AlienMind
The Verdants

Starting a New Universe Cycle

12.09.2005
 

If, as some hyperversals assert, they’ve been through the mobilizations necessary to effect a “new” universal cycle, it would have required a number of hard decisions. For example, all aliens intent on surviving such a feat would likely have had to retreat to remote regions of space before manipulating all known black holes (conceivably leaving the “mass” of some black holes to be used for structure within, and navigation into, the next universe cycle).

Advanced aliens wouldn’t wait until the last moment to do so. Instead, they would have to prepare far in advance. They would have to time their actions to reserve enough energy/time within a given universe cycle to be able to initiate a succeeding cycle. That would require vast sums of energy/time (if we assume an integrated value for mass/energy and time, as does Bearden).

Participating populations would need to coordinate their last moments within the old universe. They would all have to move out to deep space before initiating a new cycle because it would be hot and dangerous near old concentrations of mass during the first moments. Some populations wouldn’t be ready for such a change and might perish because they’re either out of touch, or too primitive to be trusted with hyper-advanced technology.

In short, the initiation of a new universe cycle would involve tight security considerations. No upstart group of lesser populations could be allowed to initiate a new universe cycle independent of, or before, the larger collective action. Imagine the nature of the security necessary to monitor all potential interlopers. Although most upstarts could never achieve the vast network needed to even begin on such a feat, more advanced populations, including all previous cycle(s) populations, would have to be on the watch. They might pre-empt communications between younger populations, which could cause resentment. Basic accords would be necessary, all in the name of the larger ecology.

Much like the detachment that comes of war, the cold calculation required to effect a new universe cycle could be emotionally scarring. To initiate a new universe cycle might require a collective decision to exclude certain undesirables. If so, what would be the criteria for inclusion? How many could be included? Common sense suggests that all populations would have to greatly reduce their numbers before a new universe cycle could be initiated. That would be touchy and would strain the social fabric of participating populations. On the other hand, after initiating a new cycle, a kind of kinship would be kindled among transitioning populations, yet would be offset by the numbing detachment of having excluded certain others. Detachment of the sort wouldn’t abate quickly, but would linger as a cultural artifact, a shared assumption among various hyperversals. Newly evolved populations like our own might see this as a cold shoulder, a deeply withdrawn, if not insular set of assumptions on the hyperversals’ part. By the time they initiated a new cycle, hyperversals would have spent billions of years monitoring a vastly larger mix of populations all across the universe, some of whom (like the Verdants) would have manipulated others toward mass extinctions.

In short, the best and most intelligent sensitivities of some hyperversals would be challenged by the cruelties of their larger circumstance. Ironically, those are exactly the kind of conditions that corrupt leadership tries to take advantage of. It would be dangerous to trust the lives of so many with but one universal regime. Instead, we can assume that peaceful diversity would be safer, due to diversity of origin and diversity of supercluster neighborhoods, assuming, of course, that hyperversals see the same, far-flung kind of universe that we do. Their technology allows for a closer interconnectedness.

The community of mind assumptions of a given hyperversal population might be difficult for some humans to understand. Some humans may wonder: how could numerous aliens share thoughts in a merged, community of mind manner? How could they all get along? From the old human perspective, that might seem strange, yet if one were to begin, instead, from a community of mind perspective (being able to jointly share thoughts freely), the fearful, if not manipulative pitfalls of concretized individuality might seem even stranger. Concretized notions of individuality would seem bizarre, if not primitive---vastly less intelligent.

To date, there have been specific -X3 statements about end-of-cycle distinctions to be made regarding the distant future. The -X3’s have asserted that they, and other hyperversals, are the populations who can best make necessary distinctions to prepare for a future universe cycle. They seem to assume that recently evolved aliens may not know how to plan correctly. The -X3’s argue that populations must be reduced and must be able to merge and cohabit in order to effect a future universe cycle. To some readers, this may sound premature, as though it needn’t be a concern, at the moment. To hyperversals, however, it is never too soon to begin planning correctly.

Apparently, hyperversals must advise and prepare others for an epic, end-of-cycle mobilization in order to prepare for the next cycle. They must be able to clock the remaining time and energy of entire superclusters. Refugees from galaxies like those swallowed by M-87 must be accommodated elsewhere, and, toward the end of the current cycle, hyperversals may have to time the move of all participating populations out to interspatial locations away from concentrated mass locations (like galaxies) in order to ride out the action. As a result, -X3’s tend to judge others now in such epic terms, far in advance of future mobilizations.

Again, there is the question about who will know in advance that a new cycle is about to be initiated. Judging by the scale of the universe that we now see, we can probably assume that a re-cycling event would affect all living inhabitants in the same way that the event(s) that we call the “Big Bang” affected the current contours of the universe (although it may not have been a Big Bang event, as we know it). Who will be where in deep space at such a time? It’s an enormously complex question. Hyperversals who are more advanced than the -X3’s ( “-“ for negative energy users, “X” for hyperversals, and “3” for the fact that they don’t merely work via a positive-negative energy scheme, but appear to have refined a third, more complicated dynamic) pose a hopeful prospect, in that the -X3’s don’t seem to have a comprehensive grasp of some aspects of the universal dilemma at this stage in the -X3’s evolution.


Within a Hyperversal Community

How many aliens are there among the -X3 population? One hyperversal stated that the -X3’s numbers number either 1.3x the number of the Verdants, or, if the remark were to be construed differently, the -X3’s may number 1.3 quadrillion individuals. In either case, the -X3’s are numerous. Given such numbers, it may be safe to assume that the -X3’s are limited to our part of Virgo, if not the entire Virgo cluster. They are unabashedly mega-population in
their outlook. Nonetheless, marginally more independent hyperversals air critiques that suggest there is good, safe precedent for humans who choose to remain independent of the Verdant-IFSP mega-population. There is definitely diversity among hyperversals.

At a later juncture, a hyperversal stated that more programmatic mega-populations are 1.3 times as numerous (in total number of individuals) than are smaller, or independent aggregations.

