
B.C. they had gone into their final phase-out mode. The human
population and the foremen kings, now left on their own began to
fend for themselves. For some three thousand years, subsequently, we
humans have been going through a traumatic transition to racial
independence. Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as
to who knew what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return or
when they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals
learned under the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and strife
broke out between them. Religion, as we know it, took form, focused
on the “god” or “gods”, clearly and unambiguously known to the
humans who were in contact with them as imperfect, flesh and blood
humanoids, now absent. It was only much later that the Anunnaki were
eventually sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later
on, conveniently mythologized. We have been dysfunctionally looking
to the sky where they went, waiting for Daddy to return to make
everything right and tell us what to do for some three thousand
years caught in cargo cult religions.
Go Back
The Astronomical Evidence
A key underpinning of the Sitchin paradigm is the existence, now or
in the past, of the tenth planet in our solar system, the home
planet of the Anunnaki with the size, orbit, and characteristics
described, as Sitchin has demonstrated, in the
Enuma Elish and
corroborated by Harrington, former chief of the U.S. Naval
Observatory, now deceased.
Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S. Naval
Observatory, discovered Charon, Pluto’s moon, in 1978. The
characteristics of Pluto derivable from the nature of Charon
demonstrated that there must still be a large planet undiscovered
because Pluto could not be the cause of the residuals, the “wobbles”
in the orbital paths of Uranus and Neptune clearly identifiable. The
IRAS (Infrared Astronomical Satellite), during ’83 -’84, produced
observations of a tenth planet so robust that one of the astronomers
on the project said that “all that remains is to name it” -- from
which point the information has become curiously guarded. In 1992
Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working with
all the information they had at hand, published their findings and
opinion that there is, indeed, a tenth planet, even calling it an
“intruder” planet. The search was narrowed to the southern skies,
below the ecliptic. Harrington invited Sitchin, having read his book
and translations of the Enuma Elish, to a meeting at his office and
they correlated the current findings with the ancient records.
The recovered Enuma Elish document, a history of the formation of
our solar system and more, says that, at the time when
Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus and Saturn were in place, there was a
Uranus sized planet, called Tiamat, in orbit between
Mars and
Jupiter. Earth was not in place yet. A large wandering planet,
called
Nibiru, was captured into the system gravitationally. As it
passed by the outer planets it caused the anomalies of their moons,
the tilting of Uranus on its side, the dislodging of
Pluto from its
being a moon of Saturn to its own planetary orbit. Its path bent by
the gravitational pull of the large planets, first its satellites
collided with the large planet Tiamat and, on a second orbit
through, Nibiru collided with Tiamat, driving the larger part of it
into what is now Earth’s orbit to recongeal as Earth, dragging its
moon with it to become our Moon with all its anomalies. The
shattered debris of Tiamat’s smaller part became the
asteroid belt,
comets, and meteorites. The gouge of our Pacific basin is awesome
testimony to the collisional event. Nibiru settled into a 3600 year
elliptical retrograde (opposite direction to all the other planets)
orbit around our sun, coming in through the asteroid belt region
between Mars and Jupiter at perigee and swinging far out past
Pluto
at apogee. Dr.
Robert Harrington acknowledged that his information agreed with
all these details and the maps they each had drawn of the orbits
were almost indistinguishable. The current probable location of
Nibiru (Planet X, our tenth) estimated by both was the same.
The Technological Evidence
Ooparts is the term used to describe the purportedly out of place in
time artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices, depictions and
documents which have come to light through archaeological excavation
or discovery. Almost everyone is familiar, through published works
or documentaries, with the clay pot batteries still containing the
electrodes from the Iraqi desert dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable
model airplane from a pyramid tomb, the sophisticated machining of
stone requiring the most advanced techniques we know today, the 1000
ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple foundation that we
could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an Abydos
temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a helicopter, etc. The
most recent and quite amazing oopart is the rediscovery of
monoatomic gold by David Hudson (Monoatomics are superconductors at
room temperature, have anti-gravitic properties and are only now
being investigated by the advanced physics community)
Hudson’s
discovery, correlated with the bringing to light, by Gardner, of the
suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold processing plant on
Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates that the monoatomics were already known at least 3000 years ago. These
ooparts coupled with evidence from many disciplines and the
historical records indicate that an advanced civilization existed in
those times possessing a high technology and that that civilization
was indeed the Anunnaki.
