AlienMind

The Verdants


 Mega-Populations

04-10-06

The best reports, to date, indicate that humans have interacted with aliens affiliated with aggregations and alignments that touch upon a variety of galaxies. So, our awareness begins on an inter-galactic scale, right from the start. In order to better understand such populations and compete where and if necessary, we must know more about them.


In every suitable galaxy, we can expect to find mega-populations that occupy dozens, if not thousands of planets. The Verdants are but one example. Some mega-populations originally expanded for reasons of need, while others likely grew to compete with neighbors.

 

Diplomatic and material relations between mega-populations can be tricky— from the human perspective. The best way to make sense of them is to probe and investigate entire categories, rather than one mere case, or another. To limit our scrutiny to one single mega-complex is to fall in their hole, in a sense. Their singular peculiarities shouldn’t define our larger understanding because there are billions of galaxies. Within mega-populations, independent critique is sometimes lacking, hence we now join the ranks of myriad others who must look for needed improvements both on and off-world, despite our current limitations.


Again, within the alternate-cycle structuring of space-time and the universe are trace aspects of the near-whole’s information (and sentience). Although it may, at first, appear to have a faded, seemingly remote quality, it is “here,” nonetheless, for those who begin with the requisite science and insight. The non-locality of quantum physics is an artifact of a universal no-boundary condition, which is reportedly due to negative-cycling of all mass/matter/and energy back into itself---on a universal scale. All quanta loop back in upon themselves due to vastly larger cycles, hence they are discrete, in a sense (seemingly tucked behind a moving membrane, or quantum horizon). They are all clocked, in the most basic delta t/alt t sense (elastic time), on a universal scale. So, although gravity appears to be very weak, compared to electromagnetism (light waves), gravity shapes the entire universe, while electromagnetism pales in comparison, on the cosmic scale.


Humans who linger on the cusp of such understandings tend to do so because they assume that the universe is basically three-dimensional but with inexplicable ironies (black holes, gravity and weird quantum mysteries). However, if we suspend such thinking and contour our models to account for the better science of aliens, the faster-than-light ironies of their technology AND negative energy (i.e. condensed state physics), we quickly see that the universe isn’t three-dimensional. Instead, negative cycles connect “mass” down through the nucleus and far out into space-time AT THE SAME TIME.

 

So, it isn’t three-dimensional. It plunges inward, into a kind of negative space (from the old-world perspective) while it fluctuates far outward into a greater dimension, in the most basic sense of the word. It does so precisely, like clockwork. Once our world begins to experiment with electrogravity and negative energy technologies, we appear on the larger energy map of the universe. Different mega-populations will try to tell us that they are the guardians of the delta t conservation. Some will use that excuse to take advantage of a vulnerable population.


As long as you know that, you can foresee the larger, sometimes independent implications of ecological responsibility. Various materially-uninterested aliens have explained this to humans, over and over again. Their advice and insights are of epic significance. Meanwhile, mega-populations will tell you that all worlds need to accord, all peoples must collectively interact to some extent. That much is true, however, some megas grew essentially uncorrected, going from one kind of imperialism to a larger kind of presumption without learning to treat others as equals, without opening their governments to independent critique and binding rules against destructive interventions. Meanwhile, of course, there are nearly instantaneous consequences for having abused lesser populations, however faint and distant they may seem at a given time.


The best aliens suggest that the all-of-time consequences for wrongdoing may seem subtle, if not elusive, yet are inescapable. The most highly advanced societies both look for, and constrain offenders in ways that aren’t always explicit because offenders tend to ignore finer cautions and guidance. Awkward situations arise in which offenders excluded from higher-order involvement rationalize ill-gotten gains in strictly material terms. Detached from their victims AND higher order understandings, they don’t anticipate the almost tao-like re-cycling of all being and implications. Some of the ugliest consequences may lie within an offending mega-population: the stifling of dissent, a rigidly presumed “oneness” of group mindform (policed by psychotronics), plus any threat that such may pose to various neighbors.


In other words, apathy and failure to criticize a given regime can become a singular hell-hole of a sort---trapped within a kind of event horizon that may be hard to discern, from within the offending presumption. So, the message for those content to merely feather their own, small nest in the United States or elsewhere on this planet is that you can’t possibly live safely, you won’t preserve your freedoms and resources unless you do more to share with all others on this planet. Failure to do so will result in catastrophe: rising violence and sea levels, disease and depletion of resources---all of which leads to dependency on off-world manipulators.

