by Michael E. Salla, PhD
September 11, 2006
On the fifth anniversary of the ‘9-11’ attacks, more
citizens than ever before are questioning official versions of the
attacks and the adequacy of the 9-11 Commission Report.
According to an August 2006 Scripps Howard/Ohio University national
survey, 36% of Americans believe 9-11 was an ‘inside job’
with government agencies complicit in what occurred. A Zogby poll
in May 2006 found that 42% of Americans believed that official
explanations and the 9-11 Commission were covering up the truth.
There has been a steady stream of
authors, journalists, researchers and media personalities coming
forward to declare that 9-11 was an ‘inside job’. Some of the more
prominent include the theologian Dr David Ray Griffin
author/editor of a number of books on 9-11 including 9/11 and
American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out (2003), Michael
Ruppert author of Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the
American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil (2004), and actor
Charlie Sheen who went public with his views on March
Finally, a website was recently created
by a committee of scholars criticizing official explanations and
also arguing that 9-11 was an ‘inside job’.
With the ever growing number of those claiming 9-11 was an inside
job and that there was an official cover up, it comes as no surprise
that many now view the 9-11 attacks as part of an historical pattern
of governments using ‘false flag’ operations to overcome opposition
to their policy objectives. A false flag operation is best
described as a covert operation conducted by “governments,
corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear
as if they are being carried out by other entities.”
An increasing number of books and videos are now discussing historic
false flag operations in relation to 9-11. The more prominent
include David Griffin’s, The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing
Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004);
Barrie Zwicker’s more recent, Towers of Deception: The Media
Cover-up of 9/11 (2006); and Alex Jones recent video,
TERRORSTORM: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism (2006).
Griffin, Zwicker and
Jones examine historic 'false flag' operation to present the
historical context for analysis of events surrounding 9-11 and the
contrived “war on terror”. In historic ‘false flag’ operations such
as the burning of the Reichstag in 1933, the 1953 Iranian
coup, the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964, intelligence
operatives from governments staged events that would be blamed on
targeted groups in a way that would facilitate government polices to
increase their power or topple foreign governments. More
controversially, Griffin argues that the 1941 Pearl Harbor
attack was a false flag operation and that this demonstrates the
magnitude to which false flag operations can be conducted.
Zwicker and Jones discuss how the Nazis directly
benefited by covertly orchestrating the burning of the Reichstag
and blaming it on communists. Similarly, they describe how US and
British policies directly benefited by false flag operations aimed
at the popular nationalist Prime Minister of Iran, Muhammad
Mossadeq, who was accused of pro-communist sympathies. This led
to a coup in 1953 whereby the Shah of Iran was able to assume
dictatorial powers that reversed the controversial nationalization
policies of Mossadeq.
The 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident
according to Zwicker, Jones and Griffin was another false flag
operation whereby communist North Vietnam was blamed for two attacks
on US warships. Documents later released conclusively showed that
the second attack never occurred. They also describe failed
false flag incidents such as the attack on the USS Liberty by the
Israeli Airforce in 1967 during the six day war. They claim that the
sinking of the Liberty would have put great pressure on the US to
enter the war in support of Israel which planned to shift
responsibility to Egypt.
Griffin, Zwicker, and Jones have all cited
the Operation Northwoods documents that showed the Joint Chiefs
of Staff had approved false flag operations in the early 1960s that
involved terrorist attacks against American infrastructure and even
cities. These covert actions would have been blamed on Cuba and used
to justify a military invasion but were never approved by the
Kennedy administration (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/).
Griffin, Zwicker and Jones use this and other cases as evidence that
false flag operations have a long history in the covert actions of
many governments including the US.
Having persuasively presented evidence that governments have in the
past used false flag operations, Griffin, Zwicker and Jones turn
their attention to the 9-11 attack; and, to varying degrees, a
number of other ‘terrorist attacks’ in Britain, Spain and Bali. In
all these cases, Griffin, Zwicker and Jones present evidence that
these were false flag operations.
