by
Dr. John Coleman
(with additional words by Dr. Byron Weeks)
STANFORD RESEARCH CENTER
Stanford Research Center (SRC) was founded in 1946 by the
Tavistock
Institute For Human Relations. Stanford was created to help Robert
O.
Anderson and his ARCO oil company, who had secured for
the Committee of
300 the oil rights on the North Slope of Alaska. Basically, the job was
too large for Anderson’s Aspen Institute to handle, so a new center had
to be founded and funded. That new center was Stanford Research Center.
Alaska sold its rights on a down payment of $900 million, a relatively
small amount for the Committee of 300. The governor of Alaska was
steered to SRI for help and advice. This was no accident but the result
of judicious planning and a process of long-range conditioning.
Following the governor’s call for help, three SRI scientists set up shop
in Alaska where they met with the Alaskan Secretary of State and the
State Planning Office. Francis Greehan, who headed the SRI team, assured
the Governor that his problem of how to handle the rich oil find would
be safe in the hands of SRI. Naturally Greehan did not mention
the
Committee of 300 or the
Club of Rome. In less than a month
Greehan
assembled a team of economists, petroleum scientists and new-science
scientists numbering in the hundreds. The report SRI gave to the
Governor ran to eighty-eight pages. The proposal was adopted virtually
without change by the Alaska legislature in 1970.
Greehan had indeed
done a remarkable job for
the Committee of 300. From this beginning SRI
developed into an institution employing 4000 people with an annual
budget of $160 million plus. Its President, Charles A. Anderson, has
seen much of this growth during his tenure, as has Professor Willis
Harmon, director of the SRI Center for the Study of Social Policies,
employing hundreds of new-science scientists, many of the top staffers
having been transferred from Tavistock’s London base. One of those was
RCA board chair-man and former British intelligence agent,
David
Sarnoff, who was closely involved with Harmon and his team for
twenty-five years. Sarnoff was something of a "watchdog" for the mother
institute in Sussex. Stanford claims to make no moral judgments on
projects it accepts, working for Israel and the Arabs,
South Africa and
Libya but, as one would imagine, by adopting this attitude it ensures an
"inside edge" with foreign governments that the CIA has found most
useful. In Jim Ridgeway’s book, "THE CLOSED CORPORATION," SRI spokesman
Gibson brags about SRI’s non-discriminatory stance. Although not on the
Federal Contract Research Center lists, SRI is today the largest
military think tank, dwarfing Hudson and Rand. Among SRl’s specialty
departments are chemical and biological warfare experimental centers.
One of Stanford’s more dangerous activities is counter-insurgency
operations aimed at civilian populations --just the sort of "1984" things
government is already using against its own people. The U.S. government
pays SRI millions of dollars each year for this kind of highly
controversial "research." Following student protests against chemical
warfare experiments conducted at Stanford, SRI "sold" itself to a
private group for just $25 million. Of course nothing really changed,
SRI was still a Tavistock project and the Committee of 300 still owned
it, but the gullible appeared to be satisfied by this meaningless
cosmetic change. In 1958, a startling new development arose. Advanced
Research Products Agency (ARPA), a contracting agency for the
Defense
Department, approached SRI with a top secret proposal.
John Foster at
the Pentagon told SRI that what was needed was a program to insure the
United States against "technological surprise." Foster wanted,
-
to perfect
a condition where the environment became a weapon
-
special bombs to
trigger volcanoes and/or earthquakes
-
behavioral research on potential
enemies
-
minerals and metals with potential for new weapons
The
project was accepted by SRI and codenamed "SHAKY." The massive
electronic brain in SHAKY was capable of carrying out many commands, its
computers having been constructed by IBM for SRI. Twenty-eight
scientists worked on what is called "Human Augmentation." The IBM
computer even has the capability to solve problems by analogy and
recognizes and identifies scientists who work with it. The "special
applications" of this tool can be better imagined than described.
Brzezinski knew what he was talking about when he wrote "THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA."
Stanford Research Institute works closely with scores
of civilian consulting firms, trying to apply military technology to
domestic situations. This has not always been a success, but as
techniques improve, the prospects for massive all-pervading
surveillance, as described by Brzezinski, daily becomes more real.
IT
ALREADY EXISTS AND IS IN USE, EVEN THOUGH SLIGHT MALFUNCTIONS FROM TIME
TO TIME HAVE TO BE IRONED OUT. One such civilian consulting firm was
Schriever McKee Associates of McLean, Virginia, run by retired
General
Bernard A. Schriever, a former chief of the Air Force Systems Command,
who developed the Titan, Thor, Atlas and Minuteman rockets.
Schriever
put together a consortium of,
-
Lockheed
-
Emmerson Electric
-
Northrop
-
Control Data
-
Raytheon
-
TRW,
under the name of URBAN SYSTEMS
ASSOCIATES, INC. The purpose of the consortium? To solve social and
psychological "urban problems" by means of military techniques
using
advanced electronic systems. It is interesting to note that TRW became
the largest credit information collecting company in the
credit-reporting business as a result and an outcome of its work with
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
This should tell us a great deal about just how far this nation is
already under TOTAL SURVEILLANCE, which is the first requirement of
the
Committee of 300. No dictatorship, especially not one on a global scale,
can function without total control over each and every individual.
SRI
was well on its way to becoming a key Committee of 300 research
organization. By the 1980’s, 60% of SRl’s contracts were devoted to
"Futurism" with both military and civilian applications. Its major
clients were the
-
U.S. Department of Defense-Directorate of Defense
Research and Engineering
-
Office of Aerospace Research which dealt with
"Applications of the Behavioral Sciences to Research Management"
-
Executive Office of the President
-
Office of Science and Technology
-
U.S. Department of Health
On behalf of the Department of Health,
SRI
ran a program called "’Patterns in ESDEA Title I Reading Achievement
Tests." Other clients were the,
-
U.S. Department of Energy
-
U.S.
