|
part 9 - THE PHARMACEUTICAL RACKET
In the early half of this century the petrochemical giants
organized
a coup on the medical research establishments, hospitals and
universities. The Rockefellers did this by sponsoring research and
donating monetary gifts to US universities and medical schools where
research was drug based and further extended this policy to foreign
medical establishments via their International Education Board.
Those who were not drug based were refused funding and were soon
dissolved in favour of the more lucrative pharmaceutical-based
projects.
In 1939 the ’Drug Trust’ alliance was formed by the Rockefeller
Empire and
I.G. Farben. After the war, I.G. Farben was dismantled
but later emerged in the many guises of the companies with whom they
had signed cartel agreements. These companies include:
The
Rockefeller Empire – in tandem with the
Chase
Manhattan Bank now owns over half of the USA’s pharmaceutical
interests and is the largest drug manufacturing combine in the
world. Since the war the drug industry has steadily netted an ever
increasing profit from sales of drugs to become the second largest
manufacturing industry in the world next to the arms industry (also
owned by the self same Elite agencies).
Today, health care is a multi-billion pound industry world-wide with
ever increasing expenditure by taxpayers into the system which
funnels the majority of this staggering profit into the hands of the
drug manufacturers who are, as we have seen, headed by the major
Elite manipulators of this century. These companies now control the
vast majority of health care and set the standards for the practice
of medicine in all developed countries. Doctors are no longer free
to choose the most reliable and safe forms of therapy available but
are at the mercy of their financial reliance on sponsoring
(frequently bribing) drug companies. Once out of drug-company
sponsored medical school, doctors embark on a career of increasing
workloads and have ever increasing amounts of new pharmaceutical
products to use and understand. The sheer volume of literature which
a GP will receive from drug sales reps has resulted in the present
situation whereby GPs are poorly educated about the chemicals which
they are giving to their patients and are essentially gleaning most
of their post-graduate training from the salesmen of private
business. The moral implications of this are staggering.
The number of available drug preparations is now well in excess of
200,000. In 1980, the World Health Organization advised that a mere
240 drugs are necessary in order to provide good health care in the
Third World (which should be more than adequate for First World
needs considering we are a significantly healthier proportion of the
population) whilst in 1981 the United Nations Industrial Development
Organization stated that a mere 26 of these are
considered ’indispensables’. Most of the many drugs which are now available are
known as ’me-too’ drugs, i.e. recombinations and exact reproductions
of drugs already available but which are irresistible to other
companies who wish to share in their market. For example, the
standard analgesics Paracetamol and Aspirin come in a multitude of
forms under a variety of different brand names and yet these
products can vary in price to a factor of ten or more times for the
exact same formula depending on brand type chosen. Often the
consumer erroneously presumes that increased price is equivalent to
increased quality in this case and are entirely unaware that the
drugs they are buying and those which they are rejecting are
identical. Doctors are also often guilty of prescribing drugs by
trade name and thus netting greater profits for the favoured company
whilst cheaper versions are available to the unwary
consumer/patient. Usually, before handing in a prescription it pays
to consult the attending pharmacist if there is an equivalent and
cheaper drug available. This can save some chronic drug users
hundreds of pounds per year.
Pharmaceutical companies rely upon ill health in the population to
survive and reap their profits. No drug company has a vested
interest in curing disease. They do, however, have a massive vested
interest in maintaining ill-health, creating disease and
manufacturing chemicals which will promote this under the guise of
’therapy’ for the symptoms – rarely ever the cause – of disease. Dr
John Braithwaite, now a Trade Practices Commissioner, in his expose,
Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry, states:
’International bribery and
corruption, fraud in the testing of drugs, criminal negligence
in the unsafe manufacturing of drugs – the pharmaceutical
industry has a worse record of law-breaking than any other
industry.’
In the US in 1978 1.5 million people were
hospitalized because of
medication side-effects alone. In 1991 in the US, 72,000 people were
killed due to iatrogenic – that is doctor-induced – causes whilst
24,073 died of victims of firearms shootings, which makes doctors
nearly three times more lethal than guns! This has serious
implications for other countries including Britain because the US
are the foremost pioneers in the health care field and what occurs
in health care in the US is usually implemented in Britain a decade
later.
The drugs industry has managed to sell to the majority of the world
the idea that disease is largely an inevitable part of life,
especially during the later years. Through its front-line
representatives – the medical system – it has effectively reduced
the range of choices of health care to which the public has access.
Through funding and educational control it has seen to it that
natural forms of treatment are largely ignored and grossly
under-researched. Those organizations which do reveal the true
causes of disease and promote effective forms of disease prevention,
such as nutritional medicine, healing and naturopathy are regularly
attacked in the mass media and publicly labelled as quacks by
pharmaceutically-sponsored de-bunking organizations such as the
Campaign Against Health Fraud, now called Healthwatch.
They have also sold to us the idea that natural remedies and cures
which have been successfully employed for centuries are ’alternatives’ and to be treated with great
skepticism and caution.
Frequently, we are told of how one or two people have been injured
or killed through the misapplication of a herbal remedy by dubious
alternative practitioners but are not told at the same time of the
thousands who are damaged by the conventional drugs which are handed
out like sweets by our doctors.
During their initiation into the Western medical tradition most of
our young doctors are repeatedly informed by their superiors that
therapies which are
alternative to classic western medicine are
fraudulent and quackish. They are told that there is no scientific
evidence to support any of the claims of psychic healing,
crystal
therapy, colour therapy and the like and the whole area is dismissed
with a superior grin and a wave of the hand. A mountain of study is
then hurled at the junior doctors, on top of an already inhumane
workload of practical hours, to be spent absorbing the biased views
of their forebears. A junior doctor has not even enough time to
explore the realms of stress-free relaxation never mind alternative
thought and therapies. Much the same methods are used by certain
religious organizations to indoctrinate the minds of their followers
into a single belief system. The key tactics, to which most doctors
will relate, are: maintenance of sleep deprivation so as to minimize
resistance to teachings, isolation from the outside world until one
is literally eating, breathing and sleeping the set doctrine of the
cult, and maintenance of a fear of failure to conform through almost
unachievably high level goal setting; often via frequent
examinations.
I believe that western medicine is as much a dogmatic cult as
popular Christianity or the Moonies. It breeds its young on dogma to
the exclusion of free will and reasoned thought in order to
perpetuate itself. It is controlled by instilling into its members
the fear of failure and it thrives by exploiting the initial
motivation of its members, which is love and a desire to help and
heal others.
At the apex of the pyramid of medicine lie the controllers;
not
doctors, but the multinational pharmaceutical companies who exist,
not for the benefit of others, but for the desire for money and
power. And behind them lies the sinister organization of global
secret societies headed by
the Illuminati.