The Documentary Evidence
The recorded historical documentation for the existence and deeds of
the Anunnaki has become gradually available to us only since the
early 1800’s. The excavation of the ancient sites of Mesopotamia
brought to light the amazingly advanced civilization of Sumer and,
with it, thousands of clay tablets containing not only mundane
records of commerce, marriages, military actions and advanced
astronomical calculation systems but of the history of the Anunnaki
themselves. It is clear from these records that the Sumerians knew
these aliens to be real flesh and blood.
The library of the ruler,
Ashurbanipal, at Nineveh was discovered to have burnt down and the
clay tablets held there were fired, preserving them for our reading.
One of the most impressive finds, in very recent time, has been a
sealed, nine foot by six foot room in Sippar holding, neatly
arranged on shelves, a set of some 400 elaborate clay tablets
containing an unbroken record of the history of those ancient times,
a sort of time capsule. The evidence is so overwhelming and robust
that, if it weren’t for those with power enough to suppress, it
would have been accepted and our world view changed a century ago
or, perhaps, sooner.
The Genetic Evidence
The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki laboratory
where the first humans were literally produced in east central
Africa just above their gold mines. This falls precisely on the map
where the mitochondrial DNA “search for Eve” places the
first woman
Homo-Sapiens and in the same time frame. (The gold mining engineers
of Africa have found 100,000 year old gold mines in that area.) The
evidence for, and description of advanced genetic engineering is all
there in the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to
going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years, does not correspond to
the million year periodicities of slow evolutionary development of
other species such as Homo Erectus before us. As so many thinkers
have pointed out, we are radically and anomalously different, as
discussed in part 3.
Two Definitive Protocols for Proving or Disproving the Sitchin
Paradigm
A straightforward approach to prove or disprove the Sitchin paradigm
is available from astronomy. A thorough, professional search of our
solar system should be able, with current technology, to determine
the existence or non-existence of a tenth planet with the
characteristics of size, orbit, orbital periodicity, and declination
from the ecliptic, as Sitchin has determined from the translations
of the ancient records and particularly the
Enuma Elish document. If
that planet is not in our solar system or no evidence can be found
for an ejection or cataclysmic destructive event then the Sitchin
paradigm falls. This search should be undertaken with highest
priority. The matter is sufficiently important to clearing up our
historical situation that the academic world should be involved as
well as the scientific community. It is the opinion of this author
and others that, in light of the evidence already obtained through
the use of the Pioneer 10 and 11 and two Voyager space craft, the
Infrared Imaging Satellite (IRAS, ‘83-84) and the clear and
unequivocal statements of Harrington when consulting with Sitchin,
that the search has already been accomplished, in fact that the
planet has already been found.
A second mode of proof or disproof is available through genetics. We
will shortly have the entire human genome read out and its details
sorted. That process, and the information available as a result,
should afford us the opportunity to examine the entire genome for
the evidence of the merging of the two species’ gene codes, Homo
Erectus and Anunnaki, a definitive way to prove or disprove
Sitchin’s thesis. It is in this process, if proven, that the vital
clues to the interpretation of the genome lie as examined in Part 4.
It is the position of this author that, not only will the bicameral
nature of the code eventually be recognized but valuable clues found
through the new paradigm to a profound understanding of the genome
and the human.
Go Back
The First Factor: Background of Conditioning to Subservience
The overwhelming evidence from the Sitchin paradigm demonstrates
conclusively that we were genetically engineered by the Anunnaki and
treated as slaves and then limited partners but always as
subservient to them. The major ramification (Neil Freer: Breaking
the Godspell) of the Sitchin explication is that “religion”, as we
have known it, is the transmutation, sublimation of the
Anunnaki-human relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery
and then limited, subservient partnership. Since then, we have been
going through phases of a traumatic transition to species maturity
and independence.
