| 
			
 
  by Karla Turner, Ph.D.
 from
			
			KarlaTurner Website
 
			  
				
					
						| 
						Reprinted with permission 
						by Elton Turner and Kelt Works, Inc.  
						This article was 
						originally published in The MUFON UFO Journal, #320 
						December 1994. 
 
						Karla Kandace Turner, Ph.D. was a highly 
						respected abduction researcher, author, lecturer, and 
						teacher. She received her Bachelor's degree from the 
						University of California in Sacramento, a Master's 
						degree from the University of Nottingham, Nottingham 
						England, and her Ph.D. from the University of North 
						Texas in Denton. She authored three books about the 
						abduction phenomenon: Into The Fringe, Taken, and 
						Masquerade of Angels.
 
 In 1995, Karla contracted a very dangerous form of 
						breast cancer immediately following an abduction 
						experience. She lost her battle with cancer on January 
						9, 1996 at the age of 48. Karla has been greatly missed 
						by those her knew her and by the many people she helped 
						through her books and research.
 |  
			  
			The seminal work of Budd Hopkins 
			first showed recurrent reproductive procedures performed on 
			abductees aboard UFOs or in alien facilities. And since the reports 
			gathered by subsequent researchers confirmed this data, it has 
			become a "given,"- a fact of ufology, that the primary purpose of 
			alien contact is to crossbreed or hybridize a new version of either 
			the aliens themselves or of us. 
 But is this a solid fact, a safe assumption?
 
			  
			The evidence upon which this assumption 
			is based is three-fold. First, reports say that genetic and 
			reproductive material are being harvested from abductees. Second, 
			abductees say the aliens have implanted fetuses into them and then 
			later retrieved the fetuses. Finally, the reports include scenarios 
			involving the "fetal nursery" and the presentation of a 
			hybrid-looking baby or child to the abductee, typically with claims 
			that the baby is the offspring of the abductee. 
 All of this evidence comes from abduction accounts, remembered both 
			consciously and under regressive hypnosis. To date, however, there 
			is no actual hybrid child in human custody, so the entire "fact" is 
			based solely on encounter reports. The accuracy of these reports is 
			questionable, given the nature of the abduction scenario. In every 
			encounter, the human's total perceptive intake is controlled and 
			frequently altered, easily manipulated to give the human a "created" 
			event to remember and a programmed set of tactile, emotional, and 
			intellectual responses. That means that what we abductees think and 
			what we remember of encounters may not accurately reflect the real 
			events of the encounter.
 
 Some researchers insist on accepting abduction accounts at face 
			value, however, but even if we grant the veracity of the reports, 
			there are still problems with accepting the "fact" of a 
			crossbreeding agenda. There are other feasible explanations for the 
			data used to support the hybridization theory that should be 
			considered.
 
 First, the genetic material harvested from abductees could be 
			intended for some other use than an upgraded alien species. For 
			instance, totally human clones, typically naked and inert or 
			inactive, are reported by abductees. The genetic materials could be 
			used in their production.
 
 Another possibility is that, as some abductees report being told or 
			shown, the small Gray "workers" are mass-produced android robots, 
			not soul-bearing individuals and thus not "alive" as we understand 
			the term. The Grays show a strong fetal physiology, as numerous 
			descriptions have stated.
 
			  
			And given enough mastery of genetics, 
			human reproductive material could be altered so that its appearance 
			resembled the Gray type, yet be strictly human in composition, 
			rather than a mixture of alien and human. The Grays, in effect, 
			could be grossly altered bodies of human babies, devoid of what we 
			call soul and mentally programmed like dedicated computer hardware.
 Similarly, the reported fetuses could be intended for 
			non-crossbreeding purposes, notably the same ones just discussed. 
			Remember, there is no hard evidence that the fetuses are actually 
			made from any alien-human combination, only an assumption based on 
			outward appearances and the pronouncements of the aliens.
 
 The reports of temporary fetal implantations into abductees, by the 
			way, are reproductively odd, to say the least. There are some 
			reports of male abductees receiving fetal implants, one in the 
			abdomen and another rectally. Both implants were later retrieved, 
			just as in the cases of female abductees. Even prepubescent children 
			are reported to have received fetal implants.
 
