Chapter 4
The Days The Sun Stood Still
“Then spoke Joshua to the Lord in the day when the Lord gave the
Amorites over to the men of Israel; and he said in the sight of
Israel, ‘Sun, stand thou still at Gibeon, and thou Moon in the
valley of Aíjalon.’ And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed,
until the nation took vengeance on their enemies. Is this not
written in the Book of Jashar? The sun stayed in the midst of
heaven, and did not hasten to go down for about a whole day. There
has been no day like it before or since, when the Lord hearkened to
the voice of a man; for the Lord fought for Israel.”
Joshua
10:12-14.
Here are some excerpts from
Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky’s Worlds In
Collision, pages 100-104.
QUOTE
The history of
China is commonly supposed to extend back to gray
antiquity. But in reality the sources of the ancient period of the
Chinese past are very scanty, for they were destroyed by the Emperor Tsin-chi-hoang (246-209 before the present era). He ordered all
books on history and astronomy, as well as works of classic
literature, to be burned. Search for these books was made throughout
the empire for this purpose. The story persists that a few remnants
of the old literature were again put into writing from the memory of
an old man; some were said to have been found hidden in the
sepulcher of Confucius, and are ascribed to his pen. Of these few
remains of the old lore, the most cherished are those which tell of
the Emperor Yahou and his times. His personality and his period are
considered as “the most auspicious in the Chinese annals”. The
history of China preceding his reign is ascribed to the mythical
period of the Chinese past. In the days of Yahou the event occurred
which separates the almost obliterated and very dim past of China
from the period that is considered historical: China was overwhelmed
by an immense catastrophe.
“At that time the miracle is said to have happened that the sun
during a span of ten days did not set, the forests were ignited, and
a multitude of abominable vermin was brought forth.”
“In the
lifetime of Yao [Yahou] the sun did not set for ten full days and
the entire land was flooded.”
An immense wave “that reached the sky” fell down on the land of
China. “The water was well up on the high mountains, and the
foothills could not be seen at all.”
(This recalls Psalm 104: “The
waters stood above the mountains…they go up by the mountains”; and
Psalm 107: “The waves mount up to the heaven.”)
“Destructive in their overflow are the waters of the inundation,”
said the emperor. “In their vast extent they embrace the hills and
overtop the great heights, threatening the heavens with their
floods.” The emperor ordered that all efforts be made to open
outlets for the waters that were caught in the valleys between the
mountains. For many years the population labored, trying to free the
plains and valleys of the waters of the flood by digging channels
and draining the fields. For a considerable number of years all
efforts were in vain. The minister who was in charge of this urgent
and immense work, Khwan, was sentenced to death because of his
failure—
“For nine years he labored, but the work was unaccomplished”—and
only his son Yu succeeded in draining the land. This achievement was
so highly rated that Yu became emperor of China after King Shun,
first successor to Yahou. This Yu was the founder of the new and
notable dynasty called by his name… According to the old Tibetan
traditions, the highlands of Tibet, too, were flooded in a great
cataclysm. The traditions of the Tibetans speak also of terrifying
comets that caused great upheavals.
Calculations were undertaken to establish the dates of the
Emperor Yahou. On the basis of a remark that the constellation Niao, thought
to be the constellation Hydra, culminated at sunset on the day of
the vernal equinox in the time of Yahou, it was reckoned that the
flood occurred in the twenty-third century before the present era,
but this date has been questioned by many. Sometimes it has also
been supposed that the “Flood of Yahou” was the Chinese story of the
universal flood, but this point of view has been abandoned. The
story of the deluge of Noah has its parallel in a Chinese tradition
about a universal flood in prehistoric times, in the days of Fohi,
who alone of all the country was saved. The flood of Yahou is
sometimes regarded as simultaneous with the flood of Ogyges. The
flood of Ogyges did not occur in the third millennium, but in the
middle of the second millennium before this era. In the section
entitled “The Floods of Deucalion and Ogyges”, the synchronism of
these devastations with the catastrophes of the days of Moses and
Joshua will be demonstrated and supported by ancient and
chronological sources.
When we summarize what has been told about the time of
Yahou, we
have the following data: the sun did not set for a number of days,
the forests were set on fire, vermin filled the country, a high wave
“reaching the sky” poured over the face of the land and swept water
over the mountain peaks and filled the valleys for many years; in
the days of Yahou the four quarters of the heaven were established
anew, and observations of the duration of the year and month and of
the order of the seasons were made. The history of China in the
period before the catastrophe is quite obliterated.
All these data are in accord with the traditions of the Jewish
people about the events connected with the Exodus: the sun
disappeared for a number of days; the land was filled with vermin;
gigantic sky-high tidal waves divided the sea; the world burned.
As we shall see, the Hebrew sources, too, reveal that a new calendar
was established reckoning from the days of the catastrophe and that
the seasons and the four quarters of the heaven were no longer the
same.
UNQUOTE
The “seasons” and “four quarters of the heaven” were not the same
because the Polar Axis had shifted. Directions changed everywhere:
North became East, and so forth. Latitudinal changes and new climate
patterns would alter the seasons. Disregarding the actual modern
time zones in favor of the strict 15° longitude lines upon which the
time zones are based, there are 6 hours difference between Imperial
China (eastern part) and Cairo, and there are 10 hours difference
between Imperial China and ancient Incan Peru.
If “the Sun stood still” over Beijing at 10 AM, it would be 4 AM in
Cairo and 8 PM in Peru. Thus, Moses and the Pharaoh would have had
“three days” (meaning “a short period”) of darkness at the same time
that “the stars stood still” for an unknown but frighteningly dark
period over Peru. It got very cold in those Andes Mountains, as the
natives reported in their oral traditions. See also below. This
works out logically—mathematically and scientifically. If the Sun
stood still over Beijing, as Emperor Yahou related, and if there was
a period of prolonged darkness in Egypt 6 hours to the west and
Peru
10 hours to the East, then the sunrise would “stand still” over
Afghanistan. See just below. The writings of Buddha related that
there was no distinction of day and night—which could be interpreted
to be a sort of “twilight zone” in between day and night, as would
be seen in Afghanistan and perhaps further eastwards. Also, all of
Europe and North America would have experienced prolonged darkness,
and Iceland surely falls into that category. Regarding the Maoris of
New Zealand, the Sun would have stood still over New Zealand as well
as China. Note in the Maori legend cited below, there is no mention
of prolonged darkness, but that “clear light increased in the
world”.
QUOTE
Worlds In Collision
Chapter 6
quoted earlier in Chapter 1
The
Maoris of New Zealand tell of fiery winds and fierce clouds that
lashed the waters into tidal waves that touched the sky and were
accompanied by furious hailstorms. The ocean fled. The progeny of
the storm and hail were “Mist, and Heavy-Dew and Light-Dew”. After
the catastrophe “but little of the dry land was left standing above
the sea. Then clear light increased in the world, and the beings who
had been hidden between sky and earth, before they were parted, now
multiplied upon the earth.”
This tradition of the
Maoris has substantially the same elements as
the Israelite tradition. The destruction of the world was
accompanied by hurricanes, hail (meteorites), and sky-high billows;
the land submerged; a mist covered the earth for a long time; heavy
dew fell to the ground together with light dew, as in the passage
quoted from Numbers 11:9.
The writings of Buddhism relate that when a world cycle comes to an
end with the world destroyed and the ocean dried up, there is no
distinction of day and night and heavenly ambrosia serves as food.
UNQUOTE
Returning now to the verses from Joshua quoted at the beginning of
this chapter, this event of the Sun’s standing still over Gibeon for
a “whole day” must have been something different than the time of
the Exodus. The Israelites wandered in the Sinai desert for “40
years” and then Moses appointed Joshua as his successor. A few years
later, Joshua was battling one tribe after another to conquer the
“Promised Land”. During one of these battles, the Sun stood still.
When was this event? Personally I like to place it in the 12th year
after the death of Moses, because 40 + 12 = 52, and 52 conveniently
corresponds to the Mayan basic cycle. However, other historians have
placed this event in the 3rd or 4th year after Moses’ death. It is
not clear from the Scriptures exactly how many years had passed
since Moses died, but Dr. Velikovsky also used a period of about 12
years. This passage could be brushed aside as only another Biblical
myth or “miracle” if it weren’t for one coincidental event halfway
around the globe. There’s a 6-7 hour time difference between Lake
Titicaca, Peru, and the Land of Canaan, and 8 hours difference from
México City. Legends in America tell of a period when for a time,
the Sun did not rise. Cold fell upon the land, and the people lived
in great fear, gazing in all directions, speculating on where “the
New Sun” would rise. Finally, after the passage of some hours or
days, the Sun rose again but in a different direction from where it
had risen before. The Polar Axis had shifted. “The four quarters of
the heaven were established anew.”
