by Eric Julien
from
ExopoliticsInstitute Website
Translated
by Chuck Brandstater
About the Author: Eric Julien (aka
Jean Ederman) is
trained as a fighter pilot, has been a military air
controller, a twin-engine pilot in commercial aviation,
and an airline port chief; he has worked in the
framework of operations in large Parisian airports.
Holder of a Diploma of Advanced Specialized Studies in
Economic Sciences with a concentration in new
technologies, he obtained training as a director of
international airports at the Ecole Nationale de
l’Aviation Civile (National School of Civil
Aviation).
He confirms having had
contacts with
extraterrestrials and is sharing his understanding of
the universe through this work. More info at:
http://www.savelivesinmay.com/
[Note:
Eric Julien is a speaker at the
Extraterrestrial
Civilizations & World Peace Conference] |
We are in the habit of thinking about
extraterrestrials as potential invaders. What is this idea of them
as a security threat based on? Essentially on two aspects: ignorance
of our impact in the universe; and our beliefs forged by popular
movies. Yet the reality is very different. To these two reasons can
be added a third: the fear of being inferior. It is enough to
analyze the present situation and to understand the laws that govern
the world in order to become conscious of our own role in the
appearance of UFOs, that is, of extraterrestrials. It is important
to distinguish two historical periods: before and after the Second
World War!
We are not going to discuss here the extraterrestrial hypothesis
(ETH), which is logically supported by the observations of tens of
thousands of witnesses. Indeed, the equation is rigorously simple.
Unusual aerial and undersea phenomena are observed by witnesses many
of whom are trustworthy (pilots, air controllers, scientists, ship
commanders, military officers, and so on).
These phenomena,
sometimes in the form of objects detected by radar, are not only
outside the framework of “natural” explanations but demonstrate
intelligent behavior: following of vehicles or people, evasive
bearings, instantaneous disappearances and/or appearances of
creatures inside and outside the vessels, flybys over strategic
locations, etc. The performance of these objects, attested by
physical measures, is well beyond that of our best technologies.
Overwhelming clues
At the end of 1953, the very official (United States)
Project Blue
Book delivered its initial report on UFOs as Captain Ruppelt
explained:
“Since June 1947, when the first
UFO report had been
made, ATIC had analyzed 1,593 UFO reports. About 4,400 had actually
been received, but all except 1,593 had been immediately rejected
for analysis…. in five and a half years something like 44,000 UFO
sightings had been made…The reports that we were interested in were
the 26.94 per cent or 429 “Unknowns,” so we had studied them in
great detail.”1
A qualitative and quantitative study of the engineer
Laurent Gonin, a volunteer contributor to the SEPRA [Service
d’Expertise des Phénomènes de Rentrées Atmosphériques - Atmospheric
Re-entry Phenomena Expertise Department], enlightens us on the
reality of these feats and of this intelligence.2 In his report on
cases of simultaneous radar and visual sightings, he identifies the
measured feats of UFOs:
• 23% of UFOs have a speed higher than mach 3.
• 18% of UFOs are stationary. • 14% of UFOs disappear on the spot.
• 5% execute sharp turns (equivalent to several tens of g’s).
...and their intelligent behavior:
• 24% carry out aerial maneuvers.
• 19% follow planes. • 12% flee from planes. • 8% simulate a near-collision
• 3% are in formation. • 3% engage in aerial combat.
As of September 28, 1947 (some weeks after the historic observation
made by Kenneth Arnold), a memorandum of General Nathan F. Twining,
Chief of the Air Material Command, clearly established that for the
whole of the observations:
“A. The phenomenon reported is something real and not visionary or
fictitious.
B. These objects are approximately in the form of a disk
...
