Chapter 6
Treason Beneath a Clear Blue Sky
Why was Standard Operating Procedure blatantly ignored for just one
day in 2001? Why were none of the planes intercepted?
Andrews Air Force Base is only ten miles from the Pentagon. Air
defense around Washington is provided mainly by fighter planes from
Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland near the District of Columbia
border. The D.C. Air National Guard is also based there and equipped
with F-16 fighter planes.
In a blatant reversal of Standard Operating Procedure, the Air
Force, via willful negligence, is given stand down orders not to
intercept Flight 77, which will subsequently hit the Pentagon.
Flight 77 is known by NORAD to have been hijacked by 8:50am. Yet it
is a full 48 minutes until any fighters are scrambled, as two leave
Langley AFB just two minutes before Flight 77 hits the Pentagon at
9:40am.
Andrews AFB had two combat ready squadrons that would have
intercepted Flight 77 had they been allowed to leave upon
confirmation of its hijacking. It is Standard Operating Procedure to
intercept all air traffic that fails to respond to radio calls
immediately. This was the case with the golfer Payne Stewart’s
chartered Lear Jet that crashed in October 1999. F-16 Fighters
(without the need of a Presidential mandate) had intercepted the
aircraft within 21 minutes.
This represents willful coordinated
negligence between the FAA, NORAD, the Pentagon (who also track all
air traffic) and President Bush, who as this was all unfolding, was
reading a book about a pet goat to a group of schoolchildren.
Perplexing Connections
One of the biggest smoking guns to indicate that the terrorist
attack was an inside job is the CIA’s direct connection with the
hijackers via Pakistan ISI Director General Mahmoud Ahmad. General Mahmoud Ahmad instructed Ahmad Umar Sheikh to hotwire $100,000 to
the 9/11 lead hijacker, Mohammad Atta. On September 11th, Ahmad was
a guest of former clandestine CIA officer and CFR member Rep. Porter
Goss and Skull and Bones/CFR member Senator Bob Graham.
Since
September 4th, he had met with top brass at the CIA, the Pentagon
and the White House, including Colin Powell, Richard Armitage,
Joseph Biden and George Tenet.
Condoleezza Rice lied in a May 16th 2002 press conference when she
claimed ignorance of Ahmad’s visit and the $100,000 transfer. Ahmad
had already resigned from the ISI and the FBI had confirmed the
circumstances behind this. Rice stated, “I have not seen that
report, and he was certainly not meeting with me.”
What was the money man behind the terrorists doing in the halls of
the US government before, during and after 9/11? This is just one
example of the firm alliance running through the CIA, which in turn
controls the ISI, which in turn controls Osama bin Laden and
Al-Qaeda.
The Incredible 9/11 Evidence We’ve All Been Overlooking
In trying to piece together what really happened on September 11, a
lot of work has been done - much of it useful and interesting - into
those hijacked flights for which the publicly available evidence is
sketchy and contradictory. There are web sites for instance wholly
dedicated to investigating the true fate of Flight 93 and others
that attempt to get a clearer idea of what really happened at the
Pentagon. Both these incidents however are characterized by a
pronounced absence of substantive material evidence and it is this,
I suppose, that raises our suspicions and curiosity.
There is one flight however that has received insufficient attention
and this is American Airlines Flight 11, the plane that allegedly
crashed into WTC 1, the north tower. It was the first of the
terrorist attacks that day. It has been a big mistake not to subject
this flight to the same kind of scrutiny as the others because,
unlike the others, a very good and important piece of documentary
evidence of this flight exists in the public domain. This is the
so-called ‘Fireman’s Video’ and we really haven’t looked at it
closely enough. It really does deserve a second look.
The story of the ‘Fireman’s Video’ is well known. Two French
filmmakers, the Naudet Brothers, were in New York on September 11
making a documentary about the New York Fire Service. The footage
shows that, while filming in Canal Street, firemen and crew are
distracted by a plane flying low overhead. The camera operator
instinctively turns his camera towards the north tower and, for
little more than a second or so, we get a clear view of the plane
crashing into the north tower. It is a precious, priceless second.
