by Brian Desborough
December 1999
from
Whale Website
This is a response to the E Magazine criticisms raised by "Wendy
Loveless" in regard to my "Who were the Israelites" article.
Regrettably, most of my leisure time is spent helping survivors of
mind-control projects, consequently this reply is less detailed than
the subject matter deserves.
The primary purpose of my article was to inform Israeli students
that archaeological evidence clearly refutes the biblical claims
that Israel is theirs by divine right. A secondary purpose was the
debunking of the elitist and odious claim promulgated by proponents
of British Israelism that the Caucasian population of Britain and
America is descended from the Davidic bloodline.
Having been engaged in advanced research and development projects
for some three decades, I’m well aware of the necessity for
researching a subject from first principles. Wendy appears not to
have followed this procedure, instead gleaning her information
primarily from the books obtainable from the website mentioned in
her E. Mail. This is the website of a bookpublisher located in Salt
Lake City - a center of Kolob worship; the
Mormon Church has a
vested interest in promoting British Israelism dogma.
This publisher offers books promoting British Israelism by such
authors as the late Colonel J.C. Gawier, Keeper of the Crown Jewlefs
under Queen Victoria. The British Israelite movement derived its
initial impetus from the attempt by the Crown to improve Victoria’s
popularity by falsely claiming that she was of the Davidic
bloodline.
What British Israelite authors apparently have failed to realize is
that archaeological excavations in the Holy Land have clearly
demonstrated that the lives and deeds of King David and Solomon, as
depicted in the Old Testament, are apochryphal stories written
during a much later era, in order to justify the dominance of the
Levites over Judean affairs. In a similar manner, much of the Lebor
Gabala - an Irish history compiled by Celts and early Christian
monks, also is largely apochryphal.
Because apochryphal stories are a means by which oligarchical powers
are able to exert influence over the masses, perhaps it behooves us
briefly to digress and peruse some major apochryphal tales.
The attack on Pearl
Harbor
This was not a surprise attack by Japan, as popularly believed; it
is a matter of record that several weeks prior to the attack, U.S.
Secretary of State Cordell Hull informed his journalist friend
Joe Lieb, that Japan would attack Pearl Harbor on December 7th., 1941.
Lieb leaked the information to the U.P. wire service. Only the
Honolulu Advertizer bothered to publish the U,P. news release.
The attack was a reprisal for the
Rockefeller-instigated cancellation of Japanese oil concessions in
China. Fearing that Japan might attack Russia, where the
Rockefellers had vested oil and lumber interests, J.P.Morgan’s
nephew was appointed Ambassador to Japan, in order to induce
Japanese warlords to attack the USA instead.
Another related apochryphal story is the supposed date of
Rockefeller puppet Franklin D. Roosevelt’s death. In actuality, he
was assassinated the previous year, his identity being assumed by
doubles. In his memoirs, Roosevelt’s son, Elliott, stated that
Stalin had informed him that his father was assassinated by "the
Churchill gang".
The Knights of the
Round Table
The truth behind the legend of King Arthur has been obscured both by
political expediency and the mists of time; are the stories of his
exploits and his last mysterious boat trip to Avalon true? Did the
knights of the Round Table exist, and was there a Merlin - or is it
all a romantic fable, swallowed hook, line and sinker, by gullible
New Agers?
Early English history followed an oral tradition, and was not
committed to writing until several centuries after the alleged birth
of Arthur. Unfortunately, key manuscripts, such as the Northern
Annals, disappeared in the 13th century, and are no longer
available to historians. Consequently, the two principal sources of
the Arthurian legend are the Histories of the Kings of Britain and
Chronicles of Scotland, by the mediaeval historians Geoffrey of
Monmouth and Hector Boece, respectively.
Arthur purportedly was born circa 475 A.D.; at the time of his
birth, Rome had withdrawn its four occupying legions, and the
eastern half of Britain was under Anglo-Saxon rule. Geoffrey locates
the scene of the Arthurian battles around Camelot Dun (Winchester),
which is a chronological problem, since that part of England was
already occupied by the Anglo-Saxons by the time of Arthur’s alleged
birth.
Some historians assert that the battles were fought in Cornwall,
which in earlier times was a larger region than at present. This is
problematical since the Anglo-Saxons did not lay claim to Cornwall,
thus eliminating the potential for armed conflict.