It is through this subtle mind control that the System maintains
itself. Veiled in secrecy and fuelled by fear, the monster machine
controls every aspect of our lives. The medical system is an
integral part, but nevertheless only one aspect, of the overall
design which seeks power and neither cares how this power is
achieved, nor how many individuals are destroyed in the process.
As an example of the fraud perpetuated by the pharmaceutical
companies, the next section will take a close look at the AIDS
scandal, which illuminates how these companies have infiltrated
every area of the healthcare system are willing to endanger people,
allowing them to be killed, for profit via the industry’s tool of
corruption and front organization, our own medical system:
What is AIDS?
AIDS is defined as any one of twenty five unrelated diseases plus a
positive test for the presence of antibodies to the Human Immuno-deficiency
Virus (HIV). It is said to be transferred through intimate sexual
contact via the transfer of bodily fluids such as semen and blood.
It is also said to be passed on through intravenous means by
needle-sharing drug users and infected blood transfusions.
Nearly five hundred scientists world-wide, including eminent doctors
such as leading University of California Professor of Molecular
Biology, Peter Duesberg, and Australian biophysicist Eleni
Papadopoulous-Eleopoulos, Dr Charles Thomas (former Harvard
Professor of Biochemistry), Dr Kary Mullis (1993 Nobel Prize-winner
for Chemistry), Dr Hank Loman (Professor of Biophysical Chemistry,
Free University of Amsterdam), and Dr Steven Lomas (Professor of
Preventative Medicine, State University of New York) are now
convinced that AIDS is not caused by HIV.
In simple terms, the facts just do not add up. For example, there
are many people with AIDS but without HIV and vast numbers of people
who are HIV positive are not developing AIDS. The tests for the
presence of retrovirus HIV – the Western Blot Test and the
ELISA
Test – which show up HIV positive status, are so inaccurate that
false positive tests can occur due to many diseases such as
malnutrition, multiple infections, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis,
leprosy, having once had the ’flu’ or measles and the bodies natural
response to anal semen.
Once diagnosed as HIV positive, patients are given regular blood
tests to monitor their immunological responses, particularly for a
drop in T-cell count. T-cells are released in the immune response to
disease to attack invading antigens. A significant T-cell drop, in
many clinics, is the indicator that active drug therapy should be
commenced. However, using T-cell counts as an indicator of disease
is entirely useless as the average T-cell count for a healthy person
can range from 200 to 2000 over the course of a normal day.
Professor Ian Weller, who co-ordinated the British arm of the
Concorde AZT trial testing the drug on healthy HIV-positive
volunteers, commented:
’The thing we have to remember
about CD4 (T-cell) counts is they are very variable. They
can vary in an individual over the time of day... lower in
the morning and higher in the evening. They can be affected
by things that you do such as walking to the clinic, as
opposed to riding a bike... the amount of sunshine can
affect them. Smoking as well.’
This whole area of inaccurate testing in the area of
AIDS and AIDS
Related Conditions (ARC) has accounted for many people being
incorrectly diagnosed as HIV positive, such as in Africa where there
is a supposed epidemic; there is also a massive amount of otherwise
unrelated disease there too and it is this factor which is causing
the false positives.
Once diagnosed, patients are then initiated onto courses of highly
toxic drugs such as AZT, DDI and Septrin, many of the side effects
of which are the self same symptoms as those of AIDS.
None of these AIDS defining diseases are new. What is new, however,
is the HIV test. All research into this syndrome has been based upon
the findings of Robert Gallo, the co-founder and patent holder of
the test, which have since been found to be fraudulent. Gallo’s
partner and co-founder of the HIV theory, Luc Montagnier, declared
in 1989:
’HIV is not capable of causing the destruction to the immune system
which is seen in people with AIDS’.
One medical doctor who has practised and lectured on medicine
world-wide for over thirty five years, Dr. Robert E. Wilner has even
publicly demonstrated that HIV does not cause disease by injecting
himself with the blood of an HIV positive patient on Spain’s most
popular television show; yet this never made it to the press outside
of Spain! In his book ’Deadly Deception: The Proof That Sex And HIV
Absolutely Do Not Cause AIDS’, Dr. Wilner cites AZT
as one of the
major causes of AIDS, he also insists that,
’HIV is simply a harmless
piece of tissue, not unlike numerous other retroviruses that exist
in our body’ and that ’AIDS is not transmitted
sexually nor is it contagious by any method!’
Dr Duesberg, recognized as one of, if not the foremost retrovirus
expert in the world, points out:
’AZT is A
Random Killer Of Infected And Non-Infected Cells.
AZT cannot discriminate among them. It kills
T-cells, B-cells, red cells, it kills all cells. AZT
is a chain terminator of DNA synthesis of
all cells – no exceptions. It wipes out everything. In
the long run it can only lead to death of the organism – and
the cemetery. AZT is a certain killer! Who
will be responsible for the death of patients (some 200,000
now being treated with AZT and countless
thousands who have already died from it in the past decade)
that results from AZT therapy –
pharmacological homicide?’
And furthermore, that:
’HIV does
not cause AIDS... The point that
everyone is missing is that all of those original papers,
Gallo wrote on HIV have been found
fraudulent... The HIV hypothesis
was based on those papers.’
It is my opinion that these scientists are correct and that
HIV is
not the cause of AIDS. AIDS is not a single viral disease but a
collection of, in part, unrelated diseases which are caused by
disharmonious energies in the fields of the holistic body, brought
about by all sorts of reasons. Undoubtedly one of the major causes
of death by AIDS-related diseases is the inability of the body to
fight off the manifested disease because the body has been weakened
by the very drugs given to suppress the disease. Tests have shown
that the only effective treatments for AIDS are those which involve
the cessation of conventional drugs in favour of unconventional
natural therapies such as Essiac, Oxygen/Ozone Therapy and
CanCell.
However, these natural therapies share a common theme in that they
have all been suppressed or withdrawn by governmental agencies and
those with vested interests in the pharmaceutical industry.
(To further support the fact that
HIV is not transferred sexually,
Cathy O’Brien in her book
Trance Formation Of America, points out
that, despite being prostituted to men in areas supposedly rife with
AIDS, none of her political abusers ever wore protection during sex
with her.)
Wellcome to Hell
Wellcome (Wellcome Burroughs in the US) began as a pharmaceutical
company set up in 1880 by Henry Wellcome and Silas Burroughs. Its
links to the Rockefeller Empire were apparent in Henry Wellcome’s
appointing of John and Allen Dulles of the Sullivan and Cromwell law
firm as those responsible for any legal matters relating to the
company and his own will. With Henry Wellcome’s death in 1936, the
Wellcome Trust was set up in conjunction with the company (now the
Wellcome Foundation) and this has now become one of the largest
funders of medical research in Europe. The
Rockefeller connection
was also strengthened in the late 50’s when Wellcome took over the
running of aspects of the Rockefeller funded London University
College Hospital Medical School and their joint interests in
tropical illness research via the London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine.