It is the one-second of video that really makes the sinister Bush
junta nervous. It really gives them nightmares.
They really didn’t
want a professional cameraman to catch that moment on
broadcast-quality tape.
FIG 6.1
[CAPTION: The Naudet Brother’s video of the first
plane crashing into the WTC.]
This photo from the Naudet Brothers
classic video shows the aircraft separating with the White Jet
flying over the tower
If you’ve got it on tape (see below video) I strongly suggest you take another look
at it, with the pause and frame-forward buttons at the ready.
When seen at full speed, you might first of all think that there
isn’t a great deal to see. There’s half a second or so when we see
the plane flying through the air then it smashes into the tower,
creating an explosion and leaving a great gash across the building.
Notice though that immediately before it hits the building the plane
emits a brief, bright flash. Notice too that the scar it leaves on
the building is rather larger than seems appropriate for the size of
the aircraft.
Now pause the sequence at the beginning and advance it frame by
frame. Firstly, look at the plane. Does that look like a Boeing jet
to you? Is its wingspan wide enough? Does it have engines attached
to its wings? These however are but minor details compared with what
comes next. Watch carefully what happens as the plane approaches and
crashes into the tower. I leave you to come to your own conclusions
about what you see (watch it over and over again, backwards and
forwards), but I’ll tell you what I see.
Immediately before the plane strikes it fires a missile that blows a
hole in the
building’s facade. This is the cause of that brief flash. The plane
then begins to
disappear neatly into this hole, leaving no wing impressions. A
plane
disappearing into a hole? Where have I heard that before; wasn’t
there
something about a plane at the Pentagon? Just before it disappears
however it fires two more missiles from somewhere near its tail. One
goes to the left, one to the right (and up a bit) and it is the
blast holes from these three separate missiles that form the great
gash across the building. There’s more.
Keep an eye on the adjacent
east side of the building, which is also visible. See how, a few
frames into the explosion, a white jet of smoke erupts out of the
east side at the same level as the plane. The jet comes straight out
of the wall at right angles to it, not angled in accordance with the
trajectory of the plane. Also it’s just white smoke and dust, no
orange flames or anything like that. It is clearly a bomb going off,
creating the gash that appears on the east wall. I know what I am
describing sounds incredible. I suggest only that you look at the
footage yourself (below video) and come to your own conclusions about what you
see.
The plane that hit the north tower was not American Airlines Flight
11. It was not a Boeing 757. It was a bespoke military plane
carrying three missiles that created the impression of a plane crash
without leaving any wreckage. In order for it precisely to strike
the correct part of the tower (in line with the bomb already planted
in the east wall) it must have been flown remotely using cruise
navigation. I believe a similar plane was used to strike the
Pentagon.
It is instructive to compare the footage of the first crash (Flight
11) with the second one (Flight 175) of which there is a great deal
of footage. Now: both Flight 11 and 175 were 767s. They were both
flying from Boston to the West coast and they had both been in the
air for around 45 minutes before they crashed so they should have
had roughly the same amount of fuel on board. Compare the two
crashes. Flight 11 is a rather modest explosion which clears soon
and there isn’t much flame. What flame there is reddish. The
collision of Flight 175 on the other hand produces a vast yellow
fireball that dominates Manhattan and the resultant fire is pretty
intense.
I think what we can deduce from this is that Flight 11 had very
little fuel on board (the missiles and bomb cause the principal
explosion) while Flight 175 was probably full of fuel, thus giving a
more spectacular show for the media that had by then arrived. Also
Flight 175 is clearly not a military plane but a regular 767. It has
no missiles and nor is it flown using cruise navigation because the
‘pilot’ almost misses the building and has to swerve in at the last
second. A cruise-controlled craft would not do this.
The ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ have got it dead right this time. The
true Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93 were indeed substituted with other
planes when the transponders were switched off. Someone hijacked the
hijackers to make sure the job was done properly. The technology
enabling interception of aircraft via remote control from the ground
has existed for years,
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc.
developed a remote-controlled reconnaissance plane for the Air Force
called Predator, which flew in Bosnia during the conflict there.
Used by the military since 1994, it can be landed by pilots linked
by satellite using controls on the ground or ordering an onboard
computer to do the job.1
A top panel of experienced civilian and
military pilots (conspiracy theorists) under the chairmanship of
Colonel Donn de Grand met for an exhaustive 72-hour conference in
Portugal. The committee was endorsed by Dr. Paul Roberts, former
Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury, and presently Senior
Research Fellow at Stamford University.
They concluded that the
flight crews of the four passenger airliners, involved in the
September 11th tragedy, had no control over their aircraft, In a
detailed press communiqué the inquiry stated:
“The so-called
terrorist attack was in fact a superbly executed military operation
carried out against the USA, requiring the utmost professional
military skill in command, communications and control. It was
flawless in timing, in the choice of selected aircraft to be used as
guided missiles and in the coordinated delivery of those missiles to
their pre-selected targets.”2
1 ‘Landing by remote control doesn’t
quite fly with pilots’ – Jeff Long – Chicago Tribune – September 28
2001 -
http://www.chicagotribune.com/technology/chi-0109280208sep28.story
2
‘September 11 - US Government accused’ – The News (Portugal) –
August 3 2002 – available at
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/september_11_us_government_accused.htm
FIG 6.2
[CAPTION: Colonel Donn de Grand’s
expert commission concluded that an
attack of such professional military precision
could not possibly
have been carried out by amateur hijackers, many of which couldn’t
even fly small private planes.]
In evidence given to the enquiry, Captain Kent Hill (retd.) of the
US Air Force, and friend of Chic Burlingame, the pilot of the plane
that crashed into the Pentagon, stated that the US had on several
occasions flown an unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing
737, across the Pacific from Edwards Air Force base in California to
South Australia. According to Hill it had flown on a pre-programmed
flight path under the control of a pilot in an outside station. The
panel questioned why none of the pilots punched in the four-digit
code into the flight transponder to alert ground control that a
hijacking had taken place.
Colonel Donn de Grand summarized by
saying that the attack was carried out by the U.S. government to
deceive its people into backing a crusade against Muslims and an
eventual war against Iraq. This major report by respected experts
received absolutely no attention in the States or Britain. Why?
Where is the government’s rebuttal? Where is their evidence to prove
it was carried out by Al-Qaeda? They haven’t presented any.
The ‘Fireman’s Video’ is Bush’s true smoking gun
It is in the
public domain and it is even available on DVD. It is probably
sitting in the video shelves of thousands and thousands of homes
across the world. It is vitally important that the American people
see this video frame by frame so they can make their own minds up
about what really happened on September 11.
There has been a silent coup in America but few have noticed yet.
The Bush Administration is clearly very sinister indeed and God only
knows what it has in store for us next. There is a clue though in
the things of which it accuses Saddam Hussein: building and using
weapons of mass destruction (nuclear and biological) and killing his
own people.
Bush is of course describing himself. We have entered
the Age of the Conjurer and it is going to be a tricky time. The
9-11 stunt was a huge magic trick and we all bought it at first.
Magicians can be very convincing. You have to look very hard to see
the trick and not be fooled. On this occasion slow motion exposes
the sleight of hand, but remember how the magician works: he can
make almost anything seem real if he can make his audience look in
the wrong place at crucial moments.
Only the American people can now stop the imminent slaughter and the
imposition of a global fascist police state, but they are currently
sleepwalking into their own enslavement. It may already be too late.
But maybe if enough Americans get out their videos and their remote
controls (pardon the pun) and take a long hard look at that
remarkable footage of that plane hitting the north tower, then an
armed and outraged middle America might just pull it off. After
trawling through 50+ pages of September 11 eyewitness accounts from
the New York Times, I could not find a single one from onlookers on
the ground or in either tower, who stated that the object that hit
the north tower was a large commercial airliner.
