What can we extract out of the morass of
conflicting perspectives on the Pentagon Crash? What seems to be true is that actual commercial jets hit the twin
towers exactly as described. This was an "easy hit" for an airliner.
It was on film, and we simply cannot refute that in my opinion. It
happened, and everyone saw it.
The result of this fact - that large commercial jets were SEEN to
hit the World Trade Center, over and over again on TV - was that it
was easy for the public to then assume that the same type of craft
hit the Pentagon.
The object that hitthe Pentagon, however, WAS different and I will
try to outline why I think so.
I once spoke at length with an individual who served in the Persian
Gulf conflict. His job was to "program" missiles - VERY smart ones.
Even though it was his job, he was completely astonished at their
capabilities. He said:
"They can be programmed to go down the street
just above the ground, turn right or left at a cross street, and hit
the designated building at the exact floor, even the exact window,
that you tell them to hit!"
Now, thatís amazing.
But we donít think that it was a missile that hit the Pentagon. What
is amazing is the guidance system. Could it be used in a plane? Even
Itís pretty clear, from assembling the information, that it WAS some
sort of plane that was used to strike the Pentagon, and here we come
to most interesting facts.
The very first descriptions - before the mind control machine had
time to go into action - described something "like a missile" or a
craft much smaller than a 757. One of our researchers looked into
this problem and wrote:
Some witnesses said they saw a commuter plane, and others like Army
Captain Lincoln Liebner, said he saw a
passenger jet. Now such confusion at any accident scene is
understandable. What is more, with the craft going 460 mph, added to
the shock of it all, it was probably hard to tell what they really
One of the things that didnít make sense to me were the many reports
that the object hit the ground, when we know from the photos, it
didnít. Something that was supposed to be as big as a 757 was flying
low enough to clip light poles and didnít scrape the ground?
Something is wrong with that picture.
Some even claimed they saw people on the plane - faces in windows.
The many confused descriptions - confused even while declaring it to
be a commercial jet - leads me to believe that whatever this craft
was, it was able to allow people to see what they wanted to... to
give impressions. As long as they could see it with their eyes, it
registered as being a passenger plane of some sort. And, even though
the propaganda machine tells us that it was supposed to be a huge
plane, it was obvious from the descriptive terms used by the
witnesses that this was not the case - even if the "impression" was.
What I did notice was those who didnít SEE the plane, had a most
peculiar "impression" related to the sound.
"At that moment I heard
a very loud, quick whooshing sound
that began behind me and stopped suddenly in front of me and to my
left. In fractions of a second I heard the impact and an explosion.
The next thing I saw was the fireball."
was right underneath the plane," said Kirk Milburn, a
construction supervisor for Atlantis Co., who was on the Arlington
National Cemetery exit of Interstate 395 when he said he saw the
plane heading for the Pentagon.
"I heard a plane. I saw it. I saw debris flying."
Here he said he saw the plane heading for the Pentagon. And because
he saw it he also said "I heard a plane. I saw it. I saw debris
What he said next, however, not in keeping with a 757: "I guess it
was hitting light poles," said Milburn. "It was like a WHOOOSH
whoosh, then there was fire and smoke, then I heard a second
Notice that the witness says: "I guess it was hitting the light
poles." One suspects that he couldnít see it if he was guessing.
What is most interesting is that he said: "It was like a WHOOOSH
whoosh, then there was fire and smoke, then I heard a second
Two witnesses have described a sound of a
"whoosh!" The second one,
when he couldnít see it, said it was like a "WHOOSH whoosh", just
like the other man who couldnít see it. But then he has also told us
that he saw a plane and heard a plane. But what he described was
most definitely NOT a 757 flying low over his head.
A 757, under NO circumstances makes a sound of "whoosh!" And if the
"whoosh" sound was being made by the hitting of light poles, it is a
certainty that if a 757 was doing it, you would not hear the
"whoosh" of hitting light poles over the roar of the jet engines. If
thereís a 757 right overhead thatís hitting light poles, and itís
going 460 mph, I doubt it would be "whooshing"!
