MILITARY READINESS QUESTIONS

Why won’t the military just tell the truth about what they know about the aliens? I can handle the truth.

The government has kept the UFO and alien agenda threat information secret from the public with VERY good reason. The Brookings Report was only the start. They let that study out to let people know that if they did have knowledge of an alien threat, that they couldn’t tell it for the protection of society in general. It’s not “what you don’t know won’t hurt you,” it’s we can’t tell you because it would terrorize too many people, resulting in suicides, mental breakdowns, homicides, religious revolts, and other upheavals in society.

The military knew what had to be done and for the last 30+ years has been building a defense at the same time they were waging psychological warfare domestically to divert attention from the problem, misinform, discredit witnesses, etc., to keep both the alien information and our military preparations under wraps. The problem is that there are people here and in other countries that couldn’t handle the truth and would be driven mad. So the truth had to positively be kept secret. They did the right thing.

Why do black helicopters show up at abduction sites?

The US military apparently has a covert program to monitor the abduction activities of the Grays. The black helicopters that show up at the houses of abductees are from a special military group (I believe it is Special Forces, because the home base for the black helicopters is Fort Campbell, Kentucky). They monitor the implant frequencies, and when they detect that the Grays have activated the transponder (locator beacon) in someone’s implant, they will have a few armed black helicopters (if they are nearby) fly out to the location of the abductee and monitor the situation to make sure it is only a routine abduction, and not the start of a major harvest.

In most cases the helicopters can arrive at the location before the aliens, because the aliens activate the transponders of several people they intend to pick up, as much as three hours before they actually arrive. There was a lady who was a multiple abductee in the Midwest who had as many as 5 black helicopters show up and continue to fly around her house for 3 hours before the Grays arrived to abduct her. On one occasion 3 helicopters followed her as she drove her car around town for 3 hours. Then they flew around her house until the Grays came and picked her up.

I am fairly certain that several of those helicopters are fitted with a drive system and reactor similar to the ones that power the alien craft. I believe this because there have been reports of the black helicopters being seen flying completely silent and then suddenly vanishing (just the same way the UFOs vanish when they instantly accelerate to very high speed). I am fairly sure those units are armed with advanced weapons like lasers, particle beam weapons, RF weapons, etc. The weapons could easily and most probably be powered by an onboard reactor (a copy of the alien model).

This information is not in the public domain. I put it together based on the observed facts. I think the super fast helicopters may also be used to quickly get to a distant location where a UFO may have been spotted (by NORAD) abducting people who have not been implanted yet. Again, they are probably checking to see if it is an individual abduction, and not a large harvest starting. The black helicopters won’t start anything unless they have to.

They want the Grays to think we are no match for them. Also if the Grays accidentally crash, the helicopters are on site to cover it up and recover the craft and bodies before the news media arrives. They cover their asses pretty well in all respects. There is a small chance I may be wrong in this, that is why I said in effect that I was making an educated guess, based on all available facts. Try evaluating the situation yourself. How do you explain the fact that our helicopters are able to show up at an abduction site before the aliens arrive?

NOTE: This has happened to the mother of a friend of mine here in Florida. The other reports are from Budd Hopkins.

“In my opinion” the helicopters sent to monitor the abductions are heavily armed “Q-Ships,” that can do whatever is necessary, armed with weapons systems that can neutralize an alien craft if needed. The helicopters are not seen with external weapons mounted because rockets, 20 MM cannon, or machine guns, as they are inadequate speedwise to neutralize an advanced alien craft. You can bet your bottom dollar they are not just “unarmed observers.”

Even the US Coast Guard does not go into a “situation” unarmed. Those choppers are “most likely” flown by US Army pilots, who are “most likely” Special Forces pilots. I am “drawing that conclusion” based on information that the black choppers are based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky. For the certain people here who are whining about “proof,” this is an exercise to make “known facts” fit into a “hypothesis.” There won’t be any proof forthcoming on the black helicopter operations.

They are clandestine in nature, and active military personnel involved would be under orders and legal restraint to never discuss them. All I am saying is “this is what I see, so this is what I think is happening.” If you were on a fishing boat off the coast of Cuba and every day saw a U-2 spy plane fly over Cuba, you would guess that we had an operation going to spy on Cuba. That is all I am doing. I am making a highly educated guess on what the operations of the black helicopters entail, based on “what they have been seen doing” by eyewitnesses known to me, and reports from other credible UFO researchers like Budd Hopkins.

If you are unfamiliar with the historical operations of the black helicopters, I can understand why this would all sound alien to you, (so to speak). There are also reports that black helicopters have been seen hovering near areas where mutilated cattle have been found. That could be because they are checking on what the Grays have been doing to those cattle.

I was informed by a European member of a UFO forum I belong to that black helicopters have been seen in Europe. I asked him the following questions:

• What countries in Europe have these black helicopters been spotted in?

• Do you know what air bases they are based at?

• Do you know what country operates them?

• Are they US, UK, French, or German manufactured helicopters?

• Have you heard if they have exhibited any unusual flight characteristics, like silent operation or instantaneous acceleration to high speed?

He answered: These black helicopters have been sighted and filmed repeatedly in England, in one instance filmed seemingly chasing some crop circle investigators away from a crescent marking. They are especially common near Stonehenge, which is near a RAF base. The copters have also been seen in England near Arbofield RAF base that allegedly has secret hangers dug into the ground.

Helicopters have repeatedly sent researchers running when trying to film this area of the base. This has been shown on TV. They have been spotted in Europe, but the reports are scarcer. (Although this may have to do with fewer people reporting them). However there have been reports which I read about in Borderlands by Mike Dash of these helicopters being sighted flying en masse over Berlin for some reason. The most common description of the black helicopter seems to match that of a BELL SH-34 helicopter, (BELL being the firm that manufactured the HUEY).

However they do not always behave in this manner and yes there have been reports in England of these copters making no noise but they are exceptionally rare. Normally these helicopters behave and sound like the norm. This type of helicopter is used all over the world, so a country of origin is hard to gauge. I’ve heard of no cases this side of the pond where sudden acceleration has occurred, but I could be wrong.

