INSTITUTlONS THROUGH WHICH
CONTROL IS EXERCISED
Go Back
Section 1
Profiling is a technique developed in 1922 on command of the
Royal
Institute for International Affairs (RIIA). Major John Rawlings
Reese, a British Army technician, was instructed to set up the
largest brainwashing facility in the world at the Tavistock
Institute for Human Relations as a part of Sussex University. This
became the core of Britain’s Psychological Warfare Bureau. When I
first introduced the names of Reese and Tavistock into the United
States in 1970, very little interest was shown. But over the years,
as I revealed more and more about Tavistock and its vital role in
the conspiracy, it has become popular to imitate my earlier
research.
Britain’s Psychological Warfare Bureau made extensive use of the
work done by Reese on his 80,000 British Army guinea pigs, captive
soldiers who underwent many forms of testing. It was Tavistock-designed methods that got the United States into the
Second World War and which, under the guidance of Dr. Kurt Lewin,
established the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA.
Lewin became the director of the Strategic Bombing Survey,
which was a plan for the Royal Air Force to concentrate on bombing
German worker housing while leaving military tar-gets, such as
munition plants, alone. The munition plants on both sides belonged
to the international bankers who had no wish to see their assets
destroyed.
Later, after the war was over, NATO ordered Sussex University to
establish a very special brainwashing center which became part of
Britain’s Psychological Warfare Bureau, only now, its research was
directed toward civilian rather than military applications. We
shall return to that super secret unit which was called Science
Policy Research Institute (SPRI) under our chapters on drugs.
The idea behind saturation bombing of civilian worker housing was to
break the morale of the German worker. It was not designed to affect
the war effort against the German military machine. Lewin and his
team of actuaries reached a target figure, that if 65% of German
worker housing was destroyed by nightly RAF bombing, the morale of
the civilian population would collapse. The actual document was
prepared by the Prudential Assurance Company.
The RAF, under the command of “Bomber” Harris, carried out Lewin’s
plans, culminating in the terror firestorm bombing of Dresden, in
which over 125,000, mainly old men, women and children, were killed.
The truth of “Bomber” Harris’s horror raids on German civilians was
a well kept secret until long after the end of WW II.
Tavistock provided most of the detailed programs that led to he establishing of the Office of Naval Intelligence, (ONI) the
number one intelligence service in the United States, one which
wharfs the CIA in size and scope. Contracts worth billions of
dollars were given to Tavistock by the United States Government
and Tavistock’s strategic planners provide most of what the Pentagon uses for our defense establishment, even today. Here
again is illustrated the grip the Committee of 300 has on the
United States, and the majority of our institutions. Tavistock
runs over 30 research institutions in the United States, all of
which we will name in our charts at the end of the book.
These Tavistock-U.S. institutions have in many cases grown into
gargantuan monsters, penetrating every aspect of our government
agencies and taking command of all policy making. One of Tavistock’s
chief wreckers of our way of life was Dr. Alexander King, a founder
member of NATO and a favorite with the Committee of 300, as well as
an outstanding member of the Club of Rome. Dr. King was assigned by
the Club of Rome to destroy America’s education by taking control of
the National Teachers Association and working in close conjunction
with certain law makers and judges. If it was not generally known
how all-pervading is the influence of the Committee of 300, this
book should dispel every vestige of that doubt.
The trial run for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
a Club of Rome creation came in a test run against the nuclear power
station at Three Mile Island, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Termed “an
accident” by the hysterical media, this was not an accident but a
deliberately designed crisis test for FEMA. An additional benefit
was the fear and hysteria created by the news media which had people
fleeing the area when in fact they were never in any danger.
It was considered a success by FEMA and it scored a lot of points
for the anti-nuclear forces. TMI became the rallying point for the
so-called “environmentalists,” a highly financed and controlled
group run out of Aspen Institute on behalf of the Club of Rome.
Coverage was provided free of charge by William Paley of CBS
television, a former British intelligence agent.
FEMA is a natural successor to the Strategic Bombing Survey
of WW II. Dr. Kurt Lewin, theoretician for what the Tavistock
conspirators called crisis management, was deeply involved in
the study. There is an unbroken chain between Lewin and
Tavistock that stretches back for thirty-seven years. Lewin incorporated the Strategic Bombing Survey into
FEMA, with only
a few small adjustments proving necessary, one of the changes
being the target, WHICH WAS NO LONGER GERMANY BUT THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA. Forty-five years after the end of WW II it is still
Tavistock that has its hands on the trigger, and the weapon is
pointed at the United States.
The late Margaret Mead conducted an intensive study of the German
and Japanese population, under the aegis of Tavistock, on how they
reacted to stress caused by aerial bombardment. Irving Janus was an
associate professor on the project which was supervised by Dr. John
Rawlings Reese, promoted to Brigadier-General in the British Army.
The test results were given to FEMA. The Irving Janus report was of
great value in formulating FEMA policies. Janus used it in a book
which he later wrote entitled AIR WAR AND STRESS. The ideas in his
book were followed TO THE LETTER BY FEMA DURING THE THREE MILE
ISLAND “CRISIS.” Janus had a really simple idea: Simulate a
succession of crises and manipulate the population following the
Lewin terror tactics and they will do exactly as required.