In Egypt there are legends that at one time the Sun rose in what is
now the west and set in what is now the east. A mural discovered in
the Tomb of Senmut shows the Constellations in a different
relationship to the rising and setting of the Sun than they are
today. For additional information on this subject, the reader is
referred to Worlds In Collision by
Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky and The
Lost Realms by
Zecharia Sitchin.
When it’s 11 AM in Jerusalem, it’s 5 AM in La Paz, 4 AM in
Lima and
3 AM in
México City. If “the sun stayed in the midst of heaven” over
Palestine at 11 AM
and if this also happened to occur in mid-August, the beginning of
the Mayan New
Year, when the Pleiades are overhead in the early morning sky, then
over the
Americas on this date the Pleiades themselves would seem to stand
still in the predawn sky.
When did this event occur? Assuming a 12-year span between the death
of Moses and Joshua’s battle with the Amorites, then it occurred in
(1587-52=) 1535 BCE. And as was stated, this 52-year period between
two possible “cosmic catastrophes” corresponds exactly to the Mayan
52-year sacred calendar which was connected to the Pleiades, the
home of their “gods”. Therefore, there must have been at least one,
possibly even two, Polar Axis Shifts during the time-period of about
1587 - 1535 BCE.
During a Polar Axis Shift the north-south-east-west perspective of
every place on Earth would change because the North and South Poles
would be in new latitudes and longitudes. For this to happen, the
following would have to occur: the Earth would cease its rotation in
its current direction, change its polar alignment on a “Polar
Pivotal Axis” of some sort, and then begin to rotate as usual on its
new north-south polar axis. If it takes a day for this to happen,
then at some point in that day certain people in certain locations
would see the Sun “stand still” or even move in an odd direction,
and others around the globe would see the Stars and perhaps the Moon
“stand still”. If those who saw the Stars stand still also saw the
Pleiades high overhead at the time of this strange event, no doubt
they would associate the Pleiades, Abode of the Gods, with this
occurrence. On top of that, the Mayas believed that occasionally the
Earth was “destroyed” in cycles called “tuns” that lasted for
certain absolutely even multiples of 52-year periods. The current
great cycle or Atautun comes to an end on 21 December 2012, exactly
3,600 years later than 21 December 1588 BCE.
Can all of this be mere coincidence? Or is the arrival/departure of
the Planet X Nibiru what is responsible for these ancient memories
of catastrophes? Questions: Why did the Sun stand still over China,
or does it make any difference where this phenomenon happens to
occur? Obviously the Pole shifted during this event, because the
“quarters of the heaven” were changed, that is, the four directions
were different. Then the Sun stood still again for a few hours over
Gibeon during Joshua’s battle, for a shorter time. What would have
been the difference between these two events?
We can know this sort of scientific information only after the fact.
Will we learn anymore the next time around (2012-2013), or will we
revert back to unscientific barbarism, living off the land again
like primitive cavemen? That is a most troubling mystery, and it
lingers in my thoughts almost on a daily basis. Do “the gods” even
care what happens to us? Does our “progress” from one “shar” to the
next mean nothing to them?
Go Back
Chapter 5
Atlantis & Antarctica
Plato’s account of
Atlantis in Timaeus &
Critias is the original
source for this “legend”, although a number of later writers also
mentioned Atlantis. Since there is no reason for Plato to have
deliberately lied about this, most traditional historians simply
consider Plato’s tale to be allegorical in nature. But here, let us
assume that it is true.
When was Atlantis destroyed and when did it “disappear beneath the
sea”? Plato wrote about Solon’s visit to Egypt in 500 BCE, and he
stated that Atlantis had sunk beneath the sea approximately 9,000
years previously, leading us back to 9500 BCE. Other writers “round
it off” to 10,000 BCE.
What did Atlantis look like? It was a circular island continent with
a high mountain range in the center and with the world’s largest
natural harbor. Antarctica is a rather circular island continent
with a high mountain range across the center; the somewhat centrally
located South Pole itself is at an elevation of 9,554 feet or 2,912
meters. And the continent has two of the world’s largest natural
harbors, namely, the Weddell Sea with Ronne Ice-Shelf and the
Ross
Sea with Ross Ice-Shelf. If the Ronne Ice-Shelf were thawed out and
passable, it would be a magnificent harbor. Where was Atlantis? The
island continent was located at such a latitude on the planet as to
allow it to have a mild Mediterranean climate for most of the year,
and it produced bountiful harvests of fruits and vegetables.
If the
Polar Axis were located in a different place, depending upon where
Antarctica would be located, it could undoubtedly have had periods
of excellent climate. Plato noted that to reach Atlantis from
Egypt,
one had to sail out through the Pillars of Hercules, that is, the
Straits of Gibraltar. Note that the Suez Canal is a modern
achievement; in bygone days, there was no maritime passage from the
Mediterranean to the Red Sea. To reach Antarctica from Egypt in
those days before the Suez Canal, one would have had to sail out
through the Straits of Gibraltar and head southwards across the
modern Middle and South Atlantic Oceans, assuming that one’s passage
was not obstructed by Polar Ice, which stretched from West Africa to
Northeastern Brazil during the period from 8787 until 5187 BCE. See
below.
Plato wrote further that from Atlantis one could sail into the
“Great Ocean” that lay beyond it. Arriving at Antarctica from the
South Atlantic Ocean, one could grab some shore-leave in an exotic
port of call, and then sail onwards into the adjacent “great”
Pacific Ocean.
Thus, these crucial descriptive points that Plato made about
Atlantis can lead us to the assumption that the unfrozen Antarctica,
located at a Mediterranean-like northern latitude, was the legendary
paradise of Atlantis. This idea first occurred to me in 1973, and
yes, I am familiar with
the Piri Reis maps of the unfrozen Antarctic
coastline. Nothing that I have read or heard since then has
contradicted this identification, and I’ll continue to believe it
for the duration, until absolutely proven wrong. Through the years,
however, I have noticed certain other writers who mention this most
logical identification; but because of the “mystical antiquity” of
the whole idea of Atlantis, most people don’t pay much attention to
any of it. It has become just another mythical bygone era of heroes
and villains for use in actionpacked Hollywood films. And, for the
record, it is not the place here to speculate about the “advanced
technology” of Atlantis and its possible connections to Outer Space.
Plato mentioned nothing about such advanced technology and space
travel; those ideas were “channeled” later by “mediums” like
Edgar
Cayce—and thus they do not belong in historical or scientific
discussions of this nature. And it might also be added that Plato’s
account of Atlantis is incomplete. Here are the final sentences in
Plato’s tale:
“Zeus, the god of gods, who rules with law, and is able to see into
such things, perceiving that an honorable race was in a most
wretched state, and wanting to inflict punishment on them, that they
might be chastened and improved, collected all the gods into his
most holy habitation, which, being placed in the centre of the
world, sees all things that partake of generation. And when he had
called them together he spake as follows:”
There Plato’s account
abruptly ends. The phrase “centre of the world” could mean from
their position in Mount Olympus above Earth’s North Pole, from which
they could “survey the regions”. I quote this because it refers back
to those remarks in Chapter 1 concerning the degrees of wickedness
into which humanity can sink at the end of an Iron Age or Kali Yuga.
Thus, even in Plato, there is a “wickedness factor” in the overall
Doomsday scenario.
Diodorus Siculus was a Roman historian and writer who began his
40-book literary career around the same time that Augustus Caesar
implemented the Julian Calendar. In Library Of History, Book V,
written in 8 BCE, Diodorus related the following account of an
Atlantic island, which some have interpreted as referring to the
Atlantis of Plato:
“For there lies out in the ocean from Libya [i.e., Africa - RS] an
island of considerable size, situated a number of days voyage to the
west. Its land is fruitful, much of it being covered with mountains
and the remainder a beautiful level plain.
Through it flow navigable rivers, which are also used for
irrigation…on it are many
luxurious houses…where the inhabitants go in summer. The land
supplies
everything in abundance…it is well supplied with fresh water…has
excellent
hunting…and every variety of sea fish…It would appear that the
island was a dwelling place of gods and not of men.
“In ancient times it remained undiscovered because of its distance
from the known world, but it was discovered at a later period… by the
Phoenicians who while exploring the coast outside of the Pillars of
Hercules were driven by strong winds a great distance out to sea
and… cast ashore on this island; and, when they had observed its
nature, they caused it to be known to all men.”
