Chromosome
Fusion
Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant
past?
Monday, April 10, 2006
The Human Genome Project has dished up some real surprises to
scientists. The first surprise was the vast percentage of the human
DNA that is inactive. It is estimated that at least 97% of our DNA
is in actual fact a waste of space, as it does not contain any
active genes that actually carry the code for any of our physical
makeup. Then within the genes there are Introns – parts that do not
carry any code; and Exons - sections that carry some sort of genetic
code. The full length of our DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes
that have now been identified.
These genes carry the blueprint for the
structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is the fact that
Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if civilized evolution on
this planet, should have such large parts of unused DNA. We seem to
have the longest DNA molecule among all other species, but we use
the smallest part of it in proportion to the other species. In other
words, all the other creatures use much more of their DNA than
humans do. Some species use as much as 98% of their DNA.
This flies directly in the face of the principles of evolution.
Humans should have the most complex and evolved DNA of all
creatures, to have reached levels of civilization seemingly much
higher than any other species on Earth over millions of years of
evolution. What is even more curious is the predicted number of
genes in species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic
organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that humans should
end up having most genes, but strangely this is not the case.
Here
are some examples of the predictions for total number of genes in
species.
-
Fruit Fly 21 000
-
Zebrafish 50 000
-
Chicken 76 000
-
Mouse 81 000
-
Chimp 130 000
-
Human 68 000
Can you see the problem here? The Chimp is our closes know genetic
relative and yet it has almost twice as many genes as humans. And
then we get to the anomaly of the chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up
into 23 pairs of chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs.
One would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate evolutionary
precursor would then also have had 24 chromosome pairs.
Just one year ago on 6 April 2005, researchers from the National
Human Genome Research Institute announced that,
“A detailed analysis
of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected the largest “gene deserts” known
in the human genome and uncovered more evidence that human
chromosome 2 arose from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes”
as reported in Nature.
It is also the second largest chromosome we
possess and it seems to make no sense why 2 primordial chromosomes
should have merged to make us human, if this new chromosome gives us
no apparent advantage for survival.
So when we read in the Sumerian tablets
that humans were cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a
more advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some 400 000
years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more sense. The tablets
describe how our maker removed certain parts of the “Tree of life”
to trim the ability of the new “creature” and how they struggled to
make the perfect “primitive worker” so that it could understand
commands but not be too smart to question their existence. Similar
suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and Hindu Laws
of Manu.
The Koran:
• Ya Sin: “Is man not aware that We
created him from a little germ?”
• The Believers - God says almost verbatim what the Sumerian
tablets tell us. “We first created man from an essence of clay;
then placed him a living germ in a secure enclosure. The germ we
made a clot of blood, and the clot a lump of flesh. This we
fashioned into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh…”
Laws of Manu:
• 19. But from minute body
(-framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas
springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.
• 20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality
of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each
of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to
possess.
Notice the reference to “We” by the
creator. The cloning of humans as a more primitive worker or “lulu amelu” suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange genetic
anomalies seem to support some genetic manipulation in our distant
past. The modern-day researchers go further to say that this
“fusion” of our chromosome 2 is what makes us human.
Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created by his
MAKER as slaves to work in the early gold mines on Earth? It
certainly seems like it.
Michael Tellinger
April 2006
Back to Contents
|