|
Audio Letter
#23
Hello, my friends, this is Dr. Beter. Today is April 24, 1977, and
this is my monthly Audioletter No. 23.
Two months ago in Audioletter No. 21 for February 1977, I explained
how America had been turned into a nation-wide energy
addict over the course of two generations and more, and how this
energy addiction is to be used against us by the four Rockefeller
brothers in turning off our national security; and just four days
ago, on April 20, 1977, this process got under way in earnest by way
of David Rockefeller’s revolutionary energy program announced to the
world by his employee, Jimmy Carter. To the casual observer it must
seem incredible—a new administration under a new President, with no
previous experience in Washington, has in only three short months
done what no previous administration has ever succeeded in doing:
developed a comprehensive, detailed energy program for the most
complex economy on earth. Furthermore, Mr. Carter tells us that we
must do as he tells us in order to avoid “a national catastrophe”;
and he says we must act now. Why the rush? Why this sudden urgency?
And why does he go out of his way to call his energy program “the
moral equivalent of war”?
The answer lies in what I warned you
about at the end of monthly Audioletter No. 22 just last month. The
CIA is hard at work arranging what is to be the CIA’s crowning
achievement—the staging of a horrendous act of terrorism that is
intended to cause war to erupt in the whole of the Middle East. This
is to set in motion a modified, up-dated version of the detailed war
plan I revealed in monthly Audioletter No. 6 for November 1975. This
plan includes a limited nuclear strike from the Sinai to cap off
Arab OPEC oil wells except those in Libya, which is controlled by
the CIA. This will lead immediately to very harsh energy rationing
in the United States, and the Federal government will at last get to
issue those precious gas rationing coupons that have been awaiting
use now for over three years.
So the Carter energy plan with its
underlying warlike atmosphere is actually the first step in a
gradual shift unto a war footing for the United States. It has the
same purpose as the declaration of national emergency which
President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed in May 1941, six months
before Pearl Harbor, to start getting America ready for war he was
helping to bring about. The second major step in our progressive
shift onto war footing is intended to occur the time of the cut-off
of Middle East oil, by war. This will provide a perfect excuse for
an actual Declaration of National Emergency, and that in turn will
activate all the dictatorial presidential powers spelled out in
Executive Order 11921 signed by President Ford very quietly in June
1976, and described in my Audioletter No. 14 for July 1976.
Audioletter No. 14, of course, is also the issue in which I first
revealed the presence of Soviet underwater missiles and bombs in our
own territorial waters. The terrible Middle East incident now
brewing, which I fervently hope and pray will somehow be sidetracked
by its advanced exposure, is to cause a limited nuclear war in the
Middle East. That in turn is supposed to initiate a chain of events,
culminating in Nuclear War One between the Soviet Union and the
United States of America. Originally this was to have been a
carefully programmed war for the mutual benefit of the Rockefeller
cartel and their Soviet allies, with the Rockefellers and their
intimates riding out the war safely in the nuclear-safe zone across
the northern United States; but ever since the Soviet Union began
its double cross of the Rockefellers last summer 1976, the plans for
war have been undergoing frantic revisions.
Even the insane Rockefeller concessions
to the Soviets, embodied in the Red Friday agreement of October 1,
1976 (which I revealed that month in Audioletter No. 17) have failed
to fully reinstate the Rockefeller/Soviet alliance—so now anything
can happen. The Rockefeller brothers, who for so long have tried to
play God with their immense power, are now finding out that they too
are fallible and human, even if they still refuse to consciously
admit it. Today, my friends, the power of the Rockefeller empire is
in the process of destroying itself; but just as Samson pulled down
the temple around him, the Rockefeller brothers threaten to pull
down modern civilization around their heads as their power runs out
of control and collapses into the inferno of nuclear war.
Earlier this month, on April 7, 1977, Prime Minister Rabin of Israel
resigned. The press has played up his resignation as if
it were another Watergate, but actually it was only a technicality
having to do with a modest bank account held here in Washington,
D.C. by Rabin against government regulations. Overnight Rabin was
out of office, and his public career has been described as ruined;
but the real reason for Rabin’s lightning exit from Israeli politics
was that he learned of the CIA plot to ignite war in the Middle
East, and he wanted no part of it. It’s almost a replay of Sir
Harold Wilson’s sudden unexplained resignation as Prime Minister of
Great Britain on March 16, 1976, just over a year ago; and as I
explained then in monthly Audioletter No. 10, Wilson resigned
because he had learned of the coming war plan and wanted nothing to
do with it. And so the build-up toward war continues, and our rulers
know it. But what of the American public in general? How many know
what danger we are in? And especially, how many believe it enough to
do something about it? My friends, most Americans today are on
vacation from reality, but reality will have to be faced one day in
the not too distant future.