Over the following decades, Wellcome pursued several aspects of
pharmaceutical healthcare with interests in general over-the-counter
remedies, anti-virals, animal healthcare, genetic engineering and
biotechnology. It strengthened its connections within the
government, the media, medical academia and the various committees,
societies and associations that were continuously being set up to
review, regulate and control all aspects of scientific medical
research and education. It did this by making donations to many of
these organizations, such as the British Association for the
Advancement of Science, the Parliamentary Science and Technology
Foundation, the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, and
the British Medical Association’s Foundation for AIDS (to which it
gave £144,000 between 1988 and 1992), and by placing its own
trustees, researchers and ’experts’ in prominent positions within
them.
For example:
-
Sir Alastair Pilkington one time vice president
of the Foundation for Science and Technology was a research
scientist for Wellcome
-
Professor C. Gordon Smith, Dean of the
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine was a Wellcome
trustee
-
Lord Swann, Director of the BBC in the 1980’s was a Wellcome trustee
-
Sir Alfred Shepperd, a member of the Advisory
Council on Science and Technology(ACST) was Chairman of Burroughs
Wellcome and the Wellcome Foundation until 1985
-
Professor Roy
Anderson, Head of Pure and Applied Biology at London Imperial
College of Science, Technology and medicine and a member of ACST was
also a Wellcome trustee
In the 1980’s however, the company went through some major rationalisations. In 1986 the decision was made to sell shares in
the Welcome drug company which had previously been owned in its
entirety by the Wellcome Trust. In the following six years it also
sold off several areas of business including Cooper Animal
Healthcare – a joint venture with ICI producing organo-phosphate
sheep dip – and its interests in vaccine production. Production of
general cough and cold remedies was also reduced to a mere 14% of
sales while it began concentrating its funds in the more profitable
areas of genetics, biotechnology and anti-virals.
AZT, marketed by
Wellcome as Retrovir, had been developed in the 60s
as a drug to treat cancer but it had proved to be highly toxic as
well as ineffective as it appeared unable to distinguish between
cancerous and healthy cells. However, tests in vitro appeared to
show some anti-viral properties which was why, after being shelved
in the 60s, AZT was re-tested for use in the treatment of
AIDS in
the 1980s.
Human clinical drug trials, following extensive (though useless)
animal testing, usually take place in two parts. Phase I tests for
toxicity; Phase II concentrates on the long-term side-effects and
efficacy, all of which can take several years. In the case of AZT
the Phase II trials in America were halted after 4 months when only
1 of the AZT users as opposed to 19 of the control group had died
and the drug was granted a license despite the fact that the
patients in the trial were given regular blood transfusions to
alleviate the possible side-effects (this should, under usual
circumstances, have negated the results of the trial). This
licensing of AZT so quickly was unprecedented and made
Wellcome’s
profits double to £1132 million in the space of 4 years! As if this
wasn’t enough, subsequent licenses for other AIDS drugs were issued
subject to the condition that they would have to be tested against
AZT and then only prescribed in conjunction with it.
Incredibly, AZT was licensed in the UK without any clinical trials
four weeks before it was licensed in the US. This, perhaps, may have
been due to the fact that, of the 25 members of the Medicines
Commission who are parliamentary advisers on medicine, 5 had
interests in Wellcome; one prominent member being Professor Trevor
M. Jones, Director of Research and Development at Wellcome. And of
the 21 members of the Committee on the Safety of Medicines who grant
the licenses, two had interests in the Welcome Foundation.
Within a short space of time, AZT was licensed in 35 countries
around the world and Wellcome were promoting it with media
advertising, press releases and all-expenses-paid conferences to
which they regularly invited the world’s top scientists and
physicians, all the while denying any suggestions that it caused
harmful side-effects.
Wellcome’s influence on the media and the government continued with
its donation of £10,000 to the All Party Parliamentary Group on AIDS
(APOGA) as, with the Medical Research Council,
Wellcome began the
trials of AZT on asymptomatic HIV positive patients – the
Concorde
trials – in October 1988. From that point onwards most of the
doctors presenting information and writing for APGOA were also
involved in these trials. Not content with promoting their own
research in the area of AIDS they also began to attack any
alternative treatments or anyone who challenged the HIV=AIDS
hypothesis.
Wellcome had also cornered the British market in
AIDS testing kits.
With the help of Dr. Robin Weiss and Angus Dalgleish from the
Institute of Cancer Research, a second generation kit was marketed
based on the research by Campaign Against Health Fraud (now
Healthwatch) member, Professor Vincent Marks, head of the
Biochemistry Department of Surrey University – a department which
has received over half a million pounds from Wellcome since 1985. In
order to ensure that anyone found to be HIV positive was immediately
directed towards ’help’ from AZT-promoting doctors, GP’s were given
very limited access to the testing kits. They had no choice but to
send their patients to Wellcome-infiltrated teaching hospitals and
STD clinics in London while the promotion and sale of home testing
kits was banned in the UK (in 1992), thereby ensuring Wellcome’s
complete monopoly in all aspects of AIDS treatment and diagnosis.
Education about HIV and AIDS could also not be overlooked and
Wellcome donated substantial funds to pay for a £150,000 package for
GPs, produced by the British Medical Association.
The Concorde trials themselves, instead of being independent, were
almost totally under Wellcome’s influence. The initial reason for
the trials was to prove that AZT would be effective in preventing
the development of ARC and AIDS in otherwise healthy
HIV+ patients.
Going against all established regulations for the independence of
such trials, which in the past had the drug companies supplying the
drug and paying the hospitals to do the trials, the Concorde trial
was set up jointly between Wellcome, the Medical Research Council (MRC)
and the Department of Health. The MRC paid for the treatment and the
Department of Health granted the use of six London hospitals,
NHS
staff and facilities. Anyone with an HIV positive test was
encouraged to join the trial without discussion of any alternative
treatments whilst being promised up to 3 years of free healthcare
despite the fact that the AZT drug was to be administered at 1000mg
per day – twice the dose recommended by the US Food and Drug
Administration – and the recent reports of serious side-effects such
as muscle wasting, anaemia and impotence. Wellcome’s crowning glory
in this deal, though, was to also insist that the contract gave them
complete control over the writing of any reports about the trial.
The only report which had to be agreed between all parties was the
one for general publication, if indeed any published report was even
deemed necessary.
Just to make absolutely sure of obtaining the desired outcome,
Wellcome had the help of several ’friends’ in the MRC who had just
as many, if not more, commitments to industry and business matters
than they did to the medical establishment or the government.