*It may only be coincidence that the 1.3 figure matches the more loosely-stated ratio of the -X3’s compared to Verdants. Part of the -X3’s ambiguity about their numbers has to do with the fact that potentially offensive new populations are considered less dangerous if they have been absorbed by a larger collective, hence the -X3’s don’t want us to blithely assume that independence is the way to go. However, there are complex, universe-wide ecological considerations that might be hard to discern were we to take the 1.3-to-1 ratio too literally. It’s a prickly subject, given the Verdants’ expansion in our local vicinity.

On the one hand, no one wants to encourage Verdants to think that they can simply spawn without constraint in order to be a power, of sorts, in our intergalactic neighborhood. On the other hand, hyperversals consistently state that hyperversals learned to moderate their numbers. Each hyperversal mega-population appears to be tasked with monitoring the ecology of a number of current cycle mega-populations. Hence, a given hyperversal population like the -X3’s may be less in number than are current cycle aliens, yet hyperversals know that current cycle aliens who fail to moderate will suffer a lack of resources and a lack of good graces in the future, when they will have to contend for habitable replacement planets. They could even be left out. They need to be taught to moderate, yet conflict must be avoided.

For those who might wonder whether a population like the Verdants could begin to threaten the entire Virgo cluster by overgrowing it, the prospect is dim. There are too many competitors, all of whom have to deal with major, great-scale crises involving other populations. Common sense within any galaxy would compel moderation. In the Verdant case, we must question whether the Verdants have become a kind of problem child, in a sense, analogous to a badly behaved kindergarten class in which the teacher (the -X3’s) can only manage the mayhem, rather than impose tight controls. Imagine an entire universe of similar dilemmas.

However, given their more advanced technology, hyperversals can out-stage upstarts like the Verdants.

Hyperversals communicate and interact on a scale that Verdants can only imagine. They ultimately control when the next cycle will be initiated.

To date, hyperversals have been cryptic and not particularly forthcoming about some aspects of their history. They sometimes suggest that their response to inquiry about their background is answered within a subtly expanded awareness surrounding the consideration. In other words, they don’t chew on the words one at a time, which leaves some humans wondering. Of course, hyperversals may think that if a human doesn’t quite assimilate their replies, then he or she may not be ready to comprehend them, in the first place.
 

The sharpest criticism of the -X3’s is that their strategy appears to be Malthusian. Humans have questioned whether the -X3’s have a tendency to think too much about themselves and how they will be affected if too many current cycle aliens try to make it into the next universe cycle. Indeed, for all we know, this same kind of dialogue has gone on for billions of years. It appears to be a process of give and take.

In response to concerns about their strategy of competing tensions regarding humankind, -X3’s reply that the roundness we see in them (their tendency to round all considerations up to the universal level or down to zero, the absence of passion) is a kind of non-viciousness. Meanwhile, some humans will see it as an insular, if not elitist distancing that some hyperversals fail to recognize in their own, peculiar way. One obvious critique is that the -X3’s divisive policies, i.e. their coordination with the Verdants, are framed to thwart broad, universal scale interactions by current cycle aliens---a pre-emptive strategy, of sorts. The -X3’s reply that they need to work with all populations, including some offenders, in order to steer everyone toward a sustainable ecology, hence we’ve seen some hyperversals act in liaison with the Verdants, while, at the same time, other hyperversals are sharply critical of the Verdants.

There have been disjointed, if not disturbing moments during human-hyperversal interactions, to date. For example, there’s a recurring argument that revolves around the following: Some hyperversals, who argue for immersion within the one-ness and cohesion of their sub-sector of the universe, say that humans need to sacrifice in order to bring themselves up to minimum standard. They say humans will more quickly become healthy, ecological non-sexuals, if
we do so. Meanwhile, there’s a catch: hyperversals who tend to lump all consideration into the one, singular notion of their sub-sector can suffer defects of mind that they don’t quite see beyond. Those hyperversals and their genetically engineered intermediaries who linger at the margins of acceptability, who are tasked with doing conflict-ridden security work toward such “one-ness,” tend to bias the process by seeing through a murky filter.

You may wonder: what does that mean? How might it actually occur, in real life? Here’s how: A hyperversal whose must track Verdant manipulations in this vicinity can become coarse, if not arrogant, compared to more healthy hyperversals. Humans have witnessed just that.

*It helps to remember that we live on an outlying fringe of the Virgo supercluster. More concentrated, urbane populations deep within Virgo may be of more interest to hyperversals. As a result, a regime like that of the Verdants may have gone too long without correction. However, if I’m not mistaken, some hyperversals are aware that it’s dangerous to allow Verdants to dunder in and militarize our vicinity, to thumb their noses at the populations of this and other galaxies.

Generally speaking, when older, more experienced hyperversals try to steer lesser populations toward a higher standard, they may, at times, rationalize what they do in terms of cold perspectives of old (when some societies from the previous universe cycle didn’t survive). In the end, although hyperversals have more advanced science, they tend to live in isolation from recently evolved populations. They have legitimate reasons for obscuring themselves. They don’t want current cycle aliens to grab up and copy their technology. They don’t want unqualified upstarts trying to initiate a new universe cycle.

So, older hyperversals use hybrid and other intermediaries to interact with recently evolved aliens. Based upon what we’ve seen, such intermediaries are smarter and have larger brains than aliens like the Verdants or the grays. They live within more advanced technology.

Although sentient, some hyperversals appear to have engineered certain “emotional” genes out of themselves, hence they can watch Verdants manipulate crimes against humanity without feeling much. In part, this is due to the fact that hyperversals live at great remove in terms of custom, habit and experience. Hyperversals, and their intermediaries who do security work can be inwardly cynical yet idealistic regarding the contorted affairs of lesser aliens.

So, where does that leave us? We’re now learning that vast numbers of hyper-advanced aliens (hyperversals) manipulate and steer lesser, current cycle aliens toward better ecology yet sometimes make mistakes. For example, hyperversals and their genetically-engineered intermediaries may assume that human error is genetically based, or that extremes of human violence and greed represent solely human shortcomings. Meanwhile, we have evidence that human events have been directly manipulated by IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) operatives.

