Fom: “Dr Michael Salla” <exopolitics@yahoo.com>
Subject: [exopolitics] Anunnaki, Iraq, Stargates - Reply to
Michael Sokolov
Received: 10/8/2004 12:11:14 PM
Aloha All, here is a further exchange of correspondence I’ve had
with Michael Sokolov who has a fine grasp of Anunnaki history
and the role of Reptilian ETs which dovetails with much of my
own research. I’ve copied below a post I sent out on my
prepare4contact forum and the response that Michael Sokolov
sent. Michael’s response can be read by either clicking either
the URL at the start, or by reading it at the end of this post.
In peace
Michael Salla, PhD
drmsalla@exopolitics.org
Aloha Michael apologies for not replying earlier to your
response about the Anunnaki and their relationship with
mainstream religion (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prepare4contact/message/7789). I find myself in agreement with much of what you say and
think it is very valuable to emphasize the distinction between
the Anunnaki as human looking ETs and
the Reptilians as
basically being locked into a historical conflict over control
of humanity. I have just finished reading David Icke’s “Children
of the Matrix” and think that he basically simplified human
history in terms of his belief that the Reptilians are in
control of everything. As you know, in his view, Reptilians, the
Anunnaki are the same, and that we are locked into a
Prison
Planet with the same set of secret rulers -
the Illuminati who
are basically bloodlines associated with the Reptilians, mixed
in with some Nordic DNA.
The framework you outline in your article makes much more sense
and I’m happy to say that I reached the same conclusion with my
own research, the Anunnaki and the Reptilians are very different
and are competitors. The Illuminati are primarily associated
with the Anunnaki but as you say in your response to my earlier
article, there may have been significant infiltration or
compromising of this organization by the Reptilians who
dominate
mainstream religious institutions and also in my view military
institutions such as the US military.
Due to my political science background and work in the US, I
like to use political metaphors and kind of see the Anunnaki as
similar to Democrats and the Reptilians as a version of the
Republicans. The Democrats are more progressive and see humans
as having more intrinsic value, while Republicans are more law
and order types that like to carry the big stick. This is some
validation for your view that we need to get behind the Anunnaki
who have historically tried to assist humanity as exemplified in
the stories about Enki. You therefore conclude that
the Anunnaki
are supporting human liberation and deserve our support.
You write:
“But I don’t think that the present-day descendants
of Anunnaki, if they come into contact with us, would try to
control us like they did before.
The exopolitical situation now is totally different. We now have
a common enemy, and defeating them is far more important than
our petty differences. That is basically my main argument: we
can’t compare Anunnaki and reptiles side by side and say that
they are just vying for control and one is no better than the
other, because they are incomparable.
Anunnaki weren’t just “a
little more compassionate to us”, we ARE them basically, and
although yes, they did screwed up majorly a few times, those
wounds can be healed and we can move forward together, but the
dark forces of Yahweh are the enemy of Life itself. To use a
Tolkien analogy (Lord of the Rings), the differences between us
and Anunnaki are the little differences between humans, hobbits,
elves and dwarves/gnomes, but Yahweh is Sauron and USA is Mordor.”
As I said, I’m basically suspicious about
Anunnaki in terms of
their historical role and motivation and you’ve replied that
caution is necessary but that an alliance is important. I can go
along with that since these types of alliances are helpful in
changing the political dynamics between different ET races and
humanity. I do think though that rather than a dyadic conflict
between the Reptilians and Anunnaki, as you suggest with your
Lord of the Rings metaphor, that there is a third force involved
here which comprises the kinds of ET groups that I referred to
earlier which most regard as benevolent, e.g.,
Andromedans,
Pleiadians, Arcturians, etc. So the competition or struggle for
Earth is triadic. We have two interventionist factions,
Reptilians and Anunnaki who have different approaches to how to
manage the Earth, kind of like the Republican and Democrat
approaches, and we have a third faction which is
primarily
non-interventionist and use consciousness raising.
I think that our best allies are the non-interventionists, but
that alliances with ETs such as Anunnaki makes sense given the
present exopolitical situation on Earth.
Now what you say about the Anunnaki in terms of the invasion of
Iraq is significant and I wish to reflect a little on that. You
say:
“OK, it’s time for me to drop another bombshell. Brace yourself.
I believe
Saddam Hussein was/is a good guy. All the bad things
they say about him are reptilian propaganda. He undug some
ancient Anunnaki equipment and was able to reactivate it. He
reestablished contact with Anunnaki and was trying to bring them
back. That’s why they wanted him out.”