-
Lord Jellicoe, Chairman of the MRC’s AIDS committee, was a director of
the Rockefeller company Morgan Crucible as well as the sugar company
Tate and Lyle and was later chairman of Booker Tate confectionery;
-
Sir Donald Acheson worked for the Department of Health but left in
1991 to work in the Rockefeller funded School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine;
-
Sir Austin Bide was Chief Executive of Glaxo (now
in partnership with Wellcome) and had been a director of J. Lyons &
Co confectionery in the 70’s.
-
Sir David Crouch, MP for Canterbury
until 1987, was director of Pfizer Ltd., a pharmaceutical company
which was the only manufacturer of a synthesised ingredient of
AZT
at that time and also ran several public relations companies one of
which, Kingsway Rowland, handled Wellcome’s AZT account;
-
Dr J. W. G.
Smith, director of the Public Health Laboratory Service since 1985
used to be a Senior Lecturer at the School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine before going to work for Wellcome as head of Bacteriology
in 1969;
-
Professor D. A. Warrell was a director of the
Wellcome
Tropical Research Unit and has also done malaria research funded by
Wellcome and the Rockefeller Foundation;
-
Professor C. N. Hales is a
specialist in diabetes whose research is often funded by
pharmaceutical companies including Wellcome.
With the above as the only 8 members of the MRC Committee on AIDS
and their Chairman Lord Jellicoe, it is not surprising that a drug
once deemed to be too toxic, which has never been properly tested
and whose side-effects, according to the British National Formulary,
bear s striking resemblance to the symptoms of AIDS itself, has been
allowed to become the AIDS drug of the 90’s and has kept the profits
rolling in for Wellcome to the tune of an estimated £400 million a
year.
’I will give no deadly medicine to
any one if asked.’
(from the Hippocratic Oath)
Walter’s position as a staff nurse at
Newcastle General Hospital’s
Infectious Disease Unit (ward 25), which is affiliated with the
London School of Tropical Medicine, has given me an insight into the
world of AIDS treatment which is rarely seen and it only serves to
corroborate the research of the aforementioned enlightened
scientists, whose numbers are ever increasing. The world of AIDS
care and treatment at the NGH has some very sinister elements and I
have no reason to suspect that it is isolated to this regional unit
alone. Here is an outline of some of the information which Walter
has provided:
According to the code of conduct provided by the
United Kingdom
Central Council for nursing and midwifery, the nurse’s role is to be
the patient’s advocate and is, therefore, entrusted to provide care
in the best interest of the patient and to decline from doing
anything which is detrimental to their well being. One of the major
areas covered by this is in the administration of drugs; the nurse
is responsible for ensuring the correct dosage of drug is given and
is responsible also for being aware of the effects and possible side
effects of the medication.
However, in the NGH
unit, nurses are expected to give all drugs
prescribed by the doctor whether or not any information on the
effects of the drug are available. Frequently the prescribing doctor
is unaware of the true nature of the drugs and thus unable to inform
the nursing staff of the effects and side effects of the drugs they
are using. Many and varied substances appear and disappear
periodically from the drugs cupboard, often named only as a series
of numbers or letters. When challenged as to the reason why they
have prescribed such unknown entities, the doctors usually reply
that their consultant has ordered it to be given. The consultant is
usually unavailable for comment.
The side effects of the drugs have been seen to be
potentially
harmful. For example, one commonly used drug, Foscarnet, which is
given directly into the heart or eyes of a patient, when dropped on
a nurse’s tights dissolved them on contact. Common side effects of
this drug include epilepsy, blindness and dementia. Many patients
have entered the unit with minor symptoms such as weight loss and
have, in a short space of time, become blind and epileptic through
using it. Walter has frequently said to me, ’I’m poisoning people
for a living’, but if he refused to give the drugs as prescribed he
would lose his job and someone would be found who would administer
them. The same is true of the junior doctors who are afraid of the
vengeance from above if they were to challenge the status quo. No
challenge has yet been made, even after I presented the unit with
detailed papers outlining the research which has negated the ’HIV
equals AIDS’ myth.
Once diagnosed as HIV positive, many patients are then informed that
the only chance they have for extended survival is to use the drugs
provided. Obviously the majority of patients, many of whom show very
few symptoms, are too afraid not to co-operate with the regime. They
then suffer terribly and die a lingering and undignified death.
As a response to many challenges Walter has made to the medical
staff to justify their drugs regime, he has been branded cynical and
defeatist; as not wishing to give the patients a chance for
survival. In reply to this he has asked on many occasions for the
doctors to give him even just one example of anyone whom they have
cured of AIDS or significantly improved the quality of life. Not one
of them has been able to give such an example.
Even if we were extending people lives, in doing so we also inflict
upon them such diseases as makes for little or no quality of life.
What is the point of an extra year of life if that year is spent as
a living vegetable? If we do have a prognosis of death, then surely
it is better to live that remaining life to the full with our
eventual demise being as gentle and as dignified as possible.
On one occasion, the unit exceeded its drugs budget and feared a
crisis in care. At this point Wellcome stepped in and offered its
services for free on the condition that they would supply the drugs
as long as all research notes were given directly to them in return.
It appears that the only figures who were aware of anything like the
full picture were the consultants in charge and the research nurse
appointed by the company, none of whom were willing to reveal
anything of the results of these apparently blind drugs trials.
In effect, this means that the patients on this unit are being
treated by the pharmaceutical scientists as human guinea pigs, in
order to test the various drugs supplied. How are we to know that
these drugs are genuinely safe for the purpose of therapy? Might
they simply be poisons or ineffectual chemicals thrown onto the
research pot in a vain attempt to happen across some element of
cure? Are they even actively seeking a cure, knowing what we do of
their motivation?
Some of the drugs which have been identified and are in regular use
have long since been discontinued in other areas of medicine because
they are ineffective and/or dangerous. For example, A.Z.T. was once
considered too toxic to be given to terminally ill cancer patients!
Interestingly, the official patient leaflet, ’HIV and AZT, the
choices’, as supplied to AIDS departments by
Wellcome, gives merely
three examples of side effects of the drug, i.e. anaemia, which they
say effects up to 40% of users; headaches in 1-10% of users; and
sickness in 25% of users which: ’almost always disappear after a few
weeks of treatment’. The leaflet also states:
-
Most people do not suffer side effects when they take
AZT early. If
they do occur, there are ways of coping with them. They may be
reversed, if necessary by stopping treatment.
-
If you thought that you may be facing death through an incurable
disease would you stop taking the drug that has been hyped as giving
an extension of lifespan, I wonder?
-
Septrin is a combination of two antibiotics and has been shown to be
far less effective and far more liable to dramatic side effects than
either of the components when used individually (interestingly, it
is also nearly three times more expensive than the more effective
and less harmful constituent ingredient Trimethorprim).
-
Even Thalidomide is now being used on Ward 25 for its anti-emetic
properties.
Many patients diagnosed as terminally ill have drawn up living wills
in which they often request a cessation of active treatment in the
end stages of disease. These are frequently ignored by the doctors
who continue to pump toxins into dying patients and claim to be
simply following orders from above. The point of which escapes
myself and Walter and quite often the doctors themselves.
