Harvard
psychiatrist John Mack claims that tales of UFO
abductions are real.
But experts and former patients say his research is shoddy.
The young man had slowly become aware of his enigmatic memories, of
otherworldly beings lurking in his life, of “strange coincidences” and
time out of joint. What was happening? Who could tell him? Casting about
for help, says the boyish Pennsylvania health-care worker,
“I saw this article in
the newspaper about Dr. Mack. And I thought if you can’t
trust a Harvard professor, who can you trust?”
John Mack is more
than a Harvard professor; he is a respected author (his book on T.E.
Lawrence, A Prince of Our Disorder, won the Pulitzer Prize in 1977),
a psychiatrist who helped found the clinical psychiatry department at
Cambridge Hospital and a noted scientific advocate of environmental and
antiwar causes. Under Mack’s hypnotic guidance, the young man
“remembered” being abducted repeatedly by aliens, taken to a spaceship
and having a probe inserted in his anus. He also recalled past lives,
including one as a young Indian warrior called Panther-by-the-Creek,
who died in battle. Even more astonishing, Mack believed every
word.
The story of “Dave Reynolds” is one of 13 recounted by Mack in
his new book Abduction (Scribners), the result of his study of scores of
“experiencers,” people who he believes have come in contact with
extraterrestrial visitors. The striking similarity of their memories and
Mack’s academic reputation have led UFO believers to proclaim
Abduction as the most important step yet in scientifically
validating abduction experiences. A 1991 Roper poll found that 4
million people have had at least some abduction-related experiences,
such as seeing unusual lights or missing time.
“Until John came along,
there wasn’t enough credibility for this subject to support a
methodological investigation,” says Caroline McLeod, Mack’s
research chief. “Until now, if you decided to research alien
abductions, you risked being pigeonholed as a lunatic.”
Psychologists and ethicists
do not question Mack’s sanity so much as his motives and methodology.
They charge that he is misusing the techniques of hypnosis, trying to
shape the “memories” of his subjects to suit his vision of an
intergalactic future, and very possibly endangering the emotional
health of his patients in the process.
“If this were just an
example of some zany new outer limit of how foolish psychology and
psychiatry can be in the wrong hands, we’d look at it, roll our eyes
and walk away,” says University of California, Berkeley,
psychologist Richard Ofshe.
“But the use of his
techniques in counseling is substantially harming lots of people.”
The scientific skepticism is
bolstered by some unusual firsthand evidence. One of Mack’s
“experiencers” has revealed to TIME that she was actually an undercover
debunker who worked her way into Mack’s confidence and rose high in the
ranks of his subjects. She found that Mack’s work was riddled with
scientific irregularities; it lacked a formal research protocol as well
as legally required consent forms that advise research subjects of
potential risks. She also discovered that Mack billed the insurance
companies of at least some patient-subjects for what he described as
therapy sessions.
Mack says he expected the disbelief that has greeted the bizarre tales
recounted in his book.
“This isn’t supposed to
be,” he explained to TIME. “You aren’t supposed to have little guys
with big black eyes taking men, women and children against their
wills on beams of light through walls and windows into strange craft
and have this going on all over the country.”
But after hearing dozens of
such stories, Mack concluded that the abductions were real.
Moreover, he discerned a motive behind them: the abductors, it seems,
were implanting mind-to-mind messages urging better care of the planet.
The aliens’ apparent objective was an intergalactic breeding program
combined with a brotherly warning of impending doom if the earth doesn’t
change its warlike and ecologically wasteful ways.
Mack’s studies are largely funded by a tax-exempt, nonprofit research
organization that he founded in 1983, now called the Center for
Psychology and Social Change. With headquarters in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, the center was started as an attempt to study the nuclear
arms race in psychological terms. After the cold war ended, the
organization started raising money for scholars who want to combine
psychology with such topics as ecology and ethnic conflicts. Explains
the center’s executive director, Vivienne Simon:
“One of our main goals
is to challenge current scientific method, which is to deny all
things you cannot reduce to statistics.”
Donna Bassett’s story
seemed to fit right in with that goal. Bassett, 37, then a
Boston-based writer and researcher, became interested in Mack’s studies
after hearing complaints that he was “strip mining” the stories of
emotionally distraught people and failing to help them with follow-up
therapy. After reading stacks of books and articles on UFO abductions,
Bassett made up an elaborate story of otherworldly encounters involving
her family, going back to the 11th century. Her
great-grandmother, she said, saw “little people,” whom she called
angels from God. Bassett herself saw “balls of light” around
her house at age five. She also said that as a child she had a
space-alien friend named Jane, who healed her hands after a neighbor
stuck them in boiling fudge to punish her for snooping.