If Diodorus was
referring to Atlantis, he did not call it by that name and would
have been referring to something that, even from his own legends,
did not exist anymore. Diodorus used the present tense, as if this
“island” still existed in his own time. For all we know from
Diodorus, these Phoenicians could have been cast ashore in North or
South America, where ancient Phoenician coins inexplicably have
indeed been found! His remark about “luxurious” summerhouses is
curious, in light of our prosperous modern culture where many
families have summerhouses, luxurious or otherwise.
My “Theory of Polar Axial Displacement” is complex in that there are
so many details that have to be considered and coordinated. The
following hypothesis is a summary of part, albeit a most important
part, of the overall theory. There is evidence of an “Ice Age”
in
South Africa and Hawaii. Traditional science assumes that the
CURRENT North and South Polar Icecap Zones expanded towards the
Equator; and traditionalists would conclude that the “Ice Age” in
South Africa was a result of South Polar Expansion, and that of
Hawaii of North Polar Expansion. There are all sorts of internal
contradictions amongst the various establishment theories of
so-called “Ice Ages”; Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky has adequately
documented this. These currently ice-free areas like South Africa
where there is evidence of an “Ice Age” were merely under a
different Polar Icecap at a different epoch of geological time. If
you consult a world globe, you will have a better understanding of
what I am saying. See also
Chapter 2.
If the cause of such Polar Axial Shifting is the periodic arrival,
docking and
tethering of the Planet X Nibiru—Hyperborea, The Cosmic Tree, The
Night Sun—
then these catastrophes must repeat in cycles of 3,600 Earth Years,
the length of one Nibiruan Year, one “Shar”.
-
The last one occurred in the year
1587
BCE, the
traditional date for the Santorini Cataclysm and the Velikovskian
date for the
Exodus Plagues.
-
The previous arrival occurred in the year
5187 BCE,
which can be
coordinated with the Floods of Noah, Utnapishtim and
Deucalion, as
well as the
archaeological finds in the Black Sea.
-
And going back another 3,600
years prior to
that takes us to 8787 BCE for that arrival of the Planet X Nibiru.
Undoubtedly, the
destruction of Atlantis, as recounted by Plato, coincided with that
particular
“crossing” of Nibiru, even though the calculated date here is not
identical with
Plato’s generalization of the date of 9500 BCE. But since these
catastrophes are not
caused by any other known periodic cosmic body, the conclusion is
not far-fetched
that the Atlantis cataclysm coincided with the 8787 arrival of
Planet X Nibiru; the date 8787 is closer in time to 9500 than would
be another whole “shar” of 3,600 more years, back to 12,387 BCE.
Dr. Velikovsky, it must be noted again, did not believe in Plato’s
literal date for the timeframe of Atlantis. He concluded that
Plato
meant 900 years, not 9,000 years, ago; and that the destruction of
Santorini/Thera around 1600 BCE gave rise to the legend of the
destruction of Atlantis. Dr. Velikovsky’s idea was contradicted
internally by the fact that Plato located Atlantis “beyond the
Pillars of Hercules”, not in the Mediterranean near Greece. This Santorini hypothesis for
Atlantis was followed up later by renown
French undersea explorer Jacques Cousteau, and it has since become
the establishment retort to the antiquity date explicitly stated by
Plato. Assume that the North Pole was once located near
Johannesburg, South Africa, and that the South Pole was located
northeast of the Hawaiian Islands.
This would completely reverse the
north-south and east-west directions with respect to Egypt and the
Great Pyramid. All of Africa would be a land mass stretching NORTH
from Egypt towards the Johannesburg Pole, much like North America
stretches northwards today to the Arctic. The Pillars of Hercules,
or Straits of Gibraltar, would have been east, not west, of Egypt
and Greece (which itself would have been due-south, not north, of
Egypt). And more importantly, the South Africa Polar Zone would not
have obstructed maritime travel between the Mediterranean and the
then-unfrozen Atlantis, which would have been located in the
northern hemisphere at about the same latitudes as modern Australia
is located south of the Equator. It would have had a wonderfully
subtropical Mediterranean-style climate and have been in total
command of all the world’s major sea routes. This was PRIOR to 8787
BCE!
Then Planet X Nibiru returned, and the Poles shifted again. The
North Pole shifted from South Africa out into the middle of the
South Atlantic Ocean, stretching from West Africa to Northeastern
Brazil, both regions of which contain evidence of an “Ice Age”. As a
result of this shift of the Polar Axis, there was now North Polar
Ice spanning the Middle Atlantic Ocean, blocking all maritime
traffic between the Mediterranean and Antarctica/Atlantis via the
Pillars of Hercules. Atlantis disappeared or “sank beneath the sea”.
Contact between Egypt and Atlantis was severed permanently. Only the
legend persisted, to be handed down for thousands of years from
priest to priest, until finally Plato recorded it for posterity.
With that introduction, here is the abstract from a lecture given by
Flavio Barbiero at the June 1999 Catastrophism Conference at the
University of Bergamo in Italy. Signor Barbiero lectured on the
identification of Atlantis with Antarctica. This abstract was
included in the September 2000 edition (Volume V, Number 1) of The Velikovskian Journal published by
Charles Ginenthal in New York.
QUOTE
Was Atlantis In Antarctica? Arguments In Favour.
By Flavio Barbiero
Centro Camuno di Studi Preistorici
Capodiponte, Italia
All over the world there exist myths about a universal flood and
traditions about an antediluvian civilization called Atlantis or
Mu.
Scientists deny usually any validity to such traditions or at least
greatly reduce their significance, bringing them to more manageable
spatial and temporal dimensions from an archaeological point of view
(Santorini, etc.). Geology and archaeology, in fact, do not allow
any space on Earth for an advanced civilization of the size and the
antiquity of Atlantis, as described by Plato.
This attitude does not take into account the climatic situation on
Earth during the concerned period. According to the theory exposed
by the author [that is, Flavio Barbiero - RS] in a previous section,
the climatic situation during the Pleistocene was influenced by the
fact that the North Pole was located between Greenland and Canada,
at the edge of the great Wisconsin Icecap. As a consequence, the
South Pole was placed near the current magnetic pole, on the coast
of Antarctica facing Australia. The coast of Antarctica facing the
Atlantic, therefore, was placed at a much lower latitude and was
completely free of ice, as witnessed by conclusive geological
evidence.
[COMMENT: Note well the mention by
Signor Barbiero of the Wisconsin
anomaly, which was described in Chapter 1. Here also we find that
the Atlantic coast of modern Antarctica contains evidence of
deglaciation, which is just what one might expect. It was the
contention of Dr. Velikovsky that the previous North Polar Zone was
centered between Greenland and Canada; thus, this is a Velikovskian
principle. However, it is my thinking that the last North Pole
actually was located a few hundred miles south of Greenland, more
into the North Atlantic between Spain/France and Québec.
Nevertheless, the previous North Pole was located farther southwards
into the Atlantic than today, in a counterclockwise direction of the
former North Poles which were located in the Middle-South Atlantic
Ocean and South Africa. RS]
While the Palaeolithic cultures were thriving all over the remaining
parts of the world, in that part of Antarctica the first human
agricultural civilization developed in complete isolation, thanks to
populations driven there by oceanic currents from Southeast Asia and
South America.
At the end of the Pleistocene, an asteroid or a comet impact
triggered a shift of the
poles, according to the mechanism explained in the previous
communication. This
resulted in the worldwide catastrophe remembered by traditions as
the “universal
flood”, during which Atlantis sank (temporarily) in the ocean. Soon
after, the glaciation covered the Atlantic coasts of Antarctica, thus deleting
all archaeological evidence.
[COMMENT: From this statement, one can immediately note that this
writer, as did Dr. Velikovsky, considers these occurrences to be
“random” events, such as an errant asteroid or comet. Thus, they are
forced to discuss them in isolation from each other and thereby
arrive at false conclusions. RS]
Several vessels must have survived
the catastrophe, bringing their crew safely to the coasts of
America, Africa and Asia. Here they started, in complete autonomy
and isolation, the Neolithic cultures and later civilizations. The
numerous striking similarities between ancient civilizations all
over the world were due in our view to the common culture of the
survivors of the flood. An impressive amount of evidence of
different kinds supports this theory.
[COMMENT: Of course.
Ignatius Donnelly in Atlantis: The Antediluvian
World mentioned all of these similarities. They form the cornerstone
of modern Atlantology. RS]
The chronological gap of 4 millennia between the end of
Atlantis and
the archaeological findings of the most ancient known civilizations
(such as
Mohenjo Daro, Ur and so on), is only apparent due to the
thawing of the northern hemisphere’s icecap; the sea level has been
constantly rising during the first 4 millennia after the end of the
Pleistocene, for a total amount of possibly 130 meters, thus
submerging any remnants of populations established along the coasts.
