Part III
by Eric Julien
MAY 3, 2006
from
SaveLivesInMay Website
This is the third article on my prediction of huge tsunami in the
Atlantic Ocean on MAY 25, 2006. It aims first of all at safeguarding
the lives of the coastal populations around the Atlantic Ocean where
a fragment from comet SW-3 will impact, involving a brutal awakening
of underwater volcanoes.
We will reveal aspects which were not covered, until now, in the
preceding articles – namely, the direct and indirect incidences of
the impact of a comet fragment. We will highlight, in a forthcoming
article, the major reasons (beyond natural appearances) which may
generate this major catastrophe so that, in the immediate future, we
may manifest our collective destiny as well as possible. Of course,
I will approach the concrete consequences for the populations.
Let us initially point out the essential facts which pushed me to
spend a very great amount of energy to communicate with the public
on this future event, considering that I’ve earnestly made
affirmations that we are protected from the main comet fragments.
Last April 7th, I received the telepathic message of
extraterrestrial entities indicating that the vision of a giant
tsunami received three years earlier was going to occur on MAY 25,
2006. I then learned of the existence of a fragmented comet, which
not only passed more closer to Earth in MAY 2006, but which was to
pass through the ecliptic plane on MAY 25! I have the retrospective
proof of my vision substantiated by the registered copyright of my
second book [1] who presents it.
It’s a one-in-a-million chance that such a fortuitous “coincidence”
took place! Similarly, it is more “improbable” that my contacts had
also given me the information on the earthquake of Bam in Iran at
the end of 2003. Furthermore, the principles of the
Science of the
Extraterrestrials [2], having been accepted by many scientists,
also allowed them the incredible exploits by hundreds observing
thousands of UFO in the past. Additionally, since my first article
on this event, I have received many testimonies of people having had
the same vision of giant waves in the Atlantic, particularly for the
end of MAY 2006.
Therefore, I invite each one to request for a happy end, to
visualize a future free from misfortunes. By doing this, I’m acting
on my affirmation. It is necessary for all to warn our
fellow-citizens about the risk of large wave - possibly 200 meters
in the most exposed areas - around May 25, 2006 (the Ascension Day
for Christians). The majority of them are precisely around the
Atlantic. By chance?
To avoid any panic by relying on the assumption of timely,
forthcoming alert, the precautions to be taken are very simple: Move
away from the coasts and to go up on the heights sufficiently early,
and even the day before. Remember that those which declare that no
impact will occur on May 25, 2006 will not be there to provide you
shelter at the proper time, nor your beloved ones. You will be
surprised, alone and without help from them. Warn people around you.
Save lives at the end of May 2006!
It is not “The End Of The World!” being considered here. It is only
an application of PRUDENCE regarding the potential of a major
catastrophe of which we must minimize the effects on the lives that
are at risk.
Some reminders
Astronomers are informed of the existence of a certain number of
comet fragments but are technically incapable of counting them all.
A great number of them could drastically threaten the Earth without
ANYBODY knowing anything about it until a few days, or even hours
before impact. This is an irrefutable scientific fact!
One will be able to confuse you with statistical conjectures about
the probability of such an event, but in the balance, the factors
will equally bear the same weight as the opposing assumptions. It is
a scientific fact, especially considering the crash landing of two
space shuttles was a scientific fact. They belonged to NASA, which
implies that previously withheld vital information on this comet of
was used to support claims that the comet fragments do not represent
a danger. In statistical terms, two out of four represents a 50%
error in accuracy by NASA. Historical patterns support this
conclusion.
Astronomers remembered the asteroid 2002 MN, a hundred meters wide,
which they could detect only AFTER it had passed within less 120,000
kilometers of Earth, a third of the distance between the Earth and
the Moon. Also, let’s speak about 2004 FH, about 30 m in diameter,
located only three days before it passed to 43,000 kilometers of our
planet. These are FACTS.
Similarly, NO ONE on this planet understands the reasons of the
fragmentation of the comet 73P/SW-3 in 1995 in the first place! I
still consider the relevance of the two crop circles of
extraordinary importance for our common destiny that appeared two
months later. Let’s initially recall that a crop circle called
"galaxy" had forewarned, only five years earlier, one of the
greatest solar flare periods of our history. This suggests that the
authors of this geometric language, the extraterrestrials, have the
capacity to travel in or envision the future. The crop circles of
which I speak, "Asteroid" and "Missing Earth", were adequately
detailed in
my preceding article. Let us suggest that these are
proof that these advanced intelligences, cloaked behind the event of
MAY 25 2006, have envisaged, and caused, long in advance, the
scenario that proceeds in this event.