If a 757 was low enough to hit light poles, it should have blown the
witnessesí eardrums out along with everything else in the engineís
way. The exhaust of those huge engines is like a supersonic cannon!
The vortex and power of the exhaust would have produced an
experience that is unmistakable - impressive beyond words - and hard
You might want to
take a look at the engine of this plane...
thereís 2 of them and they hang lower than the plane itself. Go
HERE to learn about the jet engine
specs, exhaust velocity contours, and so forth.
Nevertheless, the most they can say is that it went "whoosh." Other
witnesses described a "whistling" that it "whined" like a missile.
According to the news reports, the action of the plane that hit the
Pentagon was quite in keeping with the above described "smart
missile guidance system."
shows Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost a
complete circle and dropping the last 7,000 feet in two-and-a-half
minutes. The steep turn was so smooth, the sources say, itís clear
there was no fight for control going on. And the complex maneuver
suggests the hijackers had better flying skills than many
investigators first believed."
Well, if that doesnít sent up red flags, I donít know what will.
Now have a look at he "Universal
Pilot Replacement Program" and take note of just what
this can do! It even shows diagrams of maneuvers of exactly the kind
we are talking about!
"The jetliner disappeared from radar at 9:37 and less than a minute
later it clipped the tops of street lights and plowed into the
Pentagon at 460 mph."
"Some eyewitnesses believe the plane actually hit the ground at the
base of the Pentagon first, and then skidded into the building.
Investigators say thatís a possibility, which if true, crash experts
say may well have saved some lives."
Again, itís interesting to see what different "impressions" people
had. Now, hereís
some pictures taken inside the Pentagon and of
the workers. Can anyone explain why some of these men
have on protective cover and breathing masks? I donít remember the
firemen at the WTC wearing them...and if they did, there was a lot
of dust, ash and asbestos. I donít see the same thing at the
The authorities explained that the aircraft was pulverized when it
impacted a highly reinforced building. We were next told that the
aircraft melted (with the exception of one landing light - how
convenient - and its black boxes). In short, we are being told that
100 tons of metal melted because a fire exceeded 2500 įC, leading to
the literal evaporation of the aircraft.
Well, if thatís the official story, then why is it that metal
reinforcing inside the Pentagon didnít melt? You can see from the
pictures of the inside, thereís all kinds of metal hanging from the
ceiling and on the floor. And why are they claiming the obvious
limited damage to the Pentagon was a result of the plane hitting the
ground and being slowed down? It just doesnít add up. [LAM]
Sounds like they are talking out of both sides of their mouths at
once. But letís look at still another report:
Steve Patterson, 43, said he was watching television reports of the
World Trade Center being hit when he saw a silver commuter jet fly
past the window of his 14th-floor apartment in Pentagon City. The
plane was about 150 yards away, approaching from the west about 20
feet off the ground, Patterson said. He said the plane, which
sounded like the high-pitched squeal of a fighter jet, flew over
Arlington cemetery so low that he thought it was going to land on
He said it was flying so fast that he couldnít read any writing on
the side. The plane, which appeared to hold about eight to 12
people, headed straight for the Pentagon but was flying as if coming
in for a landing on a nonexistent runway, Patterson said. "At first
I thought íOh my God, thereís a plane truly misrouted from
National,í" Patterson said. "Then this thing just became part of
Pentagon ... I was watching the World Trade Center go and then this.
It was like Oh my God, whatís next?"
He said the plane, which approached the Pentagonbelow treetop
level, seemed to be flying normally for a plane coming in for a
landing other than going very fast for being so low. Then, he said,
he saw the Pentagon "envelope" the plane and bright orange flames
shoot out the back of the building. "It looked like a normal
landing, as if someone knew exactly what they were doing," said
Patterson, a graphics artist who works at home. "This looked
In the above report, we not only have a witness who says the plane
looked like a "silver commuter jet," he also said that the plane
SOUNDED like the "high-pitched squeal" of a fighter jet.