This is confirmed by the existence of submerged structures all over
the world, like the great
pyramid off Yonaguni Island (Japan), the
remnants of a town off the Cádiz coast and so on.
UNQUOTE
The following information was taken from an article by the late
British Atlantologist, Dr. Egerton Sykes, that appeared in
The
Atlantis Magazine in September 1973 (page 95).
“All three [Bimini,
Andros, North Sea - RS] are facets of the megalithic culture, which
lasted until BC 1500 and which may well have started in BC 10,000 in
Atlantis. The ruins which we have been able to find are those which
were on the European and American continental shelves which endured
until BC 6000, the date when the Atlantic broke through into the
Mediterranean by the Straits of Gibraltar, into the North Sea by Ys
and Lyonysse; and into the Caribbean and surrounding islands of
Bimini and Andros. The cause was probably the melting of glacial ice
sheets in the North, the same as that which forced the Thalassic
peoples to leave Central Asia.”
There were Polar Axis Shifts, with accompanying melting polar
ice-caps, in 1587,
5187 and 8787 BCE. The fact that the “megalithic culture” lasted
until about 1500
BCE undoubtedly reflects the axis shift of 1587; and the date for
the Atlantic’s
breaking through into the Mediterranean, along with other
contemporaneous events, most certainly could be more accurately
dated at 5187 BCE, rather than closer to 6000 BCE.
In the book Atlantis Rising by Brad Steiger (1973) we find these
observations:
“In the January 1969 issue of Fate magazine,
Hugh Auchincloss Brown reports on the evidence that indicates that the
Temple of Serapis at Pozzuoli on the Adriatic Sea’s Gulf of Venice
was erected by artisans of a civilization that existed 12,000 to
19,000 years ago. Brown writes that the temple must have been
erected when the site was above sea level, as it is at the present
time, but that it has been below sea level by at least 20 feet,
judging by the holes left by boring clams 15 to 20 feet above the
present sea level. The creators of the great marble columns had
tools that enabled their workmanship to rival the Egyptians.
According to Brown: ‘The present location of Pozzuoli is
approximately 46° North Latitude, but at the time the Temple was
erected its latitude was 40°. The earth did a roll-around which was
caused by the eccentric rotating mass of ice at the North Pole, and
Pozzuoli moved to approximately 65° North Latitude at which time the
temple was submerged.’”
These conclusions of Mr. Brown confirm my
own (as well as Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky’s) placement of the previous
North Polar Zone in the North Atlantic Ocean and the zone previous
to that in the middle South Atlantic Ocean.
If this Temple of Serapis was constructed when its present geographical location was
at about 40° North Latitude, then it must have been erected when the
North Pole was located between Nigeria and Brazil. At that time the
Gulf of Venice was located at about 35° North Latitude, rather than
at its present latitude of 46° North. Then following the Polar Axis
Shift of 5187 BCE, when the Atlantic broke through the Straits of
Gibraltar and thereby raised the level of the Mediterranean Sea, the
site of the Temple of Serapis in the Gulf of Venice not only would
have most likely been submerged but also would have been located at
about 55° North Latitude. Thus, when the North Pole was positioned
between Spain/France and Québec, south of Greenland, from 5187-1587
BCE, the level of the Mediterranean Sea must have been at least 20
feet higher than its present level. This would also help explain
recent enigmas discovered in the Black Sea, dating back about 7,000
years. Following the Polar Axis Shift of 1587 BCE, the level of the
Mediterranean Sea decreased and exposed the Temple of Serapis once
again, now located at its current latitude.
Finally, here is additional miscellaneous information which is taken
from the book We Are Not The First by Andrew Tomas (1971), pages
74-76. This information is included here for the record.
QUOTE
The people of antiquity believed in the tremendous ages of the world
and mankind,
which they estimated in tens of thousands and even millions of
years. To the
European of Napoleonic times, the earth and man were created by God
only several thousand years ago. However, the Asiatics had different
views. The Brahmins of India calculated the duration of the
universe, or the Day of Brahma, to be 4.32 billion years. The
Druses
of Lebanon set the beginning of creation at 3.43 billion years. The
present age of the earth is considered to be about 4.6 billion
years, whereas that of the crust is 3.3 billion years. There are
strange parallels between these figures. What is really
extraordinary is the pundits’ time reckoning in milliards of
years—cosmic chronology of this type was unknown until this century.
-
According to Simplicius (sixth century A.D.) ancient
Egyptians kept
records of astronomical observations for 630,000 years.
-
The archives
of Babylon were 470,000 years old, wrote Cicero with a remark that
he did not believe this claim.
-
Hipparchus (c. 190-125 B.C.)
mentioned Assyrian chronicles stretching back for 270,000 years.
-
The Egyptian priests told
Herodotus [sic: actually it was Solon,
whose visit was mentioned by Plato in Timaeus & Critias—RS ] in the
fifth century B.C. that the sun had not always risen where it rose
then. This implied that they had kept records of the precession of
equinoxes, covering at least 26,000 years.
-
The Greek historian
Diogenes Laertius (third century A.D.) claimed that the astronomical
records of Egyptian priests began in 49,219 B.C. He also referred to
their registers of 373 solar and 832 lunar eclipses, which would
involve a period of approximately 10,000 years.
-
The Byzantine historian
George Syncellus said that the chroniclers
of the pharaohs had recorded all events for 36,525 years.
-
Martianus
Capella (fifth century A.D.) wrote that the Egyptian sages had
secretly studied astronomy for over 40,000 years before they
imparted their knowledge to the world.
-
The first dynasty after the
Deluge was traced by Babylonian priests to a date 24,150 years
before their time.
-
According to
Codex Vaticanus A-3738, the Mayas had kept their
calendrical system since 18,612 B.C.
-
Herodotus places the reign of
Osiris at about 15,500 B.C. From the
information given to him by the priests of the land of the Nile, he
made the remark that they were quite certain about the exactitude of
the date.
-
The lunar calendar of Babylon and the solar calendar of
Egypt coincided in the year 11,542 B.C.
-
The calendrical computations
of India began with the year 11,652 B.C.
-
According to Plato, the
Egyptian priests fixed the date of the sinking of Atlantis at 9850
B.C., while the Zoroastrian books set the “beginning of time” at
9600 B.C.
That these dates are correct can be questioned. But we cannot escape
the conclusion that the ancients were much closer to the truth than
the scholars and clerics of one and a half centuries ago who thought
that the world had been created in 4004 B.C., according to the
Biblical chronological study of Bishop Ussher. The universe of the
Brahmins was almost as old as that of modern science. The chronicles
of the Mayas, the Egyptians, and the Babylonians went farther back
in time than our history. In view of what our science has yet to
learn, it would be presumptuous to accuse them of exaggeration.
The mental horizons of the peoples of antiquity were vast, and we
are only beginning to see today what they perceived yesterday. The
priests of Babylon and Egypt believed that man was civilized
500,000
years ago. They kept historical and astronomical records in their
archives, as Simplicius and Cicero tell us. We can smile at these
claims and give civilization 5,000 years to progress from the
chariot to the automobile, from bows and arrows to the atomic bomb,
from the boat to the spaceship.
UNQUOTE
Since 1973, I have been a charter lifetime member of the Ancient
Mediterranean Research Association (AMRA) headquartered in Los
Angeles, California. Our Founder and Director is Professor Maxine
Klein Asher, formerly of Pepperdine University. The Co-Founder was
Pepperdine Professor Julian Nava, who later served as U.S.
Ambassador to Mexico under President Jimmy Carter. I first became
acquainted with Dr. Asher in 1973, because she was in the news for
her expedition to Spain to prove the discovery of the Lost Atlantis.
Accompanied by Spanish undersea diver Francisco “Paco” Salazar Casero, she travelled with a California university group to Cádiz.
Paco, she reported later, took some underwater photos of Atlantean
artifacts.
But, as luck would have it, they were diving and
exploring too close to a top-secret naval facility and got “chased
out” of Spain as spies, fearing for their lives, and sought refuge
in Ireland. Back in New York City, Maxine gave a press conference;
and via The Associated Press, she got stories written in Time,
Newsweek and US News & World Report, as well as various newspapers
like The Dallas Morning News. 1973 was also the same year that I’d
taken up the study of Atlantis myself, and I was most intrigued by
her expedition. However, before I ever heard of her, I’d already
made up my own mind that Atlantis was Antarctica, not some area only
a short mile or two off the coast of Cádiz.