My three special topics for today are:
-
Topic #1-- THE PRE-WAR
SABOTAGE OF AMERICA
-
Topic #2-- THE COMING
NAVAL BATTLE FOR THE UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD
-
Topic #3-- THE UNTOLD
PERSONAL SACRIFICE OF GENERAL GEORGE S. BROWN
Topic #1
--In the early days of the 20th century
the Rockefeller/Standard Oil monopoly had already become supreme in
the United States, but abroad it faced two powerful competitors in
oil. One was the British Empire, whose destruction by means of two
World Wars I’ve discussed in a number of my past talking tapes. The
other foreign competitor was even bigger than the British Empire in
oil, and it was attacked and destroyed first. That competitor was
Czarist Russia. After the Bolshevik Revolution took place in 1917,
property owners and businessmen of all kinds were dispossessed and
liquidated in great numbers. And included in this, by design, was
the utter destruction of the oil fields, refineries, oil tankers,
everything having to do with oil. The small band of revolutionaries
under Lenin and Trotsky who had been sent into Russia with the help
of Rockefeller financing had done their job well; and within a few
years the new Communist regime of the Soviet Union welcomed the
Rockefeller/Standard Oil interests with open arms to re-develop the
huge Russian oil reserves. Ever since that day, right down to the
present, practically all of the oil leaving the Soviet Union has
been carried in oil tankers of the Rockefeller/Standard Oil empire
under various names, nominees, and national flags.
For a thorough and most unusual expose of the oil competition
presented to the Rockefellers by Czarist Russia, I highly
recommend a new book by Robert V. Tolf, entitled THE RUSSIAN
ROCKEFELLERS—THE SAGA OF THE NOBEL FAMILY AND THE RUSSIAN OIL
INDUSTRY published by the Hoover Institution Press, Stanford
University, Stanford, Calif. 94305--the price is $15.95 postpaid.
For decades following the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet rulers
were absolutely dependent upon an uninterrupted flow of transfusions
from the West of money, technical know-how, food, and arms. The
Kremlin ruled a huge nation with an iron fist, and the Rockefellers
shared this rule with the Kremlin. The Soviet Union, therefore,
appeared to be the perfect vehicle for bringing the entire world
under the control of the super-rich Rockefellers and their
intimates. All that was necessary, or so they thought, was to
gradually build up the Soviet system while bleeding to death the
harder to control United States and the western world.
This was the situation the four Rockefeller brothers inherited long
ago-they literally grew up with it, and could hardly imagine
things being any different. But now things are different. The Soviet
Union can now survive without continued outside help, and now they
have been double-crossing the Rockefellers and we the people will
have to suffer for it. Now, both the Rockefellers and the Soviets
are maneuvering, playing a tricky game, and all the while trying to
emerge supreme from the conflict to come. But, just as it was
planned before the Rockefeller/Soviet alliance began coming apart,
the main and prime battleground is to be the United States of
America. The Soviet Union is busy at work trying to weaken America
here and abroad so that we can be defeated in Nuclear War One; and
the Rockefellers are trying to turn our nation into a complete
dictatorship under their domination. Both are trying to bend the
weakening of America’s freedom to their own special advantage.
The centerpiece of the Rockefeller program to completely take over
America right now is the so-called CARTER ENERGY PROGRAM. Recently
the CIA s-u-d-d-e-n-l-y upgraded its estimates of Soviet spending
for new military equipment and installations to four times the
previous figure so as to alarm us. In a similar vein, the CIA has
also provided Jimmy Carter with grist for his energy mill to grind
us into submission by issuing a report saying world oil reserves are
much lower than previously thought. Both CIA reports are rubbish,
issued purely for propaganda purposes; so the CIA under Admiral
Turner, who is a Rockefeller man, is continuing with the
preparations for the limited nuclear strike from the Sinai in order
to get the war started. American F-15 fighter bombers are now
available in the Sinai and would hit all of the five or more Arab
target areas with ease; and the special low-yield nuclear weapons
for the job are already on the scene, currently stored underground
at the so-called American Monitoring Station in the Sinai. The bombs
themselves are atomic, not hydrogen, very clean, with primary blast
effects confined to a radius of only 300 to 400 yards—just right for
a so-called surgical attack to wipe out the oil wells in the target
areas.