In carrying out this exercise, Lewin discovered something new, that
social control on a wide scale can be achieved by using the news
media to bring home the horrors of a nuclear war via the television
media. It was discovered that women’s magazines were very effective
in dramatizing the terrors of a nuclear war. A trial run conducted
by Janus had Betty Bumpers, wife of Senator Dale Bumpers of
Arkansas, “writing” for McCalls magazine on that subject.
The article appeared in McCalls January 1983 issue. Actually,
Mrs.
Bumpers did not write the article, it was created for her by a group
of writers at Tavistock whose speciality such subject matters are.
It was a collection of untruths, non-facts, innuendoes and
conjectures based entirely upon false premises. The Bumpers article
was typical of the kind of psychological manipulation at which
Tavistock is so very good. Not one of the ladies who read McCalls
could have failed to be impressed by the terror-horror story of what
a nuclear war looks like.
The Committee of 300 has a major bureaucracy at its disposal made
up of hundreds of think tanks and front organizations that run the
whole gamut of private business and government leaders. I will
mention as many as I can fit in, starting with the German Marshall
Fund. Its members, and remember they are also members of NATO and
the Club of Rome, consist of,
-
David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan
Bank
-
Gabriel Hague of the prestigious
Manufactures Hanover Trust and Finance Corporation
-
Milton Katz of the Ford Foundation
-
Willy Brandt, leader of
Socialist International, KGB agent and member of the Committee of 300
-
Irving Bluestone, chairman of the United Auto
Workers Executive Board
-
Russell Train, U.S. president of the Club
of Rome and Prince Philip’s World Wildlife Fund
-
Elizabeth Midgely,
CBS programs producer
-
B. R. Gifford, director of the Russell Sage
Foundation
-
Guido Goldman of the Aspen Institute the late Averill
Harriman, Committee of 300 extraordinary member
-
Thomas L. Hughes of
the Carnegie Endowment Fund
-
Dennis Meadows and Jay Forrestor of MIT
“world dynamics”
The Committee of 300, although in existence for over 150 years, did
not take on its present form until around 1897. It was always given
to issuing orders through other fronts, such as the Royal Institute
for International Affairs. When it was decided that a super-body
would control European affairs, the RIIA founded the
Tavistock
Institute, which in turn created NATO. For Five years
NATO was
financed by the German Marshall Fund. Perhaps the most important
member of
the Bilderbergers, a foreign policy body of the Committee,
was Joseph Rettinger, said to have been its founder and organizer,
whose annual meetings have delighted conspiracy hunters for several
decades.
Rettinger was a well-trained Jesuit priest and a 33rd Degree
Freemason. Mrs. Katherine Meyer Graham who is suspected of
having murdered her husband in order to get control of the
Washington Post, was another ranking member of the Club of
Rome, as was Paul G. Hoffman of the New York Life Insurance
Company, one of the largest insurance companies in the United
States and a leading Rank company, with ties directly to Queen
Elizabeth of England’s immediate family. John J. McCloy, the man who
attempted to wipe post-World War II Germany off the map and last but
not least, James A. Perkins of the Carnegie Corporation, were also
founding members of the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome.
What a star-studded cast! Yet strangely enough, few if any outside
of genuine intelligence agencies had ever heard of this organization
until recent times. The power exercised by these important
personages and the corporations, television stations newspapers,
insurance companies and banks they represent matches the power and
prestige of at least two European countries, and still this is only
the tip of The Committee of 300’s enormous crossgridding and
interfaced interests.
Not mentioned in the foregoing line-up is Richard Gardner who,
although an early member of the Committee of 300, was sent to Rome
on a special assignment. Gardner married into one of the
oldest
Black Nobility families of Venice, thus providing the Venetian
aristocracy a direct line to the White House. The late Averill
Harriman was another of the committee’s direct links with the
Kremlin and the White House, a position which
Kissinger inherited
after the death of Harriman.
The Club of Rome is indeed a formidable agency of the
Committee of
300. Although ostensibly working on American affairs, the group
overlaps other Committee of 300 agencies and its United States
members are often found working with “problems” in Japan and
Germany. Some of the front organizations operated by the above
committee include the following, although not limited to them:
-
LEAGUE OF INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY
Officials: Michael Novak, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Eugene Rostow, IRWIN
SUALL, Lane Kirkland, Albert Schenker. Purpose: To disrupt and
disturb normal labor relations between workers and employees by brain washing labor unions to make impossible demands with special attention to steel, auto-mobile
and housing industries.
-
FREEDOM HOUSE Officials: Leo Churn and Carl Gershman.
Purpose: To spread socialist disinformation among American blue collar workers, spread dissension and dissatisfaction. Now
that these objectives have been largely realized, Gershman has been
drafted by Lawrence Eagleburger to CEDC, a newly created body to
stop a united Germany from expanding its trade into the Danube
Basin.
-
COMMITTEE FOR A DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY
Officials: Ben Wattenburg, Jean Kirkpatrick, Elmo Zumwa and Midge
Dector. Purpose: To provide a connecting link between the
educated
socialist class and minority groups with the intent of setting up a
solid block of voters who can be counted on to vote for leftwing
candidates at election time. It was really a Fabianist operation
from start to finish.
-
FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Officials: Robert Strausz Hupe. Purpose: To undermine and eventually end NASA space
program.
-
SOCIAL DEMOCRATS U.S.A. Officials: Bayard Rustin, Lane Kirkland, Jay Lovestone, Carl
Gershman, Howard Samuel, Sidney Hook. Purpose: To spread radical socialism, especially among minority
groups, and forge links between similar organizations in socialist
countries. Lovestone was for decades the leading advisor to U.S.
presidents on Soviet affairs and a strong direct link with Moscow.
