by
Noel Huntley, Ph.D.
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by
those who are not behind the scenes.”
Disraeli, Prime Minister of England
People are going to wake up to the outrageous manipulation of their
projected reality, achieved through education, science, the media, major
publishers, the Hollywood industry, and direct government sources. If the
awakening happened suddenly, which it won’t, it would create great
deflation, embarrassment and a sense of being foolish and stupid amongst, in
particular, the educated, the intellectual, the academic.
Many statements have been made and written about the extraordinary frame of
mind or human weakness of not being able to imagine or intuitively evaluate
new or unfamiliar concepts, ones which do not fit into our programmed,
educated and learned reality—we shall see later the basis of this failing.
We don’t even learn from past mistakes. What about the professor (and there
was more than one scientist involved in this) who had proved in a published
paper that man-made flight was impossible. Virtually in the same time
interval the first flying machine took off successfully.
As a totally separate example the author once sent a paper to a well-known
university for their scientific magazine (claimed to be open-minded). The
article’s theme was that you can have acceleration without force
- bypassing
Newton’s laws (if scientists understood this one statement and followed
through on it they could transform the world). The lack of understanding on
this was so great, combined with massive egos, there was not only total
failure to duplicate the material from two recipient professors but it was
assumed that nothing was being stated. Anyone aware that these people are an
example of who is running our intellectual world (though they are an
extension of hidden influences) should be terrified. (It should be mentioned
that the author eventually received an apology from a mediating professor.)
Take another look at our world today: a world of crime, greed, excessive
control, terrorism, atrocities, selfishness, disease, poverty, and always
the end product: pain and suffering. Shouldn’t we at least ask
questioningly, Is this really the product of evolution? Is it natural and
accidental, the result of unavoidable circumstances? Or are the causes the
result of our being ruled by obsessive greed and ruthlessness, and
manipulated by fear and brute terrorism? Closer to
the truth, but this is what we are allowed to think. It is in
fact orchestrated with uncanny brilliance—a cleverness necessary to continue
to fool humans for so long.
(See last paragraph for the real source of this intelligence.) Of course, if
the humans are kept in ignorance, and set up to oppose and fight one
another, in other words, are made naive enough, it is easy—most of the time
the perpetrators can sit back and let the population enslave itself.
If the controlling few are cunning and intelligent enough they can program
the masses to perpetuate their own problems. They can keep them distracted
with no time to ponder on life’s values, positive purposes and its
short-comings. The miscreants formula is to create a problem, wait for the
reaction to the problem, and lastly provide solutions which will be
accompanied by loss of all rights and freedom.
CONTENTS
Return
CONTEXT IS THE KEY
“. . . We are the jumping jacks and they pull the strings . . .”
J. Swinton, former Chief of Staff for the New York Times.
We have clearly been programmed to believe that a chaotic world is
inevitable. Every piece of news sensationalizing negativity builds up a
context within the public mind, creating an expectancy, a cynicism, of
continuous events of a negative nature. (The science of context is so
important that it is one of the most forbidden areas of knowledge
- and most
people don’t even know what it means.)
This belief system of a world with continuous disharmony and destruction,
passes from the individual into the mass mind. An understanding of how this
works is withheld from the public. All we receive is controlled knowledge
designed to keep the populace in ignorance. People are brainwashed into
denying the validity of their own perceptions with fear and disbelief. Any
knowledge which will uplift, raise true intelligence and create greater
sanity, is primarily suppressed in our civilization. Yes, we can generalize
from 'public’ to 'civilization’. The suppression goes beyond the general
public to the whole human race.
A simple question sums up the subject: How does one create naivety in a
race? Obviously this has not been answered and handled and made available as
general knowledge to the degree that the population perpetuates this
naivety. The mechanism of mind programming is not taught to students of any
discipline but continues in the most subtle forms, molding the unaware
public by procedures ranging from subliminals, to specific television and
educational programs, to every facet of learning and upbringing generally.
The key mechanism for controlling a population to follow a particular format
of thinking and behavior is the creation and manipulation of contexts.