The important thing is, if you have ever seen a 757 up close, the
main words you will use - even if it passes you at 460 mph - are
HUMONGOUS, or HUGE, or GIGANTIC - words along that line. You will
also - even at a distance - be overwhelmed by the noise of the jet
engines. But over and over again, even those who later NAMED the
object that hit the pentagon as a "commercial airliner," used
descriptive terms that are quite different from those that would
have been used if a real 757 had been the impacting object. And
these descriptive terms are more in keeping with descriptions of a
missile or a much smaller plane.
When I was a teenager, we used to go to the airport and park on the
side of the road at the end of the runway so the landing jets would
pass over our heads. It was a rush. Well, even when I go to the
airport nowadays, I like to go to the roof and watch the jets land.
They are over 300 yards away, but it is STILL a rush and - and even
at that distance, a 757 is still awesome. And deafeningly loud.
What we find here is that, among the many descriptions of the
eyewitnesses, the early ones said "small jet," "like a missile." The
later witnesses - AFTER the awareness of the strike against the
World Trade Center was broadcast with film of a commercial jet liner
striking the building being shown over and over again - said that it
was ALSO a commercial airliner exactly like the ones that hit the
World Trade Center that hit the Pentagon.
And we now see why the timing was set up the way it was and why the
film was shown over and over again. It was done to convince the
public that the exact same "strike" was made against the Pentagon so
as to produce maximum emotional impact and to provide an alibi for
those who were in the building, the military organizations
Most people are familiar enough with how witnesses can and do change
their testimony when influenced by statements made by others. Thatís
why juries are sequestered from the press. Thatís why witnesses are
called into the court one at a time and are not allowed to listen to
each otherís testimony. Standard procedure. Add to that the
technology described by Dolan, where words and probably images can
be broadcast directly into a personís mind by microwave, and we have
an easy explanation for why witnesses later said "it was a
An experiment was recently shown on TV in which people were shown
photos of themselves as children to see how much they could remember
of a "fake" event. One of the photos had been put together on
computer to show the subject riding in the basket of a hot air
balloon, something which none of them had ever done.
At first none of the subjects had any response to the composite
picture other than their surprise that they did not remember such an
exciting event. After a few days, the experiment was repeated. This
time when they saw the false photo, a number of the subjects started
to recall completely false memories about the fictional balloon
ride. Remembering points about time, place, who was there, details
about textures and colors etc.
The brain had somehow puts together a false picture to make up for
the apparent loss of a memory that the individual thinks they should
The same would be even more true in the aftermath of such an
emotional event as a "terrorist" attack.
The only problem was that the witnesses to the Pentagon event used
descriptive terms that were simply not applicable to the impression
that a 757 would produce in such circumstances. I have yet to see
one description that says "Oh my god!! It was HUGE! It was right
THERE! Humongous! There was a deafening ROAR!" etc. THAT strikes me
as very strange. A 757 produces those effects every time.
What seems to be so is that the truth IS in their subconscious
minds, and even though they may be under the IMPRESSION that the
object was a 757, the NAME they have given it and the descriptions
of the actual experience do not match up.
Nevertheless, we are certain that it was a plane - it had wings - it
knocked over poles on the incoming maneuver that was "like a
missile." And we know that there is a "guidance system" that has the
capability of doing exactly what this object was described to have
The only problem with this part of the story is the following
comments from a resident of the DC area:
I live in the DC area, and the street lights are not very tall. In
fact DC is a very "treed" city. Many of the trees are taller than
the lamp posts. [...] If the wings of a 757 were hitting the lamp
posts, the engines would be driven into the ground, provided that
the plane was in a straight and level position.
As it happens, a correspondent had an interesting encounter on a
train. In his own words:
I met a gentleman that was of Jamaican descent who said he was an
artist by trade. He was heading back home to Washington. I have no
reason to doubt the manís story as he seemed very sincere and told
it "as a matter of fact".
