|
by
Noel Huntley, Ph.D.
Note that we are not wasting
time discussing these subjects on the basis of ancient and hackneyed
philosophical arguments regarding free will, life, soul, etc. but from the
New-Age point of view and requiring a high degree of
familiarity with New-Age material. Thus the queries and answers given
here will not make any sense if this familiarity is not present.
1.
The Lower-Self/Higher-Self
Duality
2. Who was
Jesus and was He Crucified?
3. New-Age
Statement: Everything Is As It Should Be (?)
4. Is There
Really any Free Will?
5. It's Going
to Happen but you Have to Try
6. A Problem
with Reincarnation
7. We Create
Our Reality--There are No Accidents
8. Serving
God, Or Serving Self?
9. There is
Basically no Evil
10. All is Synchronicity?
11. The Paradox of
Negativity
THE LOWER-SELF/HIGHER-SELF DUALITY
The subject is the lower-self/higher-self duality (and the higher-awareness
viewpoint). Since we as the lower-self are, and are not, simultaneously the
higher-self then we cannot apply Earth logic (which is only 3D logic).
The paradox is that the lower-self is 'told' that he or she is agreeing to
(and creating) the problem ('negative' experience). But this lower-self
knows that he or she is not agreeing. Proof is simply to ask the lower-self.
Let us emphasize the importance of this paradox by deliberately, though
reluctantly, presenting horrendous experiences (not for the squeamish). The
lower-self is just about to be burned at the stake, or be tortured with
molten lead poured in the mouth, or eyes cut out! (The paradox element is
not changed by karma information or self-punishment explanations, etc.)
The lower-self is about to suffer unimaginable agony, and a voice whispers
from somewhere, "By the way, you realize you agreed to this, of course!"
(With the implied understanding that it will resolve such and such a
spiritual blockage, that is, that it is necessary under the circumstances,
and that it is up to the individual.)
There is no way that the lower-self is going to agree to this extreme and
insane suffering for this apparent gain of the higher-self and everyone
else. Yet we as the higher-self fall into the same 'delusion'. An excellent
analogy being that of a wise adult (compare higher-self) watching over a
young child (compare lower-self), which let us say, is crying bitterly over
some hurt, and the adult possibly even smiling at the triviality of the
problem but having no idea what the child feels like, and the adult being
quite happy to set a program for the next life involving such
experiences - with the intention of creating a positive outcome (which is
not the point we are interested in).
A strong contender for an answer might be that we agreed in an unawareness,
emotionally disturbed, or unconscious state, and that agreement is acting
now, and must be 'found' and changed. However, we know we are not agreeing
now and an unconscious agreement is not an agreement of the conscious
lower-self personality. This is the point. We (as the lower-self) are not
agreeing but we do all the suffering. This simple point is ignored
throughout the New-Age movement.
If one states that this is the way it is, that the energy comes out in such
a manner that this is the 'isness' of it and there is nothing that can be
done, this is possibly acceptable. But not to be told, 'You are agreeing to
it' - with the implication nothing can be done (since 'you' are the cause . .
. a kind of way out, an excuse . . . avoiding really confronting the issue
and giving a proper understanding).
Consequently, and to put it harshly, a particular viewpoint would be that
the lower-self is being set up (certainly the lower-self caused it all but
it still doesn't justify the horrendous suffering). The lower-self life
didn't even exist when the higher-self decided that this future
lower-self
would or at least may 'have' to suffer in this way. The fact that a
lower-self of the higher-self caused these problems is not relevant to this
question, nor that there are other possible ways of discharging the karma.
An extensive study of channeling does indicate an unexpected inability of
the higher viewpoint to understand and imagine the experience of the lower
viewpoint. Human problems are thus not given much attention at the soul
level until this higher-self is being (projects) the lower-self, whence the
full realization of what really is to be experienced is registered at the
lower self.
One might add that as long as there is evil there must be victims (two
poles), and therefore suffering. But this is just advanced physics
and the
higher levels ought to be able to find another method of solving problems.
(Of course, if one cognizes on the causes, the problem is cancelled, but
this is not easy and may be long after much suffering.)