However, let’s not
get carried away. The issue at hand is the suspicious way the object
hit the tower and the question of anomalies that would indicate
multiple use of missiles. The object could very well be what it is
reported as being, American Airlines Flight 11.
Or is it?
Public Action report,
The second clue comes from the first New York eyewitness on NBC. She
had no question about what she saw. You could hear it in her voice.
If she was the state’s witness, the defense team would have their
heads between their knees before she stopped talking.
What did she say?
She heard an airplane coming in low and looked up.
She saw a small private jet, and watched it fly into the first WTC
tower, the North tower. She was certain in her description—most
people know the difference between a big round-nose commercial jet
and a smaller plane.3
Furthermore,
In his testimony before the
Senate Armed Services Committee on October 25, 2001, NORAD commander
Ralph Eberhart said of the first September 11 report,
“We were told
it was a light commuter airplane. It didn’t look like that (damage)
was caused by a light commuter airplane.”4
As is now well known, at
least eight of the September 11 “suicide hijackers" either died
before the event or are actually still alive. This isn’t some kind
of Internet conspiracy theory; it’s been reported in mainstream
media across the world. Furthermore, four of the five named Flight
11 hijackers are still alive and could not have been on the plane
that hit the north tower. Beside the fact that according to their
flight school instructors they could barely fly a Cessna, never mind
a Boeing 767.
Mohammed Atta, the son of a successful lawyer, grew up in a
middle-class Cairo neighborhood. Not only did he have a good
education, but so did his two sisters - one a university lecturer,
the other a doctor. His father drives a Mercedes, and the family has
a seaside home. Hardly the profile of a fundamentalist with an
overbearing grudge against wealth and capitalism.
Atta’s father, again to emphasize, a well respected lawyer and not a
crackpot, is in the media every other month telling of how his son
is still alive and had nothing to do with September 11,
“He is
hiding in a secret place so as not to be murdered by the US secret
services,” Mohammed el-Amir Atta, 66, told the German newspaper Bild
am Sonntag. “As I saw the picture of my son,” he said, “I knew that
he hadn’t done it. My son called me the day after the attacks on
September
12 at around midday. We spoke for two minutes about this and that.”5
3 ‘Flight Of The Bumble Planes’ – Public Action – March 10
2002 - http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html
4 ‘Senate Armed
Services Committee Holds Hearing on Role of Defense Department in
Homeland Security’ –Congressional Hearings – October 25 2001 -
http://www.ngaus.org/newsroom/HomelandDefenseTranscript.doc
5 ‘Father insists alleged leader is still alive’ – Kate Connolly –
London Guardian – September 2 2002 -
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/oneyearon/story/0,12361,784541,00.html
The BBC reported,
Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the
FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into
the World Trade Centre on 11 September. His photograph was released,
and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the
world. Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco.
He told journalists there that he had nothing to do with the attacks
on New York and Washington, and had been in Morocco when they
happened. He has contacted both the Saudi and American authorities,
according to Saudi press reports.
He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Dayton
Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al Shehri
to whom the FBI has been referring. But, he says, he left the United
States in September last year, became a pilot with Saudi Arabian
airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco.6
FIG 6.3
[CAPTION: BBC reports on the ‘suicide hijackers’
that are still alive]
Wail M. Al-Shehri is the son of a Saudi
diplomat in Bombay. Gaafar Allagany, head of the Saudi Embassy’s
information center, told the L.A. Times back in late September 2001
that “I personally talked to both father and son today.”7 There are
discrepancies concerning the identity of Abdulaziz Al-Omari. It
seems there are two of him, either of which could have been on board
AA Flight 11. However, both are still alive.
The BBC reported,
“Mr.
Al-Omari, a pilot with Saudi Airlines, walked into the US embassy in
Jeddah to demand why he was being reported as a dead hijacker in the
American media.”
