●Eight U.S. Rockets Were Destroyed in the Past 19 Months
There is clear evidence to prove that the U.S. rockets were
deliberately assaulted and annihilated. The Atlas-Centaur, which
blew up over Cape Canaveral, Florida, on March 26, 1987, carried a
very important strategic defense very important strategic defense
satellite. It was the target of a Soviet electromagnetic attack.
Beginning with the explosion of a Titan-35-D rocket in 1985, then
the destruction of the space shuttle Challenger on January 28, 1986
and the demolition of the Atlas-Centaur on March 26, 1987, the U.S.
has lost eight rockets in mysterious accidents. This chain of
accidents is unheard of in the history of U.S. space programs. These
destroyed rockets were related to the U.S. strategic defense
program.
The Washington Times of March 27, 1987 reported:
"The latest
devastating NASA failure cost taxpayers' $161 million. The 137-foot
rocket veered off course at 14,250 feet altitude and a halfmile two
Atlas-Centaurs left in NASA's inventory."
The destroyed rocket, which cost $83 million, had many functions,
one of which was to provide vital strategic communication links to
be used in the event of war. The "Fleet SatCom" satellites
controlled by the U.S. Navy are used to communicate with command
centers and ships at sea and with fighters and ground forces
stationed around the globe. These satellites also serve as an
emergency communication link between the President and the field
officials posted all over the world.
This "Fleet SatCom" satellite destroyed on March 26 was part of a
group of strategic military satellites which are used to replace
older, worn-out satellites. Generally speaking, satellites are
supposed to operate for five years, but four out of the five
artificial satellites that are in space at present have been in
orbit for more than five years.
The Washington Post of March 28, 1987, reported:
"Of more than 2,000
rockets launched from Cape Canaveral in more than three decades,
only one is known to have been hit lightning after launch."
When a bolt of lightning barely touched a Saturn V rocket, the
electrical system immediately returned to normal conditions and "the
Apollo 12 crew continued on their mission."
The seven consecutive U.S. space disasters intensified criticism by
the American people and Congress against the space agency. However,
in spite of the careful management and operation of the space
agency, the Atlass-Centaur was demolished by "something like a bolt
of lightning."
The Washington Post of March 31, 1987 stated:
"A four-stroke flash
of lightning struck within two miles of the launch pad at the Cape,
seconds before the rocket's steerable engines swerved 'hard cover,'
pushing it off course and sending it tumbling. That flash was
observed between 48 and 53 seconds after launch, at 40 millisecond
intervals."
John Busse, director of Flight Assurance at Goddard Space Flight
Center, said:
"Just before the rocket veered off, traveling faster
than the speed of sound..., a microphone in the nose cone detected a
sound that drove it 'off scale' and batteries in the Atlas first
stage and the Centaur second stage showed 'major electrical
transients' of variations."
Busse also stated:
"The rocket's digital computer unit then issued
commands to the engines that sent the rocket tumbling out of
control."
Busse concluded:
"There certainly are a lot of strong indications
electromagnetic phenomena are associated with the failure of
Atlas-Centaur 67... it could be lightning, a vehicle-induced static
charge and other things I'm not smart enough to talk about."
(NASA is aware of Soviet electromagnetic attack, but no NASA people
will admit this because if they did, they could be fired by
pro-Soviet elements within the U.S. government.)
The Washington Times of April 17, 1987 reported: "The fact-finding
committee for the rocket disaster discovered that nine lightning
strikes hit the AtlasCen5taur before it broke apart."
The odds are very slight for more than one natural lightning stroke
to directly hit a rocket's tiny nose cone within a few seconds.
The newspaper also reported:
"Investigations are at a loss to
explain how the lightning strikes caused the onboard computers to
send a hard-cover command issued to the Atlas booster engine and
caused the rocket to mysteriously veer off course and out of
control. It was as if it received a special encoded command from the
ground. Natural lightning would have simply knocked out the computer
and caused it to immediately lose power to some extent, but it never
issues any commands to the engines."
●Natural Lightning and Tesla Lightning
Man-made lightning (Soviet Scalar Weapons System) uses a technique
developed by
Nikola Tesla, a great scientist and inventor.
As the explosion of seven U.S. rockets that has occurred since August
25, 1985 shows, scalar weapons can easily destroy rockets in flight.
The events related to the demolition of the Atlas-Centaur rocket
which occurred on March 26, 1987 provides strong evidence of the use
of Tesla-scalar weapons.
Tesla spent most of his life generating controlled lightning and any
high school student could obtain a Tesla Coil and generate lightning
on an experimental scale.
Before the Soviets began to use their
Tesla Magnifying Transmitters
constantly in 1976, the Journal of Geophysical Research published an
article written by Dr. B.N. Turman. It stated,
"U.S. military
intelligence satellites reported sighting monster lightning bolts
over the U.S.S.R. The 'superbolts' were thousands of times more
power to about 10 trillion watts and total energies of more than one
billion joules. Prior to these U.S. satellite sightings, the most
powerful natural lightning bolts ever recorded were only 10 billion
watts and contained total energies of one million joules."
On April 12, 1978, a group of Canadian scientists associated with
the Planetary Association for Clean Energy (P.A.C.E.) published that
the Soviet Tesla Magnifying Transmitter at Gomel,
"has been known to
emit alone, or in conjunction with a Riga facility-since October 14,
1976, Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) magnetic signals at a strength of
up to 40,000,000 watts."
P.A.C.E. also reported that there is a Soviet-controlled Tesla
Magnifying Transmitter in the eastern part of Havana, Cuba.
Immediately before August 25, 1985 when the first of the eight U.S.
rockets exploded, a group of Soviet scientists "withdrew a paper on
microwave generation, which was scheduled to be presented at an
international conference in Europe."