One could refer to the extreme duality (separateness) which has now formed
between lower-self and higher-self, and the
lower-self is not perceiving the
guidance or ignoring it and thus has to learn by extreme misadventure. But
again the point is that the lower-self is clearly not agreeing and has 'set
itself up', though unknowingly due to this non-recognition of the lower-self
experience from the higher-self. Thus it is useless information stating that
we (as the lower self) are agreeing, even though are involved with the
causes unknowingly.
Barring no other solution we lower-selves collectively should select (from
the countless probabilities at the higher level) another solution while at
this level. The process is both 'top down' and 'bottom up' simultaneously (a
confusion in current science). The lower-selves probably have tremendous
power to select probabilities from the higher levels - a product of design
and the impersonal Absolute? (beyond the personalizations).
WHO WAS JESUS AND WAS HE CRUCIFIED?
Most channellings assume Jesus was crucified, e.g., so-called Ascended
Master Hilarion has referred to some karma being alleviated by
Jesus's death
in this manner. The Urantia book agrees with this and many other sources
(though we may find these are dubious, biased sources). However, a few
disagree. Seth stated that Jesus was not crucified, but that a deluded,
drugged person, who believed he was Jesus, was crucified (and three persons
were involved in the Christ image). The books by Barbara Marciniak
channeled from a Pleiadian group of collective beings assert that the
Dark
forces have advanced holography and sometimes put holographic inserts into
our time track. They state that the crucifixion was such an insert - a very
complex one involving a great deal of energy. They stated that Jesus was
well accepted.
The most convincing information comes from
Anna Hayes' book, Voyagers II. It
agrees with the Seth material. Past information from three persons were
merged to form the Jesus story. The first one was a 12-strand DNA avatar
(12-D) who came to restore the Sphere of Amenti, a spiritual gateway (Bible:
the pearly gates of Heaven), and restore the integrity of the Hebrew genetic
lineage (hence, 'the savior of the Jews'). The second person was a 9-D
avatar, also a spiritual leader, but this one was in trouble with the
Romans. The Elohim, to distract the Romans, acquired a volunteer soul to
make a sacrifice. The lower-self, named Arihabi, was programmed to think he
was Jesus and this one was crucified. The resurrection (of the 9-D avatar)
was played out using holographic technology but Arihabi, because of his
sacrifice, was resurrected and lived for another 30 years. The 12-D avatar
completed a successful mission and left the planet via a portal through the
Arc of the Covenant (and Sphere of Amenti) in the Great Pyramid; he did not
die.
Now we are left with the question,
Who, or what is the Jesus image? Does it
simply mean that Jesus is the product of the three personages of the "three Christs" story? Not necessarily.
This is the author's version of what the "Jesus" image is. The
fallen ETs
perceiving the true events of the "three Christs" scenario, decided to
exploit these circumstances to add to their control agenda for the human
population. They gradually, subliminally and by any means of infiltrating
knowledge into society, programmed the population with the story that a
spiritually advanced being called Jesus was crucified, who basically allowed
this to happen to save man from his sins. Thus there was an emphasis on the
idea that man had sinned and must be guilty - and must continue to feel
guilty. Note that "guilt" is one of the most destructive emotions. In effect
then the fallen ETs had created an idea which was agreed upon by the masses
who by perpetual thought and prayer, in accordance with this scenario,
created a thought form. A powerful mental construct - an energy expressing
all the implications of this false story: guilt, sadness, sin, but praise
and worship to this imaginary figure Jesus, including all the great
qualities associated with Jesus.
Further to this, degraded spiritual entities - consciousness fragments, subpersonalities, beings who no longer have a suitably structured vehicle
(body) - would merge with this thought form, strengthening it, and forming a
still more powerful collective thought form. Such a thought form has a
life
of its own governed by its programming: the ideas, thoughts, information,
which have been put into it. These entities are attracted to the basic
thought form (which the fallen ETs started) since they would experience all
the praise and validation, sympathy, etc. from the religious population.
This is a huge boost to their egos and, in particular, gives them a
continuous supply of energy - the big problem with a decaying species
(caused by negative actions).