My take on this: It sounds like those “modified” helicopters are based at RAF bases because the RAF is using them. I am convinced those helicopters have been equipped with advanced weapons systems like laser or RF and have been deployed to be in place as a last ditch line of defense against an alien harvest of humans.

Think of them as a local force that can quickly respond to a local threat. If the aliens ships show up where the helicopters are situated (near population centers, obviously), the UFOs can be jumped quickly by these helicopters that can approach at low altitude using terrain to mask their approach to achieve tactical surprise.

It is hard to do that with a flight of F-16s. The UFOs will be down close to the ground on their abduction mission, limiting the range of whatever they use as radar. They won’t be able to see the helicopters until it is too late. Our spy satellites would be able to spot any UFOs and vector the helicopters toward them.

That would eliminate the helicopter’s need for the “search” part of search and destroy. NORAD would already know where they are, and would direct the helicopters where they need to go. In the US they will stand by and monitor the UFOs as they abduct individual people. If it looked like the start of a mass harvest, then I think the helicopters will open fire.

How would you explain people being abducted from military bases and prisons, two of the most heavily armed institutions in the world?

You said it! The “institutions” are armed, not the inhabitants. Soldiers on base and prisoners in jail are easy targets. Neither is armed. Weapons on a military base are kept locked up in armories until issued. Ammunition is kept locked up separately until issued too. Soldiers in the barracks don’t sleep with their rifles, or ammo.

Prisoners do not usually carry firearms either. Both soldiers and prisoners are sitting ducks for abduction because they can be abducted by the aliens right through the walls of the institutions they reside in with little fuss. Even prison guards are not armed with guns while inside the prison. Their guns are kept locked up too and only issued if there is a riot. Remember Attica? So the Grays would look at military barracks and prisons as a big, free meat market.

Is HAARP really a weapons system? The HAARP web site claims it is used for research on the Aurora Borealis. The Air Force and Navy have spent an awful lot of money just to “study” the aurora. Could the aurora possibly have some qualities that would allow it to be used as a super weapon? Has the military been keeping secret another Bermuda Triangle, an Aurora Triangle?

Pardon my sarcasm, but I don’t think any practical use will ever be found for the aurora. The military would be better off studying rainbows. At least there’s a chance of finding a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow. If you want to know what HAARP was originally designed to do, you have to read the patent. It is an eye-opener. The patent on the HAARP system was declassified in 1999 and can be read in its entirety on the US patent office site (www.uspto.gov).

The patent itself (#4,686,605) says it is a multifunction weapons system. In fact it is one of the most awesome weapons systems ever. The following text is copied verbatim from the HAARP patent description. This section lists several of the weapons uses for the invention:

The plasma of the typical example might be employed to modify or disrupt microwave transmissions of satellites. If less than a total blackout of transmission is desired (e.g., screened only be at least about 10.sup.6 per cubic centimeter) for a plasma originating at an altitude of from about 250 to about 400 km and accordingly less energy (i.e., electromagnetic radiation), e.g., 10.sup.8 joules need be provided.

Likewise, if the density of N.sub.e is on the order of 10.sup.8, a properly positioned plume will provide a reflecting surface for VHF waves and can be used to enhance, interfere with, or otherwise modify communication transmissions (e.g., scrambling by phase shifting digital signals), the density of the plasma (N.sub.e) It can be seen from the foregoing that by appropriate application of various aspects of this invention at strategic locations and with adequate power sources, a means and method is provided to cause interference with or even total disruption of communications over a very large portion of the Earth.

 

This invention could be employed to disrupt not only land-based communications, both civilian and military, but also airborne communications and sea communications (both surface and subsurface).

This would have significant military implications, particularly as a barrier to or confusing factor for hostile missiles or airplanes. The belt or belts of enhanced ionization produced by the method and apparatus of this invention, particularly if set up over Northern Alaska and Canada, could be employed as an early warning device, as well as a communications disruption medium.

 

Further, the simple ability to produce such a situation in a practical time period can by itself be a deterring force to hostile action. The ideal combination of suitable field lines intersecting the Earth’s surface at the point where substantial fuel sources are available for generation of very large quantities of electromagnetic power, such as the North Slope of Alaska, provides the wherewithal to accomplish the foregoing in a practical time period, e.g., strategic requirements could necessitate achieving the desired altered regions in time periods of two minutes or less and this is achievable with this invention, especially when the combination of natural gas and magnetohydrodynamic, gas turbine, fuel cell and/or EGD electric generators are employed at the point where the useful field lines intersect the Earth’s surface.

 

One feature of this invention which satisfies a basic requirement of a weapons system, i.e., continuous checking of operability, is that small amounts of power be generated for operability checking purposes. Further, in the exploitation of this invention, since the main electromagnetic beam which generates the enhanced ionized belt of this invention can be modulated itself and/or one or more additional electromagnetic radiation waves can be impinged on the ionized region formed by this invention as will be described in greater detail herein after respect to FIG. 4, a substantial amount of randomly modulated signals of very large power magnitude can be generated in a highly nonlinear mode.

 

This can cause confusion of or interference with or even complete disruption of guidance systems employed by even the most sophisticated of airplanes and missiles. The ability to employ and transmit over a very wide area of the Earth a plurality of electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies and to change same at will in a random manner, provides a unique ability to interfere with all modes of communications, land, sea, and/or air, at the same time.

 

Because of the unique juxtaposition of usable fuel source at the point where desirable field lines intersect the Earth’s surface, such wide ranging and complete communications interference can be achieved in a reasonably short period of time. Because of the mirroring phenomenon discussed herein above, it can also be prolonged for substantial time periods so that it would not be a mere transient effect that could simply be waited out by an opposing force.

 

Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth’s atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art, particularly by the detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes.

 

Where the prior art approaches yielded merely transitory effects, the unique combination of fuel and desirable field lines at the point where the fuel occurs, allows the establishment of, compared to prior art approaches, precisely controlled and long-lasting effects which cannot, practically speaking, simply be waited out.

