|
by
Michael E. Salla, PhD
January 1, 2004
Introduction
*
There has been an undisclosed extraterrestrial presence on Earth since at
least the Second World War era that has been known to senior officials in
national security organizations of major states who have attempted to
develop a successful strategic response. There is persuasive whistleblower
testimony that different extraterrestrial groups appeared before senior
national security officials of the US to offer a variety of technologies,
programs and forms of assistance. These national security officials decided
to enter into secret agreements with extraterrestrials that offered
technologies with military applications. In making these agreements, US
policy makers deliberately adopted a strategic policy similar to 19th
century Prussia/Germany.
Under the leadership of its powerful Chancellor,
Otto Von Bismarck, Prussia transformed itself from a mid-size Germanic
principality vulnerable to its more powerful European neighbors, to a
unified German Empire that quickly became a leading European power. Likewise,
senior officials in the US planned to emulate the role of Prussia/Germany in
developing a strategy for coordinating Earth’s system of sovereign states
under the leadership of the US in order to adequately respond to the
extraterrestrial presence.
In refusing the assistance of extraterrestrial races that offered
technologies that focused on developing grass roots ‘human capacities’ and
‘planetary cleansing’, policy makers dealing with extraterrestrials were
indicating that they viewed this as a strategically dangerous choice given
the uncertainty surrounding the extraterrestrial presence. There has
subsequently been a secret effort to develop through a vast network of
compartmentalized ‘black projects’ an advanced planetary defense system
capable of ensuring the sovereignty of major countries such as the US,
Russia, Britain, France and China, and more generally the global sovereignty
of humanity. The network of projects has been financially supported by a
‘black budget’ that in the US alone is annually estimated to be over one
trillion dollars and constitutes a second ‘Manhattan Project’.
[1]
This paper analyses the strategic implications of the power politics modeled
on Bismarck’s Prussia/Germany, the secret defense system put in place to
respond to the extraterrestrial presence, and the complete exclusion of the
general public from extraterrestrial affairs and from playing any
significant role in planetary defense. Rather than viewing the general
public as a strategic asset in developing a successful response to the
extraterrestrial presence, policy makers have viewed the general public as a
strategic liability that needed to remain uninformed of the extraterrestrial
presence. The role of the general public became a passive one of merely
remaining a provider of basic resources for the extensive network of
compartmentalized black projects designed to provide a successful response
to the extraterrestrial presence.
This paper will argue that there is an inherent flaw in a power politics
strategy that relegates the general public into a passive role in any global
defense system. Instead, it will be argued that there is a need for full
disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence so that global humanity can play
an active role in global defense by developing human capacities in a range
of critical areas:
These areas of assistance offered by
extraterrestrial races have hitherto attracted only marginal interest by
national security officials in black projects. In cooperating with those
extraterrestrial races interested in assisting global humanity in these
‘consciousness raising’ and ‘friendly technology’ capacity areas, grass
roots organizations and individuals will have a significant strategic impact
on how the extraterrestrial presence is managed and global defense
established. This will ultimately enable human society to be better prepared
to respond to any contingencies created by those extraterrestrials currently
acting to subvert human sovereignty and freedom.
It will be further argued that the strategic doctrine underpinning the
global defense of the planet is unbalanced and skewed towards a military and
technological response to a phenomenon that requires balancing
military/technological projects with grass roots human capacity building.
Finding this balance will enable policy makers and the general public to
deal with a range of global problems that provide a cover for subversion of
human affairs by those extraterrestrial races seeking to control the Earth’s
population and resources. To ignore the failure of power politics as an
appropriate strategic response to the extraterrestrial presence is to invite
the same sequence of policy mistakes that led to the First World War, but
this time at an interplanetary level that would be a direct threat to human
sovereignty and freedom.
|
Go Back |
 |
The Strategic Dilemma – Finding Strategic Allies Among Extraterrestrial
Races
Official confirmation of an extraterrestrial presence occurred during the
Second World War era when policy makers from the US and major allied states
were presented with a powerful dilemma in how to best respond.
[2] They had
conclusively learned of the existence of extraterrestrials with advanced
technologies that outdated the most advanced weapons systems of the
successful allied states by centuries if not millennia. What was more
disturbing, the extraterrestrials possessed advanced mental and psychic
powers that had the potential of subtly influencing even the most
sophisticated policy makers during communications, let alone the unprepared
general public. An example of the mental abilities of these races is
described by one whistleblower, who claimed that extraterrestrial races such
as the ‘Grays’ use ‘suggestive telepathy’ that subtly allows them to
manipulate humans in any communications:
The Grays, and most extraterrestrials for that matter, communicate with
humans exclusively through a form of telepathy, which we called suggestive
telepathy because to us it seemed that the Grays communicated in a such a
way that they were trying to lead a conversation to a particular end. In
other words, they always had an agenda, and we were never certain if we were
a pawn of their agenda or we arrived at conclusions that were indeed our
own.
[3]
The appearance of these technologically and mentally advanced
extraterrestrials was complicated by the fact that there appeared to be a
number of races that were competing against one another in monitoring and/or
interacting with the Earth. The intentions, activities and agendas of these
extraterrestrial races could not be conclusively determined. Some appeared
to be friendly, some unfriendly and many neutral.
[4] This presented an
enormous policy dilemma for national security officials that were assessing
the global policy environment at the end of the Second World War. Which of
the races could policy makers cooperate with in learning more about
extraterrestrials in general and developing an appropriate strategic
response? Policy makers needed to first identify and categorize the
different extraterrestrial races in terms of those with whom cooperative
agreements could be made; races which could be safely ignored in terms of
their strategic impact; and races which needed to be monitored and even
resisted as strategic competitors for control of the Earth’s population and
resources.