Due to hyperversal skepticism of the Verdant IFSP, hyperversals sometimes intervene in a messy, Verdant-related situation, then withdraw and “discuss” it among themselves telepathically, using mind-activated technology. Such discussions can, at times, degrade into diagrammatic, instantaneous echoings, rather than thoughtful conversation. As a result, mistakes are made and people may suffer. This is an important aspect of human-hyperversal interactions.

*Later, we’ll discuss the ironies of diagrammatic resonance in place of thoughtfulness, a distinction that cuts across, and separates some offenders from more thoughtful others.

Although widely traveled and accustomed to studying “lesser” aliens, some hyperversal societies are relatively stagnant. They may change little during our lifetimes, while human society changes rapidly. So, from our perspective, it may at times seem as though hyperversals fail to comprehend the dangers of our predicament. They aren’t as vulnerable as we are.

On the other hand, one key aspect of hyperversal life should favor a better understanding of our situation. If, as hyperversals insist, the universe has been re-cycled at least once, then it should have been re-cycled before that, perhaps many times over and over again. Humans have heard subtle talk in this regard. This suggests that successively more advanced hyperversals exist and should, by now, be capable of ghosting the latest generation of hyperversals in order to tend to what they do. Being less burdened by the need to herd newly evolved aliens toward a basic universal ecology, older generations of hyperversals may have preserved their vital sensitivities. They should be able to sympathize with decent humans.

*One hyperversal (who apparently derived from the last universe cycle) suggested hyperverversals from successively previous cycles may be even more prone to condemn a potentially dangerous new population of sexuals. It was a sobering moment.

What do we know about hyperversal society, their interaction and inter-communications? Over time, I’ve witnessed some of their intercommunications and critiques of one another. The tone and character of intercommunications is subtle, couched in terms of deep awareness of multiply inter-dimensioned basics---fine and sometimes elusive details that always begin from a premise of basic, universal hyper-dynamics. Their science is more complex and is premised on a better, basic understanding of the universe. It’s as though they begin from a greater variety of understandings--across a variety of different horizons, so to speak.

Nonviolence among hyperversals appears to be the understood rule, although political and cultural disagreements definitely occur. In some such cases, each “side” may try to assert a larger, more enduring premise for his or her actions. Nonetheless, in a case like that of the Verdant IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) intervention here on Earth, dissenting hyperversals, or, in some cases, categorically more advanced hyperversals, feel free to assert that humans need to know basic details about the Verdants. Such hyperversals offer complex yet easily understood critiques of Verdant excess and the Verdant resort to manipulated violence (violence that is framed to seem indirect). Complex statements about human feelings and a human kind of existential predicament are offered. Sometimes, a hyperversal will make a statement (verbal, graphic and deep with subtle details) about a typical human’s daily work or social predicaments, essentially showing that hyperversals have some of the same feelings. This is done deliberately.

When humans discuss a topic, we often reference a variety of national and cultural viewpoints. Hyperversals communicate in ways that suggest a vastly larger awareness. For example, in one case mention was made about the Markarian Chain of galaxies deep within the center of the Virgo supercluster. The best human representation is but a photo, but the hyperversal representation was much deeper and detailed in ways that I could only begin to appreciate--showing a number of different (integrated) aspects of large elliptical galaxies that involved mergers of entire galaxies, some of them ongoing. Imagine seeing a telepathic map of the politics, dynamics and culture of Europe for example, if you had never seen such a thing. Many of the details would be there, yet you wouldn’t have enough background information to absorb it all. In other words, mitigating against any outward vulgarity in hyperversal disagreements are the fantastically complex, multicultural, historical and scientific understandings that hyperversals share, even if they aren’t always part of the same universal bailiwick.

Some hyperversals are keenly aware of legal implications in daily events, which suggests that they, too, are bounded by basic legal considerations. What is the basis for such legal distinctions? Is it formalized, or is it a more generic kind of convention? It’s possible that among hyperversals, law takes on a unified character, i.e. merged values for scientific, ecological, and crime-specific considerations. What does that mean? An earlier chapter describes a topological structure of mind (and language). Legal definitions based on the topology of alternate-cycle commonality can be more precise than is concretized, singular wordform (which can be propped up for deceptive misuses). When legal definitions are fractionally interlinked so that you can see them all at the same time, they are easier to comprehend. So, among hyperversals and other aliens, unified values and definitions help to integrate entire categories of meaning in order to make sense of the universe. This allows for a greater back and forth conversation between more ideas so that they can agree on intermediate values more effectively. When hyperversals communicate, they do so with multiple implications---topologically.

We can easily imagine a universal code against murder, violence, and destruction, yet we can also see that a population like the Verdants may try to shrug off certain universal laws by arguing in favor of Verdant authority in a physical location--a departure that can degrade into petty, if not infantile ideas about the universe. For example:

what rules apply when one galaxy overuses negative energy and speeds the universal clock, thus depleting universal resources and shortening the life of surrounding galaxies?

*Such a problem may have arisen when a –X3-related hyperversal reportedly responded to a disturbance to his large elliptical galaxy, causing him to leave his (loosely construed) “retirement garden” to attend to the matter. The problem appears to have been Verdant overuse of negative energy and delta t (the change of time by use of electrogravity and negative energy).

When cited for violating the intergalactic ecology, Verdants may offer a variety of tacky excuses. For example, they may pose the IFSP’s lesser conscript planets as a kind of window dressing to cover for the Verdant population explosion. Cases of the sort underscore the need for larger conventions and carefully metered constraints on any given population.

Is there gender among hyperversals? Apparently there is, but among non-sexual populations the distinction isn’t as graphic as it is for a human. I’ve listened to some hyperversals who seem to know the feelings and impulses of sexuals from a subjective perspective. Nonetheless, hyper-advanced science can go in a variety of directions. It can verge on seemingly unfathomable new categories and then assume a different kind of character. For a more earthly analogy, consider the following. When humans become honest enough to observe and respect the intricate logic that already exists in Earth’s ecology, then human science will advance categorically. Hyperversals engage in a different kind of conversation with nature and a re-cycling universe. There may already be a more advanced order of being that they, too, must observe and respect more carefully in order to better themselves.

