by David Wilcock
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
[Updated March 7]
Did NASA find ancient ruins on the Moon?
For many years, insider witnesses to top-secret government projects
have been saying so… and that the Apollo missions were partly
intended to explore them.
At long last, it appears that an actual videotape of such an
expedition has been 'leaked' onto YouTube! See the startling
photographs and video for yourself!
Thanks to my unique line of work, I've had the good fortune to meet
some very fascinating people - including those who claim to have
worked in government black-ops projects.
One of the most fruitful examples of this was when I attended
Steven Greer's Disclosure Project conference in May, 2001, in
Washington DC. As I said before, I lost the brakes on my car on the
way there, and since it was a diesel Peugeot, no service stations
knew what to do with it. Driving through DC rush-hour traffic, using
only the transmission to slow down, was quite the harrowing
initiation experience for what would follow. Running through such an
initiation made the payoff all the more rewarding.
EYEWITNESS TO PHOTOGRAPHS OF LUNAR RUINS
One of the witnesses, Karl Wolfe, testified that he was in a private
area of Langley Air Force Base, where the NSA was bringing in
information from the Moon. A fellow airman second-class showed him
photographs of ruins on the Moon. There were more
conventional-looking buildings and roads as well as dome and
You can see an excellent, essentially
complete summary of his testimony on video here. You also see
striking examples of obvious structures that have been airbrushed
I took some screen shots so you can see
this for yourself. I personally met Karl Wolfe, dialogued with him
privately, asked questions most people hadn't, and I came away
completely convinced that he was telling the truth. More detail
about these airbrushed NASA lunar images, and their source files,
are obviously available from Jose Escamilla and on his video, but
the pictures tell quite a story on their own.
The white lines were
drawn in by the videographer to show where the blurry areas are -
but in the following pictures you get a closer look at various
In "Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain," a book that can
still be ordered, there are Russian photographs of obvious obelisks
on the Moon's surface. In this case you look down at them from
overhead, unlike the airbrushed images above. The structures are
very tall, very straight and you can see what they are by the shadow
Furthermore, there were three of them in the original
image, mirroring the arrangement of the three pyramids in Egypt. Of
course, this means that they were built in dedication to the three
stars in the belt of the constellation Orion, just as the
Pyramid and its neighbors appear to have been.
If you have a scanned copy of the
obelisk pictures from this book, please send it along so I can
include it. I found that this book is not in my collection so I
can't upload any images - none exist online.
BACK FROM THE MOON DISPLAYED IN TIBET?
Another intriguing set of clues that humanity had ancient contact
with the Moon can be found in
an article by
"In 1926, Professor A. W. Bickerton
declared the concept of shooting at the moon to be foolish and
impossible. In 1935, the noted astronomer F. R. Moulton wrote
that man could never travel in outer space. In 1957, Dr. Richard
van der Riet Wooley (former Astronomer Royal) called the idea of
space travel "utter bilge." Eight months later Sputnik I was
orbiting the earth.
In a remote northern area of Tibet lie the ruins of the Hsing Nu
capital, discovered by Duparc in 1725. Within the city, Duparc
came upon a mass of monoliths (once coated with silver), a
pyramid, part of a tower of blue porcelain, and a royal palace,
containing thrones with sun and moon images. There was also a
large milky white stone surrounded by exquisite drawings.
Now for the stunning sequel. In 1952, a Soviet expedition
arrived. The group was shown by Tibetan monks some ancient
documents, whose descriptions agreed with those of Duparc.
But here is the breathtaking part: the milky white stone, so
said the documents, was "brought from the moon." Moon rock? Is
it possible? COULD MAN ACTUALLY HAVE LEFT THIS EARTH AND GONE TO
THE MOON IN AGES PAST? Was space travel a natural adjunct to his
civilization? Are there clues?
Indeed there are. Indications of the reality of ancient space
travel do come from widely separated parts of the world. Written
and oral tradition is widespread - and, it seems, reliable."
The article goes on to describe a series
of specific examples that establish a case for humanity having been
a space-faring race in the past.