-
INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RELATIONS
Officials: Harland Cleveland, Willis Harmon.
Purpose: Change the way America thinks.
-
THE CITIZENS LEAGUE Officials: Barry Commoner.
Purpose: To bring “common cause” legal suits against various government agencies, especially in the defense industries.
-
WAR RESISTERS LEAGUE Officials: Noam Chomsky and David McReynolds.
Purpose: To organize resistance to the Vietnam War among
leftwing groups, students and the Hollywood “in crowd.”
-
THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST ORGANIZING
COMMITTEE OF THE INSTITUTE FOR
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM Officials: Frank Zeider, Arthur Redier and David McReynolds.
Purpose: A clearing house for leftwing socialist ideas and
activities in the U.S and Europe.
-
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FACT FINDING
DIVISION Officials: IRWIN SUALL, also known as John Graham.
Purpose: A joint FBI-British intelligence operation designed
to single out rightwing groups and their leaders and put them out of
business before they grow too large and too influential.
-
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS
Purpose: A labor oriented front for the Socialist
International and a hot-bed of organized labor unrest polarizing
workers and
management.
-
AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS
Officials: Murray Findley, IRWIN SUALL and Jacob Scheinkman.
Purpose: Much the same as the Machinists Union, to
socialize and
polarize workers in the garment trade.
-
A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE
Officials: Bayard Rustin. Purpose: To provide a means of coordinating organizations
with a common purpose, an example of which would be the spread of
socialist ideas among college students and workers.
-
CAMBRIDGE POLICY STUDIES INSTITUTE
Officials: Gar Apelrovitz. Purpose: To expand on the work being done at the Institute
for Policy Studies. Founded in February 1969 by international
socialist, Gar Apelrovitz, former assistant to Senator Gaylord
Nelson. Apelrovitz wrote the controversial book ATOMIC DIPLOMACY
for the Club of Rome which work was financed by the German Marshall
Fund. It concentrates on research and action projects, with a stated
goal of fundamentally changing American society, i.e., to create a
Fabianist United States in preparation of the coming One World
Government.
-
ECONOMIC COMMITTEE OF THE NORTH
ATLANTIC INSTITUTE Officials: Dr. Aurellio Peccei.
Purpose: NATO think-tank on global economic issues.
-
CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF DEMOCRATIC
INSTITUTIONS Officials: Founder Robert Hutchins of the Committee of 300, Harry Ashmore, Frank Kelly and a large group of “Fellows.”
Purpose: To spread ideas that will bring on social reforms
of the liberal kind with democracy as an ideology. One of its
activities is to draft a new constitution for the U.S. which will be
strongly monarchical and socialistic as found in Denmark.
The Center is an “Olympian” stronghold. Located in Santa Barbara, it
is housed in what is affectionately called “the Parthenon.” Former
Representative John Rarick called it “an outfit loaded with
Communists.” By 1973 work on a new United States Constitution was in
its thirty-fifth draft which proposes an amendment guaranteeing
“environmental right,” the thrust of which is to reduce the
industrial base of the U.S. to a mere whisper of what it was in
1969. In other words, this institution is carrying out Club of Rome
zero-growth post-industrial policies laid down by the Committee of
300.
Some of its other aims are control of economic cycles, welfare,
regulation of business and national public works, con-trol of
pollution. Speaking on behalf of the Committee of 300, Ashmore says
the function of the CSDI is to find ways and means of making our
political system work more effectively. “We must change education
and we must consider a new U.S Constitution and a Constitution for
the world,” Ashmore says.
Further goals enunciated by Ashmore are as follows:
(1) Membership of the U.N. must be made universal.
(2) The U.N. must be strengthened. (3)
South East Asia must be neutralized. (For neutralized, read
“Communized.”) (4) Cold War must be ended.
(5) Racial discrimination must be abolished.
(6) Developing nations must be assisted. (Meaning assisted to
destruct.) (7) No military solutions to problems. (Pity they didn’t tell George
Bush that before the Gulf War.) (8) National solutions are not adequate.
(9) Coexistence is necessary.
-
HARVARD PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINIC
Officials: Dr. Kurt Lewin and staff of 15 new-science scientists.
Purpose: To create a climate where the Committee of 300 can take
unlimited power over the U.S.
-
INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH
Officials: Dr. Kurt Lewin and staff of 20 new-science scientists.
Purpose: To devise a whole new set of social programs to steer
America away from industry.
-
SCIENCE POLICY RESEARCH UNIT
Officials: Leland Bradford, Kenneth Dam, Ronald Lippert.
Purpose: A “Future Shocks” research institution at Sussex
University in England and part of the Tavistock network.
-
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Officials: Sheldon Arenberg and a staff of hundreds, too numerous to
mention here. Purpose: To coordinate all elements of the intelligence
communities of the U.S.A. and Britain. It analyzes what “players” have to be assigned the role of a national entity; for example,
Spain would come under a supine watered-down Catholic
Church, the U.N. under the Secretary General and so forth. It
developed the system of “X RAY 2” where think tank personnel,
military installations and law enforcement centers are all linked
to the Pentagon through a nation-wide network of Teletypes and
computers: To apply surveillance techniques on a nation-wide
scale. Arenberg says his ideas are non-military, but his techniques
are mainly those he learned from the military. He was responsible
for the New York State Identification and Intelligence System, a
typical George Orwell “1984” project, which is completely
illegal under our Constitution. The NYSIIS system is in the
process of being adopted nationwide. It is what Brzezinsk
referred to as the ability to almost instantaneously retrieve data
about any person.