"Missing Earth"
"Asteroid"
After a long period of cold war between extraterrestrial and human,
concurrently evidenced by abductions and nuclear tests comes a
precursor, what is more accurately called the Apocalypse (i.e. the
Revelation of their existence in the world), generated by a
“premeditated” major catastrophe. This upheaval does not constitute
the end of the world but is a warning intended to prohibit the use
of our nuclear weapons (which attack them in their plane of
existence).
Works of an Italian physicist
[3], Giorgio Fontana,
offers precise conclusions in support of the scientific contribution
(Absolute Relativity) by my extraterrestrial contacts (Science of
the Extraterrestrials [4]), who wrote to me recently:
"Absolute Relativity is a
real variant of Special Relativity!!!
(...) It may happen that the effect of nuclear explosions can affect
millions of parallel worlds, which we cannot see."
There are two extraterrestrial factions. One of them is opposed to
this cometary striking. It is that which I consider by ethical
principle. An image [5] synthesizes the normal path of this comet,
fragmented in 1995 in an unexplainable way.
The figures hereafter point out the conditions of approach of the
fragments of the comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3, being concurrent
with this article are already 61.
These figures result from the data
obtained by the site of the Near Earth Object Program
[6] within
NASA.
The representation above is a "photograph" provided May 14, 2006, a
date on which the most important fragments, whose fragment B
indicated here, gain critical global attention for astronomical
projections regarding their proximity to the Earth (red circle).
This second illustration above, shows the relative “top view” position of
the fragments. We clearly see that the orange trajectory of one
“identified” comet fragment, unobservable at the moment, is
perfectly between the most extreme parameters (trajectories of the
fragments Y and S).
The perspective of the same fragments above implies a weak angular
difference between the “officially” located fragments and another
possible deviation in fragment trajectory. Below, the figure
represents the orientation of the comet tail compared to the
trajectory of the core (fragment B and C mainly).
This orientation
is primarily due to solar wind. In the case of SW-3, the tail will
be also made up of abnormally large fragments. The Earth will cross
this tail approximately MAY 24, 2006. The risks of MAY 25 are
substantial.
A deep study on comet SW-3 was published... one year ago, in May
2005 [7]. It shows that the Earth would be swept by a meteor
shower in May 2006 named Tau Herculids, precisely coming from comet
SW-3. Many comets have a long plume that the sun creates or
facilitates.
This plume widens under, more or less, due to strong
influence of the gravitation of other planets, in particular,
Jupiter, which is the largest planet of the solar system.
Originally, it appeared that the comet had a size of 1.5 kilometers.
The study estimates 64,000 small pieces were released by SW-3!
|
1 AU = 1
Astronomical
Unit = 149,597,871
kilometers
Additional Notes: the orbits
shown in the applet are color coded.
The planets are white lines, and the
asteroid/comet is a blue line. The
bright white line indicates the
portion of the orbit that is above
the ecliptic plane, and the darker
portion is below the ecliptic plane.
Likewise for the asteroid/comet
orbit, the light blue indicates the
portion above the ecliptic plane,
and the dark blue the portion below
the ecliptic plane.
Orbit
Viewer applet originally written and
kindly provided by
Osamu Ajiki
(AstroArts), and further modified by
Ron Baalke
(JPL). |
|
|
However, between the end of 2002 and mid-2003, when
SW-3 had its
slowest speed, Jupiter and Saturn influenced the previously
fragmented comet. The relative positions of these planets tended to
cause the fragments to deviate towards the outside of the elliptic
orbit of the comet. In other words, this gravitational action
strongly supported trajectories of collision with the Earth.
Knowing that speeds of ejection can reach a hundred meters a second
due to the exceptional outburst which SW-3 experienced, one can
imagine that fragments are very dispersed. For example, the ejection
speed of 30 meters a second, due to the worsening gravitational
influence evidenced above since the beginning of the fragmentation
of SW-3, represents more than 10 million kilometers between the main
core and ejected fragments. The principal fragments will pass
between 9 and 12 million kilometers of us. This results in our being
exactly in the middle of the meteor cloud!