ASTRONAUTS WERE HIGH-RANKING MASONS
next article by Dr. Richard Sauder establishes the valuable
link of showing that the Apollo astronauts were all high-ranking
Masons, thus emphasizing the secrecy aspect, and again suggesting
something might be up there:
Sauder, in this article, claims to
have heard the voice of Robert Monroe speaking to him
telepathically after he did work at the Monroe Institute. The
first time I ever got the process working of doing readings, I
was hearing the voice of Joe Mason, who I had a very amazing
conversation with the night before. It does seem that the Higher
Self can take on many guises to suit our comfort level.
Here's some additional detail:
"It was not until many years
later, when I toured the 33o Scottish Rite Masonic Temple at
1733 16th Street, N.W., in Washington, D.C.,2 that I began
to realize the full significance of Robert Monroe's message.
To my surprise, there, in the temple's museum, was a
Scottish Rite Masonic flag which Edwin Aldrin, Jr., the
second Apollo program astronaut to walk on the Moon, carried
with him to the lunar surface.
When I visited, the flag was prominently displayed in a
glass case in the museum. The same museum also displays a
small Masonic flag that Apollo 7 astronaut Walter Schirra
carried into space and subsequently presented to Scottish
Rite Supreme Council, 33o Grand Commander Henry Clausen, on
23 October 1969. Gordon Cooper also took the Supreme
Council, 33o flag into space on the Gemini 5 orbital
The museum also contains pieces of the heat shields from
NASA's Mercury 7 and Apollo 11 manned missions. My interest
was immediately sparked. I saw that there was some sort of
connection between NASA's manned space program and the
Supreme Council, 33o, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of
Freemasonry, Southern Jurisdiction, U.S.A.
So, after my tour I inquired about the possibility of doing
research in the temple's library. The collection of Masonic
literature in that temple is virtually without peer in the
world. My request was granted, and I soon had a much better
idea of what Robert Monroe had been alluding to: I
discovered that some of the most prominent astronauts in the
Mercury, Gemini and Apollo space programs are (or were)
Indeed, one of the original seven Project Mercury
astronauts, John Glenn, is now an influential United States
Senator from Ohio who will be returning to space again, in
October 1998, aboard the space shuttle (author's note: this
event did occur, for reasons that are still not entirely
clear). I also learned that two former, highly placed
administrators at NASA, Kenneth S. Kleinknecht,4 and
E. Webb5 are both Masons.6
These facts, coupled with the Masonic flags various
astronauts carried into space and delivered to the Scottish
Rite's Supreme Council, 33o, reveal some sort of
relationship between Masonry and the space program.
One of the interesting items I found in the course of my
research was a letter from Edwin E. "Buzz" Aldrin,
bearing the date of 19 September 1969.7 Aldrin was the second Apollo
astronaut to walk on the Moon, after Neil Armstrong.
Aldrin's letter explicitly mentions the Masonic flag that he
carried with him to the Moon on the Apollo 11 mission of 20
July 1969, and which he delivered to the Supreme Council,
33o on 16 September 1969. The letter is addressed to
Sovereign Grand Commander Luther A. Smith and says, in part:
It was a great moment in my life to be so cordially welcomed
to the House of the Temple on September 16, 1969 by you and
Grand Secretary General Kleinknecht, 33o, and also the
members of your staffs. My greatest pleasure, however, was
to be able to present to you on this occasion the Scottish
Rite Flag which I carried on the Apollo 11 Flight to the
Moon — emblazoned in color with the Scottish Rite
Double-headed Eagle, the Blue Lodge Emblem and the Sovereign
Grand Commander's Insignia."
NASA DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS:
"MYSTERIOUS GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF
UNNATURAL ORIGIN" ON THE MOON!
The following excerpt from Power of the Mind Magazine appeared in
several different online sources when it first emerged - regarding
the testimony of Maurice Chatelain. I am not sure who scooped the
Chatelain's book "Our Ancestors Came from Outer Space"
was very instrumental for me - one of the first books I ever read
after I got into UFO studies. Remember that Chatelain was NASA's
Director of Communications for the Apollo missions, so he was not
exactly a low-level employee.