As for America, even though the Alaskan
oil is supposed to start flowing through the pipeline this summer,
it will not come into the lower United States. It happens to be high
sulphur oil of a type which west-coast refineries cannot handle even
though there have been ten years to get ready for Alaskan oil.
Instead, the Rockefeller plan is to ship this oil to Japan at a
handsome profit, of course, and make up the difference with more
imports of, guess what—Arab oil. When the Arab oil is cut off, there
will be some attempts to ship some of the otherwise useless Alaskan
oil to the Gulf Coast by small, inefficient tankers through the
Panama Canal, which is targeted both by underwater missiles and by
missiles in Guyana. The sharp drop in our oil supplies will also
help to intensify the reduction in food supplies, which is already
resulting from drought here in America. Many factors are
contributing to the drought situation, including not only the Soviet
weather modification activities I’ve mentioned in the past, but also
activities under Rockefeller control. For example, I mentioned in
Audioletter No. 9 for February 1976 that for years the Rockefeller
oil companies have been knowingly lowering the underground water
table in many areas of the Midwest and Great Plains by means of
excessive pumping from their oil wells; and now, in many of these
very areas, the problem of low ground water is adding to the drought
crisis.
Meanwhile, the Rockefellers never lose sight of their objectives, no
matter how much they are forced to change their
tactics along the way. Their objective for America is DICTATORSHIP,
according to the pattern spelled out in their secret New
Constitution, which I revealed in my Audio Book Talking Tape No. 4
released in July 1975. Under the guise of “governmental
reorganization”, the provisions of their dictatorial new
constitution are being imposed on the United States piecemeal,
gradually, while our real Constitution is increasingly “interpreted”
out of existence.
But of all the things that determine whether a nation will survive
or succumb in time of crisis, the human spirit is still the most
important. A strong spirit and deep resolve can overcome seemingly
insurmountable obstacles, and it can make a people impossible to
conquer; but a weak spirit, without convictions or values, leaves a
people defenseless—defenseless no matter how much armor they may
wear or what weapons they may command. This is why the human spirit
has been the most consistent target of all, both of the Rockefeller
“One World” group and of the rulers of the Soviet Union.
Last month in Audioletter No. 22 I pointed out one of the extremes
in church philosophy that has been promoted wherever possible for
generations by the Rockefellers and their collaborators. This
extreme is to divorce the moral and spiritual lessons of religions
from daily decisions and actions, as if the two had no relationship
to one another except for lip service. For whatever reasons, this
extreme is personified today by one Jimmy Carter. The opposite
extreme is equally deadly, if not more so. This is to dilute the
spiritual teaching for which churches originally existed and replace
it with preaching about economic, political, and social issues. To
do this is to play with fire; but this is exactly what the National
Council of Churches and its sister organization the World Council of
Churches have been doing for decades. Prior to November 28, 1950,
the National Council was known as the Federal Council of Churches.
For many years the Federal Council had been dominated at the
national level by the Rockefellers and their agent John Foster
Dulles, and was the recipient of several grants from the Rockefeller
Foundation.
But the Federal Council became so
totally identified with political activism in support of socialist
causes that it became an object of increasing distrust. Accordingly,
the name was changed to the National Council of Churches, and its
tarnished halo was polished up with public assurances that this was
a new organization which would devote itself to the real business of
the church. There were many influential laymen in the churches under
the umbrella of the National Council who wanted to help insure that
the supposedly new organization would truly devote itself to proper
areas of church concern. As a result, a National Lay Committee was
brought into being under the chairmanship of the late J. Howard
Pugh, a truly great American, who was the director and president of
the Sun Oil Co. when it was still free of the grasping clutches of
the Rockefellers. The National Lay Committee existed from March 28,
1951, until June 30, 1955.
The whole story of what happened to the National Lay Committee of
the National Council of Churches is told in the “Chairman’s Final
Report” by J. Howard Pugh. Unfortunately this important report has
long been suppressed and buried. I have in my possession one of the
very few copies still known to be in existence; therefore I will
read a few brief passages from the Chairman’s Explanatory Letter,
which serves as a Foreword to the Report as a whole. These
quotations are taken in sequence; and although they do not do
justice to Mr. Pugh’s complete explanatory letter, much less the
entire 316-page Report, I believe you will find them revealing:
“In the failure of this most
important effort to bring about an enduring partnership between
the clergy and laity, I feel a very real responsibility to
provide a comprehensive and factual account of those steps which
led to the Board’s action—discontinuing lay participation.”
