AlienMind
The Verdants
Surviving the
New Technologies
02.26.2006
Although some market-minded naives think that new technology is
salvation, historians often disagree. When technology is misused or
acquired by repressive regimes, it can lead to war, environmental
destruction and overpopulation. So, in 1947 when
alien technology
thousands of years beyond human science fell out of the sky in
Roswell and was scooped up by Cold War opportunists, humankind was
in for a crash course in cosmic citizenship.
Aliens continue to debate how, and from whom, we must learn, yet all
agree: humans must get up to speed in the ways of more advanced
societies. Old rationalizations about balance of power warfare and
man vs. nature are no longer adequate. The animal “logic” of old
thrived when there were natural checks on aberrant regimes. Before
1945, humankind always had a second chance. Now, however, the
consequences of human excess are so drastic and crippling that there
may be no second chance.
When alien electrogravity technology first fell into human hands,
there were two immediate risks. First, it could be misused, causing
environmental de-stabilization, and second, it provoked human greed
to acquire more of the same, which led to the dual dilemmas of
attacks on alien ships in order to scavenge them, and secret
interactions with IFSP - Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets - aliens who were able to deepen their
intervention, absent public scrutiny. Advanced technology was too
tempting for the US elite, which was in no way prepared to compete
with the minds and methods of aliens, at the time.
IFSP aliens knew that, of course, and have manipulated elite greed
to their advantage ever since. The National Security Act of 1947,
which was partly intended to keep downed technologies secret, has
been used to hide massively criminal doings by semi-private parties,
further compromising them, and has become the worst threat to
democracy and human sovereignty on this planet. The crimes committed
have been so severe that some think a national reconciliation like
that of post-apartheid South Africa, with truth-telling and some
amnesties, may be necessary to return the US to a semblance of
democracy. As one hyperversal stated, “there have been casualties of
the (human-alien) interaction.”
Fair-minded hyperversals and other alien sources say we are in for a
number of highly shocking discoveries about the IFSP’s infiltration
and breeding program. Early reports about various elite “direct
operatives” provide but a glimpse of what we will learn. It will
take some digging, however.
Over time, it has become apparent that
hyperversal aliens long ago learned a basic, but necessary trick to
protect themselves from the misuse of negative-cycling technologies. Hyperversals are able to reverse
delta t the
delta t
that’s written
into
Tom Bearden’s equations. In other words, hyperversals can
minimize, if not reverse some of the speeding of time (and tissue
damage) caused on a micro level when negative-cycling technology is
used, albeit at a sum total cost to the universe cycle.
To humans, Tom Bearden’s assertion that use of electrogravity speeds
the flow of time (making time elastic) seems like a one-way ride,
i.e. as though when we use electrogravity we simply run the clock
(like a vector) in that part of virtual space-time. However,
hyperversals can multiply interfere electrogravity (and other
cycles) in complex ways to counter the localized running of the
clock on quanta. This allows for finer and more deftly
counterbalanced uses of electrogravity and other negative-cycling
technologies. Over billions of years time suc methods have been
refined, allowing hyperversal technology to be multiply horizoned,
so to speak. As a result, it is much safer, yet, like all negative
(and alternatively) cycling technology, it nonetheless deducts from
the total lifetime of the current universe cycle.
Again, hyperversal science is hyper-advanced---so much so that,
given the fact that they’ve engineered new universe cycles, part of
the structure of the atom, itself, may be viewed as having
technological qualities. For some that may be hard to believe, but
it’s true. Humans have barely scraped the surface of science,
relatively speaking. There are much deeper implications.
In community interactions and in medical or planetary doings humans
must learn to re-delta t the delta t in order to adjust correctly,
albeit at a sum total cost—preferably on a finer, micro scale. This
would involve a more gently distributed “alt t” value and must take
into consideration the effect on nearby star (or galactic+) systems.
Again, aliens suggest that we use negative-cycle technology only
sparingly in order to reserve Earth’s ecology for the billions of
years that we will need it.
Nature has allowed us an
enviable biome,
which must not be depleted, lest we lose future freedoms.
One hyperversal, speaking for the “three ellipticals” section, tried
to rationalize their role in the Verdant-Centaurus A situation by
rhetorically asking,
“What do you do when a large elliptical begins
to (tilt or re-incline and shift negative cycle dangerously)?”
In
retrospect, the remark was ironic because Verdant excess now runs
the clock on surrounding galaxies and, along with Andromeda, we must
contend with Verdant-Centaurus demands on our negative (and alt
cycle) energy ecology. It’s possible that Verdants act as stalking
horses for the three ellipticals section’s future energy strategy.
Verdants may already have jeopardized the long-term arrangement in
Centaurus, hence the question about what to do when a large
elliptical begins to tilt, so to speak.