He said that when he heard on the radio of his car about the
event that the tension around the capital was rising, he was on his
cell phone talking to other people while he drove. He was in viewing
distance of the Pentagon at the time of the attack and he
planes in the air, one of them being a "small commuter type jet" but
he didnít id the other plane. He said it was this smaller plane that
hitthe Pentagon, so it could have been laced with explosives and
remote controlled in by that other plane (reports were of a C-130 in
the area as I recall).
Or it could have been "launched" by another plane.
This brings us back to the many problems of the Pentagon strike that
indicate that it was not a 757, and why would the "experts" continue
to insist that it was? After all, even if it WAS a conspiracy, and
somebody went to the trouble to arrange for a couple big jets to hit
the World Trade Center, why not just use the same procedure and type
of craft to strike the Pentagon?
Letís assume that it WAS a smaller plane that hit the Pentagon. Why?
And we come back to the idea that it is extremely likely that a
plane that had onboard smart missile guidance system (multimedia) that can
literally turn corners and hit the target with such precision that
it is amazing was used.
And we consider this carefully and the only answer that presents
itself as obvious is that of the necessity for precision.
And that leads us directly to the question of why such precision
might be necessary?
The question can only be answered logically by assuming precision
was the major concern in the strike on the Pentagon. And theorizing that precision was a major concern - precision of the
type that can hit an exact window on a designated floor and do an
exact and designated amount of damage - we realize that LIMITING the
damage to a specific and pre-designated area was the major concern.
And if that was the major concern, then we arrive at the idea that
such precision and limitation was essential for some reason.
And the only reason that we can come to is that they wanted to hit
the Pentagon for the emotional impact. Which leads to the idea that
the emotional response of the public to the "poor people in the
Pentagon" was desirable. But since this emotional impact was
achieved with such precision and control suggests to us that it was
also an ALIBI. In short, the safety of CERTAIN occupants of the
building was a concern. Which leads to the idea that those certain
occupants of the building...
We notice that
Newsweek coyly mentions that "On
Sept. 10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials
suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently
because of security concerns."
Did you have a look at the list of casualties in the Pentagon
itself? Where were all the bigwigs in the building???? What about
those guys who canceled their travel plans and who were very likely
IN THE BUILDING at the time? If what we have theorized is true, itís
not likely that they canceled their travel plans because they might
get on the wrong jet. I would be very interested to know who those
IF we are
dealing with a conspiracy - as has
been suggested by many people - designed to generate the emotional
response from the masses of Americans so as to facilitate the
imposition of a One World Government - which is what IS happening,
by the way - then it is very likely that a number of the
conspirators were IN THE PENTAGON AT THE TIME IT WAS HIT.
And yes, in the worlds of intelligence and conspiracy, that kind of
logic prevails. Please read
Dolan for a broader understanding
of the military role in the establishment of the
Secret State so
that you can be assured that hitting the Pentagon would very likely
be seen as essential to divert attention AWAY from individuals
within our own military organizations as possible conspirators. Once
you have a good handle on the disinformation and
COINTELPROmachines, you will understand why a strike against
the Pentagon was
important not only for the ALIBI, but for the EMOTIONAL IMPACT on
the public. After all, if the buildings that represent not only our
status in the world, but also our ability to maintain that status -
i.e. our military organization - are hit by terrorists, then the
emotional reaction of the people will naturally be that we not only
have a right to strike back with all our power, but also that we
MUST. They will also not look at the possibility of a "home
conspiracy" because - after all - the Pentagon WAS a target, right?!
We suggest that the strike on the Pentagon was designed for maximum
emotional impact. And it is obvious that, for this purpose, one
would not want to use a 757 because it is not amenable to the
precision required for the safety of the conspirators in the
building. What was needed was something that could strike the
Pentagon with extreme precision both in terms of WHERE it hit, and
The reader may wish to go a bit further with the ideas presented and
have a look at
The Propaganda Preparation for 9/11
- Even though the author of this analysis obviously hasnít read
Dolan, and dismisses the hyperdimensionalaspects of the conspiracy,
he certainly outlines the major elements of the human operation.