Chatelain alluded - strongly - in "Ancestors" that "maybe we found
something on the Moon that shouldn't have been there," but before he
died he came out with the full story:
"In a published article in April 1995, former NASA Director of
Communications Maurice Chatelain dropped the bombshell
revelation that the Apollo Moon Mission found "several
mysterious geometric structures of unnatural origin" on the
PHOTOGRAPHS AND CONCEALING UFO REALITY
the same link, as we read on, we see other examples that
further shed light on this situation:
"Donna Tietze, a former photo
technician at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston during the
Apollo Moon missions, revealed during a 6th May 1995 radio
interview on WOL-AM in Washington, DC, that the job of a
co-worker in a restricted area was to airbrush out UFOs from
photos from the Moon before NASA sold those photos to the
Another former astronaut, Dr Brian O'Leary, on 18th September
1994 made the following declarations publicly at the
International Forum on New Science in Fort Collins, Colorado.
O'Leary said that,
"For nearly 50 years, the secrecy apparatus
within the United States Government has kept from the public UFO
and alien contact information."
He flatly stated that "We have
contact with alien cultures…"
As for the non-disclosure of these facts, Dr O'Leary said,
suppression of UFO and other extraterrestrial intelligence
information for at least 47 years is probably being orchestrated
by an elite band of men in the CIA, NSA, DIA and their like.
This small group appears able to keep these
already-hard-to-believe secrets very well….
Those who have investigated this
hydra-headed beast believe that
the Cosmic Watergate of UFO, alien, mind-control, genetic
engineering, free-energy, anti-gravity propulsion and other
secrets will make Watergate or Irangate appear to be
REVEALING OF ASTRONAUT VIDEO FOOTAGE, EXPLORING LUNAR RUINS?
And now for the moment you've been waiting for. Thanks to the
amazing times we're now in, as we approach
2012, ANY secret has the
potential of being released. Obviously these ruins exist, and
obviously NASA was sending high-ranking Masons to the Moon. At that
level there is absolute secrecy.
Look at these photographs of the
alleged lunar ruins, taken from an alleged secret NASA videotape:
This first shot lets you see a fellow astronaut exploring the
ruins, who moves from the right to the left of our field of
These next shots, above, show two stages of the astronaut's
advance to a doorway inside the megalithic stone structure.
can see massive rectangular pillars inside and square windows
looking to the outside.
In this image the astronaut has now walked through the doorway,
turned around and filmed the way he came in from.
similarity of the structures from either side, and the hugeness
of the whole complex.
I was floored to see this footage of an ancient structure on the
Moon - I feel it is highly likely that you are seeing authentic
data, not a hoax. The bad quality and background audio is partly
from the fact that someone filmed this off of their television set.
Then you have to realize that whomever got this to the television
broadcast in the first place probably did so because he had copied
VHS tapes of it from other black-ops people. There could have been
multiple copy-overs made, covertly, since the original was first
duplicated. One of my own contacts showed me such a film - in that
case an interview of certain witnesses - and described a process
just like this.
Then, add that to the fact that there was so much brightness on the
stones exposed to the Sun that it made the camera have a hard time
adjusting, and you can see how it would be so hard to make out
what's on the video. Nonetheless, you see enough… plenty enough.
You can see a logo for a Greek television station in the upper left
of the screen at one point, and that doesn't mean it's a fake - as
we read from NAlexo, who posted it, the film was made by someone
having a camera and taping it off of a television monitor. Later
we'll read how NAlexo explains that this is what happened.
The Greek station got a copy of the footage and put their logo on
it, and whoever was filming their TV was not completely stable with
their own camera, so it bleeds into the frame at one point. In the
next frame you see a bit of the logo, and
there's an article on Rense where you see the whole logo and a discussion about it:
At this stage the astronaut is standing at the farthest point away
from the complex that he can get, and is filming a panoramic view.