And what is to be done with populations like
the grays and Elders
(related?) who allowed their societies to be riven by intervention,
their planets ruined by crude elite use of negative energy
technology? One hyperversal stated that the original Elder planet
died because Elders tried to use “a direct I E W line” (on a
planetary scale). In other words, there was no softly-contoured
re-conditioning of their energy system. They failed to re-distribute
and counter-balance their technology. (“I E W” may mean something
like inter-dimensional energy wave, or some such.)
Hyperversals sometimes seem wearied with having to steer emergent
populations into more advanced genetic options and ecological
strategies. They may feel burdened because the further back in
origin hyperversals go, the longer they live, apparently. I recall
one hyperversal remarking that another was relatively young because
he was only 365,000 years old. Older hyperversals sometimes vent
their frustration with the physical presumptions of younger alien
populations who don’t foresee the demands that population growth and
negative cycle technologies place on the universe. Imagine how much
history you would see if you traveled great distances and lived
millions of years. Vital sensitivities can wither, resulting in deep
cynicism. Hyperversals of the sort may steer upstart aliens into
larger aggregations in order to evolve them more quickly, even if
the price of doing so is their freedom.
One hyperversal criticized such doings by remarking that hastily
compiled collectives or groupings sometimes have an unformed,
shell-like quality. Dependent populations within them may be
reluctant to criticize the burgeoning entity, unable to think
clearly and independently. Technology then supplants the impetus for
self-reliability and good planning, yet an old numb hyperversal may
dismiss such complications, preferring their manageability. There’s
a tendency for such individuals to think that they don’t have to
re-think such situations because they already did that kind of
thinking long, long ago, hence they needn’t worry themselves.
On the other hand, hyperversals view us from the perspective of a
number of previous universe cycles. How many, we can’t quite say,
but there are certainly more generations of previous-cycle hyperversals than most humans would suspect. In other words, from a
hyperversal’s perspective, current-cycle aliens must be studied and
judged according to their compatibility.
Once, while arguing that the human struggle is exacerbated by an
aggressive IFSP sexual population’s disproportionate ambitions, I
outlined a moderate, low-intensity human strategy that would allow
for the best long-term ecology. In reply, an older hyperversal said
it may be that some hyperversals “don’t WANT long term” in our case.
I was exasperated.
His cynicism was partly imbued with an
older hyperversal’s existential considerations—like that of eastern
thinkers not wanting to be reborn. The remark also touched upon the
seemingly endless parade of crude regimes and physical pretensions
of early technological populations, the violence and excess that
they inflict on both themselves and the hyperversal ecology. So,
from my perspective, the remark seemed a lapse of judgment, even if
it were only offered to model or exemplify a certain intellectual
resonance. Yet from the hyperversal’s perspective, he was arguing
the case for more rapid assimilation into a larger hierarchical
entity, a quicker ability to evolve out of our crude sexual impulses
and physical aspirations (i.e. no long-term, independent
alternative).
Once, when frustrated with cold, off-handed gestures by certain
hyperversals, I suggested that they can be mapped within Virgo, and
one hyperversal retorted that his population is “not on that map.”
If I’m not mistaken, hyperversals don’t need to linger in a
Mars or
Earth-like environment. First off, they either have entire planets
that they shielded to make it into this universe cycle, or they have
large artificial craft that are probably miles wide that they can
inhabit and move to various places. They can easily shield such from
the prying eyes of lesser gray or Verdant-like aliens. A hyperversal
could be at your side, their craft in your vicinity, and no human
technology would even begin to detect it. They can remotely mask all
of our sensing equipment, change the readings, and easily disguise
any fluctuations. They can do the same to grays. Billions of years
of science make that easy.
In retrospect, the so-called hyperversals are a conundrum. Their
statements turn our cosmology on its head, yet their abilities and
breadth of awareness clearly indicate a much-more-than-gray/Verdant
capability, a higher degree of advancement. In the end, the
existence of hyperversals suggests that a kind of river runs through
our universe, a multiversal continuum that somehow re-dimensions at
the fringes of our physical notion of concretes. Apparently, time is
not a one-way, linear river. Instead, it is multi-dimensional. This
offers the hope of human assimilation into a more refined, shared
order of being, over time.
The stickiest aspects of human-hyperversal interactions involve
basic questions about sexuality vs. non-sexuality, community mindform and whether offending populations must be absorbed and put
to use, rendering a given collective within a kind of shell
mentality, or whether independent aliens can be trusted to moderate
their energy use and become sufficiently involved with other
populations that they evolve and accord, on a large scale, within
ecological requirements.
These are issues than cannot be avoided. We
must be literate about them in order to be competent.
|