“We lay people found ourselves not
only deeply in the minority but often poles apart from the
clergy who invariably out-voted us 10 to 1 in these sessions.”
“The members of the Lay Committee were often misunderstood in
their urgency to keep the churches out of politics and their
insistence on the promisee evangelism. Our premise was that
instead of appealing to government, the church should devote its
energies to the work of promoting the attributes of
Christianity—truth, honesty, fairness, generosity, justice, and
charity in the hearts and minds of men. We attempted to
emphasize that Christ stressed not the expanded State, but the
dignity and responsibility of the individual.”
“Their philosophy, it seemed to the Lay Committee, looked to an
ever-expanding government.”
“With few exceptions, the members of the Lay Committee had
agreed to serve only because they had been assured that the new
National Council would avoid the political involvements and
controversies of the old Federal Council of Churches, which was
now superseded.”
“Most of the members of the Lay Committee came finally to the
realization that a wide chasm existed between the thinking of
the laity and the clergy and executives of the denominational
bodies which comprise the National Council.”
“Thus, on June 30, 1955, the Lay Committee ceased to exist as a
committee of the General Board.”
“The members of the Lay Committee believed, and so stated, that
the political adventures of the National Council in the fields
of economic and political controversy would seriously hinder and
not further Christian leadership in the pressing fields of
evangelism, fellowship, and education.”
“It appears from the record that the
National Council could find no room for opposition to the
philosophies and practices carried over from the old Federal
Council. Lacking the patience to resolve the basic problem, it
has sought to bury it.”
Thus ended, my friends, more than 20
years ago the last major effort to deflect the Rockefeller-dominated
National Council of Churches away from its political programs and
toward concern for spiritual matters. After more than four years of
frustrating effort, the National Lay Committee was dissolved. This
signaled the end of any influence of the general church population
of America on the policies of the National Council of Churches. The
National Council proceeded on its way, proclaiming to the public
that it represented 34,000,000 Protestants, while using this power
base to help undermine our free Republic. The National Council has
done much to help dull and weaken the spirit of millions of
Americans, softening our approach in opposition to Communism. Let us
hope and pray that in these dangerous days they will at last see the
light and begin to work at last to build up the American spirit,
instead of destroying it.
Topic #2
--In monthly Audioletter No. 15 for
August 1976, I explained that the planting of short-range
underwater-launch
nuclear missiles in our territorial waters was part of the Soviet
naval strategy for the United States and world conquest. The
same continues to be the case now. Admiral Gorshkoff, who has
commanded the Soviet navy for more than 20 years, has built it into
a fighting force that is radically different from any other navy the
world has ever seen; and as we near the very threshold of war, it is
no accident that the Rockefeller insider who now heads the CIA is
also an Admiral--4-star Admiral Stansfield Turner. The CIA has
become the most powerful military organization in the United States,
and Nuclear War One will revolve around naval strategy. Both the
importance of the Soviet Navy and its great difference from our own
United States Navy can be illustrated by just one fact: When the
supersonic Backfire long-range bomber entered operational service in
the Soviet Union late in 1974, it did so simultaneously with the
Soviet Navy as well as with the Soviet Air Force. This is like
giving our own new supersonic bomber, the B-1, to our Navy to
fly—or, since we still do not have the B-1 to counter the Soviet
Backfire, having our navy fly B-52s. Of course our own navy does not
fly strategic bombers.
The United States Navy, like the British
Navy and most of the other great navies of history, has as one of
its primary missions the protection of our sea lanes of commerce—a
war which is basically defensive in nature. Since World War II our
navy has also acquired offensive missions which have gradually
assumed greater importance, including the ability to attack an enemy
from the sea with the submarine-launched ballistic missiles. But the
traditional defensive mission of protecting our sea lanes can never
be neglected. Admiral Gorshkoff, however, has been able to
concentrate on building a navy which is almost totally offensive in
character. Soviet fishing trawlers, some of them genuine, roam the
world; but the Soviet Union does not depend for its survival on the
sea nearly as much as the United States. So the Soviet Navy is
designed first and foremost for offensive operations; and this not
only includes the ability to interdict enemy sea lanes and attack
enemy naval forces at sea, it also includes an unprecedented
emphasis on projecting naval power ashore. This in turn means not
only the ability to carry out amphibious assaults and tactical
bombardment, but strategic attack—a role we usually tend to think of
only in terms of the Soviet Air Force with its ICBMs and bombers.