C. the reported characteristics, such as the elevated speed of
ascent, the maneuverability (particularly in rolling), as well as
the possibilities of evasion when they are detected by radar, let us
believe that certain of these objects are controlled manually,
automatically or at a distance.”3
This
memo, reference TSDIN/HMM/ig/6-4100,
showed from the beginning that our MHD (MagnetoHydroDynamic)
technology was incompatible (“particularly in roll”) with the
technology at work in UFOs. Besides, a letter from General Schulgen
addressed to the FBI indicated on September 5, 1947,
“the Army Air
Forces has no project with the characteristics similar to those
which have been associated with the Flying Discs.”4
If these
creatures, objects or phenomena are not from here, they are from
elsewhere! QED. But are their feats truly
incomprehensible? No! The
book, The Science of the Extraterrestrials, describes the new
temporal paradigm in which UFOs are perfectly explainable.5 The
problem thus is twofold.
-
How do UFOs act?
-
What do they want?
To
answer these two questions we need to go through a close examination
of the state of the art in scientific matters.
A third question is
implicit:
Maybe, then, we will define what the Elsewhere means.
Before getting there, we need to recall that contemporary science is
far from at an end. We are but at the beginnings of our quest.
The special issue marking the 35th anniversary of
La Recherche,
dated October 2005, invited us to discover “the most perplexing
enigmas of science.” 6 For the occasion, 35 enigmas were picked for
presentation. An exhaustive list of the questions that lack answers
would probably resemble a phonebook.
Among the most important enigmas are included those that touch on
Ufology! “In search of zero time?”; “What is life?”; “The
ultimate
equation for physics?”; “How do neurons manufacture
consciousness?”; “Why do people have so few genes?”
Although emblematic, the choice of those 35 enigmas was
necessarily arbitrary. Ufologists as well as parapsychologists might
have suggested plenty of others. What needs recalling is that before
rushing to embrace prosaic solutions to explain UFOs, certain
scientists would do well to sweep their own rooms. This digression
has as its purpose to open the minds of those whom the development
that follows might frighten.
We are going to show that the atomic
weapons put in use at the end of the Second World War constituted
the founding and triggering element of the flying saucer era. We
have, in our ignorance, created the conditions for the irruption of
the galaxy into the environment of our little blue planet. Far from
representing but a scientific interest for our visitors, we have
become their security threat. From there stems the sprawling
spectrum of their behaviors in our view.
A burdensome character, an annoying book
Let us start with the phenomenological indices of the correlation
between nuclear devices and UFOs. One of the most
striking aspects
of Ufological casuistry is the flyby, or even the neutralization of
nuclear sites, be they civil or military. The work of Jean-Jacques
Velasco and Nicolas Montigiani, OVNI, l’évidence, is useful in more
than one respect.
To the minds of many, this book is above all the work of the
management of the SEPRA (in the bosom of the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales) more than of private citizen
Velasco. Though
declaring that he was
expressing only his own opinions, and not those of his prestigious
institution, Jean-Jacques
Velasco yet relies on the files of
SEPRA accumulated through the
course of the years, reports of
which he shows all the affection he has for them by entitling his
second chapter “I open my
files.”
These archives are unique in all the world:
• they were drawn up in the
bosom of an official state entity • they cover a period of several decades of recorded UFO cases
The official reaction to the appearance of the work was most
disturbing. Right away, Jean-Jacques Velasco was asked to submit his
resignation from SEPRA to the CNES (Centre National d’Etudes
Spatiales – France’s equivalent to NASA) since his academic
conclusions were not to the liking of his superiors. In essence,
Velasco declares that UFOs are of extraterrestrial origin and that a
nuclear/UFO correlation is indubitable. In return for his
resignation, which curiously occurred in silence, the CNES accepted
the launching of a Steering Committee presided over by Yves Sillard
for the successor of SEPRA, that is,
GEIPAN (with an “I”).
Yves Sillard was, among other things,
Director General of the CNES. He
was even there at the start of GEPAN in 1977, this being the
structure that preceded SEPRA.7
Sillard has confirmed the words of
Jean-Jacques Velasco concerning the proportion (13.5 %) of the cases
of UFOs that are unexplained and inexplicable with the fundamentals
of current science. Let us not forget that Yves Sillard is a
scientist at a high level.