Paco’s pictures were blurry black-and-white images of a couple of
“ancient” vases,
supposedly on the bottom of the ocean. There was no size-frame of
reference for
anything, and no people were in these pictures. But other than these
pictures and
her own account of events as she chronicled them in her 1974 book
The Atlantis
Conspiracy, over the years Dr. Asher has produced absolutely no
evidence of
Atlantis off/in Spain. And she has made over 40 trips to Spain in
this regard. She
informed me several years ago that she has a lot of “confidential”
material which she is unable to reveal to anyone, not even to
trusted longtime association members like myself, who have
contributed money to the funding of one of her illustrious
expeditions to Cádiz and who were promised a full report which we
investors never received. Frankly, I don’t buy it anymore. After all
these years, as well as the fact that she herself is getting older,
she should release some of this material to prove her contention.
Periodically she will send out a newsletter from AMRA, faithfully I
might add for 30 years. In it she will once again state that an
exciting new discovery is about to be made in Atlantis research, so
stay tuned for further details. After a while, it becomes
repetitively old news.
Atlantis was Antarctica. In January 1981 whilst on a trip to
Southern California, I visited Dr. Asher and was invited to lecture
to the association at a Westwood bank community room. I took along
my world polar globe (see the back-cover photograph) and
demonstrated how Plato could have been referring to Antarctica.
Maxine and the group listened politely and applauded, but I got the
distinct impression that I was merely their “oddity” of the month,
that none of them intended to give up their fantasy belief, inspired
by their glorious leader Maxine, that Atlantis was off the coast of Cádiz.
Again, in a fall 2000 newsletter, Maxine had the following to report
about a recent television program which I personally did not see and
knew nothing about.
QUOTE
The Search For Atlantis
A&E Cable TV,
September 10, 2000
A recent two-hour documentary about
Atlantis was aired on A&E cable
television, narrated by Ted Danson. Everyone who viewed the show
thought it was a “nightmarish” collection of non-truths and
omissions obviously designed to abort Atlantis research and keep the
truth about the lost continent as a myth. The show was hastily made
and absolutely flawed. Here are some of the errors.
1) The show
claimed that Plato made up his story about Atlantis because he was
upset over the death of Socrates. There is absolutely no truth in
this statement and it cannot be documented.
2) The documentary stated that
Columbus was searching for Atlantis.
This is untrue. Columbus was aware of Atlantis but his primary goal
was to find new land for the Spanish crown.
3) That statement that if
Atlantis exists, it is either in Bolivia
or Antarctica (where it
obviously is not). No mention was made of either Spain or Bimini
where most
Atlantis research has taken place. No mention was made of Dr. David
Zink or the
Cayce explorations at Bimini. Bimini was mentioned in one sentence,
glossed over, and no photographs were displayed, even though ample
film exists about this site.
4) The daughter of the deceased Greek
archaeologist Marinatos was shown on camera, giving the wrong dates
for Santorini (Thera) and claiming it was not Atlantis. No mention
was made of Marinatos’ mentor, Dr.Angeles Galanopolous, a superb
archaeologist, whose book in 1968 was irrefutable proof of the
connection between Atlantis and Thera. Recent datings of Thera in
Archaeology Magazine predate the statements made on the TV show by
more than 3,000 years.
5) Both
Edgar Cayce and Madame Helena Blavatsky were made to look like fools.
Statements made about these two mystics were totally in error and
very defamatory.
6) One-half hour was devoted to
Hitler and his
desire to turn Germany into Atlantis, using Atlantis as the reason
for the Holocaust. We know that Hitler was intrigued by Atlantis but
the causes of the Holocaust were complex and only marginally related
to the Atlantis story.
There were other major errors and omissions. The show closed with a
picture of the new Atlantis Hotel and Casino in the Bahamas showing
a gambling table and hinting that this was probably what Atlantis
was like. Your editor appealed to A&E, to Ted Danson and to the two
sponsors of the show, but no response was received.
UNQUOTE
By “other major errors and omissions” Dr. Asher is undoubtedly
referring to the fact that A&E did not consult or interview her for
this program. She’s been claiming for years that she is going to
produce her own movie or television program about Atlantis and
finally reveal all, but she’s never struck a deal with anybody,
despite her Hollywood connections. And I read in June 2003 that
she’s now looking for a Chinese movie producer.
Maxine is/was a friend of actress-dancer Ann Miller, who was
affiliated with this
association at one time. Ann Miller accompanied Maxine to Cairo on
an expedition
to search for possible clues as to the location of the buried annals
of Atlantis. They
were wined and dined in high style by the Mayor of Cairo and other
notables, for
the most part academics. They discovered nothing, but they sure did
have a good
time, sailing up and down the River Nile! As part of the trip, they
invited flautist
Paul Horn along. He received permission from the Egyptian
antiquities department
to record some flute music inside the King’s and Queen’s Chambers of
the Great
Pyramid and the Second Pyramid. AMRA was partly behind the recording
and
marketing of this album. I have a copy (two-record volume), and it
is some of the
most breathtakingly beautiful music that I have ever heard.
The
album set featured
an insert, describing the expedition and the process of recording
the music, in which
Dr. Asher is shown photographed with Paul Horn at the Pyramid
Complex. This album is probably no longer available. For your
information, Paul Horn also recorded a live album in the
Taj Mahal,
which I have also heard; but I think that it pales in comparison to
the acoustics of the Pyramids, where the internal echoes of the
notes being played intermingle with the actual melody—it is
fascinating music and so totally pleasing to the ear and relaxing to
the mind! Everybody who had a hand in that Pyramid flute project
should be complimented and congratulated. As for item 3 above, Dr.
David Zink wrote a book titled The Stones Of Atlantis describing his
research concerning the Bimini Blocks, as well as linking
Atlantis
to legends of “Pleiadian Gods” which are prevalent in the
mythologies of Central and South America. This is an excellent book,
and I have a copy. Refer back to
Chapter 4.
There is/was another
undersea explorer named J. Manson Valentine who conducted similar
research from his base in Miami. He has also been affiliated with
Maxine and AMRA in past years. As for Edgar Cayce, he is ultimately
only another “channeler”, nothing more nor less. His information
must therefore be discounted, and it is surprising that Maxine
continues to cite the Cayce Foundation. One cannot even begin to put
Cayce into the same intellectual category with Madame Blavatsky, if
indeed that is what the program implied, as Maxine reported (see
item 5 above).
Regarding item 4 above, I do not know what she is really referring to
here. Her statements are confusing because she herself doesn’t
believe that Atlantis was Santorini. Her statement about the dating
of the Santorini/Thera Cataclysm is equally obscure; Santorini is definitively dated to about 1500-1600 BCE—there is no
argument here at all from anyone, establishment or otherwise.
In short, it is w-a-y over time for Dr. Maxine Asher either to put
up or to shut up.
Go Back
Chapter 6
The Night Sun
Hyperborea. Nail Of The North. The Cosmic Tree. It sits atop a
tether linked to the Earth’s North Pole. But it is visible only in
the Northern Hemisphere, no matter where the actual North Pole is
located along the Polar Pivotal Belt, with respect to the Pyramid
Complex at Cairo.
Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky, in the last couple of years before his
death in November 1979, wrote in the KRONOS Journal about a “Night
Sun” that used to be in the Earth’s sky, like a second satellite or
whatever, stationary above the North Pole, and visible both day and
night. When one eventually puts all of this into the context of the
Planet X Nibiru and
Hamlet’s Mill by Giorgio de Santillana and
Hertha von Dechend, then one sees a pattern, which seems like an
understatement at this point in time.
In the KRONOS Journal before his death, in only a single article
with perhaps a colleague’s follow-up commentary, Dr. Velikovsky
theorized that at one time in the past, before the time of Moses and
the Exodus, there was a “Second Sun” in our sky, a “Night Sun” which
was dimmer than our “ordinary” Sun; and since it was stationary
above the North Pole, it was visible day and night only by those in
the current Northern Hemisphere. It was a “reddish color”, and its
presence meant that there was never any total nighttime darkness as
there is today at a time of the New Moon. He documented its
existence from various world mythologies that mention such a
phenomenon. For certain reasons, he proposed that this “Night Sun”
was the Planet Saturn, basing a lot of his reasoning on linguistic
data regarding the names of the gods in various ancient cultures. He
further postulated that this “Night Sun” was linked to our North
Pole by an electromagnetic “water beam” of some sort. This overall
idea was expanded upon by David Talbott in his video Remembering The
End Of The World, available for sale on the Web. But it was not the
Planet Saturn. It was the “Rogue” Planet X Nibiru.
As I’ve noted, I have been a part of the
Velikovskian School for
many years. After
Dr. Velikovsky’s death in late 1979, as time went by, this highbrow
intellectual
school split into (more or less!) two main factions, the “purists”
who are now
affiliated with Charles Ginenthal’s The Velikovskian (to whom I
belong), and the
“revisionists” who are those affiliated with David Talbott’s
Kronia
Communications Group.