The new Soviet Navy of Admiral Gorshkoff also differs from ours in
another way. Aside from missile submarines, the American Navy is
structured around the aircraft carrier; whereas the Soviet Navy is
built around the submarine. American task forces include all kinds
of ships designed to coordinate with the needs and capabilities of
the aircraft carrier. By the same token, Soviet surface ships of all
kinds are intended to support the huge submarine force in various
ways. This applies even to the new Soviet aircraft carriers which
are now beginning to appear on the scene since Soviet naval aviation
is heavily oriented toward anti-submarine warfare, although it has
other capabilities as well. The relative naval capabilities of the
Soviet Union and the United States have never been considered in the
Strategic Arms Limitations Talks, the SALT talks, except with regard
to sea-launch ballistic missiles; and yet it is the coming naval
confrontation that could all by itself determine the outcome of
Nuclear War One.
It is often forgotten, for example, that
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is primarily a naval
alliance. We hear frequently about NATO in the controlled major
media of the United States as though the only problems were Army
problems—such as rusty tanks and lack of spare parts; and when the
Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, who is presently General Alexander
Haig, is mentioned in the news, he is often called the head of NATO,
or some such, but actually he’s only one of three co-equal
Commanders in NATO. The other two are Naval Commanders—they are the
Commander-in-Chief, Channel Command; andthe Supreme Allied
Commander, Atlantic, the latter based at Norfolk, Va. NATO depends
for its very life on its navalstrength, including the ability to
keep open the vital North Atlantic sea lanes.
But now, Soviet naval Backfire bombers
with air-to-surface, anti-ship missiles threaten to cut those North
Atlantic sea lanes in time of war; and the Mediterranean, which was
once dominated by the United States Navy, is now heavily populated
by the Soviet Navy as well. While the Soviet Navy has undergone
explosive growth over the past decade to the formidable armed force
that it is today, the United States Navy has been allowed to shrink
to half its former size with more and more ships aging and
obsolescent. When the Arab oil is cut off by war soon, Europe will
have to fall back on its meager reserves, which will run out within
60 to 90 days. Interdiction of NATO sea lanes at that point by the
Soviet Union could cause all of Europe to fall like a plum into
Soviet hands.
This is especially true in light of the
short-range Soviet underwater missiles in European territorial
waters, which I mentioned in Audioletter No. 22 last month. So far
only Great Britain shows signs of being able to withstand such a
course of events. As I mentioned last month, the British government
had requested the latest missile coordinates from me, and I had
supplied them. Of the 29 Soviet missiles around the British Isles at
that time, all but one had been removed by the Royal Navy as of
April 18--6 days ago. However, I have been informed of 3 newly
planted missiles there, and I have relayed these to the British for
action. Great Britain also may have the benefit of her new North Sea
oil fields which, barring sabotage or the like, should make Britain
independent of foreign oil producers in the near future. Since I
spoke to you last, action has been taken in another area also.
Acting on information which I relayed, of the 8 missiles around
southern Africa, seven have now been taken up.
At last report, however, the missile lying off Mozambique targeted
on Rhodesia was still in place. Such removals of missiles are better
than no action at all, but they are still no more than holding
actions. What is needed, if war is to be prevented, is for this
deadly cat-and-mouse game to be stopped altogether by revealing to
the whole world what the Soviet Navy is up to. Late last September,
as I revealed in monthly Audioletter No. 16, the United States had a
golden opportunity to do just that, and to do so while the Soviet
underwater missile threat was only a small fraction of what it is
now. At that time, a Soviet missile-laying mini-sub equipped with
sonar-defeating design features entered Chesapeake Bay and became
trapped there, due to a malfunction that ultimately killed the crew.
It was a perfect opportunity for the United States to pick up the
sub, display it on television world-wide by satellite, and tell the
Soviet Union that the jig was up; but instead, as I revealed in
Audioletter No. 17 the following month, the Red Friday agreement on
October 1, 1976 reinstated a strained alliance between the
Rockefellers and the Soviets, and the Soviet Navy was allowed to
enter Chesapeake Bay under cover of darkness and recover the
mini-sub. But now, a similar opportunity exists once again—not in
American waters but in those of Norway. In
March 1977 a Soviet submarine entered the fjord of Folda on the
north coast of Norway.