NYSIIS shares data with all law enforcement and govern-ment agencies
in the state. It provides storage and rapid retrieval of individual
records, criminal and social. It is a TYPICAL Committee of 300
project. There is a crying need for a full investigation to be
conducted into just what it is that Systems Development Corporation
is doing, but that is beyond the scope of this book. One thing is
sure, SDC is not there to preserve freedom and liberty guaranteed by
the U.S. Constitution. How convenient that it should be located in
Santa Barbara in easy reach of Robert Hutchins “Parthenon.” Some
publications put out by these Club of Rome institutions are as
follows:
“Center Magazine” “Counterspy” “Coventry” “Covert Action Information Bulletin” “Dissent” “Human Relations” “Industrial Research” “Inquiry” “Mother Jones” “One” “Progressive” “Raconteur” “The New Republic” “Working Papers for a New Society”
These are by no means all of the publications issued under the
auspices of the Club of Rome. There are many hundreds more, in fact
each of the foundations puts out its own publication. Given the
number of foundations run by the Tavistock Institute and the
Club of
Rome, a partial listing is all we can include here. Some of the more
important foundations and think tanks are in the following list,
which includes Army think tanks.
The American public would be astounded if it only knew
how deeply the Army is involved in “new war tactics” research with
Committee of 300 “think tanks.” Americans are not aware that in 1946
the Club of Rome was ordered by the Committee of 300 to further the
progress of think tanks which it said offered a new means of
spreading the Committee’s philosophy. The impact of these think
tanks upon our military, just since 1959 when they suddenly
proliferated, is truly astounding. There is no doubt that they will
play an even greater role in the daily affairs of this nation as we
come to the close of the 20th century.
-
THE MONT PELERIN SOCIETY Mont Pelerin is an economic foundation devoted to issuing misleading
economic theories and influencing economists in the Western world to
follow models it lays out from time to time. Its leading
practitioners are Von Hayek and Milton Friedman.
-
THE HOOVER INSTITUTION Founded originally to fight Communism, the institution has slowly
but surely turned toward Socialism. It has an annual budget of $2
million, funded by companies under the umbrella of the Committee of
300. It now concentrates on “peaceful changes” with emphasis on arms
control and domestic U.S. problems. It is Frequently used by the
news media as a “conser-vative” organization whose views they seek
when a conservative viewpoint is needed. The Hoover Institution is
far from that, and following the 1953 take-over of the Institution
by a group allied to the Club of Rome, it has become a One World-New
World Order outlet for “desirable” policies.
-
HERITAGE FOUNDATION Founded by brewery magnate Joseph Coors to act as a
conservative think tank, Heritage was soon taken over by Fabianists
Sir Peter Vickers Hall, Stuart Butler, Steven Ayzlei,
Robert Moss and Frederich Von Hayek under the direction of
the Club of Rome. This institute played a major role in carrying
out British Labour leader Anthony Wedgewood Benn’s order to
“Thatcherize Reagan.” Heritage is certainly not a conservative
operation although at times it may look and sound like one.
-
HUMAN RESOURCES RESEARCH OFFICE. This is an Army research establishment dealing in
“psychotechnology.” Most of its personnel are Tavistock-trained.
“Psychotechnology” covers GI motivation, morale and music used by
the enemy. In fact a lot of what George Orwell wrote about in his
book “1984” appears to be remarkably similar to what is taught at
HUMRRO. In 1969, the Committee of 300 took over this important
institution and turned it into a private non-profit organization run
under the auspices of the Club of Rome. It is the largest behavioral
research group in the U.S.
One of its specialties is the study of small groups under stress
and HUMRRO teaches the Army that a soldier is merely an extension of
his equipment and has brought great influence to bear on the
“man/weapon” system and its “human quality control,” so widely
accepted by the United States Army. HUMRRO has had a very pronounced
effect on how the Army conducts itself. Its mind-bending techniques
are straight out of Tavistock. HUMRRO’S applied psychology courses
are sup-posed to teach Army brass how to make the human weapon work.
A good example of this is the manner in which soldiers in the war
against Iraq were willing to disobey their field manual standing
orders and bury 12,000 Iraqi soldiers alive.
This type of brainwashing is terribly dangerous because
today, it is applied to the Army, the Army applies it to brutally
destroy thousands of “enemy” soldiers, and tomorrow the Army
could be told that civilian population groups opposed to government policies are “the enemy.” We are already a mindless
brainwashed flock of sheep, yet it seems that HUMRRO can
take mind bending and mind control a step further. HUMRRO is
a valuable adjunct to Tavistock and many of the lessons taught
at HUMRRO were applied in the Gulf War, which makes it a
little easier to understand how it came to be that American soldiers
behaved as ruthless and heartless killers, a far cry from the
concept of the traditional American fighting man.
-
RESEARCH ANALYSlS CORPORATION. This is
HUMRRO’S sister “1984” organization situated in McLean,
Virginia. Established in 1948, it was taken over by the Committee of
300 in 1961 when it became part of the Johns Hopkins bloc. It has
worked on over 600 projects, including integrating Negroes into the
Army, the tactical use of nuclear weapons, psychological warfare
programs and mass population control.