In spite of the empirical data provided in the aforementioned study,
calculated by a Gaussian distribution of the fragments around the
principal core, many unknown factors remain, particularly the
fragmentation of SW-3. Fragment S is an obvious example. All the
scientific debate about the collision, pro and con, of a fragment
with the Earth comes from primitive evaluations, as the study
referred to above reveals. In short, my critics assure safety,
bolstered by press releases, predicated upon a hypothesis eclipsed
by an enormous unknown factor that they prefer to evade.
This unknown factor is extraterrestrial intervention. Of course, no astro-mathematical model applies to extraterrestrial intervention!
This is what I recently explained to a physicist who clings to
Newtonian Physics. The safety of millions of people rests in the
hands of very questionable theoretical study based on a traditional
model for ejection of comet fragments whereas the original
circumstances of these ejections were not traditional.
Regardless of counterclaims, accelerated fragmentations of B and G
at the end of April 2006 has startled astronomers. It gets even
better, NASA’s deceiving “short-sightedness” was revealed in
"convenient” updating of data! More than disconcerting, it is highly
suspect. NASA’s press release on my collision alert of May 25, 2006
was disseminated on an international scale, after my interview had
taken place on April 24 on the main stream Coast to Coast AM radio
show with George Noory, NASA sent out a press release on April 27th
reassuring the public about the unpredictable character of this
comet. It directly coincided with my prediction! It was not
uplifting for me, but instilled greater doubt and distrust. I
benefited by checking the data of the fragments on NASA’s Near Earth
Object Program after Elder Hale informed me that George Noory had
expressed new concerns during a later broadcast which referenced
NASA’s Near Earth Object Program, revealing new, disconcerting data.
“Imagine my surprise” - of course I expected the news about fragment
S, having previously emphasized its dangerously abnormal character.
NASA’s auspicious press release served to increase support my recent
warnings. And not just a little: More than 1.5 million kilometers!
This suggested to me that this could be expected, so I later checked
NASA’s belated data on fragments M, N, P, Q, and R at the same time
as the fragment S, referenced March 24th - No notable change!
Happily, I kept the proof of this likely deception, as illustrated
by the figure of the fragment S below. It will probably remain
archived.
One sees well in bottom on the left a distance of
0,0497
Astronomical Unit. Today, it is around 0.0750 AU, that is to say
close to 1.5 million kilometers of additional distance according to
NASA’s spurious distortion of astrophysics. Two assumptions: Either
it is an error which one corrected, (and that means that NASA can
still make errors) or, NASA’s uncertain! The assertions of NASA on
April 27th were premature at best.
Either there is INFORMATION HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC in connection
with certain fragments, or it is even more serious! In both cases,
my vision seriously gains credit from a purely scientific point of
view. The continuation will confirm it.
Still recently (checked at the date of this article), extremely
curious data appeared on the table of short distances objects of the
Near Earth Object Program [8]:
The posted distances are 0.04 Lunar Distance or 0.00010 Astronomical
Unit. This fragment SW-3BD would thus pass infinitely closer than
the other fragments hitherto identified, since it should be at the
date of MAY 11, 2006, with the third of the distance Earth - Moon.
Two details raise the doubt. It appears with the first line on a
list of 70 heavenly objects to be noticed! Particularly, it will
pass to 21h53 (2+1+5+3=11) more or less 11H11.
This last figure is
esoterically known to imply “synchronicity”. It would appear that
the person who wrote the data within NASA’s Near Earth Object
Program wants to “reveal” a message to the world saying:
"It is a
deliberate error exposing that this table is false!".
If it is
false, my hypothesis is plausible, and especially the worst of it.
Impact in the
Atlantic
In the images below, I endeavored to visualize the trajectory of a
hypothetical piece of comet. By doing this, I wanted to check if my
vision of eruption of underwater volcanoes, after noon, in the
middle of the Atlantic Ocean, and close to the tropic of Cancer,
corresponded to the available scientific data. Then I reproduced the
spinning angle of the Earth coinciding to the most probable
trajectory of a fragment in direction of the Earth.