Now I certainly suspected that Saddam had found something and
that was why the US really went in. Most of the evidence I could
find in
my own paper and book chapter was circumstantial yet
when all put together was pretty persuasive. Fortunately,
whistleblowers such as
Dan Burisch were able to confirm this so
I felt pretty confident that I was on the right track. I’d like
to know any sources you used to support your similar conclusion
and to share this with us. Perhaps your Russian sources are more
forthcoming on why Uncle Sam went into Iraq?
The key now shifts to what it was that Saddam wanted to open
the Stargates for. Would it have been the Anunnaki who would have
come in with the desire to physically liberate the Earth from
the covert Reptilian control and thus support Saddam as a
‘righteous ruler’ or ‘good guy’ as you say; or would it have
been a Draconian Reptilian invasion force that would have
manipulated Saddam to basically impose overt Reptilian control
of Earth.
Whichever scenario it was, one could say that that the
Bush administration did the right thing with its foray into
Iraq
since it now effectively controlled the Stargate and prevented
an overt Reptilian or Anunnaki presence coming through that
would align itself with Saddam. I don’t see Saddam as a good guy
since he basically started a series of wars since he came to
power in 1978 that began with Iran and basically impoverished
his people.
Certainly no good guy in my book but from a certain
perspective he did offer an alternative to covert Reptilian
control and I see that is what you are getting at. At the same
time, I don’t feel we have enough information to know for sure
who would have come through the activated stargates, and the
consequences may well have been a more destructive regional war
involving overt intervention by ETs that would have sided with
Saddam.
I would appreciate any more information you have on what may
have come through the Iraqi stargates and why you feel so
confident it would have been the Anunnaki rather than
the Draco
Reptilians which is what I believe most commentators have
opined.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Michael S.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/prepare4contact/message/7789
Aloha Dr. Salla,
> Thank you for sharing your insights and reflections on
the
Anunnaki
> and Jehovah in your paper examining the
exopolitical history
of
> humanity
Thank you for the compliment!
> I also agree with you that a key historical event was the
> disappearance of
the Anunnaki around 2000 BC. Now your insight
here
> that this signified a take over by another group of
ETs led by
> Jehovah is very insightful.
I have also been able to scavenge enough data from the ancient
clues to construct a mathematical model of the orbit of
Nibiru /
Planet X, and guess what, in that fateful year 2024 BCE it was
precisely in its aphelion, the farthest out point. Think about
it, if you are an outsider seeking to attack the Anunnaki bases
on Earth, when would be the best time for attack?
I will present my model of the orbit of Planet X in my book,
along with the full chain of reasoning that led to it.
> This would explain why Yahweh could not be seen [...]
I have also pondered the possibility that
Yahweh did not want
anyone to see his physical form because he was so extremely ugly
and gross. Which brings us to the following thought... does
anyone remember the highly negative “disclosure briefing”
John
Lear gave to Art Bell last year? When he was “showing” the
18
alien species known to the
shadow government, he made a comment
about one of them:
“These are five-second slides of the
18 different alien species
we are looking at. That one there is the most gruesome-looking.
The guards at one facility are carefully indoctrinated over a
period of several months being shown pictures similar to but not
exactly like the alien. Only when they’d been acclimatized, so
to speak, to the horrible-looking beings are they allowed to
stand in security positions. Before these acclimatization were
done, we had two guards die of a heart attack as the aliens came
down the hallway unexpectedly.”
That made me wonder... I’m not even 100% sure of the
reptilian
nature, to be honest. Another candidate for this ugly monster is
the praying mantis alien. Some remote viewer has seen a
praying
mantis when peeking back into 1930s at some folks talking in
German about the atomic bomb.
Hmm, Yahwist reptilian-insectoids helping Nazis... But then we know
that Hitler was in fact a Jew, an illegitimate grandson of one
of
the Rothschilds.
(And for those wondering, my answer to the Lear Test is an
emphatic Yes.)
> It was another ET race, the
Reptilians, who basically came and
took
> over the Earth by gaining the allegiance of various tribes
such as
> the Hebrews.
. and I believe their methods involved mental takeover,
neuro-linguistic
programming (NLP) and Controlled Remote Influencing (CRI). I
will write more about this in my book.
> Now there
> are a couple of areas where it would be useful getting some
> clarification and a disagreement over who are the
best allies
of
> humanity in the present exopolitical situation on Earth.
OK...
> First, the role of
the Illuminati in what has been described
so far
> is critical.
Yes.
> Who exactly are they? Are they remnants of
the Anunnaki
> control that previously existed (my initial idea) or
extensions of
> the Reptilian takeover (Icke’s idea) or a combination of both?