They cite historic documents, interview
whistleblowers, identify inconsistencies in official versions, and
circumstantial evidence that all point to these recent terrorist
attacks being false flag operations. In terms of the 9-11 attack in
the US and the July 7, 2005 (7-7) attack in Britain, they examine
security drills that led to much confusion on the part of security
forces that permitted security lapses that may have allowed the
attacks to occur.
Zwicker and Jones argue
that such drills are a characteristic of false flag operations
where it is critical to have security forces not involved in such
covert operations stand down. They present persuasive evidence that
the war on terror is contrived with the goal of depriving citizens
in the US and western democracies of their civil liberties, and to
neutralize domestic opposition to the war in Iraq.
Who was really
behind 9-11 and other terrorist attacks, and why?
With regard to the question of who was really behind 9-11 and
other terrorist attacks, a number of 9-11 authors provide what they
believe to be the real factors driving the contrived war on
terrorism. To facilitate this study, I will concentrate on four that
represent the major thrust of 9-11 arguments: Griffin,
Zwicker, Jones, and Ruppert, and simply refer to
them collectively as the 9-11 authors.
To varying degrees the 9-11 authors
point to efforts led by the US and Britain to capture the oil
resources of 'rogue nations' such as Iraq in order to gain
control of the oil industry. By capturing Iraq, driving oil prices
up, corporate interests in the US and Britain stand to make enormous
short term profits. As the supply of oil reaches peak production, an
idea most strongly championed by Michael Ruppert, this
ensures that US/British corporate interests are in the
driver’s seat for benefiting in the long term from skyrocketing oil
prices as industrializing nations such as India and China generate
increasing demand for oil.
Control over the vital oil industry
would therefore enable US corporate dominance in global financial
markets well into the next generation. This would make China and
India, potential future competitors to US global dominance, more
subservient to US policies.
The 9-11 authors argue that it is not just oil interests
seeking to benefit from wars in Iraq, but also the armaments
industries in the US which are by far the world’s largest weapons
suppliers. Essentially, US corporate contractors need a contrived
war on terrorism to continue to sell their military products to the
Pentagon which needs to conduct punitive missions against rogue
nations. The ultimate rationale for the arms industry is driven by
corporate greed to take advantage of security threats to
maintain a perpetual war economy that is funded at the expense of
the ordinary tax payer.
Eisenhower’s famous farewell address warning
of the dangers of the military-industrial complex is most commonly
cited as evidence of such a danger.
In addition to US financial dominance and corporate greed, the 9-11
authors offer their ultimate rationale for the contrived war on
terrorism. This is the theory of Pax Americana that what drives US
policy is the need to establish US hegemony around the planet.
Griffin, Jones, Ruppelt and Zwicker argue that by
administration claiming that 'rogue states' are 'harboring
terrorists', and developing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) that
would be given to the terrorists, the US has the rationale to launch
preemptive wars and establish control over nations opposed to US
They cite neo-conservative figures
associated with the New American Century Project as exponents of
this imperialist agenda to establish US global dominance.
Consequently, the war on Iraq was justified using the WMD thesis
that Saddam Hussein was allied with terrorist groups that he would
have used as proxies to launch such weapons on the US. While US
global hegemony would be justified on the need to make the world
safe for democracy, the true rationale according to 9-11 authors is
to make the world profitable for key US corporations allied with the
oil and armaments industries.
The assessments of the 9-11 authors of false flag operations as
being rooted in the greed of the oil and armaments industries, and
the imperialist designs of neo-conservatives continues to attract
much support from many disenchanted with official explanations for
terrorist attacks on the US and Britain; the spinning of the
intelligence data used to justify the war on Iraq; and the enormous
profits generated by corporations involved in the oil and armaments
In particular, Griffin’s, Zwicker’s and
Jones’ analysis of false flag operations is helpful in identifying
the catalyst for government policies that result in diminished civil
liberties and dampen domestic opposition to preemptive wars
ostensibly aimed to "protect democracy", but which provide windfall
profits for large US corporations. The 9-11 authors analyses
focusing on US imperialism helps identify the enormous influence of
neo-conservatives in the Bush administration in dictating official
There is however a missing factor in the
analyses of the 9-11 authors focusing on the trifecta of the oil
industry, the military-industrial complex, and US imperialism. A
factor that provides a deeper level of analysis for what is really
driving US policies in the Middle East and elsewhere around the
planet. The 9-11 authors are missing the exopolitical factor.
the Exopolitical Perspective
Exopolitics is based on extensive evidence that extraterrestrial
civilizations are visiting the Earth and that this evidence is
systematically covered up by both government agencies and military
departments in the US and other major nations in what has been
described as a “Cosmic Watergate”.
