3.1 ATLANTEAN SECRETS REVISITED
As illustrated in our previous volume, a majority of the unified
cosmological picture that we have been describing in this book is provided
in exquisite detail throughout the Vedic scriptures, which date themselves
as being 18,000 years old. It is highly likely that the entire cosmology
that we are discussing was well known by both the Atlanteans and
the Ramans
during ancient times. Then, roughly 12,000 years ago, a worldwide cataclysm
caused the destruction of both civilizations. As the years passed, those who
inherited the scientific knowledge would have more and more difficulty
seeing “the big picture.”
Almost all sacred traditions, including those of the Vedas, insisted that
there was a hidden order that unified all aspects of the Universe, and that
with sufficient study and visualization of the underlying geometric forms of
this order, the mind of the Initiate could be connected with the Oneness of
the Universe, enabling great feats of consciousness and mind-over-matter
capability to occur. Some of these visualizations took the form of studying
mandalas, such as the
Sri Yantra formation. Others preferred to engage in
dances where the movements and music were in tune with these geometric
patterns. Still others preferred to assemble, sculpt and / or draw these
forms with a compass and straightedge, hence the importance of the main
symbol of the Masonic fraternity, which has the letter “G”, symbolizing
“God,” “Geometry” and the “Great Architect of the Universe,” surrounded by a
compass above it and a straightedge below it. Pre-Masonic groups such as the
Knight Templars chose to encode these geometric relationships into their
sacred structures, such as the stained-glass windows in cathedrals.
3.2 SACRED GEOMETRY AND THE PLATONIC SOLIDS
Hence, the cornerstone of knowledge for secret mystery schools regarding
this hidden order in the Universe has always been
sacred geometry. We have
written extensively on this subject in both of our previous books, and the
reader is encouraged to refer back to them for greater understanding. In
short, sacred geometry is simply another form of vibration, or “crystallized
music.” Consider the following example:
First, we vibrate a guitar string. This creates “standing waves,” meaning
waves that do not move back and forth across the string but remain stable in
one place. We will see some areas where there is an extreme of vertical
movement, representing the top and bottom of the wave, and other areas where
there is no vertical movement, known as nodes. The nodes that are formed in
any type of standing wave will always be spaced evenly apart from each
other, and the speed of the vibration will determine how many nodes will
appear. This means that the higher the vibration rises, the more nodes we
will see.
In two dimensions, we can either use an oscilloscope or vibrate a flat
circular “Chladni plate” and see nodes develop that will form common
geometric forms such as the square, triangle and hexagon when connected
together. This work has been repeated many times by Dr. Hans Jenny,
Gerald
Hawkins and others.
- If the circle has three equally spaced
nodes, then they can connect to form a triangle - If the circle
has four equally spaced nodes, it can form a square - If it has
five nodes, it forms a pentagon - Six nodes form a hexagon, et cetera
Though this is a very simple concept in terms of wave mechanics, Gerald
Hawkins was the first to establish mathematically that such geometries
inscribed within circles were indeed musical relationships. We may be
surprised to realize that he was led to this discovery by analyzing various
geometric crop formations that would appear overnight in the fields of the
British countryside. This has been covered in both of our previous volumes.
The deepest, most revered forms of sacred geometry are three-dimensional,
and are known as the Platonic solids. There are only five formations in
existence that follow all the needed rules to qualify, and these are the
eight-sided octahedron, four-sided tetrahedron, six-sided cube, twelve-sided
dodecahedron and twenty-sided icosahedron. Here, the tetrahedron is shown as
a “star tetrahedron” or interlaced tetrahedron, meaning that you have two
tetrahedra that are joined together in perfect symmetry:
Figure 3.1 – The five basic Platonic Solids.
Here are some of the main rules for these geometric solids:
- Each formation will have the same shape on every side:
-
equilateral triangle faces on the octahedron, tetrahedron and icosahedron
-
square faces on the cube
-
pentagonal faces on the dodecahedron
- Every line on each of the formations will be exactly the same length.
- Every internal angle on each of the formations will also be the same.
And most importantly,
- Each shape will fit perfectly inside of a sphere, all the points touching
the edges of the sphere with no overlaps.
Similar to the two-dimensional cases involving the triangle, square,
pentagon and hexagon inside the circle, the Platonic Solids are
simply
representations of waveforms in three dimensions. This point cannot be
stressed strongly enough. Each tip or vertex of the Platonic Solids touches
the surface of a sphere in an area where the vibrations have canceled out to
form a node. Thus, what we are seeing is a three-dimensional geometric image
of vibration / pulsation.
Both the students of Buckminster Fuller and his protégé Dr. Hans Jenny
devised clever experiments that showed how the Platonic Solids
would form
within a vibrating / pulsating sphere. In the experiment conducted by Fuller’s students, a spherical balloon was dipped in dye and pulsed with
“pure” sound frequencies, known as the “Diatonic” sound ratios. A small
number of evenly-distanced nodes would form across the surface of the
sphere, as well as thin lines that connected them to each other. If you have
four evenly spaced nodes, you will see a tetrahedron. Six evenly spaced
nodes form an octahedron. Eight evenly spaced nodes form a
cube. Twenty
evenly spaced nodes form the dodecahedron, and twelve evenly spaced nodes
form the icosahedron. The straight lines that we see on these geometric
objects simply represent the stresses that are created by the “closest
distance between two points” for each of the nodes as they distribute
themselves across the entire surface of the sphere.
Figure 3.2 – Dr. Hans Jenny’s Platonic Solid formation in spherical
vibrating fluid.