Context is the glue or framework which holds together all knowledge in
proper relationship. Displacing context creates chaos (unknown to physicists
this is the key behind chaos theory). In the case of mind programming,
contexts are shifted, manipulated and created leaving the individual
unaware. The key to mind programming is this manipulation and formation of
contexts. This is a fact one will never find in any text book. The media is
ideal for programming the population—endless repetition generates powerful
and overwhelming contexts. Denying that one is being programmed makes not
the slightest difference. One cannot know when one is programmed, otherwise
it would erase.
Humans, throughout life, form massive fields of hidden contexts in their
minds, which their tiny conscious mind duteously references; with the
individual totally oblivious to this, naively obeying the dictates of these
contexts. This is quite apart from, and much more extensive than, the
reactivity from the subconscious mind from past traumatic and emotional
disturbances. Let us close this section by referencing further John Swinton’s speech, presented when he had the
honor of giving a toast before
the New York Press Club.
“It is the business of the journalist to
destroy the truth; to lie outright;
to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of Mammon; to sell his country
and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it; what is this
folly of toasting an independent press. We are the tools and the vassals of
rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks. They pull the strings
and we dance. Our talents, our lives, our possibilities, are all the
property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE
“Oh, mortal man, is there anything you cannot be made to believe?”
Dr. Adam Weishaupt, Founder of the Illuminati in 1776
The first process which lends itself to the potential for undesirable
influence - that is, influence against one’s will - is the division of energy
into function and structure. Function creates structure but structure can
feed back its informational patterns to function, with the possibility of
doing this unknown to function, or forcing it on function against its will.
For example, information patterns in the subconscious can dictate
information to the conscious mind. This is undesirable even if of a positive
nature, since it means the conscious mind is not in control, which is not
ideal. Another example is the development of learning patterns in skills.
The individual practicing the skill creates the learning patterns through
storage of information about movements (just making movements) and then the
learning patterns act back, that is, feed back their imprint (template
action) on the input (function) selecting (and amplifying) the correct
energy distribution to the muscles. In other words, the learning-pattern
machinery does the job for one. This is ideal for skills where we can choose
to activate these learning patterns and stop them at will.
When structure feeds back its influence to function unconsciously, then
function tends to identify with structure, and we have people today who
believe they are only a brain and a body, that is, a structure. Let us look
at the mechanism of how a mind can be mislead and taken over, in other
words, made to reference an unknown (to the conscious mind) context.
Consider hypnosis. Under the conditions of a deep hypnotic trance,
individuals are not aware of the waking state which was prior to the
hypnosis. It doesn’t exist for them. The background context has been
changed. All states of consciousness are a particular focus. As long as the
sharper focuses are moving within a larger focus we won’t think of it as
hypnosis but if the wider focus becomes fixated on any smaller one within
it, one’s attention will remain on the smaller focus, hypnotized within that
focus, now totally unaware of the wider one that was previously continually
referenced for control over one’s attention.
All states or focuses of consciousness might be considered to be hypnosis.
Even in high skills, a learning pattern, which is voluntary, acts to
hypnotize part of our attention, focusing it and formatting it (and
amplifying the input energy) to distribute and direct energy to the muscles
in a precise manner. The best analogy is the action of a template which
focuses anything it acts on and moulds it into its own shape. This is a type
of formatting and is in effect what programming achieves. If the template
(mind structure) takes up all of the medium such as consciousness or the
attention, the individual will manifest the condition of hypnosis. Clinical
hypnosis is just a special case of this. How can the individual be made to
think or believe something without conscious knowledge of this? We know that
the procedure is to bypass the conscious mind, which can be achieved during
subliminal states of unconsciousness, illness, hypnosis, or electronic
implants, but why isn’t the person aware that his or her mind is being
molded, formatted or programmed?
We should add that a most basic reason for all these difficulties is merely
the fact that the human species has a tiny conscious - serial, linear - mind but
a huge unconscious/subconscious. Thus most of the processes of the mind
occur unconsciously. Our conscious state is unaware of them. (Note that much
of this unconscious is highly conscious but not to the earthly conscious
mind.)
Different 'tools' are being used on this planet to suppress humans. But to
suppress what? Fundamentally, to not only prevent expansion of
consciousness, that is, becoming more aware and knowledgeable of existence
but to confine it even more by bombardment of programs; repeated patterns of
fixed thinking and the formation of hidden contexts.