Gerald of Wales (c. 1147-1223) claimed that Glastonbury was the
fabled Camelot, and that the grave of Arthur and his queen was
opened there, in 1191, but there is no historical record of conflict
between Arthur’s knights and the Anglo-Saxons domiciled in the
Glastonbury region. Gerald was under the patronage of the
Benedictine Abbot of Glastonbury; making the spurious claim that
Arthur was buried at Glastonbury would not only be good for the
lucrative pilgrim trade, but would also discredit his rival,
Geoffrey of Monmouth, who was an Augustinian.
The majority of mediaeval manuscript references to Arthur’s chief
residence, located it in the northern English city of Caerleon
(Carlisle). In all probability, this particular Arthur was a minor
Romano-Briton border chieftan, who fought his battles locally along
the English / Scottish border. He probably would have been buried on
St Patrick’s Isle, in the Irish Sea, which used to serve as a
necropolis.
Ordinarily, the exploits of a minor border chieftan would not
receive national attention, however, Dubricius, the Archbishop of
Carlisle, was purportedly born circa 450 A.D., making him a
contemporary neighbor of this border chieftan. On his travels,
Dubricious possibly championed the exploits of Arthur over those of
rival border warlords. Dubricious may well have been one of a long
line of Merlins. "Merlin" is an agnomen - a title, not the name of a
person.
Merlin is the Old English term for a
blackbird., which suggests that the person who was appointed the
Merlin was associated with the druidic order known as the Black Man
during the 1st. century A.D.. The successful candidate for the
office of Black Man had to be adept in the esoteric arts,
particularly that of rainmaking. The fact that the Merlin is best
known for his occult powers, rather than for his religious prowess,
implies that Geoffrey of Monmouth may have confused a Black Man of
the 1st century with the major Christian evangelist Bishop Dubricious, who lived some three centuries later.
The unpopular and mentally-unbalanced King Henry 2nd. (1133-1189)
became alarmed upon learning of an ancient prophecy which claimed
that King Arthur did not die, but would return again. Hailing from
Anjou, the French center of occultism, Henry had what he claimed was
Arthur’s grave at Glastonbury excavated, thus ’proving" to a
superstitious populous, that Arthur was really dead and therefore
could not return to lead a rebellion. A lead cross was recovered
from "Arthur’s" alleged grave at Glastonbury; the cross was
inscribed with a text in debased uncials. However, this type of font
was not utilized until after Arthur’s purported era.
Apparently dismayed at his propensity for appearing naked in public
and chewing straw, King Henry’s wife, the very capable Eleanor of
Aquitaine, returned to her extensive French domains, where her
daughter, Marie de Champagne, commissioned Chretien de Troyes to
write an Arthurian romance. Since adultery was a favorite
pastime at
Marie’s court, Chretien, who specialized in writing lurid tales
involving rape and mayhem, created a fantasy, in which Queen
Guinavere commits adultery with Lancelot. Chretien probably added
factual history to his apocryphal romance, for he had access to at
least one manuscript from Beauvais Abbey, whose monks were
instrumental in reorganizing the administrative structure of
Scottish abbeys during the 12th century.
I believe that the story of the
Arthurian legend as we know it today is, in actuality, an apocryphal
composite created by mediaeval writers who confused the life of a
5th century border chieftain with that of the 1st century Pendragon
known to the Romans as Caractacus, who bore the tribal appellation "Arwiagus"
(Arthur) derived from the British "Arto", meaning "Bear".
A person of high ideals and founder of the first Christian church,
whose daughters became the toast of Roman society, Caractacus became
famous throughout Europe. Caractacus’s half-sister Clarine married
the Ban of Benwick and gave birth to a son - Lancelot.
The claim made by Geoffrey of Monmouth that the Arthurian battles
were fought in Southern England would not be correct for a
north-country border chieftan living in the 5th. century, but would
be in conformance with the known military campaigns of Caractacus,
during the 1st. century A.D.. The legendary Lady of the Lake may
have been Caractacus’s purported sister Anna, who was married to
Aaron Rheged. He bore the appellation "Lychlyn", meaning "Lake".