The mainstream scientific view that the
speed of light presents and insurmountable obstacle to the physical
presence of extraterrestrial visitors has been increasingly
challenged by new theories concerning faster than light speed
Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of
Scientific Revolutions (1962) suggests that our understanding of
science periodically undergoes a paradigm shift. Exopolitics
represents a paradigm shift in political thinking about the
underlying forces driving domestic and international affairs.
Not only is evidence of extraterrestrial visitation in the
contemporary era being covered up; but, perhaps more significantly,
evidence of an historic extraterrestrial presence that has sponsored
past human civilizations is also covered up. This means that both
knowledge and technology of extraterrestrials currently visiting
the Earth, and historic
evidence of earlier extraterrestrial
visitations, have become paramount national security concerns that
are kept hidden from the general public.
The true extent of the national security
implications concerning public disclosure of an extraterrestrial
presence is revealed in a
Brookings Institute study for NASA in 1960
claiming that public discovery of an extraterrestrial intelligence
could lead to the collapse of Western civilization.
The impact of an extraterrestrial
presence and its implications for politics, science, economy and
culture, could very quickly lead to a collapse of vital institutions
for every country on the planet thereby threatening the sovereignty
of major nations. Furthermore, according to a number of former
military whistleblowers, UFOs have disabled or destroyed US nuclear
missiles on a number of occasions.
This partly reveals the secret concern
of policy makers over extraterrestrial visitors. In short, the
national security implications of an extraterrestrial presence
trumps every other national security issue, and is the Rosetta Stone
for understanding the true dynamics underlying global politics and
Evidence for the cover-up of an extraterrestrial presence is
extensive and persuasive. Hundreds of credible whistleblowers have
emerged from the military, government and corporate sectors to
describe the cover up various aspects of UFOs and the
extraterrestrial hypothesis. The testimonies of many of these
government whistleblowers are available through private
organizations such as
the Disclosure Project.
Furthermore, leaked classified documents
have disclosed critical features of the national security system
created to deal with the extraterrestrial presence. Many of these
documents are available through the popular “Majestic Documents”
Numerous websites, books and
organizations have presented the evidence and testimonies of
thousands of witnesses, ‘experiencers’, researchers and
whistleblowers revealing the extent of extraterrestrial visitation
The 9-11 authors fail to identify a number of key exopolitical
factors behind false flag operations. These factors have to do with,
the political management system created for extraterrestrial
the technology and knowledge about
extraterrestrials that are located on the territory of different
the ‘black budget’ needed to finance covert operations based on
acquiring extraterrestrial technologies and information
Given the highly classified nature of
extraterrestrial affairs, all these activities occur without any
congressional or legislative oversight in the US and other major
nations such as Britain, Russia and China. I will now examine
five exopolitical factors that need to be considered when analyzing false
flag operations in general.
exopolitical factors and False Flag Operations
The first factor is the existence of a covert web of interlocking
governmental and military agencies in the US and around the world
created to manage extraterrestrial affairs. Often described as the
‘secret government’, this organization operates in parallel with the
more conventional political system comprising elected
representatives and appointed government officials.
This is similar to Lewis Lapham’s
distinction between the “provisional government” and the “permanent
government” wherein the former comprises elected officials while the
latter comprises special interest groups drawn from corporations,
military and educational sector. Individuals in the conventional
system of government, Lapham’s “provisional government”, are only
briefed on the basis of “need to know” and not due to their rank or
Consequently, it has been demonstrated
that sitting Presidents can be kept out of the loop as occurred in
the cases of presidents Carter and Clinton. President Clinton
reportedly said to senior White House reporter Sarah McClendon:
"Sarah, there's a secret government within the government, and I
have no control over it."