Dr. Hans Jenny conducted a similar experiment, a small part of which is
pictured here in Figure 3.2, wherein a droplet of water contained a very
fine suspension of light-colored particles, known as a “colloidal
suspension.” When this roughly spherical droplet of particle-filled water
was vibrated at various “Diatonic” musical frequencies, the
Platonic Solids
would appear inside, surrounded by elliptical curving lines that would
connect their nodes together, as we see in the picture, where it is clear
that there are two tetrahedrons in the central area. If the droplet were a
perfect sphere instead of a flattened sphere, then the formations would be
even more clearly visible.
3.3 PLATONIC SOLIDS AND “SYMMETRY” IN PHYSICS
The mystery and significance of the Platonic Solids has not been completely
lost to modern science, as these forms fit all the necessary criteria for
creating “symmetry” in physics in many different ways. For this reason, they
are often seen in theories that deal with multi-dimensionality, where many
“planes” need to intersect in symmetrical ways so that they can be rotated
in a number of ways and always remain in the same positions relative to each
other. These multi-dimensional theories include “group theory,” also known
as “gauge theory,” which consistently features various Platonic models for
“infolded” hyperdimensional space.
These same “modular functions” are considered to be the most advanced
mathematical tools available for the study and understanding of “higher
dimensions,” and the “Superstring” theory is entirely built off of them. In
short, the Platonic Solids are already known to be the master key to unlock
the world of “higher dimensions.” Remember that we have only briefly
mentioned the above points, as they have been well-addressed in our previous
volumes, and the key is symmetry. When we keep in mind the symmetrical
quality of the Solids as we have indicated, Dr. Wolff’s words from Chapter 5
entitled On the Importance of Living in Three Dimensions should make good
sense to us:
Pg. 71 – As your advisor in exploration, I can tell you, “Whenever you see a
situation of symmetry in a physical problem, stop and think! Because you
will nearly always find an easier way to solve the problem by using the
symmetry property.” This is one of the rewards of playing around with
symmetry. The ideas are neat…
In mathematics and
geometry, there is a need to be precise; so there
symmetry is defined to mean that a function or a geometric figure remains
the same, despite:
1) a rotation of coordinates,
2) movement along an axis,
or
3) an interchange of variables.
In physical science, which is our main concern, the existence of a
symmetry
usually means that a law of Nature does not change, despite:
1) a rotation
of coordinates in space,
2) movement along an axis through space,
3)
changing the past into the future such that t becomes –t,
4) an interchange
of two coordinates such as exchanging x with y, z with –z, etc. or,
5) the
change of any given variable. [emphasis added]
The Platonic Solids have the greatest geometric symmetry of any shapes in
existence, though Dr. Wolff does not call them by name here. In the next
excerpt from Dr. Aspden, he refers to the Platonic Solid
forms in the aether
as “fluid crystals,” and explains how they can have an effect similar to a
solid, even while they are appearing in a fluidlike medium:
…19th century physicists were puzzled by the
aether because it exhibits some
properties telling us it is a fluid and some telling us it is a solid. That
was the perception from a time when little if anything was known about
‘fluid crystals’. The displays in many pocket calculators use electrical
signals and rely on the properties of a substance that, like the aether,
exhibits properties characteristic of both the liquid state and the solid
state as a function of electric field disturbances. [emphasis added]
This gives us a “solid” explanation for why Tesla said that the
aether
“behaves as a liquid for matter, and as a solid for light and heat". The
Platonic Solids actually do act as if they were structural frameworks within
the aether, organizing the energy flows into specific patterns.
Hence, the Platonic Solids are the simple geometric forms of “crystallized
music” that will naturally form themselves in the aether when it pulsates.
Another important point to remember is that as the hierarchy of Platonic
Solids “grow” into each other, the movement will always occur along spiral
pathways, predominantly rooted in the classic “phi” ratio.
Torsion waves
have been seen to follow the “phi” pattern as well, which shall be more
fully explored when we discuss the under-appreciated “pyramid power”
phenomenon and the “cavity structural effect” pioneered by Dr. Victor Grebennikov in Chapter Seven.
3.4 MICROCLUSTER PHYSICS
Just as we were finishing up the first half of this book, a new associate
alerted us to the burgeoning new field of “microcluster physics,” which
changes our entire view of the quantum world by presenting us with a whole
new phase of matter that does not obey the conventionally accepted “rules.”
Microclusters are tiny “particles” that present clear and straightforward
evidence that atoms are vortexes in the aether that naturally assemble into
Platonic Solid formations by their vibration / pulsation. Furthermore, these
new discoveries pose quite a challenge for those who still believe that
there must be single electrons orbiting a nucleus instead of standing-wave
electron clouds of aetheric energy that assemble into geometric patterns.
The story of “microclusters” first broke into the mainstream world in the
December 1989 issue of Scientific American, in an article by Michael A.
Duncan and Dennis H. Rouvray:
Divide and subdivide a solid and the traits of its solidity fade away one by
one, like the features of the Cheshire Cat, to be replaced by
characteristics that are not those of liquids or gases. They belong instead
to a new phase of matter, the micro cluster… They pose questions that lie at
the heart of solid-state physics and chemistry, and the related field of
material science. How small must an aggregate of particles become before the
character of the substance they once formed is lost? How might the atoms
reconfigure if freed from the influence of the matter that surrounds them?
