|
Audio Letter
#20
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is January 24, 1977, and
this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER® No. 20. Just four days ago, on
January 20, 1977, our nation witnessed the crowning achievement of
Rockefeller public relations propaganda, the so-called People’s
Inaugural of Jimmy Carter. Through emotional appeals to the American
Dream, millions of Americans are being enticed to let their hopes
soar based on nothing but blind trust. But the most crushing
disappointments are always those which follow the brightest hopes;
and the false hopes that are being raised by Jimmy Carter will come
crashing to the ground all too soon.
Even so, there is something to be thankful for that deserves a
moment’s reflection. Nelson Rockefeller still has been denied the
goal he has sought for so long—seizure of the Presidency and his
establishment as America’s first openly visible Dictator. Never
before has a bright light been focused on the real plans and actions
of Nelson Rockefeller and his brothers; but now, after developing a
total of nine scenarios and back-up plans for placing himself in the
Oval Office through the back door of his 25th Amendment, he has run
through them all, and for the moment he has failed.
Major factors that have upset and delayed the plans of the Four
Rockefeller Brothers for total control have included such
things as: the twin Gold and Plutonium Scandal at Fort Knox which is
still being covered up, Indira Gandhi’s crackdown on the CIA in the
summer of 1975, and of course their double-cross by the Soviet Union
that began last summer with the planting of underwater nuclear
missiles along our shores. And according to my own Intelligence
sources, the glare of the truth has played an important role in
keeping Nelson Rockefeller out of the presidency, so far. In recent
weeks, support for the leadership of the Four Rockefeller Brothers
among their corporate socialist allies has been weakened by the
shock of the Soviet double-cross. Nelson finally abandoned his ninth
take-over scenario involving the Electoral College scheme under
pressure from brother David. Thus, David Rockefeller, the most
powerful of the Four Brothers, is now playing the role that their
late uncle, Winthrop Aldrich, always used to play in seeing to it
that Nelson never became President.
What Nelson Rockefeller may do from this point onward remains to be
seen. Only one thing is for sure: Like the Soviets, he never gives
up; and he has not given up on his dream of becoming the President
and Dictator of the United States—and ultimately of the world.
But for the time being it is his brother David who is now
President-by-proxy through his control of Jimmy Carter. What we are
witnessing in the transition from the Ford to the Carter
Administration is nothing more than a changing of shifts in the one
real political party that runs America—the Rockefeller Party. The
Soviet Union is run decade after decade by fewer than one percent
(1%), who belong to the ruling Communist Party; and the United
States of America is now run decade after decade by fewer than 1%,
who belong to the ruling Rockefeller Party—whether they call
themselves Republicans, Democrats, Liberals, or Conservatives.
Jimmy Carter, who campaigned as a Washington outsider, owes his
come-from-nowhere election to the fact that David Rockefeller
selected him some years ago as the ideal puppet for his purposes.
Carter was invited to join David’s TRILATERAL COMMISSION and was
then steeped in Trilateralist thinking—in other words, the
Rockefeller line. With such powerful support, Carter has no idea how
dangerous a position he is now in. Already a “Carter Watergate” is
brewing to cut him down; and, worst of all, the threat of war hangs
over everything he does.
In his Inaugural Address, Carter expressed a preoccupation with war;
and for the past several weeks the American public has been under an
avalanche of warnings about the Soviet military threat, including
statements that the Soviets are now preparing for war. This is a
complete turnabout from the virtual ban on anti-Soviet news that was
in force in the controlled major media until very recently; and the
excuse that has been provided for all these new warnings is a new
study of Intelligence information that was launched last summer as
soon as it was learned that the Soviet Union was planting offensive
missiles in our waters. The threat of war, my friends, is very real;
but the intent of the controlled major media in relaying these
warnings to you now is another matter. We are now being
psychologically conditioned to accept a “Declaration of National
Emergency” when the time is ripe, and to submit to the dictatorial
controls it will impose. The drive to merge the United States with
the Soviet Union to form an all-powerful World Government has
already cost us two World Wars plus Korea and Vietnam. Now, we are
once again in a pre-war situation, on the brink of NUCLEAR WAR ONE;
and for reasons I can now reveal, the Four Rockefeller Brothers
still believe they can succeed in bending the coming nuclear war to
their own purposes.