Further, by knowing the frequencies of the various electromagnetic beams employed in the practice of this invention, it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a communications network even though the rest of the world’s communications are disrupted.

 

Put another way, what is used to disrupt another’s communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communications network at the same time. In addition, once one’s own communication network is established, the far reaching extent of the effects of this invention could be employed to pick up communications signals of other for intelligence purposes.

 

Thus it can be seen that the disrupting effects achievable by this invention can be employed to benefit by the party who is practicing this invention since knowledge of the various electromagnetic waves being employed and how they will vary in frequency and magnitude can be used to an advantage for positive communication and eavesdropping purposes at the same time. However, this invention is not limited to locations where the fuel source naturally exists or where desirable field lines naturally intersect the Earth’s surface. For example, fuel, particularly hydrocarbon fuel, can be transported by pipeline and the like to location where the invention is to be practiced.

 

<End HAARP patent Section>

As you can see, HAARP was designed as a versatile all around weapons system. I believe they made the patent public so that any country that wanted to copy it to defend Earth could do so. The patent does not mention aurora research.

If HAARP is a weapons system, how are its targets identified and designated? Where is the command post that operates the HAARP sites, directing and controlling its firepower?

I believe that all of the HAARP sites are coordinated and controlled by NORAD headquarters. They operate the deep space satellites that watch for incoming mother ships. They monitor the space and air space all around the Earth. This became evident in an incident that was discussed earlier in this book. A visitor in the NORAD control room witnessed a UFO being identified and attacked using a powerful “Radar” system.

I believe the Radar system that was ordered to “boost” its power to knock down the large UFO was one of the HAARP sites. What better place to direct those weapons systems than the eyes, ears, and brain center of the military; NORAD. APTI, Inc., HAARP’s manufacturer states: The radiation beam can be shaped to reduce sidelobes and can be rapidly scanned to 30 degrees off zenith in all directions.

The latter is accomplished through the application of a state-of-the-art digital control system. The control center for the array is engineered to be user friendly and is easily adaptable to remote operations from centers around the world.

Will our military have a problem if we are attacked by other countries that the aliens have goaded into going after us?

The following article from Newsmax.com spells it out:

United States is Unprepared for War
Newsmax.com
3/17/99
Christopher Ruddy

At the same time that Russia has been building an enormous war machine and making war preparations, the US has been slashing its strategic nuclear arsenal, mothballing ships, and eliminating entire military battle groups. Equally suicidal, Clinton has cut troop levels in the US Army by 40% and the Air Force, Navy and Marines by over 30%.

Clinton has also tied up many of America’s best troops in endless and futile foreign quagmires, including “peacekeeping” in Bosnia and the Middle East, humanitarian projects in Africa, and drug interdiction in Latin America. Few troops are left to defend the United States. Clinton also had been throwing away America’s limited arsenal of cruise missiles. These missiles were primarily built to deliver strategic nuclear warheads deep into Russia.

 

Russia is believed to be vulnerable to such weapons because they evade radar and fly low to the ground. ABC News reports that before Operation Desert Fox (our recent, undeclared war on Iraq) the US had just 239 cruise missiles left. In the first few days of Desert Fox Clinton ordered that over 90 of these precious cruise missiles be fired on Iraq against what has proven to be mainly empty warehouses and radar installations that were rebuilt in days.

 

As this article is being written, additional cruise missiles have been launched in continuing confrontations with Iraq. Each missile expended in Iraq is one less that can be used to defend the US — and at the current rate of expenditure, the US military would have none left in less than 30 days. Why is Bill Clinton squandering these crucial weapons? This question becomes even more serious when one considers that the US is not currently making cruise missiles and has no plans to do so.

 

And this is just one way that, under Clinton, America is being stripped of its ability to defend itself. Never before has the US been so ill-prepared to defend its own territory and citizens. Here are the chilling facts:

1. The United States has practically no civil defense system to protect its citizens from a biological, chemical or nuclear attack.

2. The United States has no antiballistic missile system to protect against incoming missiles.

3. US defense spending has been dramatically reduced, from about 28 percent of the federal budget in 1988 by almost half, to 17 percent today. Former Secretary of Defense, Casper Weinberger, states in his book The Next War: “...the United States has embarked on a massive disarmament. Since 1985, military budgets have declined 35%. Spending on research and development has been slashed by 57%, and procurement of newly produced weapons by a whopping 71%.”

4. US Naval forces have been slashed. These forces are vital for protecting the US against foreign threats such as Mid-Eastern terrorism and potential attacks on allies like Taiwan and South Korea. Today the Navy only has 336 ships compared to over 600 in 1991. That’s the lowest number of ships since the late 1930s.

More frightening is the fact that US naval surface ships have been stripped of their tactical nuclear weapons. Even though the US Navy is still much larger than Russia’s or Chinas, without nuclear weapons the US fleets are sitting ducks for Russian and Chinese nuclear weapons.

5. The critical balance of nuclear weapons between Russia and the United States has tilted in Russia’s favor. If intelligence estimates are accurate, the US and Russia share an almost equal number of strategic nuclear weapons, but Russia has a huge advantage in tactical nuclear weapons.

The Clinton administration has systematically destroyed the US stockpile of tactical nuclear weapons. Under Clinton, the total number of tactical nukes has dropped from approximately 20,000 weapons in 1988 to a few thousand today. And every day, under Clinton’s orders, the military destroys more tactical nuclear weapons.

Even with these cuts, the Clinton administration is still not happy, and has pushed the Pentagon to seek unilateral cuts well below the current Start I floor of 6,000 strategic weapons.

6. US military preparedness is at the lowest level in 50 years. On March 20, 1998, the General Accounting Office reported to Congress on the preparedness of the five of the Army’s ten divisions that would deploy in the second wave of an overseas war. The results were grim:

• 1st Infantry Division — the division’s 1st brigade had only 56% of the personnel needed to fill its armored vehicles. Many brigades were only partially filled or had no personnel at all assigned to them.