The ‘secret government’ managing
extraterrestrial affairs sits at the apex of the unelected
“permanent government” and has been described as
MJ-12 or PI-40.
false flag operations such as 9-11 almost certainly involve
the ‘secret government’ using such operations as part of its broader
agenda in managing extraterrestrial affairs. It is very unlikely
that transitions in the “provisional government”, such as the 2000
George Bush and the appointment of neo-conservatives to
prominent positions would be capable of producing false flag
operations on the order of 9-11.
The ascendancy of neo-conservatives to
high government positions would not be sufficient to enable false
flag operations to proceed due to the potential opposition of many
career bureaucrats and government officials. Only a more long term
and secretive management system that exists outside of the rotation
of elected political officials could hope to rein in career
bureaucrats and government officials.
Consequently, given the magnitude of the
9-11 attacks, this could only have occurred with the assent of the
secret (or permanent) government that used neo-conservatives
appointed to senior positions in the Bush administration (the
‘provisional government’) as the instruments for achieving the former’s policy goals. The uncritical support of major governments
such as Britain and Australia in subsequent policies adopted by the
Bush administration, is due to the ‘secret governments’ of these
nations coordinating their policies in a global management system
created for extraterrestrial affairs.
This involves many quasi governmental
organizations such as the
Trilateral Commission, the
Group, and the
Council of Foreign Relations that supply the
resources and leadership for dictating long term secret government
policies around the planet.
The second factor to consider for false flag operations is the need
by the secret government to maintain exclusive control of all
extraterrestrial technology and evidence found around the world.
This involves the removal of any physical evidence of
extraterrestrial visitation from the public realm, and the
relocation of this to the classified scientific laboratories of the
US or other major nations. There are numerous instances of
extraterrestrial vehicles crashing around the planet.
These have been documented and analyzed
in a recent book by Ryan Woods, Majic Eyes Only. In all these
cases, governments are expected to comply either through inducements
or sanctions with these covert efforts led by the secret government
which is global in scope. National leaders who do not comply run the
great risk of being removed from office.
For example, the 1979 coup that removed the
Prime Minister of
Granada, Sir Eric Gairy, was a false flag operation
designed to prevent Gairy from getting the United Nations to
seriously move forward in investigating the UFO issue. Gairy was
instrumental in Grenada's sponsorship of the only United Nations
Resolution dealing with UFOs (passed in 1978) and was scheduled to
meet with UN Secretary General on 13 March 1979, to discuss further
UN initiatives on UFOs based on extraterrestrial material recovered
On the same day of his meeting, his
government was removed from power in a revolutionary coup led by
Maurice Bishop. Gairy’s case suggests that false flag operations
resulting in coups led by disgruntled elites may be a result of a
policy of forcing out of office non-compliant national leaders to
the global system covering up UFO/extraterrestrial information. Such
leaders are replaced by more compliant individuals who can be easily
discredited or removed in the future.
The third exopolitical factor is the need to gain control of any
territory that once hosted ancient civilizations that contain
artifacts providing valuable information or technology left by
extraterrestrials. These ancient civilizations have buried within
their ruins much information and even technology gained through
extraterrestrial intervention that allegedly occurred millennia ago.
For example, there is much evidence that
the ancient Sumerian civilization
was sponsored by an extraterrestrial civilization known as
the Anunnaki. Sumer,
known as the cradle of western civilization, was located in southern
Iraq and was subjected to a number of archeological excavations
supported by Saddam Hussein’s regime.
There is growing evidence that the 1991 and 2003 US led military
interventions in Iraq were aimed at gaining access to some of the
ancient archeological sites in Iraq in order to find any information
or technology concerning the Anunnaki.
The fabrication of intelligence data
concerning Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
and alliance with terrorist organizations was a false flag operation
intended to justify US military intervention in 2003 in order to
ensure Iraq’s extraterrestrial assets could not be exploited by
Hussein’s regime or fall into the hands of strategic competitors
such as Russia and China.