The above explanations no doubt will be disturbing to devout Christians. But
in fact, rationally, the explanation ought to be welcomed. Surely it would
be great news to find that no spiritual being was crucified after all. In
addition, it explains why some religious people become obsessed through some
kind of realization as they tune into this powerful thought-form.
|
Top |
 |
|
|
|
NEW-AGE STATEMENT: EVERYTHING IS AS IT SHOULD BE (?)
Anyone well-read in the New-Age field may soon pick up and attune to this
statement - in particular that everything is all right. But is it acceptable
in its present form? Is everything really as it should be? There are
countless pieces of information one could reference to contend this but all
that is required is to remind one of the immense degree of suffering which
occurs on this planet. How can New-Agers really believe that everything is
as it should be; all is perfect; all is in Divine right, etc.?
The failing here is the lack of context. Channeling sources, and humans,
are notorious for ignoring contexts - that is, not defining the context for
us. This might be excused on the basis that at the higher viewpoint one
could switch contexts without telling anyone and at that level it wouldn't
be a problem because of telepathy.
Thus the statement that everything is all right must be taken in the context
that it is a necessary expression at the time since no other probability has
been chosen. The existing one is logical and fully based on the precise
circumstances regarding information and energies. It is a correct 'computer
evaluation'. We could be considered to be in an information system.
The solution to the paradox that everything is all right when it clearly
isn't, is that the term all right is a variable. There is a scale of all
right. There is a path from A to B giving the optimum all right but also
many curved paths, even ones starting in the opposite directions. They all
lead to B but we should aim at the direct route (in particular, for minimum
suffering).
Thus the statement 'Everything is as it should be' doesn't and shouldn't
mean one does not endeavor to produce changes for the better. If such a
statement is being introduced without context then it has a negative
source - to make people believe everything is fine and it is not necessary
to do anything.
IS THERE REALLY ANY FREE WILL?
Again let us stress we are not interested in the orthodox philosophical
arguments since we are examining the standpoint of the potential validity of
free will.
We can certainly accept the idea that the higher-self has
free will, but
what about the lower-self - the human extension? Firstly,
karma or the
negative forces may stop one, but this is nothing to do with free will. If,
however, the higher-self has a program for the lower-self which is
preventing the lower-self from utilizing free will, since the lower-self is
the higher-self basically then the lower-self
has no free will under these
circumstances as far as the program goes.
We learn to understand that admittedly these higher-self programs are
normally ideal and for the greatest benefit. Thus in this case the
lower-self will not be allowed to have free will where an action is in
opposition to the higher-self's goals. However, we do know that lower-selves
commit crimes, etc. These are never higher-self programs. Thus the
lower-self is free to carry out an action if 1) there is no higher-self
conflicting goal, or 2) the goal is based on simple steps, such as going
from A to B: steps which can be manipulated linearly and physically (or
thought-wise), executed deliberately by the lower- self even if against the
higher-self. A simple analogy here is to consider taking the dog for a walk,
using a fairly long lead. You determine the path to take ('you'
corresponding to the higher-self) but the dog (corresponding to the
lower-self) has free will according to how long the lead is; the dog can
even get into mischief. In this analogy (1) above would mean the human is
'steering' the dog for this period or event but this is where the dog wishes
to go anyway. Thus there is a nonlinear synchronous condition here. There is
total free will for each and both. In 2) the dog moves into an area within
the lead length that the human does not approve of but does nothing - or
maybe give a few tugs of discouragement with the lead.
Thus the lower-self can have free will in this manner. After carrying out
misdeeds on a regular basis the addition of negative forces may arise
enabling the lower-self to have more apparent luck as well as the ability to
go from A to B. The lower-self is now losing guidance from the
higher-self.
Negativity is working with the person and influencing the 'dog's
lead' - reducing the effective guidance.
How can this fit in with paradox 3 that everything is all right? 'Everything
is all right' means that the final outcome will always be positive no matter
how much one goes astray. In fact the process of going astray has the
potential and maybe purpose to erase karma. How can one be free to commit a
crime and it is all right?
Basically the higher-self or God/Source is always in control (for the big
picture) but the ego with its crimes can in fact have apparent
free will.