THE TRUTH IS
Black-ops folks are now leaking secrets like a steel sieve, and
since so many people are so cynical now, you can show the truth
right in front of their faces and they're STILL not likely to
believe it. Some people are blasting it as being a "training area"
for NASA astronauts "in case they found ruins on the Moon," but this
is so preposterous it's not even funny.
Even from the grainy film you can see the "set" is huge, and either
is made of solid stone blocks or something that looks just like
solid stone blocks. Either way it would be terribly expensive to
build this as a set - and for what purpose? Wouldn't it be cheaper
to leak the real film and then simply deny it as a hoax?
[One of my contacts claimed to have seen a photograph of two suited
astronauts on Mars, standing next to the edge of a gigantic pyramid
and waving to the camera. The pyramid is just a sharp line of stone
going up at an angle, so you only see the edge of it. Obviously, it
would be great if some of our whistleblowers out there can leak this
photograph, which I personally haven't seen. Everyone would assume
it was a fake anyway.]
Here is the actual video:
Again, I have every reason to believe
that this footage is actually authentic. If it actually is a hoax,
somehow, (which I doubt), then, as is the case with
"Alien Autopsy" film, it was undoubtedly built to look precisely
like the real thing.
It also makes little sense that such an enormous set would be built,
looking very much like the same megalithic architecture we see in
the Valley Temple around the Sphinx, if it was just to be leaked by
some guy on YouTube with no profits involved. You would think there
would have been a lot more fanfare, like with
announcement of the alleged discovery of the tomb of Jesus.
Now let's see some more still shots:
In this image he has panned to the right from the last shot, and
the jutting area may be a landing dock for Atlantean-era craft.
Here you get a great look at the redundant, multi-tiered
geometry to the whole complex - truly stunning.
Also notice the
astronaut standing in the center of the frame for a size
Here you see the astronaut filming through a stylized window,
which could be made from a carved stone material,
gazing back at
what appears to be the lunar lander.
In this last shot, from right near the end of the video, you can
see a fellow astronaut taking soil samples.
They probably wanted
to see if the area was radioactive or had any rare minerals in
the surrounding soil.
THE ORIGINAL SOURCE OF THE VIDEO
Some of the comments from "NAlexo", the man who posted it, shed more
light on this intriguing account:
"This structure was situated north
of Moltke crater, at the Sea of Tranquility. NASA got its first
close inspection through Surveyor 5 in 1967 collecting 19,000
photos of it. It was 60m long with 12 windows on each side. The
materials' consistency was 60% oxygen and 0.01% hydrogen. The
prevalent wear of the walls along with the lack of atmosphere
suggest an age of thousands of years. This along with other
remnants were nuked for not disturbing our social upheaval.
Armstrong's heartbeat reached 160bpm. NASA's explanation was
that he was carrying 25kgs worth of samples, yet these are no
more than 4kgs on the moon. Initially they were amazed by an
array of landed discs perfectly aligned and tall beings in
white suits. This is all recorded in their transmission to
Houston which advises them to turn around and start working. Who
do you think is going to go broke if existence of advanced noble
species breaks out and we all unify on this planet?
[This footage] comes from a very credible non-US documentary,
which explains the TV logo on the top left corner and the
average resolution. I believe everyone should know [this].
[From another participant:]
1. At 2:20 in, in the top left hand corner of the video, there
appear to be symbols or numbers of some sort.
2. What is making the noises heard every once in a while?
[Answer from NAlexo:]
1. local TV station
2. sounds unrelated to the film"
The Rense.com article features someone writing
in who recognized this logo as being from the Greek television
station ERT1, or ET1.