If the substance is a metal, how small must this cluster of atoms be to
avoid the characteristic sharing of free electrons that underlies
conductivity? [emphasis added]
Less than two years after this story broke in the mainstream, the science of microcluster physics was realized in its own graduate-school textbook
authored by Satoru Sugano and Hiroyasu Koizumi. Microcluster Physics was
published by the respectable, mainstream Springer-Verlag corporation as
volume 21 in a series of texts in the field of materials science. All of the
quotes from this text that we shall use are from its revised second edition,
which was released in 1998. In Sugano and Koizumi’s text, we are told that
with the new discoveries of microclusters, we can now arrange groupings of
atoms into four basic categories of size, each with different properties:
- Molecules: 1-10 atoms - Microclusters:
10-1000 atoms - Fine Particles: 1000-100,000 atoms - Bulk: 100,000+ atoms
When we study the above list, we would initially expect that microclusters
would have traits in common with molecules and with fine particles both, but
in fact they have properties that neither display, as Sugano et al. explain
here:
Microclusters consisting of 10 to 10^3 atoms exhibit neither the properties
of the corresponding bulk nor those of the corresponding molecule of a few
atoms. The microclusters may be considered to form a new phase of materials
lying between macroscopic solids and microscopic particles such as atoms and
molecules, showing both macroscopic and microscopic features. However,
research into such a new phase has been left untouched until recent years by
the development of the quantum theory of matter. [emphasis added]
As we continue reading, we learn that microclusters do not form randomly
from any group of 10-1000 atoms; only certain “magic numbers” of atoms will
gather together to form microclusters. The next quote describes how this was
first discovered, and when we read it we should remember that the “mass
spectrum” being mentioned describes spectroscope analysis, which we covered
in the last chapter. When “cluster beams” are being discussed, this means
that atoms (such as Na, or sodium) are being blasted through a tiny nozzle
to form into a “beam” that is then analyzed. Most importantly, as the atoms
blast out of the nozzle, some of them spontaneously gather into
microclusters, which demonstrate anomalous properties:
The microscopic features of microclusters were first revealed by observing
anomalies of the mass spectrum of a Na [sodium] cluster beam at specific
sizes, called magic numbers. Then it was experimentally confirmed that the
magic numbers come from the shell structure of valence electrons. Being
stimulated by these epoch-making findings in metal microclusters and aided
by progress of the experimental techniques producing relatively dense,
non-interacting microclusters of various sizes in the form of
microcluster
beams, the research field of microclusters has developed rapidly in these 5
to 7 years [since the first 1991 edition of the book.] The progress is also
due to the improvement of computers and computational techniques…
The field of
microclusters is attracting the attention of many physicists
and chemists (and even biologists!) working in both pure and applied
research, as it is interesting not only from the fundamental point of view
but also from the viewpoint of applications in electronics, catalysis, ion
engineering, carbon-chemical engineering, photography and so on. At this
stage of development, it is felt that an introductory book is required for
beginners in this field, clarifying fundamental physical concepts important
for the study of microclusters. This book is designed to satisfy such a
requirement. It is based on series of lectures given to graduate students
(mainly in physics) of the University of Tokyo, Kyoto University, Tokyo
Metropolitan University, Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kyushu University
in the period of 1987-1990. [emphasis added]
Our next quote comes from the first area in Sugano and Koizumi’s book where
specific details are given regarding the highly anomalous physical
properties of microclusters. Though they are only slightly smaller than fine
particles in terms of the number of atoms, they are much more stable. Here,
the greater stability refers to the fact that microclusters burn at a much
higher temperature than molecules or fine particles of the same elements.
According to David Hudson, (whom we shall discuss later,) Russian scientists
were the first to discover that microclusters must be burned for more than
200 seconds to reveal a color spectrum to be analyzed, whereas all other
known molecular compounds burn up in a maximum of about 70 seconds:
When we arrive at the fragment called microcluster with a radius of the
order of 10 angstroms by further dividing fine particles, we see that we
have to use physics different from that for fine particles. The essential
difference is derived from the theoretical postulate, partly supported by
experiments, that microclusters of a given shape and size can, in principle,
be extracted and their properties can be measured, even though this kind of
measurement is impossible for fine particles. This postulate may be
justified by considering the fact that clusters of a given regular shape are
very stable as compared with those of the other shapes, the number of which
is rather small. In contrast to this fact, fine particles of different
shapes and a fixed size forming a big ensemble to allow a statistical
treatment are nearly degenerate in energy. This makes impossible the
extraction of fine particles of a given shape.
Clear-cut evidence has been obtained such that microclusters of alkali [1.8]
and noble [1.9] metal elements in the form of a cluster beam have a nearly
spherical shape at the size of the so-called magic numbers. A magic number
means a specific size N [i.e. the number of atoms in the cluster] where
anomalies of abundance in the mass spectra are found. This indicates that
microclusters of those sizes are relatively stable as compared with those of
neighboring sizes. [emphasis added]
The “nearly spherical” shapes that are described above will be seen in later
quotes as the Platonic Solids and related geometries. Our next passage is
probably too technical for most readers and can be skipped over, but it is a
clear-cut description of how the “cluster beams” are being made and analyzed
and what specific “magic numbers” of atoms emerged. Furthermore, we should
note that the clusters that are formed become electrically neutral, which is
another anomalous and unexpected result:
As an example, we show the mass spectrum of the Na cluster beam in Fig. 1.5.