Obviously there are many more major think tanks, and we shall come
to most of them in this book. One of the most important areas of
cooperation between what think tanks turn out and what becomes
government and public policy are the “pollsters.” It is the job of
the polling companies to mold and shape public opinion in the way
that suits the conspirators. Polls are constantly being taken by
CBS-NBC-ABC, the New York Times, the Washington Post. Most of these
efforts are coordinated at the National Opinion Research Center
where, as much as it will amaze most of us, a psychological profile
was developed for the entire nation.
Findings are fed into the computers of Gallup Poll and Yankelovich,
Skelley and White for comparative evaluation. Much of what we read
in our newspapers or see on television has first been cleared by the
polling companies. WHAT WE SEE IS WHAT THE POLLSTERS THINK WE SHOULD
SEE.
This is called “public opinion making.” The whole idea behind
this bit of social conditioning is to find out how responsive the
public is to POLICY DIRECTIVES handed down by the Committee of 300. We are called “targeted population groups” and
what is measured by the pollsters is how much resistance is
generated to what appears in the “Nightly News.” Later, we
shall learn exactly how this deceptive practice got started and
who is responsible for it.
It is all part of the elaborate opinion-making process created at,
Tavistock. Today our people believe they are well-informed but what
they do not realize is that the opinions they believe are their own
were in fact created in the research institutions and think tanks of
America and that none of us are free to form our own opinions
because of the information we are provided with by the media and the
pollsters.
Polling was brought to a fine art just before the United States
entered the Second World War. Americans, unbeknown to themselves,
were conditioned to look upon Germany and Japan as dangerous enemies
who had to be stopped. In a sense, this was true, and that makes
conditioned thinking all the more dangerous, because based on the
INFORMATlON fed to them, the enemy did indeed appear to be Germany
and Japan. Just recently we saw how well Tavistock’s conditioning
process works when Americans were conditioned to perceive Iraq as a
threat and Saddam Hussein as a personal enemy of the United States.
Such a conditioning process is technically described as “the message
reaching the sense organs of persons to be influenced.” One of the
most respected of all pollsters is Committee of 300 member Daniel Yankelovich, of the company,
Yankelovich, Skelley and White. Yankelovich is proud to tell his students that polling is a tool to
change public opinion, although this is not original, Yankelovich
having drawn his inspiration from David Naisbett’s book “TREND
REPORT” which was commissioned by the Club of Rome.
In his book Naisbett describes all of the techniques used by
public opinion makers to bring about the public opinion desired
by the Committee of 300. Public opinion making is the jewel in the
crown of the OLYMPIANS, for with their thousands of new-science social scientists at their beck and call, and with the news
media firmly in their hands, NEW public opinions on almost
any subject can be created and disseminated around the world in
a matter of two weeks.
This is precisely what happened when their servant George Bush
was
ordered to make war on Iraq. Within two weeks, not only the U.S. but
almost the entire world public opinion was turned against Iraq and
its President Saddam Hussein.
These media change artists and news
manipulators report directly to the Club of Rome which in turn
reports to the Committee of 300 at whose head sits the Queen of
England ruling over a vast network of closely-linked corporations
who never pay taxes and are answerable to no one, who fund their
research institutions through foundations whose joint activities
have almost total control over our daily lives.
Together with their interlocking companies, insurance business,
banks, finance corporations, oil companies, newspapers, magazines,
radio and television, this vast apparatus sits astride the United
States and the world. There is not a politician in Washington D.C.
who is not, somehow, beholden to it. The Left rails against it,
calling it “imperialism” which indeed it is, but the left is run by
the same people, the very same ones who control the right, so that
the left is no more free than we are!
Scientists engaged in the process of conditioning are called “social
engineers” or “new-science social scientists” and they play an
integral part in what we see, hear and read. The “old school” social
engineers were Kurt K. Lewin, Professor Hadley Cantril,
Margaret
Meade, Professor Derwin Cartwright and Professor Lipssitt who,
together with John Rawlings Reese, made up the backbone of
new-science scientists at Tavistock Institute.
During the Second World War, there were over 100 re-searchers at
work under the direction of Kurt Lewin, copying slavishly the
methods adopted by Reinhard Heydrich of the S.S.
The OSS was based on Heydrich’s methodology and, as we
know, the OSS was the forerunner of the Central Intelligence
Agency. The point of all this is that the governments of Britain
and the United States already have the machinery in place to
bring us into line in a New World Order with only a slight modicum
of resistance materializing, and this machinery has been in place
since 1946. Each passing year has added new refinements.
It is this Committee of 300 which has established control networks
and mechanisms far more binding than anything ever seen in this
world. Chains and ropes are not needed to restrain us. Our fear of
what is to come does that job far more efficiently than any physical
means of restraint. We have been brainwashed to give up our
Constitutional right to bear arms; to give up our Constitution
itself; to allow the United Nations to exercise control over our
foreign policies and the IMF to take control of our fiscal and
monetary policies; to permit the President to break United States
law with impunity and to invade a foreign country and kidnap its
head-of-state. In short we have been brainwashed to the extent where
we, as a nation, will accept each and every lawless act carried out
by our government almost without question.