Another 'debunker' claims to see a
street light and a car parking between 40 and 57 seconds in the
video. This is, again, grasping at straws, as I did not see any such
indications of either structures in the film. People will come up
with just about anything to distance themselves from uncomfortable
ACTION FLATTENS DEBUNKER ARGUMENTS
One of the debunkers' claims is that the camera movement is too
smooth. We can certainly believe that NASA specifically developed
their own proprietary version of Steadicam technology to stabilize
the camera for these expeditions - after all, Garrett Brown
discovered it and began using it in the mainstream world as early as
1974, just a few years after this footage would have been shot (click
Here's an article with more detailed
information on Brown. I don't think he was a part of any secrecy,
but it is easy to believe that NASA engineers could have covertly
invented a similar device (click below image):
The fact that the camera was not always
centered vertically, but often tilted to one side, suggests that the
astronaut had it in some sort of flexible, Steadicam-style harness,
and was not always careful enough to keep the images in frame. Given
NAlexo's account that the astronaut's heart rate was soaring, this
might not be an accident.
I should also point out that I have had more than one
that took place allegedly at ruins at the Moon, and this footage is
surprisingly similar to some of what I saw in my most recent journey
there, which occurred while I was at Joshua Tree last year. NAlexo
says that the US "nuked' this structure to keep it from being
rediscovered, but in an OBE or lucid dream you can travel outside
the constraints of linear time - so even if it is not there now, you
can still visit it in the proper out-of-body state.
REALLY BLOW IT UP? RIIIGHT… AND I'VE GOT A BRIDGE TO SELL YA…
Frankly, I highly doubt the authenticity of the story that it was
nuked. I encountered stories that NASA once DID try to send a nuke
to the Moon and their plans were thwarted by ET interference. There
is the possibility of technology to be found in these monuments that
is too valuable for it to be destroyed. The story of the 'nuking' is
most likely a cover so that if this ever went public, people would
be told that there was nothing more to see because it had been
Obviously, if all the testimony we've shared is true, this is but
one of many such ruins on the Moon that have been explored, and
continue to be explored. I have heard multiple witnesses tell me
the secret government does have its own large base on the moon,
called Luna, so you can imagine that such areas have now been
extensively investigated and mined for any usable technology.
DAY: 'DEBUNKING' ARTICLE BY TED TWIETMEYER
- AND A VASTLY BETTER COPY EMERGES
New developments on this fascinating story have emerged
the day after we first wrote about it. Another video, originally
posted September 24, 2006, lets you see more of this expedition than
in the edited-down version we linked to above. Given the voiceover
and CG effects, this makes it clear that the story did break into
the mainstream on television.
The language is classic Spanish (from Spain), and the man who posted
it, 'Rufus2042,' has a profile saying he lives in Guatemala. Another
copy of the same video, titled 'Ancient Construction on moon,' was
posted by "RalfMamzkei," whose profile says he is from Brazil:
Ralf Mamzkei's comments for the video
are in Portuguese, and translate as the following:
"Possibly a base
of the Nefilins [Nephilim]
on the moon, the moon was described in
several plaques like a "angar" [hangar] for
Mars and for
there is spoken also that it was the refuge of several nefilins
during the flood and which mining there took place .. [more]"
Clearly he is referring back to the work of
Zecharia Sitchin here,
in which the ancient Sumerian accounts of the "Nephilim," recorded
in the Bible, are taken as genuine accounts of ET contact with
The video quality of either of these new versions (which are
essentially identical) are better than the old version, which is now
very obviously the result of someone filming it with their
camcorder. If you can speak Spanish, please send me a translation of
what the narrator says in this new version, and we will post the
entire text online in a future update. There isn't much voiceover
but we should have all the information.
Also, the images from the version I posted originally were too wide
- probably because the person watching the show had a wide-screen TV
that was distorting the picture from a normal-screen width
broadcast. In this version you get to see a lot more detail. I would
recommend muting the volume because the soundtrack is annoying and
Though I enjoy reading
Ted Twietmeyer's articles on Rense, I feel
that the 'debunking' arguments he raises here are not necessarily
valid. I will put in my own comments with a DW: at the beginning
Armstrong Moon Video
Update - Is This An Experiment?
There is a longer version of the video on YouTube.
(click below image).
In looking at it closely, there are two big errors in it which
proves this a hoax, or a re-enactment. This one too, is always out
of focus like the first one. Perhaps that's to prevent anyone from
seeing mistakes in the details.