For hyperversals, the notion of species may stretch the old human idea of possibilities. One hyperversal says that hyperversals tend to be non-sexual, which is encouraging. Imagine what the universe would be like, over time, were they all sexuals. I assume, as appears to be the case, that “at present,” hyperversals may be more modest in number than are our current cycle populations, yet hyperversals are far more capable. The problem with making assumptions about hyperversals’ numbers is that our notion of time is definitely not the limit elsewhere, even though we’re beginning to understand the nature of time and the hyper-dynamics of “negative” and alternate cycle energy.

When hyperversals can both see and ascertain that you understand their terms of existence, the basic universal assumptions of their lives, they are more sympathetic—especially if you prove that you live by similar standards. Some hyperversals have nurtured and have regularly helped me (and others) develop a larger understanding in ways that I can never sufficiently express gratitude for. As a result of some of their efforts, in tandem with those of other neighboring aliens, we now have a preliminary critique of the Verdants. Over time, we will probably refine that critique to acknowledge that, even though we may not agree to be part of the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets), some of its efforts will, in the end, have helped to evolve us.

It’s all part of a very large drama involving numerous galaxy groups. One hyperversal explicitly stated that Verdants have taken some places in at least six galaxy groups surrounding our own Andromeda-M33-Milky Way group. Given that we’re all being drawn closer to the Virgo cluster, we will must coexist with Verdants, but hopefully will do so on mutually more evolved terms. Meanwhile, hyperversals communicate and exchange information on a universal scale. In comparison, the Verdant case is small-scale, strange as that may sound to some. At intervals, we actually hear limited mention about events deep within Virgo, and also mention of the interaction of various superclusters.

At one point, one hyperversal said that the (boy in the bubble) –X3 (“-“ for negative energy users, “X” for hyperversals, and “3” for the fact that they don’t merely work via a positive-negative energy scheme, but appear to have refined a third, more complicated dynamic) who I and others have communicated with is like I am in comparison to all of humanity: more advanced in some ways, but not broadly representative of the aggregate in other ways. At a different time, a hyperversal said that the human image of the –X3’s only goes about as far as that of Aunt B. of Andy of Mayberry does in comparison to the rest of the United States (yes, those were the words).

At times, the politics of larger interactions can strain and distort hyperversal aliens’ approach to humankind. Sometimes is seems as though a given hyperversal group’s desire to control others is equal to their attention to the basic ecology. Moments of the sort involve psychological and structural ironies, some of which may have little to do with humans, more to do with the history and experience of very long-lived hyperversals. In other words, humans are seen through the filter of political ironies involving other aliens in, or affecting, our galaxy group. We may also be mistaken for having the same tendencies as did our less-educated, war-like predecessors, some of whom may have been marginally manipulated (at some remove) through various off-world interventions.

It helps to imagine how it might be for an entirely different, advanced species to look down on strange “hair-heads,” as one hyperversal humorously suggested we might be seen at a glance. For an alien who has lived thousands, if not millions of years, the current human generation may seem transitory and uncertain.

When hyperversal control freaks dunder in and begin to manipulate, it helps to remember that any and all
individuals in the universe are capable of error. I sometimes note one error in particular, actually a bundling of
errors. It has to do with the fact that the entire universe is the only definitive “singular” quantity. It can’t be observed
as a whole, but can only be modeled as a relatively faint and subtle near-whole. When a given regime or group of
manipulators peers out at all the rest they sometimes make the mistake of assuming that they definitively
encompass the entire universe. When other competing structures do the same, we see a fairly simple, but
dangerous irony: the one group’s structured observation (modeled as nearly-singular) is distorted and amplified by
the second group’s structured observation(s). In other words, it’s the mathematic equivalent of STRUCTURE x
STRUCTURE, which is prone to distortion and error. Rather than divide their observations into the larger
commonality, they multiply their error, instead. Hence we see too many whole-numbered misconceptions, not
enough humility and forbearance.

When one limited group of hyperversal manipulators tries to lord it over a large variety of other distorted structures
(i.e. when hyperversals lead Verdants into doing convenient dirty work), the result is cold, cruel and destructive.
Even among the best of all aliens there are structural distortions, but among the most corrupt and materialistic alien
interactions the distortions are categorically worse. This is further complicated by old-age syndromes and the
genetic elimination of emotion, in some cases. The best that any newly-evolving population can possibly do is
simply recognize that it’s safer and better to not immerse in the contorted maelstrom of offending aliens’ doings.
Instead, it’s better to cautiously observe such offenders from a distance---being careful to work toward a finer, more
considerate multiversal continuum in which such offenders lapse into “singular” distortions away from the more
evolved majority (although they must be tended to).

When Verdants and their cohorts dunder in, disastrously overpopulated and aggressive, if not destructive of entire
planets, humans need to step back to study the phenomenon carefully and not succumb to the bully temptation to
leap in and trade away human sovereignty, nearby planets, and more (especially when this galaxy needs to reduce
population because it will merge in the future). Instead, we need to remember that part of the human elite is already
corrupted and disposed to waste the lives of billions, to squander the planet’s ecology in exchange for a parrot’s
perch on some puny IFSP starship. Their first strategy is to say that “we” can cut a deal with the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets), that, in fact, they already have! A tiny human elite will say that certain technologies can be “ours” if we just play along (even though the deal is bought with the blood of innocents and funded through narcotics trafficking by government shadow agencies).

To survive in a decent way, we can’t wait for the worst to happen. Instead, we must act on a global scale, not merely
within one nation. Change of the sort cannot be purchased in a store, nor made solely on the internet.

Alien math and science clearly indicate that the way of the future, the most intelligent and enduring choices, are
finer and more subtle, hence more universally capable and sustainable. We don’t need to withdraw from all alien
interactions, but we do need to raise public awareness and discuss all alien issues more widely before we become a
kind of IFSP slave-market. When the majority says No! and will not let an offending minority destroy their planet,
when government is within the people who won’t play along with the IFSP’s bizarre “Earth Changes” strategy, then
the old regime will grind to a halt. Some “direct operatives” will try to escape, but for now, they want to squelch all
news of their crimes, to silence those public figures who could expose them at any moment. To survive, the
conscientious must take risks and seek a wider audience. This is not a time to hide from such realities and merely
pamper oneself or one’s own small family.