When a patient dies, relatives are officially informed that their
loved ones are deemed as dangerous waste and must, therefore, be
sealed and cremated for hygiene reasons. No mention is made of
autopsy or further experimentation and yet Walter has witnessed
conversations amongst doctors regarding autopsy findings on such
people who were supposed to have gone to cremation unmolested. Is
this further pharmaceutical research?
One evening, in the absence of an available doctor from the unit,
Walter had to call upon a consultant from another area to advise
upon a matter. Whilst this covering doctor was attending to the
issue Walter made known his concerns about the dangerous amounts of
drugs a patient was prescribed. This consultant agreed with Walter
that it was excessive and dangerous and complied with his request to
discontinue the majority of the drugs. He also admitted to Walter
that there was definitely something extraordinary and far reaching
going on in this area which was beyond his jurisdiction.
Furthermore, if he had his way, the majority of the drugs given on
the unit would never have been prescribed in the first place.
However, ’see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil’ seemed to be the
order of the day and that was the end of the matter.
All of this information is deeply disturbing. As more and more
evidence mounts against the HIV theory, it seems that the only way
to survive AIDS is to steer clear of the medical profession and its
terrible drugs. If it is true of this one syndrome then how true is
it of other areas of disease? Just how manipulated are we by these
companies? And how much wheeling and dealing is going on behind the
scenes between consultants and pharmaceutical companies which
directly effects our well-being?
AIDS is a huge money spinner providing millions of pounds of profit
per day in drugs sales and its offshoot market of condom sales (Wellcome
also has links with the London Rubber Company). It has instilled a
fear in the heart of our society of free sexual expression and has
given rise to much bigotry from the poorly educated who see
AIDS as
a judgement from God or a punishment for active homosexuality. It
has created a huge charity industry, netting millions of pounds from
the world population to fund further research to rid the world of
this affliction. And how much misery and negativity has it
generated? Further research means more experiments on both animals
and humans. And the figures for economic growth just rise and rise.
Truth – A Cure For All Disease
As another example of the medical conspiracy; would it shock you to
find out that there are, in use today, several medically proven
cures for cancer? One such cure is Essiac and has been in use since
at least 1922; it has no known adverse side effects. It is made from
four common herbs and elevates the immune system. In 1937 it came
within three votes of being legalized as a cancer treatment in
Canada and was passed on to the British Cancer Campaign by its
founder, Rene Caisse, via the Prince of Wales. And yet today, it is
still only available through selected, virtually underground,
outlets world-wide. I have many dozens of case studies which testify
to the efficacy of this treatment (see Appendix IV).
Furthermore, in the 1930s a man named
Royal Raymond Rife developed a
very high powered microscope, almost seven times more powerful than
those in use at the time, which could detect organisms which cause
diseases such as infections and cancers. He did this by illuminating
these organisms at their own specific frequency of light and could,
therefore, examine them and their effects whilst they remained alive
as opposed to killing them first using dye stains or high powered
electron microscopy as was the norm. He then discovered that, by
altering the frequency of their environment microbes could mutate
and change their size and shape to resemble viruses and bacteria
alike, thereby enabling the same microbe to cause many diverse
diseases. For example, the same germs which cause pus – streptococci
– could also become the germs which cause pneumonia –
pneumococci –
in response to an alteration in their environment. Rife also
discovered that by bombarding these organisms with higher
frequencies of light, he could destroy them. He demonstrated that it
was possible to create and destroy cancers at will and succeeded in
curing otherwise terminal patients of this disease, as well as
others such as polio and typhus, in almost 100% of cases.
Today, it is conventionally accepted that single specific germs are
responsible for single specific forms of infection. This theory was
advanced by the French scientist Pasteur but was disputed by his
rival Bechamp who was in favour of the mutation theory known as
pleomorphism. We are rarely informed in text books that, according
to his co-worker, Dr Duclaux, Pasteur himself changed his mind and
revoked his ’germ theory’ in favour of one closer to that of
pleomorphism. However, over 100 years later, Pasteur’s original germ
theory is still the standard working model for the understanding of
the action of microbes in the body.
Many types of bacteria exist in a symbiotic relationship with our
bodies all of the time and only become symptomatic once the physical
body begins to deteriorate due to an unhealthy lifestyle. Bacteria
are then free to scavenge the ’soil’ produced in the disease
process, i.e. when the tissues degenerate to a similar frequency as
the microbes, releasing dead organic matter similar to viruses upon
which these microbes feed (remember Wilner’s definition of the
HIV
retrovirus?). They then excrete this dead matter as waste products
via the bloodstream, faeces or other exudates such as mucous. The
extent to which the bacteria can multiply is limited to the amount
of soil upon which they have to feed and could not be capable of
invading the body to the extent to which science would have us
believe unless there was already an adequate food supply.
Furthermore, as has been demonstrated in Rife’s vibratory work, it
is possible for these microbes to mutate into other forms and even
to cancer-causing agents according to their environmental
conditions, defined by the degree of concentration of waste products
and the vibratory rate.
The subsequent systemic and metabolic
reaction to these toxic excreted waste products, such as sore throat
and high temperature (the body’s natural way of eradicating the
bacteria), are generally the symptoms of diseases which are given
priority in day to day general medical practice, whereupon drugs are
usually given to suppress them. In giving antibiotics we often
succeed in killing the very microbes which are removing the diseased
body’s dead matter during the natural healing process. In doing so
we also open up our bodies to other forms of disease such as fungal
infections which are usually kept at bay by the natural presence of
bacteria.
Another effective cure for AIDS and
cancer has been successfully
employed in clinical practice all over the world for at least fifty
years and is a cure for virtually all germ diseases. This is
Oxygen/Ozone therapy. The principle behind it is simplicity itself
and is the reason why the pharmaceutical companies and drug agencies
are so afraid of it that they have conspired to suppress it also. It
is conventionally accepted that the majority of germs are anaerobic,
which means that they survive without oxygen. Therefore, if one
floods the bloodstream with oxygen, these organisms cannot survive.
Oxygen is one of the fundamental and most necessary elements to
human survival. It exists as air, water and most of our food sources
such as carbohydrates. The human race has evolved in levels of
oxygen far higher than exist in today’s polluted and tree-depleted
world and we are all running on less than is desirable for optimum
health; especially the city-dwellers. Foods and food supplements
which release high levels of oxygen such as in the form of Hydrogen
Peroxide are beneficial to our well-being. Indeed, Hydrogen Peroxide
itself, when taken in dilute form or applied directly to wounds is
one of the most effective antiseptics and healing compounds there
is.