In our context, when we refer to science or orthodox knowledge we mean the
official, controlled information for the public (and even for various
authorities such as scientists, etc.). How many people, including
scientists, know that the viewpoints of leading physicists, if not in
alignment with the controlled information to keep the public ignorant, are
ignored. We stress physicists because physics is the basic science. The
public is not allowed to know about these viewpoints—no journalist’s
writings, or newspaper and magazine articles will appear on this topic. If,
however, leading scientist’s knowledge is in agreement with the official
program we will receive popular articles and television programs available
to everyone: Neo-Darwinist theories, Newtonian realities,
mindless brain
theories. The public is utterly duped and defrauded by these outrages (when
there is no final exclusive proof of these theories). Television programs
will appear 'open-mindedly' to examine and investigate the relationship, if
any, say, between God and science, but succeeding utterly in programming the
viewer with as much disparity between the two as could be imagined. (This
contrived separation as we shall see later, is one of the keys to
establishing ignorance and forming the basis for enslavement and the
creation of naivety.)
Let us now examine the methods which are being used to control negatively
man’s development.
DEGRADATION OF ART AND MUSIC
“Landscapes must be painted with the eyes and not with the prejudices in our
heads.”
Pablo Picasso.
“Organized perception is what art is all about . . . It is a unified pattern of seeing.”
Lichtenstein, modern artist
Most people would agree that a degradation of art and music is occurring.
What people may not realize is that an advanced culture is vital to the
sanity and survival of a civilization. There is a powerful subconscious
effect from the presence of good music and art. Why is this? Many questions,
if they are to be answered specifically and clearly, require physics or a
description of fundamental energy states.
What is the difference between good art and bad art? Certainly we could say
the former has higher quality. But what does this mean in relation to its
effect, beneficially or adversely, on the public? Higher quality correlates
with greater unity. Quality always contains unity; quantity contains
fragmentation.
Science refuses to model unity but that need not deter us from recognizing
that the greater the unity or integration, the higher the vibration
(frequency) of the energy communicating the unity. (In fact science will
tell us there is no such thing as unity - and therefore quality.)
Thus the energies of good art and music communicate a higher frequency to
the public. What has this to do with beneficial influences? When listening
to music one’s consciousness duplicates the frequency patterns of the music.
Now combine this with the fact that man has not been taught that evolution
or ascension is from lower frequencies to higher frequencies. As we evolve,
our frequency spectrum rises, in fact our species has the purpose of moving
from a third-dimensional spectrum to what science will eventually
acknowledge as a fourth-dimensional spectrum (this is a scalar-wave
spectrum).
Appreciation and listening to good classical music constantly moulds our
consciousness’ spectrum, encouraging it to rise in frequency and integrity,
corresponding to a more evolved mind. One hardly need point out that if the
intelligence of people throughout the world who liked or performed classical
music was compared with the intelligence of others attentive to most other
forms of music, in particular, rock or rap music, the difference would be
marked (this doesn’t mean a rock fan couldn’t be a genius - we are speaking
statistically). Evolution isn’t just a matter of IQ though, particularly the
way we measure it. It is integrity, benevolence, compassion, etc. (qualities
which can make the ego cringe) that are the real hallmarks of progress; and
the vibration of classical music will promote this. Again let us emphasize
these effects are very subconscious.
How is art, then, being degraded? This is achieved by introducing other
forms of communication; that is, non-art forms. Note, however, that these
other forms are utilizing art to communicate their ideas. But why isn’t this
art? This is because true art has wholeness (aesthetics) - also ideally,
harmony, beauty and completion. It resonates at a higher frequency. Good art
and music are thus raising one’s vibrations into the fourth-dimensional
spectrum whereas the other forms of communication are stimulating lower
emotions, involving frequencies of the third dimension - preventing evolution.
It is therefore important to recognize the difference, otherwise those other
forms of communication will displace true art. There is nothing wrong with
many of these other forms as long as this is recognized. Even classical
music (modern) can extend into sheer impressionistic themes with little or
no aesthetics—it becomes mainly technical and a product of the intellectual
ego, conscious mind.