The beam is produced by the adiabatic expansion of a heated Na and Ar gas
mixture through a nozzle. The Na clusters in the beam are photoionized, mass
analyzed by a quadrupole mass analyzer, and finally detected by an
ion-detection system. Detailed examinations of the experiment verify that
the mass spectrum thus observed reflects that of [electrically] neutral
clusters originally produced by the jet expansion. The anomalies of
abundance of the size N, being 8, 20, 40, 58 and 93 (Fig. 1.5), are regarded
as the magic numbers of neutral Na clusters. [emphasis added]
Now pay very close attention to the next sentence, as its significance can
easily be missed:
In what follows, we shall show that these magic numbers are associated with
the shell structure of valence electrons moving independently in a
spherically symmetric effective potential… [emphasis added]
What this is telling us is that the hypothetical “electrons” are no longer
bound to their individual atoms in microclusters, but rather move
independently throughout the entire cluster itself! Remember that in our new
quantum model, there are no electrons, only clouds of aetheric energy that
are flowing in towards the nucleus via the Biefield-Brown effect. In this
case, the microcluster acts as one single atom, with the center of the
cluster becoming akin to the positively-charged atomic nucleus where the
negatively-charged energy is flowing in. Interestingly, in keeping with the
fluidlike behaviors of the aether, the next passage suggests that the
microclusters can have properties similar to a fluid as well as a solid:
[The symmetry of] metal microclusters seems to reveal that
microclusters
belong to the microscopic world like atoms and molecules, whereas fine
particles belong to the macroscopic world. This is true in some aspects, but
not so in every aspect. In Chap. 2 we shall discuss that, at finite internal
temperatures, microclusters may reveal the liquid phase as encountered in
the macroscopic world... [emphasis added]
The next excerpt comes from a completely different study by Besley et al.,
referenced at the end of this chapter, entitled Theoretical Study of the
Structures and Stabilities of Iron Clusters. Obviously, their work builds
directly off of Sugano and Koizumi’s textbook and the findings that went
into its production. Here, the key is that Besley et al.’s research points
to anomalous electrical and magnetic properties possessed by microclusters
that are not seen either in molecules or in condensed matter:
Clusters are also of interest in their own right, since for small clusters
there is the possibility of finite size effects leading to electronic,
magnetic or other properties which are quite different from those of
molecules or condensed matter. There has also been a considerable research
effort into understanding the geometries, stabilities and reactivities of
gas phase bare metal clusters from a theoretical viewpoint. [emphasis added]
And now, as we skip ahead to page 11 of Sugano et al.’s microcluster
physics
textbook, we come to section 1.3.1 entitled Fundamental Polyhedra. This is
where the connection between microclusters and the geometry of
Johnson’s
physics becomes readily apparent:
Recently, it has been discussed [1.12] that
stable shapes of microclusters
are given by Plato’s five polyhedra; the tetrahedron, cube, octahedron,
pentagonal dodecahedron, icosahedron, [i.e., the Platonic Solids]; and
Keplers’ two polyhedra of rhombic faces; the rhombic dodecahedron and
rhombic triacontahedron…
It is very important to note that tetrahedra are not space-filling, as shown
in Fig. 1.9, and icosahedra, trigonal decahedra and pentagonal dodecahedra
with five-fold rotational symmetry are non-crystalline structures: they do
not grow into the periodic structure of the bulk. If the polyhedron is a
non-crystalline structure, then the microcluster has to undergo a phase
transition to a crystalline structure on the way of growing into the bulk.
[emphasis added]
For one who has studied sacred geometry for many years, it is amazing to
consider that at a level far too tiny for the naked eye, atoms are grouping
together into perfect Platonic Solid formations. It is also interesting to
consider that some of these microclusters also have fluidlike qualities,
allowing them to flow from one type of geometric structure into another. In
their text, Sugano and Koizumi have assumed that certain polyhedra such as
the icosahedron and dodecahedron are non-crystalline, and must therefore
undergo a phase change before they could become a larger crystallized
object. However, later in this chapter we will present hard, irrefutable
evidence that the entire model of crystallography is flawed, and that under
certain circumstances, formations very similar to microclusters can be
formed at larger levels of size, from two or more atomic elements grouped
together.
Importantly, as the reader thumbs through the rest of Sugano et al.’s
textbook, scores of diagrams of atoms grouped into Platonic Solids are seen.
We learn that the “magic number” groupings of atoms will, in every case,
form into one of the geometric structures mentioned above. If we took a
tetrahedron, for example, and constructed it out of a certain number of
marbles that all had an equal width, then we would need an exact “magic”
number of marbles to construct a tetrahedron of a given size. This is the
same as Buckminster Fuller’s model of “close-packed spheres,” and in its
simplest form is expressed by seeing that if you put three marbles together
into a triangle and then place a fourth marble above it in the middle, you
will see a tetrahedron form.
Even more interestingly, on page 18 of the Microcluster Physics textbook,
Sugano et al. have a photograph of a gold cluster consisting of “about 460”
atoms, where we can clearly see the close-packed sphere structure of the
atoms inside, forming unmistakable geometry. These images are taken by a
scanning electron microscope at very high magnification, and the structure
of the cuboctahedron geometry [Fig. 3.3, L] is clearly visible in a series
of different angles. Interestingly, the cluster is seen to undergo different
geometric changes from the cuboctahedron to other forms in its structure
from image to image, again suggesting a fluidlike quality, and unseen
“stresses” in the aether at work. Figure 3.3 is an artist-rendered diagram
of how the “magic number” of 459 spherical atoms will pack together to form
a cuboctahedron-shaped cluster, whereas 561 atoms will cluster into the form
of an icosahedron.
Figure 3.3 - Cuboctahedral cluster of 459 atoms (L) and Icosahedral cluster
of 561 atoms (R)
Our next quote comes from section 3 of Besley et al.’s study, which
discusses the “jellium” model and makes it very clear that the individual
nature of the atoms in a microcluster is lost in favor of a group behavior.