There are preliminary indications, direct statements by hyperversals that those hyperversals who support the Verdant expansion are working on but a group of three elliptical galaxies. This may be reference to the galaxies Centaurus A (click right image), our Milky Way-Andromeda elliptical-to-be, and one other [i.e. possibly N5102, also known as The Lenticular Galaxy (image  left) which is actually a dwarf elliptical galaxy in the Centaurus A galaxy group - where Verdants originate. *N5102 is only 0.214 times the apparent size of Andromeda].

In other words, competing hyperversals can see a logic in throwing off the IFSP’s scheme here, which has limited, if not conditional backing, at best. The hyperversal "security section" cited for working on the three ellipticals may be the cosmic equivalent of a sewer squad containing some offenders who, in yet another twist of the universal ecology, must be bundled together AWAY from more gentle, constructive others. When it is all seen from above, we can see that the most dangerous elements can't be allowed to just wander off wherever they want to go. Ugly as it may seem, in some ways they are all part of the same basic tendency.

At times, hyperversals caught within that limited, Verdant-related “event horizon” of sorts try to make me slack off and not continue some of my rigorous, probably first-ever (native) human cultivation of certain hyper-dynamics. Such hyperversals routinely intervene to try and change the human community discussion/telepathic topic when we outline their basic mode and concepts too explicitly—as if they want to change the subject. Admittedly, diversions of the sort involve various motives---some hyperversals fear that the wrong humans may learn too much, and others simply want to obscure their own, misguided doings. Diversions of the sort tend to be abrupt and coarse in character--involving offenders who seem to be bundled into the Verdant-manipulated terracides, and more.

To some readers, this may seem like a cold slap in the face, but it is a fact of life. The old politics of the 20^th century are gone. The politics of the 21^st century involve a variety of alien populations. It’s better to know, than to be deceived for not having inquired.

Taken as a whole, hyperversals have evolved away from lower-order animal impulses. Nonetheless, some of the
following may discomfort those who shy away from explicit investigative reporting. Perhaps it’s best to describe what
is about to be said in terms of a two (or more) sided analogy:

• On the one hand, in order to escape being caught within the crunch of that singularly hell-like event horizon of destroyers and extreme violators, we need to be honest, studied, increasingly more humble and sensitive.

• On the other hand, it’s nice to know that if we persevere and help to re-generate a more gently abiding and beautiful universe, we can be part of a larger, hyper-intelligent community.

The physics of the universe allow such a community to endure for us, whether we recognize it within our seemingly isolated “physical” bodies, or not. Mass destruction leads to a dead end, a misery that mass offenders pretend not to recognize. Meanwhile, a better way is ever being regenerated, yet it takes effort and commitment.

No one in this universe is immune, in such regard. You won’t be accepted and integrated into higher orders of mind
if you don’t behave accordingly. You won’t be a match.

It’s that simple; alternate cycle hyper-dynamics can be ordered according to such distinctions (within certain limitations).

Sometimes, it seems as though the –X3’s lack of pending concern about the doings of their security sections prevents them from acting effectively, as we must (being more vulnerable). Will they try to thwart humankind’s attempts to interact with close neighbors? Will they try to toss bones into our efforts, rationalizing it all in their own, peculiar terms? If their (presumed) trade with Verdants is too comfy, we may suffer, as a result. (Some hyperversals retort that our brush with the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) will force us to expand our awareness BEFORE we dunder off and attempt to portray neighboring aliens as potential enemies. After our brush with the Verdants, our closest neighbors will seem mild in comparison and we’ll be better informed about alien basics.)

The –X3’s argue that a merged (more greatly interacting) quality is necessary for our future survival, yet one critique is that the –X3’s divisive politics and cutoffs (as they affect Earth) are framed to thwart universal-scale interactions by newcomer aliens. The first cold gatekeepers (i.e. that “security section” tending to three ellipticals) may try to obscure their own manipulations and the facts of a larger, more considerate diversity. A good, relatively advanced person can see past them, but a killer-regime accolyte will be tempted to jump in with the worst (as seems to be the Verdant strategy). The sewer squad will “take care of them,” ironically.

• Are hyperversals’ pre-emptive behaviors intended to avert reckless newcomers before they can do too much short-
  term damage?

• Does a larger universal convention already exist regarding such offenders?

• In other words, are the Verdants a small-scale balance of powers pawn, or are they population offenders being steered toward confrontations that may help to moderate Verdant wastefulness?

As is usually the case, the truth probably lies in both scenarios (and probably more).

Nevertheless, sometimes is seems as though the –X3’s and related others are dancing around the obvious: they’re implicated in a number of staged-as-though-IFSP communications, and the Verdants know it (although Verdants aren’t equal to it). On the other hand, such hyperversals have a breadth of perspective that the Verdants simply don’t; they’re better in various ways. So, caught on the one hand looking bad for doing run-on, crappy routines ad nauseum, while also criticizing the Verdants on the other hand, they don’t want us to dwell on the details. In all fairness, by tending to what populations like the Verdants do, hyperversals can tease out the details so that potential victim populations can see it all more clearly. This, in turn, lets Verdants know that they’re being monitored.

*In the past, certain Verdants have let slip that they see the hyperversal community constraint as suffocating, at times.

Meanwhile, the survival of life on Earth hangs in the balance, in part due to the IFSP’s high velocity intervention.
Ironically, after so many have died as a result of the IFSP’s “direct operatives’” schemes (see the history of those
noted above), the tendency of IFSP strategists is to act as though the deaths of human innocents makes them, the
remote manipulators of such deaths, holy, in some strange way. We see this kind of crap in human politics, also.

*I discuss the Verdant case at intervals because it’s highly political and is oft-mentioned by hyperversals. It helps to illustrate alien thinking on a number of subjects.