My three special topics for today are:
-
Topic #1-- HENRY FORD’S
PARTING CRITICISM OF THE LARGEST FOUNDATION IN THE WORLD
-
Topic #2-- THE CURRENT
PRE-WAR HOSTILITIES THAT ARE LEADING UP TO NUCLEAR WAR ONE
-
Topic #3-- THE GREAT
SECRET RACE IN SUPER WEAPONS.
Topic #1
--One year ago in monthly AUDIO LETTER
No. 8, I publicly revealed for the very first time the supersecret
White House merge directive. Under this directive our lives in
America are to be so altered that we can be comfortably merged with
the Soviet Union. And since last spring I have also been drawing
your attention to the little known but central role that the major
tax-free Foundations have played for two generations and more to
push our nation in the same direction. Last month I was able to
reveal one of my sources of information about the Foundations—my
friend, Mr. Norman Dodd, and to repeat for you his own words about
the clandestine role they have played in progressively destroying
the America that was created by our Founding Fathers. Mr. Dodd’s
story is incredible, but it is also based upon painstaking,
carefully documented research which he directed with the Congress of
the United States. As one of America’s foremost authorities on
Foundations, Norman Dodd is a man whose words carry a great deal of
weight. But since last April I have also been informed anew that
there is a contingent among the present-day Trustees of these
Foundations who are becoming increasingly worried about the
direction in which they are taking us. Even before the Soviet
underwater missile crisis materialized last summer, their fears of a
Soviet double-cross were mounting rapidly. And now, no less than
Henry Ford II has resigned in dissatisfaction as a Trustee of the
biggest Foundation in the world—the Ford Foundation; and he has
warned in a criticizing letter that a change in direction would be
wise to consider.
In his resignation letter of January 11, 1977, he said in part, and
I quote:
“The Foundation exists and thrives
on the fruits of our economic system. The dividends of
competitive enterprise make it all possible. A significant
portion of the abundance created by United States business
enables the Foundation and like institutions to carry on their
work. In effect, the Foundation is a creature of capitalism—a
statement that I am sure would be shocking to many professional
staff people in the field of philanthropy. It is hard to discern
recognition of this fact in anything the Foundation does. It is
even more difficult to find an understanding of this in many of
the institutions, particularly the universities, that are the
beneficiaries of the Foundation’s grant programs.”
Shortly thereafter he continues, and I
quote:
“I am just suggesting to the
Trustees and the staff that the system that makes the Foundation
possible very probably is worth preserving. Perhaps it’s time
for the Trustees and staff to examine the question of our
obligations to our economic system; and to consider how the
Foundation, as one of the system’s most prominent offspring,
might act most wisely to strengthen and improve its progenitor.”
If you are not aware of the concerted
drive toward collectivism that has been promoted for decades by the
major Foundations, these words of Henry Ford II may surprise you.
Even so, you may be even more surprised at the reactions of the
major Foundations to his criticisms. Almost universally their
bitterest reactions had to do with Ford’s defense of free
competitive enterprise.
For example, consider the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace. In AUDIO LETTER No. 19 last month you heard of the chilling
role the Carnegie Endowment has played since 1909 in altering
America’s national life through warfare and twisting our education.
When a high official of the Carnegie Endowment was asked for his
comments on Henry Ford’s letter of resignation, he reacted in the
scornful words, “Is that what the Ford Foundation is set up for—to
promote free enterprise?” He was very upset at the mention of free
enterprise—the indispensable foundation of Freedom itself.
Henry Ford II is not alone. Those Foundation trustees who insist
upon continuing the suicidal drive toward collectivism under the
long-time commitment for a One World Government are trying to put
down all dissent within their ranks. But Henry Ford II has
courageously shown the way, and we can hope for others to follow.
Topic #2--In all the major wars of this century involving the United
States, undeclared warfare has been a consistent pattern. In the
cases of Korea and Vietnam, in fact, the entire wars were
undeclared. In the cases of World Wars I and II, undeclared warfare
and provocations preceded the formal outbreak of war and marked the
time period in each case that has since been called “pre-war.”