There was a major difference in policy between extraterrestrial races over
the exchange of extraterrestrial technology that had a weapons application.
Some extraterrestrials were willing to trade technology that had military
applications in exchange for permission to conduct a biological program
aimed at genetically enhancing their race. The race commonly known as
‘Grays’ claimed to come from Zeta Reticulum and said they had overused
reproductive cloning procedures to the extent that their genetic makeup had
suffered.
[5] In contrast, a race of humanoid extraterrestrials appeared who
were willing to assist in the ‘consciousness raising’ of the planet’s
population and developing environmentally friendly technologies. These
humanoid races offered no technology of military significance and instead
requested the dismantling of nuclear weapons that they considered extremely
dangerous.
[6]
The strategic dilemma here for policy makers in making a choice, was
compounded by what appeared to be a complex web of relationships, some
friendly, some neutral, and others hostile, between the different
extraterrestrial races. According to the ‘scientific remote viewer’, Dr
Courtney Brown, there are a number of distinct interplanetary
extraterrestrial races with a diversity of factions within them making it
difficult to conclusively characterize their long-term goals and agendas.
[7] The diversity of extraterrestrial factions and wars between them has
historical support in terms of Sumerian cuneiform texts recording activities
of the ancient
Anunnaki (an extraterrestrial race from the mysterious planet
Nibiru)
that played a role in human colonization of the Earth.
[8]
The
diversity of extraterrestrial relationships and factions made it difficult
to assess what the strategic implications of working with any one race would
be since these extraterrestrial relationships appeared to be fluid. There
was evidence, for example, that a hidden and indigenous Earth race of
‘Reptilians’ was cooperating with a more dominant
winged Reptilian race from
Alpha Draconis, who had a history of both conflict and cooperation with the
Grays. [9]
The Grays’ relationship with these
Reptilian races needed to be
taken into account in any agreement since technology exchanges would impact
on the relationship between humans and the hidden indigenous Reptilian
presence on Earth.
It can be inferred that prior to reaching agreement with national
governments based on technology exchange for genetic experiments, that the
Grays had reached agreements with
Reptilians who have had a long-term
presence on Earth that arguably predates the human presence.
[10] This meant
that any agreement with the Grays would have implicitly involved permission
or cooperation with the Reptilian race that have historically exercised a
powerful influence, if not secret control, over key national institutions.
[11]
In what was a momentous, though secret, policy decision for the entire
planet, the national security organizations of the US and other major
governments decided to form a strategic alliance with the Grays and the
Reptilian races with which the Grays were associated. The goal of this
alliance was to enable clandestine national security organizations to
effectively build an extensive network of ‘black projects’ aimed at
providing an adequate defense infrastructure for the planet using
extraterrestrial technologies and information. These secret agreements have
led to the construction of an extensive number of underground bases around
the planet linked by highly advanced transportation systems and complete
support services.
[12]
Some of these are joint human-extraterrestrial
underground bases in locations such as
Dulce, New Mexico, and
Pine Gap
Australia.
[13]
In the Dulce joint base it has been claimed by whistleblowers that both
Grays and Reptilians worked alongside human workers under contract by
various corporations, supervised by US special military forces, and that
ordinary civilians were subjected to extensive human rights violations.
[14]
The alliance meant that other races that were more inclined towards
assisting humanity in dealing with social and environmental problems were
sidelined due to their lack of strategic significance for policy makers
dealing with extraterrestrial affairs. The model that national security
organizations in the US used to develop a ‘successful strategy’ was based on
Realpolitik or ‘power politics’. ‘Power politics’
was successfully used by
19th century Prussia in developing its military and industrial capacity
while uniting the Germanic principalities, without its European neighbors
allying themselves to prevent Prussia’s rapid expansion in influence and
power.
|
Go Back |
|
'Power Politics’, the United States & The Extraterrestrial Presence
‘Power politics’ refers to the Realpolitik practiced by a variety of
national leaders since Cardinal Richelieu, Chief Minister of France
(1624-42), but most successfully by Otto Von Bismark, Prussia’s last Prime
Minister and Germany’s First Chancellor (1862-90).
[15]
Bismarck’s power
politics was based on two assumptions about the nature of international
politics. First, states should use all means at their disposal to advance
their national ‘interests’. And second, a ‘balance of power’ was the key to
preserving peace and stability, and states needed to respect this while
competing over their respective national interests.
[16] Ethical and/or
universal principles were at best irrelevant to the practice of power
politics; or, at worst, recipes for national disaster.
[17] In this way
‘power politics’ was an extension of the political philosophy of the
medieval Italian theorist, Nicolo Machiavelli designed to extend a
Sovereign’s rule where morality had no inherent value other than its
usefulness for attaining one’s ultimate goal: political power.
[18]
Power politics meant navigating through the competing interests of other
states in a way that gradually increased one’s national interests at the
expense of one’s competitors without provoking these competitors to ally
themselves to prevent a change of the status quo. In the case of Prussia,
this meant expanding Prussia’s influence in Europe at the expense of Austria
and France without provoking a reaction by Britain and Russia that would
lead to alliances that would threaten Prussia’s national interests. In a
relatively short time after coming to office, Bismarck’s Prussia
successively defeated Austria (1866) and France (1870-71) in two short wars.