 There is also evidence that the fetuses, whatever their origin, are 
			not always treated as if they were precious experiments vital to the 
			survival of either our race or the aliens.
 
			  
			In a few instances, abductees report 
			watching as aliens deliberately destroy fetuses in the "fetal 
			nursery" scenario. In one instance, the abductee was told that she 
			shouldn't be upset because the fetus was not really alive, and that 
			all its physical material would be used, not wasted. In another 
			instance, the abductee was actually told that the reproductive work 
			and the fetuses were used in the manufacture of the Gray workers.
			 
			  
			She was told that the aliens were also 
			preparing "workers" for a coming time of destruction, because they 
			would need workers who were devoid of emotion.
 And the "baby presentations" have other possible interpretations 
			other than the nurturing of the hybrid offspring, which is what the 
			aliens typically claim. It might indeed be an actual event, but the 
			baby could be a strictly human product, not a crossbreed. The 
			purpose here might not be for a bonding process, since many 
			abductees say they don't feel any maternal connection to the baby. 
			One woman said she didn't believe the event was for bonding at all, 
			but rather was a tormenting process meant to be emotionally 
			traumatic for the "parent," as part of some programming agenda.
 
 On the other hand, the presentation might not be real at all. It 
			could be a virtual reality scenario. In such a case, the baby might 
			be something else altogether, or purely a projected image with no 
			physical reality. The event might be designed to give us 
			disinformation, misleading us about the true nature of their 
			genetics agenda and, indeed, about the true nature of our 
			relationship and worth to the aliens. If the agenda would seem 
			reprehensible to us, it would certainly serve their purposes to keep 
			us ignorant of it and to give us instead a more acceptable "cover 
			story."
 
 To muddy the waters even further, the aliens have indicated four 
			contradictory explanations for the genetics work.
 
				
					
					
					First, they have 
			said it was necessary to upgrade their declining race. 
					
					They have 
			also said that it is necessary to alter the human species so it can 
			survive some future destruction scenario. 
					
					Third, they have told some 
			abductees that they are here serving God's plan, by preparing "New 
			Bodies" for the coming Resurrection and return of Christ. 
					
					
					And 
			finally, they have said they are producing clones of certain 
			individuals, with which those individuals could be replaced. 
			Given the alternative possible explanations and the large body of 
			counter indicative data, as well as the conflicting explanations 
			offered by the aliens, can we safely accept hybridization as the 
			primary purpose at the heart of the alien agenda? Or should we be 
			more skeptical about their avowed intentions? 
 The evidence shows that the aliens do harvest from us in a number of 
			ways, emotionally and energetically as well as physically. There are 
			even reported scenarios of facilities in which human bodies are 
			"processed," and many such reports come from people unfamiliar with ufological literature.
 
 If we are indeed a multipurpose resource for the aliens, one which 
			they want to continue to use, could they be performing the various 
			reproductive/genetic procedures in order to make alterations in 
			their "livestock" that better serve the uses for which we are 
			harvested? Such a possibility should not be ruled out. There are 
			hypothetical reasons why these alterations might be necessary at 
			this particular time.
 
 If the aliens know, for example, that upcoming catastrophes or 
			earth 
			changes will be vastly destructive of their herd, they could be 
			working furiously to store up supplies in advance of the dearth, and 
			also perhaps trying to produce a variant human more capable of 
			surviving in some new environment on this planet. The aliens, in 
			fact, are fond of making predictions of catastrophic earth changes, 
			although they usually insist their genetic intrusions are 
			altruistic, for our benefit.
 
 Consider this: What if the aliens realize that their herd is showing 
			changes that the aliens didn't intend and don't like? They could be 
			furiously working to stem this transformative process. They may fear 
			that the herd is waking up, gaining new perceptive abilities, and 
			learning that its purpose is nothing more than livestock.
 
			  
			After all, the herd might be so unhappy 
			with that situation that they might decide to resist it. What would 
			be the alien response to such a situation? If all the livestock we 
			use on this planet suddenly woke up and decided they didn't want to 
			"serve Man" any longer, would we all acquiesce quietly and become 
			vegetarians?
 
			  |