I believe the former. Of course considering that the
Yahwists’
primary modus operandi seems to be mental takeover and
reprogramming, it is entirely possible and plausible that many
of the Illuminati have fallen to their side.
> My
> guess is that
the Illuminati are more closely aligned with the
>
Anunnaki which is why there has been historic conflict between
the
> Illuminati and Religious institutions such as
the Catholic
Church
> which presumably are bastions of Reptilian control.
Very sharp, that’s exactly my reasoning.
> E.g, the Knight
>
Templars and their destruction by the Catholic Church, here
the
> Anunnaki elite are destroyed by the Jehoavah/Yahweh based
elite.
Yes, and think about what got the
Templars in trouble in the
first place: they undug something in the ruins of Jerusalem,
which we know from Sitchin is the site of Anunnaki’s Command
Centre. Now think about these two questions:
1. What is the most restricted and most secure place on Earth
today?
It is not the White House. It is not the Pentagon. It is not
Kremlin. It is the Dome on the Rock in
Jerusalem. Or
Area 51.
One of those two.
Or rather they are probably about equal. Now what does it tell
you, the mere fact that those two can be listed side by side
like this? They are fundamentally of the same nature, major
ET
sites on Earth.
2. What is the never-ending conflict between
Israel and
Palestine all about?
It’s about Jerusalem. Even more
specifically, about who ought to own that Sacred Spot. It is the
apple of the dispute.
Now why is it so special? Why is it worth
risking World War III over? We know why it was so important in
the past - it was the Anunnaki Command Centre. But why is it so
important now? Merely because of its ancient history? I doubt
that. What if there is some interplanetary communication
equipment still operating there TODAY?
And one more point. We’ve all heard of
government mind control
and programming. They are putting programs in us. But think
about it: where are the programs coming from? I’m a computer
programmer by profession and know very well that programs need
to be written by programmers, distributed, etc. What if the
programs being beamed into our minds by the
shadow government
are being DOWNLOADED to Earth (from Alpha Draconis?) through the
interplanetary radio link at Mt. Moriah in Jerusalem and then
distributed further?
I have a lot more to say about that
Sacred Spot on Mt. Moriah,
but I will save the rest for my book. Stay tuned.
> In your analysis, if the Illuminati are associated with the
>
Anunnaki, they are the good guys.
Yes. I know this will be a great shocker to this whole community
which generally sees the Illuminati as the root of
all evil. This is one of the hardest to swallow bits of my
research. That’s why I don’t like just dropping this on people,
I want to ease it on through point-by-point reasoning and
evidence in my book. But you sort of prodded it out of me.
> The conflict in Iraq has
> echoes of this ancient conflict between the
Anunnaki and the Jehovah
> based religionists who are secretly a front for the
Reptilians. I’d
> be interested in hearing your thoughts on this.
I fully agree with you that the
war in Iraq is an exopolitical
conflict.
We independently reached the same conclusions. When the whole
saber-rattling about Iraq was just starting, I
realized from the
get-go what was going on: “oh great, invasion of Sumer”.
I was also very delighted to see your exopolitical comment about
the downing of
Space Shuttle Columbia on the eve of the invasion
of Eden, accompanied by the
Eye of Horus around the
Sun. When I
first heard about Columbia going down, I was quite delighted
that the Anunnaki got at least some small revenge for the
desecration and stomping of their holy land by the Yankees. That
was my immediate reaction, seeing your exopolitical comment was
a pleasant confirmation later. You and I are probably the only
two people on the planet who have made the connection between
the downing of Columbia and the war in Iraq. And then also
Columbia carried the first Israeli into space...
Anunnaki
weren’t very pleased, and I understand them.
OK, it’s time for me to drop another bombshell. Brace yourself.
I believe Saddam Hussein was/is a good guy. All the bad things
they say about him are reptilian propaganda. He undug some
ancient Anunnaki equipment and was able to reactivate it. He
reestablished contact with Anunnaki and was trying to bring them
back. That’s why they wanted him out.
And just recently I heard on Coast to Coast that
Saddam’s lawyer
argues for his client having a right to run in the Iraqi
elections, and some poll showing that 42% of Iraqis want him
back. Wouldn’t it be great if the Iraqis elect him
democratically? That would be a powerful message to the reptoids,
we don’t want Yahwists, Yankees and their lies here, we want our
true gods and goddesses, the Anunnaki, and our legitimate
President Saddam Hussein!
> The problem
> then shifts from
Reptilians per se, to hybrid human-Reptilians
that
> comprises the Enki faction of the Anunnaki.