Before approaching the substance of the book, it would not be
unimportant to indicate that Carnot Editions, publisher of Velasco
and Montigiani, went into liquidation some months after this
publication! It is difficult to make an enlightened commentary on
the reasons for this bankruptcy. It remains no less true that this
coincidence is disturbing. Velasco is thus prevented from having his
book widely distributed. Furthermore, he is in litigation to
retrieve his author’s rights. The response of the CNES was to offer
him a position in the Communications Department of CNES. What is
more inhibiting to expressing oneself than responsibility for the
communication of the department to which one belongs? By all
appropriate means, Jean-Jacques Velasco has been silenced.
What does this series of obstacles mean? Many Ufologists have seen
in the work, OVNI,
l’évidence, nothing but a compilation of the best-known cases. On
the basis of these comments, I
myself approached the reading of his book with this truncated view.
In closing it, I realized that the majority of French Ufologists had
not understood its main point at all. They had bypassed the
essential. The reminders of the solid cases in reality served a
clear objective: the nuclear/UFOs correlation. This is no novelty in
and of itself. Many knew that UFOs had done flybys over strategic
sites. But why?
The French ought to remember that Michel Debré, who later became
Prime Minister, had pleaded before the French Senate, in July 1954,
for the manufacture of atomic weapons, and a budget of 100 million
francs was approved for the development of the nuclear arsenal in
December 1954; this was the year of the greatest wave of UFOs that
the country has known, in particular above military nerve centers
(Vernon, Coulommiers, Metz, Orange) in the second half of the year.
French military officials do not have a short memory. Besides, they
were the first to record observations of Mysterious Celestial
Objects (MCO).
UFOs have also done flybys over plenty of other places, essentially
in the country, in the middle of nowhere. Thus, in the ambient
noise, the “nuclear” signals do not appear clearly. The novelty
comes from the placement in perspective of three aspects of
importance since the dawn of the UFO phenomenon as understood today:
• The superposition of the statistical patterns for observations of
UFOs with those for nuclear tests. • The same people are behind nuclear deployment and official reports
on UFOs. • UFOs are often spotted above nuclear sites.
It is not unimportant to note a connection between the audit of
SEPRA and the comments of J.J. Velasco.8 He indicates at the start
of his seventh chapter:
“A wild course of the arms industry will
make the factories turn to the sole advantage of guns, instead of
improving the lot of the populace.”
When one knows that 36% of the
people questioned in the audit of the SEPRA are in or tied to the
military, and that they constitute the majority of those
interviewed, one will hardly be astonished at the consequences
described above.
Nor will one be astonished at the wall of silence that covers the
UFO phenomenon in the media, an embarrassed silence that they
replace without restraint with the dismissive tone of sarcasm. Did
you know that the CNES, reputedly a civilian center, benefited, as
assigned project manager, from 15 million francs of the 2000 budget
for military space equipment of the Ministère de la Défense
Nationale {National Defense Ministry}, with some 250 million francs
of budget upstream under consideration?
The budget of the European
Union for military space equipment is 500 million euros annually.
The part that comes back to France represents 2.5% of its own budget
for military equipment. For the USA, it is 10%! Taking into account
the American budget devoted to military equipment overall, there is
no doubt that the technical progress made across the Atlantic has
been well beyond that in Europe.
As for those who demand proof, let them start by requiring
transparency. But too few free themselves of the tricks that the
nuclear expo exhibitors play before their eyes. The UFO is never
under the expected cup. Distraction is an old method but it always
works. They even applaud their trick by hiding behind the
smokescreen of rationalism.
The nuclear actors become Ufologists
Velasco indicates:
“This is the outcome of the most secret program
ever put in motion by humanity: the Manhattan Project. The mission
was the work of a team of physicists placed under the authority of
the physicist Julius Robert Oppenheimer (and among these scientists
there figure names that we will find, in some cases, closely
involved in stories of flying saucers, such as John von Neumann,
Robert Sarbacher or even
Edward Condon)” .
Examining official documents declassified by the USA, the former
head of the SEPRA specifies
that the first meeting on the subject of UFOs took place at Los
Alamos, high point of the nuclear-military establishment, on Wednesday, February 16, 1949, in the
presence of Edward Teller,
father of the H-bomb.