We can see then the intelligence operating behind the degradation of art and
music. If these forms of aesthetics are brought down in frequency and
integrity (wholeness, quality) from the higher spectrums to the third, where
there is greater disharmony, fragmentation, out-of-phase energies, quantity
instead of quality, mankind will retain/develop a consciousness in
accordance with this level of evolution/ascension. And pain and suffering
will always be present.
EDUCATIONAL FAILURES
“Mass psychology . . . Its importance has been enormously increased by the
growth of
modern methods of propaganda . . . although this science will be
diligently studied,
it will be rigidly confined to the governing class.
The
populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.”
Bertrand Russell, philosopher
In what way does our educational systems manipulate a mind so that it
becomes more knowledgeable but more unaware? Again let us stress that a
reduction in this type of awareness - like a hypnotic focus - cannot be
observed. One can only be aware of one’s existing state of being. The change
is so gradual anyway, and very difficult to observe.
It is fairly well recognized that education concentrates on
left-brain
development and
neglects the
right brain. In fact it subtly
disables the right brain. One might imagine a teenager student, in
particular, females with, relatively speaking, some right-brain ability
still in use. This should give them an advantage over males. As they go
through the experience of educational encounters, quite apart from the
curricula, every time someone implies or says outright, derisively, 'How do
you know that?’ 'That’s not logical!’ or, 'Can you prove it?’ 'Does science
know about this?’ Very gradually that intuition, knowing ability (which may
be valid) is degenerated, and the individual will replace it by logic,
objectivity and eventually a state of mind which can only know by seeing,
touching things or by objective information obtained by so-called scientific
methodology.
Science will tell you that consciousness is a product of the brain, that is,
consciousness does not exist independently; that is, in its own right. It is
important to note that this is the controlled information, and in fact the
popular belief is that man does have a mind (at least). Not only do more of
the population believe that man is more than a brain and body, than not
believe, but probably more scientists today also believe this, as don’t. We
are not up against scientists but the controlled information to keep people
ignorant and very limited. Television is abundant with programs desperately
telling people that they are only a brain and a body and came from the apes.
This, everyone knows has not been proved and yet the repetition of it
continues, subtly programming the masses, children in particular, to believe
this. Let us give the reader a quick proof that they are not just a brain
and a body.
If you were just a brain and a body then it takes time for a signal to go
from the brain to, say, a finger. This reaction time is about tenth of a
second. This is a long time! A concert pianist may be playing more than 10
notes a second and knows exactly where each finger is at any instant. The
control is instantaneous (virtually). If it took tenth of a second the
pianist would not know which finger was moving. They would have to play
slowly. And this would apply in any skills but it is not as apparent as in
the pianist case that the time interval would be a problem. For instance,
anyone running across rough ground would continually fall, since with a
delay of tenth of a second, or so, the feet would not be able to adjust
rapidly enough to the change in the level of the terrain. Even more so, a
professional golfer would only hit a golf ball about half as far since the
muscles would not be able to lock the joints during the thousandth of a
second impact time and the reaction of a 40 lb. force (jolt on the body).
The joints of the body would yield with considerable loss of power transfer.
This is an instantaneous mind mechanism; the mind works on quantum
principles and is only slow when it has to wait for the brain. The universe
is abundant with miraculous potential sciences just waiting to be
discovered.
How many people does it take not to support the official mind-control
program for it to break down? An interesting question. This itself
illustrates how powerful programming can be, that education can continue to
pump out material of a suppressive, limiting nature when the majority do not
subscribe to these tenets.
Returning to the question of the brain, we can now explain that the brain
acts like a filter or template. The
left brain formats consciousness to
explore understanding through separation: fragmentation of energy,
non-resonant vibrations, the ego view, independence and individuality,
intellect by analysis and breaking down wholes into parts, application of
logic (only 3D), understanding the universe indirectly and through the
method of objectivity.
Now the
right brain allows consciousness to experience understanding through
resonance, direct perception and experience, emotion, aesthetics, feelings,
intuition, inspiration and unity, and the ability to read vibrations (to
duplicate frequencies and be aware of the subsequent information transfer).