“Problem”? Enki is not a “problem”, he was a hero and a saint in
my book! This is probably the area where I disagree with you and
a number of other people who think of Anunnaki as controlling
and manipulative.
It is true that Anu was very authoritarian, and his son
Enlil
(whose mother was Anu’s wife and half-sister Antu, i.e.,
pure Anu race) was the same way. Enki was very different. His mother
was one of Anu’s concubines, who I believe was a
Sirian queen or
princess.
So Enki was only half Anu race, the other half
Sirian.
His exopolitics was also totally different from Anu’s. While the
Enlilites indeed established an aristocratic social order in the
civilizations under their control, and I have to agree that they
were too controlling and undemocratic, I do not see a single
shred of evidence of any such controlling behavior on Enki’s
part. Enki managed the ancient Egypt, and note that all of
celestial alignments in the pyramids point to Sirius and the
belt stars of Orion, NOT to Rigel which is where I believe the
planet of Anu came from (I’ll explain this in my book).
Enki was NEVER interested in any manipulation and control of
humans, and he was always interested in giving humans as much as
possible in the way of civilization, wisdom and spirituality.
And his son Marduk even wanted to teach humans how to build
rockets and go to space in 3500 BCE! (I’m talking about the
Bab-Ili rocket launch tower of course.) After the nuclear
holocaust of 2024 BCE Enki, risking his own life, went around in
the radioactive fields of Shumer trying to use his scientific/magical
tricks to clean up the place as much as possible and to make
plants grow again.
> Now the final point I wish to make and where I feel we
disagree is
> with the idea that the Anunnaki are our allies in freeing the
earth
> from the Reptilians who use Jehovah/Yahweh/Allah as covers for
their
> secret domination of Earth. As I see it, there are
two ET
factions
> who have historically competed for control of Earth. By
choosing one
> faction over the other, presumably because it is genetically
more
> human and has shown evidence or being more compassionate than
the
> other, doesn’t appear to be very transformative to me.
Yes, we disagree a little here. I don’t believe that the
Enki
faction ever had any intent of domination and control, and
therefore they ought to perfectly qualify as our true allies. As
for the rest of the Anu clan, i.e., the Enlilites, they indeed
had a few undesirable qualities, and I agree with you that we
need to be careful with them. But I’m not saying that we should
revert totally to the old ways and just bow down to them. We
should welcome them as friends, but on new terms: as friends and
not as overlords.
But I don’t think that the present-day descendants of
Anunnaki,
if they come into contact with us, would try to control us like
they did before.
The exopolitical situation now is totally different. We now have
a common enemy, and defeating them is far more important than
our petty differences. That is basically my main argument: we
can’t compare Anunnaki and reptiles side by side and say that
they are just vying for control and one is no better than the
other, because they are incomparable.
Anunnaki weren’t just “a
little more compassionate to us”, we ARE them basically, and
although yes, they did screwed up majorly a few times, those
wounds can be healed and we can move forward together, but the
dark forces of Yahweh are the enemy of Life itself. To use a
Tolkien analogy (Lord of the Rings), the differences between us
and Anunnaki are the little differences between humans, hobbits,
elves and dwarves/gnomes, but Yahweh is Sauron and USA is Mordor.
(Speaking of Tolkien... I can’t help but notice a striking
similarity between his description of the elves and Altairans...
But of course like everything else, it’s just a coincidence...
grin)
> I think we can look beyond these two factions for a solution
and
> find the answer in other ET races that are not associated with
> either faction that are used to running the Earth. A number of
>
contactees have spoken of ET races from
Andromeda, Arcturus,
Sirius
> A., Pleiades, etc., who are also here trying to assist
humanity in
> its evolution.
Which brings us to my favorite slogan: Proletarians of all
planets, unite!
(It is of course derived from Karl Marx’ famous “Proletarians of
all counties, unite!”, and yes, I am a Communist and I’ll reveal
some startling Soviet-Anunnaki connections in my book.)
> However, I believe
> that even the
Anunnaki cannot be fully trusted due to
ingrained
> habits of control and elitism that would soon result in new
> institutions of power and control that would enslave/limit
portions
> of humanity.
Yes, and I certainly don’t suggest that we blindly entrust them
with everything, but again I believe in giving them a second
chance as friends rather than controllers, and I really believe
that they have learned a lesson and will now know that it’s much
better to cooperate rather than control, and that in open
cooperation we will be much stronger together and much more
effective in fighting the forces of darkness.
Love & light and Blessed Be,
Michael Sokolov
Engineer / Researcher / Truth seeker / Freedom fighter