In that sense, we are now living in the pre-war days that are
leading up to NUCLEAR WAR ONE here in America! But as we are living
out the days of the pre-NUCLEAR WAR ONE period, undeclared
hostilities have reached a level unparalleled in the past. Consider
first the repeated plutonium cloud attacks which have been mounted
on the United States by Soviet submarines in recent months. As I
have related in previous monthly AUDIO LETTERS, the first such
attack was mounted in early October 1976 by Soviet submarines
deployed along the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf coasts of the United
States. Based on the results from that first full-scale experiment
on our country, Soviet chemical warfare specialists concluded that
subsequent plutonium cloud attacks could be mounted most efficiently
from stations along the Northwest Coast.
In late November 1976, a second experimental attack was mounted to
test this out; and while it was not completely successful from the
Soviet viewpoint, it provided all the additional data they needed.
Both of these experimental plutonium cloud attacks by the Soviet
Union were accompanied by convenient cover announcements by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA, to the
effect that radioactive clouds from Chinese nuclear blasts would be
passing over us. Thus an explanation was readily available should
something unexpectedly severe happen—but it did not.
And on December 13, 1976, as I reported last month, 21 Soviet
submarines loaded with plutonium poison to inject into our
atmosphere arrived on station along the Northwest Coast of the
United States. This time, my friends, experimentation was no longer
the goal. Certain individuals in the United States Government knew
they were there, and knew why, but did nothing whatsoever to
interfere with their mission.
As of December 31, 1976, 13 of the 21 subs had emptied their load
into our atmosphere and headed out to sea, having timed their attack
to make optimum use of severe winter storm conditions across the
United States. The other 8 subs remained behind to reinforce the
main plutonium cloud by continuing to feed it periodically over a
period of days. Finally on January 3, 1977, these 8 Soviet subs also
departed out to sea, having emptied their loads into our atmosphere.
According to my own Intelligence sources, this third and latest
plutonium cloud attack by the Soviet Union was very effective. The
Soviets did achieve a very broad dispersal of the plutonium poison
throughout the continental United States. This, on top of the record
cold weather blanketing most of the United States lately, may well
lead to an outbreak of flu-like sicknesses in the near future, to
which the Government has been conditioning us now for nearly a year.
Undeclared warfare by the Soviet Union is also continuing by means
of the short-range underwater-launch missiles which have been
planted in our waters by the Soviet Union ready for use in a
surprise attack. Last month I revealed that 93 such missiles were in
place in American waters, and I gave the navigational coordinates
for nine of them which were surrounding the Island of Oahu, where
Pearl Harbor is located.
I can now report that the United States Navy did remove all nine of
these missiles, completing the operation on December 31, 1976. But
four Soviet submarines were on hand to observe the complete missile
removal operation by our Navy; and as of January 17, just one week
ago, two new Soviet missiles were already in place, threatening
Pearl Harbor again. In addition, four other Soviet missiles have
been planted since I recorded monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 19 last
month—two in Alaskan waters, the other two on the West Coast. This
brings the total back up to 90 as of now. My disclosures last month
demonstrated to certain persons that I am not bluffing, that the
United States is indeed targeted by a massive new round of Soviet
underwater nuclear missiles. But for the reasons I gave two months
ago in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 18 for November, 1976, I do not
intend to reveal the rest of the missile locations merely to have
them wasted in the deadly cat-and-mouse game now under way. Instead,
my own Intelligence sources have made it crystal clear that only
public exposure of the truth about this whole deadly matter has any
hope of stopping the coming war. For that reason I have already
launched efforts through a number of indirect channels which lie
outside the Rockefeller sphere of control in an attempt to bring
about this public exposure.
If full-fledged war does come, my friends, America is in for a wide
range of nasty military surprises. In certain areas Soviet
approaches to military technology are far different from our
own—such as in the field of anti-submarine warfare.