It is not a question of what is wrong with the existing educational
curricula but what is missing. The emphasis is on quantitative rather than
qualitative. For example, there is no real guidance and teaching on behavior.
Behavior is very much what life is about; not one-upmanship,
ego-satisfaction, competition, making money, etc. If a teacher were to
teach, say, the mechanics of honesty, ethics and integrity, they would be
fired. Life and its purposes are about quality not quantity. Quantity is
only here to express quality. Quality is real, it is substantial (a
dimension of energy). The third-dimensional spectrum is by its very
definition a system of fragmented energies - particles out of phase with one
another. Mathematically it is modeled as infinite homogeneously distributed
infinitesimally small points of energy. It is an arena for problems and
challenges.
What has this to do with enslavement? The opposite condition, that of
high
unity - a perception of interconnectedness - prevents data from being hidden. On
an advanced level, the right brain type of consciousness would give rise to
telepathic abilities. (Strictly, by that time the heart information centre
would be opened up more.) In turn, this would create unity consciousness as
opposed to duality consciousness. There could only be benevolence in a
society under this state of consciousness since there would be complete
perception of how another feels. If we imagine as a thought experiment all
people suddenly gaining the ability to know someone else’s suffering,
including animals, the compassion would be so great as to be intolerable,
and everyone would immediately be prepared to do anything to remedy this.
Not only would anything like vivisection be stopped immediately but all pain
and suffering would decline in the world.
We see that the left-brain training gives the ability to handle structure - to
understand the whole by analysis into parts. Unfortunately the parts when
put together third-dimensionally do not make up the original whole in the
case of trying to understand the natural entities of the universe: atoms,
cells, organs, planets, galaxies, etc. See later section on science.
[Note that for anyone familiar with (and agreeing with) the work of
successful healer Jack Temple, who has stated that the left brain is the
intuitive brain for females - the reverse of man - it doesn’t change our
arguments. We are talking about the nature of consciousness; whether it is
left or right brain, once defined, makes no difference.]
Nevertheless, let us not lose sight of the relevance of all this to our
topic of educational deficiencies. Let us give an analogy high-lighting the
difference between,
1) emphasizing structure, such as programs (the
left-brain properties), and
2) the creative freedom, the non-rigid but
non-organized and non-objective states, exhibited more by
right-brain
thinking.
Envisage being seated at a computer. In this analogy the computer
corresponds to the mind. Imagine putting a program into the computer - a
program which could be improved indefinitely. We may wish to consider, as a
real example, we are practicing a piece of music at the piano - this is
programming; every movement is recorded and played back to aid the next run
through. The computer analogy, however, makes it clear what is happening.
After a little practice, that is, time spent keying in the program, no
progress can be made because the computer comes up with the error message,
'Out of memory’. Memory is also called information capacity - a better term
for our purposes here. Obviously we stop the effort of programming and, say,
go over to the computer and put in an extra chip.
The information capacity has now been increased and we can continue
improving the program. Shortly we again use up the information capacity and
add another chip; and so on. This is actually what happens in learning such
skills. Two distinct processes are occurring, 1) specific learning or
programming, and 2) expanding the medium into which the learning programs
are placed. Science will tell us we can only program, and cannot increase
the information capacity. This is based on the brain-body theory which has
fixed information capacity and is part of the stultifying data imposed on
mankind.
Now the above principles illustrated by the computer analogy also apply to
education generally. Educational procedures train the individual’s mind to
understand purely from programs such as in memorizing. It emphasizes
objectivity - a mode of observation and learning from representation rather
than direct experience. To a degree this is necessary, but that degree is
governed by the condition imposed by this form of education on society - it
can be a vicious circle and a 'catch twenty-two’ situation. In the computer
analogy it would be like starting off with a good information capacity but
eventually using it up with many programs, then not attending to increasing
the information capacity (putting in extra chips), which would correspond to
freeing up consciousness, or giving us spare attention. This condition of
increasing the information capacity (installing extra chips) would prevent
over- dramatizing of programs which causes people to be unable to step
outside their viewpoint. It would also prevent being dominated by contexts
from overwhelming specific formatting. Children acting 'silly’ or adults
'letting go’ is sometimes a desperate attempt to free up this rigid
formatting of consciousness.