 

You can’t hide behind weak-minded ideas about 3-D anonymity within elite economy and then expect your children to live safely when you’re gone. Your very thoughts and observations affect all that you see, however faintly. The “new” physics now upon us leap out of the old Cartesian box, hence you must plan for the future of ALL on this planet. If you don’t, no matter how richly you live now, your children will suffer and will condemn your generation for weak-kneed obedience, an epic failure to act when necessary.


There are no elite excuses. There is no escape from universal precision of the sort. Planets that don’t rise up against elite incompetency either die, or become the lesser servants of cold, often ruthless alien controllers. There is no second chance if we fail. We will never again be entrusted with a biological beauty like Earth.


The pre-noted hyperversal alien’s remark about how some hyperversals may not want a population like ours to endure over “the long term” can be interpreted to mean that they would prefer to see us absorbed by a larger, controlling collective. Such a perspective assumes that new populations are best grown like grapes: suffering drought and hardship or even manipulated planetary death in order to produce the sweetest end product, the least offensive outcome.

 

As if to underscore such an attitude, on a previous occasion one of the “three ellipticals” hyperversals (ghosted by a more advanced hyperversal) showed us a graphic about a recurrent, if not prototypical alien situation. In the graphic was a highly technological, interstellar-capable current-cycle alien with dark, wrap-around eyes standing next to his planet just as the planet, or home star, is going critical---which will require a move to another planet.

 

The hyperversal said something like “and what do you do when…(that)?” In other words, from the hyperversal’s perspective, situations of the sort pose a conundrum.

  • Do aliens in such a situation choose to accommodate themselves on their own, or must they make arrangements with larger collectives?

  • Essentially, the hyperversal’s attitude was that if a role within a large mega-population collective is (or was) good enough during his own past, then why should humans presume to go it alone, for now?

  • Why should we be any different?

If it seems as though I drone on and on about the “new” physics of aliens, it is for good reason. Different explanations and metaphors help the beginner understand such basics. There are a mixed variety of fantastic, yet precise ironies in the new physics of the universe. Although black holes may, at first, seem to be coldly unforgiving traps and dead-ends, of a sort, aliens suggest that they are deeply dimensioned with a kind of genius—in the best of mind(s), yet can also serve as a limitation upon the worst minds, more locally speaking.


Clearly, some mega-populations have been cultivated by more advanced, precursor aliens (hyperversals) for purposes of population control and basic ecology. Mega-population growth may seem wasteful and disproportionate to humans, yet some mega-populations have actually been encouraged to exceed normal bounds. Hyperversal aliens deriving from what were once large, aggressive mega-populations may be biased to think in terms of their own evolution and thus favor the growth of at least one larger, more extensive population in each galaxy for a variety of reasons. Numerous ongoing discussions with “the three ellipticals” hyperversals have elucidated their thinking on the subject. I’ve discussed such reasoning with some of them at numerous junctures, while seemingly more independent hyperversals watched closely.
 

The following are some of the reasons the “three ellipticals” section says they encourage certain mega-populations:

a) a large mega limits the growth of competitors in a given galaxy

b) a large mega can act as the spine of galaxy-wide treaties and conventions

c) a large mega can monitor an entire galaxy’s ecology and both report on, and organize others to ward off encroaching megas (like the Verdants) from surrounding galaxies

d) a large mega can be cultivated to take over the burdensome responsibilities of hyperversals from a previous cycle, allowing for a succession, of sorts

e) a large mega is both culturally and organizationally compatible with the larger, pre-existing doings of some hyperversal populations (i.e. breeding programs to upgrade emerging populations, peaceful conventions regarding trade, travel, minimization of weapons, etc.)

f) due to the simple animal nature of certain impulses, large megas will invariably arise, hence it’s better to both channel and ecologically manage them than to pretend that they shouldn’t exist, in the first place

Meanwhile, more modest, competing populations are always extant and sometimes argue to the contrary. They say the following:

a) large mega-populations can, themselves, become the ecological nightmare that is most feared

b) the best and most internally rigorous interactions on a galactic scale are always diverse, hence a variety of inter-communicating societies can monitor and collectively enforce a galaxy-wide ecology, even if there are times when planets dispute over replacement terra and resources

c) hyperversals, themselves, and the larger universe are vastly diverse, hence a more balanced diversity within a given galaxy is equally tenable

d) it’s better to practice moderation and cultivate large-scale diversity and interactions than to wallow in a mono-culture of grandiose pretensions premised upon specious domination