Speaking more generally, one hyperversal made the following caricatured comment, of sorts: At a juncture when
hyperversal policy was in question, he showed a large expanse of space, in the middle of which was a huge, soft
blue-gray orb-space (hyperversal community) that dominated the entire scene---and, out in further reaches of
space, revolving in a neat little circle around the central orb-space were small orb-spaces bobbing along, one after
the other, like little boats in a bathtub (i.e. humans and other aliens who evolve in the current universe cycle). The
comment, of sorts, was shown as a kind of critique of the mono-mindset of overly regime-minded hyperversals.

Over time, along with others, I’ve observed Verdants defer to –X3’s and related hyperversals, smoothly cognizant of
their existence. In fact, when pressured and criticized regarding IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) “direct operatives’” crimes against humanity, one Verdant impulsively blurted out that the Verdants’ strategy had been cleared with a hyperversal population.

The irony is that Verdants may, in part, have smoothed the way for their expansion scheme by offering biological
and other materials in trade with one (or a few) local group(s) of hyperversals.

The fact that hyperversals reportedly contacted Verdants to cue them as to Earth’s location suggests that there is
some technological connection, if not a trading interaction between such hyperversals and the Verdants. We can
assume, of course, that the –X3’s need large quantities of resources, which can’t be reaped from empty space.
They need diverse genetic and manufactured materials, plus minerals. Given that Verdants have the most
opportunistic and easily manipulated (large) regime on this fringe of Virgo, the –X3’s likely trade with them, at least
on some scale. This poses the ghastly irony of the IFSP’s allegedly slave-like use of lesser aliens to do the IFSP’s
dirty work, mining and processing of materials, which are then, in at least some part, skimmed off of the top by –X3’s.

In other words, the worst (but not all) hyperversals may think Verdants can be used to essentially steal time from, if
not eliminate, newly-evolved populations (stealing time as it relates to delta t and mass/energy).

*One advanced hyperversal suggested that Bearden’s delta t (change of time caused by electrogravity) is really a kind of “alternate t,” in a larger sense, but this involves a higher category of integration involving multiple universe cycles.

The fact that another (Verdant-abetting) group of hyperversals is here looking over the shoulder of the IFSP’s manipulated violence scheme may be due to a larger order in the universe in which all offending parties move in train—in a deceptive, seemingly one-way river of time. Meanwhile, better minds can exceed such offenders, accordingly. One hyperversal suggested that after seeing certain hyperversal offenders, we’ll be able to see how hyperversals can say that the death of some planets (and species) can come back to haunt a manipulator. Ultimately, as was suggested earlier, various low order impulses may bundle into one another (away from the better kind), both as an irony of the universal ecology, and to make management of such offenders easier. More advanced aliens act in a way that isn’t just right for their time, but is best for all of time.

Sometimes, it seems as though a basic test of hyperversals’ competency is their simple vulnerability. Those who seem too smugly certain of themselves tend to be strangely weighted. The gravity of their presumption is almost singular, weighted (in an E.T. way) toward their physical being, or regime. It’s as though they seem TOO condensed, when, instead, more well-dimensioned minds communicate out into the universe, less confined by singular pretensions.

Rather than overgeneralize about hyperversals, I should note that callous hyperversals may represent the lowest of
their kind, those whose impulses tend to be bunched, ever so singularly, into the nearest specious scheme like that
of the Verdants, for example.

Ultimately, humans may need to be concerned about some equalitarian societies that cut themselves off from others in the universe. Some equalitarian societies live in relative luxury, although on fairly equal terms--unlike humankind’s rich vs. poor scheme at present. Hyperversals live in relatively easy, unmolested techno-splendor. They travel the universe. They get universal news, and they live for “millions” of years, according to at least one hyperversal’s report. As a result, some hyperversals can be subtly condescending ~ as if to suggest that the hell of IFSP destruction and criminality that we’re going through is intended to dissuade us of our sexuality -- for ecological reasons.

*In other words, too bad that we’ve lost control of our government, but if left as we are, humans could become a threat.

The question, from our perspective is: a threat to what, or whom? One of the most arrogant hyperversals has stated
that there is no legal order to rely upon. His drift was that humans must conform within a hierarchical kind of
schema, or perhaps perish. Meanwhile, there is a precisely defined, if not mathematical order of being in all that
happens, nearly tao-like consequences, albeit more active in character than is the traditional Taoist outlook. It’s
inconceivable that hyperversal societies don’t have carefully evolved legal structures, although some may assert
that humans haven’t signed legitimate treaties with off-world governments.

Ironically, humans who fawningly accept the dogma of the Verdant/gray IFSP don’t hear a word about hyperversals.
Instead, they hear infantile remarks about “angels” and invisible others, instead. And why do IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) aliens omit mention of hyperversals? Apparently, it’s because some Verdants in the IFSP want to play God and take the lion’s share of whatever they can get—for the Verdants, primarily. One Verdant tried to convince Phillip Krapf that Verdants are the only superpower, when, instead, they aren’t even remotely like such an entity.

*The greater order of being isn’t about power and control but interacts mutually on more highly evolved terms, irrespective of technological prowess.

Absence of sexuality among some hyperversals has made them more civilized and capable but I’ve noticed that
some can dunder into a place and, whether wittingly or not, play to an epic sense of grandeur. They can casually sit
and watch humans die by the millions, in part due to IFSP manipulations. Meanwhile, hyperversals will openly
explain what is going on, even though we can’t possibly compete with IFSP goons when our public remains
uniformed, our government hijacked and corrupted by cabal elements who, whether they know it or not, work to
divide and corrupt humankind (to the advantage of IFSP aliens). Watching from a distance, the typically detached
and aged yet “healthy” hyperversal can observe, adding his or her own, colossal sense of drama to it all---while our
planet gets trashed by a criminal regime that cuts secret deals with the IFSP.

One hyperversal remarked that such a situation can drive a planet to death, a people to slave-like desperation,
and, in the end, life has simply been extinguished. Ironically, potential problems for hyperversals will have been
eliminated.