This is an apparent violation of the very presence of God but is illustrated
by the dog analogy. There is also a more technical explanation of this of a
more advanced physics nature; a simple analogy in quantum physics in which
at the particle level it is possible to have a violation of the conservation
of energy. There may be a momentary huge fluctuation in energy which
seemingly came from nowhere. However, if one takes the bigger picture, that
is, a longer time interval for the measurements then it is compensated for,
and energy is found to be conserved (the 'violation' eventually resolves
itself).
Thus the ego can split the (perfect) energies into a duality; one pole is
the mirror-image of the other and can cancel it. But this cancellation may
not occur for a long time. It is nevertheless eventually going to
resolve. The constant dividing of the
energies - dualities - will enable the ego to commit errors of
free will (and
deteriorate) but this will continue to pull it back as the opposite pole
attempts to seek wholeness and perfection of energy balance and harmony by
canceling the other pole. All we are saying here is that even when the
ego
is taking negative routes in life it is constantly being taught by the
dualities to come back into alignment with the higher-self - all its mistakes
are eventually reflected back. The underlying mechanism of free will,
however, is related to the multidimensional nature of consciousness - see
article on The Theory of One.
A final point is that, mathematically and scientifically speaking, one could
take an infinite number of these levels, that is, infinite nonlinear
variables superimposed; each in the context of the next one above,
demonstrating the full internal mechanics (when broken down like this) of
consciousness and free will.
IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN BUT YOU HAVE TO TRY
This is an example whereby the higher-self has determined something to be
accomplished by the lower-self but the lower-self has to go through the
motions of achieving it.
The energies of the higher-self and the lower-self
are not on a one to one
basis. What this means is that it can give rise to a higher-self control
simultaneously with an ego control. What is the paradox here? Generally the
higher-self will not fix on a single event or cause. It spans space and
time; whole quantum states of information come into the 3rd dimension. This
is a bit like passing through a town (higher-self control) but have free
will not to go straight through down the main road. Two essential programs
will exist in this quantum state, 1) a goal (with many probabilities), 2) a
guidance program for the best route, say, from A to B. Thus there is an
overall goal program to succeed but there are many paths to get there. These
paths can be divided still further by taking negative paths (e.g.,
committing crimes) by splitting the energies creating dualities - see other
articles.
What it means then is that the lower-self continues to persevere and
ultimately all efforts will be weighted in favor of the higher purpose, and
the lower-self will eventually be brought back on course no matter how far
astray it goes. Thus there is free will within these large boundaries or
higher dimensions.
A PROBLEM WITH REINCARNATION
We all understand what is meant by reincarnation, and in this context it is
well established as a fact; even psychologists have proven that we have past
lives (but this information is not allowed to become established and brought
to the attention of the public).
Almost the entirety of the New-Age field acknowledges the validity of
reincarnation and also Eastern philosophies, contrary to
Christianity and
science. There are, however, one or two other sources which could be placed
in the New-Age category which do not agree with reincarnation.
The Urrantia Book
- a perfectly written work of 2000 pages by over a hundred
spiritual beings (apparently not channeled but appeared in the form of
papers in 1934) - emphatically denies reincarnation as 'stultifying'. If we
assume this is a true statement, can we find any way of reconciling this
viewpoint?
The book does give an afterlife description in which graded levels have been
created for man's gradual evolution from the one basic physical life through
over 600 bodies of decreasing density and increasing frequency into higher
and higher spiritual worlds. This could be a satisfactory explanation except
that it does not state that it is an alternative route - it actually
appears
to deny reincarnation.
There is also the channeled book The Book of James, from the philosopher
William James. This is definitely in the New-Age category but again denies
positively the validity of past lives. It adds, however, that a person on
rare occasions may return after physical death from an Earth bound condition
and take on another body. But this is unfortunate and not conducive to the
evolution of the individual. We can agree with this since it is not the
proper method of reincarnation in which the being goes to the astral planes
or above returning to the higher-self with great benefit before eventually
setting up another incarnation.
We can of course say that there is really no past lives since everything is
simultaneous. But if these sources meant this they would surely state this.
There is still another possible way out. It would be correct to say that we
do or do not have past lives depending on the context. In the context of the
lower-self personality we do not have more than one life, but in the context
of the higher-self we have many lives of different personalities, though of
the same spiritual being. Again if this was the explanation of the
discrepancies they would surely be stated. We are thus left with a puzzle as
to why these books create this confusion (assuming they are incorrect).