DW: As I wrote yesterday, the lack of focus is probably the result
of multiple VHS copy-overs as it was passed around an underground
network of black-ops people, until one of them finally broke
confidence and leaked it to the Greek television show. The lack of
fidelity certainly does not prove it was done deliberately. We can
already see how much fidelity we lost between the version I posted
above and this new version.
Furthermore, we still have the obvious problem of where you would
build such a huge set, with a rocky moon-like ground, and using a
material that very clearly looks like stone. It's not as if you
could just dress up an old building that was sitting there as a
skeleton. Some of these areas, like the room the astronaut walks
into after going through the square opening, clearly appear to have
been carved directly out of rock.
If you tried to stage something like this in today's age, it is
almost certain that someone involved would spill the beans, leak
photographs or otherwise do something to disparage its credibility.
Furthermore you would need a lot of money, and getting it a bit part
on a Spanish television show hardly seems worth the expense. The
footage has apparently been online for at least four months, so it
also hasn't exactly created a huge swell of interest.
Again, as I've said before, since we know that such footage really
does exist, as there is precise eyewitness testimony to photographs
of ruins as well as direct evidence of tampering IN photographs, it
would ultimately be cheaper to use the REAL footage than to try to
build an enormous set, hire 'fake astronauts' and re-enact the whole
Another issue is that in both videos, you see an astronaut cross the
frame from right to left near the beginning. He is clearly doing so
in a bouncing motion that would not be possible in normal Earth
gravity. This is even more noticeable on the new version, where it
is not distorted by a widescreen TV.
You can tell that he is in a reduced-gravity environment and this
could not have been done in a studio unless you had him on wire
harnesses and carefully recreated the effect. This only further adds
complexity and cost to the idea of making this as a hoaxed video.
You would think that if they were going to invest in low-gravity
effects like that, they would use them more often to 'sell' the idea
- but they did not.
>Here is a short analysis of the video.
1. At 5:19 into this video,
an "astronaut" is shown from the back. His "life support pack"
is a long, sharp cornered box-like object without any fittings,
tubing, pipes or controls. Real environmental Apollo backpacks
were relatively short compared to this, wider, covered in
wrinkly white insulating blanket and quite complex. Real
environmental back packs didn't extend almost down to their
knees as this one does.
DW: Without photographic evidence to compare to, this is not a
substantial argument. This is the same problem I encounter with
skeptics trying to 'debunk' the interplanetary climate change
argument by saying they "don't remember ever seeing" these
studies, even while we've provided direct links to them in the
When someone is speaking from their memory, they can clearly
introduce distortions - like all the discrepancies of witness
accounts at a crime scene. For what it's worth, I was very
'into' astronomy magazines as a boy, saw many thousands of
astronaut pictures in my magazines, and I do recall seeing
astronaut packs just like the ones in this film. It does not
extend down to their knees in the video, either - that is an
The high albedo (brightness) of the light could easily obscure
the details on these packs, especially when coupled with the
obvious loss of quality - which I am ascribing as being likely
due to VHS copy-overs within a black-ops network of associates.
2. Astronaut appears to be pawing away at the ground with
some type of sample tool. If he was a REAL astronaut, he would
know the tool is to pick up SAMPLES and not use it like a rake.
When you are as far from the Lander as they depict (apparently
several hundred feet) and on limited oxygen you don't waste time
pawing at the ground.
DW: This also is not a substantial argument. You are standing on
the edge of a gigantic building that housed intelligent lifeforms, most likely some ancient ancestor of human beings. I,
for one, would be very curious to see if they left some garbage
in the dust. Their equivalent of a cigarette lighter, even,
could involve technologies that we could strongly benefit from.
In the event the astronaut found something exciting, he would
then capture that sample and be done with it.
Also, regarding the idea of limited oxygen, let's say all they
found inside the building was gigantic stone monoliths. They
would be keen on finding SOMETHING of value, something they
could carry with them, before returning to the lunar lander.