Of course, we both observe and can expect to encounter galaxies of breathtaking variety. Mindful of such diversity, it’s better to suffer some uncertainty and wariness rather than smugly rationalize one peculiarity over another. Populations of various sorts must keep others in check all across the universe. There must be constraints on specious excess. Collectively, within one organizing strategy or another, we’re all responsible for the long-term ecology.

 

* In our case, the die is already cast: there’s no room for us to grow disproportionately. There are megas here, already, and we’re due to merge with Andromeda.


Hyperversals say that a multiplicity of independent populations within a galaxy can sometimes be collectively expansive, if not disorganized (this argument comes from hyperversals of a mega-population origin). Some say nature runs a certain course, a statement that partly rationalizes their own ancient history. In some galaxies a given population will have expanded for reasons of greed or to “secure” future resources. In every case, surrounding populations must judge whether a given mega-population respects “wild” uninhabited terra that must be preserved for unspecified future evolution. Empty planets don’t strain the larger delta t ecology.


As you can see, once we begin to interact on a galactic scale, the entire universal ecology comes into focus.

  • How do we encourage interactions and accords, plus the exchange of ideas and controls between galaxies?

  • Does it trickle across, or does it arise through supercluster conventions mediated by hyperversals?

  • Must reluctant populations be provoked and herded to moderate themselves, or is it all just “laissez faire” (an attitude that predatory aliens occasionally propagate in order to weaken and deplete a target planet)?

Ever present in such discussions, in which some humans participate, is the hyperversal concern that independent aggregations of current-cycle aliens may organize on a larger scale than some hyperversals are prepared for, at a given time. Yet another discomforting wariness that we must live with. There are no easy answers in collective reckonings of the sort.


Due to internal contradictions, aliens from some mega-populations (i.e. the Verdants) will demean and chastise humans for striving to piece together a larger overview of alien relations. They suggest that humans are merely small-scale, if not incompetent to judge the complexities of their larger interactions. So we encounter coldly disdainful attitudes, duplicity and deception, in some quarters. Meanwhile, disdain of the sort can degrade into thinly veiled contempt, at times—which can be dangerous. An ecologically irresponsible people is extremely vulnerable.


Let’s look at further aliens’ statements about mega-populations. When touching upon the Verdant case, hyperversals in the “three ellipticals” section often ask how will you spread necessary ecological conventions (genetics, miscellaneous controls, inclusion of megas in planning for the next universe cycle, basic negative energy standards, de-weaponization, etc.) if you don’t cultivate certain mega-populations who can impose such controls in various neighborhoods and compel upstarts to change?

 

Sometimes the question is asked only rhetorically, with little or no intention of considering alternatives to the scheme. Meanwhile, there’s further hyperversal perspective that rationalizes both megas and independent populations, assuming that they must work out such responsibilities among themselves, rather than rely on hyperversals to do the heavy lifting.


At times, we see vast, universal implications in such discussions. Sometimes, hyperversals stress the fact that you can’t simply withdraw into a physical sense of yourself and your environs. Instead, you must remember that the convergence of larger communities require at least some faded measure of humility and forebearance. No one can endure without changing, neither hyperversals nor the most physically presumptuous of current cycle aliens.


When a people deplete their original sun or planet, they must judge whether they have matured with their star. Like humans, they may have been brash and conflicted, hence limited during early phases yet are usually challenged and humbled later.

  • Did they linger within animal sentience or move out into community awareness?

  • Did they mature into fainter, larger involvements or linger, retardedly, as run-on prevaricators?

  • Do outsiders see them as crude and lower-brain impulsive—too intent on their own physicality (a singular looking out, rather than feeling beyond themselves while looking in) or have they matured into the larger fade beyond such pretensions?

  • Now, as they ponder a move to another system, are they known for cynical manipulations, or are they seen as living inspiration?