Since writing the above it has become apparent that Urrantia is in fact a
realm of 'advanced' fallen angelics who are 'recruiting' - to put it
mildly - humans. Thus any statement made by them can be regarded as suspect.
WE CREATE OUR REALITY - THERE ARE NO ACCIDENTS
The paradoxes and most of the confusions arise because the human's mind and
spiritual condition is dimensionally fragmented. The individual is composed
of several parts - conscious mind, subconscious, unconscious,
higher-self - which are not always operating in unison. An ET communicating
to a human could find it quite confusing since they can read vibrations and
perceive beyond the surface; they will seemingly observe a multiple
personality.
It has been channeled that the Zetas when first contacting Earth "hit a
brick wall" of understanding when discovering that the higher-self of the
human had agreed to the "detention" but the lower-self disagreed with this
"abduction". Note that this does not necessarily mean this
detention/abduction was entirely positive, in particular, on the part of the
ETs, but it would mean there was a lesson to be learned.
In general then the lower-self is simply not aware of what is going on with
the other parts of self - certainly including creating one's reality. Let us
consider three separate states to the total individual, say, conscious mind,
a half-conscious condition or subconsciousness, and the higher-self. The
higher-self view encompasses the views of the other two but the lower-self's
conscious mind is only aware of itself. Nevertheless this lower-self aspect
is capable of formatting energies (which are created by the higher-self).
Generally the higher-self acts on a large scale beyond spacetime, and
includes many probabilities, whereas the lower-self acts in a
focused
condition and selects probabilities from the higher-self.
The lower-self may completely fail to perceive that its singular thoughts
and actions are part of a bigger energy network, and that the path will lead
to problems and suffering which the higher-self is forced to create even
though it has provided continuous guidance to do otherwise. We might imagine
the child-and-adult analogy for the lower- and higher-selves. The "child" is
playing in the playroom. The higher-self (adult) determines the bigger or
broader picture (in particular through programs prior to a life), such as
playing in the room or then going outside on the swing. But the "child,"
say, deviates away from these programs and begins to swing too high, which
is expressing a mind pattern in this manner (karma), and fails to heed the
advice from the "adult" (to take another path).
The higher-self is compelled to create these conditions since it is the
lower-self's life with agreed upon limitations: "veil of forgetfulness",
etc. The higher-self cannot stop or interfere in the detailed decision of
the "child" to swing higher and higher; it can only provide a general
influence, with a sphere of freedom to enable the child to decide otherwise.
The free will must be respected.
Thus we (as a whole) are knowingly providing the energies for what may be a
negative condition brought about by the formatting process of the lower-self
(which forces the energies to be applied in this way). The lower-self
has to
learn to correlate energy (from the higher-self) with its own formatting
(thinking, acting).
Let's take the analogy from a slightly different view and attempt to put the
matter in a nutshell - even though we know there are no successful analogies.
We might imagine the adult with the child on a lead - ahead of the adult.
This is similar to taking the dog for a walk. You control where you go but
the dog, or the child/lower-self, has freedom within the length of the lead.
The forward motion and space is essentially created by the adult but the
child can choose which part of this space to select.
Now what about "there are no accidents". Initially one will merely apply
this to major events and experiences of significance. But it appears there
are no half measures. The first reaction is that it appears nonsensical that
there are no accidents and that everything has a reason, since many
"accidents" involve more than one person. The requirements for one person
must match those of another's requirements. For example, if a person has a
car accident then those who even merely witness this will be part of the
event with their own reasons. If there is an airplane crash then each
person has selected that flight to experience the crash. Some examples are
immensely complex in terms of satisfactory explanations. In effect we are
stating that everything is a synchronicity whether experienced as positive
or negative.
The physics would have to be extremely complex involving higher-dimensional
holographic mechanics with infinite possibilities always available (see
article The Theory of One). Only a physics which models wholeness - a
simultaneous span of space and time with countless actions all taken into
account at every instant - can handle this. It is the extent of the
interrelationship, the undivided wholeness which is mind-boggling, that is,
it means the undivided wholeness must come first. For nothing to be an
accident it means that every molecule in our personal environment (each
person's universe) is acting to express outwardly the internal condition of
the individual! This is what is being indicated in the new thinking.