3. At 4:40, a Lunar Lander is visible through a framed
window ! Most of the video is one long cut, but there is an
abrupt scene change near the end at 4:40. The Lunar Lander looks
like a scale model on a stage.
DW: Just because it LOOKS like a scale model, to this author,
doesn't mean that it is. When I view this footage, especially in
the newer and clearer version, I could just as easily accept
that it could be real.
The abrupt scene change is most likely due to there being a
limited amount of film in the camera. It probably wasn't very
large in size in order to be light enough to be mounted on an
early version of a Steadicam - and the astronaut wanted to
conserve some film for their departure.
Another clue that there is some type of steadying harness is the
fact that the image occasionally jumps. This suggests that
perhaps there is a gyroscope in the harness or something to keep
it centered, but occasionally when he moves too abruptly, the
gyro has to make a sudden correction. Also, since he is walking
in a low-gravity environment, he can take bounding steps and
soar through the air for short periods. The moments when the
camera jolts would be the moments when one of his feet hit the
Many different witnesses have said that the black-ops
technologies are vastly superior to our own, and if they knew
they were going to be filming ruins, they would clearly want to
invest in the brainpower and resources to come up with an
adequate filming mechanism. The low quality of the film could
also be the result of it being a special film, very narrow in
width, specifically designed for a small camera that could be
mounted to a spacesuit. The smaller the film, the less of the
image it will capture.
4. At the very end, we see some men at control panels
very briefly. This is known in theater as "the selling" which
makes it convincing. In drama or film, when someone is punching
someone else they never, ever make contact. But it is up to the
person being "struck" to sell the idea they were hit by their
reaction. The "sell" used in this video is a bit more cleverly
concealed, using the fake lander and about 2 quick seconds of
footage in a control room.
DW: Until you see the video yourself, you wouldn't really
understand this comment, and how baseless it is. The video is
clearly from Spanish television, complete with CG animation
graphics of what the original structure looked like in 3D. The
source video is in black and white, whereas the last video is in
color. It's obviously some stock footage of NASA guys in a
control room that the Spanish documentary makers put in there
after the film was over, probably so they could keep the flow
with their voiceover as the documentary went on.
It is highly unlikely that this footage has ANY relation to the
moon video itself. We only see it because the person who posted
it did not cut the video precisely at the end of the lunar
footage - he waited a bit longer to insure that he got
>Is this supposed to be a re-enactment of something that actually
happened? or is it just a hoax? The very strange thing about the
original video I posted is that numerous readers wrote me who could
not post comments to it as I could not. Could this video be a covert
a psyc. test of the populace to see how they react to proof of alien
life? Even though comments didn't post - it certainly doesn't
guarantee no one has ever received or read them.
DW: Sometimes your posts don't show up right away when you are
to a system like this. It can be several minutes
before comments show up. Again, without more proof this doesn't
demonstrate anything. YouTube may monitor posts to make sure they
are not profane, and that could involve some kind of moderator
viewing the posts before they go on. That could take time. Since
this video is months old, it may not be anywhere near as high on the
priority lists for such moderation, if that is what they are doing.
Also, carefully notice that Twietmeyer never even includes the
POSSIBILITY that this video could be authentic in those first two
sentences above. Either it's a re-enactment of a true event or just
a flat-out hoax. We'll have more on this issue of 'debunker
>If you were doing psyc. research, you would want all new video
viewers to see the video first WITHOUT being able to see anyone
else's comments. And this is exactly what happens.
DW: When I looked at the other, more distorted version of the video
yesterday, there were already nine different pages full of comments,
running the gamut from skeptical to supportive.
>But at the new youtube posting given above, people are able to make
comments and all have called it hoax.
DW: This is probably because until he wrote about the new version
and pointed it out to the Rense audience, the average person
watching it would most likely be skeptical - not because of any
conspiracy of suppression.
>Some viewers comments show that they may know where the footage was
taken as well. Numerous rense readers have already written me,
telling me that ET1 is a Greek television station. Ted Twietmeyer??
DW: It seems very likely that the user 'NAlexo' is the one who
filmed it off of his TV, and probably is recounting details that
were featured in the documentary it was a part of. I don't think he
is necessarily "inside" any group or organization.