The major characteristic of this process has been
the transmutation in all cultures of them, in particular Enlil/Jehovah
in Western culture, into a cosmic deity, commonly called “God” in
the Judeo-Christian tradition. (Is this atheism? No, not as such. It
simply is a long overdue correction of some local, intra-solar
system politics, relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective.
Garden variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of
precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the
authority of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of the
particular local Nefilim "god" of the Hebrew tribe and Christianity,
Yahweh/Jehovah. The new paradigm, once the ancient, subservient
godspell is dispelled, simply frees us to go one on one with the
universe as our own evolutionary artists and to seek directly
whatever unthinkable or thinkable ultimate principle is behind it.)
In a later phase we have mythologized them into unreal beings and
then, more “sophisticatedly” into psychological archetypes. Only
with cumulative evidence, our own evolved technology and restored
history through modern scholarship have we now been enabled to grasp
the true nature of our genetic creation, our godspell conditioning,
traumatic transition, and the opportunity to emerge from species
adolescence and amnesia into species maturity. E.O. Wilson, the
father of Sociobiology, while rejecting religion as mythology, also
sees it as hardwired in the brain as a result of millennia of
genetic evolutionary programming. His opinion takes on a whole new
meaning in the context of the new paradigm: his description of this
predisposition of the human neurological system is an excellent
definition of the genetically engineered human displaying the godspell mentality.
The Second Factor: The Babel Factor, The Splintering of the Human
Race Into Hostile Religions
So, down to our day, incredibly, we have remained still
Babel-factored for good crowd control, broken into tribes each
proprietarily telling the other that ours is the only accurate
tradition of what some particular “god” intended, what rules to
follow, what we should be doing to demonstrate we are still loyal
and docile servants. Sometimes we just kill each other over it. And
persecutions, Crusades, Jihads, Inquisitions, evil empires, the
saved and the damned, the martyr, the infidel, the saint, the
Protestant, the fundamentalist, the atheist, became -- and remain.
The Third Factor: A Tradition of Absolutism, Suppression and
Repression
Modern scholarship, working on foundations laid as far back as the
German school, has reassessed the Old Testament. When the
Mesopotamian records began to be unearthed in the 1800’s, it was
realized that the history revealed from 4000 B.C. forward, was the
source of the history of the Old Testament. The Jews, allowed to be
confined to captivity by the Babylonians by their “god”
Jehovah, had
drawn on that history and committed forgery (Sitchin) by rewriting
it to their need to establish Enlil/Jehovah as their supreme ruler.
That history shows clearly that two Anunnaki brothers, Enlil and
Enki had always been at odds with each other personally and
politically. Enki was the Anunnaki scientist who, together with his
half-sister scientist, Ninhursag, had created humans and had always
been favorable to them. Enlil had always had reservations about
humans and dominated them with severity.
Gardner has made the case that when the Old Testament referred to
The Lord (Adonai, Enki) it was when good things were being done to
or for the Hebrews. When terrible things were being done or allowed
to happen to them, the reference was always to Jehovah (Yahweh,
Enlil)
and it was to Enlil’s dominance that they finally capitulated and
whom they worshipped in fear. The bloodline of human leaders,
further enhanced with Anunnaki genes, initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from
Sumer through Egypt to Israel through
David and
the messiahs (anointed ones), fostered by the Essene communities as
revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. It was recognized but treated
ambiguously by the large faction of the Hebrews who paid allegiance
to Enlil.
The strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism (Jesus was in the
bloodline) eventually became known as heterodox Christian was
opposed by the Pauline branch which eventually allied itself with
Rome and became the
Roman Church. The orthodox Roman Church
perpetuated the Enlil type fear and subservience tradition and, in
its turn, suppressed, persecuted and brutalized the human-centered
strain of the bloodline.. The reason why women have always been
denigrated and suppressed by the Roman Church is genetic: the
bloodline was dependent on transmission through the women of the
line and any recognition of them would be recognition of the line.
It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of this
vital block of information about the genome due to the preclusive
attitude of the “bishops” still reigning in archaeology. The
restoration of our true human history clearly affords resolution to
the perennial Creationist-Evolutionary as well as other conflicts
and will lead to a consensual, generic definition of a human and a
planetary unity never before experienced. By that release, it also
reveals clues to our current genetic questions. These are best
approached through the answers to the most obvious objections that
have been raised to the new paradigm.