Ours wouldn’t be the first planet to die due to a misguided intervention. Humans are getting a preliminary look at a
kind of Munchhausen’s syndrome among aliens, yet few such aliens will admit to it. Instead, they glibly suggest that
we could eliminate the evil gene or engineer our sexuality out in order to be more normal. Meanwhile, if various
government whistleblowers are correct, only a corrupt human cabal has been introduced to the genetic tools
needed to do so and they prefer to profit in order to secure themselves, rather than help humankind. Were human
science to develop an enzyme that extends human life (like the one that the Buck Institute and other scientists have
developed), big corporations would say, no, they can’t market such a thing because it would force them to pay
pensions for years beyond what they’ve planned. So, ghastly as that might sound to those who would prefer to
extend their lives, under the current regime, progress of the sort is unlikely.

We could try to paint a happy face on our exopolitical (off-world political) dilemma, as one hyperversal suggested
we do, but that would be irresponsible. Hyperversals need to hear critiques. Hyperversal aliens exist and are fallible.
We can’t treat them as though they don’t have age-related, coldly detached limitations. There are offenders in
some of their security (and policy) sections who have technology for which they, alone, could never be responsible.

One hyperversal noted that, rather than repeat a well proportioned good behavior scheme wherever possible, some
offending hyperversal individuals (and subcultures) will try to screw up on purpose, then try to impose an
authoritarian imprimateur, or role model, on the spectacle---thus reinforcing and acting out the desired authority
role.

Apparently, some Verdants suffer the same defect. With pathetic, post-apocalyptic populations like the grays in tow, some Verdants apparently engage in a kind of thrill-seeking while trying to make use of some of the most corrupt humans on this planet. The question is whether Verdant regimes recognize the dangers in doing so.

Verdants may think they can get ahead by being the coldest, most calculating aliens in our inter-group neighborhood, but there is one most important catch:

The Verdant home galaxy will probably be delta t (or alt. t) depleted and dangerous long before other, surrounding galaxies (it already has an unusually high number of supernovas).

Then, Verdants will either have to go begging or may try to “conquer” extra-galactic terrain through abductions and mobbed up technology schemes (like their intervention here). Whether Verdants admit it or not, there are major obstacles to doing so. Hyperversals have repeatedly stated that all suitable galaxies are already deeply inhabited. Hyperversals should know: they’re responsible for ensuring that all galaxies moderate and reduce population as the current universe cycle is depleted.

Meanwhile, the Verdant regime moves in on other galaxies and takes advantage of vulnerable populations. In order
to pull it all off, they must sell hyperversals on the coldness and brutal efficiency of IFSP manipulations--as though
Verdants are helping hyperversals get rid of potential war-like offenders, while also evolving others.

You can see the hypocrisy in it: Verdants are the worst population offenders we’ve encountered, to date. They steal
in and try to trade with vulnerable populations. They run the clock on other galaxies and hope that hyperversals will
see them as a vulgar, but necessary mixer of sorts--forcing other galaxies to interact on a larger scale. Meanwhile,
by their own admission to Krapf, Verdants are intellectually-marginalized sexuals who change sex mates every few
decades or so—out of boredom. They use epic amounts of energy and take more for themselves than does any
other population in this small part of Virgo. They take 13 planets to themselves for every home planet occupied by
lesser conscript aliens. According to Phillip Krapf’s numbers, they spawn another 23 billion Verdants for every 6
billion aliens on a conscript planet.


Is that good ecology?

Worse yet, there are indications that some in the Verdant bureaucracy dismiss previous generations of hyperversals as ineffective old geezers, in a sense, and try to take advantage of them, even though hyperversals are far more advanced and capable, albeit removed from the struggles of newly-evolved populations.

Etched into my memory is one morning, more than a year after first learning about hyperversals, when there were a
series of callous remarks by a seemingly-hybrid intermediary alien whose electrogravity indications, apparent
associations (and observations by other aliens) suggest that he works for a generation of hyperversals who
preceded the recent generation of hyperversals (yes, they make certain, discreet appearances, of sorts, and
usually do so in ways that suggest more advanced capabilities). The given hybrid coldly and distantly said that
sexuals can be so dangerous that the deaths of some potentially-dangerous sexuals’ planets are unavoidable. He
repeated such remarks as though oblivious to the fact that humans are endangered by the IFSP’s aggressive
manipulations. It was as though we were allowed no time to educate our people before the IFSP does too much
damage. Of course, the apparent hybrid works for a hard-liner from an older hyperversal generation whose job it is
to be blunt about such scenarios. The older hyperversal has made a variety of remarks, some encouraging, others
coldly distant.

Distressed by the predicament, I couldn’t help thinking that humans live in a remote location that may best be
described by way of analogy. If the universe were but our one, single planet, we would live in a tiny hamlet (earth)
hiding within the shadow of a volcano (our future merged elliptical galaxy) adjoining a tiny, remote island (the Milky
Way) that is part of a group of islands (the local galaxy groups) situated somewhere near a modest-sized city (the
Virgo supercluster). In other words, some of the hyperversals attending to our situation may be like a nearly-
invisible consulate on a small island far out in the South Pacific, or the Indian Ocean. They try to perform their
responsibilities according to a certain plan. In this analogy, the Verdants would be a single tribe living in a number
of villages on nearby islands--far from greater population centers (like the Horologium supercluster, or the Shapley
supercluster).

The greater population centers of the universe may not hear much about our distant, relatively small predicament.
They have other crises to attend to. In terms of the analogy above, the death of the gray planet would like a small,
lushly forested South Pacific island that was mined and depleted under the illusion of false promises by foreign
officials, whose interests leveled all forests, leaving the island a treeless, desert wasteland. (There is just such an
island, by the way.) Meanwhile, the gray planet isn’t merely ruined; it’s completely, irrevocably dead, and grays have
been removed to work on what, by way of analogy, is yet another island in a tacky little casino (that fancies itself
“economically” important).

In other words, humans should be aware that Verdants may try to play up to more advanced hyperversals by posing
an implicit deal, of sorts:

the Verdants will do grotesque dirty work, yet stay in touch.