The London Independent also investigated the case and came to the
same
conclusion, that there were two Al-Omari’s, both of whom were alive
and shocked
at being named as 9/11 hijackers. Abdulaziz Al-Omari number two is
an electrical
engineer, also based in Saudi Arabia. The New York Times reported,
“Al-Omari
has since been found in Saudi Arabia and is apparently cleared in
the case.”
Al-Omari number two himself, in a September 23 London Telegraph
article, stated,
“I couldn’t believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave
my name and
my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am
alive. I have no
idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this.”8
6 ‘Hijack suspects alive and well’ – BBC – September 23 2001 -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
7 ‘FBI Chief Raises New Doubts Over Hijackers’ Identities’ – Lisa
Getter – L.A. Times – September 21 2001 -
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-092101probe.story
8 ‘Revealed: the men with stolen identities’ – David Harrison –
London Telegraph – September 23 2001 -
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen23.xml
The only Flight 11 hijacker who hasn’t been found alive is Satam M.
A. Al Suqami. His passport was ‘found in the rubble’ at ground zero
after the attacks, if you can even entertain such a preposterous
notion! Still, he must have been a pretty fast worker to have
overpowered a staff of nine flight attendants, two pilots and
eighty-one passengers, before guiding the plane into the WTC north
tower with expert precision.
From this evidence it is by no means a leap of the imagination to
suggest that Flight 11, if it was Flight 11, was hijacked not by
Muslim terrorists but by Global Hawk remote control technology. The
plane was loaded beforehand with advanced laser missiles, which were
fired just before it entered the building. This was to ensure the
building would later collapse, destroying the evidence. Such
advanced weaponry would explain early reports attributing the
unusually low death toll to victims being vaporized, therefore
leaving no trace of their remains.
The north tower collapsed after
the south tower, even though it was hit first. Using the
conventional explanation of the tower’s collapse, namely ‘oh, you
see, the towers got really hot and, erm, melted,’ we would expect
that the first tower to be hit would also be the first one to
collapse. This was not the case. The south tower collapsed first
because it was clearly filled to the brim with shape charger bombs
that detonated just before, and during its collapse.
The untold story of Flight 11 is merely another drop in the ocean of
evidence confirming the highest levels of the US government not only
had prior knowledge of September 11 but actually engineered the
attacks. As more smoking guns surface, it becomes clear that, on at
least two of the four flights hijacked that day, there were no
‘suicide hijackers’ at all.
What Brought the Towers Down?
Many researchers have asked the basic question – why did the towers
collapse and why did they collapse so quickly? No building had ever
collapsed before from fire damage. Why was there no satisfactory
investigation of the World Trade Center rubble? Why was it shipped
off to China within weeks of the collapse? The handling of the World
Trade Center rubble almost mirrors that of the Oklahoma City Alfred
P. Murrah building.
After eyewitnesses reported several explosions
and original newscasts detailed the recovery of second and third
explosive devices, the government declared that there was just one
bomb and the remains of the building were professionally demolished
by
Controlled Demolitions Inc., the same company that was first on
the scene to cart away the WTC rubble. Debris of the federal
building was then carted off to a private landfill and guarded 24
hours a day by
Wackenhut private security. Nothing to hide there
then, eh?
The
FEMA team that investigated why the towers collapsed was headed
by Dr. W. Gene Corley, the same individual the government called
upon to whitewash the Waco fire enquiry and the Oklahoma City
bombing.
Fire Engineering, the oldest firefighting magazine in the world,
called the World Trade Center investigation a “half-baked farce” and
begged that steel from the site be preserved. The piece by Bill
Manning, editor of the 125-year-old monthly that frequently
publishes technical studies of major fires, also says the steel from
the site should be preserved so investigators can examine what
caused the collapse.
“Did they throw away the locked doors from the
Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at
the Happy Land social club fire? ... That’s what they’re doing at
the World Trade Center,” the editorial says. “The destruction and
removal of evidence must stop immediately.”9
Ben Fountain, a
financial analyst who worked on the 47th floor of the south tower,
told People Magazine that there had been several evacuations of the
WTC towers in the weeks before September 11. This was the perfect
opportunity for bombs to be placed and later detonated via remote
control.
Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of
Mining and Technology, is a former director of the Energetic
Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies
explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings,
aircraft and other structures. Hours after the collapse of the twin
towers, Romero stated that the event resembled a professional
demolition using bombs placed at strategic points within the
building.
The collapse of the buildings appears “too methodical” to
be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, said
Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of
Mining and Technology.
“My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes
hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside
the buildings that caused the towers to collapse,” Romero said.10
Romero went on to point out that many terrorist attacks often
feature a second, less noticeable but more deadly event that does
most of the damage. The initial event, in this case the shocking
scene of planes slamming into buildings, is in essence a
diversionary tactic.
In an amazing turnaround, Romero reversed his position just ten
days later and told journalists that the jet fuel had caused the
collapse. This was after official sources and television specials
pounded on the jet fuel theory until it became accepted fact.
9
‘Firefighter Mag Raps 9/11 Probe’ – New York Daily News – January 4
2002 – available at
http://www.cam.net.uk/home/Nimmann/peace/explosions.htm
10
‘Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says’ - Olivier
Uyttebrouck – Albuquerque Journal – September 11 2001 – available at
http://propagandamatrix.com/Fire_Not_Extra_Explosives_Doomed_Buildings_Expert_Says.htm
Conspiracy theorists have seized on Romero’s comments as evidence
for their argument that someone else, possibly the U.S. government,
was behind the attack on the Trade Center. Romero said he has been
bombarded with electronic mail from the conspiracy theorists. “I’m
very upset about that,” he said. “I’m not trying to say anything did
or didn’t happen.”11 The actual engineers that designed the twin
towers were baffled that an impact from a 747 could have caused the
total failure of the structures. Like Romero, some changed their
minds after the appropriate ‘pressure’ was applied from authorities,
A lead engineer who designed the World Trade Center Towers expressed
shock that the towers collapsed after being hit by passenger jets.
“I designed it for a 707 to hit it,” Lee Robertson, the project’s
structural engineer said. The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity of more
than 23,000 gallons, comparable to the 767’s 23,980-gallon fuel
capacity.
Another architect of the WTC, Aaron Swirski, lives in Israel and
spoke to Jerusalem Post Radio after the attack: “It was designed
around that eventuality to survive this kind of attack,” he said.
Hyman Brown, a University of Colorado civil engineering professor
and the World Trade Center’s
construction manager, watched in confusion as the towers came down.
“It was over-designed to
withstand almost anything including hurricanes, high winds, bombings
and an airplane hitting it,”
he said.12
Another ‘conspiracy theorist’ who reported bombs in the twin towers
was Louie
Cacchioli, a 51-year-old firefighter assigned to Engine 47 in Harlem
with over
twenty years experience. Cacchioli was part of the first rescue team
that entered
the south tower after Flight 175 struck. He told People Magazine,
“I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to
get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went
off. We think there was bombs set in the building.”13
Cacchioli has
privately told journalists that he was threatened to keep quiet and
now refuses to do any interviews.
Kim White had an office on the 80th floor of WTC 1. She reported,
We got down as far as the 74th floor, and someone there pulled us
into their office. They had a
TV on, and we saw that a plane had crashed into the building. Then
there was another explosion,
so we left again by the stairwell.14
11 ‘Fire, Not Extra Explosives, Doomed Buildings, Expert Says’ –
John Fleck - Albuquerque Journal – September 21 2001- available at
http://propagandamatrix.com/Fire_Not_Extra_Explosives_Doomed_Buildings_Expert_Says.htm
12 ‘Eyewitness Reports Persist Of Bombs At WTC Collapse’ –
Christopher Bollyn – American Free Press – December 2
2001 -
http://www.rense.com/general17/eyewitnessreportspersist.htm
13 ‘United in Courage’ – People Magazine – September 12 2001 –
available at
http://propagandamatrix.com/louie_cacchioli.htm
14
‘United in Courage’ – People Magazine – September 12 2001
-http://people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-2,00.html
Another eyewitness on the scene was Neil deGrasse Tyson. He is
Director of the Hayden Planetarium of the American Museum of Natural
History, which is located in New York City. He is also Vice
President of The Planetary Society.