Scientific Objections to the Thesis
How could the Anunnaki, clearly described as comfortable in earth
gravity and atmosphere, very similar to current humans in all ways,
have evolved on a planet within our solar system whose orbital
apogee takes it into the deep cold of space for much of its orbit?
The ancient records repeatedly describe Nibiru as a “radiant”
planet. This may be understood as having a high core temperature.
Although controversial, there is also astrophysical opinion that a
large body in elongated orbit is constantly tending toward circular
orbit and this causes stresses in the body that could generate a
good deal of heat. That their planet is gradually cooling, may be
indicated by Sitchin’s interpretation of their colonizing Earth
(contains most of the gold identifiable in the solar system) for the
purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold for molecular seeding
of their atmosphere with a reflective gold shielding. Pertinent here
is Harrington’s confident statement to Sitchin that it is “a nice,
good planet, could be surrounded by gases, probably has an
atmosphere and could support life like ours”. The sunlight level
there might be quite different than on earth. Although not always,
the Anunnaki were often depicted or sculpted with what seem to be
obviously sunglasses.
If, however, the Anunnaki evolved on a radically different planet
from earth under quite different conditions to which to adapt, why
should they have turned out to be so identical to to human species?
Sitchin’s answer is based on the collisional event between the
intruder planet, Nibiru, and the planet Tiamat, the residual part of
which recongealed into the Earth after being driven into current
Earth orbit. That the two, or at least one, of the colliding planets
was sufficiently developed to have evolved basic organic compounds,
perhaps even simple life, the cross-seeding of everything from amino
acids to more complicated organic compounds or even primitive
organisms, could account for the evolutionary similarity. Although
this author finds it a reasonable hypothesis, even trivial, that
advanced civilizations would be capable of crossing extremely
different genomes, perhaps with even radically different bases, the
cross-seeding theory can account for the apparent relative ease with
which the Anunnaki impinged their genes on the genes of Homo
Erectus. The Anunnaki skill level, 200,000 years ago, is indicated
well by the recorded fact that, in early trials, they succeeded in
crossing animal genes with Homo Erectus genes, obtained living
hybrids but never a satisfactory product which led them to modify
Homo Erectus genes with their advanced genes.
This provides a comprehensive context in which to understand and
explain the enigmatic facts of our being contemporaneous with
Neanderthals or even preceding them and other anthropological
anomalies --- at least within the Darwinian model -- of our species
existence. We have 46 chromosomes, primates have 48 and the fusion
of the second and third chromosomes in primates is a mystery. Even
today the anthropological sector is scrambling to find a viable
ancestor species for us, Homo Erectus is currently being promoted;
we showed up too suddenly in the chronology of the fossil record;
our 4000 plus genetic diseases are a total enigma.
We present with very many startling, obvious differences from
primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our species,
are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow ridges, eye sockets
far more rectangular than round; relatively tiny nasal passages;
small flat mouths and a chin; far less muscular strength and bone
density; our skin, sweat process and glands, body hair, throats, and
salt management are completely different. Human females don’t have
an estrus cycle. We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different
to say the very least.
If our genome is estimated as 95% to 98% similar to the chimpanzee,
how could there be a melding of the Homo Erectus and
Anunnaki
genomes, or impingement of the advanced code on the lesser advanced
one detectable? The author suggests that this is a major question
probably answerable only by the geneticists open-minded enough to
attack it. The resolution of that question should provide rich
additional clues in itself.
Go Back
If it is taken as archaeologically and historically demonstrated
that we are a genetically engineered, bicameral species, the product
of genetically melding two racial genomes, the past becomes a rich
archive of anthropological, technical, historical and especially
genetic information and data. Just as the reluctant acknowledgement
that ancient records from the Sumerian or Chinese civilizations
contained accurate astronomical observations and data opened up a
valuable resource to modern astronomers, so the history of our
species’ genetic creation in a laboratory pinpointed on the map of
east central Africa precisely where the mitochondrial “search for
Eve” locates the first human female(s), opens an astounding resource
to modern geneticists.