Prussia succeeded in uniting the northern German principalities in 1866 in a
Confederation dominated by Prussia (1866), and then absorbing all the
principalities in the German Empire in 1871 under Prussia’s King Wilhelm I
and with Bismarck as Chancellor. Bismarck’s ability to maneuver between
Prussia’s national competitors in a way that gradually increased
Prussia’s/Germany’s interests without provoking a major backlash among
competitors became a model for how a state could strategically use its
assets to become the dominant actor in a regional system.
Bismarck’s power politics has been used as an exemplary model in developing
the strategy for how national security agencies in the US and other major
states would respond to the extraterrestrial presence. One of the
individuals most responsible for developing the power politics strategy was
Dr Henry Kissinger who was a well-known advocate of realpolitik in his
controversial public career.
[19] Less well known is that
Kissinger rose to
prominent leadership positions in the secret committees developed to manage
extraterrestrial affairs such as Majestic 12/PI 40/Committee of the Majority
in the US, and the
Bilderberg Group and
Trilateral Commission
internationally. [20]
Essentially, the strategic response that the US took
vis-ŕ-vis the extraterrestrial presence was a version of power politics, and
it was Kissinger who was largely responsible for this. This meant that US
policy makers viewed other states and the different extraterrestrial
factions as respectively strategic allies and/or competitors for Earth’s
resources and population. The goal of power politics adopted by the US under
Kissinger’s tutelage was for the US to build upon its post-Second World War
status as the most powerful nation on the planet, and lead the way in a
secret coordinated global response to the extraterrestrial presence.
[21]
Practitioners of power politics sought to identify those extraterrestrials
they could best work with in order to promote their respective national
interests, while ensuring they could maintain a balance of power that would
prevent a ‘war of the worlds’ or war between major states over
extraterrestrial issues. Ethical or universal principles such as ‘galactic
brotherhood’, ‘universal peace’ and ‘cosmic law’ were either irrelevant, or
viewed as recipes for disaster in terms of national interests and global
defense. Those extraterrestrial groups that practiced these
ethical/universal principles were subsequently ignored since they would not
advance the national interests of the major states in the opinion of policy
makers. Extraterrestrial races that were willing to enter into agreements
that furthered the national interests of major states, joint basing rights,
trading extraterrestrial technology, experiments on human genetic material,
and behavior modification techniques, thus became secret allies of the US
and other major states.
Policy makers applying power politics in dealing with extraterrestrials
viewed their ‘national interests’ in a narrow restrictive way in terms of
the military, industrial and scientific capacities required for building an
effective military deterrent to any possible undesirable extraterrestrial
intervention in human affairs. It was seen that this would be the best means
of protecting national interests of the US and other major states. Solid
evidence for this power politics strategy comes in the whistleblower
testimonies those who participated in clandestine reverse engineering
programs for weapons development not disclosed to the general public and
elected public officials.
[22]
In the case of the emergence of the US as the dominant global nation,
agreements would be made with those extraterrestrial races that would assist
US strategic objectives, and military conflicts would occur with those races
from which strategically significant assets could be won. According to a
number of whistleblowers,
the Eisenhower administration made agreements with
extraterrestrial races.
Col Phillip Corso,
a highly decorated officer that
served in Eisenhower’s National Security Council wrote:
“We had negotiated a
kind of surrender with them [ETs] as long as we couldn’t fight them. They
dictated the terms because they knew what we most feared was disclosure.”
[23]
According to Dr Michael Wolf, a former National Security Council
consultant and whistleblower, the Eisenhower administration entered into the
treaty with the so-called Grey extraterrestrials from the fourth planet of
the star system Zeta Reticulum, but this treaty was never ratified as
Constitutionally required.
[24]
The secret Treaty between the
Eisenhower
administration and an extraterrestrial race has been disclosed by a number
of other ‘whistleblowers’ claiming former access to secret documents
disclosing the existence of such a treaty.
[25]
Both sides apparently violated these agreements/treaties. Extraterrestrial
races secretly abducted and experiment with more human subjects than they
were reporting to military-intelligence authorities.
[26] According to
John
Lear, a former CIA asset and son of the famous designer of the Lear Jet,
… a deal was struck that in exchange for advanced technology from the aliens
we would allow them to abduct a very small number of persons and we would
periodically be given a list of those persons abducted. We got something
less than the technology we bargained for and found the abductions exceeded
by a million fold than what we had naively agreed to.
[27]
The US military subsequently began targeting extraterrestrials ships with
advanced weapons technology and capturing their ships and occupants.
[28]
There is evidence that the High frequency Active Auroral Research Program
(HAARP)
is
in fact a particle beam projector capable of generating a global shield
where high-speed ions are projected into the magnetosphere and thereby
destroy the electronic systems of any craft attempting to enter the Earth’s
atmosphere. [29] This secret limited warfare with unannounced
extraterrestrial races became a means of gaining extraterrestrial technology
that was not being achieved through negotiated agreements. So like
Bismarck’s Prussia/Germany, power politics practiced by the US and its major
allies would simultaneously seek a balance of power that would ensure no
major interplanetary war, but also limited military conflicts with those
extraterrestrial races that strengthened the US strategic position.
At the global level, there continues to be efforts to coordinate the use of
military force through multilateral institutions as occurred with the UN
sanctioned intervention in Iraq/Kuwait in 1991; or NATO’s military
intervention in Kosovo in 1999; or a multilateral action led the US with the
support of a ‘coalition of the willing' (Iraq 2003). The power politics
strategy was that global humanity through the US and other major nations
would be able to deal with the extraterrestrial presence through a position
of strength. The ultimate goal is the construction of a fortress for the
planet from extraterrestrial intervention and/or subversion.