• 25th Infantry Division — 52 of 162 infantry squads were “minimally filled or had no personnel assigned.”

• 1st Armored Division — only 16 of the unit’s 116 tanks had full, battle-qualified four-man crews.

• 4th Infantry Division — 13 of 54 squads in the divisions engineer brigade either had no personnel or fewer personnel than required.

7. America is paying for Russia’s rearmament. Under programs like Nunn-Lugar, the US has paid Russia billions to dismantle nuclear warheads because Russia said it did not have the money to pay for it (odd, since they have plenty of money to build new missiles, aircraft carriers, and submarines). By funding these expensive warhead dismantling programs for Russia’s obsolete weapons, the US has enabled the Russians to divert millions of dollars to building new weapons.
 

8. President Clinton has unilaterally changed more than four decades of US defense policy of “launch on warning.” Under a secret Clinton directive — known as a Presidential Decision Directive or PDD — issued in November of 1997, the United States would accept a first strike and only retaliate after millions of our citizens had been killed.

 

Some of the details of the PDD were leaked to the Washington Post (12/7/97). The Post reported that the Clinton administration was unilaterally changing America’s nuclear defense posture. Clinton’s PDD directed the US military to no longer plan to win a nuclear war with Russia.

Just weeks after the Washington Post report, on December 23, Robert Bell gave an interview to Arms Control Today. Bell, senior director for defense policy and arms control at the National Security Council, helped draft the PDD. Bell revealed more astounding details of the PDD and Clinton’s new policy: “In this PDD we direct our military forces to continue to posture themselves in such a way as to not rely on launch on warning — to be able to absorb a nuclear strike and still have enough force surviving to constitute credible deterrence,” Bell said.

 

Bell continued, “Our policy is to confirm that we are under nuclear attack with actual detonations before retaliating.” In other words, Clinton is willing to wait until American cities, military installations, and our vulnerable land-based ICBMs are devastated before counterattacking. If, God forbid, such a surprise attack was launched, most of the US’s strategic weapons would be destroyed and there would be little left to retaliate with.

Clinton’s new launch policy is an invitation for Russia to attack. With the US prevented from launching on warning, a Russian first strike could wipe out two of the three legs of America’s strategic defense triad: land-based missiles and strategic bombers.

At any given time, 6 of America’s 18 ballistic missile submarines are in port and would probably be destroyed in a Russian first strike under the Clinton doctrine. All that would be left to defend America would be 12 ballistic submarines with 180 megatons of warheads. That’s over less than 50% of the 400 megatons required under MAD to deter Russia. [MAD refers to the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction, a policy that kept America safe in the nuclear age.]

Given Russia’s missile defense system, modernized weapons, and vast system of underground shelters, it is easy to see why Russia might find launching a first strike against America tempting and any loses they would suffer “acceptable.”

Russia could destroy every major American city and military target, and suffer only limited retaliation against its own cities even if America fired every surviving nuclear weapon. After America launched its handful of surviving missiles, Russia would still have tens of thousands of weapons in their arsenal, making them the only military superpower on Earth and the world’s likely rulers.

Further evidence that Clinton has diabolically sought to undermine America’s nuclear arsenal, are his numerous proposals to “de-alert US nuclear forces. Clinton claims that the real risk of war is from the US accidentally launching nuclear weapons. To prevent such an “accident,” the Washington Times reports that the Clinton administration plans on “removing the integrated circuit boards from ICBMs and storing them hundred of miles away, taking the warheads off the MX missile or possibly the Minuteman ICBMs, welding shut the missile hatches of some submarines, and doubling the number of orders a hard-to communicate with submarine would have to receive before it could launch a missile.”

The purpose of these changes would be to increase the time to launch a weapon from minutes, to hours or even days. The truth is that in a nuclear war an unlaunched weapon may never be launched.

Since Clinton can make such policy changes by issuing a secret PDD, these dangerous moves can be made without informing the public or Congress. There are some indications that, in fact, Clinton has taken steps to make it more difficult for our submarines to launch their missiles.

9. America’s land-based Missiles are vulnerable. The Defense Department estimates that Russia would only need to fire about 15 percent of its ICBMs to destroy two-thirds to 85 percent of US silos. In contrast, Peter Vincent Pry, a former CIA analyst, reports that Russia’s ICBMs are “in harder silos and on mobile launchers — making them less vulnerable to an American counterattack.”

10. The United States has not sanctioned Russia for the breaking the ABM treaty and many other arms control treaties we have signed with them — including bans on biological and chemical weapons, weapons modernization, and construction of vast underground bunkers.
Why hasn’t the Clinton Administration made receipt of aid from the US, IMF and the World Bank (which are controlled by the US), conditional upon Russia demilitarization or at least their abiding by the treaties they have signed? Why does the US and UN continue to pour tens of billions of dollars into Russia while they are building a vast war machine and apparently preparing for war?
 

11. Foreign deployment of troops leaves the US vulnerable to foreign military occupation. US troops are currently deployed in some 160 countries, with large deployments in Bosnia and the Mid-East. Nyquist argues that foreign deployment is an ominous sign, since the United States would not have an army to protect the United States proper. Since Nyquist made those comments, President Clinton has sent tens of thousands of US troops to the Mideast, along with most of our naval forces and strategic bombers. This is extremely dangerous, since by deploying our strategic bombers overseas, they are cutoff from their nuclear weapons and are sitting ducks for a Russian attack.

<End Article>

Sounds like any punk country can KO us. What is so dangerous about not having the old levels of conventional military forces? Naval vessels and US Army soldiers can’t be used to fight advanced aliens in spacecraft.

Conventional military forces are still needed to protect the US from the conventional military forces of Earthly adversaries. If we are attacked by rogue states like North Korea, Iran, or Communist China, we have to be able to defend ourselves from both nuclear and conventional annihilation.