The most important advantage is that, enabled with this knowledge
and perspective, geneticists can begin to understand and decipher
and interpret our genome with the tremendous advantage of working
within a robust context providing major clues as to what to look for
and where to look and why.
The ancient records of why, when, and how we were genetically
engineered make it abundantly clear that we were brought into
existence as a subordinate species, a slave species to relieve the
Anunnaki miner echelons. (The essential, detailed documentation
through translations and illustrations of the actual genetic
processes (in vitro; cloning, etc. ) used by the Anunnaki is found
in Sitchin, The Twelfth Planet, chapter 12) It is specified
pointedly that, although the Anunnaki lived, literally, extended
lifetimes of thousands of our years (either because of the way they
themselves had evolved on their home planet or, perhaps, because of
their genetic engineering capabilities to achieve that longevity,
and possibly through their use of the monoatomic form of gold) they
deliberately did not bestow that potential on us. In fact, it is
mentioned clearly that they deliberately withheld it. This
deliberate withholding of immortality and, perhaps, even a
shortening of longevity, may provide a major clue to our aging
process and mortality. (Sociologically, this is the reason why
immortality, in one form or another, has become the sublimated
reward for a good life in all the religions.). From the details
given in the ancient records, it is conceivable that some
engineering of the process was executed deliberately to suppress
certain characteristics to make better and docile slaves.
If they were interested only in engineering what clearly amounted to
disposable units then it may reasonably be inferred that the quality
and completeness of the engineering would not have to have been
taken to the maximum. This is, in the opinion of this author, the
basis for the four thousand plus genetic diseases and defects we
present. It has been argued theoretically that, although the vast
majority of the species on this planet present with only a few
typical genetic diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative
complexity of our organism. But we are not that much more complex
genetically than even the higher primates and this argument does not
hold.
Several significant details in the records of our genetic genesis
may hold clues. It is recounted that two kinds of females were
created, those who would bear children and those who would not.
Determining genetically how we, as sterile mutants when first
created, were manipulated to be able to procreate may be a major
lead. Finally, knowing that an advanced bloodline of humans,
enhanced by additional Anunnaki genes, was created around 4000 B.C.
is even more valuable a clue since that bloodline has been carefully
nurtured and protected through to our day and, therefore, available
for investigation and analysis and comparison.
A primary practical tool would be the devising of a protocol through
which a crossing of the two gene codes might be recognized. The
ancient records could be interpreted to mean either a complete
melding of the two codes or, alternatively, the impingement of
selected Anunnaki genes on the Homo Erectus code to tweak up the
more primitive code to at least a condition of intelligence and
physical competence to handle the mining of gold. It is possible
that in some 200,000 years of our existence the accommodation
between the codes has smoothed and recognition may be difficult
indeed. The obtaining of some robust Homo Erectus DNA samples from
fossils would be a great help. It may evolve that, in working on the
genetic diseases from the perspective of the genome being bicameral,
those defects may yield an indirect key in some pattern or mechanism
that indicates the nature and extent of the splicing of the codes.
During the genetic investigation now in process, therefore, it would
be valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to be constantly
inspecting the results of the decipherment for signs of the genetic
merging, and to develop protocols to determine such, if needed, as
well as following the clues mentioned herein. By doing so,
interpretations and explanations may possibly be facilitated,
progress accelerated and a far more comprehensive overview of the
genome achieved. The information gained would, reciprocally, be a
major, pivotal, invaluable resultant spin-off contribution to our
species’ evolutionary, anthropological, and cultural generic
history.
Go Back
Selected Reading
-
Freer, Neil,
Breaking the Godspell (New Falcon Publications, ’87,
‘90’, ’93, ‘99)
God Games: What Do You Do Forever? (The Book Tree, ’98, ‘99)
-
Gardner, Sir Laurence,
Bloodline of the Holy Grail (Element Books,
’96)
Genesis of the Grail Kings (Bantam Press, ’99)
-
Sitchin, Zecharia,
The Twelfth Planet
The Stairway to Heaven
The Wars of Gods and Men
The Lost Realms
When Time Began
Genesis Revisited
(All Bear & Co. Hardback or Avon Paperback, ‘76-)
-
Recommended reading order:
Go Back
|