I believe disease is the result of disharmonious energy fields which
can be caused by both physical and non-physical disharmony. Thus, dis-ease can be eradicated by
oxygen therapy because it boosts the
immune system by raising our vibratory rate, thereby making our
bodies healthy. It is a simple fact that disease cannot exist in a
healthy body.
According to the testimonies of international MD’s assembled at the
May 1983 Sixth World Ozone (a concentrated form of Oxygen Therapy)
Conference in Washington, D.C.:
Ozone eliminates... viruses and bacteria from blood, human and
stored... Medical ozone is successfully used on AIDS, Herpes,
Hepatitis, Mononucleosis, Cirrhosis of the liver, Gangrene,
Cardiovascular Disease, Arteriosclerosis, High Cholesterol,
Cancerous Tumours, Lymphomas, Leukaemia... Highly effective on
Rheumatoid and other Arthritis, Allergies of all types... Improves
Multiple Sclerosis, ameliorate Alzheimer’s Disease, Senility and
Parkinson’s... Effective on Proctitis, Colitis, Prostate,
Candidiasis, Trichomoniasis, Cystitis; Externally, ozone is
effective in treating Acne, burns, leg ulcers, open sores and
wounds, Eczema and fungus.
In 1976, the US FDA hindered the progress of this form of therapy by
stating: Ozone is a toxic gas with no known medical uses.
And yet, one doctor using ozone in his work with colonic cancer
patients, Dr Hans Neiper, from Hanover, despite refusing to divulge
the names of his cancer patients, stated in 1987:
’President Reagan is a very nice man.’ And,
’You wouldn’t believe
how many FDA officials or relatives or acquaintances of FDA
officials come to see me in Hanover. You wouldn’t believe this, or
directors of the American Medical Association (AMA), or American
Cancer Association, or the residents of orthodox cancer institutes.
That’s the fact.’
Oxygen/Ozone therapy researcher and ambassador,
Ed McCabe states:
Let’s compare medical ozone therapy with prescription drugs. In 1978
the FDA reported 1.5 million were hospitalized in the USA due to the
side-effects of medication. On the other hand, medical ozone has
been legally used in clinics world-wide on a daily basis since the
forties, and in Germany 644 ozone therapists were surveyed, and they
reported 384,775 patients had received 5,579,238 ozone treatments.
The side-effect rate was only 0.0007% during 5.5 million dosages!
Yet, each year approximately 140,000 people in the US die from
prescription drug usage.
To this day researchers maintain that the
exact causes of and cures
for cancer are unknown whilst many others who claim that they do
know are frequently the victims of a conspiracy of suppression by
governmental agencies and corporate business interests.
It is vital that we understand the true nature of disease if we are
to be effective in its eradication. It is imperative that we use the
total sum of our knowledge to combat disease and work together as a
multi-disciplinarian society, not in isolated, self-interested
units. We must open our eyes to the realities and seek the best of
conventional and unconventional medicine. We must concentrate on why
we are ill and not simply seek to eradicate symptoms of disorders
which we often see as inevitable. Disease is not our natural state,
it is not inevitable. It is an outward physical display of
disharmony whose cause is far more significant than its symptoms.
The responsibility for health lies with all of us, not only with
doctors or governments.
How many millions flock to the doctor and expect some treatment for
a symptom, caring not for the cause but seeking only the relief of
discomfort? And who is to blame them? They are victims of the
pharmaceutical conspiracy too. According to these scientists, and
medical practitioners who find employment within the System, there
is little evidence to give credence to any form of medicine other
than their own. Or so they and we are told.
They seem deaf to the testimonies of
the healers and the healed who
stand before them as living proof of the power of mind over matter,
homeopathy and herbalism etc. It is healthy to be
skeptical but
there is a danger of skeptic thought becoming septic thought if it
fails to reason with an open mind and allow for progress. Any doctor
who fails to open their mind to the information such as is presented
in this book is missing the opportunity to fulfill their true role as
healers of the sick. There is without doubt a conspiracy of
willful
ignorance amongst the cult of western medicine, as even
scientifically verified proof of the healing power of channelled
energy has been ignored by the majority of practitioners.
One smoke-screen which is constantly employed by the major drug
companies is the regular promise that they are ’currently working on
a new form of treatment which could soon revolutionize the treatment
of…’. Such stories are picked up by the press and TV science
programmes with great fervour. They are nearly always described in
terms of ’miracle cure’ and point out that adequate funding is
necessary for the fulfilment of the prophecy in another 2 or 3 years
time. However, when 2 or 3 years time finally arrives we have all
conveniently forgotten about the promised miracle drug whilst
anxiously awaiting the fulfilment of yet further promises of drugs
which are ’hoped’ will one day prove to be the end of yet another
terrible disease.
And this is the industry which denigrates the field of natural
health for taking advantage of the sick and for so cruelly promising
fake cures and providing false hope! The obvious lesson here is that
to disguise your own sins you must accuse your enemies of them and
to always do it before your enemy has a chance to formulate their
defense. Mud usually sticks to the one it first lands upon. This a
political trick which has been used to devastating effect by the key
manipulators of this century in all areas and has been used to shift
public opinion in favour of some of the greatest atrocities ever
committed.
The Elite via chemo-pharmaceutical companies and
food and water
production services penetrate all areas of health care and use it to
promote and execute their policies of population control, mind
control and ’divide and rule’, whilst making vast sums of money into
the bargain.
Vivisection – far more than an animal rights issue!
This section is intended to be read in order that the sinister
implications of animal experiments upon the whole of mankind are
thoroughly understood. I am aware, from personal experience of
street campaigning for animal rights issues, that many people who
care passionately about animals find it simply too distressing to
see or read any form of evidence to this effect. Consequently, I
have chosen not to give practical details about individual animal
experiments in the coming discourse
Instead I will focus upon the scientific fraud perpetrated by
vivisectors and how their warped ethos that vivisection is a
valuable scientific tool has corrupted the progress of medicine and
upset the delicate balance of the minds of millions world-wide. I
seek to show how vivisection is an integral part of the manipulation
of society (the vivisectors themselves being amongst the most
completely manipulated of all) by the very same consciousness and
indeed the very same people I have already discussed.
Nothing is worse than vivisection!
No other single factor causes
more pain, distress and death to humans and animals.
Nor is there any less scientific or ethical method of research
currently being employed in industry or educational establishments
anywhere in the world.
Unless you have read the books and seen the video footage which I
and thousands of other anti-vivisection campaigners have been
required to endure, nothing in your imagination can paint for you
anything like the true picture of the hell of animal experiments. In
fact, if you can conjure up the most heinous spectacle of abuse
within your mind, be assured that this is precisely what is being
done today, but probably much worse, around the world in schools,
universities and research labs owned by private companies – and then
some. It is being done with our money, and in order to provide huge
mega-wealthy pharmaceutical companies with staggering profit and as
an excuse to provide jobs for vivisectors. It is also perpetuated to
ensure that mankind never becomes learned about the true nature,
cause and cure of disease.