Investigations of UFO flybys have been
conducted in the bosom of the
predominantly nuclear air bases (Albuquerque, Los Alamos, Kirtland, Sandia, Alamogordo,
Holloman, Pepperell, Malmstrom, Minot, Fairchild, Kingcloe,
Wurtsmith, Sawyer, Plattburg,
Loring, Pease, and so on). On October 2, 1968, a silo at the
Minuteman missile base in North
Dakota was deactivated despite the efforts of the military forces,
while the UFO was observed
for two and a quarter hours (there were twenty witnesses).
The Batelle Institute, a private industrial research organization,
itself had reported on this factor:
“20% of unknown aerial phenomena observed above American territory
occur over regions that include strategic sites.”
9
Velasco cites for
example the nuclear plants at Hanford, Oak Ridge, and Knoxville,
where interceptions are attempted, in vain. We know today that
French cases demonstrate the same nuclear interest on the part of
the extraterrestrials. Thus, this was the case for the observations
of five eyewitnesses on board a military craft above the atomic
testing zone of Colomb-Bechar in the Algerian desert in December
1965.
To return to the USA, and taking into account the extent of its
territory, this figure of 20% does not represent any random
distribution. Nor is it by chance that we have the presence of
nuclear specialists among those dealing with the subject of UFOs.
Plenty of experts in other disciplines could have been chosen to
conduct the official investigations. It becomes clear from that
point on that the secret surrounding UFOs was maintained by the best
experts of the information blackout, those of the Manhattan Project.
This is the reason that the UFO files are at a level higher than Top
Secret.
Recalcitrant rationalists adorn themselves with the virtues of
the
Condon report of the Colorado Project, of which the conclusion is
unquestionably a denial of the UFO phenomenon, and furthermore of
the extraterrestrial hypothesis. This American report from 1969
marks a period to the investigative activities of the Condon
Commission, named for the famous physicist Edward Condon, active
participant in the Manhattan Project (secret development of nuclear
weapons). And yet, the body of the text of this report indicates
very clearly that a non-negligible number of cases remain perfectly
inexplicable. Put otherwise, the conclusion of the investigation was
already written before it took place! Doctors MacDonald, Hynek, and
Saunders denounced Condon’s striking lack of objectivity, as he had
become a de facto spokesman for the United States Air Force.
Similarly, Velasco makes mention of Project White Stork, allotted
from 1951 to 1953 to the Battelle Memorial Institute (Columbus,
Ohio), in the framework of
Project Blue Book.
Lieutenant Edward J. Ruppelt, in charge of Blue Book secretly
entrusted to the Battelle Institute the task of demonstrating that a
statistical study on the exogenous character of UFOs was feasible.
According to Velasco, the Batelle conclusions, indicated in
Special
Report Number 14 (classified as confidential) of the Blue Book
report, and relying on close to four thousand cases spread from 1947
to 1952, establish that 19.7% of the cases are inexplicable. That is
to say, a rate close to, and indeed higher than, that (13.5%) of the SEPRA. But the remarkable aspect of this report is the
clustering of
UFOs around military and/or nuclear sites! Let us note that of the
twelve observations declared solid by the Batelle Institute, seven
are of oval or discoid form.
The UFO/nuclear correlation
But let us return to the nuclear/UFO correlation. Velasco and
Montigiani write on the nuclear programs:
“the declassified
historical archives reveal the taking of positions on the part of
men responsible for great scientific or military programs having to
do with nuclear energy. All make allusion to UFOs.”
Conversely, Jean-Claude Sidoun teaches us in his book, Ovnis,
“that
in May 1950, a study of Lincoln La Paz, meteorite specialist,
confirmed the analysis of 209 observations made by witnesses of
quality setting out how forays of unknown aircraft had signaled
particular interest in all the sectors of nuclear activity
positioned in the USA.” 10
The authors of OVNI, l’évidence observe
that atmospheric nuclear testing began in July 1945, coming to an
end in 1981. Close to 440 megatons of nuclear power were dissipated
in the atmosphere. In contrast, the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
(300,000 deaths) had but 0.015 and 0.021 megatons of power. The
largest explosion was over Soviet territory: 50 megatons!