Bassett participated in three hypnotic-regression sessions (she
says she used method-acting techniques to fake her way through them) and
eventually served as treasurer of an abductee support group that Mack
organized and ran.
“I’ve never seen a
UFO in my life,” Bassett says, “and I certainly haven’t been inside
one.”
Bassett, who made
extensive tapes and notes of her life in the UFO cult, says Mack
provided her with UFO literature to read prior to her sessions—a
practice that medical hypnotists say will almost surely influence
hypnotic revelations. During the sessions, which Mack held in a
darkened bedroom in his house rather than in a neutral office, he asked
leading questions that reflected his biases.
“John made it obvious
what he wanted to hear,” says Bassett. “I provided the answers.”
Among other recollections,
she told of an encounter with John F. Kennedy and Nikita
Khrushchev on board a spaceship during the Cuban missile crisis.
Bassett said Khrushchev was crying and that “I sat in his lap, and I
put my arms around his neck, and I told him it would be O.K.” Hearing
her tale, Mack became so excited that he leaned on the bed too
heavily, and it collapsed.
Later, at a support-group session, Bassett confronted Mack
about mixing research and therapy. According to Bassett, Mack billed
insurance companies for some support-group sessions, claiming they were
“therapeutic” rather than “research.” Yet some members of the support
group complained about the lack of therapy following their traumatic
hypnosis sessions.
“That I can’t do
everything that each person needs does not mean that what I’m doing
is not therapeutic,” Mack said. “There are too many of you, and I’m
also doing research.”
Bassett’s account is
supported by others who had close encounters with Mack.
“He had a hidden
agenda,” says Dave Duclos, who left the experiment when he
became disenchanted. “He was against anybody who said anything
negative about the aliens. Once he said to me, ‘If you think the
aliens are bad, Mr.Duclos, keep thinking about it until you realize
they are good.’ “
But what of the surprising
consistency of the stories Mack elicited?
“Dr. Mack is ignoring
the high level of suggestion and imagery that surrounds the way in
which he deals with these people,” says Fred Frankel, 70, a
Harvard Medical School professor and psychiatrist in chief at
Boston’s Beth Israel hospital.
“Hypnosis helps you
regain memories that you would not have otherwise recalled... But
some will be true, and some will be false. The expectation of the
hypnotist and the expectation of the person who is going to be
hypnotized can influence the result.”
To many experts, the
abduction scenarios bear a striking resemblance to stories of satanic
rituals and child abuse—stories that can be shaped by all sorts of
outside influences, from movies and TV shows to the suggestive
questioning of a therapist. Says Ofshe, who is an expert in
hypnosis:
“If you convince someone
they’ve been brutalized and raped, and you encourage them to fully
experience the emotions appropriate for this event—and the event
never happened—you’ve led them through an experience of pain that is
utterly gratuitous.”
Confronted by TIME with the
news that Bassett had faked her abduction experience, Mack declined to
discuss her case, though he hinted that he had doubts about her
reliability. (Hers is not among the 13 case histories recounted in his
book, but tapes of her sessions leave little doubt that Mack took her
seriously.) In general, he insists, there is no evidence that the core
memories he elicited are distorted.
“When ((the subjects))
talk about this—and other people in the room with me have witnessed
this, including several psychiatrists—the experience is that of a
person who has been through something deeply disturbing.”
While acknowledging that he
is not “an expert on hypnosis,” Mack scoffs at the debunkers.
“The attacks on hypnosis
didn’t begin until it began to reveal information that the culture
didn’t want to hear.”
Mack’s view of the
UFO phenomenon reflects a larger philosophical stance that rejects
“rational” scientific explanations and embraces a hazier New Age
reality.
“I don’t know why
there’s such a zeal to find a conventional physical explanation,” he
says.
“I don’t know why people
have such trouble simply accepting the fact that something unusual
is going on here... We have lost the faculties to know other
realities that other cultures still can know. The world no longer
has spirit, has soul, is sacred. We’ve lost all that ability to know
a world beyond the physical... I am a bridge between those two
worlds.''