SERVING GOD, OR SERVING SELF?
This one is really not very difficult but there is endless confusion
regarding its interpretation.
The first viewpoint, and in keeping with the 'negative' education on this
planet, is that one functions purely for self, which is recognized to be the
perceivable personality, the conscious/subconscious mind and ego (the lower
self). There is no real recognition of higher-self, or
God, or higher
purposes. This is serving the (ego) self. A second viewpoint is the
Christian one of serving God ("Thy will and not my will").
Up to a relatively short while ago these were the main two viewpoints. But
we find that neither are satisfactory. Serving self is totally
materialistic, is Darwinian, of Newtonian physics, a world of out-of-phase
energies and randomness, which we find leads to destruction eventually of
the whole. We soon sense there is something wrong with the simple viewpoint.
The Christian view of serving God also has its weaknesses. It is, however,
the next step above the serving self interpretation. There is a recognition
of power but a power which humans won't take responsibility for, and thus
assign it to external causes. This attributing of power may apply to
anything from a ritual, to psychic healing, to medical science. It is a way
of getting the power to operate by not taking responsibility and believing
it comes from elsewhere. This enables the power to operate - unconsciously.
We create an objective world by denying responsibility and this, amazingly,
enables us to do this without believing in ourselves (our power). Even an
extreme objective event such as a combustion engine will only operate
through basic original agreements (all is fundamentally subjective) but by
denying consciousness has anything to do with it, it becomes extremely
objective and separate, and seemingly independent.
What we are stating is that the power in humans operates indirectly (due to
lack of responsibility) so that one doesn't know it is coming from oneself.
Thus the concept of 'serving God' as an external source is also the result
of not taking responsibility. But it can still work this way up to a point.
The best solution is neither emphasis on ego-self or God (externally), and
recognizing that the energy creating self, which is under continuous
creation from the source (God), is the real-self, or
God-self, an aspect of
the One in each human (and each atom, etc.). The ego-self is a structure
which builds up in the 3rd dimension and begins to function its own way
according to a very narrow span of data, and goes out of phase with the
higher-self, real-self, or true-self, which is an
aspect of the God energy.
Thus one is only serving self (in the true sense) even when it is God. Some
people write this 'Self' with a capital 'S'. It is not logical or
intelligent to serve someone else. One acts as the greater self because it
preserves and expands the whole and automatically operates for the greatest
good. The ego-self destroys the whole ultimately.
THERE IS BASICALLY NO EVIL?
In making a judgment on this, one must distinguish between those few cases,
for example, religious, which consider it a fact that there is basically no
evil, without understanding the necessity of context, and those people who
have the same belief but recognize "it all depends".
From the physics point of view it is not difficult to resolve any dilemma
here. It is a subject of dualities. The holographic whole has a safety
mechanism in allowing its parts to create evil, commit crimes, be selfish,
etc. These actions split a perfect energy (sine waves in mathematical
holistic balance) into two poles enabling one pole to express evil but the
opposite, a mirror image, inherently can cancel it at some time (giving a
period of karma).
Thus these poles are interdependent; one can't exist without the other.
Evil
can't exist without an opposite pole, such as "receivers of evil". In order
to erase evil one cannot ever destroy it physically, one must simply stop
being a receiver of evil (for example, a victim).
Everything external - all the evil in the world - is apparently a reflection
of our internal condition.
If one has studied New-Age material a great deal, a confusion might arise
regarding the use of the term mirror-image. It may be used to express both
horizontal dualities (both poles in 3D) and vertical dualities (one pole in
3D, the other in 4D or higher). The latter example would be mirror-image
projections from the One source, God, of all its forms, that is, the parts,
the fragmentations are mirror-images of the source but only in the sense the
reflection in a mirror is an (reverse) image of self. This "fragment"
doesn't subtract from the higher-self - it is a reflected extension and of
lower frequency. This is the vertical duality - the lower part (the image)
doesn't cancel out the higher source when brought together. With horizontal
dualities one pole will cancel out the other for example,
gravity/antigravity. The two are complementary - they are equivalent.
However, in both cases, vertical and horizontal, a new unity will be formed
when brought together.