Since the Phoenicians had established
colonies in Britain since circa 2900 B.C., the sword Excalibur may
represent the Phoenician Sun Cross. This was portrayed on Hittite
seals as a human arm holding an upright ankh, symbolizing Divine
victory, The myth regarding Arthur withdrawing the sword from the
stone may be symbolic of the separation of the inner spiritual light
(represented by the sword) from the rock, indicative of the material
world.
In founding the first Christian Church at the Palaticum Britannicum
in Rome, Caractacus probably realized that the Druidic priesthood
had been unable to inspire and unify the British with a spiritual
zeal, and therefore attempted to accomplish this task, through the
promotion of Christianity, the early British form of which is
exalted throughout the Arthurian literary corpus.
There is no historical evidence that the biblical Joseph of Arimathea ever founded the first British church at Glastonbury, as
is claimed by writers possessing a Christian bias. It would be
unacceptably poor scholarship, however, not to determine whether the
legend arose from confusion with another Joseph who may have been
associated with the early British form of Christianity. According to
the Welsh Triads, Christianity was introduced to Britain in 37 A.D.
by Ilid, who founded a church at Inyswitryn, now known as the Isle
of Wight. The church’s administration and the name ’Inyswitryn’ was
allegedly transferred to Glastonbury in 63 A.D..
According to one tradition, Ilid was a cousin of Caractacus.
Interestingly, Caractacus’s Aunt Rhieinwylydd married Bicanys, of
Phoenician descent; he was a tin trader. After his retirement, his
business affairs were managed by his son Joseph, who purportedly
relocated to Arimathea. The biblical Joseph of Arimathea therefore
could possibly be British.
The Council of
Nine
Just as the UFO community is heavily influenced by disinformation
disseminated by well-known authors and lecturers known to be members
of an intelligence organization called
the Aviary, so the belief
structure of thousands of gullible New Agers is manipulated by
individuals claiming to channel information emanating from the "Nine
Principles of God".
Even if we ignore the blatant historical inaccuracies and
thinly-veiled racism emanating from this purportedly divine group of
celestial beings, the military and intelligence background of
Dr.Andrija Puharich, the founder of
the Nine cult, should be
sufficient to question the veracity of the channeled comments.
The Nine were first channeled in 1952 by an Asian mystic at Puharich’s laboratory. Puharich later formed the Round Table
Foundation purportedly to continue receiving transmissions from the
Nine via other channelers. The foundation was disbanded in 1958, but
channeling continued at Puharich’s laboratory. Prominently
associated with Pucharich in this venture were New Age guru
Dr. Jim Hurtak and convicted felon Eira Einhorn. The
Esalen Institute and
the Stamford Research Institute were also involved. This should have
raised a very large red flag, since both institutes have
participated in mind-control research (Charles Manson was an Esalen
visitor).
Moreover, Puharich served as a military officer at the U.S. Army
Chemical Center in Maryland at the time the center was conducting
LSD experiments. Puharich also worked with the CIA’s evil Sydney
Gottlieb on the development of directed-energy mind-control
techniques, at the time the Nine were initially channeled. Pucharich
later developed the first micro-chip tooth implant under a CIA
contract.
Puharich later fell out of favor with the intelligence community
after successfully developing a free-energy device (U.S. patent
4,394,230). He died following a convenient fall down a flight of
stairs.
By means of psycho-acoustic devices, Puharich had the capability of
projecting voices into the minds of "channelers", who believed they
were in communication with a divine source. This insidious activity,
which presumably is being conducted by other mind-control
programmers since Puharich’s death, has enabled the Illuminati to
control the belief-structure of a very large segment of the New Age
community. Hopefully, the above apocryphal tales will serve to
demonstrate the necessity for commencing selected research projects
from first principles.
In stating in my article that Tea Tephi was a Danite Princess who
settled in Ireland circa 1250 B.C., I was merely quoting a claim
published by Christian Fundamentalist organizations. Personally I
believe that Tea Tephi’s voyage to Ireland is an apocryphal tale.
All the bible tells us about King Zedekiah’s daughters is that the
princesses disobeyed
Yahwey and fled to Egypt., not Ireland.