One field in which they are literally decades ahead of the United
States is in the area of microwaves as they affect human
beings. Since early December the Soviet Union has been conducting a
major experimental test program on a new
satellite-based system that uses microwaves to directly affect the
behavior of humans. The test victims: the crews of selected tankers
and freighters in and near American waters. Soviet researchers
discovered long ago that prolonged exposure to microwaves, even at
intensities considered “safe” in the United States, can produce a
long list of effects on people. These range from dizziness and
irritability to emotional instability and alteration of brain wave
patterns, as well as other effects. Starting from these findings,
Soviet scientists have developed microwave bombardment techniques
which have the basic effect of greatly reducing a person’s capacity
for exercising judgment and fully comprehending facts at his
disposal. A person under such bombardment, in other words, is very
prone to make mistakes, serious mistakes. On December 15, 1976, the
Liberian tanker Argo Merchant went aground on the Nantucket shoals
off Cape Cod, and the resulting oil spill of 7-1/2 million gallons
was the worst to date in American history.
Many things were strange about the
incident—such as the fact that the Nantucket shoals are a very well
known navigational hazard, and the Argo Merchant was many miles off
course. Hearings later revealed that the ship’s navigational gear
was not in proper condition, but strange behavior by the crew itself
went unexplained. The Argo Merchant was then followed by a rash of
tanker incidents in and near American waters; and in almost every
case, errors of judgment were either primary or contributing
factors. It was a bad month for the Coast Guard; but it was worst of
all for the 38 nationalist Chinese crewmen of the tanker Grand
Zenith, which was lost at sea off the New England coast with over
8-million gallons of heavy fuel oil aboard. On December 30, 1976,
the Zenith reported its position as about 60 miles south of
Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. It was never heard from again. Several days
later, after the ship failed to arrive at its destination, the Coast
Guard began a search for the missing ship. However it was noticed
that the last position reported by the Zenith was so far north of
its planned course that it did not seem to make sense. As a result,
the search was shifted to a seemingly more likely area far to the
south of that location.
The story of the Grand Zenith is a tragic one, my friends. But it
might have been less tragic had the Coast Guard taken the last
position report by the Captain of the Grand Zenith more seriously
and anchored search operations on that position, because on January
7, 1977, I received Intelligence information to the effect that the
location of the sunken Grand Zenith was approximately 43 degrees 5
minutes North, 67 degrees 52 minutes West. Furthermore, my
information indicated that as of that time there were still
survivors in the immediate vicinity of the sinking.
It was urgent that this be brought to the attention of the Coast
Guard without delay. The search had already been narrowed down to
the wrong area—over 200 miles to the southeast of the correct
position—based on the finding of two life jackets bearing the name
Grand Zenith. I immediately contacted the J. F. Moran Company in
Providence, Rhode Island (the ship’s agent in New England), and gave
them the information. They passed it on to the Coast Guard—but there
it stopped!
For days I tried directly and indirectly to get someone to check out
the location I had been given. On January 10 I
contacted the Coast Guard directly to see what had been done. I was
informed that no attempt whatever had been made to check out my
report, and that no attempt was going to be made!! Instead the same
fruitless area 300 miles east of Cape Cod was searched day after day
for a week with no hope whatsoever of finding the survivors.
Meanwhile I could not persuade the Coast Guard even to make a single
flight over the actual site of the sinking in order to check out my
report.
The same information was also given to the Navy after the Coast
Guard refused to investigate; and the Navy, too, refused to check it
out. Had either the Navy or the Coast Guard checked the information
I gave them about the Grand Zenith, they would have found it to be
true, and that would have demonstrated to the public at large that
my Intelligence sources about matters like this are extremely
accurate.
My Intelligence sources had hoped that this would be exactly the
outcome of my relaying the life-saving information about the Grand
Zenith. But, my friends, the TRUTH has many enemies. Topic #3--The
brain-scrambling microwave weapons which are now entering
operational status in the Soviet arsenal are just one example of a
whole new generation of superweapons which are now under development
in a secret arms race. The participants in this race are none other
than the Corporate Socialist Rockefeller cartel on the one hand, and
the State Socialists of the Soviet Union on the other. Thus, while
they are allies in the drive to take over the rest of the world,
there remains a tension of rivalry between the two.
Each would like to achieve clear
supremacy over the other, and each is trying to prevent the other
from achieving such supremacy. Caught in the middle as both pawn and
prize is the United States of America with her people, her
resources, and her industrial and military establishment. We
continually hear about the military relationship between the Soviet
Union and the United States, but the real arms struggle is between
the Soviet Union and the Rockefeller empire—and it is a well kept
secret.