If we cease to exist as a power capable of thwarting an alien attack because we were wiped out by a nuclear sneak attack or an invasion by millions of human enemy troops, there will be no country left to defend the rest of humanity from the aliens. The aliens won’t wipe out humanity. They will allow mankind to slide back into the old patterns of serial wars of all types, to once again generate fresh meat on demand for their future needs.

So it is critical that we have sufficient military strength to deter enemies on Earth from even thinking about attacking us.

George Washington said, “To be prepared for war is the most effectual means of preventing war.” Downsizing our military is also a mistake these days because shorthanded forces cannot mount a rapid response to attacks on our allies. We need to be able to fight simultaneously in two theaters of war.

It took several months to move men and material to the Gulf to fight Saddam Hussein. Iraq was not attacking our logistical effort to move our military assets into the area either. If we were up against North Korea and/or Red China, incoming men and equipment would be under fire on the way to the war zone by enemy naval and air forces.

Think back to the Korean War when we were fighting North Korea and Red China. We currently do not have enough conventional military forces to re-fight the Korean War. We can’t use nuclear weapons there because China and North Korea both have nuclear weapons, and planes and missiles to deliver them. If South Korea or Taiwan comes under attack, we currently do not have the means to defend them.

A large rapid response force is needed to guarantee the safety of our allies and us. Having the ability to quickly project military power on a vast scale is the only way to keep a lid on expansionist plans of the Red Chinese military. We definitely can’t fight a two front war where one is here and the other one is against Reptoids in space. Besides, having a large number of trained military personnel may come in handy if there is large-scale attrition of our men in the space defense arena.

There would be no time for the basic training of needed replacements. We may really need “Minute Men” who are ready to fight right now. I am sure the aliens will not stand around while we assemble a fighting force to go up against them. But then, the Red Chinese won’t give us any breathing room either.

Are the Russians deploying any anti-alien weapons systems?

There is a HAARP facility in Russia manned by their people and our people. The Russians have a very large network of nuclear tipped surface to air (SAM) missiles. What is strange about that is they are not supposed to have them under the ABM Treaty with the US. American inspection teams found evidence of what is going on, but it has been officially ignored.

The Tuesday, March 10, 2001 Wall Street Journal had an article written by Melanie Kirkpatrick titled “Does Russia Already Have A National Missile defense?” It is pointed out that the Russians have 8,000 advanced nuclear SAMs capable of hitting an incoming nuclear ICBM warhead in space, all controlled by the latest battle management radar, the entire network being controlled by a central command in Moscow.

All of that is illegal under treaty but our government has said nothing to the Russians about the flagrant violations of the treaty. I think our government considers it more important for the Russians to give a warm nuclear welcome to our mutual alien adversary, so our government did not object to the massive buildup.

Crop Circles
I had avoided discussing crop circles because they did not pose a threat to us. However the subject kept coming up because people asked me where they fit into the big picture.

For example, I was asked if there is any possibility that since the Grays are so skilled at using electronic mind control equipment on us, that they could be controlling the few humans who go out at night and make the crop circles, even directing them as to what patterns to make.

This would require close monitoring and control so I would recommend checking the confessed crop circle “hoaxers” to see if they have implants. Personally I think that if the Grays were directing this crop circle program, the whole thing is a red herring to keep us distracted while they finish their implantation program. They want to fool us into thinking they have lofty aims. They have fed disinformation to people like Whitley Strieber who repeats what the aliens told him to say to the public so we will not prepare a defense or keep our guard up, etc., until we are blind-sided by the coming harvest.

There is also the possibility the Grays are swinging a double edge disinformation sword here. By having the hoaxers confess, it throws Ufology in the discredited pile because so many researchers were so sure the crop circles were alien in origin.

CIVIL DEFENSE

It’s after dark. Does anyone know where the aliens are?

ALIEN WATCH
There is a national UFO reporting center for sightings, but no organized nationwide program to observe alien abduction activity and report it immediately to local authorities. If local police and sheriffs departments receive enough reports of abductions in progress, it will soon become apparent they’ll need to obtain the equipment required to capture and arrest the aliens.

 

They can try to obtain mobile radar units surplus from the military. They are necessary to disable the alien craft. Private citizens will have to be the eyes and ears of this kind of program. I’d recommend they carry night-vision binoculars and a cell phone. Groups like MUFON could organize members to watch different areas.

 

Remember, call it in. Don’t try to apprehend them yourself. The cops can be waiting when the aliens return their abduction victims. Some police departments may have the manpower to run an alien watch themselves. This is an area that needs prompt action.

DO IT YOURSELF DEFENSE

The average citizen can’t purchase high tech weapons to counter the aliens. We’ll have to rely on booby traps and low-tech weapons as a last line of defense. The aliens abduct people out of their bedrooms at night. Sleeping people offer no resistance. If the aliens try a large nighttime roundup, we may be able to capture them by using improvised weapons. We can try pepper spray, tasers, and stun guns. Maybe bug spray works on the Grays.

We are an inventive people. I’m confident we can improvise some surprises, and share them over the Internet. Start improvising now. Infrared and motion detectors can be adapted to home alarm systems. Motion detectors pointed at the sky could function like radar to detect the UFO itself when it gets close. Our military should release some of the advanced alien electronic antipersonnel weapon technology they’ve acquired to American industry.

Our police, military, and citizens could look forward to countering the aliens with telepathic frequency jammers and alien nervous system neutralizers. Then we could paralyze them, if the military will give out the information and plans.

If the aliens send in ground troops for a big roundup, citizens will need to take up arms for local defense. Guerrilla tactics, like sniping from cover, would be the most effective temporary measure. If you have to shoot, take head shots. The Grays and Reptoids are telepathic and are in constant mental communication with each other. You must break that telepathic communications-link, or the other aliens will know instantly you are the shooter, and be given your location because they are still in contact with the wounded Gray or Reptoid.

Improvised anti-spacecraft weapons will be needed too. Powerful home-built radar systems will work. Most firearms would be ineffective since the craft can “dodge the bullet.” There is a web site with instructions for building a variety of improvised antipersonnel weapons at: http://www.totse.com/

Please don’t even think about building any of these weapons unless there is an extreme emergency. It is a felony to possess most of them in whole or in part. If you are in jail you can’t help defend Earth. You will be busy defending Uranus. (Sorry).