Department of Labor
-
U.S. Department of Transportation
-
National
Science Foundation (NSF)
Of significance was the paper developed for
NSF, entitled "Assessment of Future and International Problems."
Stanford Research, under the tutelage of
Tavistock Institute in London,
put together a far reaching and chilling system it called "Business
Intelligence Program." In excess of 600 companies in the U.S. and abroad
became subscribers. The program covered research in,
-
Japanese Foreign
Business Relations
-
Consumer Marketing in a Period of Change
-
The
Mounting Challenge of International Terrorism
-
Sensory Evaluation in
Consumer Products
-
Electronic Funds Transfer System
-
Opto-Electric
Sensing
-
Exploratory Planning Methods
-
U.S. Defense Industry and
Capital Availability
Among the TOP Committee of 300 companies who
became clients of this program were,
But one of the most sinister of all SRI programs with the possibilities
of doing tremendous damage in altering the direction in which the United
States will go, socially, morally and religiously, was Stanford’s
Charles F. Kettering Foundation’s "CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN" under
Stanford official reference
"Contract Number URH (489)-2150 Policy
Research Report Number 4/4/74, Prepared by the SRI Center for the Study
of Social Policy, Director Willis Harmon."
This is probably one of the
most far-reaching investigations into how man might be changed that has
ever been conducted. The report, covering 319 pages, was written by 14
new science scientists under the supervision of Tavistock and 23 top
controllers including B. F. Skinner, Margaret Meade, Ervin Lazlo and
Sir
Geoffrey Vickers, a high-level British intelligence officer in
M16. It
will be recalled that his son-in-law, Sir Peter Vickers Hall, was a
founding member of the so-called conservative "Heritage Foundation."
Much of the 3000 pages of "recommendations" given to
the Reagan
administration in January 1981 were based upon material taken from
Willis Harmon’s "CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN." I was privileged to receive a
copy of "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN" from my intelligence colleagues
five days after it was accepted by the United States government. What I
read shocked me, as I realized I was looking at a blueprint for a future
America, unlike anything I had ever seen before. The nation was to be
programmed to change and become so accustomed to such planned changes
that it would hardly be noticeable when profound changes did occur. We
have gone downhill so fast since "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY" (the book
title of Willis Harmon’s technical paper) was written, that today,
divorce draws no stigma, suicide is at an all time high and raises few
eyebrows, social deviations from the norm and sexual aberrations, once
unmentionable in decent circles, are now commonplace and excite no
special protest.
As a nation we have not noticed how "CHANGING IMAGES OF MANKIND" has
radically altered our American way of life forever. Somehow we were
overcome by the "Watergate Syndrome." For a while we were shocked and
dismayed to learn that Nixon was nothing but a cheap crook who hobnobbed
with Earl Warren’s Mafia friends at the beautiful home they built for
him adjoining the Nixon estate. When too many "future shocks" and news
headlines demanded our attention, we lost our way, or rather, the huge
number of choices with which we were and still are daily confronted,
confused us to such a degree that we were no longer able to make the
necessary choices. The corrupt stench of the Reagan-Bush Administrations
we wanted covered with six feet of earth. The crimes committed under the
title of Iran/Contra affair (or scandals), we didn’t want uncovered. We
let our President lie to us regarding his whereabouts in the period
October 20-23rd, 1980. Yet these crimes far exceed in quantity and scope
anything Nixon did while he was in office. Do we as a nation recognize
it as going downhill with our brakes off?
No, we do not. When those whose business it is to bring the truth to the
American people that a private, well-organized little government inside
the White House was busy committing one crime after another, crimes
which attacked the very soul of this nation and the republican
institutions upon which it rested, we were told not to bother the public
with such things. "We really don’t want to know about all this
speculation," became a standard response. When the highest elected
official of the land blatantly put U.N. law above the Constitution of
the United States --an impeachable offense, the majority accepted it as
"normal." When the highest elected official of the land went to war
without a Congressional declaration of war, the fact was censored out by
the news media and, again, we accepted it rather than face the truth. In
this public attitude of the American people, the wildest dreams of
Willis Harmon and his teams of scientists became a reality.
The Tavistock Institute was elated at its success in destroying the self
respect and self esteem of this once great nation. We are told that we
won the Gulf War. What is not yet perceived by the vast majority of
Americans is that, in winning the war, it cost the self respect and
honor of our nation. That lies rotting in the desert sands of Kuwait and
Iraq, alongside the corpses of the Iraqi soldiers we butchered in the
agreed retreat from Kuwait and Basra --we could not keep our word that we
would abide by the Geneva Conventions and not attack them. "What do you
want," our controllers asked us, "victory or self respect? You can’t
have both."
One hundred years ago, this could not have happened, but now it has
happened and excites no comment. We have succumbed to the long range
penetration warfare waged against this nation by Tavistock. Like the
German nation, defeated by the Prudential Bombing Survey, enough of us
have succumbed to make this nation the kind that totalitarian regimes of
the past would have only envisaged in their dreams.
"Here," they would
say, "is a nation, one of the largest in the world, that doesn’t want
the truth. All of our propaganda agencies can be dispensed with. We
don’t have to struggle to keep the truth from this nation; they have
willingly rejected it of their own volition. This nation is a pushover."
Continued in
Volume Two
THE UNIVERSAL SEDUCTION
Piercing the Veils of Deception
Or go
HERE
|