Two thousand animals per minute die as a result of gruesome
experiments; that is 250 million per year; approximately 3.5 million
per year in Great Britain alone. Over 75% of these experiments are
done without anaesthetics, and when they are, they are often
inadequately applied. Most experiments are done with public money.
0.2% of the animals used are for the testing of cosmetics. In
Britain there are merely 19 Home Office inspectors to cover 20,000
licensed vivisectors.
The practise of animal experimentation has been the mainstay of
medical and biological research since the early 1800s even though it
has brought about not one major breakthrough in medical science. And
yet, every medical student, in order to pass his or her exam and
advance in their chosen career must quote the results of animal
experiments.
How can respect for life, compassion and empathy be taught to and
nurtured in our doctors through a practice which necessitates the
ignorance of pain, suffering, anxiety terror and death, as is the
case with the training process of US doctors who regularly dissect
live animals as part of their training? The answer is simple: It
can’t.
The animal experimenters are the cornerstone of the highly corrupt
and manipulative pharmaceutical industry. These are a
pseudo-scientific fraternity who earn vast amounts of money for
their employers by performing unbelievably barbaric experiments
which can be used to (falsely) substantiate claims that their drugs
are safe for human use. Dr. James D. Gallagher, Director of Research
of Lederle Laboratories in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, March 14, 1964 stated:
’Animal studies are done for
legal reasons and not for scientific reasons. The predictive
value for such studies for man is meaningless – which means
our research may be meaningless.’
There is no British or European law which states that new drugs,
chemicals or cosmetics must be tested on animals. However, animal
testing ensures that vivisectors get the results they want in order
to sell their dangerous chemicals to an unwary public. In numerous
legal trials of drug companies who have caused fatalities and
injuries, the most effective defence which has been used time and
again is that:
’All of the usual and required testing had been done
to establish the safety of the drug in question’.
A standpoint which
most legal authorities are not qualified to dispute. Indeed, the ’experts’ upon whom they call for advice in such matters are
invariably members of other drug companies or drug sponsored
agencies and therefore the animal testing fraternity.
Animal experiments have been cited in many court battles over drugs
damages claims and have been used both to defend the idea that such
disasters were unforeseen because adequate testing had been
employed, but have also been successfully used, as in the
Thalidomide case in December 1970, to admonish the drug company (in
this case Chemie Grunenthal) who testified that animal tests could
never be conclusive for humans.
The very idea that a test or operation done on an animal will show
results which are directly translatable to humans is plainly
ridiculous. As has been stated by some of the greatest and most
influential physicians in medical history: the anatomy, physiology
and psychology of animals is entirely different to our own in many
ways, and this difference is further exaggerated in the case of
animals bred for and/or housed in laboratories. This can be plainly
illustrated in many ways; here are just a few:
-
The LD 50 (Lethal Dose 50%) test, which is the standard toxicity
technique used to establish how much of a chemical toxin is required
to kill half of a number of animals. These animals are specifically
bred to be exactly identical in every way, i.e. genetically and
physically they are the same size and weight. And yet, an equivalent
dose of a toxin, in equal quantity and strength will succeed in
killing merely half of the batch whilst leaving half to suffer
varying degrees of disablement. These results are then haphazardly
translated to give the figure for safe and fatal levels for humans.
-
There are 12 different methods which determine statistically the
safety of chemicals for humans from animal experiments. These may
disagree by up to a factor of four.
-
It is accepted that animal tests are successful in identifying
cancer-causing agents in only 37% of cases. This means, in effect,
that the results of the tests are more times wrong than right and
are significantly statistically worse than tossing a coin.
As stated by Hans Ruesch in
The Naked Empress or the Great Medical
Fraud:
-
’Two grams of scopolamine kill a human being, but dogs and cats can
stand hundred times higher dosages.
-
A single Aminata phalloides
mushroom can wipe out a whole human family, but is health food for
the rabbit, one of the favourite laboratory animals.
-
A porcupine can
eat one lump without discomfort as much opium as a human addict
smokes in two weeks, and wash it down with as much prussic acid to
poison a regiment of soldiers.
-
The sheep can swallow enormous
quantities of arsenic, once the murderer’s favourite poison.
-
Morphine, which calms and anaesthetises man, causes maniacal
excitement in cats and mice.
-
On the other hand our sweet almond can
kill foxes, our common parsley is poisonous to parrots, and our
revered penicillin strikes another favourite laboratory animal dead
– the guinea pig.’
It is fortunate for many that penicillin was never tested on guinea
pigs at the outset where it would have immediately been discarded as
dangerous. And if you want to prove that vitamin C is useless,
withhold it from the diet of dogs – which produce vitamin C in the
gut. Moreover, the whole discipline of surgery and post surgical
recovery was hindered for hundreds of years after the Greek
Galen
(Second Century AD) showed through animal experimentation that the
principle laid down by Hippocrates (Fifth century BC) was incorrect
– that hygiene and a good diet (as well as establishing the simple
fact that nature heals) was essential to good health and medicine.
Galen maintained this standpoint, which seems bizarre by today’s
standards, because animals did not readily succumb to infections
following childbirth and surgical procedures. Galen’s animal
experiments caused a rejection of Hippocratic values and a reduction
in surgical asepsis. This destructive attitude was supported by the
Catholic Church and was only substantially reversed in the 1800s
following the discovery of the germ and how cleanliness and sterilisation could prevent bacterial infection.
The following is a list of drugs which were passed as safe for human
consumption on the back of animal tests and the damage which they
subsequently caused:
-
Eraldin (for heart disease) – Corneal damage including blindness.
-
Paracetamol (painkiller) – 1,500 people had to be hospitalised in
Great Britain in 1971.
-
Orabilex – caused kidney damages with fatal outcome.
-
MEL/29 (anti-hypertensive) – caused cataracts.
-
Methaqualone (hypnotic) – caused severe psychic disturbances leading
to at least 366 deaths, mainly through murder or suicide.
-
Thalidomide (tranquilliser) – caused 10,000 malformed children.
-
Isoproterenol (asthma) – caused 3,500 deaths in the sixties.
-
Stilboestrol (prostate cancer) – caused cancer in young women.
-
Trilergan (anti-allergic) – caused viral hepatitis.
-
Flamamil (rheumatism) – caused loss of consciousness.
-
Phenformin (diabetes) – caused 1,000 deaths annually until
withdrawn.
-
Atromid S (cholesterol) – caused deaths from cancer, liver,
gallbladder and intestinal disease.
-
Valium (tranquilliser) – addictive in moderate doses.
-
Preludin & Maxiton (diet pills) – caused serious damage to the heart
and the nervous system.
-
Nembutal (insomnia) – caused insomnia.
-
Pronap & Plaxin (tranquilliser) – killed many babies.