I am sure there are people out there who have been working on this problem for the government. It they would be willing to share this knowledge of effective anti-alien measures, they could send it to the Coast To Coast AM Radio Show web site, create special web sites, give to the media, etc.

Any business that can contribute engineering skills and production capacity for making anti-alien weapons and equipment should get involved in this project. If we do nothing the resulting loss of up to half the world’s population will be very bad for business. Half of all customers would be gone. Half of all employees would be gone. This is downsizing of the worst kind. It would create a long lasting global depression. You don’t want to live through a depression. They are very depressing. No jobs, no food, no fun. It’s a daily struggle to stay alive.

If you don’t prepare because you want hard evidence first, here’s my Warning, when the hard evidence arrives here, it will be a hard lesson. Do you want to gamble with the lives of your family, relatives and friends? Do you want to be eaten? DO SOMETHING! Indecision is fatal.

Questions about my plan to bring down and capture an alien craft.

How can you be sure your plan to bring down an alien craft by disabling its electronics with radar or microwaves will work?

The Leah Haley case earlier in this book is an example of an instance where the US military brought down an alien craft using microwave frequencies. The following articles show our military is well aware of the potential weapons applications for RF weapons against aircraft or spacecraft that use electronic control systems. Electronic countermeasures can be used against human and alien nervous systems, as the second article shows.

A New Threat to Aircraft Survivability: Radio Frequency Directed Energy Weapons

(RF DEW) John T. Tatum,

US. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD

Military aircraft face threats ranging from small arms fire to sophisticated guided missiles. Unfortunately, the range of threats to aircraft has now broadened to include directed energy weapons (DEW). DEWs fall within the electronic warfare category as defined by the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Memorandum of Policy No. 6. The three basic types of DEWs are laser, radio frequency (RF), and particle beam weapons. This article focuses on RF DEWs, also known as high power microwave (HPM) weapons, and a RF DEW engagement model known as the Directed RF Energy Assessment Model (DREAM).

 

DREAM is being developed by a tri-service team consisting of the Army Research Laboratory, the Air Force’s Phillips Laboratory, the Naval Air Warfare Center, and the team’s contractors SPARTA Inc. and Ball Aerospace Corporation, under the sponsorship of the JTCG/AS and the services. A RF DEW uses a beam of high-power RF pulses, similar to radar, to irradiate a target and couple sufficient energy into the target’s electronics to cause temporary interference/upset or permanent damage. RF DEWs are generally nonlethal to humans (compared with projectiles), affecting only the target’s electronics.

 

RF DEWs, however, could present a greater threat than conventional weapons due to the following characteristics:

• A higher probability of hit compared with projectiles (because the spreading RF beam can irradiate the entire target, it requires far less pointing and tracking accuracy).
• An instantaneous time of flight (speed of light) for fast engagements in nearly all weather conditions.
• A large magazine compared with the typical store of conventional projectiles and missiles.

The primary limitation of a RF DEW is the uncertainty in the probability of kill given a hit, because the kill depends greatly on the weapon parameters and its target. Therefore, although a RF DEW could pose a threat to aircraft, the critical questions are what RF power density is required to affect the target (i.e., the aircraft vulnerability level) and how close the weapon must be to be effective.

To help answer these questions, DREAM was developed to simulate a RF DEW engagement with an aircraft/missile and to compute the probability of failure of the target as a function of the incident RF power density and weapon range. DREAM runs on an MS-DOS compatible personal computer under the Microsoft Windows environment.

 

The model provides a graphical user interface to facilitate the input of parameters describing the RF DEW, the environment/propagation conditions, the target flight path, and a target description in a fault tree form. DREAM is based on the DOD HPM assessment methodology developed by the RF Effects Technical Working Group of the Joint Directors of Laboratories Technology Panel on DEW.

 

The probability of failure curves produced by DREAM can be used in the development of RF protection or “hardening” requirements for aircraft or as inputs for higher level force-on-force battlefield simulations evaluating the impact of RF DEWs on aircraft sortie generation. Though still under development, an initial version (Version 0) of DREAM is now available for limited distribution. The use of radio frequency weapons to disrupt the electronics of aircraft was demonstrated accidentally against some of our own planes. On July 29, 1967 the USS Forrestal (CVA 59) was cruising in the Gulf of Tonkin off the coast of North Vietnam when it experienced the worst carrier fire since World War II.

 

The Forrestal had several A-4 Skyhawk jets on deck, fully fueled and armed with a variety of air-to-air and air-to-ground ordinance. A Zuni rocket was accidentally launched. The missile hit a parked A-4, igniting its drop tank. The resulting fire burned for 13 hours, claimed 134 servicemen, caused $72 million in damage and required 7 months to repair the ship. Subsequent investigation showed that the missile launch was caused by perturbation of electronic systems being subjected to a powerful electromagnetic field.

 

One of the missile’s cables apparently had an improperly mounted shielded connector. When a shipboard radar illuminated it, RF voltages were developed in the degraded connector, resulting in a Zuni rocket being fired across the deck. Of course, increasing the range between the source of the energy and the potential victim can easily reduce the risk of similar electronic upsets. This is a primary reason for locating airport radar antennas in relatively remote areas of airfields. By calculating the maximum effective radiated power of an emitter, an appropriate minimum safe range can be defined.

 

The critical piece of information in this derivation is maximum power from the antenna. As high power microwave (HPM) technology advances, this RF susceptibility can be exploited by subjecting victim electronic systems to dangerous electromagnetic fields in areas assumed to be safe from such signals.

 

An HPM weapon uses a beam of high power radio frequency (RF) pulses, similar to a radar, to irradiate a target, with the goal of coupling sufficient energy into the victim’s electronics, causing temporary upset or permanent damage. HPM weapons have a far different array of limitations and attributes than a more typical arsenal. These include a much higher probability of a hit compared with projectiles, since the RF beam can illuminate the whole target and hence requires much less pointing and tracking accuracy.