No doubt there are various gradations of involvement with mega-populations. Some planets simply trade with them, which deepens their involvement. Others prefer to remain self-sustaining and distant in order to develop a more mature second or third-depth consciousness globally so they can better judge the risks and implications of larger interactions before dundering into them. Some mega-populations may be exemplary, of course. However, as is obvious on Earth, premature concession of bases to a questionable mega-population can be treacherous. Before the target people even know about it, they can lose control to a resource-hungry predator. Manipulated conflicts then follow—a “pacification program.”


In the Verdant case, we see a kind of browning UP to hard-line hyperversals in order to gain favor. At times, the routine seems most pretentious. Many times we’ve seen Verdants plunge into a human situation with an “Are you important?” kind of attitude that’s shamelessly elitist. The same applies to some of the IFSP’s direct operatives, who inflate their personal significance in order to drill fear into others. Sometimes it seems as though they are but stimulus-seeking patients on a universal psych ward, in a sense. Indications suggest that behavior of the sort is associated with inordinate use of energy and resources.


Meanwhile, the most “important” distinctions to be made lie within more basic considerations. For example,

  • how does the universe even derive, to begin with, and if it recycles, how do all kinds interdimension within a more timeless continuity?

  • how can a universe possibly exist (in the best way)?

Although such questions sound extraneous to some, their implications permeate every aspect of all existence. Mega-populations who know no bounds soon butt up against obstacles that can only be resolved through deeper, more advanced consideration (and humility). Ironically, it is the most basic questions that continually revolutionize human thought, not the most distended. No doubt this is true elsewhere. In other words, the only sustainable regard for others is anything, if not everything BUT self-importance.

  • And what are the internal dynamics of any given mega-population?

  • Do they ally with other megas, then seek to divide lesser domains in order to expand within them, or must they accord within a more advanced ecology and minimize their take in order to help new populations upgrade themselves through better example?

On a galactic scale, there are large-scale systems specifications (due to delta t/alt t, for example), and questions about how various networks interdimension.

  • Whose standards will prevail?

  • And when there is competition due to the death or depletion of old planets, then who will live where?

  • Who solves cases of predation and conflict?

  • And how do we enforce the necessary conventions: collectively, or through self-interested presumption?

Again, we’re talking about more advanced societies, not environmentally ruinous human precepts.


Within a mega-population, the individual dilemma is to judge whether the community behaves correctly and whether it needs to be changed. Imagine being a Verdant, for example: the pointless brinkmanship in knowing that your population is late for necessary, collective reckonings. Some 229 million years after first contact, they still take too much in order to enjoy themselves (some are stimulus-seeking sexuals).

 

Within their ranks,

  • what recourse is there?

  • do they speak out, or just shut up and smooth everything over in the name of empire?

Aliens of the sort need to see beyond their limited, internal conventions and reassess the whole, then fade it down to a more modest state. Then, and only then, will they be able to help others do similarly. In order to evolve into hyper-community, they must ask whether the best ecology is a stasis of pretended greatness, or does it lie within a receding, greater kind of out-of-body identity? Steady-state ideas about empire degrade into defensive, lying propaganda mills and resource predations.


Meanwhile, more mature populations are humbler, hence more capable within hyper-community. They can interact as mixed communities where the question of species isn’t so important. As such, they’re capable of a higher, finer aesthetic---more faintly on a larger scale (yet may encounter awkward, disturbing situations, nonetheless).


When pondering the nature of mega-populations across the universe, it helps to remember that some large populations (and hyperversals) will risk the sacrifice of entire planets in order to cobble together de-sensitized, obedient aggregates because they’re easier to control. There are structural ironies in doing so---mega-population operatives who know that they’re watched and may succumb to numb, psychotronically-stimulated group rationalizations, in the process.


We’ve even seen hyperversals who play as many ideas as possible into a given situation and, due to their larger brains or a game-like juvenile reminiscence, seem to vaguely play at mastery and try to lose you behind the scheme of their objectives. Depending on a given hyperversal’s age and cumulative psychological conditioning, he or she may fade into desensitized withdrawal and rationalize the suffering of new-cycle aliens.


Among mega-populations and independents alike, hyperversals try to cultivate hyper-community and universal citizenship, rather than insular withdrawal. However, depending on the alien who speaks to you, you may not hear about this, in some cases. Further confounding the situation are hyperversal pressures to busy certain mega-populations or cut them off, in some respects, while also moving them toward hyper-assimilation. Major snafus can arise: “butterfly wing” distortions that magnify a given foul-up, or ailing regime-think.