Evidence for this fabrication came in
the September 2006 Report by the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence that confirms that intelligence data used to justify
the Iraq war was ‘overstated’.
The fourth exopolitical factor concerns the use of
weather modification technologies
that former Secretary of State William Cohen confirmed as
existing in 1997. False flag operations using weather
modification technologies are used to shift blame onto
‘unpredictable’ environmental factors, when in fact such
technologies are being used as an instrument of national policy.
Such technologies can be used to create natural disasters or events
that coerce nations into complying with the global secrecy system
concerning extraterrestrial affairs.
This global secrecy system ensures that
scientific information, alternative energy technologies and
information concerning extraterrestrials is not released into the
global media. For example, the December 2004 Asian Tsunami affected
a number of nations including the Indian sub-continent. At the time,
India had been at the forefront of a growing number of disclosures
concerning extraterrestrial visitation.
It is very possible that the Asian Tsunami served as a signal to
India that weather modification technologies could be used if India
pursued its disclosure policies. Subsequently, the Bush
administration signed in July 2005 an extraordinary agreement to
help India develop its nuclear industry, and continued to allow US
industries to outsource jobs to India. This suggests that a mix of
inducements and sanctions using weather modification technologies is
used to gain the compliance of rising nations such as India that
might otherwise challenge the global secrecy system.
The final exopolitical factor concerns
the ‘real’ black budget in the US.
Official estimates of the black budget by the Federation of
American Scientists (FAS) focus on CIA disclosures
revealing the true size of the budget funding the activities of all
US intelligence agencies. Revealed by the CIA to be 26.7 billion
dollars for fiscal year 1997, this money appears in single line
items on the annual Pentagon budget, and has been estimated by the FAS to be 30.1 billion for fiscal year 2007.
Conventional wisdom is that
budget’ is funded by the Pentagon which creates dummy projects and
exaggerates the costs of actual defense expenditures (e.g., toilet
seats), and channels all these funds into ‘deep black’ projects.
However, the real size of the black budget is estimated to be closer
to one trillion dollars per calendar year which is more than double
the whole Pentagon budget of $420 billion for Fiscal Year 2006.
This vast sum of money is accumulated by
the CIA not for ensuring US corporate profits nor for financial
dominance, but to fund a secret network of deep black projects that
constitute a second Manhattan Project.
In his book,
The Dark Alliance, Gary Webb revealed compelling
evidence that the CIA was involved in the drug trade, and that local
law enforcement agencies were deliberately undermined in their
efforts to capture the major players in the drug trade due to CIA
intervention. Evidence for this has been amassed by Michael Ruppert
on his From the Wilderness website and book, Crossing the
If the CIA is complicit in the funneling
of drugs into the US in order to generate an enormous pool of
illicit funds, the main purpose of these funds is not to enrich
‘drug barons’ or corrupt politicians, but to fund the second
Manhattan Project. Furthermore, profits generated from the
armaments, oil and other industries, both legal and illicit, are
accumulated by CIA front companies that are also funneled into deep
black projects that escape Congressional scrutiny.
These highly immoral funding activities
are tolerated on the basis of the national security concern of
hiding the true extent of the extraterrestrial related projects
created in response to an extraterrestrial presence.
Incorporating the Exopolitical Perspective on 9-11 and False Flag
False flag operations can lead to US military intervention in areas
that can help maintain the drug trade that the CIA uses to generate
funding for black budget projects. False flag operations such as the
Tonkin incident and the September 11 attack led to military
intervention in areas vital for the drug trade: Indochina and
According to Zworkin and Jones, the
Tonkin incident was orchestrated to ensure that the US would enter
the war in Vietnam to maintain US global hegemony through military
efforts to prevent communist expansion in Indochina, and provide
armaments industries with new weapons orders. However, the Vietnam
war fulfilled deeper exopolitical purposes for the US, one of which
was to help the CIA to profit from lucrative drug running
This is something that Ruppert himself
identifies but he opposes an exopolitical perspective due to his
refusal to consider evidence substantiating UFOs. Similarly, the
US intervention into Afghanistan was also motivated, according to Ruppert, by the desire to restore the drug trade that had been
threatened by the policies of the fundamentalist Taliban regime that
had all but eliminated the heroin production cycle.