Weapons which are under normal official Defense Department control
in this country are always compared with weapons which enjoy a
similar officially acknowledged status in the Soviet Union. Thus
military planners think in terms of Soviet Backfire Bombers versus
the American B-1 Bomber; Soviet missiles and missile-firing
submarines versus their counterparts; and new developments such as
Cruise Missiles which, by the way, are not actually a basic new
concept at all. All of these things are real and important factors
in the military equation. But there is another layer of weaponry
that you have never heard about, yet which is crucial to the real
power balance between the Rockefeller and Soviet empires. This is
the realm of the secret arms race in highly advanced super weapons.
This realm is completely unaffected by
SALT treaties or other treaties, and involves a continual jockeying
for pure raw power! Thus, for example, timid reports are just
beginning to be made public about the possibilities that lasers
might be used to blind military satellites, and that some day far in
the future they might even be developed into death rays like those
of Science Fiction. As for operational weapons in the supersecret
category, the Soviet underwater nuclear missiles that now infest our
waters and the sonar-absorbing mini-submarines which are used to
plant them are good examples.
One of the puzzling things to me until recently was the incredible
“Red Friday Agreement” of October 1, 1976, whereby the Rockefeller
Brothers pledged, through President Ford, not to harass the Soviet
submarines planting missiles in our waters.
Even more puzzling has been the absence of a Soviet ultimatum or
surprise attack so far, given our heavy coastal targeting with these
missiles. But now, I can give you the answers. When I first revealed
the locations of Soviet underwater missiles around the world in
monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 15 last August, I did so with the knowledge
that a planned world-wide Soviet surprise attack was imminent, and
that public exposure was the only thing that could prevent it. Now I
know more fully why the surprise element was so crucial to the
double-cross embarked upon by the Soviet Union. The Soviets were
trying to prepare and launch the attack before an awesome weapons
system that is under direct Rockefeller control could be activated;
but ever since that surprise was ruined, they have been forced to
bide their time while they watch for another opportunity to catch
the Rockefeller empire in a vulnerable moment.
Meanwhile a standoff is being maintained between the Soviet
underwater missiles and the Rockefeller superweapons system I am
about to tell you about. At the same time, Rockefeller propaganda is
being used to rapidly wash away the idea of East-West detente in a
flood of warnings about the Soviet threat and possible war. The
purpose of it all is to lead up to a “Declaration of National
Emergency”, as I have already warned. Finally, NUCLEAR WAR ONE is
programmed to come. The purpose of the Rockefeller superweapons is
not to prevent this war. These superweapons are only a club over the
head of the Soviets to insure that the war goes according to plan.
This includes Soviet adherence to the “Nuclear Safe Zone” which was
established by secret agreement to protect the Rockefeller Brothers
and their intimates.
I was first alerted to the existence of the Rockefeller superweapons
system as the result of my press release which was sent out to
nearly 11,000 newspapers in the United States late in October in
connection with the release of monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 17. The
press release called attention to the pivotal role General George S.
Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had played in
preventing a surprise attack by means of Soviet underwater missiles.
On November 17, 1976, one of my associates received a call from a
Mr. Tony Hodges, a prominent environmentalist who lives in Honolulu.
Mr. Hodges had been given a copy of the press release, and called to
find out more about it. He had good reason to be interested because
nearly a year earlier, unbenoticed to my associates or myself, he
had delivered a 47-page warning document to the ambassadors of more
than 50 countries who had signed the 1971 Seabeds Arms Control
Treaty. In this warning document Mr. Hodges alerted the reader to,
quote:
“Probable violations by the USA and
the USSR of the 1971 Seabeds Arms Control Treaty.”
He was careful to make clear that the
material contained in the document did not prove his suspicions that
undersea weapons of the sort banned by the treaty had been deployed
by either the United States or the Soviet Union. Nevertheless he did
explain in considerable detail why such weapons, such as missiles
and undersea silos, would be militarily desirable; and he also
presented the statements of several extremely highly qualified
experts in this field of technology contending that such undersea
missile systems are feasible.
One of these authorities is Dr. John P. Craven, who is presently
(Jan. 1977) the dean of Marine Programs for the University of Hawaii
as well as Marine Affairs Coordinator for the State of Hawaii.