As previously mentioned, the ancient history of Ireland as portrayed
in the Lebor Gabala and such works as the Book of Ballymote is
largely apocryphal, which is why it is imperative to return to first
principals in order to determine the source of such stories as the
origin of the Stone of Scone. We also must avoid linguistic pitfalls
when determining what early historians meant when they mentioned lvernia or Hibernia (Ireland). This is because the coastal region of
England extending from the county of Dorset to the Solent used to be
named Iwerne, which is cognate with ’Ivernia’; its inhabitants were
known as the Gwyddel, often translated as "Irish".
In the interests of good scholarship, we must search for any other
historical reference to a matriarchal figure possessing a ceremonial
stone, (preferably descended from a Middle Eastern tribe or clan)
whose arrival in Ireland substantially predated that of Tea Tephi.
Our search for such a person begins not in Ireland, but at an
elevation of 5200 feet up the western flank of Mount Ararat, at the
town of Van. Believed to have been founded by Queen Semiramis,
according to Armenian tradition, it is located near Lake Van. In
prehistoric times, this lake supplied the headwaters of the Tigris
and Euphrates rivers.
The ancient tribal people who originally inhabited this region were
known variously as the Vans, Bans, Wans, Fens or Fins. Their tribal
name became appended to the names of countries and townships which
sprang up as they migrated westward to Britain and Ireland. Thus the
ancient name of Britain was Alban, later Albion. Paisley was
originally Vanduara and the name Findhorn still survives. Van Lake,
in Wales, was traditionally sacred to a Lady of the Lake.
According to tradition, a matriarch and her serpent-worshipping clan
landed in South-Western Ireland at Duna-mark, which is in Bantry
Bay, not later than 1000B.C., which predates the era of Tea Tephi
and that of the first Jewish diaspora. The matriarch’s name was
Ceasair, which is cognate with "Kvasir" ("wise person of the sacred
cauldron" mentioned in the Gothic Eddas). According to the Eddas,
the matriarch of the Vans had a consort / son named Baldr, cognate
with the "Balor of the evil eye", who was the champion of the Irish
Feins.
A later Irish hero was Fal, Fal’s Hill
being at the ancient capital Tara. Very significantly, Baldr, Balor
and Fal were tribal champions, and all were possessors of a magic
stone. In later Irish legends, Fal’s Stone cried out during the
coronation of Celtic monarchs; it is purportedly the coronation
Stone of Scone.
In similar fashion, the legend of St. Bridget appears to have been
derived from the tale of the matriarchal sorceress Frigg, the
"Mother of the Wolf of Fen", ’Fen" being cognate with "Van". Frigg
allegedly was the leader of a group of serpent cult priestesses
known as "the Nine Maidens". Maiden Stone monoliths bearing serpent
emblems are found in various parts of Britain.
According to my esteemed friend
Mr. Credo Mutwa, the Sanusi and
official historian of the Zulu Nation, ancient races were forbidden
by their overlords to depict dragons, hence the adoption of
serpents
in lieu.
The Tuatha de Danaan were a later serpent-worshipping wave of Van
immigrants, their champion "Lug" being the counterpart of "Loki", a
champion of the Vans who opposed the Goths, according to the Eddas.
Both used a sling shot as a weapon.
The last known clans of the Vans in Ireland were known as the
Fomorians, and in the Eddas as the "Baombur"; they were purportedly
defended by dragons. The serpent-worshipping Fomorians were
vanquished by the solar-worshipping army of Part-olon circa 400
B.C.
Part-olon was a Phoenician, who, according to ancient British
chronicles, arrived in Ireland from the Mediterranean via Scotland (
a Hitto / Phoenic seal depicts their arch-deity Mikal defeating a
winged dragon). A solar-oriented army defeating a serpent tribe is
probably the origin of the fable in which St. Patrick rids Ireland
of serpents, particularly since St. Patrick allegedly was in Ireland
during the same century as Part-olon.
It should be self-evident from the above that the key elements of
the Tea Tephi tale are to be found in the earlier occupation of
Ireland by the Vans.
Let us now examine the biblical account of King David’s reign. As I
explained in my Israelite article, archaeological evidence reveals
that the Old Testament appears primarily to be an historical fable
concocted by the Levites either during, or shortly after their
Babylonian captivity, in order to justify their establishment of a
Judean theocracy. I believe the biblical account of King David’s
life to be largely apocryphal.
Deuteronomy claims that God commanded the Israelites to cross
over the Jordan and dispossess "great cities fortified to heaven".