The 9-11 authors provide a cogent case that recent terrorist attacks
in the US, Britain and other countries have the distinguishing
features of false flag operations that have been used in the past by
governments to target potential opponents, create contrived threats,
and to erode civil liberties.
The various books and videos dealing
with 9-11 as a false flag operation are powerful warnings of the
extent to which governments can go in order to augment their power.
In explaining the ultimate goal of these false flag operations, the
level of analysis of the most well known 9-11 authors, Jones,
Zwicker, Ruppert and Griffin do not go deep enough into revealing
the true agenda and beneficiaries.
According to Jones, Zwicker and many others, the ultimate
beneficiaries of false flag operations are the corporate barons
behind the oil and armaments industries, and the imperialistic
designs of US neoconservatives currently dominating the Bush
administration. This supposedly provides a persuasive explanation
for who is ultimately behind the war on terrorism and why it is
Rather than corporate greed and
imperialistic intentions driving the war on terrorism, there are
deeper factors that concern covert policies involving deeply
classified projects involving extraterrestrial technologies funded
by illicit black budget sources that use front companies in the oil
and armaments industries. This is where the explanations for 9-11
offered by Griffin, Jones, Ruppert and Zwicker do not go far enough
in identifying the true parameters of the ‘inside job’ that led to
Corporate greed and neo-conservative
imperialism are not the driving force behind the war against
terrorism, but the vehicles used to generate funds for a second
Manhattan project that trumps all other national security concerns
in the US and other major nations.
With the internet and increased communications threatening to
undermine the global secrecy system covering up evidence confirming
an extraterrestrial presence, the war on terror provides a means of
distracting the public, discrediting researchers seeking to expose
this evidence. The war on terrorism also provides a useful cover for
continuing to generate enormous sums of revenue for a second
Manhattan project that escapes government oversight and to increase
the power of the secret government in control of the distribution of
The authors and researchers associated
with the thesis that 9-11 was an ‘inside job’ have pointed us in the
right direction in terms of government complicity. They deserve
credit for helping open the eyes of the American public to what
really transpired in 9-11 as evidenced in the recent Zogby and
Scripps polls. However, the 9-11 authors do not identify the
different exopolitical factors that reveal the deeper agenda behind
false flag operations.
This is understandable given the way in
which advocates of a ‘Cosmic Watergate’ concerning UFOs and
extraterrestrial visitation have been ridiculed in the past.
Invoking evidence pointing to a “Cosmic Watergate” could easily be
perceived by some as a means of jeopardizing public consideration of
objective studies of 9-11.
Even worse, considering exopolitical
factors may even lead to accusations of mis-information designed to
throw 9-11 researchers off track. However, surveys such as the 2002
Roper Poll show that approximately 70% of the American public
believes the government is not telling the truth about UFOs and
This suggests that there is great
benefit in connecting the 9-11 and UFO cover ups to better
understand the key actors and institutions involved in false flag
operations and possible exopolitical factors. It is only through a
systematic understanding of the exopolitical perspective that the
true motives underscoring the ‘war on terror’ and the nature of the
‘secret government’ can be fully gauged, and a durable solution
found that prevents future false flag operations.
 I wish to thank Hugh Matlock for
his thoughtful ideas and suggestions for improving the
substantive content and organization of this paper, and for
identifying a number of typographical errors.
 Go to:
 Go to:
 For Charlie Sheen’s testimony go to:
 Cited from:
 For an article discussing Griffin’s views on Pearl Harbor
and false flag operations go to:
 For information on the New American Century project, go to:
 For a historical survey of exopolitics:
The History of Exopolitics: Evolving
Political Approaches to UFOs & the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis
 See James Deardorff, et al., “Inflation-Theory
Implications for Extraterrestrial Visitation”
The Brookings Report
 See Robert Salas and James Klotzhttp,
Faded Giant (BookSurge
 See Michael E. Salla,
Exopolitics: Political Implications of the
Extraterrestrial Presence (Dandelion Books, 2004).