 

Since the HPM weapon’s “ammunition” is electromagnetic energy, it does not require reloading, has a much larger “magazine” than a conventional weapon, and does not require acquisition of additional ammunition between uses. The effectiveness and speed of light velocity of the “ammunition” is unaffected by adverse weather conditions. The primary limitation of an HPM weapon is the uncertainty in the probability of kill of a given hit.

 

The critical parameters in this probability are the range from the weapon to target, amplitude of the emission, and vulnerability of the target at the frequency and power level of the emission. As the Forrestal fire shows, the target vulnerability can be inadvertently increased when seemingly minor components are degraded in manufacturing or due to use.

 

The Forrestal fire also shows that the increased susceptibility may not be known until after an investigation of a tragedy. Since customer comfort is important, airliner captains use more gradual flight slopes. The ground is assumed to be free of threats to the plane’s safe flight, although it is not controlled. Therefore, while it would be very difficult to effectively position an HPM weapon against a fighter, such a deployment against an airliner would be uncontested.

 

Given the uncontested nature of deployment of an HPM weapon against airliners, the risk must then be analyzed in terms of probability of kill. This is highly statistical, and dependent on many factors whose quantity is unknown. For guidance, airliner susceptibility to legitimate sources of electromagnetic radiation can be studied.

 

As the Forrestal incident shows, a highly complex sequence of coincidences can combine to unintentionally expose systems to HPM. Some may even argue that the probability of such a combination of normally incidental mistakes, failures and/or unconsidered circumstances is greater than intentional attack.

 

The Forrestal fire started from close range exposure of a system to a single radar. In other environments, however, a system could be inadvertently exposed to numerous systems in a short period of time. Technicians and engineers maintaining military surveillance and fire control radar typically use targets of opportunity to evaluate the performance of their systems. This includes analysis of fixed target returns, such as mountains and other known ground clutter, and tracking air traffic in the area. In these tests, it is common for fire control radar to “lock onto” airborne targets of opportunity to prove the system’s ability to track targets and measure their position.

 

This practice is generally safe, since there is never an intent of launching weapons. Just as in the Forrestal tragedy, however, a combination of events could become catastrophic. Since fire control radar are typically continuous wave and trained on a target, instead of sweeping an area with a pulsed waveform, the amount of average power illuminating a target is much greater than in acquisition radar. Under the proper conditions, the result can be similar to the demonstration of placing a twist tie in a microwave oven. Such conditions include those experienced by TWA 800.

 

They include an aircraft at low altitude and multiple fire control radars in the immediate vicinity. Since the 747 was taking off near an area of military exercises, it is feasible that it could have been a “target of opportunity” for one or more tracking radars. The low altitude and close down range proximity thousands of miles of fiber optic cable installed for their “communication” needs. Maybe we are expecting visitors. In light of this “two-way street” concept, could there be anything else going on that are signs of behind the scenes alien influence to keep us more manageable and less dangerous? The answer is yes, many things.

 

There are many comings and goings on this would have combined to allow a much stronger field strength than normal. Another example of a RF risk scenario is an airliner entering airspace that is near an area of military exercises. Generally, operations that are sufficiently complex to include the use of tracking radar and other sources of extraordinarily intense RF signals occur isolated from populated areas. This often restricts such maneuvers to desert or ocean environments. If an airliner flies too close to powerful RF emitters, it can be subjected to dangerously intense electromagnetic fields.

 

Since the existence of military exercises is unchangeable, the risk they pose to airliners requires a statistical analysis defining a “safe” exposure level. The FAA cites 200 volts per meter as High Intensity Radio Frequency (HIRF). Levels below that are assumed to be safe. Much more powerful fields may be encountered, however, near remote military activity with multiple emitters or if locked onto with a single fire control radar.

John Tatum is an electronic systems engineer with the Army Research Laboratory (ARL) in Adelphi, Maryland. He is presently a project leader in the RF Effects and Hardening Technology Branch. Mr. Tatum is the current chairman of the RF Effects Technical Working Group of the Joint Directors of Laboratories Technology Panel on DEW, as well as a co-chairman of the Advanced Threats Committee of the JTCG/AS Methodology Subgroup.

 

He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Maryland and has completed graduate studies in the areas of radar and communications. There was an article in the US Army War College Quarterly - Spring 1998, that shows our will and consciousness can be overcome electronically too, and future war plans should incorporate such tactics. The article is “The Mind Has No Firewall Against Psi Warfare And Thought Control” by Col. Timothy L. Thomas.

 

He informs us RF weapons and other electronic or sonic systems can be effective in disabling or completely neutralizing the nervous systems of living creatures. There should now be no doubt the aliens used advanced electronic techniques on us to accomplish such tasks as rendering people unconscious, paralyzing them, controlling their physical actions, implanting screen memories, reading thoughts, etc.

 

The military has a record of adopting technology to make war more efficient so we can win. So when the military wants to adopt methods of making war that are less deadly for the combatants on both sides, the military is paralleling (and very probably copying) the aliens. The Army wants to electronically render the enemy unconscious to accomplish their objectives. Once the enemy troops are unconscious, they can be taken into custody and become prisoners of war, much like the alien abduction program acquires human abductees.

 

Unconscious people can’t fight back. The bottom line is: if the aliens can do it, we can do it. When abductees have reported being controlled or paralyzed by the aliens, they were telling the truth.

 

If you would like to read Col. Thomas’s article in its entirety yourself, it is currently available on-line at: http://carlislewww.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/98spring/thomas.htm

After reading the article you will understand that with the slight edge in electronics that the aliens have, they can abduct us with no fuss. On the other hand, this may be why the aliens won’t expose their craft by taking off in the face of strong radar systems (like in the account given by Col. Corso).