ILLUSTRATION BY PAUL DIMARE
The authors indicate, “the total number of explosions in the
atmosphere reached 543 aerial tests,” of which the most active
periods were 1954, 1958, and 1961 through 1963. In the last three of
those years, they specify, up to one explosion every three days was
recorded! They assert that as of 1958,
“underground tests began ...
for forty years under the aegis at first of the two traditional
great nuclear powers. They were joined by France, the United
Kingdom, China, India, and Pakistan. Today, we arrive at a total of
1876 underground tests. The last, carried out by India, occurred in
1998.”
That is, a total of 2419 nuclear explosions on Earth from 1945
through 1998! For the
atmospheric tests, 440 megatons. But how many megatons for the
underground tests,
representing the great majority of total nuclear tests? Maybe 1800
megatons cumulative, by
extrapolation from the preceding data.
-
What effects does this
prodigious energy have on the
space-time continuum?
-
What really occurs at the atomic scale for our
visitors?
-
How do they
view the some 7000 nuclear warheads still operational just in the
American arsenal, and close to
6000 warheads on the Russian side?
-
Supposing that each warhead
possesses a power of only 20
megatons, we obtain 260,000 megatons of potential destruction for
only two nations! What more
of the entire globe?
-
Would this figure not be enough to frighten the
extraterrestrials?
-
Are they afraid only that we will destroy
ourselves, or on the contrary that we are a threat to them?
In OVNI,
l’évidence the authors show a most revealing diagram, where, to save
himself from an all-out attack, Jean-Jacques Velasco specifies:
“I
am relying on just a single form of data to support my
demonstration, the cases of visual/radar aeronautical observations
of UFOs. And again: out of 1400 aeronautical cases worldwide, we
will keep just 140, pulled from Laurent Gonin’s base. Those which
were subject to radar measurement simultaneously with the visual
observation.”11
Knowing that Report Number 11 of the
Institut des
Hautes Etudes de Défense Nationale (IHEDN) indicated as of 1977
that, according to a Gallup poll, 90% of observations did not come
to the attention of experts, the real number of radar/visual cases
is a good deal larger than the figures presented below.
The following diagram is a correlation between UFOs and
nuclear
tests. Curved lines represent UFO radar/visual sightings. Light
rectangular bars represents atmospheric nuclear tests. Dark
rectangular bars represent underground nuclear tests.
Source:
Velasco & Montigiani, OVNI, l’évidence, p. 158.
Velasco notes, “in 1998, the end of underground nuclear testing
marks the stop of the
radar/visual cases.”12 Even beyond these exceptional visual/radar
cases, the curves of
observations of UFOs fall drastically in the years since 2000 in
France (see the linked-to audit of the SEPRA). This is also implied
in the UFO crash retrieval book of Ryan Wood where the last of his
database of 74 possible crashes occurred in 1996.13
The diagram
below shows the correlation between UFO crashes (approximately 70
from Wood’s database) and nuclear tests (2419). We can see that the
extraterrestrials might have anticipated future increases in nuclear
explosions.
The above graphs inspire two hypotheses.
-
Either the
extraterrestrials have voluntarily stopped visiting us thanks to the
current nuclear military inactivity, our earlier activity thus
having drawn their attention,
-
or – the second hypothesis - it is
this very military activity that provoked the involuntary appearance
of UFOs in our skies!
Thus there would be an underlying physical law
linking nuclear tests and observations of UAP (Unidentified
Aerospatial Phenomena). This is just one of the innovative elements
provided by
The Science of the Extraterrestrials, which appeared in
July 2005. This work shows that these two hypotheses are but one and
the same.
It is because we disturb them that they come. But they appear
physically for the same reason that
makes them come. An atomic explosion is a foray into the space-time
continuum that they
occupy! Breaking an atomic nucleus means extracting the very many chronons existing below the threshold of the
chromodynamic scale
(study of the quarks of the nucleus). These chronons are
imperceptible at our scale of temporal flow but constitute the
framework of existence of the evolved extraterrestrials. Besides,
they have become ultraterrestrials – imperceptible in our space time
continuum – becoming extraterrestrials only when materializing!