David Talbott’s video is magnificent, technologically speaking—but a
yawner overall. He needed a good film editor. But that aside, his
animated presentation of “The Cosmic Tree” (or, as he puts it, the
Planet Saturn) and its relationship to many of our ancient symbols
is quite remarkable. His problem was—he didn’t know what he was
talking about. He claimed that this “thing” up above the North Pole
was the Planet Saturn. He didn’t once ever mention the literal
“Cosmic Tree” of Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechend, let
alone anything related to the Planet X Nibiru.
Whether one is a “purist” or a “revisionist” in the Velikovskian
School, they have no place for any mention of the Planet X Nibiru
and Zecharia Sitchin. In the summer of 1979, in KRONOS, Vol. IV, No.
4, Velikovskians C. Leroy Ellenberger and Roger W. Wescott denounced
Sitchin’s Twelfth Planet, and that was the end of the matter as far
as they were concerned. Ancient Astronauts? What a crock! If
Dr. Velikovsky was aware of Sitchin before he died later that year, I do
not know. And that is where I beg to differ with these “purists”.
These Velikovskians do not concede in even the most insignificant
way that there could have been “gods from outer space”.
They are
robots, to put it bluntly, because they don’t have the courage to
venture from the purely physical side of the Universe to the
“metaphysical” side. They would never link their “scientific”
theories to the Great Pyramid of Egypt, for example; else all the
other “scientists” up in the Ivy League Universities would ridicule
them to no end, such as the late Professor Carl Sagan who was one of
Dr. Velikovsky’s greatest critics, and who would also have laughed
in Sitchin’s face. They are obviously egotistically more concerned
about their own personal reputations and professional laurels than
with finding the ultimate truth about these cosmic catastrophes. A
contemporary example is the ongoing “feud” between Velikovskian James McCanney (who was interviewed by Planet X Video) and turncoat
critic C. Leroy Ellenberger, but I won’t get into that.
More for
sentimental reasons than anything else, I continue to subscribe to
Charles Ginenthal’s journal The Velikovskian. In Vol. V, No. 1,
published in 2000, Charles wrote an article titled “The Aristotelian
Cosmos”. Charles is a prolific writer, and his journal is his
vehicle for publishing his writings. This article is a history of
astronomical thinking in ancient times, presented as a way to assist
us in understanding our modern selves. His opening paragraph reads
as follows:
“The theory presented by
Immanuel Velikovsky maintains that, because
the human
race has experienced global catastrophes in historically ancient
times, all humanity
carries in our psyches the subconscious memory of those disasters.
What then
would be the most basic desire underneath all human activity?
According to
Velikovsky, our most strongly driven impulse would be to not only
make ourselves
secure and safe from cosmic danger but to also make our world secure
and safe
from destruction. Thus, all our endeavors, including the pursuit of
astronomy in its
grandest theories, is a search for security and safety and not a
search for objective truth because that truth is too unbearable.
That truth suggests to this author that although we are willing to
accept our own personal death and even that of our species, we
cannot confront the possibility that our world can be obliterated
and the evidence of our world’s existence die with that
obliteration.”
This edition of the journal ends with about 20 pages
of miscellaneous information that Charles obtained at a June 1999 Catastrophism Conference at the University of Bergamo in Italy,
which was hosted by Professor Emilio Spedicato and which I have
mentioned previously. Charles includes such matters as the dating of
the Sphinx, the question of Antarctica equaling Atlantis, the
Nefilim, and a number of other short quotes from various people,
including Alan Alford, David Talbott, Donald Patten and
Flavio
Barbiero. This was the first time, incidentally, that Charles or
even any of the Velikovskians have mentioned such “occult” ideas as
the Great Pyramid or the Nefilim.
The conclusion can only be that
they can ignore these peripheral discussions no longer. They have
awakened, hopefully. In this same edition of The Velikovskian, there
is an essay titled “The Periodic Cyclicism Of Ancient Catastrophes”
by Professor Donald W. Patten. This one caught my eye at once, and I
gave it some serious consideration. Suffice it to say at the outset
that nowhere in geography Professor Patten’s 27-page essay is there
any mention of The Cosmic Tree, The Night Sun or Planet X
Nibiru.
Thus, ultimately, his observations are mere rhetoric in an ongoing
ridiculous discussion that refuses to admit the ultimate truth into
the equation in the first place. These Ivy Tower academicians,
whether pro- or anti-Velikovsky, will never find truth with
reasoning of this nature, no matter how sophisticated they may
appear to be on television or at White House dinners.
Let me set the stage for my comments by quoting Professor Patten’s
introductory remarks. You will begin to see at once where this is
going.
QUOTE
“Berossus, interpreter of
Belus, affirms that the whole issue is
brought about by the course of the planets. So positive is he on the
point that he assigns a definite date both for the Conflagration and
the Deluge. All that the Earth inherits will, he assures us, be
consigned to flame when the planets WHICH NOW MOVE IN DIFFERENT
ORBITS, all assemble in Cancer, so arranged in one row that a
straight line may pass through their spheres. When the same
gathering takes place in Capricorn, then we are in danger of the
Deluge.”
Stanley Mayer Burstein,
The Babylonaica of Berossus
(Location and Date omitted).
In, and only in, ancient Hebrew literature can one find accounts and
descriptions of
ancient catastrophes that have been intermixed with ancient
chronologies. Thus,
two aspects of the dating of those catastrophes is possible. One
aspect is the
calendared day of the month which identifies the location of the
Earth in its orbit.
The second aspect is the year.
Fourteen separate catastrophes can be identified covering some 17
centuries B.C., and end with the last catastrophe, as described in
both the Book of Isaiah and in the Jewish Talmud.
Calendared dating cites the day and month of a catastrophe, but not
the year. Five of the fourteen catastrophes are dated this way. They
are:
-
The Flood Of Noah, October 24 (daytime)
-
The Sodom-Gomorrah Holocaust, March 20-21 (nighttime)
-
The Exodus Catastrophe, March 20-21 (nighttime)
-
The Gideon Catastrophe, March 20-21 (nighttime)
-
The Last Catastrophe, March 20-21 (nighttime)
[COMMENT: “The Last Catastrophe” obviously would have been the one
that occurred in 687 BCE, when King Sennacherib’s Assyrian Army was
destroyed at Pelusium, Sinai, by “cosmic forces”. RS]
The last four of these catastrophes are identified as having
occurred during the night of the “Passover”. The word “passover”
connotes [that] something, perhaps a planet, was passing close by
our planet, creating vast crustal, oceanic and geomagnetic
catastrophism.
[COMMENT: “The Planet Of The Crossing”—could it also be referred to
as “The Planet Of The Passing Over”? Here, immediately, one finds
the first flaw in the reasoning of Professor Patten. RS]
The Passover date was invariably the 13th of Nisan on the old
360-day Nisan calendar of the Jews. From this comes the old wives’
tale that Friday the 13th might be unlucky. March 20-21 is notable
in several other ways. To astronomers it is the vernal equinox. To
farmers, students and others it is the first day of spring, and to
Israelis it is the anniversary of their Day of Independence, the
night when Moses led the Hebrew slaves out of the land of Egypt.
[COMMENT: This would have been the year 1587 BCE, which marked the
previous arrival of the Planet X Nibiru and its docking/tethering to
our North Pole.
The Planet of the Crossing, the Planet of the Passing-Over, had
returned. As for
Friday The 13th, that legend derives NOT from 13th Nisan, but from
the fact that
The Last Supper of Jesus and the 12 Apostles—13 men in all—concluded
in the
early morning hours of Friday, the Passover Crucifixion Day, when
Jesus was
betrayed in the Garden of Gethsemane, dragged before Pilate at dawn
and hung on the cross at High Noon. This event also gave birth to
the idea that “13 at table” is an unlucky dinner combination; and
until recently, most hotels and office buildings did not include a
13th floor, going directly from floor 12 to floor 14, which we still
see in some old establishments. RS]
March 21 was also a date of destruction and chaos, of
diastrophism
and catastrophism, in ancient Rome. It was their “Tubulustrium”. The
Romans feared Mars to the point that Mars veneration dominated Roman
religion for 1,000 years. In Latin, tubicen means “trumpeter”,
tubulatus means “hallowed”, and tuburcinor means “to devour”.
Tubulustrium is cognate with many English words relating to trouble.
Included are trepidation, trespass, trial, trumpeter, tumble, tumid
(bombastic), tumult, turbid, turbulence, turgid (also bombastic,
turmoil, etc.).
