Hani Hanjour allegedly executes a 330-degree turn at 530 MPH...

Russ Wittenburg, a certified Air Force pilot who flew two types of the planes allegedly used on 9/11, told WingTV that Flight 77 could not possibly have flown at the speeds which the government has claimed.

First, let's meet Hani Hanjour...

Hanjour came to Freeway Airport in Bowie, MD in August, 2001, seeking to rent a small plane.

However, when Hanjour went on three test runs, he had trouble controlling and landing a Cessna 172.

Marcel Bernard, the Chief Flight Instructor at Freeway, deemed Hanjour an unfit pilot and declined to rent him a plane without further lessons.

Danielle O'Brien, an Air Traffic Controller at Dulles International Airport, told ABC News that everybody in the control room thought that Flight 77 was a military plane.

Second, you only have to look at the photos to realize that whatever hit the Pentagon did not bounce off of the lawn.

If Flight 77 had crash landed, and skidded into the Pentagon...

Instead, it looked like this, without a single scratch on the lawn.

Third, the light poles.

On November 22nd, 2004, a private jet en route to Houston to pick up George Bush Senior clipped a single light pole and crashed a minute away from landing at Houston's Hobby Airport.

Fourth, why is there absolutely no trace of Flight 77?

Cnn's Jamie McIntyre was reporting live from the Pentagon, and describes exactly how much of the plane is left...

If flight 77 vaporized upon impact, it would be the first time in aviation history...

For example. August 15th, 2005. Helios Airways Flight 522, a Boeing 737, en route to Athens, Greece crashed into a hillside at full speed. 121 passengers, all dead.

Fire. Tail sections. Wing sections. Engines. Cockpit. Black boxes. Bodies.

Are we supposed to believe that it disappeared into this hole, without leaving any wreckage on the outside?

Why is there no damage where the wings, or the vertical stabilizer, or the engines, would have slammed into the building?

Remember how big the engines were? If six tons of steel and titanium slammed into the Pentagon at 530 MPH, they would bury themselves inside the building, leaving two very distinct imprints...

And yet, the only damage to the Pentagon is this single hole, with no damage from where the engines would have hit.

Why are the windows next to the hole completely intact?

Why are the cable spools in front of the hole completely untouched?

 

...Found on the other side of the C Ring, three rings from the impact. For that hole to have been caused by Flight 77, the Boeing would have had to smash through nine feet of steel reinforced concrete.

This is what usually happens to the nose in a plane crash.

If the nose caused this exit hole, why is there no trace of the plane?

So what could blow a 16 foot hole in the outer ring of the Pentagon, smash through 9 feet of steel reinforced concrete, and leave another 16 foot hole?

A cruise missile.

This is what Slobodan Milosevic’s house in Belgrade looked like after a Tomahawk cruise missile hit it.

See any similarities?

So who's telling the truth? Take this into consideration.

April Gallop was working in the Pentagon’s west side when it was hit. In Jim Marrs’ book Inside Job, April claims...

“While in the hospital, men in suits visited her more than once. They never identified themselves or what agency they worked for. They didn’t tell her what to say, just made suggestions. For example, to take the compensation money and shut up. They also kept insisting a plane hit the building. They repeated this over and over. But I was there, and I never saw a plane, or even debris from a plane. I figure this story is to brainwash people."

So if a Boeing 757 didn’t hit the Pentagon, then what did?

Eyewitnesses inside and outside the building were thrown to the ground by what they described as a shockwave.

Even the Sheraton Hotel, 1.6 Miles away, was rocked by the blast.

A number of military personnel at the Pentagon specifically mentioned smelling cordite.

Cordite and jet fuel have two very distinct smells.

Cordite is a compound used in ammunition, which is comprised of nitroguanidine, nitrocellulose, and nitroglycerin.

It is cool-burning, produces little smoke and no flash, but produces a strong detonation wave.

And, eyewitnesses described a bright, silvery flash.

Jet fuel combustion, i.e. the planes that struck the Twin Towers, is bright yellow at best.

See this? A massive, smouldering fireball. No silvery flash. No shockwave.

And at the Pentagon...a tiny, bright, silvery flash, which shakes nearby buildings.

At 9:25, Jane Garvey, the head of the FAA, initiated a national ground stop, which prevents further takeoffs and requires all planes in the air to land. The order, which hasn’t been implemented since 1903, applied to almost every kind of plane; civilian, military, or law enforcement.

Why were these two planes allowed in the air when everyone else had to land?

And finally, why did people keep reporting a second explosion at the Pentagon?

Seventh, surveillance cameras from a gas station, the Sheraton Hotel, and the Virginia Department of Transportation captured the entire thing.

However, the FBI was there within minutes to confiscate the tapes, including a warning for the employees not to discuss what they had seen.

All attempts to have these videos released have been denied.

If the government wishes to prove once and for all that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, all they would have to do is release one of these tapes.

Instead, they released 5 frames from a camera across the heliport (see gif animation), even though none of them show a 757.

And is it merely coincidence that the Pentagon was hit in the only section that was recently being reinforced to withstand that very same kind of attack...

...and that Donald Rumsfeld was safe in his office on the opposite end of the building?

If the government has nothing to hide, why are they so afraid to answer a few questions, or release a few videos?