There is clear evidence that the power politics conducted by the US and its
allies in response to extraterrestrials has as a major component the
construction of a global surveillance system and exotic weapons systems over
both the planet’s skies and oceans. The Low Frequency Active sonar waves
used by the US Navy to monitor sub-ocean activities ostensibly of
submarines, but more accurately of extraterrestrial vehicles, are having a
damaging effect on the planets cetaceans.
[30] Recently, lawsuits were filed
in the US to put a stop to the Navy’s testing but it remains questionable
whether the Navy would voluntarily stop such testing due to the perceived
need to monitor extraterrestrial activity in the world’s oceans. In addition
to a surveillance system in the world’s oceans, there would be a global
electromagnetic shield around the planet.
A prototype for this global shield
is the High frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) which can be
used as a particle generator to send ions into the magnetosphere that
quickly surround the earth, in an electromagnetic shield to prevent entry of
extraterrestrial craft.
[31]
Earth would to all intents and purposes become
a planetary fortress. The strategic consequences of ‘planetary fortress’
policy would be that the only extraterrestrial groups permitted to ‘show
themselves’ to the global population are those that serve the ‘national
interests’ of the US and major states as defined by a restricted group of
policy makers managing extraterrestrial affairs. This would limit the
quantity and quality of extraterrestrial interactions in a post-Contact
world to those permitted by policy makers who have developed secret
agreements with particular extraterrestrial races. It could therefore be
predicted that the actual conditions of a mass contact event would be
contrived or spun in a way that served the interests of elite policy makers
and the extraterrestrial groups they work with.
[32]
|
Go Back |
|
The Failure of Power Politics & Centralized Global Defense against
Extraterrestrial Intervention & Subversion
Power politics based on the Prussian/German historical experience appears
very understandable and even laudable as the basic strategy to preserve
humanity's sovereignty and independence in response to more technologically
developed extraterrestrial races. Historic models such as the conquest of
the Americas are testimony to the danger of making unwarranted assumptions
about the benevolent intentions of more technologically advanced visitors to
one’s national shores. The strategic policy of advancing national interests
by dealing with extraterrestrial races in terms of concrete assistance for a
rapid program of military modernization and political coordination among
major states may appear a sensible way of moving forward in dealing with the
diversity of unknown extraterrestrial actors and possible threats they pose
to human sovereignty.
There is evidence that much of the apparent hostility behind the Cold War
was contrived to mask the true strategic cooperation occurring between major
powers and the need to keep this secret from their respective general
publics.
[33] A key assumption in this cooperative strategy was that global
general public would not be able to deal with the social, political and
economic consequences of the extraterrestrial presence and that a premature
disclosure would risk the disintegration of societal infrastructure. This
led to the rapid modernization program based on extraterrestrial technology
and agreements becoming highly classified state secrets, thus preventing the
general publics from gaining any official information on the
extraterrestrial presence. Elected public officials were informed only to
the extent that they held key cabinet or legislative positions that were
critical in passing policies that affected the network of compartmentalized
black projects, and the black budget that funded them.
[34]
This paralleled the power politics practiced by Bismarck’s Prussia/Germany
where the German Empire was democratic in name only and where the parliament
could only pass non-binding decisions rather than control the policy making
process. The German parliament and population therefore could not act as a
restraint on the aspirations of the reckless new German Emperor, Wilhelm II,
once the cautious Bismarck was forced to retire in 1890. This ultimately
proved disastrous and was directly responsible for the buildup in European
tension that led to the First World War and exposed the inherent strategic
flaws in power politics. Excluding the German population from having real
influence in the policy making process was to remove the only viable
restraint to reckless national leadership in a centralized political system.
The conventional explanation is that the First World War was caused by the
reckless policies of Wilhelm II, and that the more cautious Bismarck would
never have allowed the war to occur. [35] This explanation disguises the
deeper cause which was the centralized policy making process that Bismarck
created that eliminated any checks and balances in the way power politics
was conducted at the national level. While such a system might work with
cautious policy makers such as Bismarck at the helm, it would be disastrous
with more irresponsible policy leaders. History has demonstrated that power
politics is inherently flawed as a strategic doctrine since it encourages a
centralized political system where there are few restraints on irresponsible
leaders and their policies.
It appears that similar situation now is occurring in the way leadership is
exercised over the management of the extraterrestrial presence in the US.
Kissinger’s more cautious power politics style based on his own strategic
understanding of the different extraterrestrial actors is being challenged
by a new generation of leaders. This new generation of policy makers
managing extraterrestrial affairs is bolder and less risk averse than
Kissinger’s generation who well remember the horrors of the second world war
and the need to prevent such an occurrence ever happening again.
Whistleblowers such as Michael Wolf discuss the leadership style of a group
he describes as ‘the cabal’ who have a xenophobic hatred of the
extraterrestrial visitors and are intent on military confrontation.
[36]
Just as Bismarck’s influence over German foreign policy was eclipsed by a
new generation of risk taking leaders under Wilhelm II, so too Kissinger’s
influence of extraterrestrial management is now being eclipsed. This will
lead to a more dangerous period where poor policy choices can lead to a
military adventurism by those in control of the extraterrestrial management
system, and pose an ultimate long-term threat to human sovereignty. In
short, the power politics strategy that has dominated the extraterrestrial
management system, has laid the foundation for a devastating breakdown in
the way the extraterrestrial presence has been managed.