Visualizing that night has just fallen in Western Africa, the
trajectory of the fragment would be precisely the middle of the
Atlantic Ocean, close to the tropic of Cancer! Of course, the
precision of the point of impact is impossible to determine in the
current state of the available data (until the last moment). The
remarkable fact is that the conjunction of the slopes (Earth + comet
fragment) significantly substantiates my vision.
However, we cannot
confirm that it is the Atlantic Ocean which will face the fragment
supposed to strike us, presently. A thing is certain: The fragment,
attracted by terrestrial gravity (represented by a cone in the
images below) will fall close to the tropic of Cancer! Its
trajectory will pass by the center of the Earth as the laws of the
gravitation require it. The direction of the movement of the
celestial bodies in the figures below go from right-hand side and to
the left, upwards.
The trajectory of the fragment in the shape of cone crosses the
ecliptic plane of the Earth, on the trajectory of the latter, at the
time when our planet is there.
The purple line represents the trajectory of the Earth around the
sun, which is virtually behind us (on the first image above). The
yellow trajectory is that of the collision fragment. One sees, in
contrast, the ecliptic plane.
One of the obvious aspects is that this cometary trajectory is
direct, i.e. almost perpendicular to the surface of the Earth,
implying minimal breaking through the atmosphere, and continuing
through the ocean before running up against the ocean bottom. Its
energy will be enormous.
In comparison to the last images, the concentric wave may not be
exclusively generated directly by the impact of the cometary
fragment, but by the explosive eruption of underwater volcanoes on
the mid-Atlantic dorsal having suffered the shock wave of the cometary fragment. It may be that a
long period exists between
impact and eruption, even one day or two. It was the case for the
tsunami of Sumatra. Seven days before an asteroid hit Indonesia. In
addition, the moon will be between Earth and Sun, attracting
strongly the magma in the upper areas.
This configuration was seen
in different major catastrophes like the Sumatra, Iran and
San
Francisco big earthquakes. Remember that the last eclipse occurred
in the Atlantic Ocean MARCH 29, 2006! Just two months before the
event, i.e. the same time between the “Missing Earth” crop circle
appearance and the SW-3 fragmentation.
The concentric circle causing the tsunami enlarges in a predictable
way, but calculate the distance of the huge wave towards the
African, American, and European coasts. On the day side, in South
America, Central America and North America, the inhabitants will see
the wave arriving.
But in Africa, as in Europe, it will grow dark.
It is even probable that the tsunami will touch the French and
British coasts on MAY 26, 2006 a little after midnight. Let us
remember that the tsunami of Sumatra took 220,000 victims in 11
nations. Calculations suggest 58 million victims in around fifty
countries.
In the table [9] below, we can evaluate the
power of a comet
fragment according to its size.
The fragment should produce the minimum of one megaton (that is to
say 50 times Hiroshima atomic explosion), producing 10 megatons (500
times Hiroshima) and causing a very great seismic reading at a
magnitude between 8 and 9. But the true danger comes from the unique
configuration of the mid-Atlantic dorsal. Indeed, it is the zone of
the world where the magma is the closest to the Earth’s crust.
In
other words, any shock wave will produce a compression of the magma,
which under the intense pressure, will explode with an enormous
outburst. This vertical plunge will involve moisture above the
surface of the ocean if the ocean floor relatively close to the
ocean surface, producing an explosion similar to a spark-ignition
engine which violently pushes back the piston by the expansion of
gases.
It is auspicious to note that the Tropic of Cancer (located at 23°
Northern), where the comet fragment would likely strike the ocean,
is not very far from a particular site: Lost City on the Atlantis
fault. In addition to the particularity of this mythical name
(Atlantis), and of this unusually auspicious location (Lost City),
this point is only 700 meters in depth! A comet fragment striking at
the mid-Atlantic dorsal with a sufficient energy could awaken the
chain of the underwater volcanoes there. Hardly 600 kilometers
separate Lost City from the tropic of Cancer. In other words, it’s a
very tender zone for an impact.
The mid-Atlantic dorsal is a long line of mountains extending 65,000
kilometers and composed of very many volcanoes. The more closer to
surface, the more explosive the eruption that will produce
spectacular effects, especially near the Lost City, a site
discovered very recently (2001), not very deep (700 m), and which
offers a particularly unique geochemical anomaly, according to data
completed by IFREMER at the time of the EXOMAR marine exploration.