Formerly he was Chief Scientist on United States Navy projects which
involved both the development of this nation’s submarine-launched
ballistic missile system and deep submersibles. He is also an
attorney specializing in Marine Law, and at last report continued to
be a high-level consultant to the Department of Defense.
In his warning document, Mr. Hodges lists the impressive credentials
of Dr. Craven in more detail, and also presents voluminous notes on
a conversation he had with Dr. Craven in November 1975 about the
subject of undersea missiles. The entire Craven interview as
reported in the Hodges warning document provides a great deal of
insight into the whole subject of undersea missiles, which are
discussed throughout as being sealed inside a protective capsule
while they dwell in their hiding places beneath the sea. At no point
did Dr. Craven admit to knowing of the actual existence of any such
system; but according to the report of Mr. Hodges, the feasibility
of such undersea missiles was strongly confirmed by Dr. Craven. To
illustrate this, I will now quote from page 26 of the Hodges warning
document—Notes C-29 through C-31, quote:
“Craven said he could develop a
total weapons system to do what I suggested in a maximum of four
(4) years, longer if it needed to be clandestine.
The above is an enormously important statement by Craven, since
the author believes that Craven was intimately involved in the
development of the systems noted in this warning document. The
figure Craven gave for carrying out the system development in
total secrecy, such as has been done, was seven (7) years. This
is significant because it is believed that the program to place
nuclear weapons on and within the seabed was begun in 1968 while
Craven was still chief scientist of the Navy’s Strategic Systems
project and its Deep Submergence Systems project.
The seabed silos and the tidal wave
and earthquake-generating systems would certainly fall in those
two areas of responsibility of his. It should be noted that
whenever during the conversation we got away from whether or not
the weapons system had actually been implanted, Craven quickly
warmed up to the subject as the ‘can do’ technologist he is
known to be. When he said he could develop such a program—a
‘total weapons system’ he called it—in only (4) years, he did so
with considerable gusto. It was in this vein that Craven offered
the next remark.
Craven said that the individual
missile capsules did not have to be placed in silos on the
seabed, but could be dumped off the rear of a fast-moving
destroyer. Craven said that there would be some problem for the
missile to know its precise location, but that this could be
worked out.”
The Hodges warning document also reports
the assessment of feasibility of underwater missiles by two other
experts. One who is identified as having worked for 16 years on
American submarine-launched ballistic missile projects is Robert C.
Aldrich. He is quoted as saying, quote:
“Quite feasible, though I was
skeptical at first.”
Another person quoted is Costa Tpsis of
MIT Center for International Studies, a well known analyst of
strategic missile systems. His assessment of the feasibility of
undersea missile systems, as described by Hodges, is reported to be
quote:
“’Absolutely possible.’ Tpsis said
that such silos could be placed on the continental shelf in
water as shallow as 100 meters and still achieve the same
protective purpose.”
(End of quote from the Hodges warning
document.)
My friends, Tony Hodges deserves a great
deal of credit, both for the importance of the material he uncovered
and summarized in his warning document, and for the way in which he
has handled it. First, he tried unsuccessfully to get the Government
to take proper corrective measures without having to resort to
embarrassing publicity about it. Then, he turned to the press in the
person of a syndicated columnist, whom I will simply call “Mr. X.”
Mr. X took great interest in the Hodges warning document material
and in the plan to have it delivered to the governments of the
signatories to the Seabed Arms Control Treaty on December 17, 1975.
According to Hodges, a big news story was written ready to break on
the same day the documents were delivered—December 17, 1975. But
suddenly Mr. X decided to kill the story because CIA Director
William Colby, National Security Council Staff Director Brent
Scowcroft, and Richard Chaney of the White House Staff all asked him
to kill it! Nevertheless the warning document was delivered to the
ambassadors of the Seabed Treaty signatories in Washington and at
the United Nations in New York City. According to Mr. Hodges this,
too, apparently fell on deaf ears.
Nor have attempts to bring it to the
attention of the United States Congress apparently been of any use!
But, my friends, Tony Hodges was on to something very big indeed.
Having been alerted for the first time by his warning document that
the United States might be involved in some way with undersea
missiles or other nuclear weapons, I began checking my own
Intelligence sources to find out whether it was actually so or not.