[COMMENT: Reading this, of course I am thinking
about the Planet X Nibiru. At the risk of getting ahead of myself,
Rome was founded during the “tumult” of the departure sequence of
the Planet X Nibiru, which began in 762 BCE. There was a memory of a
planet’s involvement in this event. If Nibiru had undocked and
departed by no later than 687, then after a century, no eyewitnesses
would still be alive, and such a memory of Nibiru’s destructive
powers could easily have been shifted to a scapegoat Planet Mars.
Furthermore, this tumultuous noise that Nibiru apparently makes as
it heralds its arrival undoubtedly gave rise to the Jewish legend of
the trumpet of Gabriel, announcing the return of “The Lord Of
Hosts”! RS]
The Romans also had an old wives’ tale relating to March
21. “Beware the Ides of March.” The month of March, Mars’ month, is
also cognate with marauder, to march, marshal, martial, martyr, etc.
The Latin preposition “cata” means “thrown down from above” as in
catastrophe, and “de” means “down from” as in disaster. Including
the four Jewish Passover catastrophes and the Roman Tubulustrium of
March 21, there were five catastrophic times on the same day when
the Earth’s orbit was in a hazardous position in the heavens. With
such a pattern, one might well ask whether these ancient cycles of
catastrophes were periodic rather than non-periodic. A periodic
event is one that always occurs at a predictable time. Tide tables
are an extension of the periodical of tides, which are themselves a
result of the Moon’s gravity and the periodic rotation of the Earth.
The orbits of all planets are periodic. The orbits of all planet
satellites are periodic. The spin rates (rotation rates) of all
planets also are periodic, and thus are predictable.
Examples of events that are cyclic but are not periodic are winter
blizzards in the Dakotas, summer monsoons in India, autumn
hurricanes in the Caribbean, and the time when apple blossoms bloom.
These are all functions of the weather which has seasonal patterns,
but they are not periodic to the day and hour, and even to the
minute.
Cited are four if indeed not five or six indications that the
ancient March catastrophes were on the same day of the year,
coinciding with the vernal equinox. Hence, five questions must be
asked, and each of these questions is basic to the theme of this
conference concerning the recent history of our planet.
(1) Were the ancient catastrophes a result of ancient planet flybys from
space? (2)
Did the very first of these March flybys set up or organize the
location of the Earth’s vernal equinox? (3)
Was that assaulting planet Mars, or the Greek Ares, or the Santa
Indra, or the Phoenician Baal, or the Sumerian Enlil, or the
Egyptian Horus? All of these words are the planet Mars in various
ancient languages?
[COMMENT: Note the final question mark above. It is not a typo by
me. Was it a typo by the journal, or did Prof. Patten intend it that
way? As we know, some of these words did NOT refer to Mars. Indra =
Enlil/Zeus/Osiris. Baal = Belus/Bel/Marduk. Enlil is not Mars, as
noted. However, Horus does indeed equal Ishkur/Ares/Mars. RS]
(4)
If so, how close did Mars come to the Earth, measuring planet center
to center? (5)
If so, how frequently did Mars assault the Earth?
Eight of the nine planets orbit on one single plane, the ecliptic
plane. The only exception is remote Pluto. If a marauding planet
crossed the Earth’s orbit once, going out toward aphelion, then
(being coplanar) it would also have to cross the Earth’s orbit a
second time, when approaching perihelion.
[COMMENT: Exactly! The
Planet X Nibiru comes up from below the South Pole, below the
Ecliptic, “crosses” or “passes over” the plane of the Earth’s orbit
to reach perihelion above our North Pole, where it rests for 900
years as a “Night Sun”, only to “cross” or “pass over” the orbit a
second time on its downwards return to aphelion at Sirius or the Oort Cloud. RS]
Only once in ancient Hebrew literature is there a calendared date
given for the onset of a catastrophe, and that happens to be the
worst of the catastrophes, Noah’s Flood. Genesis XI indicates that
date was the 17th day of the second month. What day was that?
[COMMENT: This is a significant remark, which
Prof. Patten himself
failed to grasp. If ONLY ONCE was a true calendared date given for a
catastrophe, then those others which are dated to a “passing over”
are speculative as to whether they actually occurred on the “Feast
of the Passover” in the modern calendar. RS]
Throughout the ancient
Near East and Middle East, the “Tishri Calendar” was used.
Tishri was the first month, and the first day of Tishri was the new
moon of
September when the old 360-day calendar was functioning. New Year’s
day for the Tishri calendar was named after Mars. The third month,
Khesilg65 [sic], seems to have been named after Jupiter. The 17th
day of Marchesvan [named for Mars] on the Old Tishri calendar, when
Noah’s flood began, was our modern calendar date of October 24
(Sept. 7 + 30 + 17). There are three other items of evidence that agree with the October
24 date for ancient planetary flybys. One is the Roman Armilustrium,
the second Roman celestial fear day. It was toward the end of the
eighth month, October, named after the Latin number for eight.
Ancient calendars were revised when the Earth’s orbit shifted from a
360-day year to a 365-day year and that was a time of considerable
calendar confusion. Our conclusion is that the Armilustrium, the
second Roman day of fear, was on October 24, and was the same day as
Tishri 17. Scholars of ancient calendars have a variety of
uncertainties.
[COMMENT: It was the contention of
Dr. Velikovsky in Worlds In
Collision that the year consisted of 360 days PRIOR TO the
catastrophe that marked the Trojan War, the Founding of Rome, the
beginning of the Greek Olympiads, the Era of Nabonassar at Babylon,
the Great Earthquake, the Great Eclipse, the Day that the Sun
devoured the Moon. The correct date for this event was 15 June 762
BCE. AFTER that date, because of a cosmic catastrophe of some sort,
our rotational speed increased to 365.25 days per year. This change
in rotational speed resulted from the undocking of “The Night Sun”.
Yes indeed, there was “considerable calendar confusion” as Dr. Velikovsky has unraveled in his
Ages In Chaos series, which
describes the duplication by “ghost correlations” of 600 years in
the histories of Egypt, Assyria/Babylonia/Hatti, Greece and Lydia.
But this “variety of uncertainties” continues to vanish as the years
go by. RS]
A third indication of
catastrophism in late October is
the Celtic Samhain. It was also a time of cosmic disaster and
destruction, when a planet portrayed as a witch with a cometary tail
portrayed as a broomstick crossed the heavens, from east to west, on
a night close to the full moon, bringing much frightening noise,
screeching, thundering, quaking, etc. The other Latin day of fear,
the “Armilustrium” was simultaneous with the Celtic Samhain and both
are believed to have been October 24.
[COMMENT: Gabriel’s Trumpet again. This witch on a broomstick in
England was seen as a flying serpent in South America. The Planet X
Nibiru itself would become the witch or the serpent’s head, and its
electromagnetic tethering beam— poised to strike the Earth’s North
Polar Belt, causing a Polar Axis Shift—would become the broomstick
or the flying serpent’s tail—as this fearful Planet made its way
through the “crossing”, put on its brakes and “screeched” to a halt,
scaring the bejesus out of everybody from Texas to Timbuktu! See
Chapter 12 for additional information regarding an October date. RS]
Of peripheral interest are the quick-frozen mammoths and rhinos of
Siberia and the quick-frozen bison of Alaska. All had sedges and
other vegetation in their mouths when quick-frozen, and that
vegetation was in the seed seasons, the autumn. That icy catastrophe
was an autumn event.
This is supported by sub-sea level ice near Little America, on
Antarctica. There the ice is 7,000 feet thick, but 4,000 feet of the
ice is below sea level today! The ice that is below sea level is
intermixed with volcanic ash, and the deeper the ice is, the thicker
is the volcanic ash mixture. That ice is composed of oxygen-16 with
no oxygen-18 isotope. That ice is also composed of hydrogen with no
deuterium (heavy hydrogen) isotope. That ice is unmelted despite its
sub-sea level existence for thousands of years.
All water or ice in glaciers on the Earth, in ground water, in
clouds, in oceans, rivers, seas, and creeks contains admixtures of
deuterium and the oxygen-18 isotope. The genesis of this sub-sea
level ice of Antarctica is from space, not from the surface of the
Earth, and its oceans. That icy catastrophe also occurred in the
mid-autumn, something like the Samhain, the Armilustrium and the
onset day of Noah’s Flood.
[COMMENT: Despite the exact date of the catastrophe itself, there is
no doubt that material from the Planet of the Crossing reached the
Earth, some of it in an icy state. That these catastrophes occur
swiftly and without warning is exemplified by the mammoths and
bison, which were hurtled from a temperate climate into a harsh
polar environment, killing and freezing them instantly. The rapidity
of these catastrophic changes has been thoroughly documented by Dr. Velikovsky in
Earth In Upheaval. RS]
Figure 1 illustrates the probable orbit of Mars in the Catastrophic
Era. Figure 2 illustrates the probable dating of fourteen
catastrophes in that period, thirteen of which are recorded in the
Old Testament and most of which are also recorded in the Talmud,
plus the Tower of Babel Holocaust.