I for one know that we will soon have to fight to reclaim our
country from the Committee, or lose it forever. BUT when it comes
right down to it, how many will actually take up arms? In 1776 only
3% of the populace took up arms against King George III. This time
around, 3% will be woefully inadequate. We should not allow
ourselves to be led down dead-end roads, for that is what our mind
controllers have planned for us by confronting us with such a
complexity of issues that we simply succumb to long range
penetration and make no decisions at all on many vital issues.
We shall be looking at the names of those who make up the
Committee of 300 but, before we do that, we should examine
the massive interfacing of all important institutions, companies
and banks under the Committee’s control. We must mark them
well because these are the people who are deciding who shall
live and who shall be eliminated as “useless eaters”; where we
will worship God, what we must wear and even what we shall
eat. According to Brzezinski, we shall be under endless
surveillance around the clock for 365 days a year ad infinitum.
That we have been betrayed from within is being accepted by more and
more people each year, and that is good, because it is through
knowledge, a word translated from the word BELIEF, that we shall be
able to defeat the enemies of all mankind. While we were being
distracted by the bogeymen in the Kremlin, the Trojan Horse was
moved into position in Washington D.C. The greatest danger free
people face today is not from Moscow but from Washington D.C. We
need first to conquer the DOMESTIC ENEMY, and after that we will be
strong enough to mount an offensive to remove Communism from the
earth together with all of its attendant “isms.”
The Carter Administration accelerated the collapse of our economy
and our military strength, the latter begun by Club of Rome and
Lucis Trust member Robert Strange McNamara. In spite of his
promises, Reagan continued to undermine our industrial base,
starting where Carter left off. While we need to keep our defenses
strong, we cannot do that from a weak industrial base for, without
a well-run military-industrial complex, we cannot have a viable
defense system. The Committee of 300 recognizes this and planned
from 1953 its zero-growth post-industrial policies now in full
flower.
Thanks to the Club of Rome our technology potential has
dropped below that of Japan and Germany, nations we are
supposed to have defeated in the Second World War. How has
this come about? Because of men like Dr. Alexander King and
our blindfolded state of mind, we have failed to recognize the
destruction of our educational institutions and systems of
teaching. As a result of our blindness, we are no longer training
engineers and scientist in sufficient numbers to keep us among
the industrialized nations of the world. Thanks to Dr. King, a
man very few people in America know about, education in the
U.S. is at its lowest level since 1786. Statistics produced by the
Institute for Higher Learning show that the reading and writing
capabilities of high school children the United States are LOWER
than they were among high school children in 1786.
What we face today is not only the loss of our freedom and the very
fabric of our nation, but far worse, the possibility of the loss of
our souls. The steady chipping away at the foundation upon which
this republic rests has left an empty void, which satanists and
cultists are rushing to fill with their synthetic soul material.
This truth is difficult to accept and appreciate because there was
nothing SUDDEN about these events. If a sudden shock were to hit us,
a cultural and religious shock, we would be shaken out of our
apathy.
But gradualism—which is what Fabianism is, does nothing to raise the
alarm. Because the vast majority of Americans can see no MOTIVATION
for the things I have described, they cannot accept it, and so the
conspiracy is scorned and often mocked. By creating chaos through
presenting hundreds of daily choices our people have to make, we
have come down to a position where, unless motivation can be clearly
shown, all information is rejected.
This is both the weak and the strong link in the conspiratorial
chain. Most thrust aside anything that has no motive, so the
conspirators feel safe behind the ridicule poured upon those who
point to the coming crisis in our nation and our individual lives.
However, if we can get enough people to see the truth, the
motivation block gets weaker until it will eventually be forced
aside as more and more people become enlightened and the notion that
“this cannot happen in America” is dispensed with.
The Committee of 300 is counting on our maladaptive responses to govern our reaction to created events, and it will not
be disappointed as long as we as a nation continue in the present
way we respond. We must turn responses to created crises into
ADAPTIVE responses by identifying the conspirators and exposing their plans for us, so that these things become public
knowledge. The Club of Rome has already made THE TRANSITION TO BARBARISM. Instead of waiting to be “raptured,”
we must stop the Committee of 300 before it can accomplish its goal
of making us prisoners of the” New Dark Age” planned for us. It is
not up to God, IT IS UP TO US. We have to take the necessary action.
All information that I provide in this book comes from years of
research backed up by impeccable intelligence sources. Nothing is
exaggerated. It is factual and precise so do not fall into the trap
set by the enemy that this material is “disinformation.” For the
past two decades I have provided information which has proved to be
highly accurate and which has explained a lot of puzzling events. My
hope is that through this book, a better, clearer and wider
understanding of the conspiratorial forces ranged against this
nation will come about. That hope is being realized as more and more
young people are beginning to ask questions and seek information
about what is REALLY going on.
It is difficult for people to comprehend that these conspirators
are real and that they have the power I and many others have
attributed to them. Many have written to ask how it is that our
government does nothing about the terrible threat to civilization?
The problem is that our government is PART of the problem, part of
the conspiracy, and nowhere and at no time has this become more
clearly evident than during the Bush Presidency. Of course
President Bush knows precisely what the Committee of 300 is doing to
us. HE WORKS FOR THEM. Others have written to say, “We thought we
were fighting the government.” Of course we are, but behind
government stands a force so powerful and all-encompassing that
intelligence agencies are even afraid to mention the name
“Olympians.”