And, my friends, the answer is “Yes.” The Hodges warning document
provides a great deal of very informative background material for
what I am about to tell you; and I am informed that as long as he
has copies of it left, you can obtain a copy for $10.00 by writing
to him directly. The name and address:
Mr. Anthony Hodges, 3238 Paty Drive,
Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 His telephone number now is: Area Code
808-988-2557.
What I have to tell you now, my friends,
is not the responsibility of Tony Hodges in any way. It is what I
have learned from my own Intelligence sources over the past two
months, and I accept full responsibility for making it public. When
I revealed the presence of Soviet short-range nuclear missiles in
our waters last August, I mentioned that the United States had not
placed similar missiles in the waters around the Soviet Union. I can
confirm once again that this is the case. But now, I have learned
that an entirely different kind of underwater-launch offensive
nuclear missiles are targeted on the Soviet Union from resting
places deep in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
According to my own Intelligence information, only 14 of these
undersea supermissiles have been deployed--5 in the Pacific, 9 in
the Atlantic—but that’s enough. Each of these encapsulated
supermissiles is more akin to the Saturn moon rocket than to any
ordinary ICBM. Each carries several dozen independently targetable
hydrogen warheads. Several of these on each missile are superyield
warheads, with the rest being similar to the normal Minuteman or
Polaris warhead. The superyield warheads are designed to devastate
all the major ports and key portions of the industrial heartland of
the Soviet Union, in spite of the Civil Defense measures that the
Soviets have taken in recent years. The huge number of lower-yield
warheads are targeted on relatively soft targets throughout the
Soviet Union with the sole purpose of raising the Soviet casualty
toll as high as possible.
The whole purpose of these undersea
supermissiles is to confront the Soviet Union with a threat of
massive counterattack which cannot be neutralized in a Soviet first
strike, and which would ruin the Soviet Union as a functioning
society. According to plan, these missiles would virtually destroy
the Soviet Union as a modern civilization, killing over 100-million
people in the process. But, my friends, the purpose of these
undersea supermissiles aimed at the Soviet Union is not to protect
you and me, nor to prevent war! They are under the direct control of
the Rockefeller Brothers by way of their controlled CIA—not the
normal chain of command through the Department of Defense; and their
purpose is to serve as an awesome club over the heads of the Soviet
rulers to make sure that NUCLEAR WAR ONE goes as planned.
The world-wide Pearl Harbor attack that was imminent last August
when I publicly revealed the world-wide locations of Soviet
underwater missiles was a daring Soviet gamble. Its purpose was to
eliminate the Four Rockefeller Brothers from the scene and
simultaneously prevent the CIA undersea missiles from being launched
by making such counterattacks seem pointless. But the key ingredient
of that plan was secrecy and total surprise. My intelligence sources
made it abundantly clear last July and August that the only way to
prevent immediate nuclear disaster was public exposure of the truth.
And now we know why. Now we also know why the Four Rockefeller
Brothers felt that they could get away with the seemingly suicidal
policy instituted on Red Friday, October 1, 1976, agreeing to allow
the Soviet Union to keep planting short-range nuclear missiles in
our territorial waters without harassment. It’s all part of a
nuclear standoff involving weapons the public does not even know
about and in which the Rockefellers believe they hold the upper
hand.
There are now strong indications that
the Four Rockefeller Brothers, believing they still hold the upper
hand with their undersea supermissiles, plan to turn the presence of
the Soviet missiles in our waters to their own advantage. During the
fall of 1976 they re-established the strained alliance between
themselves and the Soviet Union for the time being; and now we are
being built up rapidly to accept a Declaration of National
Emergency. The announcement by the Government that there are Soviet
missiles in our waters is now being arranged to be done with the
advanced knowledge of the Soviet Union. Just as Franklin D.
Roosevelt declared an “unlimited national emergency” on May 27, 1941
as part of the build-up for war, a similar scenario is being worked
out now to trap us all!
But the cruel joke may be on the Rockefeller Brothers themselves,
who may yet be buried by the Soviet Union along with
millions of us. Something is going wrong with the CIA supermissiles
deep in the ocean; and as of now, one is completely disabled and
five more are deteriorating rapidly and probably are not usable.