It is speculative to predict that the comet fragment will fall
precisely near the Atlantis fault [10]. Nevertheless, this
probability is far from being null and is very likely to occur if
the volcanoes are significantly shaken in order to activate them as
my vision suggested.
There exists more than 300,000 underwater
volcanoes on Earth, including one substantial part on this dorsal.
The precision of the impact is not imperative to create substantial
waves, though extremely likely as several volcanoes will be become
active the same day, creating a series of waves.
The figures above and below show the continental shelves bordering
the emerged crusts in light colours. They will escalate the waves
approaching the coasts.
A cursory investigation gives rise to a certainty of the most
probable scenario. Accordingly, the meteorite fragment considered in
the event of MAY 25, 2006 will strike the mid-Atlantic dorsal, but
will not be able, in any case, to generate, by impact alone, the
giant tsunami in my vision. It remains that it is likely that no one
locally will see the fragment striking ground since it will fall
into an oceanic desert.
The huge wave could be only the product of
an explosive eruption of one or more underwater volcanoes, which
under the enormous pressure exerted by the shock wave of the
fragment will expel a great quantity of lava upwards and creating a
rise in ocean water, as well as a correlative depression.
The waves of tsunami are propagated out of deep water with a speed
which can exceed 800 km/h [11]. Their wavelength from peak to peak
goes from several tens to several hundreds of kilometers and a wave
height from a few centimeters to several centimeters, so that they
are undetectable on board boats. When they reach shallow depths, the
waves are slowed down, which causes the formation of a destroying
"wall". A wave of one meter can then become a 16 meter wave.
According to the
site Futura-Science,
"25 Member States take part in
the alarm system to the tsunami (T.W.S. = Tsunami Warning System) in
the Pacific, which supervises the seismic and maregraphic stations
distributed in the Pacific Ocean in order to evaluate the potentials
tsunamigenic of the seisms and to diffuse alarm with the tsunami".
In other words, we do not have ANY MONITORING for the Atlantic
Ocean. The times of alarm will be reduced to very little time. As I
indicated it in a previous article, only MEASUREMENTS OF PRECAUTION
- to move away from the coasts or to go up on the heights - BEFORE
the EVENT will allow to save lives.
The last largest tsunami which caused a quantity of casualties and
damage throughout the Pacific was generated by a seism located at
the broadening of the Chilean coast in 1960.
This tsunami caused
human and material devastations not only on the coasts of Chile, but
also with Hawaii and further still in Japan. We see above the time
lines, i.e. the position of the wave according to previous time.
The figure above shows the relation existing between the depth of
the oceanic bottom, the speed of the wave, and its size. A wave
slows down with the approach to the coasts, but, and that is quite
disturbing, grows enormously bigger while arriving on the coastline.
That means clearly that only a preventive alarm for MAY 25, 2006
will come from the measurement of a seism whose epicenter will be
located on the Atlantic dorsal, EVEN IF THE SEISM IS APPARENTLY
WEAK.
What could cause the tsunami could be the eruption itself, and not
the wave of the seism. The tragic irony of this is that the
International Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, subservient to its
Member States, begins its FIRST TEST OF TSUNAMI ALARM... in the
Pacific: Pacific Wave 06. This test, meeting the requirements to
evaluate the reactivity of those countries, will take place on MAY
16, 2006, the period of the closest passage of comet SW3. The
commission reminds us: "It will be clearly indicated that it is a
test and not a real alarm".
Alarm will be given by the location at Hawaii. (It is precisely
where I live!) In addition, the exact day when I finished this
article, a REAL SEISM OCCURRED IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN, with a real
tsunami! It is PRUDENT to pay attention to the indicator signs and
go ahead with precautions. I believe that fate is made of very
“synchronistic” signs.
The images below summarize the probable scenario of the tsunami in
the ATLANTIC that I predict.
Although diagrammatic, these figures describe the specificity of the
event. To create waves of 200 meters on the coasts, a wave located
in the middle of the ocean should be enough. The impact need not be
very powerful. Indeed, the shallowness of the Earth’s crust will
easily transmit the shock wave of the cometary fragment to the
magma, which under the combined effect of the shock wave and the
displacement of the weak mountainous buttress, will be crushed in
its housing.
Afterwards, by excessive pressure, a violent magmatic
explosion will open the mountain and expunge the lava at very high
speeds towards oceanic surface. An enormous wave will be formed.