The failure of power politics as a coherent strategy for responding to the
extraterrestrial presence stems from dismissal of the role of an informed
general public in managing the extraterrestrial presence. In particular,
there is a dismissal of the idea that human capacity building provides a
vital asset in dealing with extraterrestrials. This inherent flaw in a power
politics approach to extraterrestrials is based on the assumption that the
general public offers a ‘soft target’ which extraterrestrial races could
easily subvert, thereby threatening any modernization programs underway and
a coordinated response to the extraterrestrial presence.
It is believed that
the creation of a secret compartmentalized national security system would be
the best safeguard against extraterrestrial subversion while developing the
military, technological and scientific capacities to respond to the
extraterrestrial presence. In short, a secret compartmentalized national
security system forms a ‘hard target’ for subversion in contrast to the
general public as a ‘soft target’ for subversion. There is evidence that in
the US this secret compartmentalized national security system forms a second
‘Manhattan Project’ that dwarfs the first Manhattan project and the
construction of atomic weapons. [37]
Unfortunately, whistleblower testimonies have demonstrated the fallacy of
the assumption that a secret compartmentalized national security system
forms a hard target for extraterrestrial subversion. Extraterrestrial
infiltration and subversion has occurred in:
-
the military-intelligence
community
-
the corporations that secretly fulfill contracts dealing with the
extraterrestrial presence
-
of key educational and research institutions.
[38]
Phil Schneider, a former civil engineer employed in black projects
involving the construction of underground bases provided detailed testimony
of the extent of extraterrestrial subversion in a range of public lectures
before he was found dead in controversial circumstances. [39] Further
whistleblower testimonies have provided researchers with information of the
historic and contemporary role played by extraterrestrial races in
subverting human affairs.
[40] Aside from the whistleblower testimonies,
there are also ‘conspiracy theory’ researchers such as Jim Marrs, David
Icke, Lynne Picknett and Clive Prince, who describe how extraterrestrials
have been able to subvert the policy making community at the highest levels
not only in the contemporary era but also historically.
[41]
The extraterrestrial subversion in the contemporary era has been made
possible by the secrecy and compartmentalization that has been put in place
surrounding all aspects of the extraterrestrial presence. Furthermore, there
is evidence that advanced technology involving, mind control, implants,
drugs, and psychotronics have been used to control humans.
[42] Testimonies
from individuals who participated in classified compartmentalized government
projects such as Preston Nichols, Al Bielek, and Stewart Swerdlow point to
the pervasive use of these technologies and even the use of time travel and
cloning technologies used by extraterrestrial races.
[43]
Such technologies
provides the opportunity for extraterrestrial subversion of a centralized
decision making process since it only requires compromising a few key policy
makers to subvert a national security agency. Indeed, it may be argued that
the process of centralizing decision making concerning national security is
discretely encouraged by extraterrestrial races desiring to subvert the
decision making process. The extraterrestrial races that enter into secret
agreements may have as their ultimate goal the subversion of the entire
national security system of a nation such as the US, and may be feigning
cooperation when the real purpose is to subvert rather than gain human
assistance in areas of interest to extraterrestrials. Cooperating in the
network of secret compartmentalized black projects provides the opportunity
for this extraterrestrial subversion to occur quietly with tremendous
long-term costs for human sovereignty and freedom.
Dealing with the problem of extraterrestrial subversion of the decision
making process requires an extensive set of checks and balances that are
part of a robust democratic process based on transparency, openness and
accountability, as opposed to a secret compartmentalized national security
system. The transparency, openness and accountability necessary for
identifying and eliminating extraterrestrial subversion of human society
have not been possible due to the continued secrecy policy surrounding the
extraterrestrial presence. In short, the kind of democratic processes that
add a series of checks and balances to irresponsible government policies
have not been allowed to develop in terms of how national security
organizations respond to the extraterrestrial presence. This absence of
democratic processes has facilitated rather than curbed extraterrestrial
infiltration and subversion of the national security system created to
respond to extraterrestrials.
A further flaw in the power politics strategy is that extraterrestrial races
that had no interest in providing technologies that had weapons development
potential, were deemed strategically irrelevant and not permitted to openly
assist in human capacity building. This effectively eliminated as a
significant actor in human affairs extraterrestrial races whose principled
behavior suggested they were more intent on building human capacities than
providing technological assistance with military applications for national
security organizations. This has led to the unfortunate situation where the
only extraterrestrials officially allowed to interact with human societies
are those participating in the secret agreements that served the national
interests of major states from the perspective of building military,
industrial and scientific capacities.
The resulting interactions according
to extensive testimonies surrounding human abductions has been mixed. Some
researchers argue that these have a beneficial impact while others argue
that these consistently violate the rights of civilians forced to
participate in these extraterrestrial programs.
[44] Furthermore, there is
persuasive evidence that extensive extraterrestrial violations of human
rights have occurred at joint extraterrestrial-government bases indicating a
high degree of official/corporate complicity.
[45]
Interactions with extraterrestrial races intent on human capacity building
have been limited to isolated events and have not been permitted to become
sufficiently extensive to impact on the broader human society. The most well
known of these is the case of
Billy Meier
and the extensive photographic,
video and audio evidence he has provided of visiting extraterrestrials from
the Pleiades.
[46] Another example is
James Gilliland in Washington State,
US, who has also provided extensive photographic, film and sound evidence of
visiting extraterrestrials, as well as his communications with them.