Verdants will help kill off dangerous new populations and help avert the risk that other alien worlds in the vicinity will interact with each other independent of hyperversal inputs. Verdants may try to sell the scheme by saying it ensures that no renegade early move to precipitate a premature universe cycle will find adherents where Verdants go. As a result of Verdant ruthlessness, lesser aliens will come crawling to hyperversals in desperation--seeking the consideration of anyone more capable than the Verdants.

Meanwhile, if so meager--albeit quickly learning--a person as myself (and those in communication with me) can see
through such a scheme at this early date, thanks to persistent coaching from native aliens and other hyperversals
put off by the Verdants, then the Verdant scheme to buddy up to hyperversals may be in trouble. Ironically, the
Verdant scheme probably causes competing, non-IFSP aliens to interact more tightly together. Rather than avert alien interactions outside of the Verdants’ bully scheme, Verdant dundering should cause a yet-larger convention to cohere.

Now, here's an unexpected irony:

We, as a newly evolved people, need to remember that hyperversals can be highly civilized. They seem to be sensitive to human suffering, and, due to their relatively insular remove from people like us, some hyperversals can sometimes come across like the former children of gentle, trusting societies.

They are categorically more civilized than the Verdants and have a greater, finer kind of insight, which can be enormously helpful. Nonetheless, the Verdants' predatory opportunism seems to have found a way to manipulate hyperversals’ vulnerabilities. Verdants' sheer, specious indulgence (their many planets, their vast rake of resources to please their own crowd, their desire to travel and sexually indulge beneath the light of billions of other stars) has found a way to take maximum advantage of hyperversal aliens.

The most advanced hyperversals are non-sexuals: neither as brutal and predatory, nor as territorial as the Verdants. The difference between non-sexuals and sexuals is one of the defining themes of life in this universe. Hyperversals have moderated their numbers, certainly their primitive impulses. They live within community/communities of mind, a much more advanced social premise. Meanwhile, Verdants aren’t yet a community of mind--by any stretch; they don’t treat others as equals.

So, Verdant opportunists have found a way to twist and manipulate some hyperversals for Verdant gain. In their animal-like rush to take too much, Verdants, like spoiled children, have learned to traumatize lesser populations in order to take advantage of them. Through the IFSP’s (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets)  direct operatives, they essentially sponsor and manipulate mass killing, i.e. the many crimes against humanity promoted (and profited) by the IFSP’s direct human operatives. In other words, in part, Verdants coldly and methodically threaten the survival of entire planets, Verdants worsen tensions and conflicts in order to profit by doing so.

Verdants spokespersons say that’s but a tangential irony of their larger, cosmic responsibilities, yet Verdants use a target population's resources and pepper surrounding star systems with small, token surrogate populations who work for the IFSP. Verdants make cold criminals of deeply-infiltrated, direct operatives yet turn around and tell hyperversals that Verdants need to be on the scene to tend to such crimes (as if all people on the target planet are as dangerous as the IFSP’s worst direct operatives). Verdants may feel a compulsion to foul humans in order to be able to later say that we, humans, were violent and cruel, hence we can’t turn around and claim that Verdants are cruel for having manipulated numerous terracides. This is a very real issue of our time. The Verdants may want us to ape their peculiar habits and say that “(name of a lost planet) died for YOUR sins, too,” so to speak.

And the hyperversals? Of course they monitor such doings, probably appalled, for the most part. Verdants have learned to maneuver people(s) like us into atrocious spectacles, orgies of violence and religious warfare, extremes of (partly Verdant-sponsored) greed and pretension to #1 military status. Like bizarrely spoiled children, the most corrupt Verdant manipulators have learned that the more ghastly and atrocious the planet-killing spectacle, the more aghast and in thrall are the hyperversals—who may try to help the struggling peoples. Hyperversals may respond with epic gestures and help provide greater universal context (noting possibilities that seem obvious to hyperversals yet aren't attainable by humans, at present). Nonetheless, it makes hyperversals feel good to offer some guidance--which Verdants probably see as superfluous. The IFSP moves in for the kill and plays the hyperversals for sheer, specious gain.

*Some of the worst hyperversals do material deals with the Verdants—they profit by Verdant overkill (various human and other community researchers have probed this specific relationship in detail).

Meanwhile, Verdants try to sell their scheme to hyperversals by saying that although their direct human operatives
and the Verdants profit by causing war and conflict, plus irreparable destruction of Earth’s environment, Verdants
will make sure that humans will be turned into non-sexuals--via the Verdant breeding program. Verdants argue that
either the death of planet Earth, or its degradation, will have been worth it.

*I literally hear such arguments at various junctures. Verdants occasionally boast that they physically dominate at least one large galaxy (containing more than 100 billion stars). Having tended to a wide variety of alien populations, Verdants argue that as a mega-population, they’re like the ancient ancestors of many hyperversals. In short, Verdants say that their understandings more closely approximate those of hyperversals than do the smaller, isolated perspectives of lesser populations, hence hyperversals should see the logic in the IFSP’s (Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets) design.

One hyperversal who is apparently older, if not more advanced than the –X3’s stated that the Verdants are seen as
a test case that will force the Virgo galaxy supercluster’s populations to organize in order to limit offenders of the
sort. If such is the case, then Verdants aren’t actually favored by hyperversals. Instead, Verdant corruption is
expected to spur others to do better. Hyperversals have a way of rounding out any problem of the sort by seeing it
in a larger perspective (which is characteristic of basic hyper-dynamics, although it can fall short of universality and
can mistake the simple event horizons of a single galaxy and certain hyperversals’ technology for the sum total of
the universe---I’ve seen this and it is most immodest). As is apparently the case among larger, universe-wide
hyperversal interactions, the errors of any one population invariably stimulate either a corrective response on a
larger scale, or a failure among the given population---a crisis in which more advanced parties can offer guidance
and further insight.

*Some hyperversals would say that, with time and patience, advanced consciousness should prevail anywhere, at any time, because any failure to assimilate such insights is due to crude, lower-order misconceptions. In other words, all quantities derive from the whole, which is deeply inter-dimensioned with a finer, gentler kind of genius.