UNQUOTE
It is at this point that Prof. Patten’s reasoning really begins to
collapse like the proverbial house of cards. He provides a diagram
of a purely hypothetical “old” orbit of Mars, crossing the Earth’s
orbit in two places; then he proceeds to document the presence of
the Planet Mars in all of these various catastrophes.
Visualize a circular Earth orbit around a central Sun. Then imagine
a larger Mars
orbit, with its aphelion in its current orbital location but its
perihelion WITHIN,
though only slightly, the orbit of Earth. If both Earth and Mars
were to happen to
cross paths at the two points where Mars’ orbit actually intersected
Earth’s orbit,
then disaster might follow. Thus, by using his own definition of
“periodic” or
“cyclic” events, these encounters would seem “cyclic” but could
theoretically be
predicted, given current technology. The trouble is that Mars’ “new”
orbit is not like this “old” one. It would have taken an even
“greater event” to move Mars’ orbit into its present location. As
you can see, there is no logic of any sort for this Mars theory
(which is probably what Carl Sagan argued about, incidentally!), so
the rest of Prof. Patten’s essay is of no further importance at all
to us, other than perhaps to offer a tidbit of detail here and there
that one was not aware of.
And finally and most importantly, no
explanation of any kind is offered as to how Mars shifted from its
“old” orbit to its “new” or current one. The idea that Mars
specifically was responsible for a series of minor catastrophes in
the 7th Century BCE comes straight from Dr. Velikovsky’s Worlds In
Collision where he postulated that Mars was on an “errant” orbit for
a time and had a series of near-collisions with the Earth, which
terminated in 687 when Mars’ orbit stabilized into its current
location. Also, note the presence of the Exodus Catastrophe in the
list of events, below. According to Dr. Velikovsky, the Exodus
accompanied the near-collision of the Planet VENUS, not MARS, with
the Earth; but here apparently, Prof. Patten has lumped that one
together with all the rest. But it is a moot point: both were caused
by the Planet X Nibiru, not by the Planets Mars or Venus.
Prof. Patten’s Figure 2 is a chart of dates, showing various
“flybys” of the Planet Mars, in columns denoted
October Flybys and March Flybys.
2484 BCE Noah’s Flood (October)
This is the “traditional” date. It can be mathematically challenged,
however. Suffice it to say that it is my contention that this
“flood” occurred during the previous (5187 BCE) arrival of the
Planet X Nibiru PRIOR to its arrival at the time of the Exodus and Santorini Cataclysm (1587 BCE).
2321 BCE Peleg Catastrophe (March)
1944 BCE Tower Of Babel Holocaust (October)
The Tower Of Babel “holocaust” was not the result of a “cosmic
cataclysm”. It was a political move by the Nefilim to confuse the
languages of early Cro-Magnon Sapiens.
1889 BCE Sodom & Gomorrah Holocaust (March)
This was also a
“political” event in connection with the Third Pyramid War, the last
one of them, restoring Emperor Anu and Empress Antu to the thrones
of Nibiru. This destruction of the spaceport satellite cities was
not the result of an interplanetary near-collision. It was an act of
war. For additional information, I refer the reader to my website.
On the other hand, if such events as Noah’s Flood represent a
previous arrival or departure of the Planet Nibiru, given its orbit
of 3,600 Earth Years, then this “traditional” date for Noah’s Flood
is mathematically impossible.
1587 BCE + 3,600 years = 5187 BCE
5187 BCE, over 7,000 years ago, would have been the prior arrival of
the Planet Nibiru. Subtract 900 years for its “custodial rest
period” at Hyperborea, and you get a prior departure date of 4287
BCE. Then, Nibiru was absent during the whole period from 4287-1587
BCE. Thus, Noah’s Flood would have to placed logically and
mathematically either around 4287 BCE or 5187 BCE. The only book of
the Bible dealing with any timeframe earlier than Moses is the Book
of Genesis, and it is not any stretch of the imagination to surmise
that the precise dating of events in that book is incorrect in the
first place (given all the confusion that resulted historically the
next time that Nibiru came and went—see Ages In Chaos). The stories
of Genesis are undoubtedly only vague legends of times long past in
days of old when oral traditions were the rule. That is a discussion
for a different time, however, as enticing as it may be.
1728 BCE Job Catastrophe (October)
1445 BCE Exodus Catastrophe (March)
Note at once that this date is the “traditional” date and is not
supported by my own line of mathematics, nor by that of Dr.
Velikovsky who placed the “Venus” catastrophe and the Santorini
Cataclysm at around the year 1600 BCE. Nevertheless, this is the
point at which all the subsequent dates mentioned by Prof. Patten
are to be considered, because this event, if not this date, marked
the last arrival of the Planet X Nibiru.
1404 BCE Joshua’s Day The Sun Stood Still (March)
This was obviously
the day of the last Polar Axis Shift, when due to the changing axis,
the Sun would have appeared to be stationary or move in an odd
direction, prolonging the length of the particular day. As it is
written in The Bible, “there was never another day like it before or
since”. See also Chapter 4. The Israelites wandered for 40 years in
the desert before arriving at the Promised Land. The number 40 in
Middle Eastern colloquialisms simply means a long time or a large
number. It rained for 40 days and 40 nights. It rained for a long
time. They wandered for 40 years. They wandered for a long time.
Jesus fasted in the Wilderness for 40 days. He fasted for quite some
time. Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves. Ali Baba and the Big Gang of
Thieves. It is impossible to know if the Israelites actually
wandered for 40 years in the desert or for quite a number of years.
Thus, it would be impossible to determine just how many years after
the actual
Exodus that this unusual day of Joshua occurred, since it is also
not known exactly how long after Moses’ death this day occurred. Probably the Planet X Nibiru arrives from “the crossing”, extends
its broomstick serpent-tail electromagnetic beam—the trumpets of
Gabriel sound with an awful fury!—and as the tail lashes the Earth,
trying to lock onto the North Polar Belt, the Planet X Nibiru
circles around; and after a few years it is able to secure its
position as the Hyperborea Night Sun.
In short, whatever caused the Polar Axis Shift of approximately 1587
BCE, there is no doubt that one occurred and that it was caused by
the proximity and activity of some “foreign” celestial body.
1296 BCE Deborah-Barak Catastrophe (March)
1241 BCE Gideon Midnight Bash (October)
1080 BCE Samuel Catastrophe (March)
972 BCE Davidic Catastrophe (March)
864 BCE Elijah-Homer Catastrophe (March)
756 BCE Jonah-Amos-Joel Catastrophe (March)
701 BCE Isaiah-Hesiod Final Flyby (October)
At this point, Prof. Patten takes the various catastrophes event by
event in reverse chronological order. The various particulars of
each event will not be analyzed here, because the Mars premise is
false to begin with. After the orbit of Nibiru had stabilized into
its tethered position, then there would have been no “interplanetary
flybys” until the departure sequence had to be initiated, which
occurred on 15 June 762 BCE. Thus, the date of 756 here, which does
not even fit the Velikovskian chronology that uses 747, is
immediately suspect for mathematical accuracy, even though we know
to which event it is referring, i.e., the Great Eclipse of
historical astronomy.
Dr. Velikovsky postulated that due to its
errant orbit, Mars passed perilously close to the Earth in a
periodic cycle of 15 years between 747-687. Significantly, 762 is 15
years earlier than 747. Nonetheless, what happened in these periods
of 15 years was connected not to Mars but to the departure sequence
of the Planet X Nibiru, as it circled around the Earth/Sun, gaining
slingshot momentum for its long 2,700-year journey to the Oort Cloud
or Sirius, and back. These “mini-catastrophes” can be dated to the
years 762, 747, 732, 717, 702 and 687.
Whatever might have happened on the dates of 1296, 1241, 1080, 972
and 864 BCE certainly happened during the time of the past Cosmic
Tree Night Sun period; so if there was any “divine” influence on
these events, catastrophic or otherwise, those “custodians” on the
Planet X Nibiru might possibly have been involved. Ultimately,
everything that was ever written or said between the years 1587 and
687 BCE must be viewed in the context that there actually existed a
“Night Sun”—a “Heaven”—floating at the end of a “treetrunk” tether
atop the North Pole of this Planet. See
Epilogue. And the evidence,
as you can hopefully tell by now, is overwhelming. The myth of a
“World Tree” can be found in diverse cultures from all across this
planet. Of all Earth’s “myths” it is probably the most universal one
of all.
Go Back
|