The Norwegians detected its presence and
sealed off the exit to wait for the sub to surface. On April 4,
1977, the story was broken in European press, although the location
was not mentioned. To my knowledge, however, it has received no
mention anywhere in the United States. I strongly suggest to the
Norwegian government that before the Soviet submarine be allowed to
escape, a search be made at the navigational coordinates 64 35’ 23”
north, 10 23’ 14” east. This location is not far from where the
Soviet submarine is trapped and is the site of one of the seven
Soviet underwater missiles that have been planted recently in
Norwegian waters. Should the government of Norway so request, I will
naturally provide the other locations as well, through proper
channels. As for the United States, there continues to be no effort
at all to clear our waters of the Soviet nuclear weapons which
threaten our country. As of my latest report a few days ago, not one
of the 158 Soviet missiles and hydrogen bombs lurking in our
territorial waters has been removed, and I have not been approached
in any way by the United States government with requests for their
locations. Meanwhile the Soviet plutonium cloud attacks on the
United States are still continuing by means of the new canisters
which are being deployed close to shore along the West Coast, which
I mentioned last month.
Of the 16 canisters which were deployed
at the time I recorded Audioletter No. 22 last month, 11 had been
discharged as of April 15, but by then there were 17 new ones. At
last report, these canisters are being deployed along the entire
West Coast from San Diego to Seattle. These are extremely easy and
simple to deploy—for example, they are dropped from aircraft flying
under our radar like the Soviet Bear bombers that we were told about
by news reports the other day. They are also planted by Soviet
trawlers, since they are allowed to enter our new 200-mile fishing
zone to catch certain fish there. The fact that this is being done
was proven by the arrested Soviet trawler Taras Shevchenko which was
carrying plutonium canisters in a compartment near the stern of the
ship.
Thus the maneuvering in preparation for Nuclear War One continues
with a strong naval emphasis. At one level, Rockefeller agents in
America appear to continue to cooperate in the joint plan of
conquest with the Soviets; but on the real level the Soviets and the
Rockefellers are both jockeying for a decisive knock-out blow. In
this, time is on the side of the Soviet Union, so they’re trying to
delay war slightly while the Rockefeller brothers are trying to
hurry it up; and to condition us all for it, the Carter
Administration is flexing its muscles to show us how strong it is
when it comes to the Soviets. In short order it has forcefully
espoused Human Rights, handed the Soviets an ultimatum on SALT
talks, seized Soviet fishing trawlers, chased Soviet Bear long-range
turbo-prop bombers away from the southeast coast of our country—and
what’s next? A photo of a Soviet submarine in our waters? Already
the Rockefeller position has decayed further in the past several
months because of the further deterioration of their CIA undersea
super-missiles in the Atlantic and Pacific. Of the fleet of 14 such
missiles which I described in Audioletter No. 20, January 1977, all
5 in the Pacific have now sprung leaks and are no longer usable. Of
the 9 in the Atlantic, 4 have now failed—missiles #4, 6, 7, and 8.
That leaves only 5 of the original fleet of 14 CIA missiles still
available for Rockefeller threats against their Soviet partners.
Meanwhile the Soviet short-range missiles in our waters in the
Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico are now being
used by the Soviets to further weaken our position as a nation.
But, my friends, that’s not all. For the very first time Soviet
missiles have now been planted in the Great Lakes. From there they
now threaten Chicago, Racine, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Bay City, Erie,
Buffalo, Rochester, and other cities of our industrial heartland. At
present there are exactly 50 such missiles in the Great Lakes.
These, however, are single warhead, short-range missiles, and are
even smaller in size than the multiple warhead missiles that have
been planted along our East, West, and Gulf Coasts. As if this were
not enough, I have just been alerted that Soviet agents are now
fanning out across America planting small hydrogen bombs in selected
inland lakes.
The primary targets here are major dams, but some other targets are
also involved. Since the Federal government refuses to take action,
it’s imperative that State governments—especially those in the
West—take action now to protect their citizens. Security patrols
around major dams and lakes should be beefed up immediately and
placed on full alert. In addition, search operations must be
performed to locate those bombs that have already been planted so
that they can be removed. Already, Soviet underwater nuclear devices
have been planted in 21 places within the United States, and more
are being planted. Nineteen (19) of the targets are dams, the other
2 are cities.