What God is this? Is it the Yahu of the proto-Israelites,
YHWH, or one of the Gods mentioned in textual inscriptions
discovered in the Negev hill country and in Judean territory, such
as Jehovah Terman and Jehovah Shomron? And what about
Mrs. God?
These inscriptions send blessings in the name of
Jehovah and his Asherah!
The inscriptions were written during the 8th century B.C.,
which suggests that at the alleged era of David (10th. century B.C.)
the kingdoms of Israel and Judea were not monotheistic, which
contradicts the Bible.
During the 19th. century, German biblical scholars, led by Julian Wellhausen, challenged
the infallibility of the Old Testament,
claiming that its historicity was largely a fable concocted for
theological reasons. American archaeologist William Albright, set
out to prove the historical veracity of the Bible by conducting
major digs during the 1920’s, at such key biblical sites as Meggido
and Jericho. In particular, Albright and his associates were
determined to prove the veracity of Joshua’s conquest of Canaanite
cities and to seek evidence of the "united monarchy" of David, which
the Bible describes as the pinnacle of Israel’s military and
economic power.
Alas for the efforts of Albright and numerous subsequent
archeologists, the great fortified Canaanite cities that Joshua
supposedly conquered revealed themselves to be very small and
largely unfortified settlements, whose culture declined over a
period lasting several centuries, demonstrative that Joshua’s
conquest of Canaan never occurred.
The major constructions supposedly established under Solomon’s
direction at Hazor and Meggido never became a reality. Only 7.5
acres was fortified at Hazor, while Meggido lacked a fortified wall.
In actuality. these supposedly major cities were merely very minor
settlements.
Hebron, a city which dates from the third millenium B.C., was
allegedly King David’s capital before his supposed capture of
Jerusalem. Recent excavations at the site, located at Tel Runeida,
led to the discovery of artifacts of the 8th century B.C., but
evidence of David’s supposed capital city of the 10th century is
absent. Moreover, the site occupies an area of less than eight
acres. Even if 10th century evidence is found at another part of
the Tel, its area will still represent a minor settlement, not a
significant city.
The same situation applies to Jerusalem (the City of David): despite
numerous excavations which have been conducted in Jerusalem for more
than a century, no structures dating from the period of David’s
united monarchy have been discovered. Joab, King David’s general,
supposedly gained entry to Jerusalem by climbing up a water shaft
and surprising the city’s Jebusite populace. Seeking verification of
the tale, some biblical scholars claim that this particular water
shaft was one discovered in 1867 by British explorer Charles Warren.
The shaft in question is a very ancient natural karstic formation.
Archaeologists Eli Shukron and Ronny Reich have recently stated that
the upper end of the shaft was man-made after the time of David’s
reign; therefore it could not have been used by David’s general to
access the city.
Jerusalem’s rich culture did not occur until after its northern
rival Samaria was conquered in 722 B.C. Since no evidence of David’s
purported substantial cities, nor evidence of his united monarchy
have been discovered despite extensive archaeological searches, it
is apparent that if David ever existed at all, he was a very minor
chieftan, not a monarch of substance.
Even the story of David slaying Goliath
is questionable, for not to be upstaged by David, David’s nephew
also killed a giant at Gath, according to 2 Samuel. Samuel also
claims that a Bethlehemite by the name of Elhanan killed a giant
named Goliath during a battle at Gath. 1 Chronicles would have us
believe that Elhanan also killed yet another giant (Lahmi) who was
Goliath’s brother. War broke out again , this time at Gezer, and
Sippai, a descendant of giants was slain by Sibbecai.
After my Israelite article was posted on the internet, an explosive
article by Jewish scholar Ze’ev Herzog appeared in the October 29th
issue of Ha’aretz.
Entitled "Deconstructing the walls of Jericho",
the article began,
"Following 70 years of intensive
excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have found
out: The Patriarchs’ acts are legendary, the Israelites did not
sojourn in Egypt or make an exodus, they did not conquer the
land. Neither is there any mention of the empire of David and
Solomon, nor of the source of a belief in the God of Israel.
These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn
people and nobody wants to hear about it."’