Pay attention to the overall tone of "debunker" arguments. You will
often note a feeling of desperation in them. Many people who write
about UFO-oriented subjects are doing so because they are in a lot
of turmoil about whether it is really true. They partially write to
convince themselves, and yet somewhere inside they never really let
themselves believe it. They fear it would diminish their ability to
There is a clear difference between 'skeptics' and those who have
directly witnessed and been a part of such projects - and again, I
have met many of them. In these cases they have no need to grasp at
straws, or try to prove to themselves that something is true, or is
not true. They have dealt with this as a reality, accepted it and
moved on with their lives.
It doesn't really matter whether you believe or not. There is so
much scientific evidence, so many testimonies, that we're not really
dealing with a scientific issue - it is an emotional one. If there
is some reason why you can't accept it, then that's OK… it might
overwhelm you. This still doesn't mean that it isn't true, it just
means that at this stage, you're not able to handle the truth.
[Another example of this "pathological denial" can be seen in
documentaries about people who have committed violent crimes. When
you see footage of the attacker's family members and friends, they
simply cannot believe that he would have done this - as "he is such
a nice guy". In the face of ALL evidence, they just cannot take it
in. You see the same thing with these debunkers. There isn't even a
QUESTION about whether this moon video could be real or not… it
automatically MUST be a hoax, because it simply CANNOT be real. If
it WAS real, then it would destroy their entire worldview, and they
refuse to believe they could have been so wrong about so many
When you do accept what is right in front of you, there is a
marvelous opportunity to take in the fact that the world you've been
raised to believe in is quite different than the fairytales of
mainstream, 'consensus' reality. Given that
2012 is an event that
could have profound impact on your entire existence as a soul,
it is well worth it to investigate information like that presented
on this website and make your own decision without
needing to fall back on emotional crutches of denial.
WITNESS TESTIMONY TO LUNAR RUINS
Another twist to this story appeared in my discussion group this
morning, from one of the guys who attended our conference in Joshua
Tree. Ken Johnston was a featured speaker there, and he and I had a
good chance to talk, but we were mostly just talking about elements
of my own presentation. I wasn't there to see Johnston's speech, but
Rich was, and here is what he had to say:
I just read your blog on the "moon video". While attending the
Joshua Tree conference last October, I had a chance to meet and talk
with Dr. Ken Johnston, one of the presenters at Joshua Tree.
Dr. Ken is a 32nd degree Mason that has worked as an instructor for
the astronauts since 1965. He was a Marine pilot who got involved in
the NASA training program. During his presentation, at the
conference, he relates a story of using a projector for some aerial
photos of the moon. Dr. Ken was the only individual that was
certified to operate that projector. The regular technician was
During the film there were photos of lunar ruins that were clearly
visible. The lead scientist discussed those ruins with the other
participants in the room. The next day when Dr. Ken again operated
the projector for basically the same audience, using the same film,
it had been modified to hide the ruins.
After the presentation, Dr. Ken asked the lead scientist about this
change. The lead scientist gave Ken a wink and said "What ruins?"
BTW, Dr. Ken prominently wore some of his masonic symbols at the
conference. He did have to defend himself a little bit with the
conferences attendees. I found him to be a forthright and enjoyable
individual. I sensed that being a Mason was an important attribute
while working for NASA.
Peace and Love,
DW: Obviously, being a Mason is not a criminal indictment of any
kind. The Illuminist conspiracy only applies to those at the very
tops of Masonry who have infiltrated it. I've seen clear evidence
that even members as high-ranking as 32 degrees are not aware of the
deeper levels of penetration that have occurred.
UPDATE ON SITE
This site will AGAIN go down for 24-48 hours this week. We are still
working on transferring the site. It may be later today and through
tomorrow. We've had some major resistance in trying to pave the way
for our transfer to a new server, but it seems like the road is
clear now - which I am very excited about. It's important that more
people get this message because things are really starting to heat
up… as you can see here!