-
Phenacetin (painkiller) – caused severe damages to kidneys and red
blood corpuscles.
-
Amydopyrine (painkiller) – caused blood disease.
-
Marzine (nausea) – damaged children.
-
Reserpine (anti-hypertensive) – increased risks of cancer of the
brain, pancreas, uterus, ovaries, skin and women’s breasts.
-
Methotrexate (leukaemia) – caused intestinal haemorrhage, severe
anaemia and rumours.
-
Urethane (leukaemia) – caused cancer of liver, lungs and bone
marrow.
-
Mitotane (leukaemia) – caused kidney damage.
-
Cyclophosphamide (cancer) – caused liver and lung damage.
-
Isoniazid (tuberculosis) – caused liver destruction.
-
Kanamycin (tuberculosis) – caused deafness and kidney destruction.
-
Chloromycetin (typhoid) – caused leukaemia, cardiovascular collapse
and death.
-
Phenolphthalein (laxative) – caused kidney damage, delirium and
death.
-
Clioquinol (diarrhoea) – caused blindness, paralysis and death.
-
DES (prevent miscarriage) – caused birth defects and cancer.
-
Debendox (nausea) – caused birth defects.
-
Accutane (acne) – caused deafness and kidney destruction.
(Taken from Vivisection: Science or Sham by Dr. Roy Kupsinel, and
Naked Empress by Hans Ruesch)
Vivisectors often claim credit for many advances in medicine which
have been brought about by non-vivisection methods. Frequently, they
will quote animal experiments which show the same results without
also disclosing the pioneering previous non-animal discovery. One
example of this is the case of vaccinations. Whilst it is certainly
true that many diseases which have decimated mankind for centuries,
such as polio, smallpox, whooping cough, tuberculosis, diphtheria
and tetanus have seen a dramatic decline over the last century or
so, it is not because of the introduction of vaccinations. Figures
show that such diseases were long in decline before the introduction
of vaccinations and that the rate of fall was severely impeded once
they were introduced. Advances in hygiene, sanitation,
nutrition and
wealth status are the obvious reasons for the improvement of the
world’s health overall. Vaccinations are responsible for causing
many of the diseases they are supposed to cure as well as
compromising the immune systems of the vulnerable, especially babies
who are statistically more likely to suffer Sudden Infant Death
Syndrome within weeks of having their initial standard vaccinations.
The vivisectionists are master manipulators. They invest huge
amounts of money in massive PR organisations such as the Research Defence Society in the UK. Furthermore, they have infiltrated many
areas of the Anti-Vivisection (AV) movement and have created much
confusion in the minds of the public as to the truth behind this
barbaric trade in misery. An example of this was highlighted in
possibly the greatest expose of vivisection industry ever written,
The Slaughter of the Innocent by Hans Ruesch:
An interesting case was the Animal Protection league of Basel. Its
president, Dr Rudolph Schenkel, professor of ethology,
criticized
the revival of antivivisectionist feeling in Switzerland.
Thereafter, the establishment press could write that ’even the
animal defenders disapprove of the antivivisectionists’ views.’ A
closer look at Schenkel revealed that:
-
His league had received a donation of 200,000 Swiss francs (about
$100,000) from Hoffman-La Roche, ’for its animal shelter’ – with no
questions asked.
-
His own wife was experimenting on animals in the endocrinology
department of Ceiba-Geigy.
When my CIVIS organization brought about these facts,
Schenkel
dropped all pretence of being an animal protectionist: at the next
convention of Swiss animal protection groups (SPCAs), he argued that
’since laboratory animals are a product of human enterprise, we can
do with them as we please.’ (My highlight added.)
(This infiltration tactic is not solely within the realms of the
AV
movement but is widespread throughout the animal rights movement.
This is exemplified at present by the large scale enrolment of
blood-sports practitioners [fox and stag hunters etc.] with the
RSPCA whereby they are steadily creating a significant policy
influencing force by taking advantage of the apathy of many members
who do not turn out to vote upon Society matters. The RSPCA also has
financial investments in companies that support vivisection.)
The smoke-screen perpetuated by vivisectors that it is preferable to
test drugs on animals than on humans, and the emotive stance that
’it’s your child or an animal’, is probably the most effective way
that they ensure public support for their industry. What they always
fail to say is that all drugs are tested on humans immediately after
the animal trials and often without the patient’s knowledge or
consent. Those that are informed of the trial are usually reassured
to know that ’animal studies have shown the drug to be safe’.
AV supporters are simply people who have come to
realize the truth
about this situation and have committed themselves to being a part
of the process of change and reformation to abolish this massive and
system of cruel fraud, both for the sake of the animals and humans.
However, they are usually portrayed in the media as extremists; an
inevitable side-effect of a necessary evil. Ordinary people who are
deemed responsible enough to bear and raise children, minister to
the sick, save lives, handle the nation’s wealth, run for political
seats etc., once they have made an AV stance, are immediately
demoted to, at best ’irrational’ and ’oversensitive’, or, at worst,
’people-hating terrorists’ with no right to express an opinion about
such matters. Once branded as such they are given about as much
regard as are the animals in the laboratory cages and are made
largely impotent on the political scene because MPs do not consider
it a wise career move or vote winner to consort with anyone
considered to be extremist.
In the case of vivisection, the public is all too willing to accept
that it is a necessary part of modern progress and not really cruel
at all. One reason for this is because the alternative, i.e. the
truth, is almost too great a burden to accept. Such a stance is
often taken in defence of one’s own sanity as a mental survival
technique in order that one does not go mad with the anger, sorrow,
frustration and terrible empathy which the idea of vivisection
evokes in us. Therefore, the vivisectors have yet another advantage
over the masses in the battle to keep them convinced of the verity
of their cause, whilst the AV organizations have to face a perpetual
uphill struggle against the tide of wealth, mind control, tradition
and human apathy which is forever on the side of the manipulators.
As George Bernard Shaw once stated, ’Whoever doesn’t hesitate to
vivisect will hardly hesitate to lie about it’.
By creating a
’healthcare’ (more accurately termed ’ill-healthcare’)
system which relies upon the misleading results of animal
experiments, the manipulators of this century have ensured that,
within the system, the true causes and cures for disease will never
be revealed. This in turn creates a self-perpetuating industry for
the multinationals who, by creating disease via their drugs, can be
assured of massive funding in order to discover:
a) the reason for
the drug error, which is guaranteed to involve further animal
studies, and
b) further drugs to treat the results of the initial
drug error.
In the, by now, all too familiar pattern: the
manipulators perpetuate the problem of a state of global ill health
and therefore the need for the solution which is offered in the form
of more and more pharmaceutical involvement.
For the sake of your selves, your children and the animals:
WAKE UP
PEOPLE! Take back your power over your own health and stop
supporting these barbaric and sick individuals. Only you can do
this. The time to do this is now.
Go
Back
|