-
CALIFORNIA has 4--Oroville Dam north
of Sacramento, Castaic Dam north of Los Angeles, Shasta Dam in
north California, and Otay Reservoir Dam near San Diego.
-
ARIZONA also has 4 bombs—Glen Canyon
Dam, Coolidge Dam, Theodore Roosevelt Dam, and Lake Pleasant Dam
near Phoenix.
-
NEW MEXICO has 3--the Navajo Dam,
Blue Mesa Dam, and Alfa Butte Dam. MONTANA has 3--Fort Peck Dam,
Yellow Tail Dam, and Hungry Horse Dam.
-
NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA,
NEBRASKA, NEVADA, and WASHINGTON STATE so far have 1 bomb each,
threatening dams which are among the world’s largest—these are
respectively Garrison Dam, Oahe Dam, Fort Randall Dam, Hoover
Dam, and Grand Coulee Dam.
-
IDAHO has 2 bombs, both threatening
towns—one is in the north end of Cour d’Alene Lake, threatening
the town of that name; the other is in the north end of Lake
Pend Oreille near the town of Sandpoint. My friends, this would
not have been possible had it not been for the destruction of
the FBI beginning with the murder of J. Edgar Hoover. God help
us all.
Topic #3
--With our military situation so
serious, one would naturally expect someone to come forward to take
action against the Soviet underwater missiles. For example, General
George S. Brown, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, brought
about the removal of many of these ocean and gulf missiles during
August and September 1976. But where is he now?!! My friends, here
is what has happened to General Brown. No matter how much the
tactics of public manipulation change and shift, some things never
change. I mentioned several months ago in connection with the
disgraceful Sputnik One episode that nowadays accolades and awards
go to the spoilers and traitors in our midst, while the true heroes
who dare to raise their heads are beaten down, suppressed, and
forgotten. Today there is no more grim testimony to this fact than
the current predicament of General George S. Brown.
As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Brown is the top
military officer in the United States, and therefore in
some respects in the entire free world. As I revealed in detail in
monthly Audioletter No. 16 for September 1976, it was he,
General Brown, who more than any other person in the United States
government, prevented a surprise Soviet nuclear attack on America
during August and September 1976. Under extremely adverse
conditions, he obtained the go-ahead to remove Soviet underwater
missiles and hydrogen bombs then planted in our own territorial
waters and then ordered the United States Navy to do the job, which
it did quickly.
And on September 16, 1976, I met for
over an hour with General Brown in his office at the Pentagon to
discuss the continuing Soviet underwater missile crisis and to relay
new information to him which had been prevented from reaching him
through normal channels. In meeting with me, General Brown was
accepting terrible personal risks, and he knew it. He had overruled
his entire staff in order to meet with me, and the meeting itself
was completely free of interruptions of any kind. Nor was there any
cut-off due to time; the meeting simply continued without pressure
until we finished the business at hand. Then I left, along with an
associate who had accompanied me to the meeting as a witness. We
drove away from the Pentagon that day in a driving rainstorm; but
the brave patriot whose office we had just left now faced a far
worse personal storm—thanks to his efforts on our nation’s behalf. I
warned my listeners about this in monthly Audioletter No. 16 last
September, and asked that everyone strengthen his hand by expressing
their support for him.
General Brown, alone among the top echelons of the United States
government, had stood by us and had saved millions of our lives in
the process. Now he was depending on us to stand by him in his
continuing efforts to carry out his Constitutional duties to the
letter. Some of us did so, my friends, but far too many of us did
not. During August and early September 1976, the Joint Chiefs of
Staff were flooded with demands for action against the Soviet
underwater missiles; but after that action was taken, there was no
such massive outpouring of thanks for General Brown’s crucial
leadership or support for the continued positive efforts needed to
save our country. Far too many of us forget that it is not enough
just to complain about what is wrong; we must also actively support
that which is right, or it will wither and die. After the crucial
actions taken under General Brown’s leadership late last summer, far
too many of us just relaxed and went back to sleep, leaving General
Brown to fend for himself.
Now I must tell you what has happened to
General Brown as a result. For many months now I have been cut off
from direct contact with General Brown; and in recent months General
Brown has seemed like a completely different person than in the past
whenever he appears in public. In place of the outgoing personality
which has been General Brown’s trademark in the past, there is
nothing but resignation and acceptance of the dictates of his
civilian superiors. The change has been so dramatic that it has even
been commented upon by syndicated columnists, who are mystified.