Proof of the Committee of 300 is found in the vast number of
powerful institutions owned and controlled by it. Listed here are
some of the more important ones, all of which come under the MOTHER
OF ALL THINK TANKS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS, THE TAVISTOCK
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS with its far-flung network of hundreds
of “branches.”
STANFORD RESEARCH CENTER
Stanford Research Center (SRC) was founded in 1946 by the
Tavistock
Institute For Human Relations. Stanford was created to help Robert
0. Anderson and his ARCO oil company, who had secured for the
Committee of 300 the oil rights on the North Slope of Alaska.
Basically, the job was too large for Anderson’s Aspen Institute to
handle, so a new center had to be founded and funded. That new
center was Stanford Research Center. Alaska sold its rights on a downpayment of $900 million, a relatively small amount for the
Committee of 300. The governor of Alaska was steered to SRI for help
and advice. This was no accident but the result of judicious
planning and a process of long-range conditioning.
Following the governor’s call for help, three SRI scientists set up
shop in Alaska where they met with the Alaskan Secretary of State
and the State Planning Office. Francis Greehan, who headed the SRI
team, assured the Governor that his problem of how to handle the
rich oil find would be safe in the hands of SRI. Naturally Greehan
did not mention the Committee of 300 or the Club of Rome. In less
than a month Greehan assembled a team of economists, petroleum
scientists and new-science scientists numbering in the hundreds.
The report SRI gave to the Governor ran to eighty-eight pages.
The proposal was adopted virtually without change by the Alaska
legislature in 1970. Greehan had indeed done a remark-able job for
the Committee of 300. From this beginning SRI developed into an
institution employing 4000 people with an annual budget of $160
million plus. Its President, Charles A.
Anderson, has seen much of this growth during his tenure, as
has Professor Willis Harmon, director of the SRI Center for the
Study of Social Policies, employing hundreds of new-science
scientists, many of the top staffers having been transferred from Tavistock’s London base. One of those was RCA board chairman and former British intelligence agent,
David Sarnoff, who
was closely involved with Harmon and his team for twenty-five
years. Sarnoff was something of a “watchdog” for the mother
institute in Sussex.
Stanford claims to make no moral judgments on projects it accepts,
working for Israel and the Arabs, South Africa and Libya but, as one
would imagine, by adopting this attitude it ensures an “inside edge”
with foreign governments that the CIA has found most useful. In
Jim
Ridgeway’s book, “THE CLOSED CORPORATION,” SRI spokesman Gibson
brags about SRI’s non-discriminatory stance. Although not on the
Federal Contract Research Center lists, SRI is today the largest
military think tank, dwarfing Hudson and Rand. Among SRl’s specialty departments are chemical and biological warfare
experimental centers.
One of Stanford’s more dangerous activities is counter-insurgency
operations aimed at civilian populations—just the sort of “1984”
things government is already using against its own people. The U.S.
government pays SRI millions of dollars each year for this kind of
highly controversial “research.” Following student protests against
chemical warfare experiments conducted at Stanford, SRI “sold”
itself to a private group for just $25 million. Of course nothing
really changed, SRI was still a Tavistock project and the
Committee
of 300 still owned it, but the gullible appeared to be satisfied by
this meaningless cosmetic change.
In 1958 a startling new development arose. Advanced Re-search
Products Agency (ARPA), a contracting agency for the
Defense Department, approached SRI with a top secret
proposal. John Foster
at the Pentagon told SRI that what was needed was a program to
insure the United States against “technological surprise.” Foster
wanted to perfect a condition where the environment became a weapon;
special bombs to trigger volcanos and/or earthquakes, behavioral
research on potential enemies and minerals and metals with potential
for new weapons. The project was accepted by SRI and code-named
“SHAKY.”
The massive electronic brain in SHAKY was capable of carrying out
many commands, its computers having been constructed
by IBM for SRI. Twenty-eight scientists worked on what is called
“Human Augmentation.” The IBM computer even has the capability to
solve problems by analogy and recognizes and identifies scientists
who work with it. The “special applications” of this tool can be
better imagined than described. Brzezinski knew what he was talking
about when he wrote “THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA.”
Stanford Research Institute works closely with scores of civilian
consulting firms, trying to apply military technology to domestic
situations. This has not always been a success, but as techniques
improve, the prospects for massive all-pervading surveillance, as
described by Brzezinski, daily becomes more real. IT ALREADY EXISTS
AND IS IN USE, EVEN THOUGH SLIGHT MALFUNCTIONS FROM TIME TO TIME
HAVE TO BE IRONED OUT. One such civilian consulting firm was
Schriever McKee Associates of McLean, Virginia, run by retired
General Bernard A. Schriever, a former chief of the Air Force
Systems Command, who developed the Titan, Thor, Atlas and Minuteman
rockets.
Schriever put together a consortium of Lockheed, Emmerson Electric,
Northrop, Control Data, Raytheon and TRW under the name of URBAN
SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC. The purpose of the consortium? To solve
social and psychological “urban problems” by means of military
techniques using advanced electronic systems. It is interesting to
note that TRW became the largest credit information collecting
company in the credit-reporting business as a result and an outcome
of its work with Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
This should tell us a great deal about just how far this nation is
already under TOTAL SURVEILLANCE, which is the first requirement of
the Committee of 300. No dictatorship, especially not one on a
global scale, can function without total control over each and every
individual. SRI was well on its way to becoming a key Committee of
300 research organization.