The lengthy article, which cites
supportive archaeological data, states:
" ...the great united monarchy [of
David and Solomon] is an imaginary historiosophic creation,
which was composed during the period of the Kingdom of Judea at
the earliest Perhaps the most decisive proof of this is the fact
that we do not know the name of this kingdom."
In claiming descent from the Davidic
bloodline, the British Israelites and the European Oligarchy have
backed a loser, due to the abundance of archaeological evidence that
the mighty regional united monarchy of David never existed. Far
better to have claimed descent from the Phoenicians, whose
colonization of Britain in preRoman times is a given. Such a concept
would, however, be anathema to the Illuminati, who were ancient
adversaries of the Phoenicians, which is why the legend of St.
George slaying the dragon stems from Cappadocia -- the central
province of the Hitto-Phoenics.
That the European Oligarchy and the Order of the Dragon should also
promote British Israelism is not surprising when one considers that
British Israelism was created by occultist, astrologer and spy
John
Dee, the father of modern freemasonry. Dee, who received esoteric
instruction from Rabbi Loew, the alleged creator of a golem (a
humanoid) was noted for his bizarre occult rituals involving
cadavers stolen from graves, who signed his espionage reports to
Queen Elizabeth 1st, 007.
Sadly, British Israelism has a widespread following, which is a
tragedy, for its afficionados exhibit the same disgraceful "holier
than thou" elitism that pervades a large segment of the New Age
community. Such elitism is often a precursor to wars fought in the
name of God.
I strongly urge all readers of this website to closely monitor
current archaeological digs occurring in Israel, for Kabbalistic
rabbis and certain prominent Christian Fundamentalists are
instrumental in promoting an on-going search for the Kalal
containing the ashes of the magical red heifer, which is referenced
in the so called copper scroll and in the Book of Numbers (19, 1-19).
According to Judaic tradition, the Temple cannot be reconstructed at
Jerusalem until the ashes of the legendary red heifer are found.
A senior Illuminati historian has
informed me that as a back-up plan, a very pure-blooded red heifer
is currently being raised. In accordance with Judaic custom, it will
have to be sacrificed before October of this year, presumably on a
Judaic holy day. Since a seismic faultline traverses the Mount of
Olives, the Illuminati are also planning to create a geophysically-generated
earthquake sufficiently strong to destroy the Islamic Dome of the
Rock. The heifer’s ashes will then be used to purify the Temple
Mount, prior to reconstruction of the Temple.
During the 19th century, correspondence between Illuminists Albert
Pike and Guiseppi Mazzini discussed Illuminati plans for the
implementation of three global wars, which were to be precursors to
the establishment of a totalitarian global government.
-
World War I was to be initiated by
creating political differences between Britain and Germany.
Communism would be implemented in Russia and used for the
purpose of conquering other nations.
-
World War II would destroy the
German Empire and foster sympathy for oppressed Jews, in order
to establish the State of Israel. Communism was to be expanded
until it equalled the strength of the Western Powers, at which
time its growth would be checked.
-
World War III would be initiated by
fomenting ideological differences between Jew and Arab. The
other global powers will choose sides and destroy each other.
The survivors, disillusioned with existing religions, will
embrace the Illuminati Luciferic religion. Out of the chaos of
war, a
New World Order will be created.
The on-going search for the ashes of the
fabled red heifer is currently focussed on the region immediately
north of Wadi Qumran. I surmise that when the Illuminati timetable
calls for an Arab / Israeli nuclear holocaust, in order to commence
World War III, the red heifer’s ashes conveniently will be
"discovered". This will provide the rationale for the destruction of
the Islamic mosque known as the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, and
its replacement with the New Temple - an act guaranteed to initiate
a nuclear Holy War (Israeli children are currently undergoing
training as future Temple priests).
In conclusion, there are other important biblical stories which are
considered by many lay persons to be apocryphal - the Holy Grail and
the Ark of the Covenant being prime examples. Even though history,
as taught to the masses, has been subjected to major obfuscation by
Illuminati historians, it is necessary for
the Illuminati to
maintain accurate accounts of major historical events for
themselves. Children of
Illuminati bloodline families who have been
selected to serve important Illuminati roles, receive some of their
arduous training at the Mothers of Darkness chateau near Muno,
Belgium, where they are taught the true history of the world.