What has happened to General Brown, my friends, is known to very
few. I myself have been able to confirm it only within the past few
days. General George S. Brown, the nation’s top military officer, is
now virtually under house arrest. This is exactly the same kind of
confinement that was meted out, for example, to Army Lieutenant
William Calley during his court martial for the My Lai massacre in
Vietnam. But there are two differences in General Brown’s case.
First, there has been no court martial.
Instead, he is living under the threat
of a court martial, for its twisted evidence and perjuring witnesses
have already been assembled. Second, General Brown’s isolation at
the Pentagon and confinement to his Fort Myer residence are not
absolute. Instead, they are interspersed with very carefully
controlled appearances at official functions, since his absence from
these would quickly arouse suspicions that something was terribly
wrong. Now, should General Brown attempt again to step out of line
and defy those in high places by giving orders to remove the
missiles, doing his Constitutional duty, the suspended threat of
court martial would instantly come crashing down upon him. By means
of the elaborately doctored and falsified evidence I’ve already
mentioned, General Brown would be railroaded into certain conviction
for treason for doing his duty. Already alleged statements by
General Brown have been published recently to make him appear to be
a dangerous man. Were General Brown to be courtmartialed with
falsified evidence, it would destroy him personally. It would also
prevent his efforts from producing any benefits to America—such as a
resumption of the removal of Soviet nuclear missiles from our
waters. Any such orders of his would be rescinded; and his
courtmartial would be used to make any attempts by him to warn
America useless, by destroying his credibility.
As long ago as October, 1976, just a month after my meeting with
him, General Brown was given a powerful demonstration of the ability
of his enemies to crucify him publicly. As I discussed that month in
Audioletter No. 17, a six-month old interview of General Brown was
dredged up and used to subject him to intense public embarrassment
and criticism. A few alleged statements of his from the interview
were made public and played up by the controlled major media to such
an extent that he was forced to make a public apology on nationwide
television.
Can you imagine? All of that for a few
relatively insignificant comments which, if he really made them at
all, had attracted no attention six months earlier. This episode had
just one purpose—to prove to General Brown that if the falsified
charges of treason should ever be leveled at him, he would have no
chance at all either to defend himself or to do a service to
America. His only recourse now would be to himself publicly demand a
court-martial, but even that would not be successful without a
massive outpouring of public support for him ahead of time—and that,
my friends, has so far been denied him to the everlasting shame of
our entire nation. Should General Brown come to any physical harm,
the responsibility for it will rest squarely on the shoulders of
David, Nelson, Laurance, and John D. Rockefeller III; but meanwhile,
he’s a secret captive, keeping millions of Americans reassured that
all is well merely by his presence on the scene. Whenever a public
or official appearance or statement by General Brown is called for,
it’s arranged and carried out under the watchful eyes of a heavy
escort, although this is not always apparent.
Otherwise the openness, the
accessibility, and warmth that has always distinguished General
Brown among newspaper reporters is now gone. He’s a virtual prisoner
at the Pentagon, held practically incommunicado except for the
carefully controlled communications and appearances I have already
mentioned. As soon as this Audioletter is released, you can expect
to see things happen that may seem to disprove what I am telling
you—for example, General Brown may become more visible publicly for
a while. It is even conceivable, though highly unlikely, that this
might even be carried to the point of having General Brown publicly
deny that he has come under any new restrictions in recent months as
the result, say, of the unfavorable publicity he received some
months ago. Should that happen, keep in mind that General Brown is
now a prisoner of war, imprisoned by the enemies within our own
midst; and we’ve already seen many examples of the kinds of things
American prisoners of war are forced to say for propaganda purposes.
Yes, my friends, General Brown stood up for all of us only to have
too many of us let him down by failing to follow through with our
thanks and our overwhelming support; but there is one way that we
can still keep General Brown’s great personal sacrifice on our
behalf from being in vain, and that is for us, each and every one of
us as individuals, to begin right now to do whatever we can to save
our beloved country. My friends, there’s no vacation from reality.
It’s up to you to do what you can—there’s no one else; and even
though you may not be able to do more than write a letter or two, do
it. You never know how far your few words may spread. They may pass
from one person to another, finally reaching the ear of someone you
don’t even know, someone with far more resources than you have who
may play a vital role in saving our nation, yet who may never hear
and never act if you fail to do your part. If all you have to offer
is 5 loaves and 2 fishes, offer it; you just might be amazed at the
results.
Until next month, God willing, this is Dr. Beter. Thank you, and may
God bless each and every one of you.
|