[...] The events of September 11 were planned by those who not only
had the motive, means, and opportunity to carry out the plan, but
also were best placed to manage the consequences stemming from it,
as well as managing the flow of information. [...] The events of
September 11 were masterminded by those who were in the best
position to manage the consequences. [...]
Conspiracies, involve rational, albeit cold-blooded, attempts to
achieve a desired end by employing the most effective means
available. [...] Motive, means, and opportunity. [...]
It appears that the events of September 11 were planned years in
advance, with the groundwork being carefully laid by a propaganda
campaign orchestrated to convince the public that the United States
has a plausibly sophisticated nemesis with the motive, means, and
opportunity to perpetrate a devastating act of terror against
In all cases, the actions of proxy agents and operative planners are
sufficiently distanced and compartmentalized from the true
masterminds to create a condition of "plausible deniability". In
short, the proxies have also been set up as possible patsies with
evidence that has been carefully laid to incriminate them should
cracks in the "official story" become too discernible. [...]
The real guilt must inevitably lie with those in the best position
to manage the flow of information as well as reliably benefit from
the New Order created, primarily, the political and corporate elites
of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union -
also, as it happens, the very parties orchestrating the global war
If this notion of reality strikes you as somewhat dissonant, at odds
with your own personal experience, it may be perhaps that [...] you
have not read the mountain of evidence detailing political and elite
deviant behavior in this country. ...
Regarding the motive, the above author simply says:
"Where the rank and file members of
the CFR are largely motivated by
a self-interested careerism, these higher elites see it as their
moral duty to guide the "ship of state", as it were. To them, a
unified world government is the most logical way to manage the
affairs of the world. After all, these
global elites have more in
common with one another than they do with the bulk of their
The above author has obviously not read the mountain of evidence
detailing the multi-millenial evidence of this conspiracy. At the
ultimate level, humans are NOT the masterminds, we can assure you.
And it is absurd to assign the motive to a perception of a "moral
duty," or even a "logical approach to managing world affairs." That
is nonsense in the face of the FACTS.
No indeed, there is an altogether DIFFERENT AGENDA being manifested
In our article
Something Wicked This Way Comes, we
suggest that there IS a schedule that is driving
the Global Elite,
with their puppet George Bush in the driverís seat. Our
Adventures Series goes into many of
the details that we uncovered by tracking the clues which suggest
what the Coming Event is, and what the plans of the Global Elite are
regarding same. It seems fairly obvious at this moment in time that
something has signaled
the Secret State that it is time to move on
this, and they will push their agenda no matter how much opposition
or criticism they receive. You can take that to the bank.
In our book:
Ancient Science, we have approached
the matter from a different direction: seeking to uncover the things
that the Global Elite do not want us to know, and to extract from
that exactly what it may be possible to actually do to act in favor
of a DIFFERENT DESTINY!
ADDENDUM: September 2004 In the two years since this article was written, the movement of
people who doubt the official story of 9/11 has grown. There are now
many websites devoted to the question. But how many Americans are
willing to look the facts in the face and confront the truth: the
"attack" of 9/11 was an inside job.
Half a million people have just marched in New York against
They are angry he has brought on war, deficit, tax cuts for the
rich, and the most striking loss of rights ever seen in the USA. But
how many of those 500,000 people know how bad the situation really
is? How many are willing to consider that a group of people in the
Bush government, with the help of Israeli intelligence,
and staged the attacks in order to justify a "war on terror" -- that
is, the Arabs? This war began in Afghanistan and has continued into
Iraq. It looks ready to take in Iran and eventually
countries named in a 1996 report prepared for Israeli PM Netanhayu
by members of the neo-con cabale.
The recent news that the FBI is investigating an "Israeli spy" in
the Pentagon may be the beginning of the end for the
neo-cons. However, behind the neo-cons stand other sections of the
Zionists ready to pick up where their fallen comrades leave off,
other sections of the American military-industrial complex ready to