Thus, nuclear explosions would produce sudden and undesired
materializations of extraterrestrial vessels as secondary effects!
It seems that these secondary effects are the achilles heel
of the
extraterrestrials and the argument for a global nuclear strategy
conducted by the U.S. superpower. This seems to set the conditions
for its protectorate against the extraterrestrials on a global
scale.
Before and After Atomic Weapons
A work that I warmly recommend for your attention is that of
Jean-Claude Sidoun. This book, OVNIS : Guerre froide « le grand jeu
» [UFOs: Cold War, “the great game”], describes brilliantly in 430
pages the context of nuclear armament and compares it with Ufological observations.
Jean-Claude Sidoun was one of the rare civilian investigators to
have participated in the activities of the GEPAN (Groupe d’Etude des
Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-identifiés), the predecessor of the
SEPRA. His work, well documented (close to 230 historical
references), demonstrates in a convincing fashion some essential
points:
• UFOs are not human technologies.
• They appeared massively with the nuclear era. • UFOs concentrate on strategic sites.
• A policy of disinformation is cleverly maintained in the USA, as
elsewhere. • The USA has constantly fed a global arms race by provoking
potential and actual conflicts. • This American military-industrial policy aims to maintain its
planetary domination. • Its ultimate goal is to confront an extraterrestrial threat,
imminent today.
The author wants to show thus that the “cold war,” which still
endures, is a pretext, by the overbidding that it entails in terms
of military investments, for the maintenance of Research and
Development in view of ending up at a global spatial defense against
the ETs. Sidoun reviews a series of Ufological cases arising during
the Second World War, before atomic weapons. There he describes
events outside the reach of human technical feats, even today. At
first impression, if the UFOs precede the nuclear era then there is
no direct link. In reality, the chronology of our temporal material
flow is not at all respected in the universe of quantum theory, of
which the scale involves precisely the chain reaction mechanisms of
the atomic nucleus.
Put otherwise, our future was the present of the
extraterrestrials in their space-time. This notion is largely
acknowledged even in special relativity theory. Thus, the few years
prior to the first human nuclear test underline the interest of the ETs in our evolution. But why would they suddenly become interested
in our presence on the battlefields of the Second World War, while
humanity has constantly known war everywhere on Earth, in every era,
without any sightings of UFOs? Why this sudden interest in our
survival? Can it really be a matter only of our survival when one
thinks of the innumerable genocides that humanity has known in
history without the intervention of ETs?
This question seems essential to us. Observations of UFOs were made
well before the middle of the 20th century. But, on the one hand,
the reports were extremely rare, and on the other hand, the pretext
of defense secrets could not be invoked in a civilization unaware of
the possibility of building airships. Put otherwise, every aerial
observation prior to the 20th century could be recorded by the
historians without affecting the sensitivity of the military
institutions. The extreme rarity of the observations thus was real.
Now, civilian aviation rapidly became military. Thus, the reports
originating from pilots or air
controllers during the second global conflict, in Europe (Germany)
as well as Asia (Japan), early
on were put under wraps in the national interest. Thus there were
many more observations after
the second half of the 20th century than there were official
reports. The nagging question was to
know which adversary had manufactured these unknown objects.
Yet,
the Foo Fighters (luminous balls) encountered in flight by war
pilots were not man made. Besides, it is remarkable that UFOs before
1945 were all, with some very rare exceptions, luminous appearances
and not objects! Appearance of material objects and atomic tests are
thus connected. A small digression is needed. It is stated by most
of us that the stars, and the sun in particular, experience
continuous thermonuclear explosions. In this case, our atomic tests
would seem benign with respect to stellar power. The truth is that
the thermonuclear activity of the stars is a hypothesis, nothing
more. An alternative has been proposed, that of the “cold sun,” or
rather of an “electromagnetic sun.”