Again we will see the mentioning of magic numbers and of electrons moving
through the entire structure instead of just through their parent atom; we
also see the hypothesis that “geometric shells” of electrons are somehow
formed in the microcluster.
For small clusters of simple metals, such as the alkali metals, mass
spectroscopic studies have indicated the presence of preferred nuclearities
or “magic numbers” corresponding to particularly intense peaks. These
experiments led to the development of the (spherical) jellium model, wherein
the actual cluster geometry (i.e. the nuclear coordinates) are unknown and
unimportant (perhaps because the clusters are molten or rapidly fluxional)
and the cluster valence electrons are assumed to move in a spherically
average central potential. The jellium model therefore explains cluster
magic numbers in terms of the filling of cluster electronic shells, which
are analogous to the electronic shells in atoms. For somewhat larger nuclearities (N ~ 100-1500 [total atoms in the cluster,]) there are periodic
oscillations in mass spectral peak intensities which have been attributed to
the bunching together of electronic shells into supershells.
The observation of long period oscillations in the intensities of peaks in
the mass spectra of very large metal clusters (with up to 10^5 atoms) has
led to the conclusion that such clusters grow via the formation of
3-dimensional geometric shells of atoms and that for these nuclearities it
is the filling of geometric rather than electronic shells that imparts extra
cluster stability.
Certainly, the idea of “supershells” of electrons suggests a fluidlike
blending together of atoms in the quantum realm. Again, it appears that the
entire idea of electrons is flawed, since the next passage from Besley et
al., tells us that the “jellium” model where “particle” electrons fill up
into “geometric shells” does not work for what are known as transition
metals. Since there can be no individual electrons at this point, Besley et
al. hypothesize the existence of “explicit angular-dependent many-body
forces.” In short, a “fluid crystal” aetheric quantum model is essentially
required to explain the forces that create microclusters:
For transition metals there is no clear evidence that the
jellium model
holds, even for low nuclearities… we would hope that a model which
introduces explicit angular-dependent many-body forces (as in the MM
[Murrell-Mottram] model that we have adopted) will fare better at explaining
cluster structure preferences.
As we think through the results of these microcluster studies, we must not
forget that the Platonic Solids are very easily formed by vibrating a
spherical area of fluid. It is quite surprising that the microcluster
researchers do not appear to have noticed this connection. The prevailing
view of quantum mechanics as a particle phenomenon has such a strong hold on
the minds of scientific researchers that elaborate explanations involving
“geometric shells” of electrons must be invoked. The key question that must
be addressed is how and why this geometry would form – and the idea of a
vibrating, fluidlike quantum medium is by far the simplest answer. A
microcluster is simply a larger “aetheric atom” in a perfect geometric form.
3.5 DAVID HUDSON AND “ORMUS ELEMENTS”
KNOWN ORMUS
ELEMENTS
|
Element |
Atomic Number
|
Cobalt
|
27
|
Nickel
|
28
|
Copper
|
29
|
Ruthenium
|
44
|
Rhodium
|
45
|
Palladium
|
46
|
Silver
|
47
|
Osmium
|
76
|
Iridium
|
77
|
Platinum
|
78
|
Gold
|
79
|
Mercury
|
80
|
Table 3.1 – Known Metallic Microclusters or “Ormus” Elements in David
Hudson’s patent.
Next, we introduce the work of David Hudson, who discovered a substance that
turned out to contain microclusters in a goldmine on his property in the
late 1970s. He spent several million dollars having these mysterious
materials analyzed and tested in various ways, and in 1989 Hudson patented
his microcluster discovery by naming them Orbitally Rearranged Monatomic
Elements, or “ORMEs.” [The name is usually changed to “Ormus” or “M-state”
elements when discussed online so as not to interfere with Hudson’s
copyrights.] Hudson displays a broad knowledge of microcluster physics in
his published lectures from the early 1990s, but his findings are more
controversial than what we find in Sugano et al.’s textbook or other
published mainstream sources. Hudson’s patent focuses on the microcluster
structures he found in the following precious metal elements. (We should
note here that Sugano and Koizumi have established that microclusters have
been found in non-metallic elements as well.)
Hudson found that all of the above microcluster metals
exist plentifully in
sea water. Even more surprisingly, Hudson discovered that these elements in
the microcluster state may be up to 10,000 times more abundant on Earth than
in their common metallic state. Hudson’s research demonstrated that these
metallic microclusters are found throughout many different biological
systems, including many different plants, and that they form up to 5% of the
material in a calf’s brain by weight. Furthermore,
-
they act as
room-temperature superconductors,
-
have superfluid qualities and
-
levitate in
the presence of magnetic fields, since no magnetic energy is able to
penetrate through their outer shells.
Their physical qualities match the
descriptions of various materials in alchemical traditions from China,
India, Persia and Europe. Various people have volunteered to ingest gold microclusters or “monatomic gold,” and have reported experiencing the same
psychic effects as the kundalini changes noted in the
Vedic scriptures of
ancient India.
Even more controversial are Hudson’s patented discoveries surrounding the
heating of iridium microclusters. As the material is heated, its weight is
seen to increase by 300 percent or more. Even more surprisingly, as
microcluster iridium is heated to 850 degrees Celsius, the material
disappears from physical view and loses all of its weight. However, when the
temperature is again reduced, the microcluster iridium will reappear and
regain most of its former weight. In Hudson’s patent, he has a chart that
was generated by thermo-gravimetric analysis that shows this effect in
action.