[47]
Indeed the interactions with Meiers and Gilliland provide an example of the
type of consciousness raising and education that this group of
extraterrestrials would introduce in their capacity building of human
society.
See below report about
Billy Meier:
The power politics underlying the strategic response to the extraterrestrial
presence has led to a secret centralized compartmentalized global defense
policy that does not adequately use the best asset against extraterrestrial
subversion and intervention, an informed and empowered global humanity. Such
a self-empowered humanity would impact both on how the extraterrestrial
presence is managed, and in creation of a viable global defense to respond
to any extraterrestrial contingency. Global humanity offers the
possibilities of a balanced global defense that uses all the available
strategic assets if extraterrestrial subversion and undesirable intervention
is to be prevented. Power politics consequently fails to be a suitable
strategic response to the extraterrestrial presence, and an alternative is
urgently required.
|
Go Back |
|
Developing an Alternative Strategy for Responding to the Extraterrestrial
Presence
At the moment, the US and other major global states have secret agreements
with different extraterrestrial races that lead to the exchange of
technologies with military-intelligence applications. All commercial
applications are released at a rate that has only marginal impact on the
global population ostensibly on the basis that dual-use extraterrestrial
technologies might aid rogue states in regional conflicts.
According to Col
Phillip Corso, former head of the Foreign Technology Desk in the Army’s
Research and Development department, he led a top-secret clandestine project
to
reverse engineer ET technology recovered from the Roswell crash.
[48] He
wrote that his project successfully released a number of these reverse
engineered ET technologies for both the military and civilian sectors. Corso
claims that the rapid technological advances over the last 50 years, in,
were a direct result of these clandestine
projects.
A highly centralized and secret compartmentalized system has been put in
place to deal with the extraterrestrial presence and technology, and is
funded by revenues that escape the normal budgetary auditing and
accountability of government funded projects.
[49] The purpose of the
secret, centralized and compartmentalized system created in response to the
extraterrestrial presence, is to develop an effective defense system against
undesirable extraterrestrial intervention that threatens national or human
sovereignty. It is therefore worth exploring if there is a viable
alternative to such a secret, centralized and compartmentalized defense
system that can enhance human sovereignty and freedom.
During the early years of the Eisenhower administration when a group of
‘service oriented’ extraterrestrials met with US government officials
appointed to deal with the extraterrestrial presence, the extraterrestrials
offered to assist with a number of environmental, technological, political
and socioeconomic problems, with the sole condition that the US dismantle
its nuclear arsenal.
[50] When the government officials declined, this group
of extraterrestrials subsequently withdrew and played no role in the
government’s clandestine program to reverse engineer extraterrestrial
technology for advanced weaponry.
There is evidence that these
‘service oriented’ or ‘benevolent’ extraterrestrials have subsequently concentrated
their efforts with consciousness raising of the general public; warning of
the hazards of nuclear and ‘exotic’ weapon systems reverse engineered from
extraterrestrial technology; limiting the environmental impact of
clandestine projects; encouraging the development of alternatives to using
fossil fuel as an energy source; and preparing the general populace for
eventual disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence.
[51] None of these
areas of assistance were judged to be strategically significant from the
perspective of policy makers dealing with extraterrestrial affairs who based
their policies on the power politics advocated by Kissinger and others.
For example, former military and government ‘whistle blowers’ have revealed
the activities of clandestine government agencies and interests opposed to
incorporating extraterrestrial technology into the public arena.
[52] These
‘grass roots’ areas of assistance do however have strategic significance in
terms of organizing a grass roots social defense against undesirable
extraterrestrial intervention and/or subversion in human affairs. This form
of social defense is even more relevant given the very likely possibility
that extraterrestrial races have already infiltrated/subverted
military-intelligence organizations and severely compromised national
security systems.
[53] A global population fully aware of different
extraterrestrial races, and equipped with the grass roots technology to
provide for its own needs, would be able to provide another level of
planetary defense. Furthermore, an aware and self-empowered population would
be able to provide a means for a more democratic system that provides checks
and balances to the way in which the extraterrestrial presence is managed.
The failure of power politics as a successful strategy for responding to the
extraterrestrial presence has lead to irresponsible policies on
extraterrestrials being passed. This is due to the absence of checks and
balances that preclude undesirable extraterrestrial influences in a
genuinely democratic decision making process. Developing an aware and
empowered humanity requires that the global population begins working in
those ‘non-strategically significant’ areas that national security
organizations have dismissed.
What is urgently required is an action program
whereby the grass roots citizenry begin working with those extraterrestrial
races interested in human capacity building. As human capacities are
developed in collaboration with such races, greater awareness of the full
complexity of the extraterrestrial presence in terms of the activities and
agenda of different races will be generated. Developing human capacities
will help prevent irresponsible policy making by a more bold assertive
generation of leaders who may have been compromised in the centralized
compartmentalized national security system dealing with extraterrestrial
affairs. Strengthening grass roots social defense against undesirable
extraterrestrial intervention and subversion in global affairs is the best
means of maintaining human sovereignty and independence in a world slowly
awakening to the truth of the extraterrestrial presence.
|
Go Back |
|
ENDNOTES
(*)
My heartfelt thanks to H.M. for his generous support of my research into
the strategic aspects of the extraterrestrial presence, and for providing an
intellectually stimulating environment for this research to take place.