One of the great enigmas to be
resolved is the very high temperature of the solar corona (several
million degrees at hundreds of thousands of miles from the surface),
in comparison with the surface temperature of 6000°K. The current
theory suggests the hottest temperature to be toward the heart and
not the periphery of the star. Thus, the thermonuclear argument
would no longer hold and then our atomic activity would become
remarkable in the galaxy.
The Nuclear Arms Race
The work of Jean-Claude Sidoun enlightens us on the successive
programs of nuclear militarization of the two great powers. The USA
and USSR both knew their own waves of UFO observations above their
respective strategic centers. If the dawn of
the UFO age were the
occasion for each to accuse the other of espionage, each rapidly
realized that no one on Earth had the technical capacity to
replicate with the astounding feats of UFOs.
We can hypothesize that the CIA was created in September 1947
principally to resolve this UFO
enigma and to proceed as a priority matter with “the potential
evaluation of the danger that could
be represented by flying saucers.”14 We see here that the
materialization of an UFO (they had
previously been only luminous) made the authorities fear a manifest
superiority on the part of
extraterrestrials.
Because at this time they had a ship and aliens
in their hands. Besides, it is
legitimate to ask why the director of the AMC (Air Material
Command), Lieutenant General
Nathan Twinning, is the one asked by his superior, General Georges Schulgen, for a
memorandum of recommendations.
Is Twinning not the one who is in
possession of an ET craft that is indeed physical, that is made of
aerial material? Was Twinning not the one who affirmed, “the
phenomena reported are real and not from the domain of fiction”? The
US Air Force has incessantly been helped in this by the CIA and even
by yet more secret agencies, in augmenting its military budget for
the purposes of developing arms capable of neutralizing these
incredible ships.
It is highly probable that the Pentagon, and in
particular those responsible for the military atomic program, have
come to understand the nuclear dimension of the UFO phenomenon. If
they did not necessarily destroy the ET ships, the nuclear
explosions seemed to possess one virtue: they materialized them!
In rendering visible the invisible, the US Air Force at least had
the advantage of specifying the threat in terms of the number of
observations. From there came the multiplication of atomic tests.
From there came the curve of radar/visual (UFOs materializing) cases
matching that of atomic tests. Thus maybe they multiplied the UFO
crashes, as may have been the case a year later in 1948 in Laredo,
Texas? Did this policy of evaluation of the extraterrestrial threat
have nuclear proliferation as a consequence? It is now clear that
the number of warheads greatly surpasses national needs. Let us see
that.
The United States military plans of 1945 known as ‘Charioteer’ and
‘Dropshot’ had as a goal militarily forcing the Soviet Union to its
knees by means of atomic bombardments.
These plans slightly preceded
the great waves of UFOs. It is remarkable to note that Charioteer
planned:
“in the course of the first month of the war 133 bombs on
70 Soviet cities. Then, in the course of the two following years 200
other atomic bombs and 250,000 tons of ordinary bombs.”
This plan
thus had as a goal the capitulation of the Bolshevik enemy. In
total, less than 350 nuclear bombs for the Eastern bloc! Moreover,
the bombs of 1945 reached at most 100 kilotons.
That is, 35 megatons dumped on the adversary. This figure is to be
compared to the current
260,000 megatons of potential destruction for only two nations! That
is, 4000 times the capacity
for destroying two subcontinents, one on each side of the old Iron
Curtain. Imagine an
overproduction of food 4000 times global needs. What to make of this
overproduction? Thus
such is the nuclear over-arming of planet Earth.
We are convinced from now on that this race for atomic weapons had
no other goal than to neutralize the potential extraterrestrial
enemy. In doing this, we have also given a pretext to
extraterrestrials to become the enemy. Maybe we have pushed them to
this extreme. Thus it seems that the abductions and the
hybridizations are the consequence of this policy of global over-arming intentionally instituted by the USA, in response to the
U.S. nuclear threat. The Balance of Terror was maintained by the
Nonproliferation Treaty of 1972 (SALT accords).
The USA disrupted
this balance with its NMD (National Missile Defense) program, since
become MD (Missile Defense), having as a strategy that is not
national but international, in accordance with bilateral defense
treaties between the USA and certain countries. In breaking this
fragile balance, the USA from that point on engages the other great
nations in a new arms race.