What we are stating here is that education and science only recognizes
structure, that is, fixed paths of thought (programs). This comes under the
law of specificity in experimental psychology. There is a refusal within
controlled science to recognize a basic state of energy which we can call
consciousness that has in itself unprogrammed, infinite flexibility and
would correspond to the quantum reality of all probabilities in
quantum
physics. This consciousness could take on any concepts, any probabilities in
thought direction (but in itself is native and naive). It is not bound in
any way. This consciousness, nevertheless, is thoroughly formatted in the
human race. We suffer from extreme prejudiced perception and thinking. An
excellent analogy is taking a volume of water (consciousness) and pouring it
into moulds (templates). The water, which in itself could take on any shape,
in part to the whole, now is limited to a finite number of patterns
(formats, programs).
The above analogy is more accurate than one might suppose. The universe will
be found to operate on geometric intelligence primarily - this is the
universal language. It is a frequency-coded universe, an information system.
Thus shape of energy, plus frequency and dimensions determines information.
(The author is suspecting a fourth variable exists, which would be
orientation - dimensional spin direction.)
We can see from this analogy how a person’s thinking can be forced into
fixed and limited modes of consciousness. These structures can be extremely
rigid. The tiny human conscious mind compared with the extensive unconscious
is helpless when imprinted with these patterns - which act as hidden contexts
forcing the individual to reference these contexts.
In summary, we can say that education focuses on left-brain consciousness,
disables or at least discourages right-brain activity, creating a method of
understanding based on objectivity, on representational data: words,
mathematics, graphs, symbols, models. This is so established that man
generally is unaware of the other mode of knowing through the right brain.
Consciousness filtered through the right brain exhibits unity (this is not
the composite unity described by science, that is, parts stuck together). We
are referring to quantum states of undivided wholeness. This can be
modeled
as parts in phase with one another; in resonance - see professor Bohm’s quote
in the next section.
Note that this phenomenon of resonance of parts has not been understood in
science. When separate frequencies are put in phase - on the same wavelength,
as the layman understands - something quite astonishing occurs. This can be
called quantum regeneration as opposed to the recognized
quantum reduction
(reducing wholes into parts). In quantum regeneration, the instant the
separate parts with initially different frequency (or simply not in step)
are correlated and vibrate in step, a new, higher frequency is rekindled or
regenerated of which the previous separate parts are now subharmonics. This
is how the laser works unknown to orthodox science.
As a very simple analogy, one might consider a team of individuals, say,
working on some project, who as soon as they work operate perfectly in step
with one another, they quantum regenerate a 'manager’, a superior (higher
frequency/power), of which they are now subordinates (subharmonics) but all
form one whole. The group are on the 'ground floor’ and the 'manager’ is on
the level above (a higher dimension).
Education sets up the mind to operate in a fragmented manner -
avoiding
wholeness, and consciousness focuses on parts. This is achieved by
associating intelligence with quantitative processes rather than
qualitative. It is emphasizing the value of objectivity and ego, not
teaching the true nature of quality (unity), giving no attention to
behavior - not teaching the psychology of honesty, ethics and integrity,
discouraging, even ridiculing ESP and paranormal sensitivities (isn’t a
sensitive scientific instrument more valuable than a less sensitive one?).
In conclusion, current education builds up structure, which occurs owing to
both too much objective learning and the concepts of science encouraging an
understanding via the particle nature of the universe, a non-holistic
approach, exploring separation rather than unity and quality. The structure
dominates; the idea of the existence of consciousness is discouraged and
relegated to second place to the brain and a mere product of the brain. One
can see how close this is to the idea of robotizing people. If there is no
spare consciousness one cannot know that the basic structures (programs) are
dictating that state of mind - one cannot get outside the mechanism. When a
population is fully structure-dependent in this way, naivety can be a
product and the state of mankind today. Man becomes vulnerable to be
defrauded, hoodwinked to a degree that he cannot see what is going on around
him, under his very nose.
As a final point, since there is a symbiosis between knowledge and
consciousness, then controlling knowledge enables one to control evolution.
Let us deal with this next.
|