[1] See Michael Salla, “The Black Budget Report: An Investigation into the
CIA’s ‘Black Budget’ and the Second Manhattan Project,” available
HERE
[2] For reference to the extraterrestrial presence in the Second World War
era, see Michael Salla, Exopolitics: Political Implications of the
Extraterrestrial Presence (Dandelion Books, 2004) 109-48. Originally
published as: “Foundations for Globally Managing Extraterrestrial Affairs –
The Legacy of the Nazi Germany-Extraterrestrial Connection,”
Exopolitics.org, July 27, 2003. Available
HERE
[3] See Jamisson Neruda,
“Neruda Interview - #1”. Available
HERE
[4] For the different motivations of extraterrestrial races, see Michael Salla, Exopolitics, 1-58. Originally published as “The Need for Exopolitics:
Implications of Extraterrestrial Conspiracy Theories for Policy Makers and
Global Peace,” Exopolitics.org, Jan 21, 2003. Available
HERE
[5] For discussion of the Grays and their activities on Earth, see Courtney
Brown,
Cosmic
Voyage
(Onyx Books, 1997).
[6] See William Cooper, Beyond a Pale Horse & Michael Wolf, Catchers of
Heaven; and Bill Cooper,
[7] For information on different relationships between extraterrestrial
races, see Courtney Brown,
Cosmic Explorers (2000).
[8] See Zecharia Sitchen, The Wars of Gods and Men: Book III of the Earth
Chronicles (Avon 1999)
[9] Evidence of the cooperation between the different Reptilian species and
the Grays is found in whistleblower testimony of the Dulce underground base.
See Branton, The Dulce Wars: Underground Alien Bases and the Battle for
Planet Earth (Inner Light Publications, 1999); and Val Valerian, Matrix II:
The Abduction and Manipulation of Humans Using Advanced Technology (Leading
Edge Research Group, 1989/90). Available
HERE
[10] R. A. Boulay,
Flying Serpents and Dragons: The Story of Mankind's
Reptilian Past (Book Three, 1999).
[11] For discussion of the Reptilian presence, see Jim Marrs,
Rule by
Secrecy: The Hidden History That Connects the Trilateral Commission, the
Freemasons, and the Great Pyramids (Perennial, 2001); and David Icke, The
Biggest Secret: The Book That Will Change the World, Bridge of Love
Publications, 2nd ed. (January 1999).
[12] See Richard Sauders, Underwater and Underground Bases (Adventures
Unlimited Press, 2001).
[13] See Michael Salla, “The Dulce Report: Investigating Alleged Human
Rights Abuses at a Joint US Government-Extraterrestrial Base at Dulce, New
Mexico,” Available
HERE (September 25, 2003); and see Whitley Streiber,
“The Mystery of Pine Gap”
[14] See Salla, “The Dulce Report,”
Available
HERE
[15] For description of power politics and how it historically developed
from the national policies of Cardinal Richelieu, see Henry Kissinger,
Diplomacy (Touchstone Books, 1995)
[16] Hans Morgenthau, Politics among nations : the struggle for power and
peace (Alfred Knopf, 1985)
[17] Henry Kissinger, Does America Need a Foreign Policy (Touchstone Book,
2001)
[18] Nicolo Machiavelli, The Prince (Bantam 1984).
[19] Hersh, Seymour M. The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White
House (Summit Books, 1983).
[20] See Michael Salla, Exopolitics, 59-108. Originally published as
“Political Management of the Extraterrestrial Presence – The Challenge to
Democracy and Liberty in America,” Available
HERE (July 4, 2003).
[21] For description of how the major allied states cooperated after the
second world war era, see Michael Salla, Exopolitics, 109-48. Originally
published as: “Foundations for Globally Managing Extraterrestrial Affairs –
The Legacy of the Nazi Germany-Extraterrestrial Connection,”
Exopolitics.org, July 27, 2003. Available
HERE
[22] See Phillip Corso,
The Day After Roswell (Pocket Books, 1997).
[23] Phillip Corso, The Day After Roswell (Pocket Books, 1997) 292.
[24] See Richard Boylan, “Official Within MJ-12 UFO-Secrecy Management Group
Reveals Insider Secrets,”
[25] See William Cooper, “Origin, Identity and Purpose of MJ-12,”.
Available
HERE
see also
Phil Schneider, MUFON Conference Presentation, 1995, available
HERE
see also Neruda
Interview #1. Available
HERE
finally, Dr Richard Boylan gives a more
extensive coverage of events surrounding the Treaty signing in
“Extraterrestrial Base On Earth, Sanctioned By Officials Since 1954,”
available
HERE
[26] William Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse.
[27] “John Lear’s Disclosure Briefing,” Coast to Coast Radio (Nov 2, 2003)
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2003/11/02.html
[28] See Richard Boylan, “Quotations from Chairman Wolf"; also Richard Boylan, “Colonel Steve
Wilson, USAF (ret.) Reveals UFO-oriented Project Pounce,”
http://drboylan.com/swilson2.html .
[29] Brother Jonathan, “What Is HAARP? What it looks and Sounds Like,”
Brother Jonathan News 12/15/00
http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/bj1203.html
[30] For an online article discussing the LFA sonar and its damage on the
cetacean population, see John Roach, “Military Sonar May Give Whales the
Bends, Study Says,” National Geographic News (October 8, 2003)
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/10/1008_031008_whalebends.html
[31] See Brother Jonathan, “What Is HAARP? What it looks and Sounds Like,”
Brother Jonathan News 12/15/00
http://www.brojon.org/frontpage/bj1203.html
[32] For discussion of contact scenarios, see Michael Salla, “The Race for
First Contact - Shaping Public Opinion for the Open Appearance of
Extraterrestrial Races,” (December 8, 2003). Available
HERE
[33] See Michael Salla, Exopolitics, 109-48. Originally published as
“Foundations for Globally Managing Extraterrestrial Affairs – The Legacy of
the Nazi Germany-Extraterrestrial Connection,” (July 27,
2003) Available
HERE
[34] For discussion of the black budget and network of black operations it
funds, see Michael Salla, “The Black Budget Report: An Investigation into
the CIA’s ‘Black Budget’ and the Second Manhattan Project” (11/23/2003).