The idea of a material gaining weight, then spontaneously losing weight and
disappearing from all physical view is no longer out of place when we
combine Kozyrev’s findings with Ginzburg’s changes to conventional
relativity equations and Mishin and Aspden’s discoveries of multiple
densities of aether. In the first chapter, Kozyrev showed how the heating or
cooling of an object can affect its weight in subtle but measurable ways. We
also saw that these weight increases and decreases occur in sudden
“quantized” bursts, not in a smooth, flowing fashion. Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg
suggested that an object’s mass is converted into pure field as it
approaches the speed of light, and Mishin and Aspden’s data suggests that
the mass is actually moving into a higher density of aetheric energy.
Thus, Hudson’s observed and patented effects with microcluster iridium
provide the first major proof in this volume for the idea that an object can
be completely displaced into a higher density of aetheric energy. In the
case of microcluster iridium, it would seem that the geometric structure of
the microcluster allows for heat energy to be harnessed much more
efficiently. This harnessing of the vibrations of heat then creates extreme
resonance at a lower relative temperature, bringing the internal vibrations
of the iridium past the speed of light. (These internal vibrations may
already be relatively close to the speed of light before such added
resonance is introduced, due to the speed at which aether flows through the
atomic “vortex” of negative electron clouds and the positive nucleus.) Then,
when the threshold point of light-speed is finally reached, the aetheric
energy of the iridium is displaced into a higher density, thus causing it to
disappear from measurable view. When the temperature is reduced, the iridium
again displaces back down into our own density, since the pressure that was
holding it in the higher density has now been eliminated.
3.6 ANOMALIES OF CRYSTAL FORMATION
Now that we have covered the anomalous area of microclusters, we are ready
to tackle the more conventionally understood problems of crystal formation.
Common table salt is a perfect example of how two different elements, sodium
and chloride, can bond together and form a Platonic Solid geometry, in this
case the cube. Two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom form together in the
shape of a tetrahedron to create the water molecule, (which is not a crystal
in the liquid state but has a tetrahedral molecule,) and fluorite crystals
form the octahedron. Crystals that form with these properties will maintain
the same orientation throughout themselves, and are symmetrical. A more
technical description is that crystals are “solids which have flat surfaces
(facets) that intersect at characteristic angles, and are ordered at a
microscopic level.” Our key question to remember here would be, “Why do
spherical energy vortexes end up joining together in these characteristic
geometric angles and patterns?” The answer, of course, shall be found in our
understanding of the Platonic Solids as “harmonic” energy structures in the aether.
Glusker & Trueblood’s classical definition for how crystals are formed is
that they are produced by:
…a regularly repeating arrangement of atoms. Any crystal may be regarded as
being built up by the continuing three-dimensional translational repetition
of some basic structural pattern. [emphasis added]
The term “translation” means that we rotate a specific object by an exact
number of degrees, such as 180, which would form a “two-fold” crystal since
there are two such translations in a 360-degree circle. Thus, “translational
repetition” means that that the basic structural element (atom or molecular
group of atoms) making up a crystal can be rotated again and again in the
same way to form the repeated pattern. The technical term for such a regular
arrangement of atoms is periodicity, which means that a crystal is made up
of “some basic structural unit which repeats itself infinitely in all
directions, filling up all of space” within itself. The same structure (atom
or group of atoms) keeps repeating in the same, periodic way, hence the term
periodicity.
In this classical theory of “periodic” crystal formation, each atom retains
its original size and shape and does not affect any of the other atoms
except for those it is directly bonded to.
It is important to realize that the model of periodicity worked very well in
crystallography. Any type of crystal that had been discovered could be
analyzed with this method, and the angles between all of the facets could be
predicted based on simple geometric principles. Then in 1912, Max von Laue
discovered a way to use X-rays to illuminate the inner structure of
crystals, creating what is known as a “diffraction diagram.” The diagram
appears as an arrangement of single points of light on a black background.
This led to a whole science of X-ray crystallography that was formalized by
William H. and William L. Bragg, where the points of light are analyzed
geometrically in relation to each other in order to determine what the
structure of the true crystal actually is. For seventy years after this
technology was developed, every diffraction diagram that had ever been
observed by mainstream scientists fit the periodicity model perfectly, which
led to the inevitable and apparently quite simple conclusion that all
crystals were an arrangement of single atoms as structural units.
One of the periodicity model’s most straightforward mathematical rules is
that a crystal can only have 2-, 3-, 4-, and 6-fold rotations
(translations.) In this model, if you have a crystal that is indeed made of
single atoms or molecules in a repeating, periodic structure, the crystal
cannot have a five-fold rotation or any rotation higher than 6. Atoms are
“supposed” to retain their own individual point-like identities and not
merge with other atoms into a larger whole. Nevertheless, in terms of pure
geometry, the dodecahedron has 5-fold symmetry and the icosahedron has 5-
and 10-fold symmetry. These Platonic Solids fit all the requirements for
symmetry as outlined by Dr. Wolff earlier in this chapter, but you simply
cannot pack single atoms together to make either of these shapes. So again,
the dodecahedron and icosahedron have symmetry, but they do not have
periodicity as crystal formations. Therefore, there was no provision in
science to believe that either of these forms would appear as a molecular,
crystalline structure – it was “impossible.” Or so they thought…
Now enter the infamous Roswell crash. According to former
Groom Lake / Area
51 employee Edgar Fouche, molecular structures were found on the recovered
hardware that did not fit the conventional model of crystalline periodicity.
These became known as “quasi-crystals,” short for “quasi-periodic crystals.”
Both the icosahedron and dodecahedron have appeared in these unique alloys.