Those radar pulses may interfere directly with the large sensitive brains of the Grays. The Grays are telepathic. Being telepathic may make them very sensitive to incoming electromagnetic signals. The pulses could interfere with or even wipe out their avionic controlling implants. But the bottom line is, if the signal is strong enough, it will have an adverse effect on
either biologic or electronic processes. If RF can interfere with human brains and electronic equipment, it can also interfere with the alien brains and electronic gear.

The HAARP site in Alaska has an offsite control bunker to protect HAARP personnel from side emissions given off by the antenna array, and it keeps the personnel out of the target area to avoid incoming electromagnetic blasts from an adversary aiming at the HAARP site. HAARP is remotely controlled from that bunker by large fiber-optic cables, which themselves are not effected by EMP. As a result, the sensitive minds of the people operating HAARP and HAARP’s sensitive control equipment are both protected from radio interference.

EMP warfare is a two-way street. HAARP was designed with fiber optic control lines to resist damage from electromagnetic pulses, either from HAARP itself or from an adversary. Because fiber optic technology depends on the modulation of light over thin strands of glass, it enjoys a number of benefits over tradition metal communications lines, including the following: fiber optic cables have a much greater bandwidth than metal cables, which means that fiber optic cables can carry more data; fiber optic cable is less susceptible than metal cables to electromagnetic and other interference; fiber optic cables are much thinner and lighter than metal wires; fiber optic cables allow data to be transmitted digitally (the natural form for computer data) rather than analogically; and fiber optic cables use less power and have lower overall operating costs.

Fiber optic cable is capable of carrying approximately 130,000 simultaneous voice conversations. Area 51 has only recently had street in the weapons and cattle control arena. Many types of weapons are dangerous to the aliens themselves and their craft. We keep running into the same suspicious patterns, where “incidents” occur and a public outcry suddenly springs up to do away with those weapons involved. Using firearms as an example, first “something” causes kids to shoot other kids in schools, and adults to shoot other adults on the job.

There is a big outcry in the “controlled” media to ban all guns. So far that tactic has resulted in Britain and Australia banning private ownership of all guns, with Canada trying to do likewise. Gun-free zones are safer for aliens. There is a push in the US to sell electronically controlled “safe” firearms. Electronic firearms can be disabled at a safe distance. There are other examples. Star Wars type weapons are once again under development. Russian leaders are protesting for some reason.

(There was even the case reported by Col. Corso where an alien asked him to shut down the air base radar so the alien’s craft could take off).

We know how easily Russian leaders can be mind controlled. Stalin killed ten million of his own people in peacetime.

Guess whom that body count benefited? The Aliens. CSETI’s Dr. Steven Greer is lobbying congress to pass a law making it illegal to take weapons into space. He claims to have made direct contact with the aliens and they are all love and light. The aliens want to eliminate nuclear ICBMs.

A large UFO hovered over an underground Russian missile base a few years back and initiated the launch sequence for an ICBM in a silo. The aliens first randomized the ICBM computer’s target coordinates so it would go anywhere. The Russians scrambled frantically to stop the launch, shutting the missile down just in time. If the missile had launched and blew up some random target, there would have been a worldwide public outcry to ban nuclear weapons. Nobody would have ever believed the Russians if they reported that a UFO caused the accidental launch.

Then we have cruise missiles. One mistakenly hit the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia. Additionally, President Clinton expended nearly all of our cruise missiles for no good reason. Several political writers have said he did it to distract attention from his scandals. Bottom line is they are almost gone and none have been reordered to replace them. IRBMs of both the US and Russia have been taken out of service and destroyed.

Many US military bases at home and abroad have been shut down and Navy and Air Force squadrons have been shut down (see “US Not Ready For War” elsewhere in this book). The Russians have laid off hundreds of thousands of military personnel and their navy and air force is deteriorating. Many Russian military personnel have drifted off because they haven’t been paid for over a year. The US has downsized our troop strength too.

Less military equipment and manpower means it is safer for the aliens. Defense is a numbers thing. You need a big enough force to defend yourself adequately. Going way back to World War one, gas warfare was used. That too will kill aliens.

There was a big outcry about it, and it was banned by the Geneva Convention. Recently napalm and land mines were banned too. All of our stocks of napalm have now been destroyed. Incinerated meat, or meat full of shrapnel is of no use to the Reptoids. We have fewer military options and fewer hardware and human resources every day. War is supposed to be horrible for our enemies. I believe there are other moves afoot to weaken our military infrastructure.

All ground based military electrical and electronic equipment needs power plants to supply the electricity to run radar, HAARP type weapons, Star Wars type weapons, and all communications systems. There has been a push to close nuclear plants and build no more of them. There were meltdowns at two nuclear plants, Chernobyl and Three Mile Island. Russians living near Chernobyl died. Then there was the standard public outcry. In an attack it is much easier to blow up natural gas pipelines and oil storage tanks to disable conventional power plants than it is to disable a nuclear reactor that is in a heavily shielded structure and has a self contained fuel source.

When the KGB was disbanded after the fall of the Soviet Union, researchers going through the KGB archives, found that the KGB had heavily financed a long term program to have American ecology groups seek the banning of nuclear power plants (those influential Russians again). The Russians sponsored and organized many protests by antinuclear power plant groups. Now conventional power plants on the West Coast can barely keep up with California’s power needs.

There is also a move afoot by the tree hugger organizations to ban HAARP, and ban drilling for additional oil and natural gas. To also destroy US manpower and infrastructure, the Russians had a program running in the 1960s that brought into the US all types of illegal drugs and distributed them free in several major US cities. I went to school with two people who later joined the US Communist party and were part of the distribution program.

Years later they told me about it. It’s a long story. But again, this was an attempt to mellow out our manpower and make us weaker, with no will to fight. Drugs turn us into stupid dazed sheep, it is done to us now and was done in ancient Egypt and Central America. Drugs are the actual opiate of the masses, served up by those that are tools of the aliens. We even have to be aware of aliens bearing gifts.

Any advanced technology they may have given us or that we acquired, they will know how to neutralize it. We need to be ready in the tactics, communications, and logistics department so that we are not surprised. The aliens could take major corrective action to return us to being happy dopey sheep.

Back to Top