Available
HERE
[35] See Kissinger, Diplomacy.
[36] Richard Boylan, “Quotations from Chairman Wolf”
[37] See Michael Salla, “The Black Budget Report: An Investigation into the
CIA’s ‘Black Budget’ and the Second Manhattan Project” (11/23/2003).
Available
HERE
[38] See M. Salla Exopolitics, 149-90. First published as “Responding to
Extraterrestrial Infiltration of Clandestine Organizations Embedded in
Military, Intelligence and Government Departments,”
May 30, 2003. Available
HERE
[39] Phil Schneider’s gave a 1995 lecture that is available at a number of
websites and titled, “A Lecture by Phil Schneider – May, 1995” One site is
http://www.ufoarea.bravepages.com/conspiracy_schneider_lecture.html
[40] See Val Valerian, Matrix II: The Abduction and Manipulation of Humans
Using Advanced Technology (Leading Edge Research Group, 1989/90). Available
HERE
[41] Jim Marrs,
Rule By Secrecy: The Hidden History That Connects the
Trilateral Commission, the Freemasons, and the Great Pyramids (Perennial,
2001); David Icke,
The Biggest Secret: The Book That Will Change the World,
Bridge of Love Publications, 2nd ed. (January 1999); and Lynne Picknett &
Clive Prince, The Stargate Conspiracy: The Truth About Extraterrestrial Life
and the Mysteries of Ancient Egypt (Berkley Pub Group, 2001).
[42] See Alex Constantine, Psychic Dictatorship in the USA (Feral House,
1995).
[43] See Preston Nichols,
Montauk Project: Experiments in Time (Sky Books,
1999); Al Bielek and Brad Steiger, The Philadelphia Experiment and Other UFO
Conspiracies (Innerlight Publications, 1991); Stewart Swerdlow, Montauk: The
Alien Connection (Expansions Publishing Co. 2002); Wade Gordon, The
Brookhaven Connection (Sky Books, 2001). For an online interview with Al
Bielek, available
HERE
[44] For positive encounters see John Mack, Abduction: Human Encounters
with Aliens (New York: Ballantine Books, 1994); and Mack, Passport to the
Cosmos: Human Transformation and Alien Encounters (Three Rivers Press,
2000). For more sinister encounters see David Jacobs, The Threat: Revealing
the Secret Alien Agenda (Simon and Schuster, 1998). Budd Hopkins, Missing
Times (Ballantine Books, 1990);
[45] See Michael Salla, “The Dulce Report: Investigating Alleged Human
Rights Abuses at a Joint US Government-Extraterrestrial Base at Dulce, New
Mexico,” (September 25, 2003); available
HERE
[46] The most famous of these were the Billy Meier's visitations, which were
supported by extensive photographic evidence. See Michael Horn,
“Professional Skeptics Group Proves UFOs Real Organization expected to retract defamatory claims, facilitate $1,000,000
award to Swiss man,”
http://www.rense.com/general45/org.htm
[47] Gilliland is author of, and has a website at: Becoming Gods II: Interdimensional Mind Earth Changes & The Quickening UFOs Their Origins and
Intentions (Self-Mastery Earth Institute, 1997) website is:
http://www.eceti.org/
[48] . Corso, The Day After Roswell (Pocket Star, 1997).
[49] See Michael Salla, “The Black Budget Report: An Investigation into the
CIA’s ‘Black Budget’ and the Second Manhattan Project” (11/23/2003).
Available
HERE
[50] . See Michael
Wolf, Catchers of Heaven; and Bill Cooper, Beyond a Pale Horse. In a
website article, Cooper wrote: [A] race of human-looking aliens
contacted the U.S. Government. This alien group warned us against the
aliens that were orbiting the Equator and offered to help us with our
spiritual development. They demanded that we dismantle and destroy our
nuclear weapons as the major condition. They refused to exchange
technology citing that we were spiritually unable to handle the
technology which we then possessed. They believed that we would use any
new technology to destroy each other. This race stated that we were on a
path of self-destruction and we must stop killing each other, stop
polluting the earth, stop raping the Earth's natural resources, and
learn to live in harmony. These terms were met with extreme suspicion
especially the major condition of nuclear disarmament. It was believed
that meeting that condition would leave us helpless in the face of an
obvious alien threat. We also had nothing in history to help with the
decision. Nuclear disarmament was not considered to be within the best
interest of the United States. The overtures were rejected. Available
HERE
[51] For more detailed discussion of ‘helper extraterrestrials’, see Michael Salla, Exopolitics, 1-58.
[52] . See Steven M. Greer, Extraterrestrial Contact: The Evidence and
Implications (Crossing Point Publications, 1999).
[53] See M. Salla, Exopolitics, 149-90. First published as Michael Salla,
“Responding to Extraterrestrial Infiltration of Clandestine Organizations
Embedded in Military, Intelligence and Government Departments,” May 30,
2003, available
HERE
|
Go Back |
|
|