Tyson’s apartment was only six blocks from the WTC complex and he
recorded
the unfolding events on his camcorder. Tyson states in his
eyewitness account,
As more and more and more and more and more emergency vehicles
descended on the World
Trade Center, I hear a second explosion in WTC 2, then a loud,
low-frequency rumble that
precipitates the unthinkable—a collapse of all the floors above the
point of explosion. First the
top surface, containing the helipad, tips sideways in full view.
Then the upper floors fall straight
down in a demolition-style implosion, taking all lower floors with
it, even those below the point of
the explosion.15
Nadine Keller was yet another person who heard explosions just
before the
towers collapsed.
“There was smoke everywhere. I heard the bomb and
saw
both buildings crumble like biscuits,” she told BBC News.16
Steve Evans was a BBC employee and was at the base of the south
tower when
it was hit,
“There was an explosion—I didn’t think it was an explosion—but the
base of the building shook. I felt it shake . . . then when we were
outside, the second explosion happened and then there was a series
of explosions. . . . We can only wonder at the kind of damage—the
kind of human damage—which was caused by those explosions—those
series of explosions,” he said.17
Claims of ‘ongoing investigations’
and ‘national security’ have been used to shut the lid on evidence
relating to firefighter dispatch tapes and aircraft black boxes.
Even family members of the victims were made to wait a year or more
to hear the final moments of their loved ones. How can what
firefighters said to each other on September 11 damage the national
security of the country?
In November 2002, one of the dispatch tapes was finally released to
the New
York Times. This transcript is from firefighters making their way up
the south
tower just minutes before it collapses,
Battalion Seven Chief: “Battalion Seven to Ladder 15.” “15 Irons.” Ladder 15: “Fifteen to 15 Roof and Irons.” Battalion Six Chief: “Battalion Six to command post.” 9:52 a.m. Battalion Seven Chief: “Battalion Seven to Battalion Seven Alpha.”
“Freddie, come on over. Freddie, come on over by us.” Battalion Seven Chief: “Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we’ve got two
isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with
two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones.” Ladder 15: “What stair are you in, Orio?” Battalion Seven Aide: “Seven Alpha to lobby command post.” Ladder Fifteen: “Fifteen to Battalion Seven.” Battalion Seven Chief: “... Ladder 15.” Ladder 15: “Chief, what stair you in?” Battalion Seven Chief: “South stairway Adam, South Tower.” Ladder 15: “Floor 78?” Battalion Seven Chief: “Ten-four, numerous civilians, we gonna need
two engines up here.” Ladder 15: “Alright ten-four, we’re on our
way.”18
15 ‘An Eye-Witness Account of the World Trade Center Attacks from
Neil deGrasse Tyson’ – The Planetary Society –September 12 2001 -
http://www.planetary.org/html/society/advisors/sept11account.html
16 ‘Eyewitnesses tell of horror’ – BBC – September 11 2001 -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1537500.stm
17 Ibid
18 You can listen to the
audio of this transcript at
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/wtc_tape.mp3
How can we reconcile claims of searing fires that melted steel with
the words, “…we’ve got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be
able to knock it down with two lines,”? These are not theories, they
are the words of the brave firefighters actually inside the
buildings minutes before they collapsed.
Furthermore, even if we accept the notion that jet fuel caused the
collapse of the north and south towers, how do we explain the
perfect implosion of WTC Building 7, which wasn’t even hit by
anything save a small amount of flying debris? The building
collapsed at 5:25pm, seven hours after the north tower collapsed.