In the worst cases, a healthy, independent biome may be seen as a direct challenge to a mega-population’s control. Why? Because a healthy, biologically diverse biome allows for long-term micro-evolution of a given people, instead of the cascading crises and manipulations preferred by an aggressive mega. There may be Big Brother pressures in such cases, a compulsion to foul, if not kill numerous species in order to expand a mega-population’s sphere of influence. Common sense suggests that manipulated planet death is the worst possible outcome, but an overgrown, aggressive colonial may want to play God, instead. We’ve heard (Verdant-related) talk about imposing non-physical social identities through mass extinctions, leaving but a shell of the old identity. Fawning acolytes of the IFSP - Intergalactic Federation of Sovereign Planets - call this “the Earth Changes” strategy, in our case. Destruction of the sort weakens a people, making it easier to control them.


Within a mega-population, we sometimes note a trance-like, resonant quality in those who insist that they aren’t “individuals” but are, instead, solely composed of group mind. Meanwhile, some individuals of the sort are middling characters who hide within the most amorphous of qualities and try define themselves only in spatial terms, a non— in the group sense. Dogmatic rigidity can creep into the equation, a smothering of critique within a given mega-population. Aging characters sometimes assume that they ALREADY DID all of the necessary thinking long ago, hence they need merely resonate and observe coldly, thereafter.

 

Some mega-population aliens may try to obliterate their own multiply-sourced history, and then pretend not to notice that their own, most specious rationalizations presume a mastery of insight on others’ pasts.


Some aliens within a mega-population may not be as thoughtful or insightful as were their elders of previous generations. So, when doubts and inadequacies arise, they may feel as though relatively immobilized, in a larger sense, given their shortcomings. Meanwhile, more thoughtful communities far exceed them. In one sense, the singular failings of some aliens are strangely gravitic, as though trapped and slowed—way down near an event horizon. We have literally observed this, as was noted previously. But how do we explain the slowed, seemingly trapped quality?


Two physicists, George Chapline of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Nobel laureate Robert Laughlin, have a new model of the universe that may offer insights. They suggest that black holes could, instead, be dark energy stars. Because objects falling into a black hole should stretch out so extremely that outside observers would note a freeze of time—which causes the object to appear to linger at the event horizon forever, physicists have searched for alternatives to the standard quantum model. Chapline and Laughlin note that when superconducting crystals go through “quantum critical phase transition,” electron spin doesn’t fluctuate wildly, as the standard model predicts it should. Instead, electron fluctuations slow down—as though time were literally slowed! So, Chapline and Laughlin came up with a startling, new explanation.


Working with colleagues, Chapline and Laughlin posit that instead of a black hole, a phase transition (a sudden change of state) creates a thin “quantum critical shell,” the size of which depends on a star’s mass. A New Scientist article on the subject says the shell doesn’t contain a space-time singularity….

“Instead, the shell contains a vacuum, just like the energy-containing vacuum of free space…. The team’s calculations show that the vacuum inside the shell has a powerful anti-gravity effect, just like the dark energy that appears to be causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate…. Quantum critical shells are a two-way street,” says Chapline.

He suggests that the energies involved match those of the expected dark energy of the entire universe. In other words, the universe could be a large, tendentious dark energy object (or object/non-object cycle), of sorts. It’s a useful model, and seems to agree with alien statements about negative energy and hyperspace (plus aspects of Bearden’s delta t).


So, how does that relate to the slowed and seemingly trapped quality of mistaken alien mindform? Aliens whose thoughts and deeds collapse in upon narrowly-construed, illusory self-assumptions may linger within a shell, of sorts, due to a failure of construct. Hence we observe a slowed quality, a redundancy that’s perhaps best modeled as a destructive enumeration (not so finely and fractionally universal). Ideally, more advanced hyperversals would know how to enter into such moments in order to warn such individuals about potentially ghastly ironies at the end of a universe cycle, should they fail to integrate more finely.


Meanwhile, in the best or most advanced of human cases, it’s normal to fade in and out of hyper-community, due to human tiredness and the need to rest. It isn’t so easy to maintain the requisite hyper-attentiveness while attending to daily routines.
Given our various interactions with mega-populations, to date, it is fairly easy to derive the basic implications of life
within such communities. However, we’re relatively new to such interactions and still have much to learn, over time.