By the 1980’s, 60% of SRl’s contracts were devoted to
“Futurism” with both military and civilian applications. Its major clients
were the,
-
U.S. Department of Defense-Directorate of Defense Research
and Engineering
-
Office of Aerospace Re-search which dealt with
“Applications of the Behavioral Sciences to Research Management”
-
Executive Office of the President
-
Office of Science and Technology
-
U.S. Department of Health
On behalf of the Department of Health,
SRI ran a program called “’Patterns in ESDEA Title I Reading
Achievement Tests.” Other clients were the,
-
U.S. Department of
Energy
-
U.S. Department of Labor
-
U.S. Department of
Transportation
-
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Of
significance was the paper developed for NSF, entitled “Assessment
of Future and International Problems.”
Stanford Research, under the tutelage of Tavistock Institute in
London, put together a far reaching and chilling system it called
“Business Intelligence Program.” In excess of 600 companies in the
U.S. and abroad became subscribers. The program covered research in,
-
Japanese Foreign Business Relations
-
Consumer Marketing in a Period
of Change
-
The Mounting Challenge of International Terrorism
-
Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Products
-
Electronic Funds Transfer
System
-
Opto-Electric Sensing
-
Exploratory Planning Methods
-
U.S. Defense Industry and Capital Availability
Among the TOP
Committee of 300 companies who became clients of this program were,
But one of the most sinister of all SRI programs with the
possibilities of doing tremendous damage in altering the direction in which the United States will go, socially, morally and
religiously, was Stanford’s Charles F. Kettering Foundation’s
“CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN” under Stanford official
reference “Contract Number URH (489)-2150 Policy Research
Report Number 4/4/74, Prepared by the SRI Center for the Study of
Social Policy, Director Willis Harmon.” This is probably one of the
most far-reaching investigations into how man might be changed that
has ever been conducted.
The report, covering 319 pages, was written by 14 new science
scientists under the supervision of Tavistock and 23 top controllers
including B. F. Skinner, Margaret Meade, Ervin Lazlo and
Sir Geoffrey Vickers, a high-level British intelligence officer in M16.
It will be recalled that his son-in-law, Sir Peter Vickers Hall, was
a founding member of the so-called conservative “Heritage
Foundation.” Much of the 3000 pages of “recommendations” given to
the Reagan administration in January 1981 were based upon material
taken from Willis Harmon’s “CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN.”
I was privileged to receive a copy of “THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN”
from my intelligence colleagues five days after it was accepted by
the United States government. What I read shocked me, as I realized
I was looking at a blueprint for a future America, unlike anything I
had ever seen before. The nation was to be programmed to change and
become so accustomed to such planned changes that it would hardly
be noticeable when profound changes did occur. We have gone downhill
so fast since “THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY” (the book title of
Willis
Harmon’s technical paper) was written, that today, divorce draws no
stigma, suicide is at an all time high and raises few eyebrows,
social deviations from the norm and sexual aberrations, once
unmentionable in decent circles, are now commonplace and excite no
special protest.
As a nation we have not noticed how “CHANGING IMAGES
OF MANKIND” has radically altered our American way of life
forever. Somehow we were overcome by the “Watergate Syndrome.” For a while we were shocked and dismayed to learn
that Nixon was nothing but a cheap crook who hobnobbed with
Earl Warren’s Mafia friends at the beautiful home they built for
him adjoining the Nixon estate. When too many “future shocks”
and news headlines demanded our attention, we lost our way, or
rather, the huge number of choices with which we were and still are
daily confronted, confused us to such a degree that we were no
longer able to make the necessary choices.
Worse yet, having been subjected to a barrage of crimes in high
places, plus the trauma of the Vietnam War, our nation seemed no
longer to want truths. Such reaction is carefully explained in
Willis Harmon’s technical paper, in short, the American nation was
reacting exactly as profiled. Worse yet, in not wishing to accept
truth, we took matters a step further: We looked to government to
shield us from the truth.
The corrupt stench of the Reagan-Bush Administrations we wanted
covered with six feet of earth. The crimes committed under the title
of Iran/Contra affair (or scandals), we didn’t want uncovered. We
let our President lie to us regarding his where abouts in the period
October 20-23rd, 1980. Yet these crimes far exceed in quantity and
scope anything Nixon did while he was in office. Do we as a nation
recognize it as going downhill with our brakes off?
No, we do not. When those whose business it is to bring the truth to
the American people that a private, well-organized little government
inside the White House was busy committing one crime after another,
crimes which attacked the very soul of this nation and the
republican institutions upon which it rested, we were told not to
bother the public with such things. “We really don’t want to know
about all this speculation,” became a standard response.
When the highest elected official of the land blatantly put U.N. law
above the Constitution of the United States—an impeachable offense,
the majority accepted it as “normal.” When the highest elected
official of the land went to war without a Congressional declaration
of war, the fact was censored out by the news media and, again, we
accepted it rather than face the truth.
When the Gulf War, which our President plotted and planned,
began, not only were we happy with censorship of the most
blatant kind, we even took it to our hearts, believing that it was
“good to the war effort.” Our President lied, April Glaspie lied,
the State Department lied. They said the war was justified because
President Hussein had been warned to leave Kuwait alone. When
Glaspie’s cables to the State Department were finally made public,
one United States Senator after another went charging to defend
Glaspie, the harlot. It mattered not that they came from both the
Democrats and the Republicans. We, the people, let them get away
with their vile lies.
Up
|