Photographs of the building taken at 3pm show two small pockets of
fire on the 7th and 12th floors. There was little smoke and rescue
vehicles and onlookers stand just across the road – there was no
indication whatsoever and no reason for the subsequent collapse.
Some suggest diesel fuel and emergency generators inside the
building caught fire but FEMA admitted in their own report that
recovered diesel tanks remained intact after the collapse.
FIG 6.6
[CAPTION: Building 7 just hours before its
demolition-like collapse
– in the shadow of the building across the
street we can see just two small fires on the 7th and 12th floors]
Just moments after Flight 175 struck the south tower, CNN captured
footage of a huge plume of smoke rising from the base of WTC
building 6 – the U.S. Customs building. Luckily by this time all the
employees had evacuated but the building suffered intense fires
and was left with a crater down its center, but it didn’t collapse,
CNN’s Public Affairs Department confirmed that the explosion shown
in the footage occurred immediately after the second plane had
crashed into the South Tower. When asked if the footage was taken at
9:04 a.m., the CNN archivist said “that’s correct.”
When asked if CNN could offer any explanation about what might have
caused the blast that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the
foreground, the archivist said: “We can’t figure it out.”19 Concrete
proof that something other than jet fuel was responsible for the
destruction of the twin towers came when pools of molten steel were
discovered in the basement of the towers weeks after their collapse,
Although the energy source for these incredibly hot areas has yet to
be explained, New York seismometers recorded huge bursts of energy,
which caused unexplained seismic “spikes” at the beginning of each
collapse.
These spikes suggest that massive underground explosions may have
literally knocked the towers off their foundations, causing them to
collapse.
In the basements of the collapsed towers, where the 47 central
support columns connected with the bedrock, hot spots of “literally
molten steel” were discovered more than a month after the collapse.
Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the
surface, in an oxygen starved environment, could explain how these
crucial structural supports failed.20 Columbia University’s
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory is 21 miles north of the WTC site.
Seismographs recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake during the
10-second collapse of the South Tower at 9:59:04 and a 2.3 quake
during the 8-second collapse of the North Tower at 10:28:31.
Immediately before the collapse of the two towers, identical
seismic spikes occurred which dwarfed the actual energy jolt
registered by the falling of the debris, These unexplained “spikes”
in the seismic data lend credence to the theory that massive
explosions at the base of the towers caused the collapses.
A “sharp spike of short duration” is how seismologist Thorne Lay of
University of California at Santa Cruz told AFP an underground
nuclear explosion appears on a seismograph. The two unexplained
spikes are more than 20 times the amplitude of the other seismic
waves associated with the collapses and occurred in the East-West
seismic recording as the buildings began to fall.
19 ‘Unexplained 9-11 Explosion at WTC Complex’ – Christopher Bollyn
– American Free Press – July 14 2002 -http://www.americanfreepress.net/07_14_02/Unexplained_9-11_/unexplained_9-11_.html
20 ‘NEW SEISMIC DATA REFUTES OFFICIAL EXPLANATION’ – Christopher Bollyn – American Free Press –September 3 2002 -
http://www.americanfreepress.net/09_03_02/NEW_SEISMIC_/new_seismic_.html
21 Ibid
Experts cannot explain why the seismic waves peaked before the
towers actually hit the ground.21 The notion that advanced
laser/particle beam weaponry was used to bring down the towers
correlates with footage of the radio antenna on the north tower
literally disintegrating into thin air as the building begins to
collapse. The fact that over half of the victims’ bodies were never
recovered because they ‘evaporated’ is also consistent with this
explanation.
We will probably never find out why the towers collapsed because the
government has clamped down on every piece of evidence under
national security and the rest has been declared ‘destroyed or
missing’. The thousands of families who simply seek closure in
finding out what happened to their loved ones continue to be
insulted by the authorities and offered pitiful sums of money to
stop asking questions. This should come as no surprise in light of
previous events.
The criminals are merely trying to cover their
tracks.
Back to Contents
Back
to The 9/11 Events
|