A research shows, indeed, that the volcanism of a dorsal,
particularly in the central rift, is very close to the broad
magmatic pockets, where the mantle is partially fused
[12]. In
other words, a sufficiently severe shock wave would be capable of
generating a chain reaction.
The explosion of the Mount St. Helens
in the USA in 1980 was equivalent to 27,000 atomic bombs. Krakatoa
projected 50 million tons of ashes in the atmosphere in 1883. In
February 1953, a major eruption of an underwater volcano,
accompanied by pyroclastic bursts, a hundred meters high, near the
Lopévi islands [13] in the Pacific was reported.
The French site Futura-Sciences
[14] indicates that,
"the tsunamis, called sometimes
seismic oceanic waves or incorrectly
tidal waves are generated mainly by seisms, sometimes by underwater
landslides, more rarely by volcanic eruptions and exceptionally by
the impact of a large meteorite in the ocean. The underwater
volcanic eruptions can produce really impressive waves of tsunami.
The great eruption of the Krakatoa volcano in 1883 have generated
gigantic waves reaching 40 meters above the sea level, killing out
of the thousands of people and devastating many coastal villages".
A second phenomenon will make the situation quite worse. The
awakening of the underwater volcanoes will inevitably be accompanied
by a great earthquake, perhaps about 8 or 9 on the Richter scale.
This earthquake will inevitably have many counterparts. It will
create other seisms in extremely distant areas. Very recently,
Russia and South America experienced two great seisms in the
magnitude of 7-8 on the Richter scale. But we are likely to
experience what is called a "tsunami earthquake," i.e. a seism which
produces an abnormally powerful tsunami compared to the magnitude of
the seism.
The "tsunami earthquakes" are characterized by ripples from far
ocean bottoms, faults of a few meters and smaller fault surfaces in
comparison with a traditional seism. They are also slow seisms with
a slip along the fault below the underwater bottom slower than at
the time of a traditional seism. Two other catastrophic tsunamis
originating from a "tsunami earthquake" took place in
Java in
Indonesia (on June 2, 1994) and in Peru (on February 21, 1996). The
Atlantic dorsal very regularly experiences weak earthquakes. One
sees on the image below this characteristic pattern
[15].
This next seism in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean will probably be
contagious, and will affect the whole of the dorsal, in particular
the zone of the Azores [16]. But this seismic activity could also
shake the zone of the Canaries, that which researchers of Benfield
Hazard Research Center studied carefully.
It could cause a very
large wave, due to the collapse of a whole side of the Mt. La Palma
. The height of the wave created depends on many parameters. It
could, in the worst case scenario, reach 600 meters when arriving on
the shores.
One clearly sees by the figures above that the giant tsunami
[17] would
reach the coasts of the American continent in six hours. But in the
case of an underwater volcanic eruption, this time is reduced to
approximately three to four hours. In my next article I will focus
on what it is advisable to do to protect oneself according to the
zones and countries.
References
[1] Enfants des Etoiles, Eric Julien, Editions JMG, Avril 2006.
English re-editing, Elder Hale [2] La Science des Extraterrestres, Eric Julien, Editions JMG,
Juillet 2005. [3]
http://www.ing.unitn.it/~fontana/
[4] http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0410054 et
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0511157
[5] La Science des Extraterrestres, Eric Julien, Editions JMG,
Juillet 2005. [6]
http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay/img_display.php?pic=060414_comet_map_02.jpg&cap=Sky+Map%3A+The+positions+of+comet+SW-3+at+one-week+intervals+as+of+1+a.m.+local+time+from+mid-northern+latitudes
[7]
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db_shm?sstr=73P
[8]
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.361..638W
[9]
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/neo_ca?type=NEO;hmax=all;tlim=recent_future;dmax=0.1AU;max_rows=200;action=Display
Table;show=1&sort=dist_min&sdir=ASC [10]
http://astrosurf.com/macombes/tableau 4-2.htm [11]
http://www.ifremer.fr/
[12]
http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/dossier514-2.php
[13]
http://www.ggl.ulaval.ca/personnel/bourque/s1/volcans.html
[14]
http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/dossier473-8.php
[15]
http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/dossier514-3.php
[16]
http://www-sdt.univ-brest.fr
[17]
http://www.benfieldhrc.org/tsunamis
|