Dr. William A. Barletta of the
Lawrence Livemore National Laboratory
in California explained that these Soviet scientists suddenly
decided that their documents were classified.
●Soviet Moles Inside the U.S. Government Prevent the Development of
American-made Tesla-Weapons
The thought pattern of U.S. government high officials who
are involved with important defense matters has prevented the
development of U.S. Tesla-scalar weapons and many other strategic
techniques.
The New York Times of April 23, 1985 stated:
"A little-known
technical agency in the Defense Department has assumed a pivotal
role in pushing the U.S. towards revolutionary technologies that are
neglected or even opposed by the military services and leading
industries. It is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or
DARPA."
"...DARPA had played a key role in developing some of the nation's
most advanced technologies (ranging from cruise missiles to the
futuristic weapons)."
Despite these facts, the agency has refused to develope some
advanced technologies.
"Anthony R. Battista, a senior staff member of the House Committee
Armed Services, said DARPA had ... sometimes been timid ... refusing
to undertake some projects until they were rammed down its throat by
the committee."
Senator Malcolm Wallop, one of the few
patriots left in the U.S.
Congress, is one of the leading supporters for the SDI programs.
Senator Wallop criticized DARPA, saying,
"The agency has been
spending money on technologies... whose relevance to weaponry is at
best tendentious, while neglecting to develop new weapons
technologies that could make a major difference in military
operations."
At a 1981 lecture,
Col. Bearden stated,
"There are Soviet moles, in
my opinion, in our intelligence communities, and one of their
primary jobs is to see that this kind of technology is not allowed
to be developed in the United States of America. And they have been
very successful."
●Surrender Mentality Is Spreading In U.S. Scientific Community
The Washington Post of May 11, 1984 reported that
Frank Press who
served as President Carter's science adviser said,
"...the times
call for a new type of interaction with Soviet scientists... one
based on cooperation by outstanding working scientists in the
forefront in 'non-sensitive' fields of science in which the two
countries are the most advanced in the world."
Since a large number
of leading ultra-liberal politicians and scientists are active in
providing the Soviets with the latest U.S. advanced technology,
there is a fierce controversy over the real meaning of "highly
important scientific fields."
The New York Times of November 4,1985 stated:
"More than 1,600
scientists and nearly 1,200 graduate students have pledged to reject
research funds for work related to the Regan Administration's plan
for a space-based missile defense system..."
The newspaper
continued:
"The organizers said they hoped to discourage scientists
from accepting research funds from the Government program intended to
develop techniques and devices to destroy enemy missiles before they
could hit the United States."
"The campaign has been particularly
successful in physics departments... More than half of the
physicists at 23 institution have signed a pledge not to accept
research funds under the U.S. SDI missile defense program. Among the
institutions are Cornell, Columbia, Harvard, the Univ. of Illinois,
Stanford..."
The New York Times also reported that science
graduate students of
90 universities participated in this pro-Soviet campaign to block
the development of the SDI. Extensive activities of these U.S.
scientists are a horrifying threat to U.S. survival. The mentality
of surrender and appeasement to the Soviets has spread far and wide
among U.S. technical specialists who have vital knowledge about the
U.S. defense.
The New York Times of July 1, 1985 stated that many U.S. and Soviet
scientists who "work in military laboratories" are holding meetings
to exchange information and ideas regarding scientific research and
development.
Dr. Theodore B. Tailor, a retired American nuclear bomb physicist,
explained the U.S.-Soviet scientists' meetings,
"On one level here
are two sets of scientists sharing a sense that they are both
working on weapons for the same reason... And they feel friendly...
There's a sense of camaraderie. It's a matter of shared experience."
●U.S. Scientists Support Soviet Efforts to Dig America's Gra
A large number of U.S. scientists are actively working in order to
help the Soviets order to help the Soviets develop their
technologies. The Soviets use the technology developed by U.S.
scientists in the development of their latest weapons system.
Dr. Andre Gsponer, the director of the Geneva-based Independent
Scientist Institute made the following comments on the U.S.-Soviet
scientific cooperation.
"American and Soviet arms
researchers are
secretly working at CERN, the 6,000-person European Laboratory for
particle physics, which is just outside Geneva, Switzerland."
The New York Times stated: "Collaborations between weapons
scientists of East and West extend to powerful particle
accelerators." Some scientists comment that "these atom-smashers are
'a potential tool for the development of a powerful beam weapon."
The New York Times reported:
"One focus of military interest in
CERN
is antimatter, according to Dr. Gsponer. The laboratory now has the
most powerful machine in the world for producing antimatter
particles, which are identical to regular particles of matter in
mass and spin but have the opposite electrical charge. The
military's interest stems from the great energy released when
particles of matter collide with those of matter... Reactions
between matter and antimatter produce a complete liberation of huge
energy... Antimatter weapons for the destruction of enemy missiles
and warheads were one of the possibilities cited by an early
Pentagon inquiry on creating a U.S. shield against incoming
missiles."
A group of U.S. scientists joined their Soviet counterparts at a
special antimatter weapons conference held at Tigness-Savuie,
France, in January, 1985. Among the U.S. participants were some
researchers from the U.S. "Los Alamos Weapons Laboratory."
The New York Times of January 20, 1987 reported:
"When matter and
antimatter particles collide, they are transformed into pure energy,
mainly in the form of gamma rays. The process liberates all the
latent energy the particles contain and is many times more efficient
than that power of atomic and hydrogen bombs."
The Soviet Union is now developing
antimatter weapons for mass
destruction through secret research - all with the assistance of U.S.
scientists - facts of which the average person is ignorant.
[Survival - IN THE 21st CENTURY Things Japanese and Provocative
Information]