Similar to microclusters but on a larger level of size, these quasi-crystals
were discovered to have many strange properties, such as extreme strength,
extreme resistance to heat and being non-conductive to electricity, even if
the metals involved in their creation would normally act as conductors!
(This will be explained as we progress.) Unlike microclusters, which only
appear to be able to be formed individually from “cluster beams”,
quasi-crystals can be grouped together into usable alloys.
Fouche states the
following on his website, with our added emphasis:
I’ve held positions within the USAF that required me to have Top Secret and
‘Q’ Clearances and Top Secret-Crypto access clearances…
In the mess hall at [the top-secret]
Groom [Lake facility,] I heard words
like Lorentz Forces, pulse detonation, cyclotron radiation, quantum flux
transduction field generators, quasi-crystal energy lens and EPR quantum
receivers. I was told that quasi-crystals were the key to a whole new field
of propulsion and communication technologies.
To this day I’d be hard pressed to explain to you the unique electrical,
optical and physical properties of quasi-crystals and why so much of the
research is classified…
Fourteen years of quasi-crystal research has established the existence of a
wealth of stable and meta-stable quasi-crystals with five-, eight-, ten- and
twelve-fold symmetry, with strange structures [such as the dodecahedron and
icosahedron] and interesting properties. New tools had to be developed for
the study and description of these extraordinary materials.
I’ve discovered that the classified research has shown that
quasi-crystals
are promising candidates for high energy storage materials, metal matrix
components, thermal barriers, exotic coatings, infrared sensors, high power
laser applications and electro-magnetics. Some high strength alloys and
surgical tools are already on the market. [Note: Wilcock was personally told
in 1993 that Teflon and Kevlar are both reverse-engineered.]
One of the stories I was told more than once was that one of the crystal
pairs used in the propulsion of the Roswell crash was a Hydrogen Crystal.
Until recently, creating a Hydrogen crystal was beyond the reach of our
scientific capabilities. That has now changed. In one
Top Secret Black
Program, under the DOE, a method to produce hydrogen crystals was
discovered, [and] then manufacturing began in 1994.
The lattice of hydrogen quasi-crystals, and another material not named,
formed the basis for the plasma shield propulsion of the Roswell craft and
was an integral part of the bio-chemically engineered vehicle. A myriad of
advanced crystallography undreamed of by scientists were discovered by the
scientists and engineers who evaluated, analyzed and attempted to reverse
engineer the technology presented with the Roswell vehicle and eight more
vehicles which have crashed since then.
Arguably after 35 years of secret research on the Roswell hardware, those
who had recovered these technologies still had hundreds if not thousands of
unanswered questions about what they had found, and it was deemed “safe” to
quietly introduce “quasi-crystals” to the non-initiated scientific world.
There are now literally thousands of different references to quasi-crystals
on the Internet, completely separate from any mention of microclusters. (Not
a single scientific study that we have been able to find online mentions
both microclusters and quasi-crystals in the same document.) Many of the
quasi-crystal references are from companies that are government contractors,
and it is very easy to see that they are being studied with widespread
intensity. However, they are almost never mentioned in the general media,
even though they present such a unique challenge to our prevailing theories
of quantum physics. The research goes on, but it is with a very subdued
excitement.
Dan Schechtman was given the honor / duty of having “discovered” (or being
allowed to re-discover) quasi-crystals on April 8, 1982 with an
Aluminum-Manganese alloy (Al6Mn) that began in a molten liquid state and was
then cooled off very quickly. Crystals in the shape of an icosahedron were
produced, as determined by the X-ray diffraction diagram that was seen,
similar to the image below. Schechtman’s data was not even published until
November 1984! In the image to the right of Figure 3.4, we can clearly see a
number of pentagons, indicating the five-fold symmetry of the icosahedron:
"click" image to see
multimedia
Figure 3.4 – The Icosahedron (L) and its X-ray diffraction diagram from a
quasi-crystal formation (R).
As we said, with the advent of quasi-crystals, both the dodecahedron and
icosahedron appear, along with other unusual geometric forms, completing the
appearance of all five of the Platonic Solids in the molecular realm in some
way. Both the dodecahedron and icosahedron possess elements of five-fold
symmetry with their pentagonal structures. Figure 3.5, from An Pang Tsai of
NRIM in Tsukuba, Japan, shows an Aluminum-Copper-Iron quasi-crystal alloy in
the shape of a dodecahedron and an Aluminum-Nickel-Cobalt alloy in the shape
of a decagonal (10-sided) prism:
Figure 3.5 – Dodecahedral (L) and decagonal prism (R) quasi-crystals created
by An Pang Tsai of NRIM.
The problem here is that you cannot create such crystals by using single
atoms bound together, yet as we can see in the photographs, they are very
real. The key problem for scientists, then, is how to explain and define the
process by which these crystals are forming. According to A.L. Mackay, one
of the ways to include five-fold symmetry in a crystallographic definition
is “Abandonment of Atomicity:”
Fractal structures with five-fold axes everywhere require that atoms of
finite size be abandoned. This is not a rational assumption to the
crystallographers of the world, but the mathematicians are free to explore
it. [emphasis added]
What this suggests is that similar to microclusters, quasi-crystals appear
to not have individual atoms anymore, but rather that the atoms have merged
into a unity throughout the entire crystal. While this may seem impossible
for crystallographers to believe, it is actually among the simplest of A.L.
Mackay’s four potential solutions to the problem, as it involves simple
three-dimensional geometry and correlates with our microcluster
observations. Again, since the crystals are very real, the only major hurdle
to cross is our fixation on the belief that atoms are made of particles.