ALL IS SYNCHRONICITY
At some point in one's acquisition of information one might have arrived at
the conclusion that some events, incidents, are not accidental
coincidences - that they are meaningful coincidences or synchronicities.
Further study reveals that both negative and positive synchronicities occur
and they are very frequent.
We have eventually been told in the New-Age field through
channeling that
there are no accidents and everything has a reason - in other words all is
synchronous. From a scientific point of view this is initially very
unappealing. How can we justify removing all chance or accident. We might
accept that chance events are regularly interrupted with synchronicities.
But for every detailed significant and insignificant event to be a
synchronicity defies all common sense.
This all depends on one's framework. This civilization has been programmed
with a Newtonian reality, not a quantum physics reality.
Thus if we are to accept the insistence that all is synchronous we have to
look at life and the universe in a completely different light - literally. If
all is vibration of energy, which is basically light, which in turn is also
information, then there is nothing but information.
If information, only (and always), is interacting with information, then
there can only be synchronicities. We have to reverse our viewpoint and
realize that we have taken for granted the notion of chance, and totally
turned a blind eye to its illogical acceptance. Instead of perceiving
synchronicity as infrequent or strange we could consider that any chance
event is odd or even impossible.
Everything is already there in the information and thus there are always
links between parts, and parts and the whole, and like frequencies will
attract like frequencies.
Also we must remember that there are many probabilities and possibilities
which can be chosen and we don't have to be victims of a single sequence
dictated by information and synchronicities. However, in our lives we
experience many negative synchronicities along with positive ones - or
apparently neutral ones. By negative we mean not desirable. Nevertheless,
even negative synchronicities occur to push the individual towards positive
synchronicities. The duality mechanism described previously will ensure that
ultimately the end result will be positive - no matter how long it
takes - which of course implies an influence from some other level. Remember
this is the third dimension of illusions and learning. It doesn't have to be
this way (the apparent lack of free will) in a higher, evolved and more
multidimensional state.
THE PARADOX OF NEGATIVITY
We are being told that the human race on planet Earth is the
ultimate
experiment. One of the main purposes of this experiment is the exploration
of all facets of negativity (to understand it and its possible useful
applications); also to transmute and integrate this energy higher
dimensionally.
Diverse schools of thought and bodies of knowledge have given different and
sometimes vague information on the origin and causes of negativity on our
planet. Christianity, in effect, states it is due to the
Temptation plus
man's sins. 'Temptation' we can interpret as negative input, and 'sins'
simply means negative actions, or to avoid unnecessary guilt, we can call
them mistakes. Another major source claims that man is entirely responsible
(entirely his negative actions), though much of the New-Age stresses that
things have gone too far and that the suffering, etc. was never intended.
However, ascended master material has validated the notion of an initial
input - from the Dark forces.
Part of the paradox is that negativity needed to be researched and
preferably have it run out into all its extremes and possibilities (this has
been done now) but ethically one would never plan suffering. Channel Robert
Shapiro channeling the spiritual entity Zoosh gives us a satisfactory
answer (at least as a general idea).
Briefly, 2% negativity was planned for Earth's human
civilization. With this
degree one could not even break one's leg but could stub one's toe, get
annoyed or feel impatient. There is no way this small degree of negativity
would have got out of hand. However, Zoosh tells us that the human race at
its inception needed more feminine energy. This suggestion, even warning
(from a 'Divine feminine emissary') was rejected by the 'council of
creators'. Within 100 years (of billions of years ago) this drastic mistake
was recognized.
We conclude that the human race didn't stand a chance - in particular, as a
result of the interference from fallen angelics. Negativity expanded into
all its horrific aspects, extremes and varieties. We are told the experiment
is over and a clean-up is taking place. Research results? - that a small
percentage of negativity will give growth to a civilization. Negativity has
now been integrated within the learning curve.
A follow-up query might be: are we victims of this experiment? Apparently
not, since before our individuation as humans on Earth, we were
partially
the creators of this experiment, that is, were a portion of the creator of
this creation. However, one might still conclude that this is paradoxical
because of the subsequent lack of awareness during the experiment. [Is the
hypnotized self, during an agreed upon hypnotic session during which
painful, traumatic incidents are run, a victim of the waking self?]
|