|
AlienMind
The Verdants
A Second
Depth of Awareness
02.01.2006
Humans who take time to get up to speed on telepathy and remote
sensing have what is, in effect, a second depth of awareness. They
both think and feel BEYOND their immediate, physical bodies. Second
depth awareness involves a deeper, often intuitive awareness of
negative energy (and electrogravity), coupled with a greater outward
spread of the person’s sensing (this invariably merges into
collectively shared dimensions). Via a negative cycle through, and
out into space-time, they feel out into further reaches. This is how
some of us can almost instantly know what another is thinking (often
far away).
Strange as it may seem, animals lacking
intellectual barriers may rely on second depth awareness for their
survival. When elephants grabbed humans and ran uphill before the
tsunami struck in 2005, when dogs ran upslope before any visible
signs of disaster, they probably relied on second depth. Second
depth awareness is part of remote sensing. The physics (and
community of mind) that allow this to occur are explained in earlier
chapters.
Second depth awareness allows simple telepathy to network through
many different people at the same time and eventually graduates into
a higher order of thought: community of mind. At first this may
require coordinated focus on a given individual or others, who act
as a kind of meeting place for various minds, but over time it
becomes a larger, habitual awareness. This allows us to walk into a
room full of people and know the mood and subject of recent
interactions there. It involves a kind of transparency, as does all
telepathy. *Go ahead and try it; in most cases it can only improve
your life.
Again, as Russel Targ PhD says, “The big secret is that there are no
secrets.” Other people can know your thoughts. Initially, this may
be awkward among sexuals, but among non-sexuals it’s much less so.
Transparency of the sort takes a little getting used to. Many of the
lies and misconceptions that tangle up in a mind wither away, as a
result (a saving grace, in itself). A man who spends too much time
looking a woman up and down may find that she turns warily and looks
in his direction. In second depth societies, a man who wants power
for criminal reasons can’t do so without detection. The lies of a
given regime and its crimes can all be known—by ANY of the people.
In short, second depth awareness, which all aliens develop and which
humans need to be more honest about, helps to keep humans and aliens
more honest. It is both expected, and necessary, in order to
understand an intelligent universe. Over time, second depth
awareness evolves into higher order(s) of extra awareness, which
advanced hyperversals and community of mind exemplify. There are
all-important, if not phenomenal understandings and dynamics that
can only be known through such awareness, and equality. Believe it
or not, the difference between community of mind and an individual
is GREATER THAN the difference between an individual and a single
brain cell.
When newly-evolved populations discover negative energy and
electrogravity, advanced beings contact them for various reasons:
When humans start to interact (and probe) within
second depth awareness, the same advanced community tries, in
various ways, to assure that pre-existing, non-violent conventions
are understood. As we’ve seen with hyperversals, this meeting of
minds can be touchy, at times, but, in overall terms, should lead to
mutually more evolved continuities.
So, when hyperversal aliens fret and distance themselves from
rough-edged human dundering (and desires), it helps to remember that
hyperversals share larger, more smoothly-contoured interactions of
mind, even if some hyperversals may err when interacting with
humans. Fearful human impulses and arrogations may seem strange
them---hard to fathom because hyperversals begin with better ideas,
right from the start. To imagine how we “feel” to them, just imagine
how it would be to try to understand a caveman who knows but 30
words, a primitive biased toward the use of force and blind to that
which he hasn’t yet considered.
Once again, it helps to remember: in both the forward and the past
directions in time are increasingly more advanced orders of mind,
and being. In addition, more advanced societies are all around us in
nearly every direction, in the present sense. There’s much to learn.
Due to the exigencies of larger circumstance, advanced aliens may
sometimes feel cut off and dessicated of vital emotions and
sensitivities. One hyperversal alien said that the best of humanity
“is like human silk,” apparently speaking in reference to our
independent, emotional and critical possibilities (plus other
cultural resonance). Ironically, the statement also hints at how
humankind can sometimes be seen as small and isolated.
John Mack wrote that an abductee named Catherine said a
gray alien
told her that his kind know what care means but “We just don’t feel
it as intensely as you do.” Mack wrote that Catherine,
“could
acknowledge from the (abducting) alien perspective and commitment to
their enterprise they might feel affection as we might toward a pet
animal that was being used for experiments.”
(Abduction, p. 163,
166)
Sometimes, humans note a distant, if not patronizing alien attitude
toward the human condition. For example, the Verdant-abetting “three ellipticals” hyperversal section sometimes tries to fob off a
superficial image of themselves, at face value. That isn’t how they
see themselves, of course, but, given the ghastly ironies in the
Verdant strategy, they find it convenient to pose themselves that
way to humans. For humans, the sheer presumption of such aliens can
be a problem. Hyperversals of the sort tend to think that everything
is different after the hyperversals. Moreover, they may attempt to
pre-empt other structures and communications networks in this entire
multi-galactic vicinity.
So, we see advanced hyperversals who in some ways can be alternately
helpful, yet coldly calculating— accustomed to seeing vast numbers
of other aliens die. They may, at times, tend to dismiss all ET’s
who evolved during the current cycle as though we’re all
inexperienced, naïve lessers. Meanwhile, ET’s of the current
universe cycle can see what the future holds: a stark need to
conserve, prevent conflict, and reduce populations in galaxies like
the Milky Way and Andromeda because we will merge, forming a large,
hot and less hospitable elliptical galaxy. It’s either do or die in
such cases. But current cycle ET’s appear to know that.