The cornerstone of MD, for which the 2002 budget was 7.5 billion
dollars, is the development of high-energy laser weapons. Two
versions of laser weapons embarked on are programmed: some Boeing
747-400s (Yal.1-ABL) and a network of “satellite-killer” satellites.
The United States military space budget would amount to 120 billion
dollars. Sidoun invites us to compare it to that of the Apollo
program (in current dollars): 25 billion dollars! By way of example,
the recent contract for about 100 Airbus craft going to China was
for about 9 billion dollars. Why so much money for the space weapons
of the armed forces?
The problem is to be found in the identification of the adversary.
Foreign Embassies have put
forth this strategy of U.S. overbidding because no Rogue State could
claim to pose a threat to the
U.S. military forces. Even China shows a monstrous military delay
compared to the USA. It has
but a few tens of nuclear warheads. Moreover, its equipment both
defensive and offensive is
aging. We know that Americans and Russians have collaborated on the
development of laser
weapons for twenty years. The question thus remains the same.
-
What
is this enemy that pushes
the Pentagon to claim ever more technologies, ever more military
power?
-
Why such eagerness to
ratify laser weapons tests as fast as possible for 2008 according to
the agenda reported by Sidoun?
We are a Nuclear Threat to Extraterrestrials
The year 2008 could be the start of a confrontation between humanity
and extraterrestrial races.
So many questions
that could be resolved only by a planetary becoming aware through
diplomatic means in the service of World Peace.
-
But who will take
this torch?
-
Toward whom will the eyes turn?
-
Who will the new human
diplomats be who will negotiate with the visitors from space?
-
What
is there to negotiate?
As we have seen, we are a threat to extraterrestrials and they are
not likely to accept the use of nuclear weapons. Any war that sparks
nuclear confrontation such as Iran might trigger an extraterrestrial
response against humanity that collectively threatens
extraterrestrial civilizations. Informed Ufologists may, with good
reason, wonder about the efficacy of laser weapons on ships that can
dematerialize themselves. Is the vocation of these weapons to fire
on targets that are numerous, moving, even elusive?
A series of
nuclear explosions in space could deal with this difficulty by
eliminating the furtiveness of the extraterrestrials. But to
overcome a shield, it is enough to multiply the number of swords.
Unless the sword is the invincible Excalibur. That is why certain
people think that the target is not the UFO but ... the asteroid!
Extraterrestrials capable of so many exploits must surely have the
power to divert a celestial body toward Earth as predicted by so
many prophets and described by
Immanuel Velikovsky. Is this how
extraterrestrials will respond to the threat posed by humanity’s use
of nuclear weapons?
ENDNOTES
1 Edward J. Ruppelt, The Report
on Unidentified Flying Objects , ch 16.
2 Laurent Gonin, cited in Jean-Jacques Velasco and Nicolas
Montigiani, OVNI, l’évidence (Carnot Editions, 2004).
3 “The General Twining Letter,”
http://www.roswellfiles.com/Articles/twining.htm
4 George F. Schulgen Memorandum to FBI Liaison Section.
September 5, 1947. Cited in:
http://www.ufoscience.org/history/swords.pdf
5 Eric Julien, La Science des Extraterrestres (JMG Editions,
2005).
6 France’s most popular scientific magazine,
http://www.larecherche.fr
7 See Eric Julien, "The SEPRA, civil or military?"
8 See Eric Julien, "The SEPRA, civil or military?"
9 Velasco & Montigiani, OVNI, l’évidence, 159
10 Sidoun, Ovnis: Guerre froide “le grand jeu” (JMG
Editions, 2005) 127.
11 OVNI, l’évidence, 158.
12 Velasco and Nicolas Montigiani, OVNI, l’évidence, 159.
13 Ryan Wood, Majic Eyes Only: Earth’s Encounters with
Extraterrestrial Technology (Wood Enterprises 2005).
14 Sidoun, Ovnis: Guerre froide “le grand jeu,” 77.
|