It had been hoped that the public revelations concerning Illuminati
matters provided by former Mother Goddess Arizona Wilder, would have
prompted other Illuminati bloodline mind-controlled survivors to go
public with their exposes. With one exception, this has not
occurred. This is because other survivors who could verify the
authenticity of Ms. Wilder’s claims have been deterred by the vile
invective directed toward Ms. Wilder on this website [forum] by
incredibly ill-informed individuals, who hypocritically end their
vitriolic and racist E-Mail messages with the word "love".
One criticism levelled at Ms. Wilder questioned why, if she had a
photographic memory as she claimed, did she have difficulty
remembering certain topics during her videotaped interview with
Mr.
David Icke. The reason for her memory lapses is that mind-controlled
victims who are programmed to serve as intelligence couriers are
subjected to a surgical procedure known as "brain-stem scarring",
which permits certain alter-personalities to receive a photographic
memory.
For obvious reasons, the front alter is
never programmed to have such a photographic memory. Since Ms.
Wilder’s alters which possess such a memory capability were never
accessed during the interview, (which would have required knowledge
of the appropriate access code) she was unable to recall certain
topics.
For the record, I first observed shapeshifting while conducting
exorcisms during the 1970’s. It was during that period that it
became apparent to me that some of the clients who complained of
hearing inner voices were not the victims of psychic attack, but
instead had been the subject of trauma-based programming. Prior to
meeting Ms. Wilder, I had encountered other mind-control survivors
who hailed from bloodline families, including one lady who had
attained the rank of Mother of Darkness and had served as a member
of Ms. Wilder’s court during rituals.
It is customary for bloodline children
who have been genetically-bred to possess advanced psychic
abilities, to be trained for a multiplicity of functions, e.g.,
-
to
provide psychic power for Illuminati rituals
-
to be an intelligence
courier or psy-ops assassin
-
to telepathically communicate with
extra-terrestrials and dolphins at covert military bases
In view of my hi-tech professional background, which includes
free-energy and anti-gravitic developmental projects, I was able to
corroborate the description of covert subterranean facilities given
me by Ms. Wilder. One interesting little-known fact that she told me
was that she had observed certain oligarchical families wearing
period costumes when dining in private.
This was recently corroborated when an
artist, who has painted the portraits of various members of the
European nobility, informed me that she has observed the same thing,
adding that because the type of stitching formerly used on some
elaborate period dresses is unknown to current seamstresses, some
oligarchical families retain their own specially-trained
seamstresses.
In claiming to have been shown both the pre-Christian era Holy Grail
(a gold cauldron, not a cup) and the Ark of the Covenant, Ms. Wilder
has provided me with not only detailed descriptions of these
artifacts and their present locations, but also the contents of the
Ark (not Mosaic tablets). Without any prompting, a high Illuminati
initiate has provided me with the same corroborative information.
The courageous Ms. Wilder (who required hospitalization for the
brutal beating she received for quitting the Illuminati) is a
repository for a vast amount of information concerning covert
political matters to which she was privy ( e.g. the role of Queen
Elizabeth and Pamela Harriman in the election of President
Clinton)
in addition to detailed information regarding communication with
extraterrestrials. Valid critical commentary is always acceptable,
but thanks to the vitriolic attack which has been directed toward
Ms. Wilder on this website [forum], it is highly unlikely that she
will ever again risk her life by attempting to inform the public on
sensitive matters.
I note that one pathetic young soul refers to her on this website
[forum] as Arizona WILDer. Having a first-hand knowledge of Ms.
Wilder’s remarkable psychic powers, I can only state that since she
was a former member of the Janus psy-ops team, this silly individual
would almost certainly have met the same fate as former KGB chief
Yuri Andropov, had Ms. Wilder elected not to dismiss his ignorant
comments.
Permit me to close with a missive for such sorry detractors. You
appear to obtain much of your information from New Age publications,
most of which aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on. If you wish
to obtain factual information concerning the Illuminati esoteric
subjects or extra-terrestrials, be of service to others by helping
mind-control survivors (there are several million of them in the USA
alone).
This will provide you with meaningful
intelligence information. Next, leave your own front doorstep and
get out in the world and learn to access the Illuminati, the
Intelligence Community and covert facilities. Only then will you
possess the expertise to discuss such subjects intelligently.
Until
then, SHUT UP!
|