At times, the “three ellipticals” hyperversals’ attitude suggests
that if humans proceed from more equalitarian, ecological
considerations, we’ll do all right. However, at times some of them
will flip that attitude and act as though the fix is in and millions
of humans will die, due to the Verdant incursion. We’ve heard the
three ellipticals section say that the Verdant spectacle is simply a
variation on a theme because humans would otherwise have experienced
an intervention by one group or another. Hyperversals of the sort
suggest that humans lack perspective regarding such matters. Keep in
mind that hyperversals live long and have seen long histories of
cold, hard brutality here, and elsewhere. They assume that one way
or another, we’ll be compelled to change.
Frustrated Aliens’ Impulses
We’ve all seen how frustrated humans can revert to destructive, if
not murderous impulses to secure reproductive access and protect
their food supply. The most corrupt humans will lie, cheat, steal
and even foul the entire global environment in order to isolate
themselves in splendor. But what about aliens? When challenged
beyond immediate control, how do they react?
Over time and under challenging circumstances, we’ve catalogued a
variety of frustrated aliens’ impulses. In the same way that humans
have animal impulses, we’ve seen various aliens resort to
mind-destructive behaviors to protect their work here from being
disturbed.
Mind destructive, if not brain
destructive behaviors arise, along with attempts to stultify humans:
i.e. a tendency to provoke a human to run off and drink alcohol or
feel extreme anger, or a tendency to (remotely) make veiled but
threatening remarks to provoke and frighten humans (i.e. as part of
the IFSP - Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets - direct operatives’ and three ellipticals’ scheme to thwart,
if not decapitate, independent human initiative).
When pushed beyond their coldly detached
limits, various aliens impulsively toss off mind-destructive, or
brain destructive and thought-stultifying gestures. From an
evolutionary perspective, this resembles socio-biology (wherein
humans prioritize their doings in order to maximize their genetic
proliferation). Among some non-sexual aliens, there is an impulse to
obliterate competing thought systems and impose their own—by any
means necessary. However, because they come from more evolved, less
internally violent societies, the worst of (interacting) aliens’
impulses, to date, appear to be less murderous, less overtly prone
to violence, as are those of the worst humans.
In some cases, advanced aliens will float a veiled threat into a
complex human telepathic interaction in order to pre-empt
predictable human threats to other humans. In such cases, the remark
may be couched in softer, essentially see-through terms (assuming
that the humans are aware of the aliens’ manner and are marginally
deferential). At other times, however, i.e. in the case of the IFSP’s direct operatives, more advanced, supervising aliens
(including some of the three ellipticals section) may make
threatening remarks posed as though human yet intended to cut off
any thought of an attempt to end their control over direct IFSP
operatives’ doings. This is yet another aspect of the desire to
control the pace and outcome of human doings.
In such cases, basic questions arise about independent, critical
judgment—both in our case (the ability to judge such ET’s as they
are), and in theirs (has their society gone too cold and insular to
be able to criticize itself?). With alien psychotronic technology,
which can both monitor and be controlled by brain energy, certain
oppressive potentials come into being. No doubt some societies go
through nightmarish phases of psychotronic abuses, yet, over time,
they develop a measure of transparency. Societies of the sort need
to establish a good basis of law and proportionality, right and
wrong, or else they soon fall behind better populations.
I recall initially being impressed by the hyperversals, then
disappointed that they don’t have a more active physical presence.
They tend to use hybrid, genetically engineered copies of
current-cycle aliens who live in this galaxy, in part, to pre-empt
their contact and interaction with neighbors BEFORE they’ve been
assimilated in a larger sense; in part as a filter, of sorts. In
some ways, hyperversals from the last universe cycle are more like
us than not. They can be too obedient, too easily used by the worst
among them. Some are too idealized in their remove from other
populations, others are designed to interface with dangerous aliens
like the Verdants, for example. Apparently, genetically engineered
hybrids are used for an interface with Verdants so as to avoid
Verdant theft of hyperversals’ genetic material and technology.
As is noted in previous chapters, hyperversals suggest that we do as
they did: we move, as best we can, toward a predominantly non-sexual
reproduction strategy. They go far, far out of their way to suggest
that we integrate into larger entities, which, they suggest, will
allow us to be included in the next universe cycle more easily. The
question is: which larger entity? Do we forgo independent critique
in order to do so? Or do we find our own way and make our own
associations? In either case, hyperversals live in our vicinity and
have vital inputs into every mega-population, or galaxy-scale
coalition of aliens.
One hyperversal points out that some independents of the previous
universe cycle made it into the current cycle yet accorded and were
open to various interactions. In other words, they didn’t arrogate
too much to themselves. Of course, from our perspective, how
“separate” would such independents actually be? We know they can
field a critique of larger mega-populations, and who is to say which
are more astute and insightful: independents or large
mega-populations? Both options are incomplete without the other.
This is a major topic of discussion among aliens, given the human
penchant for independence (in the face of the Verdant intervention).
Nonetheless, if we develop better international law and try not to
take too much, if we don’t swarm out and attempt to occupy other
systems (as Verdants do), we are approachable. If we achieve a
better planetary ecology and use electrogravity only sparingly,
under global accords, we have a good chance. The irony is that,
eventually, we’ll probably interbreed with aliens (not necessarily a
sexual act) and will exchange genetic options. Billions of years in
the future, if not sooner, we’ll look more like the mixed-origin hyperversals. Our heritage will derive from many, many planets, (as
it may already, due to previous genetic manipulations).
From what we’ve seen, to date, hyperversals clearly derive from
different backgrounds and have different physiques. They aren’t
monolithic products of one greedy stab outward to dominate the
cosmos. Instead, they are in large part those humbler others who
probably recoiled at greedy example and organized to protect
themselves from such excess. Some were the meek, less wasteful
masses.
|