Another related example is seen with the Bose-Einstein Condensate, which was
first theorized in 1925 by Albert Einstein and Satyendranath Bose, and was
first demonstrated in a gas in 1995. In short, a Bose-Einstein Condensate is
a large group of atoms that behaves as if it were one single “particle,”
with each constituent atom appearing to simultaneously occupy all of space
and all of time throughout the entire structure. All the atoms are measured
to vibrate at the exact same frequency and travel at the same speed, and all
appear to be located in the same area of space. Rigorously, the various
parts of the system act as a unified whole, losing all signs of
individuality. It is this very property that is required for a
“superconductor” to exist. (A superconductor is a substance that conducts
electricity with no loss of current.)
Typically, the Bose-Einstein condensate is only able to be formed at
extremely low temperatures. However, we seem to be observing a similar
process occurring in microclusters and quasi-crystals, where there is no
longer a sense of individual atomic identity. Interestingly, yet another
similar process is at work with laser light, known as “coherent” light. In
the case of the laser, the entire light beam behaves as if it were one
single “photon” in space and time – there is no way to differentiate
individual photons in the laser beam. It is interesting to note that lasers,
superconductors and quasi-crystals were all found in
recovered ET
technologies since the 1940s.
This obviously introduces a whole new world of quantum physics to the
discussion table. In time, it appears that quasi-crystals and Bose-Einstein
condensates will be much more widely used and understood as examples of how
we had gone astray in our “particle”-based quantum thinking. Furthermore,
British physicist Herbert Froehlich proposed in the late 1960’s that living
systems frequently behave as Bose-Einstein condensates, suggesting a
larger-scale order that is at work. We will discuss this in later chapters
that will deal with aetheric biology.
Figure 3.6 –
Dan Winter’s reprint of Sir William Crookes’ geometric Table of
the Elements.
Our next question concerns the “electron clouds” that have been seen in the
atom. Both Rod Johnson and Dan Winter have noted that the teardrop-shaped
“electron clouds” in the atom will all fit perfectly together with the faces
of the Platonic Solids. Winter refers to the electron clouds as “vortex
cones,” and Figure 3.6 is an unfortunately illegible copy of the Periodic
Table of the Elements as originally devised by Sir William Crookes, a
well-known and highly respected scientist from the early 20th century who
later became an investigator into the field of parapsychology. At the bottom
of the image, we see an illustration of how the “vortex cones” fit on each
face of the Platonic Solids.
(It appears that a more legible copy of Figure 3.5 may exist in one of
Winter’s earlier books. Some of the element names can be made out when
viewing the image at full size, and the others can be inferred by their
position relative to the known Periodic Table of the Elements. The chart is
obviously read from the top down, and the first element that is written out
below the two circles in the center is Helium, and the line then moves to
each successive element. The scale to the left is a series of degree
measurements, beginning with 0 at the top line and counting by units of 10°
for each line. The degree numbers written in on the scale are 50, 100, 150,
200, 250, 300, 350 and 400. This appears to indicate that Sir Crookes’
theory involved set angular rotations or translations of the elements in
terms of their geometry as we move from one element to the next. We can see
that the wave is mostly straight, but at times there are “dips” in the line
that appear to correspond to larger angular rotations that must be made.)
If we think back to what Dr. Aspden wrote about Platonic Solids in the
aether, he stated that they act as “fluid crystals,” meaning that
they can
behave as a solid and as a liquid at the same time. Thus, once we understand
that electron clouds are all being positioned by invisible Platonic Solids,
it becomes much easier to see how crystals are being formed and even how
quasi-crystals could be made. There are “nests” of
Platonic Solids in the
atom, one solid for each major sphere in the “nest”, just as there are
“nests” of electron clouds at different levels of valence that all co-exist.
The Platonic Solids form an energetic structure and framework that the
aetheric energy must flow through as it rushes towards the low-pressure
positive center of the atom. Thus, we see each face of the Solids acting as
a funnel that the flowing energy must pass through, creating what Winter
called “vortex cones.”
With the necessary context in place, Johnson’s concepts of Platonic symmetry
within the structure of atoms and molecules in the next chapter should not
seem as strange to us now as they would to most people. Given what we have
seen with the comprehensive research that has gone on, especially with
quasi-crystal engineering, it appears that this information is already in
use by humanity in certain circles.
REFERENCES:
1. Aspden, Harold. Energy Science Tutorial #5. 1997. URL:
http://www.energyscience.co.uk/tu/tu05.htm
2. Crane, Oliver et al. Central Oscillator and Space-Time Quanta Medium.
Universal Expert Publishers, June 2000, English Edition. ISBN 3-9521259-2-X
3. Duncan, Michael A. and Rouvray, Dennis H. Microclusters. Scientific
American Magazine, December 1989.
4. Fouche, Edgar. Secret Government Technology. Fouche Media Associates,
Copyright 1998/99. URL:
http://fouchemedia.com/arap/speech.htm
5. Hudson, David. (ORMUS Elements) URL:
http://www.subtleenergies.com
6. Kooiman, John. TR-3B Antigravity Physics Explained. 2000.
URL:http://www.fouchemedia.com/Kooiman.htm
7. Mishin, A.M. (Levels of aetheric density) URL:
http://alexfrolov.narod.ru/chernetsky.htm
8. Winter, Dan. Braiding DNA: Is Emotion the Weaver? 1999. URL:
http://soulinvitation.com/braidingDNA/BraidingDNA.html
9. Wolff, Milo. Exploring the Physics of the Unknown Universe. Technotran
Press, Manhattan Beach, CA, 1990. ISBN 0-9627787-0-2. URL:
http://members.tripod.com/mwolff
|