That leaves only eight undersea supermissiles at the disposal of the
Rockefeller Brothers; and their reliability, too, is now open to
serious question. In addition, the Soviet fears about their
corroding underwater missiles in the secret Soviet missile crisis of
1971, which I described in monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 14 last July,
apply again now. Several of the undersea supermissiles are now
leaking plutonium from their disabled warheads into the surrounding
water, and the possibility of an uncontrolled explosion cannot be
ruled out. Should this happen, tidal waves or earthquakes could be
created that could affect Hawaii, the Bahamas, or any place along
the east coast from Nova Scotia to Florida.
Just as my Intelligence sources emphasized last summer that public
exposure of the truth was the key to avoiding disaster, the same
situation exists again now. The CIA undersea supermissiles in the
Atlantic and Pacific cannot protect us from war, and in fact are not
even intended for that purpose. Yet they sit there as a present
hazard to all of our lives, directly and indirectly. Therefore I am
going to reveal the locations of all 14 of the CIA undersea
supermissiles in navigational coordinates. At a minimum I hope to
strip the Rockefeller cartel of their ace in the hole that makes our
survival irrelevant to them; but even more, I hope to undo their
continued cooperation with the Soviet Union in a plan to sacrifice
millions of our lives. This may well be our last chance to prevent
the present “pre-war period” from erupting as planned into NUCLEAR
WAR ONE. The missiles are located in water depths ranging from a few
hundred feet at several Atlantic sites to more than 15,000 feet at
one Pacific site.
The following five locations are in the Pacific Ocean. Incidentally,
these are in the vicinity of locations which are shown on a map in
the Hodges warning document as probable locations of undersea
weapons. As explained in the warning document, Mr. Hodges believes
that these locations were the subject of seabed weapons
installations or tests by the CIA-financed Howard Hughes mystery
ship, the Glomar Explorer.
-
Pacific Missile No. 1--About 25
miles north of the Hawaiian Island Kauai at 22-37-14 North,
159-21-55 West. Plutonium leakage from this missile is badly
contaminating the surrounding water.
-
Pacific Missile No. 2--About 10
miles north of Kauai at 22-21-59 North, 159-36-19 West. Leaking,
but not as badly.
-
Pacific Missile No. 3--About 650
miles northwest of Christmas Island at 9-20-0 North, 165-18-41
West.
-
Pacific Missile No. 4--About 550
miles northwest of Christmas Island at 8-0-0 North, 163-34-38
West. This missile is totally disabled.
-
Pacific Missile No. 5--About 420
miles west-northwest of Christmas Island at 3-2-0 North,
164-35-25 West.
Now for the Atlantic missiles:
-
Atlantic Missile No. 1--In Canadian
waters near Sable Island at 43-52-0 North, 59-10-54 West.
-
Atlantic Missile No. 2--In Canadian
waters about 140 miles south-southeast of Halifax, Nova Scotia,
at 42-30-24 North, 63-1-5 West.
-
Atlantic Missile No. 3--About 225
miles due east of Cape Cod at 41-46-23 North, 65-54-33 West.
-
Atlantic Missile No. 4--About 120
miles southeast of Cape Cod at 40-20-0 North, 68-18-32 West.
Leaking.
-
Atlantic Missile No. 5--About 50
miles to the southwest of Atlantic Missile No. 4 at 40-4-0
North, 69-17-27 West.
-
Atlantic Missile No. 6--Only about
30 miles southeast of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina at 34-49-1
North, 75-17-27 West. Leaking.
-
Atlantic Missile No. 7--About 240
miles east-northeast of Charleston, So. Car. at 33-5-40 North,
75-43-38 West.
-
Atlantic Missile No. 8--About 290
miles east-southeast of Jacksonville, Fla. at 30-9-9 North,
77-8-44 West. Leaking.
And finally:
In 1947 the Rockefeller Brothers
arranged for the CIA to be created for their own private purposes,
and today it is the CIA—not the normal military chain of
command—that exercises control for the Rockefellers over the
undersea supermissiles as part of its expanding encroachment into
military affairs. This is helping to bring our beloved country to
agony and ruin, unless, my friends, WE stop it!
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
|