The Disclosure Project
 See Lewis Lapham, “Lights, Camera, Democracy, Harper
Magazine, August 1996, excerpts available at:
 For more information go to:
Political Management of the
 See Jim Marrs,
Rule by Secrecy: The Hidden History That
Connects the Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons, and the
 For Gairy’s account of what occurred, go to:
 See Zecharia Sitchin’s
The Twelfth Planet and other books from
his Earth Chronicles series
Exopolitical Perspective on the Preemptive
War against Iraq
 See “Postwar Findings about Iraq's WMD Programs and Links
to Terrorism and How they Compare with Prewar Assessments”,
 For a number of stories concerning India’s release of
information on UFOs and extraterrestrials go to:
 See Michael Salla, “The
Black Budget Report”
 Go to:
 See “Michael Ruppert Responds to Victor Thorn’s Ten
 See Michael Ruppert,
Re: False Flag Operations, 9-11 and the
Fri Sep 15, 2006 11:10 am
Aloha all, here's a cross post from the prepare4contact forum where
I discuss more of the hidden dynamics of 911, and my recent article
on false flag operations.
Michael Salla, PhD
Hello Linda, there is now a powerful
movement questioning the Bush administration’s take on 911. This
movement is growing by the day and it’s only a matter of time
before it succeeds in exposing the real culprits behind 911.
That will be a tremendous shock for many who accept the Bush
administration line that a group of terrorists based in
Afghanistan orchestrated the whole attack. For me, many elements
in the Bush administration’s explanation stand out as red flags.
The attack on the Pentagon with no
evidence of a plane crash and only a small entry area; the
collapse of WTC 7 which was not directly hit which the
structural engineers tell us is impossible; tales of firemen
entering the impact areas of WTC 1-2 saying they were getting
the fires under control. So the idea that both towers collapsed
due to the extreme heat generated by the burning jet fuel
is a lie. I recommend spending time at the
website to read up more on these anomalies and the analyses of
Dr Steve Jones and Dr David Ray Griffin.
In short, 911 is an inside job and that truth is fueling
what will be a mass movement for truth that eventually leads to
street demonstrations, etc. As you know, in my paper (above) I
point out that the reasons given for why 911 is an inside job,
corporate greed and neo-conservative imperialism, don’t go far
enough to uncover the real dynamics and actors behind 911.
That’s why an exopolitical perspective is more persuasive.
The various elements of the massive
operation that resulted in a ‘staged’ or ‘assisted’ terrorist
attacks on 911 could not have been pulled off by a cabal of
neo-conservatives who had only been in the job for 8 months
before 911. That’s important to realize, Rumsfeld,
Wolfowitz, Cheney, etc., had only taken office in
January 2001, so they didn’t have time to plan and orchestrate
something like this which would have required the cooperation of
career officials in key intelligence agencies and military
9/11 required a more deeply entrenched secret government
action that got the neo-conservatives to do their bidding
for an operation that had already been planned. Kind of like the
way, the Kennedy administration inherited the CIA’s Bay of
Pigs operation. In my view, the same
secret government that
manages the ET presence (Majestic
12/PI 40, etc) got the neo-cons to do their bidding
since the former have a deeper exopolitical agenda for being in
Iraq as I discuss in the paper.
When the 911 truth movement succeeds, as I think it
ultimately will, the neo-conservatives will be offered up as
ritual sacrifice to a furious public. That will satisfy many,
and they will be tempted to go back to sleep. But the true
culprits are hidden more deeply in the system and takes us
in the direction of Majestic-12/PI-40, etc., and the
ET projects who made it possible for Cheney, et al., to give
the go ahead for 911 to occur.
Exposing the shadow government and the Cosmic
Watergate will be the next challenge. However, the truth
seekers will be aided by a more alert general public who will
take more seriously that a shadow government is really
orchestrating events rather than a bunch of neo-cons driven by
imperialism and greed. That will take us to the door of
Cosmic Watergate. That will be necessary otherwise there
will be more false flag operations which really are a
great danger to all of us.